Oral Antibiotic Exposure and Kidney Stone Disease
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY www.jasn.org Oral Antibiotic Exposure and Kidney Stone Disease Gregory E. Tasian,1,2,3 Thomas Jemielita,4 David S. Goldfarb,5 Lawrence Copelovitch,6 Jeffrey S. Gerber,2,3,7 Qufei Wu,3 and Michelle R. Denburg2,3,6 1Division of Pediatric Urology, Department of Surgery, and 2Center for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; 3Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; 4Biostatistics and Research Decision Science, Early Oncology Department, Merck & Co., Inc., North Wales, Pennsylvania; 5Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York; and Divisions of 6Nephrology and 7Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania ABSTRACT Background Although intestinal and urinary microbiome perturbations are associated with nephrolithia- sis, whether antibiotics are a risk factor for this condition remains unknown. Methods We determined the association between 12 classes of oral antibiotics and nephrolithiasis in a population-based, case–control study nested within 641 general practices providing electronic health record data for .13 million children and adults from 1994 to 2015 in the United Kingdom. We used in- cidence density sampling to match 25,981 patients with nephrolithiasis to 259,797 controls by age, sex, and practice at date of diagnosis (index date). Conditional logistic regression models were adjusted for the rate of health care encounters, comorbidities, urinary tract infections, and use of thiazide and loop di- uretics, proton-pump inhibitors, and statins. Results Exposure to any of five different antibiotic classes 3–12 months before index date was associated with nephrolithiasis. The adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) was 2.33 (2.19 to 2.48) for sulfas, 1.88 (1.75 to 2.01) for cephalosporins, 1.67 (1.54 to 1.81) for fluoroquinolones, 1.70 (1.55 to 1.88) for nitrofurantoin/methenamine, and 1.27 (1.18 to 1.36) for broad-spectrum penicillins. In exploratory analy- ses, the magnitude of associations was greatest for exposure at younger ages (P,0.001) and 3–6months before index date (P,0.001), with all but broad-spectrum penicillins remaining statistically significant 3–5 years from exposure. CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY Conclusions Oral antibiotics associated with increased odds of nephrolithiasis, with the greatest odds for recent exposure and exposure at younger age. These results have implications for disease pathogenesis and the rising incidence of nephrolithiasis, particularly among children. J Am Soc Nephrol 29: 1731–1740, 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2017111213 Prior studies have reported associations between extracted from patients without urinary tract infec- antibiotic exposure and diseases such as inflamma- tion (UTI), suggesting a role for selective pressure tory bowel disease and asthma.1,2 These associa- on the urinary microbiome in kidney stone tions are thought to be mediated by disruption of the human microbiome. Received November 22, 2017. Accepted March 25, 2018. It is biologically plausible that antibiotics may Published online ahead of print. Publication date available at increase the risk of nephrolithiasis. Recent studies www.jasn.org. reported differences in the composition of the in- Correspondence: Dr. Gregory Edward Tasian, Division of Urol- testinal microbiome between patients with and ogy, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Wood Center, 3rd Floor, without nephrolithiasis.3,4 Additionally, multidrug 34th Street and Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104. resistant nonurease-producing bacteria have been Email: [email protected] isolated from calcium-based kidney stones Copyright © 2018 by the American Society of Nephrology J Am Soc Nephrol 29: 1731–1740, 2018 ISSN : 1046-6673/2906-1731 1731 CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY www.jasn.org formation.5 However, despite the well established effect that Significance Statement antibiotics have on the microbiome, it remains unclear whether antibiotics are a risk factor for nephrolithiasis. This Kidney stones are a disorder of crystallization related to the su- information would have important implications for elucidat- persaturation of solutes in urine. For reasons that remain ill-defined, ing causal pathways for kidney stone formation, understand- the prevalence has increased 70% over the past 30 years. Pertur- bations in the intestinal and urinary microbiome are associated with ing the increase in the prevalence of nephrolithiasis (most nephrolithiasis, but it is uncertain whether antibiotics are a risk factor pronounced among children, adolescents, and young for nephrolithiasis. This article reports that oral cephalosporins, adults),6,7 and promoting antibiotic stewardship. fluoroquinolones, sulfas, nitrofurantoin, and broad-spectrum peni- In this nested case–control study, we evaluated the associ- cillins are associated with increased adjusted odds of nephrolithiasis ation between oral antibiotic exposure and nephrolithiasis, among children and adults. The greatest risk was estimated for prescriptions at younger ages and for more recent exposures. Ex- and assessed its strength and temporality by antibiotic class. posure to some oral antibiotics may represent a novel risk factor for Because prior murine studies demonstrated a greater effect of nephrolithiasis and might contribute to the rising incidence of kidney early-life antibiotic exposure on host metabolism,8 we hy- stones, particularly among children. pothesized that exposure to oral antibiotics at younger ages would be associated with a greater risk of nephrolithiasis. associations between nephrolithiasis and hypertension and CKD12 similar to those reported in prospective cohort METHODS studies that ascertained nephrolithiasis through validated self-report.13,14 Patients ,90 years old without Read codes for nephroli- Study Design thiasis, bladder calculi, renal colic, hypercalciuria, or nephro- We conducted a population-based, nested case–control study, calcinosis before the index date were eligible for selection using the February 2015 version of The Health Improvement as controls. Ten controls were matched on age, sex, and GP Network (THIN). THIN comprises data from 13.8 million practice to each case at their index date by incidence density individuals receiving care in 641 general practitioner (GP) sampling. practices in the United Kingdom from 1994 to 2015. These patients are representative of the United Kingdom population by age, sex, medical conditions, and death rates. Practices Exposure enter clinical data for each patient encounter, generating a The primary exposure was an outpatient oral antibiotic pre- – longitudinal, patient-level record that includes outpatient pre- scribed 3 12 months before the index date. This period was scriptions. Diagnoses and procedures are recorded with Read selected because kidney stones form over weeks to months and codes, the standard classification system in the United King- oral antibiotics cause changes in the quantity and composition 15 dom. THIN facilitates population-based pharmacoepidemio- of the microbiome for months after exposure. Patients who logic studies because approximately 98% of the United had antibiotic prescriptions within 3 months of the index date Kingdom population is registered with a GP practice,9 and were not considered exposed to mitigate exposure misclassi- fi GPs have nearly exclusive prescribing rights within the Na- cation (e.g., antibiotics recorded before the nephrolithiasis tional Health Service. This study was determined by the Uni- diagnosis were actually prescribed afterward) and because an- versity of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board to meet tibiotics may have been prescribed for symptoms related to criteria for institutional review board exemption. stone presentations (e.g., dysuria or pyuria on urinalysis). Antibiotics were categorized as cephalosporins, fluoroqui- Study Population and Outcome nolones, lincosamides, macrolides, metronidazole, nitrofur- The outcome was nephrolithiasis diagnosis. Tobe considered a antoin/methenamine, penicillins, broad-spectrum penicillins, case, an individual had to be ,90 years old and registered with sulfas, tetracyclines, and antimycobacterial drugs (see Supple- his/her GP practice for 6 months before the first qualifying mental Table 2 for drugs in each antibiotic class). We also code for nephrolithiasis. Although this approach has been val- examined Helicobacter pylori treatment, because it is explicitly fi idated for ascertainment of incident diagnoses in THIN, it has identi ed in THIN and prior studies reported decreased in- not been validated for nephrolithiasis, which can be charac- testinal colonization by Oxalobacter 6 months after H. pylori 16 terized by recurrent acute episodes.10 Patients who only had treatment. Prescriptions for each antibiotic of any duration codes for renal colic, hypercalciuria, or nephrocalcinosis and dosage within the exposure window was evaluated as a were not considered to have nephrolithiasis. The date of neph- binary variable. rolithiasis diagnosis (index date) was the date that the first qualifying code for nephrolithiasis was recorded (see Supple- Covariates mental Table 1 for nephrolithiasis codes).11,12 Patients with For each individual, we identified prevalent