DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Contents Agenda ...2 Demos

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table of Contents Agenda ...2 Demos Table of Contents Agenda . 2 Demos . 6 Keynote. 7 Papers . 8 Butts . 8 Chopra and Wallace . 9 Diesner and Lewis . 11 Tsvetovat, Carley & Sycara . 14 Okada and Ohta . 16 Cronin . 19 Clegg, Lambert and Buettner . 20 Reynolds and Saleem . .. .23 Klüver . 35 Patty . 37 Takadama, Tsujinaka, and Shimohara . 38 Burton, Obel and Roach . 41 Deguchi . 42 Sierhaus . 45 Jensen . 52 Arora, Choudhary, Kannan, Krishnan, Padman . 54 Adams . 55 Jaffe . 57 Yuan . .. 58 Panzarasa, Carley and Krackhardt . 59 Krackhardt and Feld . 62 van Alstyne . ..63 Cross . 64 Cataldo . .67 Carley and Ren . .69 Gonzalez . .71 Gibson . 74 Samuelson . .75 Takahashi . 76 Ren, Carley and Argote . 78 Lambert, Kunz, and Levitt . .. .79 Stoica . 83 Vermeulen and Bruggeman . .85 Chen and Carley . 86 Lee . 88 Bellamine-Ben Saoud and Mark . 90 Kurahashi and Terano . .94 Matsui, Ono, Sato, Deguchi, Terano, Kita and Shiozawa . 97 Contact Information . 100 1 CASOS 2001 Welcome to CASOS 2001, an International Conference on Computational Social and Organizational Systems. We are pleased to welcome you to Carnegie Mellon University and Pittsburgh, PA USA. Agenda All talks and breaks will be held in Roberts Hall on CMU’s campus. The reception and keynote dinner will be in the University Center. CASOS 2001 – Conference Thursday July 5, 2001 Time Location Speaker Title 12:00-1:00 pm Seagate Atrium Registration for Conference 1:00-1:10 pm Singleton Carley & Prietula Introduction and Welcome Session 1 1:10-1:40 pm Singleton Carter Butts Interregional Relations from Spatially-Embedded Interpersonal Networks 1:40-2:10 pm Singleton Kari Chopra & William Experimental Evaluation of a Computational Approach to Wallace Consensus Knowledge 2:10-2:40 pm Singleton Jana Diesner & Eleanor The Implications of Coding Techniques for Interpreting T. Lewis Text Analysis Results 2:40-3:10 pm Seagate Atrium Break Session 2 3.10-3:40 pm Singleton Max Tsvetovat. Specialists, Generalists and Market Segmentation: A Kathleen Carley and Multi-Agent Model Katyia Sycara 3:40-4:10 pm Singleton Isamu Okada and Advantage of Human Behavioral Model using Multiagent Toshizumi Ohta Simulation 4:10-4:40 pm Singleton Matthew Cronin A Model of Help Exchange in Business Relationships 4:40-5:10 pm Singleton Ben Clegg, Monique Simulating Organizations using Computational and Lambert & Ray Human Agents Buettner Singleton LAP TOP DEMOS LapTop Demos 5:10-6:30 pm 2 CASOS 2001 – Conference Friday July 6, 2001 Time Location Speaker Title 8:00-9:00 am Seagate Atrium Registration for Conference 8:30-9:00 am Seagate Atrium Continental Session 3 9:00-9:30 am Singleton Robert Reynolds & Cultural and Social Evolution in Dynamic Environments Saleh Saleem 9:30-10:00 am Singleton Jürgen Klüver Systems Dynamics, Evolutionary Principles and a Sociocultural Algorithm: Answering a Weberian Question 10:00-10:30 am Singleton John Patty Towards a Computational Theory of Equilibrium Selection 10:30-11:00 am Seagate Atrium Break Session 4 11:00-11:30 am Singleton Keiki Takadama, Computational Analysis of Brand Marketing Naohiro Tsujinaka, & Katsunori Shimohara 11:30-12:00 pm Singleton Richard Burton, Børge The Lost Performance of Misfits: Obel & Michael Roach A Dynamic Approach to Fit and Firm Performance 12:00-12:30 pm Singleton Hiroshi Deguchi Platform Externality and Lockin 12:30-2:00 pm Seagate Atrium Lunch Session 5 2:00-2:30 pm Singleton Maarten Sierhaus Modeling and Simulation for Work System Design 2:30-3:00 pm Singleton Kent Wickstrom Jensen Designing Projects: An Evaluation of a Computational Simulation Model in the Context of small Software Design Projects 3:00-3:30 pm Singleton Ashish Arora, Hierarchies Vs Markets: Using an Agent-based Vidyanand Choudhary, Marketplace Karthik Kannan, Ramayya Krishnan, & Rema Padman 3:30-4:00 pm Seagate Atrium Break Session 6 4:00-4:30 pm Singleton Greg Adams Beyond Control: Modeling Political Parties as Decentralized, Voluntary Organizations 4:30-5:00 pm Singleton Klaus Jaffe The Economy of Altruism 5:00-5:30 pm Singleton “Connie” Yu Yuan The Threshold Model of Collective Action Revisited 5:30-7:00 pm Danforth Rm Reception University Center 7:00-10:00 pm Schatz Dining Michael Cohen Keynote Dinner University Center 3 CASOS 2001 – Conference Saturday, July 7, 2001 Time Location Speaker Title 8:00-9:00 am Seagate Atrium Registration for Conference 8:30-9:00 am Seagate Atrium Continental Session 7 9:00-9:30 am Singleton Pietro Panzarasa, Modeling Structure and Cognition in Organizations: A Kathleen Carley and Meta-Network Computational Approach David Krackhardt 9:30-10:00 am Singleton David Krackhardt and Leveraged Diffusion Scott Feld 10:00-10:30 am Singleton Marshall van Alstyne Modeling Information Growth and Diffusion as a Function of Network Structure 10:30-11:00 am Seagate Atrium Break Session 8 Singleton Rob Cross Information Seeking in Social Context: Personal and 11:00-11:30 am Impersonal Sources Employed in Intentional Search 11:30-12:00 pm Singleton Marcelo Cataldo Modeling Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Organizations 12:00-12:30 pm Singleton Kathleen Carley & Tradeoffs Between Performance and Adaptability for Yuqing Ren Organizational Architectures 12:30-2:00 pm Seagate Atrium Lunch Session 9 2:00-2:30 pm Singleton Cleotilde Instance-based decision making in Dynamic Gonzalez Environments: Modeling the Learning Process 2:30-3:00 pm Singleton Faison Gibson Learning and transfer in dynamic decision environments 3:00-3:30 pm Singleton Douglas Samuelson Modeling the Effect of Uncertainty on Attention Seeking and Decision-Making 3:30-4:00 pm Seagate Atrium Break Session 10 4:00-4:30 pm Singleton Shingo Takahashi An Evolutionary Model of the Double-loop Learning as a Module of Organizational Learning 4:30-5:00 pm Singleton Yuqing Ren, Kathleen Simulating the Role of Transactive Memory in Group Carley & Linda Argote Training and Performance 5:00-5:30 pm Singleton Monique Lambert, John Hierarchies and Transactive Memory Systems: Crafting a Kunz, Raymond Levitt Model of Flexible Exception Handling 5:30-6:00 pm Singleton Christina Stoica A model for creative ontogenesis 6:00-7:00 pm Singleton LAP TOP DEMOS LapTop Demos 4 CASOS 2001 – Conference Sunday July 8, 2001 Time Location Speaker Title 8:00-9:00 am Seagate Atrium Registration for Conference 8:30-9:00 am Seagate Atrium Continental Session 11 9:00-9:30 am Singleton Ivar Vermeulen and Organizational Differentiation: Jeroen Bruggeman The Population of Web Search Engines 9:30-10:00 am Singleton Li-Chiou Chen & A Computational Model of Computer Virus Propagation Kathleen Carley 10:00-10:30 am Singleton Ju-Sung Lee Evolving Drug Networks 10:30-11:00 am Seagate Atrium Break Session 12 Singleton Narjes Bellamine-Ben Simulating Extreme Collaboration: a Case Study 11:00-11:30 am Saoud & Gloria Mark 11:30-12:00 pm Singleton Satsuya Kurahashi & Can We Control Information Free Riders? Analyzing Takao Terano Communal Sharing Norms via Agent-based Simulation 12:00-12:30 pm Singleton Hiroyuki Matsui, Isao Learning Economics Principles from the Bottom by both Ono, Hiroshi Sato, Human and Software Agents – Outline of U-Mart Project Hiroshi Deguchi, Takao Terano, Hajime Kita and Yoshinori Shiozawa 12:30-2:00 pm Seagate Atrium Lunch Business Meeting 5 Demos Presenter Software July 5 July 7 Jana Diesner & Eleanor Lewis Automap Yes Yes Yuqing Ren & Ju-Sung Lee Orgahead Yes Yes Yuqing Ren & Alex Yahja Construct-o Yes Yes Hiroyuki Matsui & Yasuyuki Koyama U-Mart Yes Yes Marshall van Alstyne Framework for Diffusion Models No Yes Max Tsvetovat Agent Factory Yes Yes Carter Butts Network Software Yes Yes Maarten Sierhaus Brahams No Yes Klaus Jaffe Biodynamics, Semstat, Sociodynamics Yes Yes Ben Clegg DREAMS Yes Yes 6 The Interaction Topology of Simulated Agents: New Research Lines and their Problems of Cumulation Michael Cohen University of Michigan Professor of Information and Public Policy The University of Michigan School of Information University of Michigan 312 West Hall Ann Arbor, MI. 48109-1092 Phone: (734) 647-8027 Fax: (734) 764-2475 E-Mail: [email protected] Biography Michael Cohen is Professor of Information and Public Policy at The University of Michigan. He has served as an External Faculty Member of the Santa Fe Institute and a long term consultant at the Xerox Palo Alto Research Center. Cohen's research centers on processes of learning and adaptation that go on within organizations as they adjust to their changing environments. He has written numerous articles contributing to the theories of organizational decision making and learning – many employing computer simulation. The most influential of these is "A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice," a "citation classic" co-authored with James G. March and Johan P. Olsen. It was one of the earliest usees of what is now called "agent-based simulation" as a tool for refining theories of organizational process. He is also the.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download Article (PDF)
    Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 124 International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Humanities (ICCESSH 2017) Information Ecology in Structuring Sociocultural Space of Modern Society Eleonora Barkova Department of History and Philosophy Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (PRUE) Stremyanny per., 36, Moscow, 117997, Russia E-mail: [email protected] Marina Ivleva Elena Agibalova Department of History and Philosophy Department of Foreign Languages № 3 Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (PRUE) Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (PRUE) Stremyanny per., 36, Moscow, 117997, Russia Stremyanny per., 36, Moscow, 117997, Russia Abstract—The article studies potential application of an living, for the ecosystem on all the levels were also identified. information ecology approach for the analysis of a V.A.Kutyrev was right to say that today “it’s important…to contemporary stage in the development of an information suggest some sort of a modus vivendi between realism and society. It is illustrated using the example of this approach modernism that reflects our natural, objective macro world utilized to study a social element – sociocultural space. The and post-modernism as, actually, the ideology of other, article analyses distinctive features of information ecology as a informative-virtual micro and mega worlds. Ecological modern philosophical approach based on holistic and problems that had been referred to nature not long ago, systematic principles which provides
    [Show full text]
  • A Politico-Ecological Approach of Transitional Spaces in Social Ecological Systems
    A Politico-Ecological Approach of Transitional Spaces in Social Ecological Systems Alfredo Lascoutx Ruiz Thesis submitted to the University of Ottawa in partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the PhD degree in Philosophy School of Political Studies Faculty of Social Sciences University of Ottawa © Alfredo Lascoutx Ruiz, Ottawa, Canada, 2021 AUTHOR’S DECLARATION FOR ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF A THESIS I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Dedication I dedicate this work to Roman, Bram, Aura Karina, Claudia, Manuel, Carlos Juan, Andres Miguel, Camilo, Naomi and Lenny To my family and friends, who have supported me emotionally and financially during the difficult years. My sons, Carlos Juan and Andres Miguel, always giving me motivation and practical assistance. This thesis would not have been possible without your love, support and constant patience. To my ancestors Rodriguez, who struggled along with me every night to obtain this doctorate. To the memory of my father Carlos Lascoutx, my mother Clara Ruiz, my aunt Maria Rios, and my uncle Miguel Ruiz, who always encouraged me to carry on with my studies. To my friends, Daniela Bettiol, Armando Aranguren, Manelly Vera, Gabriel Pilonieta, Luis Vizcaya, Ismael Santos, Lastenia Narvaez, Cesar Diaz, Isaac Nahon, Johan Hamels, Luis Barnola, Ginette Sharp, who have shown their love, friendship and solidarity in many different ways. I really thank you all. Y siempre a Dios y la Virgen que nunca me abandonan.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 SOCIAL SYSTEMS, THEIR OBSERVATION and DESCRIPTION Full Paper Nicholas Paritsis Laboratory of Cybernetics and Systems Behavior
    1 SOCIAL SYSTEMS, THEIR OBSERVATION AND DESCRIPTION Full paper Nicholas Paritsis Laboratory of Cybernetics and Systems Behavior, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Crete, Greece [email protected] For the Symposion on Sociocybernetics in European Systems Science Union (ESSU) 6th Congress INTRODUCTION Einstein (Einstein et al 1930) considered that to understand the cause’s one level of description is insufficient. Systemism being holism and individualism (Bunde 1996) makes system science to be at the same line. Paritsis and Stewart (1983) regarding the brain, namely that for the description of the brain processes concluded that it is better to make a description at the level of neurons, at the level of their relations and at the level of global properties of the neural network. Social constructionism presents an analogous view. In the sense that the perception and representation of a point of view rests upon the contribution of three levels that interact. The level of views of the person(s) in a socio-cultural system, the level of their communication (communicative relations) and the level of the culture itself Social costructionism (e.g. Berger and Luckmann 1966) is related to a certain extend, conceptually, to constructivist point of view that reality is constructed, that in turn is related with the autopoietic perception and epistemology (Maturana and Varela 1980). According to the last view the autopoietic systems -mainly the living systems- have the ability to maintain their characteristic structure and function independent from the different environments they may live. Thus, when the environment is perceived by a living system, a transformation takes place on the perceived environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Systems Theory"
    General By the same author: System Modern Theories of Development (in German, English, Spani~h) Nikolaus von Kues Theory Lebenswissenschaft und Bildung Theoretische Biologie J Foundations, Development, Applications Das Gefüge des Lebens Vom Molekül zur Organismenwelt Problems of Life (in German, English, French, Spanish, Dutch, Japanese) Auf den Pfaden des Lebens I by Ludwig von Bertalanffy Biophysik des Fliessgleichgewichts t Robots, Men and Minds University of Alberta Edmonton) Canada GEORGE BRAZILLER New York MANIBUS Nicolai de Cusa Cardinalis, Gottfriedi Guglielmi Leibnitii, ]oannis Wolfgangi de Goethe Aldique Huxleyi, neenon de Bertalanffy Pauli, S.J., antecessoris, cosmographi Copyright © 1968 by Ludwig von Bertalanffy All rights in this hook are reserved. For information address the publisher, George Braziller, lnc. One Park Avenue New York, N.Y. 10016 Foreword The present volume appears to demand some introductory notes clarifying its scope, content, and method of presentation. There is a large number of texts, monographs, symposia, etc., devoted to "systems" and "systems theory". "Systems Science," or one of its many synonyms, is rapidly becoming part of the estab­ lished university curriculum. This is predominantly a develop­ ment in engineering science in the broad sense, necessitated by the complexity of "systems" in modern technology, man-machine relations, programming and similar considerations which were not felt in yesteryear's technology but which have become im­ perative in the complex technological and social structures of the modern world. Systems theory, in this sense, is preeminently a mathematica! field, offering partly novel and highly sophisti­ cated techniques, closely linked with computer science, and essentially determined by the requirement to cope with a new sort of problem that has been appearing.
    [Show full text]
  • Society As a Complex Adaptive System
    59. Society as a CompIex Adaptive System WALTER DUCKLEY WE HAVE ARGUED at some length in another place1 istic is its functioning to maintain the given struc- that the mechanical equilibrium model and the ture of the system within pre-established limits. It organismic homeostasis models of society that involves feedback loops with its environment, and have underlain most modern sociological theory possibly information as well as pure energy inter- have outlived their usefulness. A more viable changes, but these are geared principally to self- model, one much more faithful to the kind of regubtion (structure maintenance) rather than adap- system that society is more and more recognized tation (change of system structure). The complex to k,is in process of developing out of, or is in adaptive systems {species, psychological and socio- keeping with, the modern systems perspective cultural systems) are also open and negentropic. (which we use loosely here to refer to general But they are oppn "internally" us well as externally systems research, cybernetics, information and in that the interchanges among their components communication theory, and related fields). Society, may result in significant changr.s in the nature of or the sociocultural system, is not, then, principally the components theinselves with important con- an equilibrium system or a homeostatic system, sequences for the system as a whole. And the but what we shalt simply refer to as a complex energy level that may be mobilized by the system adaptive system. is subject to relatively wide fluctuation. Internal To summarize the argument in ove~lysimplified as well as external interchanges are mediated form: Equilibria1 systems are relatively closed and characteristically by infirmation flows (via chemi- entropic.
    [Show full text]
  • Contextual Adaptation. Human Functioning As Dynamic Interaction: a Social Work Perspective
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Doctorate in Social Work (DSW) Dissertations School of Social Policy and Practice Spring 5-13-2013 Contextual Adaptation. Human Functioning as Dynamic Interaction: A Social Work Perspective Naomi B F Pollock University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations_sp2 Part of the Social Work Commons Recommended Citation Pollock, Naomi B F, "Contextual Adaptation. Human Functioning as Dynamic Interaction: A Social Work Perspective" (2013). Doctorate in Social Work (DSW) Dissertations. 35. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations_sp2/35 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations_sp2/35 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Contextual Adaptation. Human Functioning as Dynamic Interaction: A Social Work Perspective Abstract Despite the recent development of theories in the social sciences that define human development and functioning in an integrated, nuanced and complex manner, the social work concept of “person-in- environment” remains outdated and limited. This is in part due to the “person” and “environment”--the biological, psychological, and social environments--being defined in distinction from one another. In order to remain current and effective in arguing on behalf of a clear professional voice in the field, social workers must not only engender but also promote a fundamental practice perspective that addresses complexity. A reformulation of “person-in-environment” can help social workers more fully realize the desire to unite under the common professional mandates requiring that both a “person-in-environment” perspective and a full biopsychosocial picture be taken into clinical accounts. To meet this aim I develop the concept of contextual adaptation, a new definition of person-in-envir“ onment” reliant on tenets of nonlinear dynamic systems theory, specifically chaos theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology in an Anthropogenic Biosphere
    ESA CENTENNIAL PAPER Ecological Monographs, 85(3), 2015, pp. 287–331 Ó 2015 by the Ecological Society of America Ecology in an anthropogenic biosphere 1 ERLE C. ELLIS Department of Geography and Environmental Systems, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, 1000 Hiltop Circle, Baltimore, Maryland 21250 USA Abstract. Humans, unlike any other multicellular species in Earth’s history, have emerged as a global force that is transforming the ecology of an entire planet. It is no longer possible to understand, predict, or successfully manage ecological pattern, process, or change without understanding why and how humans reshape these over the long term. Here, a general causal theory is presented to explain why human societies gained the capacity to globally alter the patterns, processes, and dynamics of ecology and how these anthropogenic alterations unfold over time and space as societies themselves change over human generational time. Building on existing theories of ecosystem engineering, niche construction, inclusive inheritance, cultural evolution, ultrasociality, and social change, this theory of anthroecological change holds that sociocultural evolution of subsistence regimes based on ecosystem engineering, social specialization, and non-kin exchange, or ‘‘sociocultural niche construction,’’ is the main cause of both the long-term upscaling of human societies and their unprecedented transformation of the biosphere. Human sociocultural niche construction can explain, where classic ecological theory cannot, the sustained transformative effects of human societies on biogeography, ecological succession, ecosystem processes, and the ecological patterns and processes of landscapes, biomes, and the biosphere. Anthroecology theory generates empirically testable hypotheses on the forms and trajectories of long-term anthropogenic ecological change that have significant theoretical and practical implications across the subdisciplines of ecology and conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • A Systems Wew of Leisure's Role Ir the Sgciocultural
    A SYSTEMS WEW OF LEISURE’S ROLE IR THE SGCIOCULTURAL SYSTEM Thesis for the Degree of M. S. MECHGAN STAKE UNE‘JERSSTY JOSEPH DAVi‘D STEPHANSKY 1976 ABSTRACT A SYSTEMS VIEW OF LEISURB'S ROLE IN THE SOCIOCULTURAL SYSTEM By Joseph David Stephansky A purpose for leisure in the Operation and maintenance of society is sought. A model of the sociocultural system is used to identify the necessary processes for the operation of a functional social system; i.e., a social system which allows its members to reach what they see as adequate satisfaction of their needs and desires. Two sets of processes are necessary: structure maintaining processes, which temporarily preserve interaction patterns in order to give some regularity and predictability to the world, and structure changing forces, which allow the system to adapt to changing conditions, to better let the system fulfill the needs of its members. It is contended that leisure plays an important role in the structure changing processes; leisure contributes not only to the survival of a functional sociocultural system, but also to its daily Operation. Social structure is an event structure composed of interaction patterns. Joseph David Stephansky At any one point in time, the interaction patterns are determined by the set of rules used by the members of society. Social rules change through deviance. Deviance means not only finding present rules inadequate to handle a situation and violating them, but also reinterpretation and construction of new rules to guide action. Leisure contributes to the rule change process in two ways. First, as a state of mind characterized by a feeling of a lack of constraint on behaviors, leisure leads to a higher probability of existing rules not being called to mind or being held irrelevant in a particular interactional situation, thereby affecting the analogizing process to a new rule meaning.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Scale and Food System Sustainability in the Pacific
    CULTURAL SCALE AND FOOD SYSTEM SUSTAINABILITY IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST: COLUMBIA BASIN CASE STUDIES By TROY M. WILSON A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY Department of Anthropology MAY 2011 To the Faculty of Washington State University: The members of the Committee appointed to examine the dissertation of TROY M. WILSON find it satisfactory and recommend that it be accepted. _____________________________________ John H. Bodley, Ph.D., Chair _____________________________________ Nancy P. McKee, Ph.D. _____________________________________ Andrew Duff, Ph.D. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The completion of this dissertation owes much to my committee whose combined efforts strengthened the study considerably. My committee chair, John Bodley, helped me formulate this research and he facilitated its completion. John‘s enthusiasm for research, enduring patience as a mentor, and awareness of current issues in wide-ranging places will always amaze and motivate me. Nancy McKee supplied her marvelous wit, endless inspiration, and valuable discussions on research methods. Andrew Duff provided big picture questions, practical guidance, and valuable commentary on content and theory. I am extremely grateful for my committee‘s constructive comments and aid in editing this dissertation. I could not have had a better committee. The research that led to this dissertation was supported by a National Science Foundation Dissertation Improvement Grant (#0852618), a fellowship in Environmental Studies from Boeing, and a fellowship from the Thomas S. Foley Institute for Public Policy and Public Service. Additional support came from the WSU Department of Anthropology via the Elaine Burgess Graduate Fellowship and the Phyllis and Richard Daugherty Scholarship for Graduate Student Excellence.
    [Show full text]
  • A Socio-Technical-Cultural System Perspective to Rethinking Translation Technology in Intercultural Communication
    Communication & Language at Work (2020) Vol. 7(1), 100-110 A Socio-technical-cultural System Perspective to Rethinking Translation Technology in Intercultural Communication Mei Li Ph.D., Northeastern University, China [email protected] Chunfang Zhou Associate Professor, Aalborg University, Denmark [email protected] Lars Bo Henriksen Associate Professor, Aalborg University, Denmark [email protected] Abstract As technology has radically changed language translation in the age of globalization, the research on translation technology should not only benefit current research on translation of languages but also have a long-term positive impact on technology in the sociocultural context. The focuses of this paper are twofold. Firstly, it discusses how translation technology drives the changes in intercultural communication that bring both bright and dark sides. Secondly, it explores how translation technology’s involvement and interaction with human translator in practice of language translation from a socio-technical-cultural system perspective. Based on the discussion, this paper particularly addresses human translator’s collaboration with translation technology should be regarded as a cultural mediator helping to realize successful intercultural communication; and meanwhile, the human translator’ s subjectivity should be highlighted, and translation technology’s cultural design should be explored in order to improve usability that further brings benefits to the future cultural mediator. 101 M. Li, C. Zhou, L. B. Henriksen Communication & Language at Work (2020) Vol. 7(1), 100-110 Keywords Intercultural Communication, Translation Technology, Socio-technical-cultural System, Human Translator, Cultural Mediator 1 Introduction ‘Translation’ etymologically, means ‘carrying across’ or ‘bringing across’. It is derived from the Latin word ‘translatio’ which comes from ‘transferre’, be made up of ‘trans’ means ‘across’ and ‘ferre’ means ‘to carry’ or ‘to bring’.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Structure and Ecotourism Development on Bonaire 31 Social Structure and Ecotourism Development on Bonaire
    EMERGY SYNTHESIS 2: Theory and Applications of the Emergy Methodology Proceedings from the Second Biennial Emergy Analysis Research Conference, Gainesville, Florida, September, 2001. Edited by Mark T. Brown University of Florida Gainesville, Florida Associate Editors Howard T. Odum University of Florida Gainesville, Florida David Tilley University of Maryland College Park, Maryland Sergio Ulgiati University of Siena Siena, Italy December 2003 The Center for Environmental Policy Department of Environmental Engineering Sciences University of Florida Gainesville, FL The Center for Environmental Policy P.O. Box 116450 vi Chapter 31. Social Structure and Ecotourism Development on Bonaire 31 Social Structure and Ecotourism Development on Bonaire Thomas Abel ABSTRACT Emergy analysis was used to evaluate the impacts of recent ecotourism development on the island of Bonaire, N.A. One portion of that research focused on transformations in social structure. This paper will discuss the methods applied to this emergy analysis of socials structure. Comparison and contrast is made to more conventional models of “culture” in systems ecology. Results suggest that political-ecological considerations should be incorporated into the modeling of human systems by emergy researchers. This will result in researchers asking questions in different ways, and making significantly different policy recommendations. INTRODUCTION Energy Hierarchy and Sociocultural Self-Organization It can be argued that human-ecosystem relationships co-evolve through the mutual development of self-organizing autocatalytic processes that maximize empower in the system as a whole. In human prehistory, the self-organization of human population, rudimentary technologies, social structural differ- entiation, language and cultural models resulted in the capture of additional ecosystem energies for human groups.
    [Show full text]
  • RR-796: Acequias of the Southwestern United States
    Acequias of the Southwestern United States: Elements of Resilience in a Coupled Natural and Human System AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION • RESEARCH REPORT 796 Compiled by Adrienne Rosenberg, editor, and Steven Guldan, Alexander G. “Sam” Fernald, and José Rivera, associate editors College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences New Mexico State University aces.nmsu.edu/pubs TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword .........................................................................................................................................................1 Editor’s preface ...............................................................................................................................................3 Part 1—Overview “Key Concepts for a Multidisciplinary Approach to Acequias” (Sylvia Rodríguez) .....................................4 Part 2—Disciplinary Research “The Roots of Community in the Northern Rio Grande: Acequia Mutualism, Cultural Endurance, and Resilience” (José A. Rivera) .................................................................................13 “Acequia Ecosystems” (Kenneth G. Boykin, Elizabeth A. Samson, and Guillermo Alvarez) .....................21 “Surface Water and Groundwater Interactions in Acequia Systems of Northern New Mexico” (Carlos G. Ochoa, Steve J. Guldan, and Sam Fernald) .....................................33 “The Role of Livestock in Supporting Acequia Communities of Northern New Mexico” (Stephanie C. López, Andrés F. Cibils, Lilian Cibils, Ursula R. Smedly, Steve J. Guldan,
    [Show full text]