DOCSLIB.ORG

Modeling Optical Metamaterials with Strong Spatial Dispersion

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Modeling Optical Metamaterials with Strong Spatial Dispersion Fakultät für Physik Institut für theoretische Festkörperphysik Modeling Optical Metamaterials with Strong Spatial Dispersion M. Sc. Karim Mnasri von der KIT-Fakultät für Physik des Karlsruher Instituts für Technologie (KIT) genehmigte Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines DOKTORS DER NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN (Dr. rer. nat.) Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 29. November 2019 Referent: Prof. Dr. Carsten Rockstuhl (Institut für theoretische Festkörperphysik) Korreferent: Prof. Dr. Michael Plum (Institut für Analysis) KIT – Die Forschungsuniversität in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Erklärung zur Selbstständigkeit Ich versichere, dass ich diese Arbeit selbstständig verfasst habe und keine anderen als die angegebenen Quellen und Hilfsmittel benutzt habe, die wörtlich oder inhaltlich über- nommenen Stellen als solche kenntlich gemacht und die Satzung des KIT zur Sicherung guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis in der gültigen Fassung vom 24. Mai 2018 beachtet habe. Karlsruhe, den 21. Oktober 2019, Karim Mnasri Als Prüfungsexemplar genehmigt von Karlsruhe, den 28. Oktober 2019, Prof. Dr. Carsten Rockstuhl iv To Ouiem and Adam Thesis abstract Optical metamaterials are artificial media made from subwavelength inclusions with un- conventional properties at optical frequencies. While a response to the magnetic field of light in natural material is absent, metamaterials prompt to lift this limitation and to exhibit a response to both electric and magnetic fields at optical frequencies. Due tothe interplay of both the actual shape of the inclusions and the material from which they are made, but also from the specific details of their arrangement, the response canbe driven to one or multiple resonances within a desired frequency band. With such a high number of degrees of freedom, tedious trial-and-error simulations and costly experimen- tal essays are inefficient when considering optical metamaterials in the design of specific applications. Therefore, to be able to discuss metamaterials on equal footing as natural materials and to consider them in the design of functional applications, the homogeniza- tion of optical materials is of utmost importance. Such effective description consists of mapping the optical response of an actual metamaterial to a set of spatially averaged, effective material parameters of a continuum. This step requires that the building blocks from which the metamaterials are made of are small and arranged with sufficient density in space in comparison to the operating wavelength. Often, local material laws have been considered in this mapping process, i.e., metama- terials are frequently modelled at the effective, i.e. the homogeneous level, by an electric permittivity, magnetic permeability, and in case of optical activity, terms that express magneto-electric coupling. Such description is borrowed from natural materials at optical frequencies, where the characteristic length scale is in the subnanometer range. Meta- materials, however, possess a characteristic length that is only slightly smaller than the wavelength of light. Thus, the spatial variations of the fields begin to become important and a local description is not enough to adequately describe the metamaterial at the effective level. In this thesis, we lift this limitation and consider nonlocal constitutive relations in the homogenization process for a realistic modelling of optical metamaterials. Nonlocality means that the effective response of a material at every point depends on the fieldsof light at some distant points or, alternatively, on spatial derivatives of the fields at the same point, or both. We focus on periodic metamaterials with centrosymmetric unit cells with a non-negligible period-to-wavelength ratio and show the importance of retaining nonlocality in the effective description of metamaterials. After introducing the necessary mathematical background, we discuss the physical origin of nonlocality, which in the spatial Fourier domain translates to spatial dispersion, i.e., to a generalized permittivity that depends on the wave vector of light. This can lead to an artificial magnetic response and ultimately to a negative effective index of refraction, and even beyond. Then, the aforementioned generalized permittivity is expanded into a Taylor polynomial of the wave vector up to the fourth order. Dispersion relations describ- ing light propagation in bulk metamaterials that are characterized by such constitutive relations are derived. We discuss the additional mode that emerges with nonlocality. We further, derive the appropriate interface conditions from first principles, in order to study how light couples from one media to another. With the interface conditions at hand, the Fresnel matrices, which ultimately allow us to analytically derive the reflection and transmission coefficients from a slab, are derived. vii viii Finally, we apply this formalism to three metamaterial examples. We show that a nonlocal description captures the properties of actual metamaterials much more accurate than the ordinary local description. Based on the scattering parameter retrieval, the ef- fective material parameters are retrieved from different structures, where the referential reflection and transmission coefficients are numerically calculated with a very highpreci- sion. In the first example, we studied an all-dielectric and isotropic material madeofan array of spheres arranged in a cubic lattice. We find that the optical features such asthe presence of the Brewster angle are better captured with a nonlocal description, especially at frequencies close to the first photonic band gap. In the second example, we investigated the fishnet metamaterial. It has a negative effective refractive index in the studied fre- quency range. We find that a nonlocal description allows to predict the optical properties at oblique incidence, where a local description failed to do so. Further, in the retrieved effective material parameters within the local approach, an unphysical anti-Lorentzian in the permittivity arises. This could be lifted when a nonlocal description is considered. In the third and last example, we studied a wire medium structure, that is a prototypical metamaterial that supports a nonlocal optical response. For this material, a phenomeno- logical approach with nonlocality already exists. We first show that the existing model fundamentally differs from the nonlocal model we have been proposing in this thesis, which suggests that homogenization is not unique and multiple models for an effective description may be used to explain the optical response of a specific metamaterial. We finalize this work by showing the limits of homogenization, and the drawbacks of the proposed retrieval method. In summary, we demonstrate that the nonlocal constitutive relations can describe the optical response much better than local constitutive relations would do. The general for- mulation we choose here can be extended to other kinds of nonlocal constitutive relations and renders our approach applicable to a wide class of centrosymmetric metamaterials. Table of Contents List of Figures xi List of Symbols xi 1 Introduction 1 2 Mathematical Background 9 2.1 Generalized Functions (Distributions) ..................... 10 2.1.1 The spaces D of test functions and D0 of distributions ....... 11 2.1.2 Lebesgue spaces ............................ 13 2.2 Sobolev spaces and weak formulation ..................... 16 2.2.1 The Sobolev Spaces Hk, H(div), and H(curl) ............ 16 2.2.2 Essence of weak formulation ...................... 20 2.3 Generalized Fourier transforms ........................ 23 2.3.1 Fourier transform of functions and the desire for an extended defi- nition .................................. 23 2.3.2 Fourier transform of test functions and of distributions ....... 25 2.3.3 Important Properties of Fourier transforms ............. 26 2.4 Chapter summary and discussion ....................... 28 3 Theoretical Background: Spatial dispersion 31 3.1 Multipoles in macroscopic media ....................... 33 3.2 Constitutive relations and spatial dispersion ................. 36 3.2.1 Field equations and linear constitutive relations ........... 36 3.2.2 Effective medium theory with spatial dispersion ........... 38 3.2.3 Weak spatial dispersion approximation ................ 43 3.3 Causality and Passivity with spatial dispersion ................ 47 3.4 Chapter Summary and concluding remarks .................. 50 4 Homogenization of metamaterials 53 4.1 Dispersion relation and additional modes ................... 54 4.1.1 Dispersion relation of WSD ...................... 55 4.1.2 Dispersion relation of the SYM model ................ 57 4.1.3 Dispersion relation of the SSD model ................. 59 4.2 Additional Interface Conditions ........................ 62 4.2.1 Weak solutions ............................. 64 4.2.2 Derivation of the interface conditions ................. 66 4.3 Establishing the Fresnel Equations ...................... 72 4.3.1 Illumination with TE-polarized light ................. 73 4.3.2 Illumination with TM-polarized light ................. 76 4.3.3 Half-space problem and further remarks ............... 79 4.4 Basic homogenization models ......................... 79 4.4.1 Maxwell-Garnett mixing rule ..................... 79 4.4.2 Nonlocal wire medium model ..................... 82 ix x TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.5 Chapter summary and concluding remarks .................. 85 5 Effective parameter retrieval 87 5.1 S-parameter optimization approach .....................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • P142 Lecture 19
    P142 Lecture 19 SUMMARY Vector derivatives: Cartesian Coordinates Vector derivatives: Spherical Coordinates See Appendix A in “Introduction to Electrodynamics” by Griffiths P142 Preview; Subject Matter P142 Lecture 19 • Electric dipole • Dielectric polarization • Electric fields in dielectrics • Electric displacement field, D • Summary Dielectrics: Electric dipole The electric dipole moment p is defined as p = q d where d is the separation distance between the charges q pointing from the negative to positive charge. Lecture 5 showed that Forces on an electric dipole in E field Torque: Forces on an electric dipole in E field Translational force: Dielectric polarization: Microscopic Atomic polarization: d ~ 10-15 m Molecular polarization: d ~ 10-14 m Align polar molecules: d ~ 10-10 m Competition between alignment torque and thermal motion or elastic forces Linear dielectrics: Three mechanisms typically lead to Electrostatic precipitator Linear dielectric: Translational force: Electrostatic precipitator Extract > 99% of ash and dust from gases at power, cement, and ore-processing plants Electric field in dielectrics: Macroscopic Electric field in dielectrics: Macroscopic Polarization density P in dielectrics: Polarization density in dielectrics: Polarization density in dielectrics: The dielectric constant κe • Net field in a dielectric Enet = EExt/κe • Most dielectrics linear up to dielectric strength Volume polarization density Electric Displacement Field Electric Displacement Field Electric Displacement Field Electric Displacement Field Summary; 1 Summary; 2 Refraction of the electric field at boundaries with dielectrics Capacitance with dielectrics Capacitance with dielectrics Electric energy storage • Showed last lecture that the energy stored in a capacitor is given by where for a dielectric • Typically it is more useful to express energy in terms of magnitude of the electric field E.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Constitutive Relations
    Chapter 3 Constitutive Relations Maxwell’s equations define the fields that are generated by currents and charges. However, they do not describe how these currents and charges are generated. Thus, to find a self-consistent solution for the electromagnetic field, Maxwell’s equations must be supplemented by relations that describe the behavior of matter under the influence of fields. These material equations are known as constitutive relations. The constitutive relations express the secondary sources P and M in terms of the fields E and H, that is P = f[E] and M = f[H].1 According to Eq. (1.19) this is equivalent to D = f[E] and B = f[H]. If we expand these relations into power series ∂D 1 ∂2D D = D + E + E2 + .. (3.1) 0 ∂E 2 ∂E2 E=0 E=0 we find that the lowest-order term depends linearly on E. In most practical situ- ations the interaction of radiation with matter is weak and it suffices to truncate the power series after the linear term. The nonlinear terms come into play when the fields acting on matter become comparable to the atomic Coulomb potential. This is the territory of strong field physics. Here we will entirely focus on the linear properties of matter. 1In some exotic cases we can have P = f[E, H] and M = f[H, E], which are so-called bi- isotropic or bi-anisotropic materials. These are special cases and won’t be discussed here. 33 34 CHAPTER 3. CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS 3.1 Linear Materials The most general linear relationship between D and E can be written as2 ∞ ∞ D(r, t) = ε ε˜(r r′, t t′) E(r′, t′) d3r′ dt′ , (3.2) 0 − − −∞Z−∞Z which states that the response D at the location r and at time t not only depends on the excitation E at r and t, but also on the excitation E in all other locations r′ and all other times t′.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Nature of Electric Charge
    Vol. 9(4), pp. 54-60, 28 February, 2014 DOI: 10.5897/IJPS2013.4091 ISSN 1992 - 1950 International Journal of Physical Copyright © 2014 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article Sciences http://www.academicjournals.org/IJPS Full Length Research Paper On the nature of electric charge Jafari Najafi, Mahdi 1730 N Lynn ST apt A35, Arlington, VA 22209 USA. Received 10 December, 2013; Accepted 14 February, 2014 A few hundred years have passed since the discovery of electricity and electromagnetic fields, formulating them as Maxwell's equations, but the nature of an electric charge remains unknown. Why do particles with the same charge repel and opposing charges attract? Is the electric charge a primary intrinsic property of a particle? These questions cannot be answered until the nature of the electric charge is identified. The present study provides an explicit description of the gravitational constant G and the origin of electric charge will be inferred using generalized dimensional analysis. Key words: Electric charge, gravitational constant, dimensional analysis, particle mass change. INTRODUCTION The universe is composed of three basic elements; parameters. This approach is of great generality and mass-energy (M), length (L), and time (T). Intrinsic mathematical simplicity that simply and directly properties are assigned to particles, including mass, postulates a hypothesis for the nature of the electric electric charge, and spin, and their effects are applied in charge. Although the final formula is a guesswork based the form of physical formulas that explicitly address on dimensional analysis of electric charges, it shows the physical phenomena. The meaning of some particle existence of consistency between the final formula and properties remains opaque.
    [Show full text]
  • Electromagnetism
    Electromagnetism Electric Charge Two types: positive and negative Like charges repel, opposites attract Forces come in a matched pair Each charge pushes or pulls on the other Forces have equal magnitudes and opposite directions Forces increase with decreasing separation Charge is quantized Charge is an intrinsic property of matter Electrons are negatively charged (-1.6 x 10-19 coulomb’s each) Protons are positively charged (+1.6 x 10-19 coulomb’s each) Net charge is the sum of an object’s charges Most objects have zero net charge (neutral – equal numbers of + and -) Electric Fields Charges push on each other through empty space Charge one creates an “electric field” This electric field pushes on charge two An electric field is a structure in space that pushes on electric charge The magnitude of the field is proportional to the magnitude of the force on a test charge The direction of the field is the direction of the force on a positive test charge Magnetic Poles Two Types: north and south Like poles repel, opposites attract Forces come in matched pairs Forces increase with decreasing separation Analogous to electric charges EXCEPT: No isolated magnetic poles have ever been found! Net pole on an object is always zero! Most atoms are magnetic, but most materials are not Atomic magnetism is perfectly cancelled Material is indifferent to nearby magnetic poles Some materials do not have full cancellation Ferromagnetic materials respond to magnetic poles Magnetic Fields A magnetic field is a structure in space that pushes on magnetic poles
    [Show full text]
  • A Beautiful Approach: Transformational Optics
    A beautiful approach: “Transformational optics” [ several precursors, but generalized & popularized by Ward & Pendry (1996) ] warp a ray of light …by warping space(?) [ figure: J. Pendry ] Euclidean x coordinates transformed x'(x) coordinates amazing Solutions of ordinary Euclidean Maxwell equations in x' fact: = transformed solutions from x if x' uses transformed materials ε' and μ' Maxwell’s Equations constants: ε0, μ0 = vacuum permittivity/permeability = 1 –1/2 c = vacuum speed of light = (ε0 μ0 ) = 1 ! " B = 0 Gauss: constitutive ! " D = # relations: James Clerk Maxwell #D E = D – P 1864 Ampere: ! " H = + J #t H = B – M $B Faraday: ! " E = # $t electromagnetic fields: sources: J = current density E = electric field ρ = charge density D = displacement field H = magnetic field / induction material response to fields: B = magnetic field / flux density P = polarization density M = magnetization density Constitutive relations for macroscopic linear materials P = χe E ⇒ D = (1+χe) E = ε E M = χm H B = (1+χm) H = μ H where ε = 1+χe = electric permittivity or dielectric constant µ = 1+χm = magnetic permeability εµ = (refractive index)2 Transformation-mimicking materials [ Ward & Pendry (1996) ] E(x), H(x) J–TE(x(x')), J–TH(x(x')) [ figure: J. Pendry ] Euclidean x coordinates transformed x'(x) coordinates J"JT JµJT ε(x), μ(x) " ! = , µ ! = (linear materials) det J det J J = Jacobian (Jij = ∂xi’/∂xj) (isotropic, nonmagnetic [μ=1], homogeneous materials ⇒ anisotropic, magnetic, inhomogeneous materials) an elementary derivation [ Kottke (2008) ] consider×
    [Show full text]
  • F = BIL (F=Force, B=Magnetic Field, I=Current, L=Length of Conductor)
    Magnetism Joanna Radov Vocab: -Armature- is the power producing part of a motor -Domain- is a region in which the magnetic field of atoms are grouped together and aligned -Electric Motor- converts electrical energy into mechanical energy -Electromagnet- is a type of magnet whose magnetic field is produced by an electric current -First Right-Hand Rule (delete) -Fixed Magnet- is an object made from a magnetic material and creates a persistent magnetic field -Galvanometer- type of ammeter- detects and measures electric current -Magnetic Field- is a field of force produced by moving electric charges, by electric fields that vary in time, and by the 'intrinsic' magnetic field of elementary particles associated with the spin of the particle. -Magnetic Flux- is a measure of the amount of magnetic B field passing through a given surface -Polarized- when a magnet is permanently charged -Second Hand-Right Rule- (delete) -Solenoid- is a coil wound into a tightly packed helix -Third Right-Hand Rule- (delete) Major Points: -Similar magnetic poles repel each other, whereas opposite poles attract each other -Magnets exert a force on current-carrying wires -An electric charge produces an electric field in the region of space around the charge and that this field exerts a force on other electric charges placed in the field -The source of a magnetic field is moving charge, and the effect of a magnetic field is to exert a force on other moving charge placed in the field -The magnetic field is a vector quantity -We denote the magnetic field by the symbol B and represent it graphically by field lines -These lines are drawn ⊥ to their entry and exit points -They travel from N to S -If a stationary test charge is placed in a magnetic field, then the charge experiences no force.
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Charge
    Electric Charge • Electric charge is a fundamental property of atomic particles – such as electrons and protons • Two types of charge: negative and positive – Electron is negative, proton is positive • Usually object has equal amounts of each type of charge so no net charge • Object is said to be electrically neutral Charged Object • Object has a net charge if two types of charge are not in balance • Object is said to be charged • Net charge is always small compared to the total amount of positive and negative charge contained in an object • The net charge of an isolated system remains constant Law of Electric Charges • Charged objects interact by exerting forces on one another • Law of Charges: Like charges repel, and opposite charges attract • The standard unit (SI) of charge is the Coulomb (C) Electric Properties • Electrical properties of materials such as metals, water, plastic, glass and the human body are due to the structure and electrical nature of atoms • Atoms consist of protons (+), electrons (-), and neutrons (electrically neutral) Atom Schematic view of an atom • Electrically neutral atoms contain equal numbers of protons and electrons Conductors and Insulators • Atoms combine to form solids • Sometimes outermost electrons move about the solid leaving positive ions • These mobile electrons are called conduction electrons • Solids where electrons move freely about are called conductors – metal, body, water • Solids where charge can’t move freely are called insulators – glass, plastic Charging Objects • Only the conduction
    [Show full text]
  • Transparent Metamaterials with a Negative Refractive Index Determined by Spatial Dispersion
    Transparent metamaterials with a negative refractive index determined by spatial dispersion V.V. Slabko Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk 660041, Russia Institute of Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Krasnoyarsk 660036, Russia Abstract: The paper considers an opportunity for the creation of an artificial two-component metamaterial with a negative refractive index within the radio and optical frequency band, which possesses a spatial dispersion. It is shown that there exists a spectral region where, under certain ratio of volume fraction unit occupied with components, the metamaterial appears transparent without attenuating the electromagnetic wave passing through it and possessing a phase and group velocity of the opposite sign. 1. Introduction J.B. Pendry in co-authorship papers suggested the idea of possible creation of artificial metamaterials with a negative refractive index in the gigahertz frequency band [1,2]. The idea proceeded from the work by V.G. Veselago where the processes of electromagnetic wave propagation in isotropic materials with simultaneously negative permittivity ( ( ) 0) and magnetic permeability ( ( ) 0) was theoretically considered [3]. The latter leads to negative refraction index ( n 0 ), and phase propagation (wave vector k ) and energy-flow (Poynting vector S ) appear counter-directed, with the left-handed triplet of the vectors of magnetic field, electrical field, and the wave vector. Those were called optical negative-index materials (NIM). Interest to such metamaterials is aroused both by possible observation of extremely unusual properties, e.g. a negative refraction at the materials boundary with positive and negative refractive index, Doppler’s and Vavilov-Cherenkov’s effect, nonlinear wave interactions; and by possibilities in the solution of a number of practical tasks, which can overcome the resolution threshold diffracting limit in optical devices and creation of perfect shielding or “cloaking” [4-7].
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1905.08341V1 [Physics.App-Ph] 20 May 2019 by Discussing the Influence of the Presented Method in Not Yet Conducted for Cylindrical Metasurfaces
    Illusion Mechanisms with Cylindrical Metasurfaces: A General Synthesis Approach Mahdi Safari1, Hamidreza Kazemi2, Ali Abdolali3, Mohammad Albooyeh2;∗, and Filippo Capolino2 1Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada 2Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, CA 92617, USA 3Department of Electrical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Narmak, Tehran, Iran corresponding author: ∗[email protected] We explore the use of cylindrical metasurfaces in providing several illusion mechanisms including scattering cancellation and creating fictitious line sources. We present the general synthesis approach that leads to such phenomena by modeling the metasurface with effective polarizability tensors and by applying boundary conditions to connect the tangential components of the desired fields to the required surface polarization current densities that generate such fields. We then use these required surface polarizations to obtain the effective polarizabilities for the synthesis of the metasurface. We demonstrate the use of this general method for the synthesis of metasurfaces that lead to scattering cancellation and illusion effects, and discuss practical scenarios by using loaded dipole antennas to realize the discretized polarization current densities. This study is the first fundamental step that may lead to interesting electromagnetic applications, like stealth technology, antenna synthesis, wireless power transfer, sensors, cylindrical absorbers, etc. I. INTRODUCTION formal metaurfaces with large radial curvatures (at the wavelength scale) [41]. However, that method was based on the analysis of planar structures with open bound- Metasurfaces are surface equivalents of bulk meta- aries while a cylindrical metasurface can be generally materials, usually realized as dense planar arrays of closed in its azimuthal plane and it involves rather differ- subwavelength-sized resonant particles [1{4].
    [Show full text]
  • Dielectric Cylinder That Rotates in a Uniform Magnetic Field Kirk T
    Dielectric Cylinder That Rotates in a Uniform Magnetic Field Kirk T. McDonald Joseph Henry Laboratories, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 (Mar. 12, 2003) 1Problem A cylinder of relative dielectric constant εr rotates with constant angular velocity ω about its axis. A uniform magnetic field B is parallel to the axis, in the same sense as ω.Find the resulting dielectric polarization P in the cylinder and the surface and volume charge densities σ and ρ, neglecting terms of order (ωa/c)2,wherea is the radius of the cylinder. This problem can be conveniently analyzed by starting in the rotating frame, in which P = P and E = E+v×B,when(v/c)2 corrections are neglected. Consider also the electric displacement D. 2Solution The v × B force on an atom in the rotating cylinder is radially outwards, and increas- ing linearly with radius, so we expect a positive radial polarization P = Pˆr in cylindrical coordinates. There will be an electric field E inside the dielectric associated with this polarization. We now have a “chicken-and-egg” problem: the magnetic field induces some polarization in the rotating cylinder, which induces some electric field, which induces some more polarization, etc. One way to proceed is to follow this line of thought to develop an iterative solution for the polarization. This is done somewhat later in the solution. Or, we can avoid the iterative approach by going to the rotating frame, where there is no interaction between the medium and the magnetic field, but where there is an effective electric field E.
    [Show full text]
  • Physics 115 Lightning Gauss's Law Electrical Potential Energy Electric
    Physics 115 General Physics II Session 18 Lightning Gauss’s Law Electrical potential energy Electric potential V • R. J. Wilkes • Email: [email protected] • Home page: http://courses.washington.edu/phy115a/ 5/1/14 1 Lecture Schedule (up to exam 2) Today 5/1/14 Physics 115 2 Example: Electron Moving in a Perpendicular Electric Field ...similar to prob. 19-101 in textbook 6 • Electron has v0 = 1.00x10 m/s i • Enters uniform electric field E = 2000 N/C (down) (a) Compare the electric and gravitational forces on the electron. (b) By how much is the electron deflected after travelling 1.0 cm in the x direction? y x F eE e = 1 2 Δy = ayt , ay = Fnet / m = (eE ↑+mg ↓) / m ≈ eE / m Fg mg 2 −19 ! $2 (1.60×10 C)(2000 N/C) 1 ! eE $ 2 Δx eE Δx = −31 Δy = # &t , v >> v → t ≈ → Δy = # & (9.11×10 kg)(9.8 N/kg) x y 2" m % vx 2m" vx % 13 = 3.6×10 2 (1.60×10−19 C)(2000 N/C)! (0.01 m) $ = −31 # 6 & (Math typos corrected) 2(9.11×10 kg) "(1.0×10 m/s)% 5/1/14 Physics 115 = 0.018 m =1.8 cm (upward) 3 Big Static Charges: About Lightning • Lightning = huge electric discharge • Clouds get charged through friction – Clouds rub against mountains – Raindrops/ice particles carry charge • Discharge may carry 100,000 amperes – What’s an ampere ? Definition soon… • 1 kilometer long arc means 3 billion volts! – What’s a volt ? Definition soon… – High voltage breaks down air’s resistance – What’s resistance? Definition soon..
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Dispersion Consideration in Dipoles
    Basics of averaging of the Maxwell equations A. Chipouline, C. Simovski, S. Tretyakov Abstract Volume or statistical averaging of the microscopic Maxwell equations (MEs), i.e. transition from microscopic MEs to their macroscopic counterparts, is one of the main steps in electrodynamics of materials. In spite of the fundamental importance of the averaging procedure, it is quite rarely properly discussed in university courses and respective books; up to now there is no established consensus about how the averaging procedure has to be performed. In this paper we show that there are some basic principles for the averaging procedure (irrespective to what type of material is studied) which have to be satisfied. Any homogenization model has to be consistent with the basic principles. In case of absence of this correlation of a particular model with the basic principles the model could not be accepted as a credible one. Another goal of this paper is to establish the averaging procedure for metamaterials, which is rather close to the case of compound materials but should include magnetic response of the inclusions and their clusters. We start from the consideration of bulk materials, which means in the vast majority of cases that we consider propagation of an electromagnetic wave far from the interfaces, where the eigenwave in the medium has been already formed and stabilized. A basic structure for discussion about boundary conditions and layered metamaterials is a subject of separate publication and will be done elsewhere. 1. Material equations
    [Show full text]