Advocacy Guide
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Prayer Practices
Floor Action 5-145 Prayer Practices Legislatures operate with a certain element of pomp, ceremony and procedure that flavor the institution with a unique air of tradition and theatre. The mystique of the opening ceremonies and rituals help to bring order and dignity to the proceedings. One of these opening ceremonies is the offering of a prayer. Use of legislative prayer. The practice of opening legislative sessions with prayer is long- standing. The custom draws its roots from both houses of the British Parliament, which, according to noted parliamentarian Luther Cushing, from time ”immemorial” began each day with a “reading of the prayers.” In the United States, this custom has continued without interruption at the federal level since the first Congress under the Constitution (1789) and for more than a century in many states. Almost all state legislatures still use an opening prayer as part of their tradition and procedure (see table 02-5.50). In the Massachusetts Senate, a prayer is offered at the beginning of floor sessions for special occasions. Although the use of an opening prayer is standard practice, the timing of when the prayer occurs varies (see table 02-5.51). In the majority of legislative bodies, the prayer is offered after the floor session is called to order, but before the opening roll call is taken. Prayers sometimes are given before floor sessions are officially called to order; this is true in the Colorado House, Nebraska Senate and Ohio House. Many chambers vary on who delivers the prayer. Forty-seven chambers allow people other than the designated legislative chaplain or a visiting chaplain to offer the opening prayer (see table 02-5.52). -
A Rare Campaign for Senate Succession Senate President Pro Tem Sen
V23, N25 Tursday, Feb. 15, 2018 A rare campaign for Senate succession Senate President Pro Tem Sen. Ryan Mishler in Kenley’s appropria- Long’s announcement sets up tions chair, and Sen. Travis Holdman in battle last seen in 2006, 1980 Hershman’s tax and fscal policy chair. By BRIAN A. HOWEY Unlike former House INDIANAPOLIS – The timing of Senate minority leader Scott President Pro Tempore David Long’s retirement Pelath, who wouldn’t announcement, coming even vote on a suc- in the middle of this ses- cessor, Long is likely sion, was the big surprise to play a decisive on Tuesday. But those of role here. As one us who read Statehouse hallway veteran ob- tea leaves, the notion served, “I think Da- that Long would follow vid will play a large his wife, Melissa, into the sunset was a change and positive role in of the guard realization that began to take shape choosing his succes- with Long’s sine die speech last April. sor. That’s a good For just the third time since 1980, this thing in my view. sets up a succession dynamic that will be fasci- He is clear-eyed and nating. Here are several key points to consider: knows fully what is n Long is taking a systemic approach to Senate President Pro Tem David Long said Tuesday, required of anyone reshaping the Senate with the reality that after “No one is indispensible” and “you know when it’s in that role. And ... November, he, Luke Kenley and Brandt Hersh- time to step down. -
Indiana House of Representatives
Indiana General Assembly Contact Info: All Indiana House of Representatives District First Last Phone Legislative Assistant Legislator's Email Twitter House Democrats @inhsedems House Republicans @inhouseGOP HD 01 Carolyn Jackson 317.232.9875 Peter Okeafor [email protected] HD 02 Earl Harris 317.234.9048 Luis Nino [email protected] @Earl_Harris_Jr HD 03 Ragen Hatcher 317.234.3101 Jalen Jones [email protected] HD 04 Ed Soliday 317.234.9450 Rachel Swartwood [email protected] HD 05 Dale DeVon 317.232.9769 Hannah Joy Alte [email protected] @DaleForStateRep HD 06 Maureen Bauer 317.234.3101 Jalen Jones [email protected] @Maureen4Indiana HD 07 Jake Teshka 317.232.9643 Elias Arnett [email protected] @jaketeshka HD 08 Ryan Dvorak 317.232.9671 Ian McDaniel [email protected] @ryandvorak HD 09 Pat Boy 317.233.5248 Shelby Baumgartner [email protected] @pat4indiana9 HD 10 Chuck Moseley 317.232.9987 Kyle Donohue [email protected] HD 11 Mike Aylesworth 317.324.9447 Connor McCarthy [email protected] HD 12 Mike Andrade 317-232-9628 Samantha Lozano [email protected] @MikeAndradeIN HD 13 Sharon Negele 317.232.9816 Lewis Ostermeyer [email protected] HD 14 Vernon Smith 317-232-9976 Anne Hancock [email protected] HD 15 Hal Slager 317.232.9833 Matthew LoPrete [email protected] HD 16 Douglas Gutwein 317.234.9139 Jake Carrico [email protected] HD 17 Jack Jordan 317.232.9753 Josh Bain [email protected] HD 18 Craig Snow 317.234.9028 Evan Petty [email protected] HD 19 Julie Oltoff 317.232.9620 Andrew Alvarez [email protected] HD 20 Jim Pressel 317.232.9850 Jackson Thomas [email protected] HD 21 Tim Wesco 317.232.9753 Josh Bain [email protected] -
Indiana Law Review Volume 52 2019 Number 3
Indiana Law Review Volume 52 2019 Number 3 NOTES PUBLIC BUSINESS IS THE PUBLIC’S BUSINESS: KOCH’S IMPLICATIONS FOR INDIANA’S ACCESS TO PUBLIC RECORDS ACT COURTNEY ABSHIRE* INTRODUCTION “Public business is the public’s business. The people have the right to know. Freedom of information is their just heritage. Without that the citizens of a democracy have but changed their kings.” – Harold L. Cross1 In 2016, the Indiana Supreme Court faced the question of whether records requested pursuant to the Access to Public Records Act (“APRA”) could be withheld on the basis of the legislative work product exemption in APRA, and the Court held for the first time that APRA applied to the Indiana General Assembly.2 But the Court declined to review the question of whether the Indiana House Republican Caucus properly denied the requested records out of concern that doing so would violate the distribution of powers provision in the Indiana Constitution.3 The Court principally relied on two precedent cases involving the Indiana Constitution’s distribution of powers provision, Masariu v. Marion Superior Court and Berry v. Crawford, to formulate its holding in Citizens Action Coalition v. Koch.4 Shortly after the Indiana Supreme Court decided Koch, the Indiana Court of Appeals heard a case involving nondisclosure of records by the Governor’s *. J.D. Candidate, 2019, Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law; MPA 2016, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis – Indianapolis, Indiana; B.A. 2012, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis – Indianapolis, Indiana. I would like to thank Professor Cynthia Baker for her continued guidance and support throughout the Note-writing process. -
FY 2019 Political Contributions.Xlsx
WalgreenCoPAC Political Contributions: FY 2019 Recipient Amount Arkansas WOMACK FOR CONGRESS COMMITTEE 1,000.00 Arizona BRADLEY FOR ARIZONA 2018 200.00 COMMITTE TO ELECT ROBERT MEZA FOR STATE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 200.00 ELECT MICHELLE UDALL 200.00 FRIENDS OF WARREN PETERSEN 200.00 GALLEGO FOR ARIZONA 1,000.00 JAY LAWRENCE FOR THE HOUSE 18 200.00 KATE BROPHY MCGEE FOR AZ 200.00 NANCY BARTO FOR HOUSE 2018 200.00 REGINA E. COBB 2018 200.00 SHOPE FOR HOUSE 200.00 VINCE LEACH FOR SENATE 200.00 VOTE HEATHER CARTER SENATE 200.00 VOTE MESNARD 200.00 WENINGER FOR AZ HOUSE 200.00 California AMI BERA FOR CONGRESS 4,000.00 KAREN BASS FOR CONGRESS 3,500.00 KEVIN MCCARTHY FOR CONGRESS 5,000.00 SCOTT PETERS FOR CONGRESS 1,000.00 TONY CARDENAS FOR CONGRESS 1,000.00 WALTERS FOR CONGRESS 1,000.00 Colorado CHRIS KENNEDY BACKPAC 400.00 COFFMAN FOR CONGRESS 2018 1,000.00 CORY GARDNER FOR SENATE 5,000.00 DANEYA ESGAR LEADERSHIP FUND 400.00 STEVE FENBERG LEADERSHIP FUND 400.00 Connecticut LARSON FOR CONGRESS 1,000.00 Delaware CARPER FOR SENATE 1,000.00 Florida BILIRAKIS FOR CONGRESS 1,000.00 DARREN SOTO FOR CONGRESS 1,000.00 DONNA SHALALA FOR CONGRESS 1,000.00 STEPHANIE MURPHY FOR CONGRESS 1,000.00 VERN BUCHANAN FOR CONGRESS 2,500.00 Georgia BUDDY CARTER FOR CONGRESS 4,000.00 Illinois 1 WalgreenCoPAC Political Contributions: FY 2019 Recipient Amount CHUY GARCIA FOR CONGRESS 1,000.00 CITIZENS FOR RUSH 1,000.00 DAN LIPINSKI FOR CONGRESS 1,000.00 DAVIS FOR CONGRESS/FRIENDS OF DAVIS 1,500.00 FRIENDS OF CHERI BUSTOS 1,000.00 FRIENDS OF DICK DURBIN COMMITTEE -
Indiana General Assembly Report Week Nine the Final Committee Hearings on Bills Took Place on Monday in the House. the Balanc
Indiana General Assembly Report Week Nine The final committee hearings on bills took place on Monday in the House. The balance of the week was dedicated to House and Senate floor action on 2nd and 3rd Readings. The Senate completed work on 3rd readings Tuesday and the House finished 3rd readings Thursday. A number of concurrence and dissent motions also progressed, sending a handful of bills to the Governor. On Wednesday, the Senate honored seven members who are retiring along with Lieutenant Governor Ellspermann, who resigned her office on Wednesday. Former GOP State Chair, Eric Holcomb, nominated by Governor Pence as Ellspermann’s replacement, was approved as the new Lieutenant Governor by both chambers on Thursday. In an effort to adjourn earlier in the week next week, both the House and Senate were in session Friday, which is typically a day legislators are back home. On Tuesday in the Senate, Senate Bill 383 received a 49-1 vote on the motion to concur with changes made in the House. As a reminder, SB 383 creates a new tracker for water utilities to use for infrastructure improvements and repairs with some important “first of its kind” accountability measures imposed on the utility. Additionally, SB383 includes a new policy statement from the legislature, which is applicable to all public utilities, declaring that utility bills should be affordable for current and future generations. CAC offered strong support for this important policy direction from the legislature. SB383 is authored by Sen. Ed Charbonneau (R- Valparaiso) and proceeds to the Governor for further action. On Friday SB15, a concurrence motion to study food desert challenges, received the Senate’s support with a vote of 36-9. -
Suggested Improvements in the Indiana Legislative Process
Indiana Law Journal Volume 35 Issue 2 Article 5 Winter 1960 Suggested Improvements in the Indiana Legislative Process Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj Part of the Legislation Commons Recommended Citation (1960) "Suggested Improvements in the Indiana Legislative Process," Indiana Law Journal: Vol. 35 : Iss. 2 , Article 5. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol35/iss2/5 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Indiana Law Journal by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOTES it to the testimonial skills required for particular testimony. This expert evidence should be admitted at any time when the witness' credibility is vital to the outcome of the case. Psychologists, however, are infrequently offered as discrediting witnesses." The courts have had to determine generally whether similar evidence is admissible when given by physi- cians and teachers. To the extent that non-psychologists are trained to measure and observe the degree of subnormal intelligence or memory, their evidence would appar to be as valuable as that of the psychologist, particularly when the testimony to be discredited requires complex testi- monial skills." If the court is not satisfied with the physician's or teacher's psychological training, the evidence should be treated exactly like lay testimony and excluded. Offered in proper cases, the evidence of psychologists and those trained in the field can be of great value to the jury in their evaluation of the weight to be given a witness' testimony. -
The Indiana State House a Self-Guided Tour
The Indiana State House A Self-Guided Tour History Completed in 1888, the The Indiana Territory was carved in 1800 from the Northwest Territory. The new territory State House is home to contained all of what is now Indiana, Illinois, Wisconsin, a great portion of Michigan and officials from all three part of Minnesota. The first seat of government for the Indiana Territory was located in branches of government: Vincennes (1800-1813); the government building, believed to have been built in 1800, is executive, legislative and now a State Historic Site. judicial. The seat of government was moved to Corydon in 1813. Corydon was a logical choice at To become acquainted with the time because settlers and supplies heading west arrived via the Ohio River a short this important and historic distance away. Indiana became a state on December 11, 1816, and Corydon remained the building, begin by exploring seat of government. The original State House is now a State Historic Site. It was built at some State House history. a cost of $3,000. The building was made of Indiana limestone. Certain areas are not Although it was the state’s first seat of government, no one from Corydon had ever served available for viewing as governor until Frank O’Bannon was elected in 1996. without the presence of a As more roads were built and settlement moved northward, a centrally located seat of State House Tour Guide. government was needed. In January 1821 the site where Indianapolis is now located was These areas include the designated as such, and the city was created. -
Richard E. Mourdock Indiana
INDIANA RICHARD E. MOURDOCK TREASURER OF STATE 200 W. Washington, St., #242 Indianapolis, IN 46204 Tel: 317-232-6386 Fax: 317-233-1780 Email: [email protected] Website: www.state.in.us/tos/ Selection Method: Constitutional— Elected by the People Term Length: Four Years Term Limit: No more than eight years in any 12-year period Served: Since February 2007 Next Election Year: 2014 Salary: $74,580 (plus $12,000 annual housing allowance) KEY STAFF Jim Holden, Chief Deputy Treasurer and General Counsel 317-232-6388 Michael Frick, Deputy Treasurer and Portfolio Manager BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH 317-232-0140 Born Oct. 8, 1951 in Wauseon, OH. Currently resides Christopher Conner, Director of Communications and in Evansville. Wife’s name: Marilyn. B.S., natural Special Projects systems, De%ance College; M.S., geology, Ball State 317-232-6387 University. Republican. Alicia Crabtree, Scheduler and Administrative Assistant Treasurer Mourdock began his career in public 317-232-6386 service as the Vanderburgh County Commis- Jennifer Gilson, Scheduler and Administrative Assistant sioner from 1995 to 2002. Afterwards, Treasurer 317-232-6386 Mourdock founded R.E. Mourdock & Associates, an environmental consulting %rm. He is a licensed professional geologist. Prior to beginning his OFFICE OF THE TREASURER consulting practice, Treasurer Mourdock spent 16 years as a top executive with Koester Companies, Total Number of Employees: 12 Inc. He has over 30 years of private sector business Size of Treasury Annual Budget: $870,106 management experience. Size of Portfolio Managed by Treasury: $6,800,000,000 Treasurer Mourdock previously served as the vice- chairman of the College Savings Plan Network The treasurer is responsible for the receipt and custody and the Midwest Regional Vice President of the of all monies paid into the state treasury. -
Who Are Your Elected Officials?
Who Are Your Elected Officials? Office of the Indiana Secretary of State Indiana Election Division and the Help America Vote Act Elected Officials - Office Descriptions Federal State County City/Town President Governor County Commissioner Trustee County Council Vice President Lieutenant Governor Township Assessor Member United States Township Advisory Secretary of State County Auditor Representative Board Member United States Senator Treasurer of State County Assessor Mayor Town/City Council Auditor of State County Treasurer Member Attorney General County Surveyor City Clerk Superintendent of Public County Recorder Clerk-Treasurer Instruction Indiana State Senator County Coroner Indiana State Judge of the Superior Representative Court Judge of the Circuit Court Prosecuting Attorney County Clerk of the Circuit Court County Sheriff President The President is both the head of state and head of government of the United States of America, and Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces. Under Article II of the Constitution, the President is responsible for the execution and enforcement of the laws created by Congress. Fifteen executive departments — each led by an appointed member of the President's Cabinet — carry out the day-to-day administration of the federal government. The President also appoints the heads of more than 50 independent federal commissions, such as the Federal Reserve Board or the Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as federal judges, ambassadors, and other federal offices. The President has the power either to sign legislation into law or to veto bills enacted by Congress, although Congress may override a veto with a two-thirds vote of both houses. The Executive Branch conducts diplomacy with other nations, and the President has the power to negotiate and sign treaties, which also must be ratified by two-thirds of the Senate. -
A Student's Guide to State Government
Learn About Indiana A Student’s Guide to State Government Distributed by: State Rep. Curt Nisly [email protected] www.IndianaHouseRepublicans.com 1-800-382-9841 Table of Contents What is a normal day like for a legislator? p. 3 Requirements p. 4 Legislator Full-Time Jobs p. 5 State Government Facts p. 6 The General Assembly p. 7 Indiana House Page Program p. 8 How a Bill Becomes a Law p. 9 Indiana Fun Facts p. 10 Government Glossary p. 11 State Government Puzzles p. 12 Puzzle Solutions p. 13 2 What is a normal day like for a legislator? A typical day for a legislator during session consists of meetings with constituents, session and committee hearings. Each legislator is assigned to a committee, or multiple committees, to study proposed legislation. During the committee meetings, they hear public testimony from citizens, experts and members of government agen- cies. Session can be very time-consuming. There Legislators cast their votes during are days when legislators are in session for more session in the House Chamber. than 12 hours, listening to debates on bills and casting their votes. Many school groups come to the Statehouse in Indianapolis to learn about Indiana history, and representatives often meet with students to help them learn about the General Assembly. Also, just because session doesn’t last 365 days a year, doesn’t mean they stop working for you. As a matter-of-fact, when legislators are back home, they spend a lot of time attending meetings and community events. In order to best represent their communities, it is important that legislators meet with constituents constantly to learn what is most important to them. -
Indiana General Assembly
The Indiana General Assembly By Gerald C. Wright, Indiana University David Ogle, State Legislative Leaders Foundation Joint Project on Term Limits 2004 National Conference of State Legislatures Council of State Governments State Legislative Leaders’ Foundation 7700 East First Place Denver, CO 80230-7143 (303) 364-7700 • fax (303) 364-7800 444 North Capitol Street, N.W., Suite 515 Washington, D.C. 20001 (202) 624-5400 • fax (202) 737-1069 http://www.ncsl.org © 2005 by the National Conference of State Legislatures. All rights reserved. Overview This is a report on the Indiana legislature, which serves as one of three control states in the NCSL/Council of State Governments joint project on term limits. Most of the evidence presented here comes from interviews carried out by Gerald Wright and David Ogle during October 8-10, 2003 in Indianapolis. We interviewed a disproportionate amount of individuals on the Senate side versus the House side among those currently serving in the legislature, but this is balanced by extensive House experience among the lobbyists we talked with, including two former speakers. This analysis is supplemented in places with statistical data gathered to match data collected for other states in the larger study as well as data from the Knowledgeable Observers survey conducted by Karl Kurz and NCSL. We felt that, with few exceptions, the interviews were quite consistent in giving us a portrait of the legislature and how it operates. The theme of politics and policy making in the Hoosier state are nicely captured in the assessment of former House Speaker Mike Philips who noted that, “not all that much has changed” in how the legislature does its business.