DOCSLIB.ORG

Natural Resource Condition Assessment, Pipestone National

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Natural Resource Condition Assessment, Pipestone National National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Pipestone National Monument Natural Resource Condition Assessment Natural Resource Report NPS/PIPE/NRR—2016/1106 ON THE COVER Active pipestone quarry surrounded by prairie, Pipestone National Monument Photograph by Dave Jones, Colorado State University Pipestone National Monument Natural Resource Condition Assessment Natural Resource Report NPS/PIPE/NRR—2016/1106 David S. Jones1, Roy Cook1, John Sovell2, Christopher Herron1, Jay Benner1, Karin Decker2, Steven Sherman1, Andrew Beavers1, Johannes Beebee3, and David Weinzimmer1 1Colorado State University CEMML – Department 1490 Warner College of Natural Resources Fort Collins, CO 80523-1490 2 Colorado State University Colorado Natural Heritage Program Department of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Biology Warner College of Natural Resources Fort Collins, CO 80523 3 Colorado State University Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering Fort Collins, CO 80523 January 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service. The series supports the advancement of science, informed decision-making, and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series also provides a forum for presenting more lengthy results that may not be accepted by publications with page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received formal peer review by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data, and whose background and expertise put them on par technically and scientifically with the authors of the information. Views, statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations, and data in this report do not necessarily reflect views and policies of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U.S. Government. This report is available from the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring Network website (http://science.nature.nps.gov/im/units/htln/) and the Natural Resource Publications Management website (http://www.nature.nps.gov/publications/nrpm/). To receive this report in a format optimized for screen readers, please email [email protected]. Please cite this publication as: Jones, D. S., R. Cook, J. Sovell, C. Herron, J. Benner, K. Decker, S. Sherman, A. Beavers, J. Beebee and D. Weinzimmer. 2015. Pipestone National Monument natural resource condition assessment. Natural Resource Report NPS/PIPE/NRR—2016/1106. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. NPS 372/131038, January 2016 ii Contents Page Figures................................................................................................................................................... xi Tables .................................................................................................................................................. xix Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................... xxv 1. NRCA Background Information .................................................................................................... 1 2. Introduction and Resource Setting ................................................................................................. 5 2.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 5 2.1.1. Enabling Legislation/Presidential Proclamation ................................................... 5 2.1.2. Geographic Setting ............................................................................................... 6 2.1.3. Monument Significance ........................................................................................ 6 2.1.4. Ethnographic Resources and Cultural Use ........................................................... 9 2.1.5. Park History ........................................................................................................ 11 2.1.6. Visitation Statistics ............................................................................................. 12 2.2. Natural Resources ............................................................................................................ 14 2.2.1. Climate ................................................................................................................ 14 2.2.2. Geology and Soils ............................................................................................... 14 2.2.3. Hydrology ........................................................................................................... 15 2.2.4. Air Quality .......................................................................................................... 15 2.2.5. Land Use ............................................................................................................. 15 2.2.6. Wildlife ............................................................................................................... 16 2.2.7. Vegetation ........................................................................................................... 16 2.3. Resource Stewardship ...................................................................................................... 17 2.3.1. Management Directives and Planning Guidance ................................................ 17 2.3.2. Overview of Resource Management Concerns .................................................. 19 2.3.3. Status of Supporting Science .............................................................................. 21 2.4. Literature Cited ................................................................................................................ 22 3. Study Scoping and Design............................................................................................................ 25 3.1. Preliminary Scoping ......................................................................................................... 25 3.2. Study Design .................................................................................................................... 26 iii Contents (continued) Page 3.2.1. Indicator Framework, Focal Resources and Indicators ...................................... 26 3.2.2. Reporting Areas .................................................................................................. 26 3.2.3. General Approach and Methods ......................................................................... 29 3.3. Literature Cited ................................................................................................................ 35 4. Natural Resource Conditions ........................................................................................................ 37 4.1. Chapter 4 Contents ........................................................................................................... 37 4.2. Land Cover and Land Use ............................................................................................... 38 4.2.1. Background and Importance ............................................................................... 38 4.2.2. Data and Methods ............................................................................................... 39 4.2.3. Condition and Trend ........................................................................................... 43 4.2.4. Uncertainty and Data Gaps ................................................................................. 61 4.2.5. Sources of Expertise ........................................................................................... 63 4.2.6. Literature Cited ................................................................................................... 63 4.3. Night Sky ......................................................................................................................... 66 4.3.1. Background and Importance ............................................................................... 66 4.3.2. Data and Methods ............................................................................................... 67 4.3.3. Reference Conditions ......................................................................................... 68 4.3.4. Condition and Trend ........................................................................................... 68 4.3.5. Uncertainty and Data Gaps ................................................................................. 69 4.3.6. Sources of Expertise ..........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey for Special-Status Vascular Plant Species
    SURVEY FOR SPECIAL-STATUS VASCULAR PLANT SPECIES For the proposed Eagle Canyon Fish Passage Project Tehama and Shasta Counties, California Prepared for: Tehama Environmental Solutions 910 Main Street, Suite D Red Bluff, California 96080 Prepared by: Dittes & Guardino Consulting P.O. Box 6 Los Molinos, California 96055 (530) 384-1774 [email protected] Eagle Canyon Fish Passage Improvement Project - Botany Report Sept. 12, 2018 Prepared by: Dittes & Guardino Consulting 1 SURVEY FOR SPECIAL-STATUS VASCULAR PLANT SPECIES Eagle Canyon Fish Passage Project Shasta & Tehama Counties, California T30N, R1W, SE 1/4 Sec. 25, SE1/4 Sec. 24, NE ¼ Sec. 36 of the Shingletown 7.5’ USGS Topographic Quadrangle TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 4 II. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 III. Project Description ............................................................................................................................................... 4 IV. Location .................................................................................................................................................................. 5 V. Methods ..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts
    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory,
    [Show full text]
  • Stace Edition 4: Changes
    STACE EDITION 4: CHANGES NOTES Changes to the textual content of keys and species accounts are not covered. "Mention" implies that the taxon is or was given summary treatment at the head of a family, family division or genus (just after the key if there is one). "Reference" implies that the taxon is or was given summary treatment inline in the accounts for a genus. "Account" implies that the taxon is or was given a numbered account inline in the numbered treatments within a genus. "Key" means key at species / infraspecific level unless otherwise qualified. "Added" against an account, mention or reference implies that no treatment was given in Edition 3. "Given" against an account, mention or reference implies that this replaces a less full or prominent treatment in Stace 3. “Reduced to” against an account or reference implies that this replaces a fuller or more prominent treatment in Stace 3. GENERAL Family order changed in the Malpighiales Family order changed in the Cornales Order Boraginales introduced, with families Hydrophyllaceae and Boraginaceae Family order changed in the Lamiales BY FAMILY 1 LYCOPODIACEAE 4 DIPHASIASTRUM Key added. D. complanatum => D. x issleri D. tristachyum keyed and account added. 5 EQUISETACEAE 1 EQUISETUM Key expanded. E. x meridionale added to key and given account. 7 HYMENOPHYLLACEAE 1 HYMENOPHYLLUM H. x scopulorum given reference. 11 DENNSTAEDTIACEAE 2 HYPOLEPIS added. Genus account added. Issue 7: 26 December 2019 Page 1 of 35 Stace edition 4 changes H. ambigua: account added. 13 CYSTOPTERIDACEAE Takes on Gymnocarpium, Cystopteris from Woodsiaceae. 2 CYSTOPTERIS C. fragilis ssp. fragilis: account added.
    [Show full text]
  • Physiological and Molecular Basis of Salt and Waterlogging
    Comparative molecular physiology of salt and waterlogging tolerance in Lotus tenuis and L. corniculatus: towards a perennial pasture legume for saline land Natasha Lea Teakle This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Western Australia School of Plant Biology Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences June 2008 ABSTRACT Salinity and waterlogging interact to reduce the growth of most crop and pasture species. Species that are productive on saline-waterlogging land are needed for Australian farming systems. One option is Lotus tenuis, a perennial legume widely grown for pasture in the flood-prone and salt-affected Pampa region of Argentina. To identify mechanisms responsible for the adverse interaction between salinity and waterlogging, Lotus tenuis with a reputation for tolerance was compared with L. corniculatus, the most widely cultivated Lotus species. The physiology of salt and waterlogging tolerance in L. tenuis (4 cultivars) was evaluated, and compared with L. corniculatus (3 cultivars). Overall, L. tenuis cultivars accumulated less Na+ and Cl-, and more K+ in shoots than L. corniculatus cultivars, when exposed to 200 mM NaCl for 28 d in aerated or in anoxic (stagnant agar) solutions. In a NaCl dose response experiment (0 to 400 mM NaCl in aerated solution), Lotus tenuis (cv. Chaja) accumulated half as much Cl- in its shoots than L. corniculatus (cv. San Gabriel) at all external NaCl concentrations, and about 30% less shoot Na+ in treatments above 250 mM NaCl. Ion distributions in shoots were determined for plants at 200 mM NaCl; L. tenuis (cv. Chaja) accumulated about half as much Cl- in old leaves, young leaves and stems, compared with concentrations in L.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Species of Special Concern and Vascular Plant Flora of the National
    Plant Species of Special Concern and Vascular Plant Flora of the National Elk Refuge Prepared for the US Fish and Wildlife Service National Elk Refuge By Walter Fertig Wyoming Natural Diversity Database The Nature Conservancy 1604 Grand Avenue Laramie, WY 82070 February 28, 1998 Acknowledgements I would like to thank the following individuals for their assistance with this project: Jim Ozenberger, ecologist with the Jackson Ranger District of Bridger-Teton National Forest, for guiding me in his canoe on Flat Creek and for providing aerial photographs and lodging; Jennifer Whipple, Yellowstone National Park botanist, for field assistance and help with field identification of rare Carex species; Dr. David Cooper of Colorado State University, for sharing field information from his 1994 studies; Dr. Ron Hartman and Ernie Nelson of the Rocky Mountain Herbarium, for providing access to unmounted collections by Michele Potkin and others from the National Elk Refuge; Dr. Anton Reznicek of the University of Michigan, for confirming the identification of several problematic Carex specimens; Dr. Robert Dorn for confirming the identification of several vegetative Salix specimens; and lastly Bruce Smith and the staff of the National Elk Refuge for providing funding and logistical support and for allowing me free rein to roam the refuge for plants. 2 Table of Contents Page Introduction . 6 Study Area . 6 Methods . 8 Results . 10 Vascular Plant Flora of the National Elk Refuge . 10 Plant Species of Special Concern . 10 Species Summaries . 23 Aster borealis . 24 Astragalus terminalis . 26 Carex buxbaumii . 28 Carex parryana var. parryana . 30 Carex sartwellii . 32 Carex scirpoidea var. scirpiformis .
    [Show full text]
  • Application of DNA Flow Cytometry to Aid Species Delimitation in Isoetes Author(S): Jay F
    Application of DNA Flow Cytometry to Aid Species Delimitation in Isoetes Author(s): Jay F. Bolin, Carmony L. Hartwig, Peter Schafran, and Slavko Komarnytsky Source: Castanea, 83(1):38-47. Published By: Southern Appalachian Botanical Society https://doi.org/10.2179/16-120 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.2179/16-120 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/ terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. CASTANEA 83(1): 38–47. DECEMBER Copyright 2018 Southern Appalachian Botanical Society Application of DNA Flow Cytometry to Aid Species Delimitation in Isoetes Jay F. Bolin,1*CarmonyL.Hartwig,1 Peter Schafran,2 andSlavkoKomarnytsky3,4 1Department of Biology, Catawba College, Salisbury, North Carolina 28144 2Department of Biological Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia 23529 3Plants for Human Health Institute, North Carolina State University, Kannapolis, North Carolina 28081 4Department of Food, Bioprocessing, and Nutrition Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695 ABSTRACT The genus Isoetes is known for morphological convergence and a relative paucity of useful gross morphological characters for identification.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf (472.06 K)
    Scrophulariaceae in the flora of Egypt 1. Systematic revision of the indigenous taxa M. Nabil El Hadidi Amal I. Hosny Nahed El Husseini and Eman Shamso The Herbarium, Faculty of Science Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt. El-Hadidi M. N., Hosny A. I., El-Husseini N. & Shamso E., 1999. Scrophulariaceae in the flora of Egypt. 1. Systematic revision of the indigenous taxa. Taeckholmia 19(2): 227-259. The indigenous taxa of Scrophulariaceae represented in the flora of Egypt were systematically revised. This revealed the presence of 50 species belonging to 16 genera, 8 tribes and 3 sub-families. Kickxia gracilis, K. pseudoscoparia, Scrophularia sinaica, Veronica scardica and V. rubrifolia are new records to the flora of this country. For each species, valid name, synonymes (if any), type, distribution (local and global) and selected specimens are given. A key for the genera of the family, keys for species belonging to genera with more than one species; and for the infra-specific taxa of polymorphic species are provided Key words: Flora of Egypt, Scrophulariaceae, indigenous taxa, Kickxia gracilis, K. pseudoscoparia, Scrophularia sinaica, Veronica scardica, V. rubrifolia. Introduction Scrophulariaceae is a large family comprising about 292 genera and nearly 3000 species of cosmopolitan distribution; consisting mainly of herbs and few shrubs and lianas. The members of the family are generally recognized by their typically bilateral symmetric tubular flowers, ( actinomorphic in Verbascum) and their many- seeded capsular fruits. The family is of limited economic use, the best known applications are the drugs Digitalin and Digoxin extracted from species of Digitalis. Many genera are well known as garden ornamentals as species of Antirrhinum and Veronica.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Common Native & Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska
    Introduction to Common Native & Potential Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska Cover photographs by (top to bottom, left to right): Tara Chestnut/Hannah E. Anderson, Jamie Fenneman, Vanessa Morgan, Dana Visalli, Jamie Fenneman, Lynda K. Moore and Denny Lassuy. Introduction to Common Native & Potential Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska This document is based on An Aquatic Plant Identification Manual for Washington’s Freshwater Plants, which was modified with permission from the Washington State Department of Ecology, by the Center for Lakes and Reservoirs at Portland State University for Alaska Department of Fish and Game US Fish & Wildlife Service - Coastal Program US Fish & Wildlife Service - Aquatic Invasive Species Program December 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments ............................................................................ x Introduction Overview ............................................................................. xvi How to Use This Manual .................................................... xvi Categories of Special Interest Imperiled, Rare and Uncommon Aquatic Species ..................... xx Indigenous Peoples Use of Aquatic Plants .............................. xxi Invasive Aquatic Plants Impacts ................................................................................. xxi Vectors ................................................................................. xxii Prevention Tips .................................................... xxii Early Detection and Reporting
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Portulacineae Marked by Gene Tree Conflict and Gene Family Expansion Associated with Adaptation to Harsh Environments
    Supplementary Figures Evolution of Portulacineae marked by gene tree conflict and gene family expansion associated with adaptation to harsh environments Ning Wang, Email: [email protected] Stephen A. Smith, E-mail: [email protected] Dendroscope view Limeaceae_Limeum aethiopicum Montiaceae_Phemeranthus parviflorus Basellaceae_Anredera cordifolia Anacampserotaceae_Anacampseros kurtzii Portulacaceae_Portulaca amilis Cactaceae_Leuenbergeria lychnidiflora Cactaceae_Stenocereus yunckeri Cactaceae_Maihuenia poeppigii Cactaceae_Opuntia bravoana Cactaceae_Pereskia grandifolia Talinaceae_Talinum paniculatum A Didiereaceae_Portulacaria afra PhyloPlot view Limeaceae_Limeum aethiopicum Montiaceae_Phemeranthus parviflorus Basellaceae_Anredera cordifolia Anacampserotaceae_Anacampseros kurtzii 0.008 Portulacaceae_Portulaca amilis 0.992 0.118 Cactaceae_Leuenbergeria lychnidiflora Cactaceae_Stenocereus yunckeri 0.24 0.146 0.76 Cactaceae_Maihuenia poeppigii 0.854 0.882 0.364 Cactaceae_Opuntia bravoana 0.636 Cactaceae_Pereskia grandifolia B Talinaceae_Talinum paniculatum Didiereaceae_Portulacaria afra FIG. S1. The phylogenetic network inferred using MPL method in PhyloNet. Taxa were selected from each plant family based on their gene occupancy statistics. A: network visualized in Dendroscope, and B: the same network with inheritance probabilities between hybridization lineages visualized by PhyloPlot that implemented in PhyloNetworks (Solís-Lemus et al. 2017). Anacampserotaceae Basellaceae Anacampseros A. kurtzii Talinopsis frutescens Anredera cordifolia Basella alba filamentosa Bese 400 4000 4000 3000 3000 200 2000 2000 0 0 0 0 0 0.01 1.0 2.0 3.0 0.01 1.0 2.0 3.0 0.01 1.0 2.0 3.0 0.01 1.0 2.0 3.0 0.01 1.0 2.0 3.0 Portulacaceae Portulaca amilis P. cryptopetala P. grandiflora P. molokiniensis P. oleracea P. pilosa 300 500 800 800 200 200 300 150 400 400 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.01 1.0 2.0 3.0 0.01 1.0 2.0 3.0 0.01 1.0 2.0 3.0 0.01 1.0 2.0 3.0 0.01 1.0 2.0 3.0 0.01 1.0 2.0 3.0 Talinaceae P.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 9-17-2018 Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park" (2018). Botanical Studies. 85. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/85 This Flora of Northwest California-Checklists of Local Sites is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A CHECKLIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF THE REDWOOD NATIONAL & STATE PARKS James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State Univerity Arcata, California 14 September 2018 The Redwood National and State Parks are located in Del Norte and Humboldt counties in coastal northwestern California. The national park was F E R N S established in 1968. In 1994, a cooperative agreement with the California Department of Parks and Recreation added Del Norte Coast, Prairie Creek, Athyriaceae – Lady Fern Family and Jedediah Smith Redwoods state parks to form a single administrative Athyrium filix-femina var. cyclosporum • northwestern lady fern unit. Together they comprise about 133,000 acres (540 km2), including 37 miles of coast line. Almost half of the remaining old growth redwood forests Blechnaceae – Deer Fern Family are protected in these four parks.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of Isoetes
    BIBLIOGRAPHY OF ISOETES ALLEN, B.M. 1975. A note on the distribution of Isoetes in the Cadiz Province, Spain. Fern Gaz. (U.K.) 11 (2-3): 163-164 (1975). ALONSO, PAZ, E. 1989. Notas sobre plantas nuevas o interesantes para la flora Uruguaya: 1. (Notes on new or interesting plants for the Uruguayan flora: 1.) Comun. Bot. Mus. Hist. Nat. Montevideo 5 (91): 1-4 (1989) - Isoetes pp.2-3 ALSTON, A.H.G. 1982. Isoetaceae: 1. In Steenis, C.G.G.J. van, Holttum, R. E., eds. Flora Malesiana, series 2. Pteridophytes, volume 1. The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff, Dr. W. Junk Publ. 62-64 (1982)- illus., chrom. nos., key. ANDREIS, C., RODONDI, G. 1987. Alcune stazioni di Isoetes echinospora Dur. nel Bresciano e osservazioni al SEM delle spore delle Isoetes della flora Italica. Natura Bresciana no.23: 119-130 (1986 publ. 1987) - illus., maps. 4, ANTHONY, N.C., & E.A. SCHELPE, 1985. Two new taxa and a new combination in southern African Pteridophyta. Bothalia, 15 (3 & 4): 554-555 (1985) ARREGUIN-SANCHEZ, M., 1986. Nuevos registros y taxa interesantes de pteridofitas del Valle de Mexico. (Isoetaceae, Psilotaceae y Selaginellaceae) Phytologia 59 (7): 451-453 (1986) ASH, S., & K.B. PIGG. 1991. A new Jurassic Isoetites (Isoetales) from the Wallowa Terrane in Hells Canyon Oregon and Idaho. Amer. J. Bot. 78: 1636-1642. BAJPAI, U., & H.K. MAHESHWARI,1985. EM studies on the megaspores of Isoetes coromandelina. Phytomorphology, 34 (1-4): 226-231 (1984 publ. 1985) - illus. BALDWIN, W.K.W. 1933. The organization of the young sporophyte of Isoetes engelmanni, A.
    [Show full text]