High Subarctic Tundra

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

High Subarctic Tundra ECOREGION Forest Barren Tundra Bog L3 High Subarctic Tundra NF 1 h e w i d e l y Mealy Mountains, just south of Lake Melville, T scattered High contain some of the highest mountains in Subarctic Tundra is Labrador, some of which remain snow-covered 2 primarily an inland year-round. ecoregion. It is marked by high plateaus and This rugged, mountainous ecoregion is 3 mountains dissected by the upper reaches of dominated by large areas of exposed bedrock, fjords, with elevations ranging from 600 to 1,000 with some steep-walled valleys, such as at Harp metres above sea level. Lake and the Fraser River valley. Scattered rock 4 The ecoregion's boundary extends debris and talus are common. from the northern tree limit at Napoktok Bay Vegetation is limited, and greatest in south to include the George River valleys. However, compared to the Alpine 5 Plateau, then west along the border Tundra ecoregion to the north, where trees between Quebec and Labrador, are limited to small stands of deciduous 6 encompassing pockets of land trees and conifer trees are absent, this c h a r a c t e r i z e d b y h i g h ecoregion is characterized by the elevations. High Subarctic presence of conifers and by slightly 7 There are also several Tundra more extensive forest cover. outliers located farther south, Ecoregion Due to the cold climate of including areas on the this ecoregion, lakes can remain 8 McPhayden Plateau, Benedict frozen as late as July. In the M o u n t a i n s , R e d W i n e McPhayden Plateau area, 9 M o u n t a i n s , a n d M e a l y lakes are often linear in Mountains. shape, following fault The McPhayden Plateau lines in the bedrock. LAB is a rocky upland area located along the western edge of 1 Labrador. The rounded Benedict M o u n t a i n s o c c u r n o r t h o f 2 Groswater Bay where they rise abruptly Soil Profile: Rocklands dominate the land with pockets of orthic humo-ferric podzols and from the Labrador Sea, while the Red Wine orthic dystric brunisols common throughout Mountains are located in central Labrador. The the ecoregion. 3 Ecoregion: An area that has Fjord: A deep U-shaped valley Fens: Wetlands characterized 4 distinctive and repeating formed by a glacier and by poor drainage and a thick patterns of vegetation and soil afterwards filled by sea water layer of peat — soil consisting 5 development, which are to form a long, narrow, steep- of partially decomposed determined and controlled by sided inlet. plants. The dominant plants in regional climate. Ecoregions fens are often sedges, 6 can be distinguished from Talus: The collection of rock grasses, shrubs, and mosses, each other by their plant and rubble that forms at the particularly sphagnum moss. communities, landscapes, base of a slope as material 7 geology, and other features. erodes off the mountainside Outwash terrace: A level These characteristics, in turn, above. Commonly known as sand or gravel surface partway 8 influence the kinds of wildlife "scree.” up a slope that was laid down that can find suitable habitat by a glacier- fed stream. within each ecoregion. 9 Check your public library for a full set (36) of these booklets: one introductory document and one for each of the 35 ecoregions and subregions in the province. For more information about the series see page 4. 10 Landscape Profile - High Subarctic Tundra 1000 m rock gardens willow lichen shrub birch spruce pond 600 m Geology: This ecoregion spans all four of the geologic provinces of Labrador. The majority of the ecoregion, however, falls within the Churchill Province, and is underlain by gneisses and other metamorphic rocks between 2.5 and 1.7 billion years old. Large bodies of granitic, gabbroic, and anorthositic rocks, dated at about 1.3 billion years, have intruded these metamorphic rocks; the intrusions host the Voisey's Bay nickel deposit. Gneisses of the Superior Province underlie the large outlier in the McPhayden River area in western Labrador. Other, smaller outliers occur to the south, generally over high ground underlain by some of the more resistant rocks of the Grenville Province. grow, a characteristic that association with black spruce in Vegetation distinguishes the High Subarctic these forests. On the outwash Profile Tundra from the Alpine Tundra terraces of valley floors, spruce ecoregion. White birch and willow forests are more open — that is, pland areas in the High thickets (which can survive on the trees are more widely spaced. The USubarctic Tundra ecoregion less-stable scree) often form a lichen understory that occurs here are much like those in the Alpine transition zone between the tundra can be extensive and thick. The Tundra ecoregion to the north — above and the black spruce forests main lichens are Stereocaulon the landscape is primarily tundra, on the slopes below. species rather than the caribou with vegetation limited to patches Larch, balsam fir, and white lichens that dominate farther of lichens, willows, sedges, birch occasionally grow in south. mosses, and dwarf shrubs. For the most part, tundra occurs around the Arctic Circle above the treeline and is characterized by a very short growing season. Bare rock accounts for more than 50 percent of the surface area of the plateaus in this ecoregion. A continuous cover of n vegetation in high areas occurs a y R only where snow accumulates, n e l such as in depressions, which n a G y . yield enough moisture to sustain R A n : plants throughout the growing e l o t G season. These areas of plant o A h : P growth are known as snow-bed o t o communities. h Species in Focus: Larch (Larix laricina), which is also known as tamarack or P Shallow fens, containing juniper, is the only coniferous tree in Canada that is also deciduous. This various sedges, sphagnum means that, unlike other conifers such as spruce and fir, larch loses its needles mosses, and some bog laurel, also each fall and produces new ones each spring. Found throughout occur on plateaus where drainage Newfoundland and Labrador in bogs, barrens, and forests, larch is often the is poor. first tree species to colonize disturbed sites such as roadside embankments. At lower elevations in the In summer its needles are a feathery bluish-green. In fall, larch turns a vibrant ecoregion, however, forests do yellow and stands out brightly against the surrounding spruce and fir. 2 High Subarctic Tundra ecoregion Wildlife Profile his is the most important region in Labrador for caribou. In the T n o tundra portions of this ecoregion, i s i v caribou, arctic fox, Ungava i D lemming, red fox, northern bog s a e lemming, and arctic hare can be r A l found. Mammals found in the a r u forest and shrub areas of the valley t a N slopes include lynx, woodchuck, d n snowshoe hare, mink, heather a s vole, masked shrew, porcupine, k r a and red squirrel. P : o Meadow voles live in t o h wetland areas; mammals that live P in a variety of habitats within the Species in Focus: Members of a number of caribou herds appear ecoregion are black bear, short- seasonally on the tundra. Part of the calving area for the George River tailed weasel, wolf, and least caribou herd is in the northern portion of the High Subarctic Tundra weasel. Beaver, muskrat, and river ecoregion. The George River herd had an estimated 385,000 animals in otter are the main aquatic 2001, a major reduction from the 1993 estimate of 700,000 animals. mammals. However smaller numbers has resulted in generally healthier animals and The vast majority of bird has allowed the population of neighbouring barren-land herds to increase. species in the High Subarctic Other woodland herds, such as the MacPhayden, Benedict Mountain, Red Tundra are present as breeders Wine, and Mealy Mountain populations, are present in the ecoregion's during the spring and summer, outliers to the south and west. The North American caribou is the same species as the reindeer of then migrate south for the winter. northern Europe and Asia. Compared to the island of Newfoundland, Exceptions are willow and rock Labrador provides vast areas of good habitat for caribou. Caribou's natural ptarmigan and raven, all of which predators include lynx, bear, and wolf, which it detects almost entirely are year-round residents here. through its sense of smell. Young caribou are particularly vulnerable, Characteristic breeding although a two to three-day-old calf can outrun a lynx or bear. birds of the barrens include rough- legged hawk, peregrine falcon, ecoregion are arctic char, snow bunting, and Lapland three-spine stickleback, longspur. Typical birds inhabiting nine-spine stickleback, forested areas are merlin, northern brook trout, lake trout, flicker, blackpoll warbler, pine northern pike, white grosbeak, American robin, and sucker, and slimy sculpin. three-toed woodpecker. Tree Atlantic salmon and sparrow, white-crowned sparrow, rainbow smelt occur and northern shrike are found in o c c a s i o n a l l y . N o shrub/thicket habitats. Lincoln's amphibians or reptiles sparrow occurs in wetlands. occur in this ecoregion. Waterfowl found breeding in the vicinity of freshwater include Canada goose, red-breasted Ugjoktok Fjord, with its merganser, and the harlequin steep-sided valley walls duck, whose eastern population is reaching over 500 metres designated as special concern.
Recommended publications
  • I. G E O G RAP H IC PA T T E RNS in DIV E RS IT Y a . D Iversity And
    I. GEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS IN DIVERSITY A. Diversity and Endemicty B. Patterns in Mammalian Richness 1 – latitude 2 – area 3 – isolation 4 – elevation C. Hotspots of Mammalian Biodiversity 1 – relevance 2 – optimal characteristics of hotspots 3 – empirical patterns for mammals II. CONSERVATION STATUS OF MAMMALS A. Prehistoric Extinctions B. Historic Extinctions 1 – summary (totals) 2 – taxonomic, morphologic bias 3 – Geographic bias C. Geography of Extinctions 1 – prehistory and human colonization 2 – geographic questions 3 – range collapse in mammals Hotspots of Mammalian Endemicity Endemic Mammals Species Richness (fig. 1) Schipper et al 2009 – Science 322:226. (color pdf distributed to lab sections) Fig. 2. Global patterns of threat, for land (brown) and marine (blue) mammals. (A) Number of globally threatened species (Vulnerable, Endangered or Critically Fig. 4. Global patterns of knowledge, for land Endangered). Number of species affected by: (B) habitat loss; (C) harvesting; (D) (terrestrial and freshwater, brown) and marine (blue) accidental mortality; and (E) pollution. Same color scale employed in (B), (C), (D) species. (A) Number of species newly described since and (E) (hence, directly comparable). 1992. (B) Data-Deficient species. Mammal Extinctions 1500 to 2000 (151 species or subspecies; ~ 83 species) COMMON NAME LATIN NAME DATE RANGE PRIMARY CAUSE Lesser Hispanolan Ground Sloth Acratocnus comes 1550 Hispanola introduction of rats and pigs Greater Puerto Rican Ground Sloth Acratocnus major 1500 Puerto Rico introduction of rats
    [Show full text]
  • Baltic Journal of Economics
    Sponsored by: Baltic Journal of Economics The Bank of Latvia Baltic Journal of Economics Volume 6 Number 2 Winter/Spring 2007 Articles TheBankofEstonia Interdependence of Nordic and Baltic Stock Markets Ulf Nielsson Volume 6 Number 2 Winter/Spring 2007 Euro Introduction Effects on Individuals’ Economic Decisions: Testing the Presence of Difference Assessment Account among Lithuanian and Latvian Consumers Lineta Ramoniene and Dovydas Brazys An Economic Analysis of the Influence of Different Vilnius University Attitudes Toward Game Animals: Emphasizing the Significance of Large Carnivores Yukichika Kawata Book Reviews Constantine A. Stephanou (ed.) Adjusting to EU Enlargement. Recurring Issues in a New Setting by Mark Chandler Published by EuroBaltic Centries of Excellence www.eurobaltic.lv/bje.html The Baltic Journal of Economics Information for Contributors to the Baltic Journal of Economics Articles submitted to the BJE must be typed in double spacing throughout. Articles should be no more than 10,000 words in length, including notes and references. An abstract of up Jorgen Drud Hansen to 125 words should precede the main text, accompanied by up to five key words and JEL Editor in Chief classification. Raul Eamets Editor Tides and section headings should be clear and brief. Lengthy quotations (exceeding 40 words) University of Tartu should be displayed, indented, in the text. Submitted articles must be of good English language quality using British or American spelling. Kenneth Smith Editor Tables and figures should have concise and descriptive titles. All footnotes to tables and their Millersville University source should be typed below the tables. References cited in the text should read: Smith (1998: 66–9), Kroncke and Smith (1988, 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Download Scriptie
    Dissertation 2011-2012 Vanessa Almeida da Silva Amorim Wolf V Dog – Predator V Pet 4 BDAO Titel Predator V Pet – the difference between wolves and dogs Abstract Dogs play a prominent role in modern day society. Most of them are kept for companionship which translates into a very close dog-human relationship. Canis familiaris have adapted incredibly well to man-made society however with an increasing number of cases ending up in shelters it is fair to say that this subject still needs further exploration. A lot has been written about the way dogs behave and how owners can improve their relationship with their pet. A very popular vision on dog behaviour is the wolf pack theory also called lupomorphism. For a long time the interpretation of this vision consisted in the need for a dog owner to be a leader by any means. If an owner is not strong enough as a leader a dog will try to take over this role and show behaviour that is not desirable. Recent studies have shown that there are gaps in this theory. The vision on how a wolf pack functions has changed and there is an increasing number of experts that agree that the best study subject for dog behaviour is in fact the dog itself. The goal of this thesis is to clarify how dogs and wolves relate to each other as species both biologically and psychologically. A lot of literature research has gone into this thesis to try and find out what really goes on inside a dog’s head and if comparing them to wolves is useful to grasp that idea.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife-Endangeredspecies-Marten
    COVER PHOTOGRAPH American Marten in Newfoundland, by Emily Herdman RECOMMENDED CITATION The Newfoundland Marten Recovery Team. 2010. Recovery plan for the threatened Newfoundland population of American marten (Martes americana atrata). Wildlife Division, Department of Environment and Conservation, Government of Newfoundland and Labrador, Corner Brook, Canada. iii + 31 pp. AUTHORS The initial draft of this plan was prepared by John W. Gosse (Parks Canada Agency). Revisions were completed by Brian Hearn (Canadian Forest Service), Emily Herdman (Wildlife Division, Government of Newfoundland and Labrador (WD)), and Susan Squires (WD). Technical sections were prepared by Adam Durocher (Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre), Emily Herdman (WD), Isabelle Schmelzer (WD), and Jonathan Sharpe (WD). The Newfoundland Marten Recovery Team (Appendix A) holds the authorship of this document and provided editorial review. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Thanks to Kim Mawhinney (Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada) for providing technical guidance and support in the development of the initial draft of this recovery plan. RESPONSIBLE JURISDICTIONS Government of Newfoundland and Labrador Environment Canada (Canadian Wildlife Service) Parks Canada Agency 2010 Recovery plan for the American marten in Newfoundland i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The marten (Martes americana atrata) on the island of Newfoundland are a genetically and geographically distinct population of the more widely distributed American marten found across the boreal region of North America. Marten were historically distributed throughout most areas of productive forest on the island; however, the cumulative impacts of habitat alteration, forest harvest, and incidental mortality associated with snaring and trapping limited their abundance and distribution resulting in their designation as threatened under both Federal and Provincial endangered species legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • Gray Wolf Paul C
    P1: FBQ PB336A-23 Feldhammer/0180G May 21, 2003 16:46 23 Gray Wolf Paul C. Paquet Canis lupus and Allies Ludwig N. Carbyn NOMENCLATURE both to Canis lycaon, with a common name of red wolf. The recom- mended name is based on historical precedence (Brewster and Fritts C N. Gray wolf, timber wolf, tundra wolf, plains wolf, 1995). This proposal raises numerous legal, policy, and management Spanish, lobo; French, loup; Inuktituk, amaruq; here, we use the com- questions. mon name “gray” wolf for the description of all subpopulations, al- As an alternative to conventional taxonomic classifications, The- though gray may not be the predominant color phase over large regional berge (1991) proposed an ecological classification of wolf subspecies. areas (Wilson and Reeder 1993) Using major prey species and vegetation zones as the principal criteria, S N. Canis lupus his classification comprises 10 categories or “ecotypes.” These eco- logical criteria may or may not be correlated with morphological and Subspecies. As expected in a widely distributed species, considerable genetic differences. variation occurs across the vast range of the gray wolf. The designation of wolf subspecies according to recently formulated criteria (e.g., Avise and Ball 1990; O’Brien and Mayr 1991), which place subspecies on a EVOLUTION more empirical foundation, is not feasible at this time. The subspecific taxonomy of the gray wolf in North America has not been adequately The gray wolf is a member of the Canidae, or dog family, which is part analyzed by modern techniques and is unsatisfactory. A comprehensive of the order Carnivora. Although a distinct taxon, it is closely related molecular taxonomic revision of the species, using the much larger and to coyotes and Simien jackals (C.
    [Show full text]
  • Other-Hearted Vs. Otherkin A(N) Guide Written by Marz and Published in Our Otherkin Section
    Other-Hearted vs. Otherkin A(n) Guide written by Marz and published in our Otherkin section. An expansion of terms, their usage, and importance to members of the community. ---- As the Otherkin community continues to grow the term is shaped and warped to encompass everyone and is often misinterpreted. A ‘movement’ that is gaining momentum now is trying to change the definition of Otherkin to encompass those who have strong feelings towards, or relate well with non-human beings. This thought process most likely comes from the lack of knowledge of a term that already exists for those who strongly relate to non-human beings. To fully understand these terms and their uses let’s break them down one definition at a time. Definitions to consider: Identity- The fact of being who or what a person or thing is. (Identity [Def. 1.]) Relating (relate to)- Feel sympathy with; identify with. (Relating [Def. 2.4]) Definitions within the community: Animal-Hearted- when an individual strongly identifies with a species of creature. (NLN, Kai) Animal-hearted can be replaced with other-hearted when used in reference to non-corporeal beings, beings from folklore, etc. · example: dragon-hearted, cat-hearted, shadow-hearted, fiction-hearted Otherkin- A community of people who (non-physically) identify as, in part or in whole, one or more non-human beings. (NLN, Kai) This is seen as an umbrella term for those who identify as anything non-human. Including but not restricted to Earthly animals (though normally going by the term Therian), angels, demons, elves, aliens, energy beings, and even cartoon characters.
    [Show full text]
  • An Account of the Taxonomy of North American Wolves from Morphological and Genetic
    This manuscript has been submitted by the authors for publication in a scientific journal. Its contents should not be incorporated into other writings or publications without crediting the authors by citation of this manuscript. 1 An Account of the Taxonomy of North American Wolves from Morphological and Genetic 2 Analyses 3 4 Steven M. Chambers,* Steven R. Fain, Bud Fazio, Michael Amaral 5 6 S.M. Chambers 7 Division of Ecological Services, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, PO Box 1306, Albuquerque, 8 New Mexico 87103 9 10 S.R. Fain 11 National Forensics Laboratory, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1490 East Main Street, Ashland, 12 Oregon 97520-1310 13 14 B. Fazio 15 Mexican Wolf Recovery Program, New Mexico Ecological Services Field Office, U.S. Fish and 16 Wildlife Service, 2105 Osuna Road, NE, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87113. Current address: 17 Wildlife and Sport Fish Restoration Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, PO Box 1306, 18 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87103. 19 20 M. Amaral 21 New England Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 70 Commercial Street, Suite 300 22 Concord, New Hampshire 03301-5087 23 1 This manuscript has been submitted by the authors for publication in a scientific journal. Its contents should not be incorporated into other writings or publications without crediting the authors by citation of this manuscript. 24 *Corresponding author: [email protected] 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 2 This manuscript has been submitted by the authors for publication in a scientific journal.
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of the Southern Red-Backed Vole, Clethrionomys Gapperi, in Newfoundland: Implications for the Endangered Newfoundland Marten, Martes Americana Atrata
    09_05010_voles.qxd 6/5/07 5:59 PM Page 50 First Record of the Southern Red-Backed Vole, Clethrionomys gapperi, in Newfoundland: Implications for the Endangered Newfoundland Marten, Martes americana atrata BRIAN J. HEARN,1 JOHN T. NEVILLE,1 WILLIAM J. CURRAN,1 and DEAN P. SNOW2 1Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service – Atlantic Forestry Centre, P.O. Box 960, Corner Brook, Newfoundland A2H 6J3 Canada 2 College of the North Atlantic, Fish and Wildlife Program, P.O. Box 822, Corner Brook, Newfoundland A2H 6H6 Canada Hearn, Brian J., John T. Neville, William J. Curran, and Dean P. Snow. 2006. First record of the Southern Red-Backed Vole, Clethrionomys gapperi, in Newfoundland: implications for the endangered Newfoundland Marten, Martes americana atrata. Canadian Field Naturalist 120(1): 50–56. We report on the first capture of the Southern Red-backed Vole (Clethrionomys gapperi), the eleventh non-native terrestrial mammal established on the island of Newfoundland over the last 150 years. Red-backed Voles may have been accidentally introduced by unknown sources in pulpwood imports or may have been deliberately introduced in an attempt to augment the depauperate small mammal fauna as a vigilante recovery effort for the endangered Newfoundland Marten (Martes americana atrata). We anticipate significant utilization of the Red-backed Vole as prey by both Newfoundland Marten and Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) with associated demographic responses within and between these species. Red-backed Voles will likely change habitat utilization patterns for the endemic subspecies of Meadow Vole, Microtus pennsylvanicus terraenovae. Key Words: Southern Red-backed Vole, Clethrionomys gapperi, Marten, Martes americana atra, introduced species, New- foundland.
    [Show full text]
  • Canis Lupus. L
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USGS Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for 1974 Canis lupus. L. David Mech USGS Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsnpwrc Part of the Animal Sciences Commons, Behavior and Ethology Commons, Biodiversity Commons, Environmental Policy Commons, Recreation, Parks and Tourism Administration Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Mech, L. David, "Canis lupus." (1974). USGS Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center. 334. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsnpwrc/334 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USGS Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. MAMMALIAN SPECIES No. 37, pp. 1-6, 5 figs. Canis lupus. By L. David Mech Published 2 May 1974 by The American Society of Mammalogists Canis lupus Linnaeus, 1758 House, Saskatchewan, Canada (synonyms are Lupus- Gray Wolf Griseus Sabine, and knightii Anderson). C. 1. pambasileus Elliot, 1905:79, see above. Canis lupus Linnaeus, 1758:39. Type locality Sweden. C. 1. tundrarum Miller, 1912:1, see above. Canis lycaon Schreber, 1775:pl. 89. Type locality Quebec, C. 1. baileyi Nelson and Goldman, 1929:165. Type locality Quebec, by restriction (Goldman, 1937:38). Colonia Garcia, Chihuahua, Mexico. Canis Lupus-Griseus Sabine, in Franklin, 1823:654, not Griseus C.
    [Show full text]
  • North American Fauna
    North AmericAN FAuNA united States Department of the interior Fish And Wildlife Service Contents Pages Abstract ..........................................................1 Introduction. ......................................................2 Scope and intent . ................................................2 Approach taken in this review . ....................................2 Limitations of the available data ..................................2 Delimitation of species . .........................................4 Consideration of admixture in delimiting species . ..................6 Delimiting subspecies of Canis lupus ...............................6 Biology of the Species. .............................................10 Taxonomic background on wolf species and subspecies . ...............10 History and overview of the genus Canis...........................10 Canis in North America . ........................................10 Red wolf ....................................................12 Gray wolf subspecies. ........................................12 Ecology, behavior, prey, and habitat . ...............................13 Taxonomic Evaluation and Discussion . ..............................13 Species limits of Canis lupus relative to eastern wolf ...................14 Morphometrics . ............................................14 Autosomal microsatellite DNA . .................................15 Single-nucleotide polymorphisms.................................15 Mitochondrial and Y-chromosome haplotypes. .....................19 Functional
    [Show full text]
  • Canis Lupus. L
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USGS Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for 1974 Canis lupus. L. David Mech USGS Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsnpwrc Part of the Animal Sciences Commons, Behavior and Ethology Commons, Biodiversity Commons, Environmental Policy Commons, Recreation, Parks and Tourism Administration Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Mech, L. David, "Canis lupus." (1974). USGS Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center. 334. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsnpwrc/334 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USGS Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. MAMMALIAN SPECIES No. 37, pp. 1-6, 5 figs. Canis lupus. By L. David Mech Published 2 May 1974 by The American Society of Mammalogists Canis lupus Linnaeus, 1758 House, Saskatchewan, Canada (synonyms are Lupus- Gray Wolf Griseus Sabine, and knightii Anderson). C. 1. pambasileus Elliot, 1905:79, see above. Canis lupus Linnaeus, 1758:39. Type locality Sweden. C. 1. tundrarum Miller, 1912:1, see above. Canis lycaon Schreber, 1775:pl. 89. Type locality Quebec, C. 1. baileyi Nelson and Goldman, 1929:165. Type locality Quebec, by restriction (Goldman, 1937:38). Colonia Garcia, Chihuahua, Mexico. Canis Lupus-Griseus Sabine, in Franklin, 1823:654, not Griseus C. 1. hattai Kishida, 1931:73. Type locality Sapporo, Hok- Boddaert, 1794. kaido, Japan (rex Pocock is a synonym).
    [Show full text]