Covid-19: Implications for Localisation. a Case Study of Afghanistan and Pakistan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Covid-19: Implications for Localisation. a Case Study of Afghanistan and Pakistan HPG working paper Covid-19: implications for localisation A case study of Afghanistan and Pakistan Zaki Ullah, Saeed Ullah Khan and Eranda Wijewickrama June 2021 Readers are encouraged to reproduce material for their own publications, as long as they are not being sold commercially. ODI requests due acknowledgement and a copy of the publication. For online use, we ask readers to link to the original resource on the ODI website. The views presented in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of ODI or our partners. This work is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. How to cite: Ullah, Z., Ullah Khan, S. and Wijewickrama, E. (2021) Covid-19: implications for localisation. A case study of Afghanistan and Pakistan. HPG working paper. London: ODI (https://odi.org/en/publications/covid-19-implications-for-localisation-a-case-study-of-afghanistan- and-pakistan). This PDF has been prepared in accordance with good practice on accessibility. Cover photo: Covid-19 disinfection in Garhi Yaseen Market in District Shikarpur, Sindh, Pakistan. Credit: Syed Aatif Shah/ACTED Acknowledgements The research team would like to thank the many people who contributed to this paper, including national and international actors in Afghanistan and Pakistan who participated in the research, the peer reviewers who shared their insights, and the members of the Humanitarian Policy Group (HPG) who supported the development of the report. Thanks to Laura Mertsching (HPG) for project management; Eleanor Davey (Humanitarian Advisory Group (HAG)) for editing this paper; and Hannah Bass (HPG) for design and production. Research team: Eranda Wijewickrama and Nathaniel Rose from HAG; Zaki Ullah, Saeed Ullah Khan and Muhammad Haroon from GLOW Consultants (Pvt) Limited. Peer reviewers: Dr Muhammad Kashif Saeed, Coordinator, Development Action Cell, University of Peshawar; Nicholas Ross, Project Manager, Samuel Hall Afghanistan; Saida Azimi, National Researcher, Samuel Hall Afghanistan; and Veronique Barbelet, Senior Research Fellow, HPG. About this paper As part of ongoing research on how Covid-19 has influenced the localisation of humanitarian aid, HPG partnered with HAG and GLOW Consultants, Pakistan to carry out this study across Afghanistan and Pakistan. The purpose of this study was to review the impact of Covid-19 on shifts towards more locally led humanitarian action in these countries and the potential broader implications for the sector as a whole. About the authors Zaki Ullah is a Team Leader at GLOW Consultants (Pvt) Ltd. Saeed Ullah Khan is the Principal Consultant at GLOW Consultants (Pvt) Ltd. Eranda Wijewickrama is a Leader at Humanitarian Advisory Group (HAG). About GLOW Consultants (Private) Limited and Humanitarian Advisory Group GLOW Consultants, based in Pakistan, is a leading national entity providing practice solutions and field implementation support to donors, their implementing partners and research institutions. GLOW has successfully completed more than 100 third-party monitoring and evaluation (M&E) assignments. Humanitarian Advisory Group (HAG) was founded in 2012 to elevate the profile of humanitarian action in Asia and the Pacific. Set up as a social enterprise, HAG provides a unique space for thinking, research, technical advice and training that contributes to excellence in humanitarian practice. Contents Acknowledgements / 3 List of boxes, tables and figures / 5 Acronyms / 6 Executive summary / 7 Key findings / 7 Recommendations / 9 1 Introduction / 11 1.1 Background / 11 1.2 Purpose of the study and key questions / 11 1.3 Study methodology / 12 1.4 The humanitarian and Covid-19 context in Afghanistan and Pakistan / 15 2 Impact of Covid-19 on the humanitarian sectors in Afghanistan and Pakistan / 19 2.1 Increase in needs and funding / 19 3 Impact of Covid-19 on localisation in Afghanistan and Pakistan / 24 3.1 Coordination / 24 3.2 Leadership / 28 3.3 Partnerships / 29 3.4 Funding / 32 3.5 Capacity / 38 4 Conclusion / 42 4.1 What does this mean for localisation in Afghanistan and Pakistan? / 42 4.2 Recommendations / 44 References / 46 Appendix 1 Qualitative data analysis approach / 50 List of boxes, tables and figures Boxes Box 1 Defining localisation / 12 Box 2 Measuring Localisation Framework / 13 Box 3 The changing humanitarian operational context in Afghanistan / 16 Box 4 The changing humanitarian operational context in Pakistan / 18 Box 5 Cultural challenges in responding to Covid-19 / 22 Box 6 Insights: utilising radio as a tool to support hard-to-reach communities in Afghanistan / 23 Box 7 Coordination forums in Afghanistan and Pakistan / 25 Box 8 Attendance versus participation in digital coordination forums / 27 Box 9 New partnerships – corporate sector / 30 Box 10 Determining equitable use of pooled fund resources / 36 Tables Table 1 Details of interviews conducted / 14 Table 2 Details of survey respondents / 14 Table 3 Humanitarian funding needs and contributions in Afghanistan and Pakistan / 33 Table 4 Total Country-Based Pooled Fund direct funding allocation to local and national organisations / 35 Figures Figure 1 Trends in humanitarian needs in Afghanistan and Pakistan / 20 Figure 2 To what extent are international organisations respecting and working with local/national organisations? (Survey responses according to type of organisation represented) / 32 Figure 3 Humanitarian funding distribution in Afghanistan and Pakistan in 2020 (by funding recipient organisation type) / 34 Figure 4 What has been Covid-19’s impact on the funding available to organisations? (Survey responses according to type of organisation represented) / 35 Figure 5 Has Covid-19 resulted in increased flexibility in the available funding? (Survey responses according to type of organisation represented) / 36 Figure 6 How has Covid-19 impacted your organisation’s work with respect to staff/human resource capacity? / 38 Figure 7 How much are international organisations helping to strengthen the capacity of local/ national organisations? (Survey responses according to type of organisation represented) / 39 Figure 8 Will Covid-19 impacts on localisation result in long-term change in humanitarian sector operations? (Survey responses according to type of organisation represented) / 43 Figure A1 Coding hierarchical structure / 50 Figure A2 Utilisation of the codes for analysis / 51 Acronyms ACBAR Agency Coordinating Body for Afghan Relief and Development CBPF Country-Based Pooled Fund COAR Citizens Organisations for Advocacy and Resilience CSO civil society organisation HAG Humanitarian Advisory Group HCT Humanitarian Country Team IASC Inter-Agency Standing Committee IDP internally displaced person IOM International Organisation for Migration INGO international non-governmental organisation KII key informant interview LNO local and/or national organisation NALPER Nigeria Afghanistan Localised Preparedness Emergency Response NDMA National Disaster Management Authority NGO non-governmental organisation NHN National Humanitarian Network NIH National Institute of Health, Pakistan NNGO national non-governmental organisation NOC No Objection Certificate PHF Pakistan Humanitarian Forum PIANGO Pacific Island Association of NGOs PKR Pakistani Rupee PPE personal protective equipment SOP standard operating procedures UN United Nations UNOCHA United Nations Office of Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNICEF United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund WASH water, sanitation and hygiene WHO World Health Organization 7 HPG working paper Executive summary Since the beginning of 2020, across the world, Covid-19 restrictions and risks have forced international actors to place greater focus on localisation, more from necessity than choice. In Afghanistan and Pakistan, the Covid-19 pandemic has the potential to deliver a timely boost for the localisation process, but to date the shift has been partial, rarely upending established power inequalities. During the pandemic, the ability to reach local communities in hard-to-access areas became a core asset – local and national organisations (LNOs) with the capacity to reach vulnerable communities achieved greater recognition and received more support. However, this came without structural change to reflect the centrality of LNOs in the response. Covid-19 has forced the adoption of new working practices, highlighted the positive role of LNOs in handling the humanitarian response in Pakistan and Afghanistan and strengthening the locally led response. Crucially, increased funding was channelled to LNOs during the pandemic, but not at a scale that recognised their true contribution. Small local organisations rarely accessed increased funding; instead, international non-governmental organisations (INGOs) preferred partnerships with established or larger national organisations. While remote working created opportunities for increased participation, these gains were still affected by digital inequalities. As the humanitarian sector works to respond to growing need and changing operational requirements, the pandemic presents a critical opportunity to transition to a more locally led response model in these countries. While significant challenges remain in both contexts, localisation has emerged as an important principle in the way forward, building on global momentum in this area. However, it remains to be seen if there is a willingness to make fundamental, system-wide changes that will lead to a context-relevant, locally led response model in the
Recommended publications
  • Post 9/11 Trends: Bush to Obama to Trump (Multilateralism and Peace Initiatives in Afghanistan)
    Citation: Khokhar, W., Jamil, T., & Hussain, Q. A. (2021). Post 9/11 Trends: Bush to Obama to Trump (Multilateralism and Peace Initiatives in Afghanistan). Global Political Review, VI(I), 37-49. https://doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2021(VI-I).04 Waseem Khokhar * | Tahir Jamil † | Qamar Abid Hussain ‡ Post 9/11 Trends: Bush to Obama to Trump (Multilateralism and Peace Initiatives in Afghanistan) Vol. VI, No. I (Winter 2021) URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2021(VI-I).04 Pages: 37 – 49 p- ISSN: 2521-2982 e- ISSN: 2707-4587 p- ISSN: 2521-2982 DOI: 10.31703/gpr.2021(VI-I).04 Headings Abstract The overall U.S. strategy in Afghanistan lacks clarity and consistently coordinated efforts/policies to bring peace in the • Theme of Study war-torn country. From the Bush to Obama and Trump administrations, • Introduction the situation remains complex, and ambiguity prevails on the future of • Multilateral Approach Afghanistan and achievements; therefore, the U.S. needs to think outside • Obama: Afpak and Counter- the box to emerge from this turbulent 19 years-long war. No single country can bring peace and security in Afghanistan due to its complex and diverse Terrorism Strategy nature of issues, its history of conflicts and unsettled domestic issues, which • Obama’s Afghanistan Strategy divided the nation into different tribes and factions. The continuity in using • Withdrawal of U.S. Forces soft and smart powers, a multilateral approach, along with Principal-Agent • Peace in Intra-Afghan Dialogue theory, would help to further pave the way forward for bringing peace in • Helping Central Govt Afghanistan.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan | Agricultural Livelihoods and Food Security in the Context of COVID-19: Monitoring Report – August 2021
    AFGHANISTAN Agricultural livelihoods and food security in the context of COVID-19 Monitoring report August 2021 AFGHANISTAN Agricultural livelihoods and food security in the context of COVID-19 Monitoring report August 2021 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, 2021 REQUIRED CITATION FAO. 2021. Afghanistan | Agricultural livelihoods and food security in the context of COVID-19: Monitoring report – August 2021. Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb6398en The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dashed lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. ISBN 978-92-5-134842-0 © FAO, 2021 Some rights reserved. This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc- sa/3.0/igo/legalcode). Under the terms of this licence, this work may be copied, redistributed and adapted for non-commercial purposes, provided that the work is appropriately cited. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that FAO endorses any specific organization, products or services.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 / 7 Eimnamen
    Postadresse: Erdbergstraße 192 – 196 1030 Wien Tel: +43 1 601 49 – 0 Fax: + 43 1 711 23-889 15 41 E-Mail: [email protected] www.bvwg.gv.at ENTSCHEIDUNGSDATUM 0 5 . 0 5 . 2 0 2 1 GESCHÄFTSZAHL W156 2194215 - 2 / 7 E IM NAMEN DER REPUBLI K! Das Bundesverwaltungsgericht erkennt durch die Richterin Mag. Alexandra KREBITZ über die Beschwerde von XXXX , geboren am XXXX , Staatsangehöriger von Afghanistan, vertreten durch BBU Bundesagentur für Betreuungs- und Unterstützungsleistungen GmbH, gegen den Bescheid des Bundesamtes für Fremdenwesen und Asyl vom 01.04.2021, Zl. XXXX , zu Recht: A) Die Beschwerde wird als unbegründet abgewiesen. B) Die Revision ist gemäß Art. 133 Abs. 4 B-VG nicht zulässig. Entscheidungsgründe: I. Verfahrensgang: Der BF stellte erstmals am 20.01.2016 einen Antrag auf internationalen Schutz. Dieser Antrag wurde im Rechtsmittelweg vom Bundesverwaltungsgericht mit Erkenntnis vom 23.09.2019, W158 2194215-1/9E als unbegründet abgewiesen und erwuchs in Rechtskraft. Im Beschwerdeverfahren vor dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht wurde am 21.08.2019 eine mündliche Beschwerdeverhandlung durchgeführt, an der der BF und seine Rechtsvertreterin teilnahmen. Im Rahmen der mündlichen Beschwerdeverhandlung wurde der BF im Beisein einer Dolmetscherin für die Sprache Dari u.a. zu seiner Identität und Herkunft, zu den persönlichen Lebensumständen, zu seinem Gesundheitszustand, seinen Familienangehörigen, seinen Fluchtgründen und Rückkehrbefürchtungen sowie zu seinem - 2 - Privat- und Familienleben in Österreich befragt. Zu Gesundheitszustand gab der BF an, dass er im Dezember 2016 krank gewesen sei, jetzt aber wieder gesund. Seine Krankheit kehre alle 3 – 4 Monate zurück, er nehme dann Medikamente und dann werde es besser. Zum Gesundheitszustand wurde im abweisenden Erkenntnis vom 18.11.2019 ausgeführt, dass der BF gesund und arbeitsfähig sei.
    [Show full text]
  • Taliban, Terrorism and War on Terror: Assessing US Involvement in Afghanistan Introduction 1.1
    Article Kardan Journal of Social Taliban, Terrorism and War on Sciences and Humanities Terror: Assessing US 3 (2) 47–67 Involvement in Afghanistan ©2020 Kardan University Kardan Publications Kabul, Afghanistan https://kardan.edu.af/Research/ Sidiqullah Sahel CurrentIssue.aspx?j=KJSSH Abstract It has been 19 years of September 11 tragedy, in response United States waged a war against perpetrators. The country with some NATO member countries took the lead in war against terror, and started Operation enduring freedom on 7th October 2001, to topple the Taliban regime, and Eliminate terrorist organizations from its roots. For the purpose to be achieved, USA convened a conference in Bonn Germany, comprising All Jihadist groups, except Taliban and Hezbe Islami Hekmatyar, for formation of new administration and sharing power. Hamid Karzai was appointed as head of new interim administration in the conference on 5th December 2001, and gradually ISAF under NATO deployed around the country to suppress Taliban and Al-Qaeda forces. After 20 years of war in Afghanistan, USA could defeat neither international terrorism, nor Taliban militarily, but instead it exacerbated the security conditions of the country, and led to creation of a greater number of terrorist organizations. USA finally decided to withdraw all its forces from Afghanistan through an agreement signed between USA and Taliban on 29th February 2020. now the Question arises whether US has achieved what they wanted to? whether the country succeeded in state- building in Afghanistan? The paper finds out, that absence of unanimity and perfect policy regarding Taliban amongst Afghan statesmen and US is one of momentous reasons for prolonging Afghan war, and After crumbling the regime of Taliban, USA did not have any specific policy for state-building or rehabilitation in Afghanistan, instead their intention at that time was that of retaliation and counter-terrorism.
    [Show full text]
  • DANISH REFUGEE COUNCIL 1 April 2021 – 30 June 2021
    YEAR 2 – Q4 PROGRESS REPORT AFGHAN DIASPORA INFORMATION PROJECT - ADIP DRC – MMC ASIA & DIASPORA PROGRAMME Third QUARTERLY REPORT YEAR 2 DANISH REFUGEE COUNCIL 1 April 2021 – 30 June 2021 PROJECT TITLE: Enhancing protection information for displaced people from Afghanistan through collaborative engagement with diaspora communities in Europe DURATION: June 2019 – June 2022 TARGET COUNTRIES: Afghanistan, Denmark, Germany, Netherlands DONOR: Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Migration Management Grant) DRC TEAM: Diaspora Programme in Denmark, Mixed Migration Centre/Regional Office Asia OBJECTIVE: Afghans on the move and Afghans considering migrating through irregular means have a realistic and credible picture of the journey, understand the protection risks and their rights 1 YEAR 2 – Q4 PROGRESS REPORT AFGHAN DIASPORA INFORMATION PROJECT - ADIP DRC – MMC ASIA & DIASPORA PROGRAMME 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The project “Enhancing protection information for displaced people from Afghanistan through collaborative engagement with diaspora communities in Europe” named in the report the Afghan Diaspora Information Project (ADIP) focuses on enhancing protection information for displaced people from Afghanistan through collaborative engagement with diaspora communities in Europe. The 36-months project aims to support members of the Afghan diaspora in Denmark, Germany and the Netherlands to engage with migrants and refugees in a way that reduces protection risks. During the reporting period the six diaspora partners received the pre-testing recommendations on their campaign materials and revised their materials for the second round of message testing in Afghanistan. All the organisations received additional mentoring sessions to discuss the feedbacks and the necessary adjustments. An online training on Protection Information was conducted for Afghan diaspora without prior knowledge on protection on 27 May 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan-Background Note-V1.0(December 2020)
    Country Background Note: Afghanistan Version 1.0 December 2020 Preface Purpose This note provides a summary of and links to country of origin information (COI) for use by Home Office decision makers handling particular types of protection and human rights claims. It is not intended to be an exhaustive survey of a particular subject or theme. It is split into two main sections: (1) general background to the country concerned, including demography and geography; and (2) issues which may be relevant to protection claims. Unlike country policy and information notes, it does not contain an assessment of risk, availability of protection or reasonableness of internal relocation. Decision makers must, however, still consider all claims on an individual basis, taking into account each case’s specific facts. Country of origin information The country information in this note has been carefully selected in accordance with the general principles of COI research as set out in the Common EU [European Union] Guidelines for Processing Country of Origin Information (COI), dated April 2008, and the Austrian Centre for Country of Origin and Asylum Research and Documentation’s (ACCORD), Researching Country Origin Information – Training Manual, 2013. Namely, taking into account the COI’s relevance, reliability, accuracy, balance, currency, transparency and traceability. The structure and content of the country information section follows a terms of reference which sets out the general and specific topics relevant to this note. All information included in the note was published or made publicly available on or before the ‘cut-off’ date in the country information section. Any event taking place or report/article published after this date is not included.
    [Show full text]
  • In 2019, UNHCR Focused on Securing Durable Solutions Through Voluntary
    REGIONAL SUMMARIES I ASIA AND THE PACIFIC REGIONAL SUMMARIES I ASIA AND THE PACIFIC REGIONAL SUMMARIES Asia and the Pacific In 2019, UNHCR focused on securing durable solutions through “ voluntary return, resettlement and complementary pathways. Hand-in-hand with these were efforts to expand support to refugees, IDPs, stateless persons and communities generously hosting them. However, greater international burden- and responsibility-sharing, in the spirit of the Global Compact on Refugees, is needed to provide vital assistance to refugees and their host communities, and to support governments in further advancing inclusive policies. ” —Indrika Ratwatte, Director, Regional Bureau for Asia and the Pacific A Rohingya refugee watches over his great-granddaughter at Kutupalong refugee settlement. While fleeing from violence at home in Myanmar, his wife and two sons were murdered, and he arrived with just one great-granddaughter. © UNHCR/Kamrul Hasan 110 UNHCR GLOBAL REPORT 2019 UNHCR GLOBAL REPORT 2019 111 REGIONAL SUMMARIES I ASIA AND THE PACIFIC REGIONAL SUMMARIES I ASIA AND THE PACIFIC MAJOR SITUATIONS OR OPERATIONS IN In 2019, progress in resolving the root causes of displacement stalled, meaning durable solutions remained out of reach for most people of concern to UNHCR in the region. However, in collaboration with governments and other ASIA AND THE PACIFIC IN 2019 partners, UNHCR made continued progress in securing the inclusion of the displaced in national systems. MYANMAR KEY RESULTS AND ACHIEVEMENTS Situation L2 Level of emergency The majority of refugees and stateless persons from Myanmar are Rohingya, 15,000 individuals in Myanmar for whom durable solutions and access to basic rights such as freedom of benefited from 16 community CRRF country Refugee camp movement, livelihoods and education remained elusive, whether at home in infrastructure projects and Myanmar or in exile abroad.
    [Show full text]
  • AFGHANISTAN SITUATION Tradesmen Work to Build a House in Tarakhil Daag, a Suburb of Kabul City, Afghanistan
    AFGHANISTAN SITUATION Tradesmen work to build a house in Tarakhil Daag, a suburb of Kabul city, Afghanistan. While the local community, returnees and IDPs live adjacently, the groups generally have limited interaction. UNHCR’s community-based protection project aims, in part, to promote peaceful coexistence between different segments of the community, particularly as more returnees and IDPs are expected to settle here in the coming years. With the crisis in Afghanistan entering its fifth decade, Afghans are the second largest refugee population under UNHCR’s mandate globally. Pakistan remains the world’s second largest UNHCR’s overall requirements for the Afghanistan refugee-hosting country for refugees under situation in 2020 stand at $273.5 million. As of UNHCR’s mandate, and the Islamic Republic of Iran 25 August 2020, $86.6 million have been ranks sixth. The Solutions Strategy for Afghan received. Flexible funds received by UNHCR have Refugees (SSAR) provides the overarching policy allowed the organization to allocate an additional and operational framework for strengthening $25.4 million to the Afghanistan situation, raising support to host countries while creating the the current funding level to 41%. These low conditions for sustainable return and reintegration; funding levels have forced UNHCR’s operations in augmented by a support platform under the Global Afghanistan and in neighbouring countries to cut Compact on Refugees launched in 2019 and or reduce programmes across a range of sectors, AFGHANISTAN focused on resilience and youth empowerment including protection monitoring, health services, through education, health and skills. In addition, school construction and vocational skills training, with more than 400,000 new conflict-induced IDPs with further reductions expected in the second SITUATION recorded in 2019 in Afghanistan, UNHCR continued half of 2020 should more funding not be received.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan: Die Aktuelle Sicherheitslage
    Afghanistan: Die aktuelle Sicherheitslage Update der SFH-Länderanalyse Corinne Troxler Bern, 30. September 2020 Angaben zum Autor/zur Autorin: Corinne Troxler hat an der Universität Zürich Geschichte, Politikwissenschaft und Völkerrecht studiert. Sie verfügt über langjährige Erfahrung im Asylbereich, als Expertin der SFH. Sie reiste mehrmals nach Afghanistan und nahm unter anderem an drei Fact Finding Missions teil. In eigenständiger Feldforschung ergänzte sie die Eindrücke und setzte sich unter ande- rem intensiv mit der Lage der Frauen auseinander. Daneben lernte sie an den Universitäten Zürich und Bern sowie in Afghanistan und Iran Persisch und Dari. Im Rahmen des Certificate of Advanced Studies in Civilian Peacebuilding 2012/13 hat sich die Autorin erneut intensiv mit Afghanistan in den Bereichen Staatenbildung / fragile Staaten, Vergangenheitsbewälti- gung, Mediation und Gender auseinandergesetzt. 2013 bis 2020 führte sie mehrere Informa- tions- und Weiterbildungsveranstaltungen zu Afghanistan durch und war für «Schweizer Ju- gend forscht» im Rahmen des Nationalen Wettbewerbs 2017 als Afghanistan -Expertin tätig. Impressum Herausgeberin Schweizerische Flüchtlingshilfe SFH Postfach, 3001 Bern Tel. 031 370 75 75 Fax 031 370 75 00 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.fluechtlingshilfe.ch Spendenkonto: PC 30-1085-7 Sprachversionen deutsch COPYRIGHT © 2020 Schweizerische Flüchtlingshilfe SFH, Bern Kopieren und Abdruck unter Quellenangabe erlaubt. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Einleitung .............................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan INDIVIDUALS
    CONSOLIDATED LIST OF FINANCIAL SANCTIONS TARGETS IN THE UK Last Updated:01/02/2021 Status: Asset Freeze Targets REGIME: Afghanistan INDIVIDUALS 1. Name 6: ABBASIN 1: ABDUL AZIZ 2: n/a 3: n/a 4: n/a 5: n/a. DOB: --/--/1969. POB: Sheykhan village, Pirkowti Area, Orgun District, Paktika Province, Afghanistan a.k.a: MAHSUD, Abdul Aziz Other Information: (UK Sanctions List Ref):AFG0121 (UN Ref): TAi.155 (Further Identifiying Information):Key commander in the Haqqani Network (TAe.012) under Sirajuddin Jallaloudine Haqqani (TAi.144). Taliban Shadow Governor for Orgun District, Paktika Province as of early 2010. Operated a training camp for non Afghan fighters in Paktika Province. Has been involved in the transport of weapons to Afghanistan. INTERPOL-UN Security Council Special Notice web link: https://www.interpol.int/en/How-we- work/Notices/View-UN-Notices-Individuals click here. Listed on: 21/10/2011 Last Updated: 01/02/2021 Group ID: 12156. 2. Name 6: ABDUL AHAD 1: AZIZIRAHMAN 2: n/a 3: n/a 4: n/a 5: n/a. Title: Mr DOB: --/--/1972. POB: Shega District, Kandahar Province, Afghanistan Nationality: Afghan National Identification no: 44323 (Afghan) (tazkira) Position: Third Secretary, Taliban Embassy, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates Other Information: (UK Sanctions List Ref):AFG0094 (UN Ref): TAi.121 (Further Identifiying Information): Belongs to Hotak tribe. Review pursuant to Security Council resolution 1822 (2008) was concluded on 29 Jul. 2010. INTERPOL-UN Security Council Special Notice web link: https://www.interpol.int/en/How-we-work/ Notices/View-UN-Notices-Individuals click here. Listed on: 23/02/2001 Last Updated: 01/02/2021 Group ID: 7055.
    [Show full text]
  • Ctc Sentinel 042021
    OBJECTIVE ·· RELEVANT ·· RIGOROUS || JUNE/JULYAPRIL/MAY 2018 2021 · ·VOLUME VOLUME 11, 14, ISSUE ISSUE 6 4 A VIEWFEATURE FROM THE ARTICLE CT FOXHOLE A VIEWFEATURE FROM THE ARTICLE CT FOXHOLE TenThe Years Jihadi On: Threat Inside T h e J a n u a r y 6 LTC(R)Boost Bryan to Price theto Bin Indonesia Ladin Raid Accelerationism A Conversation with Admiral (Retired) Brian Former Hughes Director, and William H. McRavenKirsten and E. Schulze Nicholas Rasmussen CombatingCynthia Terrorism miller-idriss Center INTERVIEW Editor in Chief 1 A View from the CT Foxhole: Admiral (Retired) William H. McRaven, Former Commander, U.S. Special Operations Command, and Nicholas Paul Cruickshank Rasmussen, Former National Counterterrorism Center Director, Reflect on the Usama bin Ladin Raid Managing Editor Audrey Alexander Kristina Hummel FEATURE ARTICLE EDITORIAL BOARD 12 Uniting for Total Collapse: The January 6 Boost to Accelerationism Colonel Suzanne Nielsen, Ph.D. Brian Hughes and Cynthia Miller-Idriss Department Head Dept. of Social Sciences (West Point) ANALYSIS Lieutenant Colonel Sean Morrow 19 The March 2021 Palma Attack and the Evolving Jihadi Terror Threat to Director, CTC Mozambique Tim Lister Brian Dodwell 28 The Revival of the Pakistani Taliban Executive Director, CTC Abdul Sayed and Tore Hamming Don Rassler 39 A New Approach Is Necessary: The Policy Ramifications of the April 2021 Loyalist Violence in Northern Ireland Director of Strategic Initiatives, CTC Aaron Edwards CONTACT Ten years ago, the United States launched Operation Neptune Spear, the Combating Terrorism Center May 2011 raid on Usama bin Ladin’s compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan, U.S. Military Academy which resulted in the death of al-Qa`ida’s founder.
    [Show full text]
  • Peace Negotiations on Afghanistan in the 21 Century
    Sophia Khatri Peace Negotiations on Afghanistan in st the 21 Century A Comparative Analysis of Bonn 2001 and Doha 2020 Kieler Analysen zur Sicherheitspolitik Nr. 51 August 2021 Table of Contents: Abstract ..................................................................................................................................1 1. Introduction .....................................................................................................................2 1.1 Literature Review .....................................................................................................3 1.2 Relevance of the Study .............................................................................................4 1.3 Objective and Research Questions ............................................................................4 1.4 Structure ...................................................................................................................4 2. Methodological Framework .............................................................................................5 2.1 Sources of Information .............................................................................................5 2.2 Limitations and Delimitations ...................................................................................6 2.3 Definition of Terms ..................................................................................................6 3. The Conference in Bonn ..................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]