DOCSLIB.ORG

Georges River and Woronora River Valley Flood Emergency Sub Plan Volume 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Georges River and Woronora River Valley Flood Emergency Sub Plan Volume 1 May 2018 To be reviewed no later than May 2023 GEORGES RIVER AND WORONORA RIVER VALLEY FLOOD EMERGENCY SUB PLAN A Sub Plan of the Sydney Metropolitan and South West Metropolitan Regional Emergency Management Plans (EMPLAN) AUTHORISATION This River Basin Flood Emergency Sub Plan is a sub plan of the Regional Emergency Management Plan (EMPLAN). It has been prepared in accordance with the provisions of the State Emergency Service Act 1989 (NSW) and is authorised by the Region Emergency Management Committee in accordance with the provisions of the State Emergency and Rescue Management Act 1989 (NSW). Recommended Approved Approved VERSION HISTORY The following table lists all previously endorsed versions of this plan. Plan Endorsed Bankstown City Flood Emergency Sub Plan November 2015 Campbelltown Flood Emergency Sub Plan June 2015 Fairfield City Local Flood Plan April 2016 Liverpool City Flood Emergency Sub Plan November 2015 Sutherland Shire Flood Emergency Sub Plan September 2013 AMENDMENT LIST Proposals for amendment to this plan are to be forwarded to: Sydney Southern Region Controller NSW State Emergency Service PO Box M54 Manahan NSW 2200 Amendments promulgated are to be certified below when entered. Amendment Description Updated by Date Number May 2018 Georges River and Woronora River Valley Flood Emergency Sub Plan Page | ii COPYRIGHT This plan is under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licensing conditions (Creative Commons Australia - About Licences) the Creative Commons licensing system, unless otherwise indicated. Copyright for this plan resides with the State of New South Wales, NSW State Emergency Service unless otherwise indicated. DISTRIBUTION LIST This sub plan is distributed and maintained through the Region Emergency Management Committee and NSW State Emergency Service and FloodSafe Websites in electronic format. May 2018 Georges River and Woronora River Valley Flood Emergency Sub Plan Page | iii CONTENTS PART 1 - INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 PURPOSE ................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Authority ................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.3 Area Covered by the Plan ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.4 Out of Scope .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.5 Floods and Their Potential Impacts ....................................................................................................... 1 1.6 Relationships between Plans ................................................................................................................. 2 1.7 Maintenance of this Plan ....................................................................................................................... 2 PART 2 - RESPONSIBILITIES .............................................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 NSW SES Sydney Southern Region ........................................................................................................ 3 2.3 NSW SES Incident Controller ................................................................................................................. 4 2.4 NSW SES local/Unit controllers.............................................................................................................. 6 2.5 NSW SES Units ....................................................................................................................................... 7 2.6 South West Metropolitan and Sydney Metropolitan Region Emergency Operations Controller (REOCON) ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 2.7 Local Emergency Operations Controller (LEOCON)/s for the respective area of operations ................ 8 2.8 Councils listed in section 1.3 .................................................................................................................. 9 2.9 Community Members within THE Georges River Valley ...................................................................... 10 2.10 Agriculture and Animal Services Functional Area ................................................................................ 11 2.11 Australian Government Bureau of Meteorology (The Bureau) ........................................................... 11 2.12 Caravan Park Proprietor(s) .................................................................................................................. 12 2.13 Child Care Centres and Preschools ...................................................................................................... 13 2.14 Energy and Utility Services Functional Area ........................................................................................ 13 2.15 Local utility service distribution providers (electricity, gas, water, waste water) ............................... 14 2.16 Engineering Services Functional Area .................................................................................................. 14 2.17 Environmental Services Functional Area ............................................................................................. 15 2.18 Fire and Rescue NSW ........................................................................................................................... 15 2.19 Health Services Functional Area .......................................................................................................... 16 2.20 Marine Rescue NSW ............................................................................................................................ 16 2.21 NSW Ambulance .................................................................................................................................. 17 2.22 NSW Association of independent Schools, NSW Department of Education & Communities and Catholic Schools Diocese .................................................................................................................................. 17 2.23 NSW Office of Environment and Heritage ........................................................................................... 18 2.24 NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service ............................................................................................ 18 2.25 Water NSw ........................................................................................................................................... 19 2.26 NSW Police Force ................................................................................................................................. 19 2.27 NSW Rural Fire Service ........................................................................................................................ 20 2.28 NSW Transport Management Centre .................................................................................................. 20 2.29 NSW TrainS/ Sydney Trains.................................................................................................................. 21 2.30 NSW Volunteer Rescue Association..................................................................................................... 21 2.31 Owners of Prescribed Dams in Georges River ..................................................................................... 21 2.32 Public Information Services Functional Area ....................................................................................... 22 2.33 NSW Roads and Maritime Services ...................................................................................................... 22 2.34 Service and Sporting Clubs .................................................................................................................. 23 2.35 Surf Life Saving NSW ............................................................................................................................ 23 May 2018 Georges River and Woronora River Valley Flood Emergency Sub Plan Page | iv 2.36 Telecommunication Services Functional Area ..................................................................................... 23 2.37 Transport Services Functional Area ..................................................................................................... 24 2.38 Welfare Services Functional Area ........................................................................................................ 24 PART 3 - MITIGATING FLOODING AND MANAGING FLOODPLAINS ................................................................ 25 3.1 General ................................................................................................................................................ 25 3.2 Managing Floodplains .......................................................................................................................... 25 PART 4 - PREPARING FOR FLOODS ................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dragonfly Survey Report
    Moorebank Precinct West Threatened Dragonfly Species Survey Plan Report Part 4, Division 4.1, State Significant Development September 2016 TACTICAL GROUP MOOREBANK PRECINCT WEST Threatened Dragonfly Species Survey Plan Report Author Adam Costenoble Checker Kate Carroll Approver Ketan Patel Report No 001 Date 26/09/2016 Revision Text Final This report has been prepared for Tactical Group in accordance with the terms and conditions of appointment for AA009335 dated July 2016. Arcadis Australia Pacific Pty Limited (ABN 76 104 485 289) cannot accept any responsibility for any use of or reliance on the contents of this report by any third party. REVISIONS Prepared Approved Revision Date Description by by Adam 001 26/09/16 For submission to DPI Fisheries Ketan Patel Costenoble V i CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 1 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Project Overview ................................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Purpose of this report ......................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Aims of this Report ............................................................................................................. 3 1.4 Consultation .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sewage Treatment System Impact Monitoring Program
    Sewage Treatment System Impact Monitoring Program Volume 1 Data Report 2019-20 Commercial-in-Confidence Sydney Water 1 Smith Street, Parramatta, NSW Australia 2150 PO Box 399 Parramatta NSW 2124 Report version: STSIMP Data Report 2019-20 Volume 1 final © Sydney Water 2020 This work is copyright. It may be reproduced for study, research or training purposes subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgement of the source and no commercial usage or sale. Reproduction for purposes other than those listed requires permission from Sydney Water. Sewage Treatment System Impact Monitoring Program | Vol 1 Data Report 2019-20 Page | i Executive summary Background Sydney Water operates 23 wastewater treatment systems and each system has an Environment Protection Licence (EPL) regulated by the NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA). Each EPL specifies the minimum performance standards and monitoring that is required. The Sewage Treatment System Impact Monitoring Program (STSIMP) commenced in 2008 to satisfy condition M5.1a of our EPLs. The results are reported to the NSW EPA every year. The STSIMP aims to monitor the environment within Sydney Water’s area of operations to determine general trends in water quality over time, monitor Sydney Water’s performance and to determine where Sydney Water’s contribution to water quality may pose a risk to environmental ecosystems and human health. The format and content of 2019-20 Data Report predominantly follows four earlier reports (2015-16 to 2018-19). Sydney Water’s overall approach to monitoring (design and method) is consistent with the Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council (ANZECC 2000 and ANZG 2018) guidelines.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Paper (Pdf)
    Department of Agriculture, Fisheries & Forestry ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF SPREAD FOR STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT OF THE CORE ALLIGATOR WEED INFESTATIONS IN AUSTRALIA - TAKING STOCK FINAL REPORT October 2008 Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Assessment of Risk of Spread for Strategic Management of the Core Alligator Weed Infestations in Australia- ‘Taking Stock’ CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL FOR ISSUE OF DOCUMENTS Report Title: Final Report Document Status: Final Report Document No: NE210541-2008 Date of Issue: 10/10/2008 Assessment of Risk of Spread for Strategic Management Client: Department of Agriculture, Project Title: of the Core Alligator Weed Infestations in Australia - Fisheries & Forestry Taking Stock Comments: Position Name Signature Date Prepared by: Principal Consultant Dr. Nimal Chandrasena 10 October 2008 DAFF, CMAs, DPI, Peer Review by: LGAs and various Given in acknowledgements July-August 2008 others For further information on this report, contact: Name: Dr. Nimal Chandrasena Title: Principal Ecologist, Ecowise Environmental Address: 24 Lemko Place, Penrith, NSW 2750 Phone: 4721 3477 Mobile: 0408 279 604 E-mail: [email protected] Document Revision Control Version Description of Revision Person Making Issue Date Approval 1 Working Draft Dr. Nimal Chandrasena 27 July 2008 2 Final Draft Dr. Nimal Chandrasena 10 October 2008 © Ecowise Environmental Pty Ltd This Report and the information, ideas, concepts, methodologies, technologies and other material remain the intellectual property of Ecowise Environmental Pty Ltd. Disclaimer This document has been prepared for the Client named above and is to be used only for the purposes for which it was commissioned. No warranty is given as to its suitability for any other purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Gazette No 164 of Friday 23 April 2021
    GOVERNMENT GAZETTE – 4 September 2020 Government Gazette of the State of New South Wales Number 164–Electricity and Water Friday, 23 April 2021 The New South Wales Government Gazette is the permanent public record of official NSW Government notices. It also contains local council, non-government and other notices. Each notice in the Government Gazette has a unique reference number that appears in parentheses at the end of the notice and can be used as a reference for that notice (for example, (n2019-14)). The Gazette is compiled by the Parliamentary Counsel’s Office and published on the NSW legislation website (www.legislation.nsw.gov.au) under the authority of the NSW Government. The website contains a permanent archive of past Gazettes. To submit a notice for gazettal, see the Gazette page. By Authority ISSN 2201-7534 Government Printer NSW Government Gazette No 164 of 23 April 2021 DATA LOGGING AND TELEMETRY SPECIFICATIONS 2021 under the WATER MANAGEMENT (GENERAL) REGULATION 2018 I, Kaia Hodge, by delegation from the Minister administering the Water Management Act 2000, pursuant to clause 10 of Schedule 8 to the Water Management (General) Regulation 2018 (the Regulation) approve the following data logging and telemetry specifications for metering equipment. Dated this 15 day of April 2021. KAIA HODGE Executive Director, Regional Water Strategies Department of Planning, Industry and Environment By delegation Explanatory note This instrument is made under clause 10 (1) of Schedule 8 to the Regulation. The object of this instrument is to approve data logging and telemetry specifications for metering equipment that holders of water supply work approvals, water access licences and Water Act 1912 licences and entitlements that are subject to the mandatory metering equipment condition must comply with.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Vegetation of the Woronora, O'hares and Metroplitan Catchments
    The Native Vegetation of the Woronora, O’Hares and Metropolitan Catchments Central Conservation Programs and Planning Division NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service August 2003 Native Vegetation of the Woronora, O’Hares and Metropolitan Catchments September 2003 Published by: is not guaranteed to be free from error or omission. NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service NPWS and its employees disclaim liability for any 59-61 Goulburn Street, Sydney, NSW 2000 act done on the information in the map and any PO Box A290, Sydney South, NSW 1232 consequences of such acts or omissions. Report pollution and environmental This report should be referenced as follows: incidents Environment Line: 131 555 (NSW only) or NPWS (2003) The Native Vegetation of the [email protected] Woronora, O’Hares and Metropolitan Catchments. See also NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service, Sydney. www.environment.nsw.gov.au/pollution Phone: (02) 9995 5000 (switchboard) Phone: 131 555 (environment information and publications requests) Phone: 1300 361 967 (national parks, climate change and energy efficiency information and publications requests) Fax: (02) 9995 5999 TTY: (02) 9211 4723 Email: [email protected] Website: www.environment.nsw.gov.au ISBN 0731367936 NPWS Publishing No. 2003/0143 September 2003 © Copyright National Parks and Wildlife Service on behalf of State of NSW. Photographs are copyright National Parks and Wildlife Service or the individual photographer. With the exception of photographs, the National Parks and Wildlife Service and State of NSW are pleased to allow this material to be reproduced in whole or in part for educational and non-commercial use, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of the 210 Pb-Dating Technique to Establish A
    AU9816897 Application of the 210Pb-dating technique to establish a chronological framework of trace element and heavy metal contamination resulting from the impact of European settlement in estuarine systems of the Sydney Basin, Australia. Jenkinson, A.V., Chisari, R., Farrar, Y.J., Heijnis, H., & McOrist, G.D. Environmental Radiochemistry Group, Environment Division, Australian Nuclear Science & Technology Organisation, PMB 1 Menai, NSW 2234, Australia. Tinker, R.A. & Smith, J.D. Marine Chemistry Laboratory, School of Chemistry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia. Napoli, M. & Hughes, M. Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. James, J.M. School of Chemistry, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. The estuaries of Georges River and Hacking River (Figure 1), partly located in suburban Sydney, are at significant risk of contamination by heavy metal and trace element pollutants associated with urban/industrial development. The object of the current work is to correlate changes in land use resulting from European settlement with chemical changes observed in soil sediments. The region was first explored by Bass and Flinders in 1795 with the first land grant being issued in 1798. Initial settlement of the area was restricted because of its isolation from both Sydney and Parramatta, a situation which only changed with the building of a viable road system (circa. 1814). By 1900 Georges River was experiencing siltation and the water quality adversely affected by local industry, particularly wool-washing facilities. At the time the area around Saltpan Creek was being promoted as a site for 'noxious trades'. Rapid subdivision of land began soon after the turn of the century with major subdivisions occurring in the 1910s and 1920s.
    [Show full text]
  • Concrete 2007
    State of Australian Cities Conference 2013 Changing Water Values in Urban Waterway Naturalisation: findings from a Sydney case study 1Jacqueline Soars 2 Fiona Miller 1 Macquarie University 2 Department of Environment and Geography, Macquarie University Abstract: The naturalisation of altered creeks, and the reconfiguration of their surrounds, is an emerging issue in Sydney’s water management. This is evidenced by the rising number of plans for naturalisation initiatives. With particular reference to Johnstons Creek Stormwater Channel in inner-western Sydney, this paper examines community and managing bodies’ changing perception and values of urban waterways. In addition, it explores the way in which these perceptions and values intertwine with the politics of urban water management and influence the outcomes of the naturalisation process. This research, undertaken using community surveys, observations and key informant interviews, indicates that there is an emerging preference for the naturalisation of altered waterways by the surrounding community. However conflict between human centred and decentred values is also evident. Ecological objectives remain secondary to the dominant political boundaries put in place. Therefore attempting to reinstate natural elements to the urban landscape is still strongly defined by human centred values and objectives, reflecting a continuation of conflict in society-nature relations. These findings add to the increasing body of literature on water sensitive urban design (WSUD) as well as providing insight into the liveability of cities. 1 Introduction Urban water management practices in Australia have largely come to treat water as a commodity and waterways as a tool for altering flows to provide particular services. Historically, natural waterways within urban areas have been altered and reconfigured to meet the needs of urban residents.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Greater Sydney Region Plan
    OUR GREATER SYDNEY 2056 A metropolis of three cities – connecting people DRAFT Greater Sydney Region Plan October 2017 How to be involved The draftGreater Sydney Region Plan sets out a vision, Before making a submission, please read the Privacy objectives, strategies and actions for a metropolis of three Statement at www.greater.sydney/privacy. If you provide cities across Greater Sydney. It is on formal public exhibition a submission in relation to this document using any of the until 15 December 2017. above addresses, you will be taken to have accepted the Privacy Statement. You can read the entire draft Plan atwww.greater.sydney Please note that all submissions and comments will be You can make a submission: treated as public and will be published in a variety of by visiting www.greater.sydney/submissions mediums. If you would like to make a submission without by emailing [email protected] it being made public or if you have any questions about the application of the Commission’s privacy policy, please by post to: contact the Commission directly on 1800 617 681 or Greater Sydney Commission [email protected] Draft Greater Sydney Region Plan PO BOX 257 Parramatta NSW 2124 Greater Sydney Commission | Draft Greater Sydney Region Plan 2017 3 A metropolis of three cities will transform land use and transport patterns and boost Greater Sydney’s liveability, productivity and sustainability by spreading the benefits of growth to all its residents. Chief Commissioner Lucy Hughes Turnbull AO I am delighted to present the Greater take the pressure off housing affordability Sydney Commission’s first draft regional and maintain and enhance our plan to the people of Greater Sydney and natural resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 Ecosystem Health
    Chapter 5 Ecosystem Health Key Points Indicator Status of Indicator 5.1 Ecosystem water quality Since the 2003 Audit period, the number of locations exceeding ANZECC water quality guidelines has increased for physical parameters such as conductivity, remained high for nutrient parameters and reduced for toxicants. 5.2 Macroinvertebrates There are less sampled locations with similar to reference ratings compared with the 2003 Audit period. Macroinvertebrate assemblages at 32% of the sampled locations in the Catchment were found to be significantly impaired and 5% of all sampled locations had a severely impaired rating. 5.3 Fish Monitoring of fish communities in the Catchment is still needed as a potentially useful indicator of ecosystem health. 5.4 Riparian vegetation Riparian zones outside the Special Areas are likely to be under variable pressure due to little to no standing vegetation cover, stock access, and the presence of exotic species. Change in condition of vegetation in the riparian zone is not able to be determined. 5.5 Native vegetation Native vegetation covers approximately 50% of the Catchment. Approved land clearance substantially decreased over the 2005 Audit period. Healthy and intact natural ecosystems play a crucial role in maintaining water quality as they provide processes that help purify water, and mitigate the effects of drought and flood. An overall picture of the ecological health of a catchment can be achieved using tools such as water quality, habitat descriptions, biological monitoring and flow characteristics (Qld DNRM 2001). Ecosystem health assessment has become more ecologically based in recent years with biological measures such as ecosystem structure and species diversity having been added to traditional physico-chemical water quality analysis to provide a more comprehensive picture of the condition or catchment health (Qld DNRM 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • OUR GREATER SYDNEY 2056 Western City District Plan – Connecting Communities
    OUR GREATER SYDNEY 2056 Western City District Plan – connecting communities March 2018 Updated 2 Acknowledgement of Country Western City District The Greater Sydney Commission Blue Mountains acknowledges the traditional owners Camden Campbelltown of the lands that include Western City Fairfield District and the living culture of the Hawkesbury Liverpool traditional custodians of these lands. Penrith The Commission recognises that the Wollondilly traditional owners have occupied and cared for this Country over countless generations, and celebrates their continuing contribution to the life of Greater Sydney. Greater Sydney Commission | Draft Western City District Plan 3 Foreward Chief Commissioner I am delighted to present the Western Collaboration is the key to transparent Lucy Hughes Turnbull AO City District Plan, which sets out planning and informed decision-making on our priorities and actions for improving the city’s future growth. The Greater Sydney quality of life for residents as the district Commission will continue to bring grows and changes. together all parties with an interest in the The Plan recognises what the Greater District’s future and channel the collective Sydney Commission has heard – energy into improved planning outcomes. particularly that the District’s natural By taking a leadership role, we are bringing landscape is a great asset and attractor, together public resources and expertise sustaining and supporting a unique, to create a more liveable, productive and parkland city. sustainable city. This Plan complements those natural Finally, on behalf of the Greater Sydney assets, and it puts people first. It Commission, I acknowledge the important leverages the transformative, economic work of councils whose submissions improvements from the Western Sydney and feedback on the needs of their Airport and considers the transport, neighbourhoods and centres have been infrastructure, services, affordable invaluable.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Mountains Dams Booklet
    BLUE MOUNTAINS SYSTEM MOUNTAINS BLUE DAMS OF GREATER SYDNEY AND SURROUNDS Blue Mountains 1 Sydney’s drinking water is collected from five catchment areas, occupying 16,000 square kilometres. Water is stored in 21 dams, holding over 2.5 million megalitres of water. The Blue Mountains System comprises three small catchment areas feeding six dams, which provide water for about 41,000 people living in the Blue Mountains region. < BLUE MOUNTAINS CATCHMENT AREA Introducing WaterNSW WaterNSW is Australia’s largest water supplier. We provide two-thirds of the water used in NSW and develop infrastructure solutions for water supply security and reliability. We operate and maintain 42 large dams and we deliver water for agriculture and drinking water supply customers. WaterNSW also protects the health of Sydney’s drinking water catchment to ensure highest quality drinking water is consistently available. 1 Blue Mountains Catchments Greaves Creek Dam Woodford Sydney’s Medlow Dam Dam Cascade Dams drinking water Lithgow C o er x iv s R R y i r v u e b r s e k w a H Katoomba Prospect catchments Reservoir Warragamba Dam Pipelines Prospect Water Filtration Plant Sydney er iv anal Nepean R Lake ver wmung R Ri Burragorang Upper C a Ko or n o iv r er o W Woronora Dam Broughtons Pass Weir Pheasants Nest Weir Na ttai R Nepean Dam Cataract Wing iv e er Dam c a r r Avon Wollongong ib e Cordeaux e R Dam Crookwell iver Bowral Dam Wingecarribee Reservoir er Riv Fitzroy Falls illy nd lo Reservoir ol Bendeela Pondage Goulburn W Lake Yarrunga Tallowa Nowra Dam er iv R Canberra n e v a lh a o h S Braidwood Sydney’s drinking water catchments Pumping station Canals and pipelines Dam Cooma 2 The catchments A catchment is an area where water is WaterNSW helps protect five catchment areas, collected by the natural landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • INTEGRATED MONITORING PROGRAM for the Hawkesbury-Nepean, Shoalhaven and Woronora River Systems
    HAWKESBURY NEPEAN RIVER MANAGEMENT FORUM INTEGRATED MONITORING PROGRAM for the Hawkesbury-Nepean, Shoalhaven and Woronora River Systems PREPARED BY Independent Expert Panel on Environmental Flows for the Hawkesbury Nepean, Shoalhaven and Woronora Catchments April 2004 Independent Expert Panel Members Mr Robert Wilson BA (Hons), FCPA, MACS; Independent Chair Dr David Barnes, Sinclair Knight Merz Pty. Ltd.; Bulk water and sewerage systems Dr.Keith Bishop, Freshwater Biology Consultant; Fish ecology Dr Tony Church, Sinclair Knight Merz Pty. Ltd.; Water quality Dr Ivor Growns, Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources; Macroinvertebrate ecology Dr Eleni Taylor-Wood, Biosis Research Pty. Ltd.; In-stream and riparian vegetation Mr Ian Varley, SMEC Australia; Hydrology Dr Robin Warner, Environmental Geomorphologist; Geomorphology Dr Stuart White, Institute for Sustainable Futures; Resource economics and socio-economic assessment The Expert Panel acknowledges the support and expertise provided by associated advisers. Illustrations Conceptual model diagrams; Ros Dare, Sinclair Knight Merz Pty. Ltd Ecological processes (Plates 1 to 7); Robbie Charles Bishop-Taylor EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The New South Wales (NSW) Government established the Hawkesbury-Nepean Management Forum (Forum) to make recommendations on an environmental flow regime for the Hawkesbury-Nepean River that would incorporate the maintenance of or improvement in environmental, social and economic conditions. The establishment of the Forum arose out of the Council of Australian Governments’ Water Reform Framework of 1994 and the NSW Government’s Water Reforms of 1997. To assist the NSW government and the Forum, the NSW government appointed the Independent Expert Panel on Environmental Flows for the Hawkesbury-Nepean, Shoalhaven and Woronora Rivers (Panel). To guide the Forum’s work plan and the work of the Panel, environmental, socio-economic, and cultural objectives were established.
    [Show full text]