DOCSLIB.ORG

Geohydrology of Pahute Mesa-3 Test Well, Nye County, Nevada

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geohydrology of Pahute Mesa-3 Test Well, Nye County, Nevada Geohydrology of Pahute Mesa-3 Test Well, Nye County, Nevada U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 95-4239 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (Interagency Agreement DE-A108-86-NV10583) Geohydrology of Pahute Mesa-3 Test Well, Nye County, Nevada By KATHRYN C. KILROY and CHARLES S. SAVARD U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 95-4239 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (Interagency Agreement DE-Al08-86-NV10583) DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsi- bility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Refer- ence herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recom- mendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. Carson City, Nevada 1996 US. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GORDON P. EATON, Director Any use of trade names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 333 West Nye Lane, Room 203 Box 25286 Carson City, NV 89706-0866 Denver, CO 80225-0046 CONTENTS Abstract .................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction............................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Purpose and Scope ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 Location ofthe Study Area ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Previous Work ............................................................................................................................................................ 2 Acknowledgments...................................................................................................................................................... 2 Drilling Procedures and Test-Well Construction ................................................................................................................... 2 Geology.................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Geophysical Logging Methods .............................................................................................................................................. 6 Caliper, Acoustic, and Electric Logs .......................................................................................................................... 6 Caliper ............................................................................................................................................................ 6 Acoustic ......................................................................................................................................................... 12 Resistivity ....................................................................................................................................................... 12 Conductance ................................................................................................................................................... 13 Spontaneous Potential..................................................................................................................................... 14 Nuclear Logs .............................................................................................................................................................. 14 Epithermal Neutron ........................................................................................................................................ 14 Density ............................................................................................................................................................ 14 Spectral Gamma Ray ...................................................................................................................................... 14 Gamma Ray .................................................................................................................................................... 15 Borehole Flow Survey ................................................................................................................................................ 15 Temperature Prior to Tracer Survey ............................................................................................................... 15 Tracer Survey.................................................................................................................................................. 16 Temperature During Mphg........................................................................................................................ 16 Discussion .................................................................................................................................................................. 16 Injection Tests ........................................................................................................................................................................ 17 Analytical Methods .................................................................................................................................................... 17 Test Conditions ........................................................................................................................................................... 18 Test Results ................................................................................................................................................................ 18 Interval A ........................................................................................................................................................ 18 Interval B ........................................................................................................................................................ 20 Interval C ........................................................................................................................................................ 20 Interval D ........................................................................................................................................................ 20 Interval E ........................................................................................................................................................ 20 Interval F ......................................................................................................................................................... 20 Interval G ........................................................................................................................................................ 22 Discussion .................................................................................................................................................................. 22 Aquifer Test ........................................................................................................................................................................... 22 Analytical Methods .................................................................................................................................................... 22 Unconfined Radial Flow ................................................................................................................................. 23 Confined Radial Flow ..................................................................................................................................... 24 Specific Capacity ............................................................................................................................................ 25 Test Conditions............................................................................................................................................... 25 Analysis of Results ..................................................................................................................................................... 26 Unconfined Conditions ................................................................................................................................... 26 Confined Conditions ......................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Plate 1 117° 116°
    U.S. Department of the Interior Prepared in cooperation with the Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5175 U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of Energy Plate 1 117° 116° Monitor Range White River Valley Hot Creek Valley 5,577 (1,700) Warm Springs Railroad Valley 6 5,000 4,593 (1,400) Stone Cabin Valley Quinn Canyon Range Tonopah 5,577 (1,700) Ralston Valley NYE COUNTY 4,921 (1,500) LINCOLN COUNTY Big Smoky Valley 5,249 (1,600) 38° 38° 5,906 (1,800) 5,249 (1,600) Ralston Valley Coal Valley 5,249 (1,600) Kawich Range 4,265 (1,300) 4,921 (1,500) 5,249 (1,600) 6,234 (1,900) 5,577 (1,700) 4,921 (1,500) Railroad Valley South CACTUS FLAT 5,200 | 200 Cactus Range Penoyer Valley Goldfield 5,249 (1,600) 3,800 | 3,800 4,921 (1,500) Clayton Valley 3,609 (1,100) Rachel Sand Spring Valley 5,249 (1,600) 5,577 (1,700) Sarcobatus Flat North Kawich Valley 4,593 (1,400) 5,600 | 5,600 93 Pahranagat Valley 4,921 4,593 (1,400) 4,593 (1,400)5,249 3,937 (1,200)4,265 (1,300) Gold Flat Pahranagat Range 4,921 (1,500) Pahute Mesa–Oasis Valley 6,300 | 5,900 Belted Range Alamo 4,265 (1,300) 4,593 (1,400) 3,609 (1,100) Scottys Emigrant Valley Junction Black Pahute Mesa Nevada National Mountain Security Site 3,281 (1,000) NYE COUNTY Sarcobatus Flat ESMERALDA COUNTY ESMERALDA Rainier Mesa 3,937 (1,200) Yucca Flat Timber Death Valley North Mountain 4,000 | 4,000 Yucca Flat Sarcobatus Flat South Oasis Valley subbasin Grapevine 37° 37° Springs area 1,900 | 1,900 4,265 Grapevine Mountains Bullfrog Hills 2,297 (700) 100 | 100 3,937 (1,200) Ash Meadows 20,50020,500 |
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Amargosa River Pupfish (Cyprinodon Nevadensis Amargosae) in Death Valley National Park, CA
    California Fish and Game 103(3): 91-95; 2017 Distribution of Amargosa River pupfish (Cyprinodon nevadensis amargosae) in Death Valley National Park, CA KRISTEN G. HUMPHREY, JAMIE B. LEAVITT, WESLEY J. GOLDSMITH, BRIAN R. KESNER, AND PAUL C. MARSH* Native Fish Lab at Marsh & Associates, LLC, 5016 South Ash Avenue, Suite 108, Tempe, AZ 85282, USA (KGH, JBL, WJG, BRK, PCM). *correspondent: [email protected] Key words: Amargosa River pupfish, Death Valley National Park, distribution, endangered species, monitoring, intermittent streams, range ________________________________________________________________________ Amargosa River pupfish (Cyprinodon nevadensis amargosae), is one of six rec- ognized subspecies of Amargosa pupfish (Miller 1948) and survives in waters embedded in a uniquely harsh environment, the arid and hot Mojave Desert (Jaeger 1957). All are endemic to the Amargosa River basin of southern California and Nevada (Moyle 2002). Differing from other spring-dwelling subspecies of Amargosa pupfish (Cyprinodon ne- vadensis), Amargosa River pupfish is riverine and the most widely distributed, the extent of which has been underrepresented prior to this study (Moyle et al. 2015). Originating on Pahute Mesa, Nye County, Nevada, the Amargosa River flows intermittently, often under- ground, south past the towns of Beatty, Shoshone, and Tecopa and through the Amargosa River Canyon before turning north into Death Valley National Park and terminating at Badwater Basin (Figure 1). Amargosa River pupfish is data deficient with a distribution range that is largely unknown. The species has been documented in Tecopa Bore near Tecopa, Inyo County, CA (Naiman 1976) and in the Amargosa River Canyon, Inyo and San Bernardino Counties, CA (Williams-Deacon et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Underground Test Area (UGTA) Sub-Project Strategy: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Plan (RREMP)
    Nevada Test Site 828 underground nuclear tests were conducted on the Nevada Underground Test Area Test Site from 1951 to 1992. Some of the tests occurred near or below the water table, (UGTA) Sub-Project resulting in groundwater contamination. Pahute Mesa Earth Vision three-dimensional 5'4!3UB 0ROJECTSTAFFARERESPONSIBLEFOR computer model EVALUATINGTHEIMPACTOFHISTORICNUCLEARTESTS ONGROUNDWATERRESOURCESANDSTUDYINGTHE EXTENTOFCONTAMINANTMIGRATION 4HE5'4!!PPROACH q /RGANIZEDINTOFIVE#ORRECTIVE!CTION5NITS#!5S q !#!5ISAGROUPINGOF#ORRECTIVE!CTION3ITES#!3S BASEDONTHE LOCATIONSOFHISTORICUNDERGROUNDNUCLEARTESTSANDSIMILARGEOLOGY q %ACH#!5ISANALYZEDANDEVALUATED q 7ELLSAREDRILLEDTOCOLLECTFIELDDATASAMPLES q &IELDDATAISUSEDTOCREATETHREE DIMENSIONALCOMPUTERMODELS q -ODELSAREUSEDTOESTIMATEGROUNDWATERFLOWANDTRANSPORTPARAMETERS q -ODELSARETHEPREFERREDDECISIONTOOLSFORPREDICTINGCURRENTANDFUTURE location of contamination q -ONITORINGOFGROUNDWATERISUSEDTOEVALUATEMODELPREDICTIONSAND ENSURECOMPLIANCEWITHREGULATORYREQUIREMENTS Central Pahute Mesa CAU 9UCCA 5'4!WELL%2 DURINGMOBILIZATIONON9UCCA&LAT &LAT CAU $/%STAFFWORKSWITHOTHERORGANIZATIONSINACOLLABORATIVE Western Pahute APPROACHTOUNDERSTANDTHENATUREANDEXTENTOFGROUNDWATER Mesa CAU contamination: s,AWRENCE,IVERMORE.ATIONAL,ABORATORY s,OS!LAMOS.ATIONAL,ABORATORY &RENCHMAN 2AINIER &LAT s $ESERT2ESEARCH)NSTITUTE Mesa CAU 3HOSHONE s 5NITED3TATES'EOLOGICAL3URVEY Mountain CAU s 3TATEOF.EVADA s .ATIONAL3ECURITY4ECHNOLOGIES s .AVARRO )NTERA !LLACTIVITIESARECONDUCTEDINACCORDANCEWITHTHE&EDERAL &ACILITY!GREEMENTAND#ONSENT/RDER&&!#/
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Aircraft Hazards
    QA: QA 000-30R-WHSO-00 100-000-005 March 2005 Identification of Aircraft Hazards Prepared for: U.S.Department of Energy Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Office of Repository Development 1551 Hillshire Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89134-6321 Prepared by: Bechtel SAC Company, LLC 1 180 Town Center Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89144 Under Contract Number DE-AC28-01RW 12101 I DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or any third party’s use or the results of such use of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof or its contractors or subcontractors. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. 000-30R-WHSO-00 100-000-005 11 March 2005 I Originators: K.L. Ashlei Preclosyjfe Safety Analysis Checkers: Guy Ragan,YU Checker, - Preclosure Safety Analysis WhDQ&U* 22 )uUQ 2005 W. Dockery, Quality En'gineering Representative Date Responsible Manager: 3/!!+6- Date ..
    [Show full text]
  • Locally Intruded by Late Mesozoic (@93 M.Y.BP) Plutonic Rocks Related Ti the Sierra Nevada Batholith
    —-...--...——.—— LA-10428-MS ! CIC-14REPORT COLLECTION C3* Reproduction COPY :,;-.+Z;LJJ I .—.— .n.Tm—. Los Alamos Nationel Laboratory IS operated by the Unlverslty 01 California for the Uruted States Department of Energy undercontiact W-7405 .ENG-36. ,- ~.. ., . ,.. -. ,. .. .— - “- , . .,, i. ,, . .. ,.- . ... ,<.- . ...-;; . .: : . .. ,.:-” ,,,.,, , -; ,. ,. ., , .,-,. .N, u , ,,“~ : “,,; ,’...... .,, .!. ,,,.. , ., . .., .. ... # ,,.. .. ,,. .. ,. .- . “. ,, ‘..,.,.Nevada Test Site Field Trip (iuidebook .-, ,. ,. ,., , ..,,..,,“ :. .,,4,,d. .,}.., , .. “:.,-. ! ————. 1984 .--.—.. -:----s ● H.-: - -r., -. .,% .~hd.? I ..-.— —. .. — . .— —.— —...——— LosAlamosNationalLaboratory LosAllallT10sLosAlamos,NewMexico87545 k AffiitiveActlosa/Equdt)p@UOity fh@oyS?S This work was supported by the US Department of Energy, Waste Management Program/Nevada Operations Ofiiee and Los Alamos Weapons Development Pro- gram/Test Operations. Edited by Glenda Ponder, ESSDivision DISCLAIMER Thisreport waspreparedas an accountof work sponsoredby an agencyof the LhdtedStatesCoverrrment. Neitherthe UnitedStates Governmentnor any agencythereof, nor any of their employees,makesany warranty,expressor irnpIied,or assumesany Iegatliabilityor responsibilityfor the accuracy,wmpletenesa, or usefutncasof any information,apparatus,product, or processdisclosed,or representsthat i!ausewould not infringeprivatelyownedrights. Reference hereinto any specificcommercialproduct, process,or serviceby trade name,trademark,manufacturer,or otherwise,doesnot newaaarilywnatitute or Irssplyits
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology of the Nevada Test Site and Surrounding Area
    The Geology of the Nevada Test Site and Surrounding Area Clark and Nye Counties, Nevada July 5-7, 1989 Field Trip Guidebook T 186 Leaders: H. Lawrence McKague Paul P Orkild Steven R Mattson Contributions By: F M. Byers Bruce M. Crowe E. D. Davidson Holly A. Dockery Terry A. Grant E. L Hardin Robert A. Levich A. C Matthusen Robert C Murray H. A. Perry Donna Sinks American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C. Copyright 1989 American Geophysical Union 2000 Florida Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20009 ISBN: 0-87590-636-2 Printed in the United States of America THe Geology of the Nevada Test Site and Surrounding Area COVER A view southeast across Mercury, NV towards the snow covered Spring Mountains. Mt. Charleston is the high peak in the Spring Mountains near the left edge of the photograph. The bare ridge Just beyond Mercury is the southwestern extension of the Spotted Range. Mercury Valley is the northwest extension of the Las Vegas shear zone. Leaders: Lawrence McKague Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory P.O. Box 279, L-279 Livermore, CA 94550 Paul Orkild U.S. Geological Survey Steven Mattson S.A.I.C. Suite 407 Valley Bank Building 101 Convention Center Dr. Las Vegas, NV 89109 IGC FIELD TRIP T186 THE GEOLOGY OF THE NEVADA TEST SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA: A FIELD TRIP FOR THE 28th INTERNATIONAL GEOLOGICAL CONGRESS H. Lawrence McKague(l), Paul P. Orkild(2), Steven R. Mattson(3) With Contributions by F. M,. Byers(4), Bruce M. Crowe(4), E. D. Davidson(3) Holly A. Dockery (1), Terry A.
    [Show full text]
  • Nevada National Security Site Environmental Report 2016 ATT-A-I Attachment A: Site Description
    DOE/NV/25946--3334-ATT A Environmental Report 2016 Attachment A: Site Description September 2017 National Nuclear Security Administration LLC National Security Technologies Vision • Service • Partnership A Message from the Manager The U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office (NNSA/NFO) strives to achieve our missions in a safe, secure, sustainable, and environmentally responsible manner. Our staff, our contractor and laboratory partners, as well as other users of the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) succeed through demonstrated teamwork, innovation, and continuous improvement. The NNSA/NFO presents this environmental report to summarize actions taken in 2016 to protect the environment and the public while achieving our mission goals. It is prepared for the public and our stakeholders in hopes that it is readily understandable and usable. It is a key component in our efforts to keep the public informed of environmental conditions at the NNSS and its support facilities in Las Vegas, Nevada. The NNSA/NFO ensures the validity and accuracy of the data contained in this report. We invite you to help us improve the usefulness and readability of this Environmental Report by providing your comments and concerns to Peter A. Sanders, ([email protected]). Steven J. Lawrence Nevada Field Office Manager DOE/NV/25946--3334-ATT A Environmental Report 2016 Attachment A: Site Description This report was prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office By: National Security Technologies, LLC Las Vegas, Nevada September 2017 Compiled by Cathy Wills, Editor Graphic Designer: Katina Loo Geographic Information System Specialist: Ashley Burns Work performed under contract number: DE-AC52-06NA25946 Attachment A: Site Description Table of Contents List of Figures ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Extension Related Breccias: Implications For
    EXTENSION RELATED BRECCIAS: IMPLICATIONS FOR GROUNDWATER FLOW FROM PAHUTE MESA TO NEAR BEATTY, NEVADA by Sarah Angelina Morealli Bachelor of Science, Slippery Rock University, 2006 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The Department of Geology and Planetary Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science University of Pittsburgh 2010i UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This thesis was presented by Sarah A. Morealli It was defended on April 13, 2010 and approved by Dr. Ian Skilling, Assistant Professor, Department Faculty Dr. Brian Stewart, Associate Professor, Faculty Thesis Director/Dissertation Advisor: Dr. Thomas H. Anderson, Professor, Faculty ii Copyright © by Sarah A. Morealli 2010 iii EXTENSION-RELATED BRECCIAS: IMPLICATIONS FOR GROUNDWATER FLOW FROM PAHUTE MESA TO NEAR BEATTY, NEVADA Sarah A. Morealli, M.S. University of Pittsburgh, 2010 ABSTRACT The Las Vegas Valley Shear Zone, a right lateral strike slip fault that trends >100 m at N60W, makes a right step east of Beatty, Nevada resulting in detachment faulting and rhyolitic volcanism characteristic of the South West Nevada Volcanic Field. In the Fluorspar Canyon region of the field area, the Fluorspar Canyon- Bullfrog Hills (FC-BH) detachment dips 40° N and separates Late-proterozoic and Paleozoic strata in the footwall from Tertiary Volcanics and sediments in the hanging wall. To the east, the detachment links with the moderately dipping Tate’s Wash Fault. After removing the 40°N tilt, these two structures form a listric normal fault that cuts through the Paleozoic and into the crystalline basement. The hanging wall does not crop out in the field area and may be represented by the strata of the Grapevine Mountains of Death Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Stable Isotopes in Precipitation and Ground Water in the Yucca Mountain
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USGS Staff -- ubP lished Research US Geological Survey 1989 STABLE ISOTOPES IN PRECIPITATION AND GROUND WATER IN THE YUCCA MOUNTAIN REGION, SOUTHERN NEVADA: PALEOCLIMATIC IMPLICATIONS Larry Benson University of Colorado at Boulder, [email protected] Harold Klieforth Desert Research Institute Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub Benson, Larry and Klieforth, Harold, "STABLE ISOTOPES IN PRECIPITATION AND GROUND WATER IN THE YUCCA MOUNTAIN REGION, SOUTHERN NEVADA: PALEOCLIMATIC IMPLICATIONS" (1989). USGS Staff -- Published Research. 789. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub/789 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the US Geological Survey at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USGS Staff -- ubP lished Research by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Geophysical Monograph Series Aspects of Climate Variability in the Pacific and the Western Americas Vol. 55 Geophysical Monograph 55 STABLE ISOTOPES IN PRECIPITATION AND GROUND WATER IN THE YUCCA MOUNTAIN REGION, SOUTHERN NEVADA: PALEOCLIMATIC IMPLICATIONS Larry Benson InterdisciplinaryClimate SystemsGroup Room 135, National Center of AtmosphericResearch, Boulder, CO 80307 Harold Klieforth AtmosphericSciences Center Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV 89506 Abstract. Unadjustedages of ground-watersamples indicate that most recordof lake-levelchange
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Flow Conceptualization of the Pahute Mesa–Oasis Valley
    Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office, Office of Environmental Management under Interagency Agreement, DE-EM0004969 Groundwater Flow Conceptualization of the Pahute Mesa– Oasis Valley Groundwater Basin, Nevada: A Synthesis of Geologic, Hydrologic, Hydraulic-Property, and Tritium Data Scientific Investigations Report 2020–5134 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Photograph of Colson Pond in northern Oasis Valley, looking south toward Beatty, Nevada. Photograph by Steven R. Reiner, U.S. Geological Survey, 2020. Groundwater Flow Conceptualization of the Pahute Mesa–Oasis Valley Groundwater Basin, Nevada: A Synthesis of Geologic, Hydrologic, Hydraulic-Property, and Tritium Data By Tracie R. Jackson, Joseph M. Fenelon, and Randall L. Paylor Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office, Office of Environmental Management under Interagency Agreement, DE-EM0004969 Scientific Investigations Report 2020–5134 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2021 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydraulic Characterization of Volcanic Rocks in Pahute Mesa Using an Integrated Analysis of 16 Multiple-Well Aquifer Tests, Nevada National Security Site, 2009–14
    Prepared in cooperation with the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office, Office of Environmental Management under Inter- agency Agreement, DE-NA0001654 Hydraulic Characterization of Volcanic Rocks in Pahute Mesa Using an Integrated Analysis of 16 Multiple-Well Aquifer Tests, Nevada National Security Site, 2009–14 Scientific Investigations Report 2016-5151 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover photograph: Drill rig at the ER-EC-15 well site at Pahute Mesa, looking west, within 2 miles of the western Nevada National security Site and Area 20 boundary. Photograph by Robert B. Goodwin, Navarro, November 2010. Hydraulic Characterization of Volcanic Rocks in Pahute Mesa Using an Integrated Analysis of 16 Multiple-Well Aquifer Tests, Nevada National Security Site, 2009–14 By C. Amanda Garcia, Tracie R. Jackson, Keith J. Halford, Donald S. Sweetkind, Nancy A. Damar, Joseph M. Fenelon, and Steven R. Reiner Prepared in cooperation with the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office, Office of Environmental Management under Interagency Agreement, DE-NA0001654 Scientific Investigations Report 2016–5151 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2017 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://store.usgs.gov/.
    [Show full text]
  • Mojave Desert Vista
    Chapter Two — Landscape Design Segments Landscape Design Segments TABLE of CONTENTS Section One: Highway Zones .............................................................................. 2.3 Section Two: Mojave Desert Vista ..................................................................2.15 Section Three: Silver Legends ...........................................................................2.22 Section Four : Great Basin Oasis ......................................................................2.34 Section Five: Pony Express Passage ...............................................................2.49 UNLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE & PLANNINGLV RESEARCH Introduction Chapter Two — Landscape Design Segments INTRODUCTION be further divided into highway zones. These cat- nity interface zone. Within this zone, traffic-calm- COMPREHENSIVE DESIGN CONCEPT egories establish program elements and goals that ing techniques are appropriate and pedestrian needs This chapter establishes the design direction for should always be considered when addressing proj- dominate. As communities develop and adjacent land The corridor design concept can be articulated highway landscape and aesthetics. The chapter is ects located along roads with similar characteristics uses change, the highway zone associated with the for both rural and urban segments. In rural organized into five sections. The first section de- (downtowns, transition areas, etc.). new land use and development can be updated. Fig- or predominately undeveloped areas, the scribes program elements
    [Show full text]