Equal Rights Amendment Ratification in Indiana

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Equal Rights Amendment Ratification in Indiana 1 EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT RATIFICATION IN INDIANA: TOO LITTLE . TOO LATE . By By Beth Van Vorst Gray 1998 2 FOREWORD, 2018—AN UPDATE Maybe Not too Late After All! Although Indiana was the last state to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) before the artificial deadline set by a House committee for its ratification, the amendment to give women equal status in the Constitution has not gone away; it is very much alive and well. Ratification by Nevada in March, 2017 and by Illinois in May, 2018 are the results of consistent and persistent work towards the goal of passage by many organizations and count as the 36th and 37th state to do so. So, in theory, we are just one state away from ratification. One of James Madison’s amendments continued to work its way through the states more than 200 years after congressional approval. In May 1992, Michigan became the 38th state to ratify, making it the 27th Amendment, which says that salary increases for members of Congress do not go into effect until the term after they were approved. So, supporters of the ERA are questioning the validity of the deadline (the only proposed amendment to carry such a restriction) and . and pushing for more states to ratify it. The deadline has been challenged in court (mentioned in a footnote in the original text of this article, 1998), and, of course, in sustained lobbying efforts for ratification if 38 states. Upon one more state ratification, expect fireworks, more legal challenges, and intense lobbying on the legitimacy of the deadline and the passage of the ERA. Following is an excerpt from the Alice Paul Institute’s webpage, published in June, 2018 that states the present status clearly (www.equalrightsamendment.org). “The ERA in the States. The Equal Rights Amendment was passed by Congress on March 22, 1972 and sent to the states for ratification. In order to be added to the Constitution, it needed approval by legislatures in three-fourths (38) of the 50 states. By 1977, the legislatures of 35 states had approved the amendment. In 1978, Congress voted to extend the original March 1979 deadline to June 30, 1982. However, no additional states voted yes before that date, and the ERA fell three states short of ratification. The 15 states that did not ratify the Equal Rights Amendment before the 1982 deadline were Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah, and Virginia. Since formulation of the "three-state strategy" for ratification in 1994, ERA bills have been introduced in subsequent years in one or more legislative sessions in twelve of the unratified states (Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Illinois, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Utah, and Virginia).” 3 Between 1995 and 2016, ERA ratification bills were released from committee in some states and were passed by one but not both houses of the legislature in two of them. In Illinois, the House but not the Senate passed an ERA ratification bill in 2003, while the Senate but not the House did so in 2014. In five of the six years between 2011 and 2016, the Virginia Senate passed a resolution ratifying the Equal Rights Amendment, but the House of Delegates never released a companion bill from committee for a full vote on the House floor. On March 22, 2017, 45 years to the day after Congress passed the ERA, Nevada became the 36th state to ratify it. On May 30, 2018, Illinois became the 37th state. ERA bills have also been introduced in the legislatures of Arizona, Florida, North Carolina, Utah, and Virginia.” Permission to use with credit to www.equalrightsamendment.org 4 FOREWORD, 1998 The Indiana State Senate, on January 18, 1977, adopted HJR 2, a joint resolution approved by the House of Representatives in like form on January 12. With that final action, the 100th Indiana General Assembly ratified the “Equal Rights Amendment” (ERA) after five years of discussion and debate on the local and national scene, and extensive, emotional lobbying by both pro- and anti- ERA forces in Indiana. Indiana was the 35th and last state to ratify out of the thirty-eight states needed to make it the 28th amendment to the United States Constitution. And I was there. Elected in 1970 to the position of Principal Secretary of the Indiana State Senate by the Republican caucus, I remained in that post until August 1976. From January 1973, when the ERA was introduced for the first time in Indiana, until 1976 I had a window on the action. Literally. When in session, my post was in the “well,” a half- circle desk below the podium of the presiding officer; in the remodeled Senate of 1974, my office faced floor-to-ceiling walnut-paned windows which opened on an uninterrupted view of the floor of the Senate. When the General Assembly is in session, the entire statehouse echoes with the dueling loudspeakers of the House and Senate; but I had a front row seat to the action as well. It was, at times, an uncomfortable seat because I was an ERA advocate although I was elected by and reported to the Senate Republican Caucus, generally considered the road block to Indiana’s ratification of the ERA and firmly in control of conservative senators. Under the Standing Rules of the Senate, the majority caucus is responsible for administration of the chambers and elects the Principal Secretary to carry out those duties. The 97th General Assembly (1971-1972) was the first authorized by referendum in the 1970 general election to meet annually. New ground was being broken, precedents set for year-round staffing and professionalism, and systems were being established to provide information available through the Principal Secretary’s office to all members of the Senate and the public. The new Indiana Code was introduced and enacted, and computer technology came on the scene. It was front- page news when we brought a huge Xerox photocopier into a room adjacent to the Senate floor. Prior to 1970, the entire House and Senate, staff and members, were dependent on one sole copier in the legislative support agency that, at that time, closed at 5 pm. Senator Phillip E. Gutman (R., Fort Wayne), President pro tempore of the Senate, to whom I reported, made it very clear that the political life of the Senate was the domain of the Senators; the administrative support system was my responsibility as the Principal Secretary. As an individual citizen outside the State House, however, I was free to express myself at will. My visible support of ratification of the ERA was, however, unpopular with some members of the caucus that elected me in 1970 and twice more – in 1972 and 1974. Although new to the workforce, I realized that women needed the tools to provide for their own and their children’s well-being, especially when the traditional customs and responsibilities of marriage break down; a new generation of young women was 5 entering the workplace fully prepared to be there, but without the same rights of the young men. Women were not issued credit in their own name and equality in pay, still not in balance, was a real joke in the early ‘70s. Harassment and other kinds of discrimination were commonplace and it seemed that no one, except the powerless women who were being discriminated against, even noticed. 6 EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT RATIFICATION IN INDIANA: TOO LITTLE . TOO LATE . By Beth Van Vorst Gray Congressional Action . And Inaction Before the Equal Rights amendment could be considered by the states, the amendment, in the form of a joint resolution, had to be adopted by both houses of Congress. In 1972, when circumstances made it possible to consider the amendment after 50 years of introduction in every session of Congress, political pundits were predicting adoption and swift ratification by the state legislatures. As we now know, Indiana was the thirty-fifth, and last, state to ratify before June, 1977—the deadline for state ratification negotiated by Representative Emanuel Cellers (D., NY) and Senator Sam Ervin (D., NC). The ERA was one of a few proposed constitutional amendments to carry a restriction on the length of time allowed for ratification by the states. As 1977 approached and ratification of three more states was needed, the deadline was extended by Congress to June, 1982 but the three additional ratifications were not found. The amendment itself was simple enough: three short paragraphs, consisting of the final version written by Alice Paul in 1943 (merging the Lucretia Mott version, introduced in prior sessions, and the Susan B. Anthony version). “Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.” “Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.” “Section 3. This amendment shall take effect seven years after the date of ratification.” The equal rights amendment was introduced every year from 1923 until adopted by Congress in 1972 and, stubbornly, every year after the ratification extended timetable ran out, which was from 1983 to present. In the 107th Congress (2001-2002), Senator Edward M. Kennedy (D., MA) introduced the ERA in the U.S. Senate, word for word as written in 1923, as SJR 10; Representative Carolyn Maloney, (D., NY) introduced it as HJR 40 in the House of Representatives. During the 1960s, Representative Cellers (D-New York) held the Equal Rights Amendment prisoner in his powerful House Judiciary Committee where it stayed for more than a decade.
Recommended publications
  • Mid-Cycle Report: Romney Coattails? GOP Expected to Win Indiana’S EC Votes, with Down- Ballot Implications by BRIAN A
    V17, N41 Thursday, July 12, 2012 Mid-cycle Report: Romney coattails? GOP expected to win Indiana’s EC votes, with down- ballot implications By BRIAN A. HOWEY PLAINFIELD, Ind. - Hoo- sier voters are facing two poten- tial epic tossup races this fall. Nationally, all indications are that the presidential race between President Obama and Republican Mitt Romney will go down to the wire. Likewise, the U.S. Senate race between Republican Rich- ard Mourdock and Democrat Joe Donnelly has all the characteris- tics of being a “Tossup” though the true character of the race won’t be known until mid-Septem- to maintain a big money advantage and time may be run- ber when the third Howey/DePauw Indiana Battleground ning out for Gregg to be able to close what polling has Poll – likely to be the only independent media polling this showed to be leads ranging from 44-31 in a March Howey/ cycle – is published. DePauw Indiana Battleground Poll, and over 20% in a The Indiana gubernatorial and congressional fields couple of recent partisan Republican polls. look to be less competitive. Republican Mike Pence won’t On the congressional front, only the 8th CD race release his fundraising totals until next Monday. Democrat John Gregg’s campaign isn’t saying. But Pence is expected Continued on page 4 The second tsunami By MARK SOUDER FORT WAYNE - The first wave of a tsunami stuns those hit, but the follow-up wave often reaches the high point because it builds upon the first devastation. I feel 2012 will have similar election impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Women in Leadership Issue Annual Women in Leadership
    BusinessSOUTHSIDE ExchangeA DAILY JOURNAL PUBLICATION SPRING 2020 Rosie Chambers Marla Clark BLUE COLLAR JOBSCheryl OUTLOOK Dobbs Kelsey Kasting ANNUAL WOMEN IN LEADERSHIP ISSUE ANNUAL WOMEN IN LEADERSHIP ISSUE PERMIT NO. 220 NO. PERMIT GREENFIELD, IN GREENFIELD, STANDARD PRESORTED DJ-35033581 The Indianapolis News (Indianapolis, Indiana) · 3 Feb 1995, Fri · Page 2 Downloaded on Feb 13, 2020 BusinessSOUTHSIDE Exchange SPRING 2020 I VOLUME 18 I NUMBER 1 HOOSIER WOMEN FIRSTS COPYRIGHT © DAILY JOURNAL, 2020 ALL RighTS RESERVED. People on the Move SUBSCRIPTIONS 4 22 SOUTHSidE BUSINESS EXCHANGE IS PUBLISHED QUARTERLY by THE DAILY JOURNAL. ThE MAGAZINE IS MAILED AT NO CHARGE TO BUSINESSES THROUghOUT GREATER JOHNSON COUNTY. 8 Corporate Chatter TO SUBSCRIBE, SEND YOUR NAME Clipped By: AND addRESS TO: DAILY JOURNAL, P.O. BOX 699, FRANKLIN, IN 46131 12 Women in Leadership AIM_EMMAeIL:d biiZ@aD_AIILYnJOURNAL.NETdiana Thu, EDFITOReb: A1M3Y MA, 2Y 736-2726020 [email protected] 22 Hoosier Women Firsts ADVERTISING: ChRIS COSNER 736-2750 [email protected] GRAPHIC DESIGN: ANNA pERLICH Southside Snapshot [email protected] 26 Copyright © 2020POSTM NewASTsEpR aSepNDe addrs.RcESSo mCHA.NG AESl lTO: R ights Reserved. DAILY JOURNAL, P.O. BOX 699, FRANKLIN, IN 46131 27 Leadership Johnson County workshops SOUTHSidE BUSINESS EXCHANGE IS PUBLISHED QUARTERLY AND diRECT MAILED ON THE fiNAL 28 Ribbon Cuttings DAY OF FEBRUARY (SpRING), MAY (SUMMER), ON THE COVER AUGUST (FALL) AND NOVEMBER (WINTER). Top row, from left: Rosie Cham- DEADLINES FOR EdiTORIAL CONTENT ARE THE fiRST OF THE MONTH IN whiCH THE MAGAZINE IS MAILED. bers, Marla Clark, bottom row: Cheryl Dobbs, Kelsey Kasting PHOTOS BY MARK FREELAND Southside Business Exchange | SPRING 2020 3 n Franklin College offices are located at has named Andrew 5255 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. L. Jack Leonard, Class of 1966, Music Teacher in the North White Became the First Fellows Club Member
    sary Banquet held in Schwitzer Hall. As usual our Memorial service for Letters The banquet was largely attended and our departed members was an inspira- we were honored to have with us Mrs. tional time. This part of the program Lois Brown Dorsett of Detroit. Mrs. was chaired by Mr. and Mrs. Paul Bilby Dorsett was head of the music depart- assisted by class members. ment in the twenties. Also in atten- The Alumni Banquet was a gala af- Disappointed dance were our beloved former presi- fair, but more so because it was follow- dent, I. Lynd Esch and Dr. and Mrs. ed by the party at the home of Dr. and Sease. Ted Clarno acted as master of Mrs. Sease for the 50-year graduates. It Gentlemen: ceremonies. Music was furnished by was a beautiful party and really put the As you may guess I am one of those Beulah Mae Long and Joe Franklin. cap sheaf on our two days of interested, aware alumni out there who Convocation in Ransburg Auditorum celebrating. 0 care about Indiana Central and her was pretty much under control of the future. Also, I am one of those deeply Class of ’28 as Howard Patton introduc- Sincerely, disappointed members of the class of ed each member present and gave their Fanny Varner, Boger, ‘28 ’28 who can’t help feeling a bit chagrin- fine points. ed due to the fact that we were so easily At 1:00 p.m., after the Brown Coun- pushed aside and forgotten after our ty Picnic, on the 20th the new Fiftieth Anniversary celebration.
    [Show full text]
  • DREAM TEAM Bruce Terry Loara HS, Anaheim
    1978-79 WRESTLING USA MAGAZINE’S HIGH SCHOOL All-AMERICA TEAM DREAM TEAM Alan Ginsberg, Windsor, Connecticut Bruce Terry Loara HS, Anaheim, CA Sammy Vazquez, Hartford, Connecticut Randall Pryor Weir HS, Wierton, WV Darrell, Gravatt, Camden, Delaware Mark Trizzino Central HS, Joliet, IL Carl Wagner, Wilmington, Delaware Mark Zimmer St Francis DeSales, Columbus, OH Kevin Agnea, Honolulu, Hawaii Jeff Kerber Emmetsburg HS, Emmetsburg, IA Darby Lewis, Boise, Idaho Mike Mills Mt Pleasant HS, Mt Pleasant, MI Emiliano Hernandes, Park Ridge, Illinois Jim Farina Leyden HS, Franklin Park, IL Dale Schmacht, Cambridge, Illinois Mike Baker Manzano HS, Albuquerque, NM Bob Whitley, New Lenox, Illinois Joe East Grove City HS, Grove City, OH David Morkel, Waterloo, Iowa Jeff Wilson Mercer Island HS, Mercer Island, WA Mike Moriarty, Louisville, Kentucky John Sherlock South HS, Omaha, NE Rick Mansier, Gardiner, Maine Butch Jansen, Baltimore, Maryland OTHER ALL-AMERICA SELECTIONS Bob Almeida, Billerica, Massachusetts Mike Stoner North Pole HS, North Pole, AK Tom Trovato, Marshfield, Massachusetts Joe Guinn Rancho Cotate HS, Rohnert Pk, CA Jack Nicholson, Grandville, Michigan Alan Goldman Cherry Creek HS, Englewood, CO Paul Perry, Munsing, Michigan Tony Calderaio Boca Raton HS, Boca Raton, FL Robert Redmann, Anoka, Minnesota Charlie Heard Troup HS, LaGrange, GA Ross Redman, Anoka, Minnesota Mike Kos Waubonsie Valley HS, Aurora, IL Chuck Vavrosky, Bloomington, Minnesota Don Stevens Carl Sandburg HS, Orland PK, IL Matt Sauls, Independence, Missouri Danny Waid
    [Show full text]
  • Prayer Practices
    Floor Action 5-145 Prayer Practices Legislatures operate with a certain element of pomp, ceremony and procedure that flavor the institution with a unique air of tradition and theatre. The mystique of the opening ceremonies and rituals help to bring order and dignity to the proceedings. One of these opening ceremonies is the offering of a prayer. Use of legislative prayer. The practice of opening legislative sessions with prayer is long- standing. The custom draws its roots from both houses of the British Parliament, which, according to noted parliamentarian Luther Cushing, from time ”immemorial” began each day with a “reading of the prayers.” In the United States, this custom has continued without interruption at the federal level since the first Congress under the Constitution (1789) and for more than a century in many states. Almost all state legislatures still use an opening prayer as part of their tradition and procedure (see table 02-5.50). In the Massachusetts Senate, a prayer is offered at the beginning of floor sessions for special occasions. Although the use of an opening prayer is standard practice, the timing of when the prayer occurs varies (see table 02-5.51). In the majority of legislative bodies, the prayer is offered after the floor session is called to order, but before the opening roll call is taken. Prayers sometimes are given before floor sessions are officially called to order; this is true in the Colorado House, Nebraska Senate and Ohio House. Many chambers vary on who delivers the prayer. Forty-seven chambers allow people other than the designated legislative chaplain or a visiting chaplain to offer the opening prayer (see table 02-5.52).
    [Show full text]
  • A Rare Campaign for Senate Succession Senate President Pro Tem Sen
    V23, N25 Tursday, Feb. 15, 2018 A rare campaign for Senate succession Senate President Pro Tem Sen. Ryan Mishler in Kenley’s appropria- Long’s announcement sets up tions chair, and Sen. Travis Holdman in battle last seen in 2006, 1980 Hershman’s tax and fscal policy chair. By BRIAN A. HOWEY Unlike former House INDIANAPOLIS – The timing of Senate minority leader Scott President Pro Tempore David Long’s retirement Pelath, who wouldn’t announcement, coming even vote on a suc- in the middle of this ses- cessor, Long is likely sion, was the big surprise to play a decisive on Tuesday. But those of role here. As one us who read Statehouse hallway veteran ob- tea leaves, the notion served, “I think Da- that Long would follow vid will play a large his wife, Melissa, into the sunset was a change and positive role in of the guard realization that began to take shape choosing his succes- with Long’s sine die speech last April. sor. That’s a good For just the third time since 1980, this thing in my view. sets up a succession dynamic that will be fasci- He is clear-eyed and nating. Here are several key points to consider: knows fully what is n Long is taking a systemic approach to Senate President Pro Tem David Long said Tuesday, required of anyone reshaping the Senate with the reality that after “No one is indispensible” and “you know when it’s in that role. And ... November, he, Luke Kenley and Brandt Hersh- time to step down.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics Indiana
    Politics Indiana V14 N43 Thursday, June 19, 2008 Thompson-Oxley seeking unity Waterman-Jehl look for a ‘miracle’ while Daniels picks up key RTL nod By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS - For the first time in Hoosier history, when Jill Long Thomp- son addresses the Indiana Democratic Convention around 3:30 p.m. Saturday, she will become the first female nominee, following the footsteps of other gender pioneers like Virginia Dill McCarty, Ann DeLaney and Vi Simpson. She will greet a convention with the theme “Restoring Indiana’s Promises” along with her new running mate, State Rep. Dennie Oxley. The campaign hopes it closes a controversial and unsettled period for Indiana Democrats. The state party and much of the establishment backed Jim Schellinger’s gubernatorial bid. The six weeks since her primary victory has offered an array of mixed signals. The Jill Long Thompson with State Rep. Dennie Oxley and his wife, Jayme, at the State- campaign had house on Monday. (HPI Photo by Brian A. Howey) only two press See Page 3 Daniels’ Iraq calculus By SHAW R. FRIEDMAN LaPORTE - How could he have gotten it so wrong? How could Mitch Daniels have failed to properly advise his President and his country on the true costs of war? Yes, volumes have been written on how “I don’t think it’s going to be nearly “All the President’s Men” gave him bad advice in the lead-up to war that big a distraction. It’s not and trimmed and tailored their views to suit the President’s inclination to new; it’s old news by now.” wage a war of choice.
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana House of Representatives
    Indiana General Assembly Contact Info: All Indiana House of Representatives District First Last Phone Legislative Assistant Legislator's Email Twitter House Democrats @inhsedems House Republicans @inhouseGOP HD 01 Carolyn Jackson 317.232.9875 Peter Okeafor [email protected] HD 02 Earl Harris 317.234.9048 Luis Nino [email protected] @Earl_Harris_Jr HD 03 Ragen Hatcher 317.234.3101 Jalen Jones [email protected] HD 04 Ed Soliday 317.234.9450 Rachel Swartwood [email protected] HD 05 Dale DeVon 317.232.9769 Hannah Joy Alte [email protected] @DaleForStateRep HD 06 Maureen Bauer 317.234.3101 Jalen Jones [email protected] @Maureen4Indiana HD 07 Jake Teshka 317.232.9643 Elias Arnett [email protected] @jaketeshka HD 08 Ryan Dvorak 317.232.9671 Ian McDaniel [email protected] @ryandvorak HD 09 Pat Boy 317.233.5248 Shelby Baumgartner [email protected] @pat4indiana9 HD 10 Chuck Moseley 317.232.9987 Kyle Donohue [email protected] HD 11 Mike Aylesworth 317.324.9447 Connor McCarthy [email protected] HD 12 Mike Andrade 317-232-9628 Samantha Lozano [email protected] @MikeAndradeIN HD 13 Sharon Negele 317.232.9816 Lewis Ostermeyer [email protected] HD 14 Vernon Smith 317-232-9976 Anne Hancock [email protected] HD 15 Hal Slager 317.232.9833 Matthew LoPrete [email protected] HD 16 Douglas Gutwein 317.234.9139 Jake Carrico [email protected] HD 17 Jack Jordan 317.232.9753 Josh Bain [email protected] HD 18 Craig Snow 317.234.9028 Evan Petty [email protected] HD 19 Julie Oltoff 317.232.9620 Andrew Alvarez [email protected] HD 20 Jim Pressel 317.232.9850 Jackson Thomas [email protected] HD 21 Tim Wesco 317.232.9753 Josh Bain [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • History of the U.S. Attorneys
    Bicentennial Celebration of the United States Attorneys 1789 - 1989 "The United States Attorney is the representative not of an ordinary party to a controversy, but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all; and whose interest, therefore, in a criminal prosecution is not that it shall win a case, but that justice shall be done. As such, he is in a peculiar and very definite sense the servant of the law, the twofold aim of which is that guilt shall not escape or innocence suffer. He may prosecute with earnestness and vigor– indeed, he should do so. But, while he may strike hard blows, he is not at liberty to strike foul ones. It is as much his duty to refrain from improper methods calculated to produce a wrongful conviction as it is to use every legitimate means to bring about a just one." QUOTED FROM STATEMENT OF MR. JUSTICE SUTHERLAND, BERGER V. UNITED STATES, 295 U. S. 88 (1935) Note: The information in this document was compiled from historical records maintained by the Offices of the United States Attorneys and by the Department of Justice. Every effort has been made to prepare accurate information. In some instances, this document mentions officials without the “United States Attorney” title, who nevertheless served under federal appointment to enforce the laws of the United States in federal territories prior to statehood and the creation of a federal judicial district. INTRODUCTION In this, the Bicentennial Year of the United States Constitution, the people of America find cause to celebrate the principles formulated at the inception of the nation Alexis de Tocqueville called, “The Great Experiment.” The experiment has worked, and the survival of the Constitution is proof of that.
    [Show full text]
  • Advocacy Guide
    Advocacy Guide There are many ways to make a difference as an advocate for people with disabilities. Let Your Local Officials Hear Your Opinion As a citizen, your opinions help elected officials decide how to vote on issues. Let your elected officials know your opinions through letters, e-mails, phone calls, etc. Remember, they are very busy and you want your message to have as much impact as possible. For the most impact, your communication should be brief, clear and focused on just one issue. Attend Public Meetings Meetings of the city council, county council, Indiana General Assembly, school board, etc. are open to the public. Attending these meetings helps keep you informed of the way public business is transacted and how the various elected officials interact. In addition, public meetings give citizens a good opportunity to give their opinions by speaking during the public feedback section of the meetings. Nearly all elected officials host public meetings. They are at schools, libraries, churches, etc. This is your opportunity to hear from your elected official what they are working on and to give your input on issues. Letters to the Editor Writing a letter to the editor is an effective way to publicly discuss an issue and influence the decisions of local officials. Every newspaper has different requirements for letters to the editor. In general, as with letters to elected officials, it is important to be brief, clear, and concise and focus on just one issue. Join an Advocacy Group Joining an advocacy group is one way to increase your awareness to elected officials.
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana Law Review Volume 52 2019 Number 3
    Indiana Law Review Volume 52 2019 Number 3 NOTES PUBLIC BUSINESS IS THE PUBLIC’S BUSINESS: KOCH’S IMPLICATIONS FOR INDIANA’S ACCESS TO PUBLIC RECORDS ACT COURTNEY ABSHIRE* INTRODUCTION “Public business is the public’s business. The people have the right to know. Freedom of information is their just heritage. Without that the citizens of a democracy have but changed their kings.” – Harold L. Cross1 In 2016, the Indiana Supreme Court faced the question of whether records requested pursuant to the Access to Public Records Act (“APRA”) could be withheld on the basis of the legislative work product exemption in APRA, and the Court held for the first time that APRA applied to the Indiana General Assembly.2 But the Court declined to review the question of whether the Indiana House Republican Caucus properly denied the requested records out of concern that doing so would violate the distribution of powers provision in the Indiana Constitution.3 The Court principally relied on two precedent cases involving the Indiana Constitution’s distribution of powers provision, Masariu v. Marion Superior Court and Berry v. Crawford, to formulate its holding in Citizens Action Coalition v. Koch.4 Shortly after the Indiana Supreme Court decided Koch, the Indiana Court of Appeals heard a case involving nondisclosure of records by the Governor’s *. J.D. Candidate, 2019, Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law; MPA 2016, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis – Indianapolis, Indiana; B.A. 2012, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis – Indianapolis, Indiana. I would like to thank Professor Cynthia Baker for her continued guidance and support throughout the Note-writing process.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2019 Political Contributions.Xlsx
    WalgreenCoPAC Political Contributions: FY 2019 Recipient Amount Arkansas WOMACK FOR CONGRESS COMMITTEE 1,000.00 Arizona BRADLEY FOR ARIZONA 2018 200.00 COMMITTE TO ELECT ROBERT MEZA FOR STATE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 200.00 ELECT MICHELLE UDALL 200.00 FRIENDS OF WARREN PETERSEN 200.00 GALLEGO FOR ARIZONA 1,000.00 JAY LAWRENCE FOR THE HOUSE 18 200.00 KATE BROPHY MCGEE FOR AZ 200.00 NANCY BARTO FOR HOUSE 2018 200.00 REGINA E. COBB 2018 200.00 SHOPE FOR HOUSE 200.00 VINCE LEACH FOR SENATE 200.00 VOTE HEATHER CARTER SENATE 200.00 VOTE MESNARD 200.00 WENINGER FOR AZ HOUSE 200.00 California AMI BERA FOR CONGRESS 4,000.00 KAREN BASS FOR CONGRESS 3,500.00 KEVIN MCCARTHY FOR CONGRESS 5,000.00 SCOTT PETERS FOR CONGRESS 1,000.00 TONY CARDENAS FOR CONGRESS 1,000.00 WALTERS FOR CONGRESS 1,000.00 Colorado CHRIS KENNEDY BACKPAC 400.00 COFFMAN FOR CONGRESS 2018 1,000.00 CORY GARDNER FOR SENATE 5,000.00 DANEYA ESGAR LEADERSHIP FUND 400.00 STEVE FENBERG LEADERSHIP FUND 400.00 Connecticut LARSON FOR CONGRESS 1,000.00 Delaware CARPER FOR SENATE 1,000.00 Florida BILIRAKIS FOR CONGRESS 1,000.00 DARREN SOTO FOR CONGRESS 1,000.00 DONNA SHALALA FOR CONGRESS 1,000.00 STEPHANIE MURPHY FOR CONGRESS 1,000.00 VERN BUCHANAN FOR CONGRESS 2,500.00 Georgia BUDDY CARTER FOR CONGRESS 4,000.00 Illinois 1 WalgreenCoPAC Political Contributions: FY 2019 Recipient Amount CHUY GARCIA FOR CONGRESS 1,000.00 CITIZENS FOR RUSH 1,000.00 DAN LIPINSKI FOR CONGRESS 1,000.00 DAVIS FOR CONGRESS/FRIENDS OF DAVIS 1,500.00 FRIENDS OF CHERI BUSTOS 1,000.00 FRIENDS OF DICK DURBIN COMMITTEE
    [Show full text]