DOCSLIB.ORG

Literature Cited for Proposed Rule to Designate Critical Habitat for The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Literature Cited for Proposed Rule to Designate Critical Habitat for The Literature Cited for Proposed Rule to Designate Critical Habitat for the Georgetown Salamander and the Designation of Critical Habitat for the Salado Salamander Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2020–0048 Bendik, N. 2011a. Jollyville Plateau Salamander Status Report. City of Austin Watershed Protection. SR-11-10. 43 pp. Bendik, N. 2011b. Personal communication. Jollyville Plateau Salamander (Eurycea tonkawae). Presentation from City of Austin Watershed Protection to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. October 5, 2011. Bendik, N. 2013. Personal communication. Pilot Study: Movement of Eurycea tonkawae near Lanier Spring, Bull Creek, Travis Co., Texas. City of Austin, public comments on FWS- R2-ES-2013-0001. March 11, 2013. 4 pp. Bendik, N. and A.G. Gluesenkamp. 2012. Body length shrinkage in an endangered amphibian is associated with drought. Journal of Zoology 290 (1): 35-41. Bendik, N.F. 2017. Demographics, reproduction, growth, and abundance of Jollyville Plateau salamanders (Eurycea tonkawae). Ecology and Evolution 7(13): 5002-5015. Bendik, N.F, K.D. McEntire, and B.N. Sissel. 2016. Movement, demographics, and occupancy dynamics of a federally-threatened salamander: evaluating the adequacy of critical habitat. PeerJ 4:e1817; DOI 10.7717/peerj.1817. Bendik, N.F., J.M. Meik, A.G. Gluesenkamp, C. Roelke, and P.T. Chippindale. 2013. Biogeography, phylogeny, and morphological evolution of central Texas cave and spring salamanders. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:201. Bowles, B.D., Sanders, M.S., and R.S. Hansen. 2006. Ecology of the Jollyville Plateau salamander (Eurycea tonkawae: Plethodontidae) with an assessment of the potential effects of urbanization. Hydrobiologia 553: 111-120. Brooks, S.L. 2011. Cease and desist order from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2 pp. Cambrian Environmental. 2018. 2018 Annual report for Permit TE 37416B-0 covering activities for Cambrian Environmental. Submitted to Austin Ecological Services Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 392 pp. Caro, T., Eadie, J., and A. Sih. 2005. Use of substitute species in conservation biology. Conservation Biology 19 (6): 1821-1826. Chippindale, P.T., A.H. Price, Wiens, J.J., and D. M. Hillis. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships and systematic revision of central Texas hemidactyliine plethodontid salamanders. Herpetological Monographs 14: 1-80. COA (City of Austin). 2001. Jollyville Plateau Water Quality and Salamander Assessment. Water Quality Report Series COA-ERM 1999-01. Prepared by City of Austin, Watershed Protection Department, Environmental Resources Management Division, Water Resource Evaluation Section. Austin, Texas, USA, 381 pp. COA (City of Austin). 2012. Personal communication. Public comments on proposed rule (FWS-R2-ES-2012-0035). City of Austin. October 22, 2012. 39 pp. Cole, R.A. 1995. A review of status, research and management of taxon viability for three neotenic aquatic salamanders in Travis County, Texas. Pages 15-57 in Bowles, D.E., ed. A Review of the Status of Current Critical Biological and Ecological Information on the Eurycea Salamanders Located in Travis County, Texas, Resource Protection Division, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Austin, Texas. Devitt, T.J., A.M. Wright, D.C. Cannatella, and D.M. Hillis. 2019a. Species delimitation in endangered groundwater salamanders: Implications for aquifer management and biodiversity conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 (7): 2624-2633. Devitt, T.J., A.M. Wright, D.C. Cannatella, and D.M. Hillis. 2019b. Supplementary Information: Species delimitation in endangered groundwater salamanders: Implications for aquifer management and biodiversity conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 (7): 1-29. Diaz, P. and M. Montagne. 2017. Salado salamander monitoring final report 2017. Texas Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office. 20pp. Diaz, P. and J. Bronson-Warren. 2018. Salado salamander monitoring final report 2018. Texas Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office. 19pp. Diaz, P. and J. Bronson-Warren. 2019. Salado salamander monitoring final report 2019. Texas Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office. 19pp. Dries, L. 2011. Personal communication. Site visit of Barton Springs Complex with Laurie Dries, Environmental Scientist for the City of Austin Watershed Protection Program. September 14, 2011. 2 pp. Forstner, M. 2012. An evaluation of the existing scientific evidence for the currently proposed hyperdiversity of salamanders (Eurycea sp.) in central Texas. Prepared for the Texas Salamander Coalition. June 2012. 28 pp. Gillespie, J.H. 2013. Application of stable isotope analysis to study temporal changes in foraging ecology in a highly endangered amphibian. PLoS ONE 8(1): e53041. Gluesenkamp, A. 2011a. Personal communication. Presentation to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. September 12, 2011. Austin, Texas. Gluesenkamp, A. 2011b. Personal communication. Phone conversation with Erik Orsak, Arlington Ecological Services Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. August 20, 2011. 3 pp. Heger, T. 2012a. Personal communication. Email from Tom Heger Texas Parks and Wildlife Department to Alisa Shull, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Re: Salado salamander site. February 2, 2012. Heger, T. 2012b. Personal communication. Email from Tom Heger Texas Parks and Wildlife Department to Joshua Booker, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Re: Update on Salado Spring citation. May 16, 2012. Hillis, D.M., Chamberlain, D.A., Wilcox, T.P. and P.T. Chippindale. 2001. A new species of subterranean blind salamander (Plethodontidae: Hemidactyliini: Eurycea: Typhlomolge) from Austin, Texas, and nomenclature of the major clades of central Texas paedomorphic salamanders. Herpetologica 53: 266-280. Hunter, J. and B. Russell. 1993. Bat Well Cave: August 11, 1992. The Capital Caver 1993(1): 6-8. O’Donnell, L., Turner, M., Sanders, M., Geismar, E., Heilman, S., and L. Zebehazy. 2006. Summary of Jollyville Plateau salamander data (1997-2006). City of Austin Watershed and Development Review Department. December 2006. 50 pp. Pierce, B., and A. Wall. 2011. Review of research literature related to the biology, evolution, and conservation of Georgetown salamander, Eurycea naufragia. Report to the Williamson County Conservation Foundation, Southwestern University, Georgetown, Texas. 40 pp. Pierce, B, J.L. Christiansen, A.L. Ritzer, and T.A. Jones. 2010. Ecology of Georgetown salamanders (Eurycea naufragia) within the flow of a spring. The Southwestern Naturalist 55: 291-297. Pierce, B., K.D. McEntire, and A.E. Wall. 2013. Summary of research on movement of the Georgetown salamander (Eurycea naufragia) within two surface springs in Williamson County, TX. Report submitted to the Williamson County Conservation Foundation. 8 pp. Russell, W.H. 1993. The Buttercup Creek karst, Travis and Williamson counties, Texas: Geology, biology, and land development. Report prepared for the University Speleological Society at the University of Texas. 76 pp. SWCA (SWCA Environmental Consultants). 2012. Technical response to USFWS proposed rule for endangered status for four central Texas salamanders and designation of critical habitat (77 FR ge50768). Prepared for Williamson County Conservation Foundation. October 22, 2012. 218 pp. Sweet, S. 1978. The evolutionary development of the Texas Eurycea (Amphibia: Plethodontidae). PhD dissertation. University of California, Berkeley. 462 pp. TPWD (Texas Parks and Wildlife Department). 2011. Letter to Alisa Shull, in response to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service request for information on the status and threats to Salado salamander (Eurycea chisholmensis), Georgetown salamander (E. naufragia), Jollyville Plateau salamander (E. tonkawae), and Austin blind salamander (E. waterlooensis). October 18, 2011. 19 pp. Turner, M. 2009. Barton Springs salamanders, spring discharge, and dissolved oxygen. City of Austin Watershed Protection. SR-04-06. 16 pp. Warton, M. 1997. Final Report: A study of cave habitats, point recharge potential, and associated karst lands of the Buttercup creek development properties, including Buttercup creek section 4 and phase v Cedar Park, Williamson County, Texas. Prepared for Lumdermen’s Investment Corporation. October 18, 1997. 240 pp. Wenger, S.J. 2008. Use of surrogates to predict the stressor response of imperiled species. Conservation Biology 22 (6): 1564-1571. Willson, J.D., and M.E. Dorcas. 2003. Effects of habitat disturbance on stream salamanders: implications for buffer zones and watershed management. Conservation Biology 17: 763-771. Woods H.A. and M.F. Poteet. 2006. Physiological and behavioral responses of Eurycea sosorum to variation in levels of conductivity. Technical progress report #2: August 28, 2006. University of Texas at Austin, Texas. 65 pp. Woods H.A., Poteet, M.F., Hitchings, P.D., Brian, R.A., and B.W. Brooks. 2010. Conservation physiology of the plethodontid salamanders Eurycea nana and E. sosorum: response to declining dissolved oxygen. Copeia 4: 540-553. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2020–0048; FF09E21000 FXES11110900000 201]
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 09/15/2020 and available online at federalregister.gov/d/2020-17921, and on govinfo.gov Billing Code 4333–15 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 [Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2020–0048; FF09E21000 FXES11110900000 201] RIN 1018–BE78 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for the Georgetown and Salado Salamanders AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Proposed rule; revisions and reopening of comment period. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), are revising our proposed designation of critical habitat for the Georgetown salamander (Eurycea naufragia) and Salado salamander (Eurycea chisholmensis) in Bell and Williamson Counties, Texas. Based on published genetic analyses, we are revising the distribution of the Georgetown and Salado salamanders and are adjusting previously proposed critical habitat units accordingly. We also propose changes to our description of the physical or biological features essential to the conservation of the species. We propose a total of approximately 1,519 acres (ac) (622 hectares (ha)) of critical habitat for the species in Bell and Williamson Counties, Texas. The total amount of critical habitat we are proposing for both salamanders has increased by approximately 116 ac (47 ha). The reasons for this increase are the addition of a new occupied site for the Salado salamander and refined mapping of previously proposed critical habitat units based on more precise spring locations. We also announce the availability of a draft economic analysis (DEA) of the revised proposed designation of critical habitat for the Georgetown and Salado salamanders.
    [Show full text]
  • Salado Residents Want Better Science on Salamander
    Shopping Map of Salado on pages 4B-5B Salado illageillage oiceoice VOL. XXXV, NUMBER 9V TVHUrsDAY, JUNE 21, 2012 254/947-5321 FAX 254/947-9479 V V WWW.SALADOVILLAGEVOICE.COM 50¢ Residents want better science on salamander BY TIM FLEISCHER of the Salado Creek water- line the approach to the EDITOR-IN-CHIEF shed and the water quality $60,000 year-long study and water quantity of the and to introduce the prin- As traffic on Highway habitat of the Salado sala- cipal scientists who will be 45 in Round Rock roared mander. gathering data in the com- overhead, Congressman Neither of these efforts ing months. John Carter announced are likely to impact the Meanwhile, the U.S. at a June 18 press confer- pending decision by the Fish and Wildlife Service ence his plans to attach an U.S. Fish and Wildlife Ser- (FWS) is slated to an- amendment to the Interior vice to add the Salado sala- nounce whether the four and Environment Appro- mander as an Endangered species of salamanders in priations Bill that would species. Bell, Williamson and Tra- strip any funding “to ad- While Rep. Carter said vis counties will be listed vance or pursue adding any he will propose the House as endangered. The dead- of the population of blind bill amendment within a line for FWS to propose salamanders of Salado, week, the Appropriations those species for listing is Jollyville Plateau, George- bill has many hurdles to Sept. 30. The schedule for town or Austin, Texas, to pass. First, it has to get out listing the salamander spe- the list of endangered spe- of Appropriations com- cies is part of a settlement cies or as a threatened spe- mittee (with the amend- between USFWS and the cies under the Endangered ment in place) and to the Center for Biological Di- Species Act of 1973.” House floor.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Factors Potentially Affecting Eurycea Naufragia
    Report to the Williamson County Conservation Foundation Review of Research Literature Related to the Biology, Evolution, and Conservation of Georgetown Salamander, Eurycea naufragia Benjamin A. Pierce and Ashley Wall Department of Biology Southwestern University Georgetown, Texas 78626 June 22, 2011 1 The Georgetown Salamander The Georgetown salamander, Eurycea naufragia, is a spring and cave-dwelling salamander restricted to the San Gabriel River drainage of Williamson County, Texas. The species is known from only 15 sites occurring along the major tributaries of the upper San Gabriel River (South, Middle, and North forks and Berry Creek; Figure 1). At some of these sites, salamanders have not been observed in recent years and access to all sites is not available. All but two of the known sites are on privately-owned land. The entire range of the species occurs within the immediate vicinity of Georgetown, Texas, an area that is undergoing rapid urbanization (Figure 2), and nearly all known populations are at risk from urban development. The Georgetown salamander has been included as a candidate for listing as an endangered species (US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2001) but is not currently protected by federal or state regulation. Candidate species are given a priority listing by the US Fish and Wildlife Service, which ranges from 1 to 12 and indicates the magnitude and immediacy of threats they face and their taxonomic uniqueness, with higher priority assigned to lower numbers. Largely because of the implementation of the Williamson County Regional Habitat Conservation Plan, the US Fish and Wildlife Service in 2008 reduced the listing priority number of the Georgetown salamander from 2 to 8 (US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Common and Current Scientific Names for North American Amphibians, Turtles, Reptiles & Crocodilians
    STANDARD COMMON AND CURRENT SCIENTIFIC NAMES FOR NORTH AMERICAN AMPHIBIANS, TURTLES, REPTILES & CROCODILIANS Sixth Edition Joseph T. Collins TraVis W. TAGGart The Center for North American Herpetology THE CEN T ER FOR NOR T H AMERI ca N HERPE T OLOGY www.cnah.org Joseph T. Collins, Director The Center for North American Herpetology 1502 Medinah Circle Lawrence, Kansas 66047 (785) 393-4757 Single copies of this publication are available gratis from The Center for North American Herpetology, 1502 Medinah Circle, Lawrence, Kansas 66047 USA; within the United States and Canada, please send a self-addressed 7x10-inch manila envelope with sufficient U.S. first class postage affixed for four ounces. Individuals outside the United States and Canada should contact CNAH via email before requesting a copy. A list of previous editions of this title is printed on the inside back cover. THE CEN T ER FOR NOR T H AMERI ca N HERPE T OLOGY BO A RD OF DIRE ct ORS Joseph T. Collins Suzanne L. Collins Kansas Biological Survey The Center for The University of Kansas North American Herpetology 2021 Constant Avenue 1502 Medinah Circle Lawrence, Kansas 66047 Lawrence, Kansas 66047 Kelly J. Irwin James L. Knight Arkansas Game & Fish South Carolina Commission State Museum 915 East Sevier Street P. O. Box 100107 Benton, Arkansas 72015 Columbia, South Carolina 29202 Walter E. Meshaka, Jr. Robert Powell Section of Zoology Department of Biology State Museum of Pennsylvania Avila University 300 North Street 11901 Wornall Road Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Kansas City, Missouri 64145 Travis W. Taggart Sternberg Museum of Natural History Fort Hays State University 3000 Sternberg Drive Hays, Kansas 67601 Front cover images of an Eastern Collared Lizard (Crotaphytus collaris) and Cajun Chorus Frog (Pseudacris fouquettei) by Suzanne L.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Title
    COOPERATIVE ENDANGERED SPECIES CONSERVATION FUND: HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (HCP) PLANNING ASSISTANCE Fiscal Year: 2021 F21AS00171 Amending Williamson County Regional Habitat Conservation Plan to Cover Six Additional Species Benefitting: Georgetown Salamander (Eurycea naufragia) Salado Salamander (Eurycea chisholmensis) Jollyville Plateau Salamander (Eurycea tonkawae) Tooth Cave Spider (Tayshaneta myopica) Dragonfly Cave Mold Beetle (Batrisodes cryptotexanus) Monarch Butterfly (Danaus plexippus plexippus) Submitted by: Williamson County, Texas and Williamson County Conservation Foundation To Revise: HCP permit # TE-181840-1 57899776.v2 PROJECT CONTACTS Gary Boyd Rebecca Hays Barho Project Director Nossaman LLP Williamson County Conservation Foundation 816 Congress Ave., Ste. 970 219 Perry Mayfield Austin, Texas 78701 Leander, Texas 78641 Tel: (512) 813-7942 Tel: (512) 943-1921 [email protected] [email protected] Steve Carothers, Ph.D. Kemble White, Ph.D. SWCA Environmental Consultants Cambrian Environmental 4407 Monterey Oaks Blvd. 4422 Pack Saddle Pass, Suite 204 Austin, Texas 78749 Austin, TX 78745 Tel: (512) 476-0891 Tel: (512) 663-0156 [email protected] [email protected] PROJECT NARRATIVE This Project Narrative includes the information necessary to address the grant eligibility and evaluation, consistent with the requirements provided in the Notice of Funding Opportunity specific to the Cooperative Endangered Species Conservation Fund: HCP Planning Assistance, Fiscal Year 2021, Funding Opportunity Number F21AS00171
    [Show full text]
  • Georgetown Salamander, Eurycea Naufragia
    Herpetological Conservation and Biology 9(1):137−145. Submitted: 8 August 2013; Accepted: 24 February 2014; Published: 13 July 2014. POPULATION SIZE, MOVEMENT, AND REPRODUCTION OF THE GEORGETOWN SALAMANDER, EURYCEA NAUFRAGIA 1 2 3 BENJAMIN A. PIERCE , KIRA D. MCENTIRE , AND ASHLEY E. WALL 1Department of Biology, Southwestern University, Georgetown, Texas 78626, USA, e-mail: [email protected] 2Current Address: D.B. Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA 3Department of Biology, Texas Christian University, Ft. Worth, Texas 76129, USA Abstract.—Salamanders are important components of many headwater stream and spring habitats and may be important indicators of ecosystem health. At least 15 recognized species of endemic salamanders of the genus Eurycea occur on the Edwards Plateau of central Texas, US A. The Georg etown Salamander (Eurycea naufragia) is a neotenic, spring- and cave-dwelling species found only in the San Gabriel River watershed of Williamson County, Texas, an area undergoing rapid urbanization. In spite of conservation concern, lit tle research has been conducted on the species and informatio n critical for conservation planning is unavailable. In this study, we used visual implant elastomers and mark-recapture methods to provide the first population estimates for the species, revealing small populations at two springs. Based on 24 months of recapture survey s, we found limited movement of E. naufragia within individual springs. Over a period of three years, we checked salamanders for the presence of eggs and observed seasonal reproduction with bimodal peaks in winter and early spring. Measurements of gravid individuals suggest female reproductive maturity occurs around 26 to 28 mm head-trunk length.
    [Show full text]
  • SERDP Project ER18-1653
    FINAL REPORT Approach for Assessing PFAS Risk to Threatened and Endangered Species SERDP Project ER18-1653 MARCH 2020 Craig Divine, Ph.D. Jean Zodrow, Ph.D. Meredith Frenchmeyer Katie Dally Erin Osborn, Ph.D. Paul Anderson, Ph.D. Arcadis US Inc. Distribution Statement A Page Intentionally Left Blank This report was prepared under contract to the Department of Defense Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP). The publication of this report does not indicate endorsement by the Department of Defense, nor should the contents be construed as reflecting the official policy or position of the Department of Defense. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the Department of Defense. Page Intentionally Left Blank Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number.
    [Show full text]
  • DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 01/13/2016 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2016-00452, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 16 RIN 1018–BA77 [Docket No. FWS–HQ–FAC–2015–0005] [FXFR13360900000–156–FF09F14000] Injurious Wildlife Species; Listing Salamanders Due to Risk of Salamander Chytrid Fungus AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Interim rule; request for comments; notice of availability of economic analysis. 1 SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is amending its regulations under the Lacey Act to add all species of salamanders from 20 genera, of which there are 201 species, to the list of injurious amphibians. With this interim rule, both importation into the United States and interstate transportation between States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any territory or possession of the United States of any live or dead specimen, including parts, of these 20 genera of salamanders are prohibited, except by permit for zoological, educational, medical, or scientific purposes (in accordance with permit conditions) or by Federal agencies without a permit solely for their own use. This action is necessary to protect the interests of wildlife and wildlife resources from the introduction, establishment, and spread of the chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans into ecosystems of the United States. The fungus affects salamanders, with lethal effects on many species, and is not yet known to be found in the United States. Because of the devastating effect that we expect the fungus will have on native U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Parcas Criteria and Implementation Plan Here!
    Model Criteria and Implementation Guidance for a Priority Amphibian and Reptile Conservation Area (PARCA) System in the U.S.A. V.4 October 2012 PARCA Task Team Prepared by Ron Sutherland and Phillip deMaynadier In collaboration with National PARC’s "Priority Amphibian and Reptile Conservation Areas" Task Team: Co-Leads: Ron Sutherland , Wildlands Network Phillip deMaynadier, Maine Dept. of Inland Fisheries & Wildlife Team Members: Margaret Trani Griep, U.S. Forest Service Southern Region Audrey Hatch, formerly Oregon Dept. of Fish and Wildlife Randy Jennings, Western New Mexico University Karen Kinkead , Iowa Dept. of Natural Resources Priya Nanjappa, Assoc. of Fish & Wildlife Agencies Cover Photographs: Blanding’s Turtle (Emydoidea blandingii) – J. Mays Coastal Tailed Frog (Ascaphus truei) – B. McCreary Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchon couperi) – J.D. Willson Blue-spotted Salamander (Ambystoma laterale) – L. Kenney Reticulate Gila Monster (Heloderma s. suspectum) – K. Stohlgren Suggested citation: R. Sutherland and P. deMaynadier. 2012. Model Criteria and Implementation Guidance for a Priority Amphibian and Reptile Conservation Area (PARCA) System in the USA. Partners in Amphibian and Reptile Conservation, Technical Publication PARCA-1. 28 pp. 2 V.4 October 2012 PARCA Task Team Contents: Acknowledgments ………………………………………………………………………….....................…...3 Introduction…………..……. ……………………………………………………………………………………3 Criteria for PARCA Selection…………………… …………………………………………………………5 Criteria Overview and PARCA Scale.............……………………………………………………….…..8
    [Show full text]
  • FEIS Citation Retrieval System Keywords
    FEIS Citation Retrieval System Keywords 29,958 entries as KEYWORD (PARENT) Descriptive phrase AB (CANADA) Alberta ABEESC (PLANTS) Abelmoschus esculentus, okra ABEGRA (PLANTS) Abelia × grandiflora [chinensis × uniflora], glossy abelia ABERT'S SQUIRREL (MAMMALS) Sciurus alberti ABERT'S TOWHEE (BIRDS) Pipilo aberti ABIABI (BRYOPHYTES) Abietinella abietina, abietinella moss ABIALB (PLANTS) Abies alba, European silver fir ABIAMA (PLANTS) Abies amabilis, Pacific silver fir ABIBAL (PLANTS) Abies balsamea, balsam fir ABIBIF (PLANTS) Abies bifolia, subalpine fir ABIBRA (PLANTS) Abies bracteata, bristlecone fir ABICON (PLANTS) Abies concolor, white fir ABICONC (ABICON) Abies concolor var. concolor, white fir ABICONL (ABICON) Abies concolor var. lowiana, Rocky Mountain white fir ABIDUR (PLANTS) Abies durangensis, Coahuila fir ABIES SPP. (PLANTS) firs ABIETINELLA SPP. (BRYOPHYTES) Abietinella spp., mosses ABIFIR (PLANTS) Abies firma, Japanese fir ABIFRA (PLANTS) Abies fraseri, Fraser fir ABIGRA (PLANTS) Abies grandis, grand fir ABIHOL (PLANTS) Abies holophylla, Manchurian fir ABIHOM (PLANTS) Abies homolepis, Nikko fir ABILAS (PLANTS) Abies lasiocarpa, subalpine fir ABILASA (ABILAS) Abies lasiocarpa var. arizonica, corkbark fir ABILASB (ABILAS) Abies lasiocarpa var. bifolia, subalpine fir ABILASL (ABILAS) Abies lasiocarpa var. lasiocarpa, subalpine fir ABILOW (PLANTS) Abies lowiana, Rocky Mountain white fir ABIMAG (PLANTS) Abies magnifica, California red fir ABIMAGM (ABIMAG) Abies magnifica var. magnifica, California red fir ABIMAGS (ABIMAG) Abies
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACTS 29 Reptile Ecology I, Highland A, Sunday 15 July 2018
    THE JOINT MEETING OF ASIH SSAR HL lcHTHYOLOGISTS & HERPETOLOGISTS ROCHESTER, NEW YORK 2018 ABSTRACTS 29 Reptile Ecology I, Highland A, Sunday 15 July 2018 Curtis Abney, Glenn Tattersall and Anne Yagi Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada Thermal Preference and Habitat Selection of Thamnophis sirtalis sirtalis in a Southern Ontario Peatland Gartersnakes represent the most widespread reptile in North America. Despite occupying vastly different biogeoclimatic zones across their range, evidence suggests that the thermal preferenda (Tset) of gartersnakes has not diverged significantly between populations or different Thamnophis species. The reason behind gartersnake success could lie in their flexible thermoregulatory behaviours and habitat selection. We aimed to investigate this relationship by first identifying the Tset of a common gartersnake species (Thamnophis sirtalis sirtalis) via a thermal gradient. We then used this Tset parameter as a baseline for calculating the thermal quality of an open, mixed, and forested habitat all used by the species. We measured the thermal profiles of these habitats by installing a series of temperature-recording analogues that mimicked the reflectance and morphology of living gartersnakes and recorded environmental temperatures as living snakes experience them. Lastly, we used coverboards to survey the current habitat usage of T. s. sirtalis. Of the three habitats, we found that the open habitat offered the highest thermal quality throughout the snake’s active season. In contrast, we recorded the greatest number of snakes using the mixed habitat which had considerably lower thermal quality. Although the open habitat offered the greatest thermal quality, we regularly recorded temperatures exceeding the upper range of the animals’ thermal preference.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction •Graphs / Facts •Solution •Conclusion •Causes •Photos •Acknowledgements •About This Amazing Creatu
    •Axolotls and the Environment •by Sharel Gaskey •Introduction •Problem •Graphs / Facts •Solution •Every one organism affects our future and our environment’s •Many salamander species in Mexico and Guatemala •Make a sanctuary and maybe a man made lake in a future! When one group of organisms die off another group have suffered dramatic population declines since the better spot. Reintroduction of lab bred axolotls might also might die unless they can rely on one another for food. 1970s, driven to the brink probably by a warming not be a good idea. A pilot sanctuary is planned to When an animal becomes extinct our whole world’s future climate and other factors. Two of the most common open in Mexico City in 2009. changes because it has to adapt to the loss. There are many species of salamanders in the areas 40 years ago are types of animals that need our help to survive. They are in extinct, and several others have experienced large •The federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) this situation because sometimes we as humans are causing drops in number. All around the world human (16 U.S.C.A. §§ 1531 et seq.) was enacted to protect the problem. There are many extinct and endangered animals influences have changed the environment. animal and plant species from extinction by preserving at the moment, but right now one specific animal is going to •In Ten Years the Amount Per Square foot went the ecosystems in which they survive and by providing be the focus, The Axolotl. The Axolotl is related to the Tiger from about 1000 to 25.
    [Show full text]