DOCSLIB.ORG

Criteria Phase

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Criteria Phase Main Panel A 1 Clinical Medicine 2 Public Health, Health Services and Primary Care 3 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy 4 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience 5 Biological Sciences 6 Agriculture, Veterinary and Food Science Main Panel B 7 Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences 8 Chemistry 9 Physics 10 Mathematical Sciences 11 Computer Science and Informatics 12 Engineering Main Panel C 13 Architecture, Built Environment and Planning 14 Geography and Environmental Studies 15 Archaeology 16 Economics and Econometrics 17 Business and Management Studies 18 Law 19 Politics and International Studies 20 Social Work and Social Policy 21 Sociology 22 Anthropology and Development Studies 23 Education 24 Sport and Exercise Sciences, Leisure and Tourism Main Panel D 25 Area Studies 26 Modern Languages and Linguistics 27 English Language and Literature 28 History 29 Classics 30 Philosophy 31 Theology and Religious Studies 32 Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory 33 Music, Drama, Dance, Performing Arts, Film and Screen Studies 34 Communication, Cultural and Media Studies, Library and Information Management 1 Criteria Phase Main Panel A Chair Professor John Iredale University of Bristol Members Professor Doreen Cantrell University of Dundee Professor Peter Clegg University of Liverpool Professor David Crossman Chief Scientist Scottish Government Professor Dame Anna Dominiczak* University of Glasgow Professor Paul Elliott Imperial College London Professor Garret FitzGerald University of Pennsylvania Professor Susan Gathercole University of Cambridge Dr Jack Gauldie McMaster University Professor Bernadette Hannigan Public Health England Professor Anthony Hickey RTI International Dr Dermot Kelleher University of British Columbia Mr Imran Khan Wellcome Trust Professor Hugh McKenna Ulster University Dr David Mela Unilever Professor Peter Morris* University of Nottingham Professor Richard Oliver Curtin University Professor Sir Nilesh Samani British Heart Foundation Dr Malcolm Skingle GlaxoSmithKline Professor Moira Whyte University of Edinburgh Observers Dr Jef Grainger BBSRC Dr Ian Viney MRC Secretariat Ms Anna Grey University of York Mrs Alison Honnor Sheffield Hallam University Dr Tony Weir Heriot-Watt University Sub-panel 1: Clinical Medicine Chair Professor Moira Whyte University of Edinburgh Deputy Chair Professor Ian Hall University of Nottingham 2 * denotes interdisciplinary member on a main panel, and interdisciplinary adviser on a sub-panel Members Professor David Adams University of Birmingham Professor Metin Avkiran British Heart Foundation Professor Cyrus Cooper* University of Southampton Professor Helen Cross University College London Professor Chris Griffiths University of Manchester Professor Paul Morgan Cardiff University Professor Jane Norman University of Edinburgh Professor Munir Pirmohamed University of Liverpool Professor Brian Walker Newcastle University Professor Hugh Watkins University of Oxford Professor Jonathan Weber Imperial College London Secretariat Dr Nana Shimosako Wellcome Trust Additional assessment phase members Professor Mark Caulfield Queen Mary, University of London Professor Diana Eccles University of Southampton Professor Fiona Gilbert University of Cambridge Professor Gerard Graham University of Glasgow Professor Mark Hull University of Leeds Professor David Jones Newcastle University Professor David Menon University of Cambridge Professor Paul Moss Birmingham University Professor Stephen Renshaw Sheffield University Professor Manuel Salto-Tellez Queen's University Belfast Professor Gavin Screaton University of Oxford Professor Aziz Sheikh University of Edinburgh Professor Frank Sullivan University of St Andrews Professor Maria Zambon Public Health England Sub-panel 2: Public Health, Health Services and Primary care Chair Professor Paul Elliott Imperial College London Deputy Chair Professor Frank Kee* Queen's University Belfast Members Professor Harry Campbell University of Edinburgh Professor Marion Campbell University of Aberdeen Mr Simon Denegri National Institute for Health Research Professor Trish Greenhalgh University of Oxford Professor Kate Hunt University of Stirling Professor Paul Little University of Southampton 3 * denotes interdisciplinary member on a main panel, and interdisciplinary adviser on a sub-panel Professor Tim Peters University of Bristol Sub-panel 2 Secretariat Ms Jo Lakey Brunel University London Additional assessment phase members Professor Deborah Ashby Imperial College London Professor Tony Avery University of Nottingham Professor Douglas Easton University of Cambridge Professor Alan Silman University of Oxford Professor Paula Williamson University of Liverpool Professor Olivia Wu University of Glasgow Sub-panel 3: Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy Chair Professor Hugh McKenna Ulster University Deputy Chair Professor Yvonne Barnett* Nottingham Trent University Members Professor Richard Aspinall Rivock Ltd Professor Karen Bryan University of Greenwich Professor Dame Jessica Corner University of Nottingham Professor Priscilla Harries Brunel University London Professor Doreen McClurg Glasgow Caledonian University Professor Afzal Mohammed Aston University Professor Christopher Nester University of Salford Professor Angus Walls University of Edinburgh Professor David Whitaker Cardiff University Dr Julie Woodley University of the West of England Secretariat Dr Andrew Taylor University of Hull Additional assessment phase members Professor Joanna Adams University of Southampton Professor Zeeshan Ahmad De Montfort University Professor Aedin Cassidy University of East Anglia Professor Mary Chambers Kingston University Professor Charlotte Clarke University of Edinburgh Dr Simon Hackett Tyne & Wear NHS Trust Professor Sue Higham University of Liverpool Professor Carmel Hughes Queen's University Belfast Professor Simon Jackson University of Plymouth Professor Julie Jomeen University of Hull Professor Sallie Lamb* University of Oxford 4 * denotes interdisciplinary member on a main panel, and interdisciplinary adviser on a sub-panel Professor Jayne Lawrence University of Manchester Professor Simon Mackay University of Strathclyde Professor Jill Macleod Clarke University of Southampton Professor Lorna MacPherson University of Glasgow Professor Kader Parahoo* Ulster University Professor Nigel Pitts King's College London Dr Karen Roberts Macmillan Cancer Support Professor Jo Rycroft-Malone Bangor University Professor Julius Sim Keele University Professor Julie Taylor University of Birmingham Professor Des Tobin University of Bradford Sub-Panel 4: Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience Chair Professor Susan Gathercole University of Cambridge Deputy Chair Professor Jeremy Hall Cardiff University Members Professor Catherine Abbott University of Edinburgh Professor Roger Barker University of Cambridge Professor Richard Crisp* Durham University Professor James Deuchars University of Leeds Professor Matthew Hotopf King’s College London University of Central Lancashire and Mersey Professor Jane Ireland Care NHS Trust Professor Matthew Lambon-Ralph University of Manchester Professor Courtenay Norbury University College London Dr David Reynolds Alzheimer’s Research UK Professor Shirley Reynolds University of Reading Secretariat Dr Sophie Crouchman Loughborough University Additional assessment phase members Professor Andrew Blamire Newcastle University Professor Mike Burton University of York Professor Helen Cassaday University of Nottingham Professor Patrick Haggard University College London Professor Elizabeth Meins University of York Professor Daryl O'Connor University of Leeds Professor Kathleen Rastle Royal Holloway, University of London Professor Richard Wade-Martins University of Oxford Professor Allan Young King's College London 5 * denotes interdisciplinary member on a main panel, and interdisciplinary adviser on a sub-panel Sub-panel 5: Biological Sciences Chair Professor Doreen Cantrell University of Dundee Deputy Chair Professor Julian Dow University of Glasgow Members Professor Leo Brady* University of Bristol Professor Susan Brain King’s College London Professor Francesca Buffa* University of Oxford Dr Natalie Carter Arthritis Research UK Professor Neil Gow* University of Aberdeen Professor Pat Heslop-Harrison* University of Leicester Professor David Hosken* University of Exeter Professor Tracy Hussell University of Manchester Secretariat Miss Victoria Macfarlane Keele University Additional assessment phase members Professor Judith Allen University of Manchester Professor Dorothy Bennett St George's, University of London Professor Philip Biggin University of Oxford Professor Dominique Bonnet The Francis Crick Institute Professor Paula Booth King’s College London Professor ad Dafforn University of Birmingham Professor Kevin Fox Cardiff University Professor Mark Harris University of Leeds Professor Ian Henderson University of Birmingham Prof Graeme Milligan University of Glasgow Professor Stefan Pryzborski University of Durham Professor Sonia Rocha University of Liverpool Professor Gail Taylor University of Southampton and University of Califo Sub-panel 6: Agriculture, Veterinary and Food Science Chair Professor Peter Clegg University of Liverpool Deputy Chair Professor Chris Elliott Queen's University Belfast Members Professor Liz Baggs University of Edinburgh Professor Lynn Frewer* Newcastle University 6 * denotes interdisciplinary member on a main panel, and interdisciplinary adviser on a sub-panel Professor
Recommended publications
  • The National Association of Baptist Professors of Religion

    The National Association of Baptist Professors of Religion

    College Theology Society The Human in a Dehumanizing World: Re-Examining Theological Anthropology and Its Implications Sixty-Seventh Annual Convention in conjunction with The National Association of Baptist Professors of Religion Thursday, June 3 – Saturday, June 5, 2021 **ALL TIMES CENTRAL** Thursday Evening Opening 6:00-6:45pm (CDT) Online Auditorium Welcome, Business Meeting, Award Presentations Mary Doak University of San Diego (CA) President, College Theology Society Thursday Plenary 7:00-8:30pm (CDT) Online Auditorium ID: Convention Co-Chair and Session Moderator Jessica Coblentz, Saint Mary’s College (IN) Love for the Annihilated: A Black Theological Reading of Angela’s Memorial Memorial Andrew L. Prevot Boston College Andrew L. Prevot is an associate professor in the Department of Theology at Boston College. His research interests include: prayer, spirituality, and mystical theology; political, liberation, and black theology; phenomenology and continental philosophy of religion; and Catholic systematic and fundamental theology. He is the author of Thinking Prayer: Theology and Spirituality Amid the Crises of Modernity (Notre Dame Press, 2015), and a number of article and book chapters in the fields of liberation theology, political theology, and philosophical theology. Dr Prevot’s address belongs to a burgeoning field of scholarship that addresses current social issues by drawing on Christian mystical sources. In particular, it argues that Angela of Foligno's struggle with an inner sense of personal nothingness resembles the psychological burdens of many suffering under anti-blackness and other dehumanizing regimes. It further contends that God's loving response to Angela points to the sort of love that is needed to address such injustices.
  • Letter: Leprosy and Paleopathology – Exchange of Experience Correspondência: Lepra E Paleopatologia – Intercâmbio De Experiências Patrícia DEPS1

    Letter: Leprosy and Paleopathology – Exchange of Experience Correspondência: Lepra E Paleopatologia – Intercâmbio De Experiências Patrícia DEPS1

    Letter: Leprosy and Paleopathology – exchange of experience Correspondência: Lepra e Paleopatologia – intercâmbio de experiências Patrícia DEPS1 RECEBIDO: 25.02.2016 APROVADO: 20.03.2016 *** Background I was a medical student in 1990 when I visited the Alzira Bley Educational Establishment while training in pediatrics. At that time, I was able to visit the nearby Colony Hospital Doctor Pedro Fontes, where leprosy patients were segregated from around 1937 to 1979. Since then I have returned to the Colony Hospital many times looking for answers about that enigmatic, infectious disease called leprosy. The patients considered themselves ex- leprosy patients because they were treated according to the WHO recommendations and were theoretically “bacilli free”. However, many of the patients told me their stories and this uncovered a wealth of information about how their leprosy was diagnosed and treated, as well as giving me an understanding of their lives and their expectations for the future. It was these visits to the Colony Hospital that first sparked my interest in leprosy and my interest continued to grow following my graduation. So much so that I have now spent more than two decades studying this fascinating and amazing topic. I graduated in medicine in 1993 at the Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), in Vitória (Brazil), then moved to São Paulo for training in 1 Patrícia D. Deps. Departamento de Medicina Social, Grupo de Estudos de Arqueologia, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória-ES, Brasil. Email address: [email protected]; [email protected] 131 ANGOTTI NETO, Hélio (org.). Mirabilia Medicinæ 6 (2016/1). Medical Education Educação Médica Educación Médica Jan-Jun 2016/ISSN 1676-5818 Dermatology at São Paulo Hospital/ University Federal de São Paulo.
  • Christian Theology Edited by Ian A

    Christian Theology Edited by Ian A

    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-41496-9 - The Cambridge Dictionary of Christian Theology Edited by Ian A. McFarland, David A. S. Fergusson, Karen Kilby, Iain R. Torrance Frontmatter More information the cambridge dictionary of Christian Theology With over 550 entries ranging from ‘Abba’ to ‘Zwingli’ composed by leading contemporary theologians from around the world, The Cambridge Dictionary of Christian Theology represents a fresh, ecumenical approach to theological refer- ence. Written with an emphasis on clarity and concision, all entries are designed to help the reader understand and assess the specifically theological significance of the most important concepts. Clearly structured, the volume is organized around a small number of ‘core entries’ which focus on key topics to provide a general overview of major subject areas, while making use of related shorter entries to impart a more detailed knowledge of technical terms. The work as a whole provides an introduction to the defining topics in Christian thought and is an essential reference point for students and scholars. ian a. mcfarland is Associate Professor of Systematic Theology at Emory University. His publications include Difference and Identity: A Theological Anthro- pology (2001) and The Divine Image: Envisioning the Invisible God (2005). davida.s.fergussonis Professor of Divinity and Principal of New College at the University of Edinburgh. His recent publications include Church, State and Civil Society (Cambridge, 2004) and Faith and Its Critics (2009). karen kilby is Head of the Department of Theology and Religious Studies at the University of Nottingham and President of the Catholic Theological Associ- ation of Great Britain. She is the author of A Brief Introduction to Karl Rahner (2007) and Karl Rahner: Theology and Philosophy (2004).
  • Karl Barth and Hans Urs Von Balthasar: a Critical Engagement

    Karl Barth and Hans Urs Von Balthasar: a Critical Engagement

    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by University of Birmingham Research Archive, E-theses Repository KARL BARTH AND HANS URS VON BALTHASAR: A CRITICAL ENGAGEMENT by STEPHEN DAVID WIGLEY A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Theology and Religion School of Historical Studies The University of Birmingham January 2006 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Karl Barth and Hans Urs von Balthasar: a critical engagement Abstract This thesis examines the relationship between two major twentieth century theologians, Karl Barth and Hans Urs von Balthasar. It seeks to show how their meeting, resulting in von Balthasar’s seminal study The Theology of Karl Barth, goes on to influence von Balthasar’s theological development throughout his trilogy beginning with The Glory of the Lord, continuing in the Theo-Drama and concluding with the Theo-Logic. In particular it explores the significance of the debate over the ‘analogy of being’ and seeks to show that von Balthasar’s decision to structure his trilogy around the transcendentals of ‘being’, the beautiful, the good and the true, results from his re-affirmation of the role of analogy in light of his debate with Barth.
  • Wolfson Research Institute for Health and Wellbeing Here at Durham University

    Wolfson Research Institute for Health and Wellbeing Here at Durham University

    Wolfson Research Institute for Health and Wellbeing Annual Report 2019 Meet the Wolfson Team ................................................................................................ 4 Professor Amanda Ellison .......................................................................................... 4 Mrs Suzanne Boyd...................................................................................................... 4 Special Interest Groups .................................................................................................. 5 Teesside Aneurysm Group ......................................................................................... 5 Smoking Special Interest Group ................................................................................. 6 Pain SIG Report – Chronic pain: now and the future ................................................. 8 Physical Activity Special Interest Group .................................................................. 10 Stroke Special Interest Group .................................................................................. 13 Reports from Centres and Units .................................................................................. 14 Centre for the History of Medicine and Disease (CHMD) ........................................ 14 The Durham Infancy and Sleep Centre .................................................................... 15 Centre for Death and Life Studies ............................................................................ 17 Centre
  • Forensic Anthropology & Archaeology News & Updates

    Forensic Anthropology & Archaeology News & Updates

    Issue 4 July — December 2016 Forensic Anthropology & Archaeology Student Newsletter Communications in Australia & New Zealand News & Updates News & Updates Publications The Professionalisation of Forensic Anthropology in Australia – A Brief Overview Thesis Research By Dr Soren Blau Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine ([email protected]) Achievements Over the past 30 years there has been meeting was to bring together & Awards increasing interest in the discipline of practitioners from Australia and New forensic anthropology in Australia Zealand to discuss current techniques, (Donlon 2008; Donlon 2016). Despite limitations and ways to improve Field School this interest, there is confusion about domestic casework practice and Opportunities the qualifications and experience required to gain the title “forensic anthropologist” and practise as an Osteology Quiz expert in the field. The aim of this contribution is to disseminate to the student community details about the Forthcoming Forensic Anthropology Scientific Conferences Working Group (FS SWG), which is the professional body of forensic anthropology practitioners endorsed Editors by the National Institute of Forensic Science (NIFS). Ms Samantha Rowbotham In 2006 The Centre for Human Identification (CHI) at the Victorian PhD Candidate, Monash University information communication. This Institute of Forensic Medicine (VIFM) cross disciplinary symposium formed hosted a two day symposium for Dr Soren Blau the basis for the development of the forensic anthropologists, forensic Forensic Anthropologist, Victorian Medical Sciences Specialist Advisory Institute of Forensic Medicine odontologists and forensic Group (MS SAG). entomologists. The aim of this Forensic Anthropology & Archaeology Student Newsletter Specialist Advisory Groups The Chair of the MS SAG is current techniques (SAGs) were established under the elected by the group and holds the and their auspices of the Senior Managers of position for no more than four years.
  • Scottish Journal Of

    Scottish Journal Of

    scottish journal of Volume 72 Number 3 2019 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.33.22, on 29 Sep 2021 at 08:53:54, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0036930619000565 Editor Ian A. McFarland Emory University, Atlanta, GA Email: [email protected] Editorial Assistant E. S. Kempson University of Cambridge, UK Consulting Editors James Edwards Francesca Murphy Whitworth University, Spokane, Washington, USA University of Notre Dame, USA David Fergusson Aristotle Papanikolaou University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK Fordham University, USA David Ford Amy Plantinga Pauw University of Cambridge, UK Louisville Presbyterian Theological Seminary, Stanley Hauerwas Louisville, Kentucky, USA Duke Divinity School, USA Willie Jennings Kang Phee Seng Yale Divinity School, USA China Graduate School of Theology, Hong Kong Paul Joyce Katherine Sonderegger King’s College, London, UK Virginia Theological Seminary, USA Karen Kilby Kathryn Tanner Durham University, UK Yale Divinity School, Yale, USA Lois Malcolm Leanne Van Dyk Luther Seminary, St Paul, USA Columbia Theological Seminary, USA Joseph Mangina Wycliffe College, Toronto, Canada Dawn DeVries Bruce L. McCormack Union Theological Seminary, Richmond, Princeton Theological Seminary, New Jersey, USA Virginia, USA Paul Molnar Michael Weinrich St John’s University, Queens, New York, USA University of Bochum, Germany Subscriptions Scottish Journal of Theology (ISSN 0036-9306; electronic ISSN
  • Karl Rahner Theology and Philosophy

    Karl Rahner Theology and Philosophy

    Karl Rahner Theology and philosophy Karl Rahner is one of the great theologians of the twentieth century. This bold and original book explores the relationship between his theology and his philosophy, and argues for the possibility of a nonfoundationalist reading of Rahner. Karen Kilby calls into question both the admiration of Rahner’s disciples for the overarching unity of his thought, and the too- easy dismissals of critics who object to his ‘flawed philosophical starting point’ or to his supposedly modern and liberal appeal to experience. Through a lucid and critical exposition of key texts including Spirit in the World and Hearer of the Word, and of themes such as the Vorgriff auf esse, the supernatural existential, and the anonymous Christian, Karen Kilby reaffirms Rahner’s significance for modern theology and offers a clear expo- sition of his thought. Karen Kilby is Lecturer in Systematic Theology at Nottingham University. She is author of Karl Rahner (Fount Christian Thinkers, 1997), a brief intro- duction to the thought of Rahner. Karl Rahner Theology and philosophy Karen Kilby First published 2004 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor and Francis e-Library, 2005. “To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk.” © 2004 Karen Kilby All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
  • Guidelines to the Standards for Recording Human Remains

    Guidelines to the Standards for Recording Human Remains

    Guidelines to the Standards for Recording Human Remains IFA Paper No. 7 Editors: Megan Brickley and Jacqueline I McKinley Guidelines to the Standards for Recording Human Remains Published 2004 by BABAO, Department of Archaeology, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BF and the Institute of Field Archaeologists, SHES, University of Reading, Whiteknights, PO Box 227, Reading RG6 6AB ISBN 0948 393 88 2 Copyright © BABAO, IFA and individual authors Editors: Megan Brickley and Jacqueline I McKinley Contributors: Anthea Boylston, Megan Brickley, Don Brothwell, Brian Connell, Simon Mays, Jacqueline I McKinley, Linda O’Connell, Mike Richards, Charlotte Roberts, Sonia Zakrzewski Acknowledgements Thanks are due to all those who assisted in this publication by reading and making comments on various parts of the document including Andrew Millard, Natasha Powers, James Steele and Bill White, and also contributors who commented on colleagues contributions. Thanks to Professor Sue Black for providing Appendix 1. Thanks are also due to various individuals and organisations for permission to print figures from their sites/reports; Rachel Ives for Figure 1, Wessex Archaeology for Figure 5, Roger Mercer and the Hambledon Hill Project for Figure 7, Dr Kay Prag for Figure 16 and Dr Ingrid Mainland for Figure 17. BRITISH ASSOCIATION FOR BIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY AND OSTEOARCHAEOLOGY INSTITUTE OF FIELD ARCHAEOLOGISTS 1 Guidelines to the Standards for Recording Human Remains INSTITUTE OF FIELD ARCHAEOLOGISTS PAPER NO. 7 Editors: Megan Brickley
  • Durham Research Online

    Durham Research Online

    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 15 March 2019 Version of attached le: Accepted Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Murray, Paul D. (2018) 'Living Catholicity dierently : on growing into the plenitudinous plurality of Catholic Communion in God.', in Envisioning futures for the Catholic Church. Washington, D.C.: Council for Research in Values and Philosophy, pp. 109-158. Cultural heritage and contemporary change series., Christian philosophical studies 23 (VIII). Further information on publisher's website: http://www.crvp.org/publications/Series-VIII/23-Futures.pdf Publisher's copyright statement: Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk Living Catholicity differently: On growing into the plenitudinous Plurality of Catholic Communion in God1 PAUL D. MURRAY Introduction The forerunner to the current volume, A Catholic Minority Church in a World of Seekers (2015), analysed the contemporary situation of the Catholic Church in North America and Europe as one minority choice amidst a welter of options.
  • As a Mother Tenderly

    As a Mother Tenderly

    AS A MOTHER TENDERLY Exploring parish ministry through the metaphor and analogy of mothering REVEREND EMMA PERCY MA Cantab BA Dunelm Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2012 As a mother tenderly: using mothering as a metaphor and analogy for parish ministry. The thesis sets out to use maternal imagery as a way of articulating the practice of parish ministry in the Church of England. The aim is to find a language which can affirm and encourage many aspects of good practice that are in danger of being over looked because they are neither well articulated nor valued. The ministry of a parish priest is a relational activity: characterised by care. It is because the priest has a responsibility to care for those entrusted to her that she engages in priestly activity. In doing so she is sharing in the collective ministry of the church in which she has a pivotal and public role. The church is to be a community in which people grow up in Christ and come to maturity of faith. In order to explore the relational activity of a parish priest the imagery of mothering is used. The changing place of women in society has made it more difficult to use gendered images and thus it is necessary to discuss whether mothering is an essentially female activity. After acknowledging the complexity of the gendered language and the reality that most women arrive at mothering through a specifically female bodily experience, the thesis goes on to state that the practice of mothering is not instinctual but learnt.
  • Some Aspects of the Theological Legacy of Karl Rahner

    Some Aspects of the Theological Legacy of Karl Rahner

    Declan Marmion Some Aspects of the Theological Legacy of Karl Rahner Introduction The German termvielseitig – versatile or many-sided – certainly applies to Karl Rahner. The word might be literally translated as ‘many-paged’, and this epithet too applies to Rahner, as many theology students can attest. His literary output was prodigious – even by 1974 it had reached almost 3,000 publications, including translations. A distinguished Irish theologian once said of him that in all his voluminous works, Rahner has really only one thing to say – but it is maddeningly difficult to name what that one thing is! Were I to venture a guess, I would point to Rahner’s repeated attempts to focus on the core of the Christian faith, a method that does not lead to a reduction of the essentials but, in the words of Herbert Vorgrimler, to ‘a concentration of the plurality into a few very basic thoughts,’ key terms (Schlüsselbegriffe), or better, key experiences (Schlüsselerlebnisse), of which the most fundamental is the experience of the self-communication of God.1 However, in this essay I will not focus on the experience of God in Rahner, though hopefully it will be apparent how Rahner’s ‘mystagogical’ style finds 1 ‘Seine [Rahner’s] Methode … ist die der Konzentration der Vielfalt auf ganz wenige Grundgedanken, wie er sagt, auf Schlüsselbegriffe oder noch besser auf Schlüsselerlebnisse. Der Grundgedanke dieser Theologie oderdas Schlüsselerlebnis ist, nachlesbar bei Rahner selber, die Erfahrung Gottes.’ Herbert Vorgrimler, ‘Gotteserfahrung im Alltag: Der Beitrag Karl Rahners zu Spiritualität und Mystik,’ in Albert Raffelt, ed., Karl Rahner in Erinnerung, Freiburger Akademieschriften, Band 8.