DOCSLIB.ORG

An Application of General Systems Theory to the Determination of the Nature of Accounting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Application of General Systems Theory to the Determination of the Nature of Accounting Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1970 An Application of General Systems Theory to the Determination of the Nature of Accounting. Robert Eldon Bailey Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Bailey, Robert Eldon, "An Application of General Systems Theory to the Determination of the Nature of Accounting." (1970). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 1819. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/1819 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 71-6539 BAILEY, Eldon Robert, 1935- AN APPLICATION OF GENERAL SYSTEMS THEORY TO THE DETERMINATION OF THE NATURE OF ACCOUNTING. The Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Ph.D., 1970 Accounting University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan THIS DISSERTATION HAS BEEN MICROFILMED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED AN APPLICATION OF GENERAL SYSTEMS THEORY TO THE DETERMINATION OF THE NATURE OF ACCOUNTING A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Accounting by, Eldon R. Bailey B.S., McNeese State College, 1957 M.B.A., Louisiana State University, i960 August, 1970 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The writer wishes to express appreciation to Dr. Fritz A. Me Cameron, Professor and. Head of the Department of Accounting, Loui­ siana State University, and Dr. Ehniel G. Kyle, Assistant Professor of Accounting, for reading and commenting on the manuscript during its preparation. The writer also wishes to acknowledge the helpful suggestions made by Dr. Herbert G. Hicks, Professor of Management, and to express appreciation to the other members of the dissertation committee, Dr. C. Willard Elliott, Associate Professor of Accounting, and Dr. Donald E. Vaughn, Associate Professor of Business Finance. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT..................................... ii LIST OF FIGURES ..................................... v ABSTRACT .......................................... v± CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION ............................... 1 Purpose of the Study Approach and Methodology Limitations of the Study II. THE NATURE OF GENERAL SYSTEMS THEORY ........... 8 The Need for General Systems Theory The Development of General Systems Theory The Realm of Systems Theory ’* System” Defined Open vs. Closed Systems Variations and Applications of Systems Theory Summary III. THE NATURE OF OPEN S YSTEMS................... 32 Hierarchical Order Elements of Systems Characteristics of System Behavior I)ynamics of Systems A System Model Summary IV. THE APPLICATION OF GENERAL SYSTEMS THEORY TO ACCOUNTING................................. ?8 The Problem of the Nature of Accounting Accounting as a System Summary iv CHAPTER PAGE V. THE ELEMENTS OF ACCOUNTING AS A SYSTEM ....... 102 Environment Objective Boundary Inputs and Outputs Production Components Management and Information Components Summary VI. THE BEHAVIOR OF ACCOUNTING AS A SYSTEM .......... 139 Accounting as a Process Ifcmamics of Accounting as a System Summary VII. THE NATURE OF ACCOUNTING...................... 152 A Definition of Accounting Accounting as a Body of Knowledge Accounting as a Profession Accounting Education Summary VUI. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ...................... 168 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY................................. X75 VITA ................................................ 186 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE PAGE 2-1. A Simple Cybernetic System...................... 23 2-2. Schematic Diagram of a General Communication System............................................. ^5 3-1. A Self-Regulating S y s t e m ........................ 72 5-1. A Nesting of Systems...........................1^3 ABSTRACT Accounting as a profession and body of knowledge has a long his­ tory of service in the conduct of the economic affairs of mankind. In recent years, however, change in all areas of human endeavor has forced accountants to reevaluate the role of their discipline in society and to seek to expand its boundaries in order to maintain and increase its importance as a discipline. General systems theory is a developing body of concepts which can be quite useful in the effort to describe the nature of accounting. These concepts are based on the assumption that the entire universe can be viewed as a hierarchical structure of systems, a system being apy complex of elements in mutual interaction. The purpose of the study here is to identify the basic concepts of general systems theory and to describe the nature of accounting within the systems framework. The view of human organizations taken in this study is based on the concept of the cybernetic system. Qybernetic systems maintain a state of self-regulation through the feedback process. Human orga­ nizations will be most effective if they operate as self-regulating systems with three basic groups of components— management, production, and information. The management components control the system, the production components process inputs into outputs, and the information components measure and communicate feedback information. The role of accounting should be to act as the feedback information component of self-regulating human organizations of all kinds. The basic elements of the structure of any system are the envi­ ronment, objective, boundary, inputs and outputs, and components. The environment of accounting includes primarily the organizations in which it functions as information component. The basic objective of any sys­ tem is considered to be survival, which is achieved through production of output useful to the suprasystem. The objective of accounting then is the production of information output of maximum usefulness to its suprasystem. The boundary of accounting is the state of affairs which identifies it and links it with its environment. In one respect this boundary is determined by tradition or general acceptance, but ideally it should be determined by a structure of accounting theory. Mainte­ nance inputs from the suprasystem sustain accounting, while signal in­ puts are selected for processing into information output. The output of accounting results from the measurement and communication activities of the two basic production components of accounting— accounting for external users and management accounting. Accounting ideally should function as a self-regulating system, in specific organizations and. in the aggregate as a profession. A system in a condition of maintained self-regulation is said to have achieved, a steady state. The steady state of accounting should be that of constant production of useful information output through an adaptive system structure. The process of adaptation inevitably means growth and expansion, and accounting may grow quantitatively by multiplication of usual activities and. qualitatively through incorporation within its boundary of other information techniques so as to maintain and. improve the usefulness of its output. Accounting may be defined as the system for the measurement and communication of feedback information on the state and process of human organizations. Accounting is considered to encompass the entire scope of feedback information production. As a body of knowledge, accounting should consist of a framework of general principles based on general systems concepts. As a profession, accounting should be staffed, with information specialists capable of functioning in any organization. The responsibility of accounting education should be production of graduates inspired by an understanding of accounting*s vital role in human affairs and equipped with the knowledge that will enable them to fulfill that role. CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Purpose of the Study Rapid change in all areas of human endeavor has become the basic characteristic of the second half of the twentieth century.1 The rush of technological advances sweeps away the old technology and makes prod­ ucts, processes, and equipment obsolescent from the moment they are con­ ceived. The development and application of the electronic computer has had a most profound effect in recent years. The vast information stor­ age and processing capabilities of this instrument have either caused or made possible many of the changes and achievements in science, busi­ ness, government, and other areas.2 Change is rampant not only in technology and science but also in the areas of human behavior and social organization. New technology, scientific progress, and rapid change itself have undoubtedly had pro­ found, pervasive, but poorly understood effects on the mores of human society. ^■This conclusion has been reached by numerous writers. Max Ways states: "The great new truth about humanity is change, movement." Max Ways, "Gearing U.S. Policy to the World’s Great Trends," Fortune, LXXIX (May 1, 1969), p. 65. A recent book that explores the pervasive effect of the computer is John Diebold, Man and the Computer: Technology as an Agent of Social Change (New York: Frederick A. Praeger, Inc., 1969). 2 The accountant of today finds that his area of knowledge has not escaped the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Systems Thinking: Managing Chaos and Complexity This Page Intentionally Left Blank Systems Thinking: Managing Chaos and Complexity
    Systems Thinking: Managing Chaos and Complexity This Page Intentionally Left Blank Systems Thinking: Managing Chaos and Complexity A Platform for Designing Business Architecture SECOND EDITION Jamshid Gharajedaghi AMSTERDAM • BOSTON • HEIDELBERG • LONDON NEW YORK • OXFORD • PARIS • SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO • SINGAPORE • SYDNEY • TOKYO Butterworth-Heinemann is an imprint of Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann is an imprint of Elsevier 30 Corporate Drive, Suite 400, Burlington, MA 01803, USA 525 B Street, Suite 1900, San Diego, California 92101-4495, USA 84 Theobald's Road, London WC1X 8RR, UK This book is printed on acid-free paper. Copyright © 2006, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Science & Technology Rights Department in Oxford, UK: phone: (+44) 1865 843830, fax: (+44) 1865 853333, E-mail: [email protected]. You may also complete your request on-line via the Elsevier homepage (http://elsevier.com), by selecting “Support & Contact” then “Copyright and Permission” and then “Obtaining Permissions.” Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Gharajedaghi, Jamshid. Systems thinking : managing chaos and complexity : a platform for designing business architecture / Jamshid Gharajedaghi. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-7506-7163-7 (alk. paper) 1. System analysis. 2. Chaotic behavior in systems. 3. Industrial management. 4. Technological complexity. I. Title. T57.6.G52 1999 003—dc21 98-55939 British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article (PDF)
    Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 124 International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Humanities (ICCESSH 2017) Information Ecology in Structuring Sociocultural Space of Modern Society Eleonora Barkova Department of History and Philosophy Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (PRUE) Stremyanny per., 36, Moscow, 117997, Russia E-mail: [email protected] Marina Ivleva Elena Agibalova Department of History and Philosophy Department of Foreign Languages № 3 Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (PRUE) Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (PRUE) Stremyanny per., 36, Moscow, 117997, Russia Stremyanny per., 36, Moscow, 117997, Russia Abstract—The article studies potential application of an living, for the ecosystem on all the levels were also identified. information ecology approach for the analysis of a V.A.Kutyrev was right to say that today “it’s important…to contemporary stage in the development of an information suggest some sort of a modus vivendi between realism and society. It is illustrated using the example of this approach modernism that reflects our natural, objective macro world utilized to study a social element – sociocultural space. The and post-modernism as, actually, the ideology of other, article analyses distinctive features of information ecology as a informative-virtual micro and mega worlds. Ecological modern philosophical approach based on holistic and problems that had been referred to nature not long ago, systematic principles which provides
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Complexity of the Theory and Social Thought That Contribute to Contemporary Planning
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 101 432 EA 006 709 AUTHOR Gutenschwager, Gerald TITLE Planning and Social Theory: A Selected Bibliography. Exchange Bibliography No. 179. INSTITUTION Council of Planning Librarians, Monticello, Ill. PUB DATE Mar 71 NOTE 13p. AVAILABLE FROMCouncil of Planning Librarians, P.O. Box 229, Monticello, Illinois 61856 ($1.50) EDRS PRICE MF-$0.76 HC-$1.58 PLUS POSTAGE DESCRIPTORS *Bibliographies; City Planning; Decision Making; Futures (of Society); Information Theory; Organizational Theories; *Planning; Policy Formation; Social Change; *Social Factors; *Social Sciences; Systems Analysis; Technological Advancement; *Theories ABSTRACT This bibliography's meant to reflect the growing diversity and complexity of the theory and social thought that contribute to contemporary planning. The purpose of this bibliography is to explore this diversity as it pertains to the various biases in planning as a social process. The organization of the document reflects the various levels--individual, organizational, social, and urban--at which social theory has been formulated with pertinence to planning.(Author/MLF) Council of Planning LibrariansEXCHANGE BIBLIOGRAPHIES March 1971 1 PLANNING AND SOCIAL THEORY: A Selected Bibliography Gerald Gutenschwagcr, Associate Professor of Planning School or Architecture, Washington University, Saint Louis .`i4'4 . '4.1 '4" OF HI At nt 11 ARE Tt t OC . 00.10. tovi 8ts1 Mrs. Mary Vance, Editor Post Office Box 229. Monticello, Illinois61856 2 COUNCIL OF PLANNING LIBRARIANS Exchange Bibliography #179 PLANNING AND SOCIAL THEORY: A SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY Gerald Gutenschwager Associate Professor of Plpnning School of Architecture Washington University Saint Louis INTRODUCTION The following bibliography is meant to reflect the growing diversity and complexity of theory and social thought which contributes tocontemporary 'planning as a professional discipline.
    [Show full text]
  • Consciousness and Its Evolution: from a Human Being to a Post-Human
    Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie Wydział Filozofii i Socjologii Taras Handziy Consciousness and Its Evolution: From a Human Being to a Post-Human Rozprawa doktorska napisana pod kierunkiem dr hab. Zbysława Muszyńskiego, prof. nadzw. UMCS Lublin 2014 Table of Contents Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………. 8 Chapter 1: Consciousness, Mind, and Body …………………………………………………… 18 1.1 Conceptions of Consciousness …………………………………………………………. 18 1.1.1 Colin McGinn’s Conception of Consciousness ……………………………………….... 18 1.1.1.1 Owen Flanagan’s Analysis of Colin McGinn’s Conception of Consciousness ….…….. 20 1.1.2 Paola Zizzi’s Conception of Consciousness ………………………………………….… 21 1.1.3 William James’ Stream of Consciousness ……………………………………………… 22 1.1.4 Ervin Laszlo’s Conception of Consciousness …………………………………………... 22 1.2 Consciousness and Soul ………………………………………...………………………. 24 1.3 Problems in Definition of Consciousness ………………………………………………. 24 1.4 Distinctions between Consciousness and Mind ………………………………………... 25 1.5 Problems in Definition of Mind ………………………………………………………… 26 1.6 Dogmatism in Mind and Mind without Dogmatism ……………………………………. 27 1.6.1 Dogmatism in Mind …………………………………………………………………….. 27 1.6.2 Mind without Dogmatism …………………………………………………………….… 28 1.6.3 Rupert Sheldrake’s Dogmatism in Science …………………………………………….. 29 1.7 Criticism of Scientific Approaches towards Study of Mind ……………….…………… 30 1.8 Conceptions of Mind …………………………………………………………………… 31 1.8.1 Rupert Sheldrake’s Conception of Extended Mind …………………………………….. 31 1.8.2 Colin McGinns’s Knowing and Willing Halves of Mind ……………………………..... 34 1.8.3 Francisco Varela’s, Evan Thompson’s, and Eleanor Rosch’s Embodied Mind ………... 35 1.8.4 Andy Clark’s Extended Mind …………………………………………………………... 35 1.8.5 Role of Mind Understood by Paola Zizzi ………………………………………………. 36 1.9 Mind in Buddhism, Consciousness in Tibetan Buddhism ……………………………… 36 1.9.1 Mind in Buddhism ……………………………………………………………………… 36 1.9.2 B.
    [Show full text]
  • Control Theory
    Control theory S. Simrock DESY, Hamburg, Germany Abstract In engineering and mathematics, control theory deals with the behaviour of dynamical systems. The desired output of a system is called the reference. When one or more output variables of a system need to follow a certain ref- erence over time, a controller manipulates the inputs to a system to obtain the desired effect on the output of the system. Rapid advances in digital system technology have radically altered the control design options. It has become routinely practicable to design very complicated digital controllers and to carry out the extensive calculations required for their design. These advances in im- plementation and design capability can be obtained at low cost because of the widespread availability of inexpensive and powerful digital processing plat- forms and high-speed analog IO devices. 1 Introduction The emphasis of this tutorial on control theory is on the design of digital controls to achieve good dy- namic response and small errors while using signals that are sampled in time and quantized in amplitude. Both transform (classical control) and state-space (modern control) methods are described and applied to illustrative examples. The transform methods emphasized are the root-locus method of Evans and fre- quency response. The state-space methods developed are the technique of pole assignment augmented by an estimator (observer) and optimal quadratic-loss control. The optimal control problems use the steady-state constant gain solution. Other topics covered are system identification and non-linear control. System identification is a general term to describe mathematical tools and algorithms that build dynamical models from measured data.
    [Show full text]
  • Manifesto for General Systems Transdisciplinarity
    www.systema -journal.org Systema 4(1) : 4-14 (2016) www.bcsss.org Manifesto for General Systems Transdisciplinarity David Rousseau1,2,3,4,5 *, Jennifer Wilby6,7,8,9,10, Julie Billingham11,12, and Stefan Blachfellner13,14,15,16,17 1 Director, Centre for Systems Philosophy, Surrey, UK 2 Visiting Research Fellow, Centre for Systems Studies, Business School, University of Hull, UK 3 Member of Scientific Council, Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science, Vienna, Austria 4 Honorary Research Fellow, Religious Experience Research Centre, School of Theology, Religious Studies and Islamic Studies, University of Wales Trinity Saint David, Lampeter, Wales, UK 5 Member, Centre for Spirituality Studies, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Hull, UK 6 Senior Visiting Fellow, Centre for Systems Studies, University of Hull, UK 7 Visiting Researcher, Willumstad School of Business, Adelphi University, Garden City, NY, USA 8 Academician, International Academy for Systems and Cybernetic Sciences, Vienna, Austria. 9 Vice President, International Society for the Systems Sciences 10 Member of Scientific Council, Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science, Vienna, Austria 11 Scientific Advisor, Centre for Systems Philosophy, Surrey, UK 12 Industry Principal, Business Strategy and Programs, Demandware Inc., Boston USA 13 Managing Director, Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science, Vienna, Austria 14 Managing Director, European Meetings on Cybernetics and Systems Research, Vienna, Austria 15 Vice President, International Federation for Systems Research, Vienna, Austria 16 Lecturer, University of Applied Science Upper Austria, Campus Steyr, Austria 17 Lecturer, Danube University Krems, Krems, Austria ABSTRACT In August 2015 the authors launched their Manifesto for General Systems Transdisciplinarity at the annual conference of the International Society for the Systems Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Systems Theory
    1 Systems Theory BRUCE D. FRIEDMAN AND KAREN NEUMAN ALLEN iopsychosocial assessment and the develop - nature of the clinical enterprise, others have chal - Bment of appropriate intervention strategies for lenged the suitability of systems theory as an orga - a particular client require consideration of the indi - nizing framework for clinical practice (Fook, Ryan, vidual in relation to a larger social context. To & Hawkins, 1997; Wakefield, 1996a, 1996b). accomplish this, we use principles and concepts The term system emerged from Émile Durkheim’s derived from systems theory. Systems theory is a early study of social systems (Robbins, Chatterjee, way of elaborating increasingly complex systems & Canda, 2006), as well as from the work of across a continuum that encompasses the person-in- Talcott Parsons. However, within social work, sys - environment (Anderson, Carter, & Lowe, 1999). tems thinking has been more heavily influenced by Systems theory also enables us to understand the the work of the biologist Ludwig von Bertalanffy components and dynamics of client systems in order and later adaptations by the social psychologist Uri to interpret problems and develop balanced inter - Bronfenbrenner, who examined human biological vention strategies, with the goal of enhancing the systems within an ecological environment. With “goodness of fit” between individuals and their its roots in von Bertalanffy’s systems theory and environments. Systems theory does not specify par - Bronfenbrenner’s ecological environment, the ticular theoretical frameworks for understanding ecosys tems perspective provides a framework that problems, and it does not direct the social worker to permits users to draw on theories from different dis - specific intervention strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Umpleby Stuart Reconsidering Cybernetics
    UMPLEBY STUART RECONSIDERING CYBERNETICS The field of cybernetics attracted great attention in the 1950s and 1960s with its prediction of a Second Industrial Revolution due to computer technology. In recent years few people in the US have heard of cybernetics (Umpleby, 2015a, see Figures 1 and 2 at the end of Paper). But a wave of recent books suggests that interest in cybernetics is returning (Umpleby and Hughes, 2016, see Figure at the end of Paper). This white paper reviews some basic ideas in cybernetics. I recommend these and other ideas as a resource for better understanding and modeling of social systems, including threat and response dynamics. Some may claim that whatever was useful has already been incorporated in current work generally falling under the complexity label, but that is not the case. Work in cybernetics has continued with notable contributions in recent years. Systems science, complex systems, and cybernetics are three largely independent fields with their own associations, journals and conferences (Umpleby, 2017). Four types of descriptions used in social science After working in social science and systems science for many years I realized that different academic disciplines use different basic elements. Economists use measurable variables such as price, savings, GDP, imports and exports. Psychologists focus on ideas, concepts and attitudes. Sociologists and political scientists focus on groups, organizations, and coalitions. Historians and legal scholars emphasize events and procedures. People trained in different disciplines construct different narratives using these basic elements. One way to reveal more of the variety in a social system is to create at least four descriptions – one each using variables, ideas, groups, and events (See the figures and tables in Medvedeva & Umpleby, 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • Two Canadian Case Studies Alex Ryan and Mark Leung
    RSD2 Relating Systems Thinking and Design 2013 working paper. www.systemic-design.net Systemic Design: Two Canadian Case Studies Alex Ryan and Mark Leung Always design a thing by considering it in its next larger context – a chair in a room, a room in a house, a house in an environment, an environment in a city plan —Eliel Saarinen1 A systems approach begins when first you see the world through the eyes of another —C. West Churchman2 Design is the future of systems methodology —Russ Ackoff3 Design is about unlocking the possibilities that lie within multiple perspectives. That design is about solving a complex problem with multiple constraints – John Maeda4 Introduction The currently fragmented state of ‘systems + design’ praxis is curious in light of the affinities between the two interdisciplines, as emphasized in the quotations above. To explain why designers and systems thinkers have not been talking to each other, we may look to their differences. Design as evolution of craft has been characterized as “thinking with your hands” and as such is rooted in an epistemology of practice.5 In contrast, the systems movement began with Ludwig von Bertalanffy’s General System Theory, which placed systems thinking above the disciplinary sciences, in order to provide a non-reductionist foundation for the unity of science.6 Whereas the designer learns by doing in concrete situations, the systems thinker’s knowledge accrues by abstracting away from the particular details of any specific instance of practice. But if this genealogy is sufficient to account for the lack of dialogue between and synthesis of systems + design, then the two interdisciplines are on a collision course.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Systems Theory?
    What is Systems Theory? Systems theory is an interdisciplinary theory about the nature of complex systems in nature, society, and science, and is a framework by which one can investigate and/or describe any group of objects that work together to produce some result. This could be a single organism, any organization or society, or any electro-mechanical or informational artifact. As a technical and general academic area of study it predominantly refers to the science of systems that resulted from Bertalanffy's General System Theory (GST), among others, in initiating what became a project of systems research and practice. Systems theoretical approaches were later appropriated in other fields, such as in the structural functionalist sociology of Talcott Parsons and Niklas Luhmann . Contents - 1 Overview - 2 History - 3 Developments in system theories - 3.1 General systems research and systems inquiry - 3.2 Cybernetics - 3.3 Complex adaptive systems - 4 Applications of system theories - 4.1 Living systems theory - 4.2 Organizational theory - 4.3 Software and computing - 4.4 Sociology and Sociocybernetics - 4.5 System dynamics - 4.6 Systems engineering - 4.7 Systems psychology - 5 See also - 6 References - 7 Further reading - 8 External links - 9 Organisations // Overview 1 / 20 What is Systems Theory? Margaret Mead was an influential figure in systems theory. Contemporary ideas from systems theory have grown with diversified areas, exemplified by the work of Béla H. Bánáthy, ecological systems with Howard T. Odum, Eugene Odum and Fritj of Capra , organizational theory and management with individuals such as Peter Senge , interdisciplinary study with areas like Human Resource Development from the work of Richard A.
    [Show full text]
  • Control System Design Methods
    Christiansen-Sec.19.qxd 06:08:2004 6:43 PM Page 19.1 The Electronics Engineers' Handbook, 5th Edition McGraw-Hill, Section 19, pp. 19.1-19.30, 2005. SECTION 19 CONTROL SYSTEMS Control is used to modify the behavior of a system so it behaves in a specific desirable way over time. For example, we may want the speed of a car on the highway to remain as close as possible to 60 miles per hour in spite of possible hills or adverse wind; or we may want an aircraft to follow a desired altitude, heading, and velocity profile independent of wind gusts; or we may want the temperature and pressure in a reactor vessel in a chemical process plant to be maintained at desired levels. All these are being accomplished today by control methods and the above are examples of what automatic control systems are designed to do, without human intervention. Control is used whenever quantities such as speed, altitude, temperature, or voltage must be made to behave in some desirable way over time. This section provides an introduction to control system design methods. P.A., Z.G. In This Section: CHAPTER 19.1 CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN 19.3 INTRODUCTION 19.3 Proportional-Integral-Derivative Control 19.3 The Role of Control Theory 19.4 MATHEMATICAL DESCRIPTIONS 19.4 Linear Differential Equations 19.4 State Variable Descriptions 19.5 Transfer Functions 19.7 Frequency Response 19.9 ANALYSIS OF DYNAMICAL BEHAVIOR 19.10 System Response, Modes and Stability 19.10 Response of First and Second Order Systems 19.11 Transient Response Performance Specifications for a Second Order
    [Show full text]
  • A Politico-Ecological Approach of Transitional Spaces in Social Ecological Systems
    A Politico-Ecological Approach of Transitional Spaces in Social Ecological Systems Alfredo Lascoutx Ruiz Thesis submitted to the University of Ottawa in partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the PhD degree in Philosophy School of Political Studies Faculty of Social Sciences University of Ottawa © Alfredo Lascoutx Ruiz, Ottawa, Canada, 2021 AUTHOR’S DECLARATION FOR ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF A THESIS I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Dedication I dedicate this work to Roman, Bram, Aura Karina, Claudia, Manuel, Carlos Juan, Andres Miguel, Camilo, Naomi and Lenny To my family and friends, who have supported me emotionally and financially during the difficult years. My sons, Carlos Juan and Andres Miguel, always giving me motivation and practical assistance. This thesis would not have been possible without your love, support and constant patience. To my ancestors Rodriguez, who struggled along with me every night to obtain this doctorate. To the memory of my father Carlos Lascoutx, my mother Clara Ruiz, my aunt Maria Rios, and my uncle Miguel Ruiz, who always encouraged me to carry on with my studies. To my friends, Daniela Bettiol, Armando Aranguren, Manelly Vera, Gabriel Pilonieta, Luis Vizcaya, Ismael Santos, Lastenia Narvaez, Cesar Diaz, Isaac Nahon, Johan Hamels, Luis Barnola, Ginette Sharp, who have shown their love, friendship and solidarity in many different ways. I really thank you all. Y siempre a Dios y la Virgen que nunca me abandonan.
    [Show full text]