Glossary of Terms for the Electric Utility Industry
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Water Drop Patch Project Making a Difference
United States Office of Water Environmental Protection (4501T) March 2008 Agency Washington, DC 20460 EPA 840-B-07-001 _________________________________________________________________________ Water Drop Patch Project Photo courtesy of GSUSA Making a Difference Acknowledgments Authors Meghan Klasic (author of new version of patch manual) Oak Ridge Institude of Science and Education Intern, USEPA Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds Patricia Scott (co-author of original patch manual) USEPA’s Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds Karen Brown (co-author of original patch manual) Retired, Girl Scout Council of the Nation’s Capital Editor Martha Martin, Tetra Tech, Inc. Contributors A great big thanks also goes out to the following people and organizations for their contributions, including images, photographs, text, formatting, and overall general knowledge: Jodi Stewart Schwarzer, Project Manager, Environmental & Outdoor Program Girl Scouts of the USA’s Environmental and Outdoor Program, Linking Girls to the Land Elliott Wildlife Values Project Kathleen Cullinan, Manager, Environmental & Outdoor Program Girl Scouts of the USA’s Environmental and Outdoor Program Matthew Boone, Kelly Brzezinski, Aileen Molloy, Scott Morello, American Horticultural Society, Fish and Wildlife Service, Girl Scouts of the United States of America, National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration, United States Geological Survey, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. This resource is updated periodically and is available for free through the National Service Center for Environmental Publications (NSCEP) by calling toll-free (800) 490-9198 or e-mailing [email protected]. It is also available online at www.epa.gov/adopt/patch. Inquiries or suggestions related to the project should be directed to Patricia Scott, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20460 (Mail Code 4501T). -
Printer Tech Tips—Cause & Effects of Static Electricity in Paper
Printer Tech Tips Cause & Effects of Static Electricity in Paper Problem The paper has developed a static electrical charge causing an abnormal sheet-to- sheet or sheet-to-material attraction which is difficult to separate. This condition may result in feeder trip-offs, print voids from surface contamination, ink offset, Sappi Printer Technical Service or poor sheet jog in the delivery. 877 SappiHelp (727 7443) Description Static electricity is defined as a non-moving, non-flowing electrical charge or in simple terms, electricity at rest. Static electricity becomes visible and dynamic during the brief moment it sparks a discharge and for that instant it’s no longer at rest. Lightning is the result of static discharge as is the shock you receive just before contacting a grounded object during unusually dry weather. Matter is composed of atoms, which in turn are composed of protons, neutrons, and electrons. The number of protons and neutrons, which make up the atoms nucleus, determine the type of material. Electrons orbit the nucleus and balance the electrical charge of the protons. When both negative and positive are equal, the charge of the balanced atom is neutral. If electrons are removed or added to this configuration, the overall charge becomes either negative or positive resulting in an unbalanced atom. Materials with high conductivity, such as steel, are called conductors and maintain neutrality because their electrons can move freely from atom to atom to balance any applied charges. Therefore, conductors can dissipate static when properly grounded. Non-conductive materials, or insulators such as plastic and wood, have the opposite property as their electrons can not move freely to maintain balance. -
The Ball Lightning Conundrum
most famous deadis due to ball lightning occun-ed in 1752 or 1753, when die Swedish sci entist Professor Georg Wilhelm Richman was The Ball attempting to repeat Benjamin Franklin's observa dons with a lightning rcxl. An eyewitness report ed that when Richman w;is "a foot away from the iron rod, the] looked at die elecuical indicator Lightning again; just then a palish blue ball of fire, ;LS big as a fist, came out of die rod without any contaa whatst:)ever. It went right to the forehead of die Conundrum professor , who in diat instant fell back without uttering a sound."' Somedmes a luminous globe is said to rapidly descend 6own die path of a linear lightning WILLIAM D STANSFIELD strike and stop near the ground at die impact site. It may dien hover motionless in mid-air or THE EXISTENCE OF BALL UGHTNING HAS move randomly, but most often horizontally, at been questioned for hundreds of years. Today, die relatively slow velocities of walking speed. the phenomenon is a realit>' accepted by most Sometimes it touches or bounces along or near scientists, but how it is foniied and maintiiined the ground, or travels inside buildings, along has yet to be tully explained. Uncritical observers walls, or over floors before being extingui.shed. of a wide variety of glowing atmospheric entities Some balls have been observed to travel along may be prone to call tliem bail lightning. Open- power lines or fences. Wind does not .seem to minded skepdas might wish to delay judgment have any influence on how diese balls move. -
Viscosity Loss and Hydraulic Pressure Drop on Multilayer Separate Polymer Injection in Concentric Dual-Tubing
energies Article Viscosity Loss and Hydraulic Pressure Drop on Multilayer Separate Polymer Injection in Concentric Dual-Tubing Yi Zhang 1, Jiexiang Wang 1,*, Peng Jia 2, Xiao Liu 1, Xuxu Zhang 1, Chang Liu 1 and Xiangwei Bai 1 1 School of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China; [email protected] (Y.Z.); [email protected] (X.L.); [email protected] (X.Z.); [email protected] (C.L.); [email protected] (X.B.) 2 College of Pipeline and Civil Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 13 February 2020; Accepted: 23 March 2020; Published: 2 April 2020 Abstract: Multilayer separate polymer injection in concentric dual-tubing is a special method for enhancing oil recovery in later development stage of the multilayer formation. During the injection process, heat exchange occurs among the inner tubing, tubing annulus and formation, making the thermal transfer process more complicated than traditional one. This work focuses on the polymer flowing characteristics during the multilayer separate polymer flooding injection process in the wellbore. A temperature–viscosity numerical model is derived to investigate the influencing factors on polymer dual-tubing injection process. Then, an estimate-correct method is introduced to derive the numerical solutions. Several influences have been discussed, including the axial temperature distribution, viscosity distribution, pressure drop, and flow pattern of polymer. Results show that under low injecting rates, below 5 m3/d, formation temperature will greatly decrease the polymer viscosity. When the injecting rates above 20 m3/d, the polymer just decreases 1–3 mPa s at the bottom · of well, which is really small. -
Offshore Wind Submarine Cable Spacing Guidance
Offshore Wind Submarine Cable Spacing Guidance Contract # E14PC00005 United States Department of Interior Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement December 2014, For Public Use Offshore Wind Submarine Cable Spacing Guidance Contract # E14PC00005 United States Department of Interior Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement December 2014, For Public Use The authors gratefully acknowledge permission of the Crown Estate to base parts of this report on their study “Principles of Cable Routing and Spacing (2012)”, Reference ID 8 in this report Document Control Responsible for Job Title Name Date Signature Chris Sturgeon Cables specialist Jim Hodder Cables specialist Colin Poat Cables specialist Content 2014-12-15 Cables specialist Steven Drew Principal Environmental Consultant Rachel McCall EHS Senior Consultant Tanjia Maynard Checked EHS Senior Consultant Tanjia Maynard 2014-12-15 Approval Principal Engineer Jim Doane 2014-12-15 Copyright: PMSS © Document Reference: 734300670/140708 Signatures in this approval box have checked this document in line with the requirements of QP16 This report has been prepared by TÜV SÜD PMSS and Red Penguin Associates with all reasonable skill and care, within the terms of the contract with the Client. The report contains information from sources and data which we believe to be reliable but we have not confirmed that reliability and make no representation as to their accuracy or completeness. The draft report is confidential to the Client and TÜV SÜD PMSS accepts no responsibility to any third party to whom information in this report may be disclosed. No part of this document may be reproduced without the prior written approval of TÜV SÜD PMSS © TÜV SÜD PMSS 2014 Offshore Wind Submarine Cable Spacing Guidance 1 Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement Table of Contents Abbreviations 2 1. -
Offshore Wind Submarine Cabling Overview Fisheries Technical Working Group
OFFSHOREoverview WIND SUBMARINE CABLING Fisheries Technical Working Group Final Report | Report Number 21-14 | April 2021 NYSERDA’s Promise to New Yorkers: NYSERDA provides resources, expertise, and objective information so New Yorkers can make confident, informed energy decisions. Our Vision: New York is a global climate leader building a healthier future with thriving communities; homes and businesses powered by clean energy; and economic opportunities accessible to all New Yorkers. Our Mission: Advance clean energy innovation and investments to combat climate change, improving the health, resiliency, and prosperity of New Yorkers and delivering benefits equitably to all. Courtesy, Equinor, Dudgeon Offshore Wind Farm Offshore Wind Submarine Cabling Overview Fisheries Technical Working Group Final Report Prepared for: New York State Energy Research and Development Authority Albany, NY Morgan Brunbauer Offshore Wind Marine Fisheries Manager Prepared by: Tetra Tech, Inc. Boston, MA Brian Dresser Director of Fisheries Programs NYSERDA Report 21-14 NYSERDA Contract 111608A April 2021 Notice This report was prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. in the course of performing work contracted for and sponsored by the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (hereafter “NYSERDA”). The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of NYSERDA or the State of New York, and reference to any specific product, service, process, or method does not constitute an implied or expressed recommendation or endorsement of it. Further, NYSERDA, the State of New York, and the contractor make no warranties or representations, expressed or implied, as to the fitness for particular purpose or merchantability of any product, apparatus, or service, or the usefulness, completeness, or accuracy of any processes, methods, or other information contained, described, disclosed, or referred to in this report. -
"New Energy Economy": an Exercise in Magical Thinking
REPORT | March 2019 THE “NEW ENERGY ECONOMY”: AN EXERCISE IN MAGICAL THINKING Mark P. Mills Senior Fellow The “New Energy Economy”: An Exercise in Magical Thinking About the Author Mark P. Mills is a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute and a faculty fellow at Northwestern University’s McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science, where he co-directs an Institute on Manufacturing Science and Innovation. He is also a strategic partner with Cottonwood Venture Partners (an energy-tech venture fund). Previously, Mills cofounded Digital Power Capital, a boutique venture fund, and was chairman and CTO of ICx Technologies, helping take it public in 2007. Mills is a regular contributor to Forbes.com and is author of Work in the Age of Robots (2018). He is also coauthor of The Bottomless Well: The Twilight of Fuel, the Virtue of Waste, and Why We Will Never Run Out of Energy (2005). His articles have been published in the Wall Street Journal, USA Today, and Real Clear. Mills has appeared as a guest on CNN, Fox, NBC, PBS, and The Daily Show with Jon Stewart. In 2016, Mills was named “Energy Writer of the Year” by the American Energy Society. Earlier, Mills was a technology advisor for Bank of America Securities and coauthor of the Huber-Mills Digital Power Report, a tech investment newsletter. He has testified before Congress and briefed numerous state public-service commissions and legislators. Mills served in the White House Science Office under President Reagan and subsequently provided science and technology policy counsel to numerous private-sector firms, the Department of Energy, and U.S. -
Measuring Electricity Voltage Current Voltage Current
Measuring Electricity Electricity makes our lives easier, but it can seem like a mysterious force. Measuring electricity is confusing because we cannot see it. We are familiar with terms such as watt, volt, and amp, but we do not have a clear understanding of these terms. We buy a 60-watt lightbulb, a tool that needs 120 volts, or a vacuum cleaner that uses 8.8 amps, and dont think about what those units mean. Using the flow of water as an analogy can make Voltage electricity easier to understand. The flow of electrons in a circuit is similar to water flowing through a hose. If you could look into a hose at a given point, you would see a certain amount of water passing that point each second. The amount of water depends on how much pressure is being applied how hard the water is being pushed. It also depends on the diameter of the hose. The harder the pressure and the larger the diameter of the hose, the more water passes each second. The flow of electrons through a wire depends on the electrical pressure pushing the electrons and on the Current cross-sectional area of the wire. The flow of electrons can be compared to the flow of Voltage water. The water current is the number of molecules flowing past a fixed point; electrical current is the The pressure that pushes electrons in a circuit is number of electrons flowing past a fixed point. called voltage. Using the water analogy, if a tank of Electrical current (I) is defined as electrons flowing water were suspended one meter above the ground between two points having a difference in voltage. -
Water Heater Formulas and Terminology
More resources http://waterheatertimer.org/9-ways-to-save-with-water-heater.html http://waterheatertimer.org/Figure-Volts-Amps-Watts-for-water-heater.html http://waterheatertimer.org/pdf/Fundamentals-of-water-heating.pdf FORMULAS & FACTS BTU (British Thermal Unit) is the heat required to raise 1 pound of water 1°F 1 BTU = 252 cal = 0.252 kcal 1 cal = 4.187 Joules BTU X 1.055 = Kilo Joules BTU divided by 3,413 = Kilowatt (1 KW) FAHRENHEIT CENTIGRADE 32 0 41 5 To convert from Fahrenheit to Celsius: 60.8 16 (°F – 32) x 5/9 or .556 = °C. 120.2 49 140 60 180 82 212 100 One gallon of 120°F (49°C) water BTU output (Electric) = weighs approximately 8.25 pounds. BTU Input (Not exactly true due Pounds x .45359 = Kilogram to minimal flange heat loss.) Gallons x 3.7854 = Liters Capacity of a % of hot water = cylindrical tank (Mixed Water Temp. – Cold Water – 1⁄ 2 diameter (in inches) Temp.) divided by (Hot Water Temp. x 3.146 x length. (in inches) – Cold Water Temp.) Divide by 231 for gallons. % thermal efficiency = Doubling the diameter (GPH recovery X 8.25 X temp. rise X of a pipe will increase its flow 1.0) divided by BTU/H Input capacity (approximately) 5.3 times. BTU output (Gas) = GPH recovery x 8.25 x temp. rise x 1.0 FORMULAS & FACTS TEMP °F RISE STEEL COPPER Linear expansion of pipe 50° 0.38˝ 0.57˝ – in inches per 100 Ft. 100° .076˝ 1.14˝ 125° .092˝ 1.40˝ 150° 1.15˝ 1.75˝ Grain – 1 grain per gallon = 17.1 Parts Per million (measurement of water hardness) TC-092 FORMULAS & FACTS GPH (Gas) = One gallon of Propane gas contains (BTU/H Input X % Eff.) divided by about 91,250 BTU of heat. -
Lecture 10: Tidal Power
Lecture 10: Tidal Power Chris Garrett 1 Introduction The maintenance and extension of our current standard of living will require the utilization of new energy sources. The current demand for oil cannot be sustained forever, and as scientists we should always try to keep such needs in mind. Oceanographers may be able to help meet society's demand for natural resources in some way. Some suggestions include the oceans in a supportive manner. It may be possible, for example, to use tidal currents to cool nuclear plants, and a detailed knowledge of deep ocean flow structure could allow for the safe dispersion of nuclear waste. But we could also look to the ocean as a renewable energy resource. A significant amount of oceanic energy is transported to the coasts by surface waves, but about 100 km of coastline would need to be developed to produce 1000 MW, the average output of a large coal-fired or nuclear power plant. Strong offshore winds could also be used, and wind turbines have had some limited success in this area. Another option is to take advantage of the tides. Winds and solar radiation provide the dominant energy inputs to the ocean, but the tides also provide a moderately strong and coherent forcing that we may be able to effectively exploit in some way. In this section, we first consider some of the ways to extract potential energy from the tides, using barrages across estuaries or tidal locks in shoreline basins. We then provide a more detailed analysis of tidal fences, where turbines are placed in a channel with strong tidal currents, and we consider whether such a system could be a reasonable power source. -
History and Progress of Fractional–Order Element
296 A. KARTCI, N. HERENCSAR, J. T. MACHADO, L. BRANCIK, HISTORY AND PROGRESS OF FRACTIONAL–ORDER ELEMENT . History and Progress of Fractional–Order Element Passive Emulators: A Review Aslihan KARTCI 1;2, Norbert HERENCSAR 1, Jose Tenreiro MACHADO 3, Lubomir BRANCIK 4 1 Dept. of Telecommunications, Brno University of Technology, Technicka 3082/12, 616 00 Brno, Czech Republic 2 Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia 3 Institute of Engineering, Polytechnic of Porto, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Porto, Portugal 4 Dept. of Radio Electronics, Brno University of Technology, Technicka 3082/12, 616 00 Brno, Czech Republic {kartci, herencsn, brancik}@feec.vutbr.cz, [email protected] Submitted April 5, 2020 / Accepted April 19, 2020 Abstract. This paper presents a state-of-the-art survey where Iαv¹tº denotes the "fractional-order time integral" [3] in the area of fractional-order element passive emulators with an order 0 < α < 1. Figure 1 shows these funda- adopted in circuits and systems. An overview of the different mental components in the frequency domain and possible approximations used to estimate the passive element values fractional-order elements (FOEs) in the four quadrants of by means of rational functions is also discussed. A short com- the complex plane [4]. Their impedance is described as parison table highlights the significance of recent methodolo- Z¹sº = Ksα, where ! is the angular frequency with s = j! gies and their potential for further research. Moreover, the and the phase is given in radians (φ = απ/2) or in degrees pros and cons in emulation of FOEs are analyzed. -
On the Nature of Electric Charge
Vol. 9(4), pp. 54-60, 28 February, 2014 DOI: 10.5897/IJPS2013.4091 ISSN 1992 - 1950 International Journal of Physical Copyright © 2014 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article Sciences http://www.academicjournals.org/IJPS Full Length Research Paper On the nature of electric charge Jafari Najafi, Mahdi 1730 N Lynn ST apt A35, Arlington, VA 22209 USA. Received 10 December, 2013; Accepted 14 February, 2014 A few hundred years have passed since the discovery of electricity and electromagnetic fields, formulating them as Maxwell's equations, but the nature of an electric charge remains unknown. Why do particles with the same charge repel and opposing charges attract? Is the electric charge a primary intrinsic property of a particle? These questions cannot be answered until the nature of the electric charge is identified. The present study provides an explicit description of the gravitational constant G and the origin of electric charge will be inferred using generalized dimensional analysis. Key words: Electric charge, gravitational constant, dimensional analysis, particle mass change. INTRODUCTION The universe is composed of three basic elements; parameters. This approach is of great generality and mass-energy (M), length (L), and time (T). Intrinsic mathematical simplicity that simply and directly properties are assigned to particles, including mass, postulates a hypothesis for the nature of the electric electric charge, and spin, and their effects are applied in charge. Although the final formula is a guesswork based the form of physical formulas that explicitly address on dimensional analysis of electric charges, it shows the physical phenomena. The meaning of some particle existence of consistency between the final formula and properties remains opaque.