DOCSLIB.ORG

Acoustic Characteristics of Tense and Lax Vowels Across Sentence Position in Clear Speech Lindsay Kayne Roesler University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Acoustic Characteristics of Tense and Lax Vowels Across Sentence Position in Clear Speech Lindsay Kayne Roesler University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee University of Wisconsin Milwaukee UWM Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations August 2013 Acoustic Characteristics of Tense and Lax Vowels Across Sentence Position in Clear Speech Lindsay Kayne Roesler University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uwm.edu/etd Part of the Other Rehabilitation and Therapy Commons Recommended Citation Roesler, Lindsay Kayne, "Acoustic Characteristics of Tense and Lax Vowels Across Sentence Position in Clear Speech" (2013). Theses and Dissertations. 754. https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/754 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by UWM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UWM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ACOUSTIC CHARACTERISTICS OF TENSE AND LAX VOWELS ACROSS SENTENCE POSITION IN CLEAR SPEECH by Lindsay Roesler A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Communication Sciences and Disorders at The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee August 2013 ABSTRACT ACOUSTIC CHARACTERISTICS OF TENSE AND LAX VOWELS ACROSS SENTENCE POSITION IN CLEAR SPEECH by Lindsay Roesler The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2013 Under the Supervision of Professor Jae Yung Song The purpose of this study was to examine the acoustic characteristics of tense and lax vowels across sentence positions in clear speech. Recordings were made of 12 participants reading monosyllabic target words at varying positions within semantically meaningful sentences. Acoustic analysis was completed to determine the effects of Style (clear vs. conversational), Tenseness (tense vs. lax), and Position (sentence-medial vs. sentence-final) on vowel duration, vowel space area, vowel space dispersion, and vowel peripheralization. The results showed speakers had longer durations and expanded vowel spaces in clear speech for both tense and lax vowels. Importantly, the amount of increase was similar for tense and lax vowels suggesting the defining properties of lax vowels (i.e., short duration and centralization) were manipulated in clear speech. A significant main effect of position for lax vowel space expansion showed greater vowel spaces for lax vowels in sentence-medial position in clear speech. Clear speech vowel adaptations appear to be dynamic with both vowel-specific and general transformations. ii © Copyright by Lindsay Roesler, 2013 All Rights Reserved iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Clear Speech History .................................................................................................... 2 2. Background ..................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Speaking Fundamental Frequency Range ..................................................................... 5 2.2 Speaking Rate ............................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Vowel Lengthening ..................................................................................................... 11 2.4 Vowel Space Expansion ............................................................................................. 13 2.4.1 Vowel Space Area ............................................................................................ 14 2.4.2 Vowel Space Dispersion ................................................................................... 17 2.4.3 Vowel Peripheralization ................................................................................... 19 3. Vowel Production and Source Filter Theory ................................................................ 21 4. Vowel Classifications ................................................................................................... 23 5. Dialectal Variation ........................................................................................................ 25 6. Goals ............................................................................................................................. 26 6.1 Rationale ..................................................................................................................... 26 6.2 Purpose ........................................................................................................................ 28 7. Methods......................................................................................................................... 29 7.1 Listeners ...................................................................................................................... 29 7.2 Speaker Subjects ......................................................................................................... 30 7.3 Equipment ................................................................................................................... 30 7.4 Procedure .................................................................................................................... 31 7.5 Stimuli ......................................................................................................................... 33 7.6 Data ............................................................................................................................. 36 7.7 Acoustic Coding.......................................................................................................... 37 7.7.1 Durational Coding ............................................................................................ 37 7.7.2 Formant Coding ................................................................................................ 38 8. Results ........................................................................................................................... 41 8.1 Vowel Duration ........................................................................................................... 41 8.2 Vowel Space Area....................................................................................................... 47 8.3 Vowel Space Dispersion ............................................................................................. 50 8.4 Vowel Peripheralization.............................................................................................. 57 iv 9. Discussion ..................................................................................................................... 61 9.1 Summary of Results and Comparison to Previous Research ...................................... 61 9.1.1 Vowel Duration ................................................................................................ 64 9.1.2 Vowel Space Area ............................................................................................ 65 9.1.3 Vowel Space Dispersion ................................................................................... 66 9.1.4 Vowel Peripheralization ................................................................................... 67 9.2 Theoretical Implications ............................................................................................. 68 9.3 Limitations .................................................................................................................. 69 9.4 Future Research .......................................................................................................... 70 References ......................................................................................................................... 72 Appendices ........................................................................................................................ 77 Appendix A: Listener Consent Form ................................................................................ 77 Appendix B: Listener Scripts ............................................................................................ 78 Appendix C: Recruitment Flyers ...................................................................................... 79 Appendix D: Consent ........................................................................................................ 80 Appendix E: IRB approval................................................................................................ 87 Appendix F: Short Questionnaire ..................................................................................... 88 Appendix G: Hearing Screening ....................................................................................... 89 Appendix H: Dialect Screening ........................................................................................ 90 Appendix I: Dialect Screening Data Sheet ....................................................................... 91 Appendix J: Stimuli .......................................................................................................... 92 v LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Vowel space area in conversational (conv.) and clear speech (Figure adapted from Smiljanic and Bradlow, 2005).................................................................................. 15 Figure 2. Vowel space dispersion in conversational and clear speech (Figure adapted from Smiljanic and Bradlow, 2005).................................................................................. 18 Figure 3. Vowel peripheralization for /i/ (Figure adapted from Smiljanic and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bleaching and Coloring*
    386 Bleaching and Coloring* Patricia D. Miller Ohio State University Current studies in natural phonology have dealt with vowels in terms of three cardinal properties: palatality, labiality, and sonority. Palatality and labiality--the chromatic properties--are optimized by a minimally open, maximally constricted vocal tract; and sonority is optimized by a more open vowel tract) Thus the familiar triangle: A or, more exactly a a represents the maximal opposition of the three properties.2 And in many ways, the vowel space does seem to be triangular: ordinarily, the more sonorant a vowel is, the less color it has; and the more chromatic it is--the less sonorant. Thus, while i, e, and m are all palatal, i is more palatal than e, and e is more palatal than m; and, similarly, the degree of rounding varies for u, o, 3. The vowels #, A, and a are colorless or achromatic. They lack both palatality and labiality, and differ only in sonority.3 In this framework, the terms bleaching and coloring are almost self-explanatory: bleaching removes color, and coloring adds color. Bleaching Bleaching may remove palatality or labiality, or both simultaneously: V !lover -Labial !unstressed and/or !lax/short -Palatal] !mixed _(context) Full-scale operation of bleaching will produce linear vowel systems like those of the Caucasian languages reported to have k, A, a. If A lowers, it will produce the system 4, a like that of Kabardian (Kuipers 1960:23 et passim), or that of the child Curt4 (011er forthcoming); or, if all achromatics lower, it will give the single- vowel system, a.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 1: Introduction to The
    PREVIEW OF THE IPA HANDBOOK Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A guide to the use of the International Phonetic Alphabet PARTI Introduction to the IPA 1. What is the International Phonetic Alphabet? The aim of the International Phonetic Association is to promote the scientific study of phonetics and the various practical applications of that science. For both these it is necessary to have a consistent way of representing the sounds of language in written form. From its foundation in 1886 the Association has been concerned to develop a system of notation which would be convenient to use, but comprehensive enough to cope with the wide variety of sounds found in the languages of the world; and to encourage the use of thjs notation as widely as possible among those concerned with language. The system is generally known as the International Phonetic Alphabet. Both the Association and its Alphabet are widely referred to by the abbreviation IPA, but here 'IPA' will be used only for the Alphabet. The IPA is based on the Roman alphabet, which has the advantage of being widely familiar, but also includes letters and additional symbols from a variety of other sources. These additions are necessary because the variety of sounds in languages is much greater than the number of letters in the Roman alphabet. The use of sequences of phonetic symbols to represent speech is known as transcription. The IPA can be used for many different purposes. For instance, it can be used as a way to show pronunciation in a dictionary, to record a language in linguistic fieldwork, to form the basis of a writing system for a language, or to annotate acoustic and other displays in the analysis of speech.
    [Show full text]
  • Phonetics Exercises—Answers, P. 1
    44166. STRUCTURE OF ENGLISH II: THE WORD Prof. Yehuda N. Falk Phonetics Exercises—Answers, p. 1 PART 1: Review Exercises 1. Write down the phonetic symbols representing the following descriptions, and illustrate each of the sounds with two English words. a) A voiced labiodental fricative [v] h) A high front tense unrounded vowel [i] b) A voiceless alveolar fricative [s] i) A low back lax unrounded vowel [a] c) A voiced palato-alveolar affricate [ï] j) A mid front tense unrounded vowel [e] d) A voiceless glottal fricative [h] k) A mid front lax unrounded vowel [å] e) A voiceless bilabial stop [p] l) A high back lax rounded vowel [Ț] f) A voiceless dental fricative [“] m) A low back lax rounded vowel [ö] g) A voiced velar stop [g] n) A high front tense rounded vowel [ü] 2. Answer the following questions. a) What voiced consonant has the same place of articulation as [t] and the same manner of articulation as [f]? [z] b) What voiceless consonant has the same active articulator as [b] and the same passive articulator as [ ›]? [f] c) What voiced consonant has the same place of articulation as [m] and the same manner of articulation as [ l]? [b] d) What voiced consonant has the same active articulator as [n] and the same passive articulator as [f]? [ð] e) Which tense vowel has the same height as [ w] and the same advancement as [a]? [u] f) Which rounded vowel has the same height as [ e]? [o] 3. Indicate whether the following statements are TRUE or FALSE.
    [Show full text]
  • American Indian Languages (Abbreviated A), and the Alphabet of the Dialect Atlas of New England (Abbreviated D)
    CONCORDANCE OF PHONETIC ALPHABETS Robert C. Hollow, Jr. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill A concordance of 3 major phonetic alphabets used in North America is presented and discussed. Those alphabets consid- ered are one used by the International Phonetic Association, one used for American dialectology and one used for American Indian languages. Comparisons are made in terms of vowel symbols, -consonant symbols, secondary segmental- symbols, and diacritic marks. Typewriter equivalents of standard symbols are also given. [phonetics, linguistics, North A.merica, American Indians, phonetic symbols] This paper is a brief concordance of the major phonetic alphabets currently in use by linguists and anthropologists in North America. The alphabets included are the International Phonetic Alphabet (abbreviated I in this paper), the Americanist alphabet used in the transcription of American Indian Languages (abbreviated A), and the alphabet of the Dialect Atlas of New England (abbreviated D). For convenience I have divided the concordance into five sections: 1) Primary Vowel Symbols, 2) Primary Consonant Symbols, 3) Secondary Segmental Symbols, 4) Diacritic Marks, and 5) Typewriter Symbols. The form of I used in this paper is the 1951 revision as fully presented in The Principles of the International Phonetic Association (International Phonetic Association 1957). D is presented and discussed in the Handbook of the Linguistic Geography of New England (Kurath, Bloch and Hansen 1939). This alphabet is based onI, but includes certain modifications made to facilitate the transcription of American English dialect material. There is no single phonetic alphabet currently in use by students of American Indian Languages, for this reason I have consulted several alternate formu- lations of phonetic alphabets given by scholars in the field, most notably 42 Bloch and Trager (1942), Pike (1947), Trager (1958), and Shipley (1965).
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER TWELVE the Phonemes of German
    CHAPTER TWELVE The Phonemes of German THE CONSONANTS At the end of Chapter Eleven it was stated that German has 20 consonant phonemes. In our IPA transcriptions we have been using 22 different consonant symbols, so two of these must not represent phonemes in their own right. When determining the phonemes of a language we are interested in inventory and distribution. The inventory is the set of phonemes. The distribution is a set of statements about the environments in which the phonemes can occur, e.g. at any point in a word, only initially, etc., and the form they take in those environments. With these two factors in mind, let us again list the consonants of German as we have been transcribing them, this time giving, where possible, examples with the consonants in word-initial position, in word-medial position (between vowels), and in word-final position1. Consonant Initially Medially Finally [p] passe ['pas@] Raupen ['RaUp@n] rieb ['Ri:p] [b] Bass ['bas] rauben ['RaUb@n] [t] Tasse ['tas@] baten ['bA:t@n] riet ['Ri:t] [d] das ['das] baden ['bA:d@n] [k] Kasse ['kas@] Haken ['hA:k@n] Sieg ['zi:k] [g] Gasse ['gas@] Hagen ['hA:g@n] [f] fasse ['fas@] Höfe ['hø:fə] reif ['RaIf] [v] was ['vas] Löwe ['lø:və] [s] reißen ['RaIs@n] Reis ['RaIs] [z] Satz ['zats] reisen ['RaIz@n] [S] Schatz ['Sats] rauschen ['RaUS@n] Rausch ['RaUS] [Z] Genie [Ze'ni:] Rage ['RA:Z@] [C] China ['Ci:na] reichen ['RaIC@n] reich ['RaIC] [x] rauchen ['RaUx@n] Rauch ['RaUx] [m] Masse ['mas@] hemmen ['hEm@n] Ramm ['Ram] [n] nasse ['nas@] Hennen ['hEn@n] rann ['Ran] [Î] hängen ['hEÎ@n] rang ['RaÎ] [l] lasse ['las@] Kohle ['ko:l@] will ['vIl] [R] Rasse ['Ras@] bohre ['bo:R@] wirr ['vIR] [7á] wir ['vi:7á] [j] Jacke ['jak@] Koje ['ko:j@] [h] hasse ['has@] 1 This list, with certain minor changes, is taken from Moulton (1962:21).
    [Show full text]
  • 'Apropos of the Dutch Vowel System'
    ‘Apropos of the Dutch Vowel System’ Rudolf P.G. de Rijk bron R.P.G. de Rijk, ‘Apropos of the Dutch Vowel System.’ Niet eerder gepubliceerde paper, mei 1967, p. 1-38. Zie voor verantwoording: http://www.dbnl.org/tekst/rijk004apro01_01/colofon.htm © 2002 dbnl / Rudolf P.G. de Rijk 1 Apropos of the Dutch Vowel System.1) By R.P.G. de Rijk, May 1967. For reasons which I will come to in a moment, it is necessary to partition the vowels of Dutch into the following two classes: Class I: α, ε, i, ɔ, ø. Class II: a, e, ī, o, ü, u, ö. (I disregard the three loan phonemes ε̄, ø̄, and ɔ̄, which occur only in two or three words, such as / sε̄rə/, ‘sunroom’, / frø̄lə/, ‘Freule’, / rɔ̄zə/, ‘pink’, / kɔ̄r /, ‘fraternity’.) These are the traditional diagrams for representing each of the classes: Class I: i ε ø ɔ α Class II: ī ü u e ö o a The asymmetry of class I will be commented on later. First, I will give some examples of morphemes in which these vowels occur. Between slashes I will put the informal representation that I am using and for which no theoretical status is claimed. In quite a few cases the lexical representation of the item in question will be different from, the form between slashes. English glosses will be given between quotes. Occasionally, the representation of the item in the current Dutch spelling system will be added between parentheses. I. 1 /mαn/, ‘man’, (man); /bαst/, ‘bast’, (bast); /kαr/, ‘cart’, (kar); /kαt/, ‘cat’, (kat); /kαlv/, ‘calf’, (kalf); /stαl/, ‘stable’, (stal).
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Stress and Tenseness on the Production of Cvc Syllables in German
    EFFECTS OF STRESS AND TENSENESS ON THE PRODUCTION OF CVC SYLLABLES IN GERMAN Christine Mooshammer, Susanne Fuchs, Dirk Fischer ZAS - Research Centre for General Linguistics, Berlin, Germany ABSTRACT gestures for lax vowels [9]. In Standard German tense and lax vowels are affected by stress in different ways: Tense vowels are lengthened whereas the 1.2. Kinematic Correlates of Stress and Tenseness duration of lax vowels stays relatively constant. Both the vari- As was found by Harrington, Fletcher and Roberts [4] for jaw ation of stress and tenseness can be attributed to a truncation of movements, stress is produced by a difference in intergestural the opening gesture. The first aim of this study is to compare timing, i.e. for unstressed vowels in CVC syllables the opening acoustical and kinematic parameters of these effects. Analyses of gesture is truncated by the closing gesture. This mechanism leads the durations revealed the same degree of truncation for tense to a reduction of the ratio of the interval between velocity peaks unstressed and lax stressed vowels. to total movement duration (peak-to-peak ratio) and a greater The second aim concerns vowel targets. It is still a subject of skewness of both velocity profiles (acceleration ratio) (see [1]). debate whether the tenseness contrast holds only in stressed Furthermore the number of acceleration peaks between velocity syllables or is neutralized in unstressed syllables. Therefore we peaks changes from two to one. There is no substantial change in analyzed quality differences by means of formant frequencies and peak velocities, but a small reduction of movement amplitudes.
    [Show full text]
  • Consonant Gemination in Moroccan Arabic: a Constraint-Based Analysis1
    Journal of Applied Language and Culture Studies pISSN 2605-7506 Issue 3, 2020, pp. 37-68 e2605-7697 https://revues.imist.ma/index.php?journal=JALCS Consonant Gemination in Moroccan Arabic: A Constraint-Based Analysis1 Ayoub Noamane Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco To cite this article: Noamane, A. (2020). Consonant Gemination in Moroccan Arabic: A Constraint-based Analysis. Journal of Applied Language and Culture Studies, 3, 37-68. Abstract The purpose of this paper is to examine the phonological and morphological patterning of geminates in Moroccan Arabic (MA), using the constraint-based framework of Optimality Theory (Prince & Smolensky 1993/2004; McCarthy & Prince,1993a, 1993b, 1995). In particular, the central aim of this work is to uncover the constraint interactions responsible for the creation and distribution of the geminate patterns attested in MA. The questions we seek to answer are: (a) What motivates the occurrence of geminates in MA? (b) How can a sequence of non-identical consonants be transformed into a geminate consonant? (c) What is the role of gemination in word formation? Keywords: lexical geminates; phonological geminates; morphological 1 This article has benefitted enormously from discussions with Karim Bensoukas, Aziz Boudlal, Joe Pater and John McCarthy. I would also like to thank the audience of the 6th Annual Doctoral Symposium on Arabic Linguistics, held at the Faculty of Letters and Human Sciences Ben M‟Sik - Casablanca in April 2018, for comments on a presentation of the content of this paper. Special thanks also go to JALCS’s reviewers. All errors are entirely mine. 37 geminates; assimilation; syllabification; word formation; Optimality Theory; Moroccan Arabic 0.
    [Show full text]
  • English Vowels • There Are up to 12 Contrastive Vowels in Stressed Syllables
    Applied Phonetics & Vowels and the ESL Learner Phonology English has a rather “exotic” vowel system. Some problems often faced by ESL learners: English Vowels • There are up to 12 contrastive vowels in stressed syllables. Most languages have between 5 and 8. • Vowel articulation is far more difficult to physically describe than consonant articulation. Tom Payne, TESOL at Hanyang University, 2007 • Spelling does little to help. Vowels and the ESL Learner Classification of Vowels • Pronunciation of vowels varies Vowels can be classified in terms of: dramatically in stressed vs. unstressed • Acoustic properties syllables. • Articulation • English “tense” vowels usually involve an “off glide” that is hard for L2 learners to master. • Much of the dialect variation in Englishes spoken around the world involves vowels. The Acoustic Classification of The Acoustic Classification of English Vowels: Spectrograms English Vowels: Spectrograms • Spectrograms display the resonating •A Pure Tone is a sound that is composed frequencies (or “formants”) that make up a of vibrations of only one frequency: speech sound. • The spectrogram is a running short-term diagram – it displays a continuously changing pattern of frequencies (a sound “spectrum”). 1 The Acoustic Classification of /ə/– Neutral (schwa) Vowel English Vowels: Spectrograms (LPC Spectrum) •A Complex Tone is a sound that is composed of vibrations of more than one frequency: F1 F2 F3 F4 • Vowels are complex tones composed of four frequencies, of formants , designated as F1, F2, F3 and F4. /a/– Formants /i/ - Formants F1 F2 F3 F4 F1 F2 F3 F4 /u/ Formants F1 F2 F3 F4 Kent (1997). The Speech Sciences 2 Articulatory Classification of Articulatory Classification of English Vowels English Vowels There are 3 parameters needed to Lip position is another property often uniquely identify all phonemic used to characterized English vowels.
    [Show full text]
  • Tenseness, Vowel Shift, and the Phonology of the Back Vowels in Modern English Author(S): Morris Halle Source: Linguistic Inquiry, Vol
    Tenseness, Vowel Shift, and the Phonology of the Back Vowels in Modern English Author(s): Morris Halle Source: Linguistic Inquiry, Vol. 8, No. 4 (Autumn, 1977), pp. 611-625 Published by: The MIT Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4178010 Accessed: 14-04-2018 02:08 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms The MIT Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Linguistic Inquiry This content downloaded from 18.9.61.111 on Sat, 14 Apr 2018 02:08:42 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Linguistic Inquiry Volume 8 Number 4 (Fall, 1977) 611-625 Morris Halle Tenseness, Vowel Shift, and the Phonology of the Back Vowels in Modern English* 1. Tenseness The feature of tenseness has had a long and complicated career in phonetics. Tenseness was first recognized as a distinct phonetic feature by A. M. Bell, the founder of modern phonetics, in his Visible Speech (1867). Bell used this feature to distinguish vowels such as those in German Biene 'bee', See 'sea', gut 'good', and Sohn 'son' from those in bitte 'please', fest 'firm', Hund 'dog', and Sonne 'sun'.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture Notes and Other Handouts for Introductory Phonology
    Lecture Notes and Other Handouts for Introductory Phonology: A Course Packet Steve Parker GIAL and SIL International Dallas, 2013 Copyright © 2013 by Steve Parker and other contributors Preface This set of materials is designed to be used as handouts accompanying an introductory course in phonology, particularly at the undergraduate level. It is specifically intended to be used in conjunction with Stephen Marlett’s 2001 textbook, An Introduction to Phonological Analysis. The latter is currently available for free download from the SIL Mexico branch website. However, this course packet could potentially also be adapted for use with other phonology textbooks. The materials included here have been developed by myself and others over many years, in conjunction with courses in introductory phonology taught at SIL programs in North Dakota, Oregon, Dallas, and Norman, OK. Most recently I have used them at GIAL. Two colleagues in particular have contributed significantly to many of these handouts: Jim Roberts and Steve Marlett, to whom my thanks. I would also like to express my appreciation and gratitude to Becky Thompson for her very practical service in helping combine all of the individual files into one exhaustive document, and formatting it for me. Many of the special phonetic characters appearing in these materials use IPA fonts available as freeware from the SIL International website. Unless indicated to the contrary on specific individual handouts, all materials used in this packet are the copyright of Steve Parker. These documents are intended primarily for educational use. You may make copies of these works for research or instructional purposes (under fair use guidelines) free of charge and without further permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Gemination in English Loans in American Varieties of Italian*
    Gemination in English loans in American varieties of Italian* Lori Repetti SUNY, Stony Brook Why do geminate consonants frequently appear in borrowed words when the foreign form does not contain a geminate? In this paper I review previous approaches to this problem, and suggest that they are insufficient in accounting for consonant length contrasts in English loan words in North American varieties of Italian. I suggest that many factors are involved in the determination of consonant length in loans, including aspects of the grammar of the borrowing language (in this case, Italian) — such as the inventory of segments, the structure of the stressed syllable, and the presence of similar native lexical items — as well as the interpretation of the morphological structure and phonetic details of the foreign word. 1. Introduction Non-etymological geminates often appear in the adapted form of loan words, and are attested in Japanese, Finnish, Kannada, Maltese Arabic, Hungarian, and Italian, including North American varieties of Italian (henceforth “American-Italian”) (1), as well as many other languages. (1) English American-Italian a. coal ['kolle] b. gingerale ['dinda'rella] c. brush ['bro∫∫a] d. bushel ['bu∫∫olo] e. creek ['krikka] f. fell ['felli] g. tape ['teppa] h. team ['timme] *I would like to thank the audience at the Going Romance Workshop on Loan Phonology, Amsterdam, 8 December 2006, and especially Andrea Calabrese, Andrew Nevins and Michael Friesner, as well as two anonymous reviewers for the helpful comments. Lori Repetti The phenomenon whereby a singleton consonant in the loaning language is adapted as a geminate consonant in the borrowing language is very common cross-linguistically, and has vexed phonologists for some time.
    [Show full text]