DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix E Cultural Resources Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix E Cultural Resources Assessment NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT DRAFT EIR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Appendices Appendix E Cultural Resources Assessment March 2014 PlaceWorks NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT DRAFT EIR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Appendices This page intentionally left blank. PlaceWorks March 2014 CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE NEWPORT LAND USE ELEMENT, CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA CONFIDENTIAL VERSION FOR PLANNING USE ONLY -NOT SUITABLE FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION- Prepared for: The Planning Center|DC&E 3 MacArthur Place, Suite 1100 Santa Ana, CA 92707 Authors: Molly Valasik, Sherri Gust and Courtney Richards Principal Investigator: Sherri Gust, Orange County Certified Professional Paleontologist and Archaeologist February 2014 Project Number: 2739 Type of Study: Cultural resources programmatic assessment USGS 7.5’ Quadrangle: Newport Beach, Tustin, Laguna Beach Area: 33,920 acres Key Words: Gabrielino, Tongva, Young Quaternary Deposits, Old Quaternary Deposits, Niguel Formation, Capistrano Formation, Monterey Formation; San Onofre Breccia, Topanga Group, intrusive volcanic rock, Vaqueros Formation 1518 West Taft Avenue Field Offices cogstone.com Orange, CA 92865 San Diego • Riverside • Canyon Country Toll free (888) 497-0700 Office (714) 974-8300 • Morro Bay • West Sacramento Federal Certifications 8(a), SDB, 8(m) WOSB State Certifications DBE, WBE, SBE, UDBE E-1 Newport LUE TABLE OF CONTENTS MANAGEMENT SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................ IV INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 PURPOSE OF STUDY ................................................................................................................................................... 1 PROJECT LOCATION ................................................................................................................................................... 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................................................................. 9 PROJECT PERSONNEL ................................................................................................................................................. 9 REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT ......................................................................................................................... 14 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT OF 1970, AS AMENDED .................................................................... 14 CALIFORNIA REGISTER OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES ............................................................................................... 14 DEFINITION OF SIGNIFICANCE FOR PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ....................................................................... 15 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................................................ 16 GEOLOGICAL SETTING ............................................................................................................................................. 16 STRATIGRAPHY ........................................................................................................................................................ 16 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ...................................................................................................................................... 21 PREHISTORIC SETTING ............................................................................................................................................. 21 PREHISTORIC CULTURES .......................................................................................................................................... 22 ETHNOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................................................................ 25 Gabrielino Tongva ............................................................................................................................................. 25 HISTORICAL SETTING .............................................................................................................................................. 27 Project Area History .......................................................................................................................................... 29 LITERATURE REVIEW AND RECORD SEARCHES ....................................................................................... 30 PALEONTOLOGY ...................................................................................................................................................... 30 ARCHAEOLOGY AND HISTORY ................................................................................................................................. 35 OTHER SOURCES ...................................................................................................................................................... 35 NATIVE AMERICAN CONSULTATION ......................................................................................................................... 38 IMPACT ANALYSIS AND MITIGATION ............................................................................................................ 38 IMPACTS .................................................................................................................................................................. 38 MITIGATION MEASURES ........................................................................................................................................... 40 REFERENCES CITED ............................................................................................................................................. 41 APPENDIX A: QUALIFICATIONS ...................................................................................................................... 43 APPENDIX B: PALEONTOLOGY RECORDS SEARCH .................................................................................. 47 APPENDIX C: PREVIOUS CULTURAL RESOURCES STUDIES .................................................................. 59 APPENDIX D: PREVIOUSLY RECORDED CULTURAL RESOURCES ..................................................... 124 APPENDIX E: CONFIDENTIAL MAP OF SUBAREA SITES ......................................................................... 140 APPENDIX F: LAND PATENTS ......................................................................................................................... 143 APPENDIX G: NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION .............................................................. 146 Cogstone ii E-2 Newport LUE List of Figures FIGURE 1. PROJECT VICINITY ......................................................................................................................................... 2 FIGURE 2A. PROJECT AREA, OVERVIEW MAP ................................................................................................................ 3 FIGURE 2B. PROJECT AREA, MAP 1 ................................................................................................................................ 4 FIGURE 2C. PROJECT AREA, MAP 2 ................................................................................................................................ 5 FIGURE 2D. PROJECT AREA, MAP 3 ............................................................................................................................... 6 FIGURE 2E. PROJECT AREA, MAP 4 ................................................................................................................................ 7 FIGURE 2F. PROJECT AREA, MAP 5 ................................................................................................................................ 8 FIGURE 3. PROPOSED AREAS OF CHANGE ..................................................................................................................... 13 FIGURE 4. GEOLOGY MAP ........................................................................................................................................... 20 FIGURE 5. NATIVE AMERICAN TRADITIONAL TRIBAL TERRITORIES ............................................................................. 26 FIGURE 6. GABRIELINO/TONGVA VILLAGES ................................................................................................................ 27 FIGURE 7. LAND GRANT MAP ....................................................................................................................................... 28 FIGURE 8. MCFADDEN’S WHARF IN 1901 .................................................................................................................... 30 FIGURE 9. PALEONTOLOGICAL SENSITIVITY ................................................................................................................ 39 List of Tables TABLE 1. NEWPORT BEACH STUDY AREA LOCATIONS .................................................................................................. 1 TABLE 2. PROPOSED LAND USE CHANGES ................................................................................................................... 10 TABLE 3. CULTURAL PATTERNS AND PHASES ............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Shark-Toothed Dolphin Squalodon Cetacea
    Carnets Geol. 20 (2) E-ISSN 1634-0744 DOI 10.4267/2042/70716 The shark-toothed dolphin Squalodon (Cetacea: Odontoceti) from the remarkable Montagna della Majella marine vertebrate assemblage (Bolognano Formation, central Italy) Alberto COLLARETA 1 Andrea DI CENCIO 2 Renato RICCI 3 Giovanni BIANUCCI 4 Abstract: The extinct family Squalodontidae consists of heterodont, medium-sized odontocetes, featu- ring a long rostrum that houses large, procumbent incisors and heavily ornamented postcanine teeth carrying accessory denticles, hence their vernacular name, "shark-toothed dolphins". These longirostri- ne toothed whales are often seen as bridging the anatomical gap between archaic Oligocene odontoce- tes and their late Miocene to Holocene relatives. Possibly among the major marine predators of their ti- me, the shark-toothed dolphins are important components of several lower Miocene marine-mammal assemblages from the North Atlantic and Mediterranean/Paratethysian realms. In the present work, a partial skull of Squalodontidae is described from the strata of the Bolognano Formation cropping out in the northeastern sector of the Montagna della Majella massif (Abruzzo, central Italy), which has pre- viously yielded a rich lower Miocene marine-vertebrate assemblage, including eleven taxa of elasmo- branchs as well as subordinate teleosts and very fragmentary remains of marine reptiles and mam- mals. The specimen consists of the anterodorsal portion of a rostrum, preserving parts of both pre- maxillae and left maxilla, and the anteriormost seven upper left teeth. This partial skull is here identi- fied as belonging to the genus Squalodon, whose presence in the Montagna della Majella vertebrate assemblage had already been tentatively proposed on the basis of two fragmentary teeth.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Population Structure of the Pacific Angel Shark (Squatina Californica) Along the Northwestern Coast of Mexico Based on T
    Ciencias Marinas ISSN: 0185-3880 [email protected] Universidad Autónoma de Baja California México Ramírez-Amaro, Sergio; Ramírez-Macías, Dení; Vázquez-Juárez, Ricardo; Flores- Ramírez, Sergio; Galván-Magaña, Felipe; Gutiérrez-Rivera, Jesús N. Population structure of the Pacific angel shark (Squatina californica) along the northwestern coast of Mexico based on the mitochondrial DNA control region Ciencias Marinas, vol. 43, núm. 1, 2017, pp. 69-80 Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Ensenada, México Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=48050568004 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Ciencias Marinas (2017), 43(1): 69–80 http://dx.doi.org/10.7773/cm.v43i1.2692 Population structure of the Pacific angel shark (Squatina californica) along the northwestern coast of Mexico based on the mitochondrial DNA control region Estructura poblacional del tiburón ángel del Pacífico (Squatina californica) a lo largo de la costa noroccidental de México con base en la regíon control del ADN mitocondrial Sergio Ramírez-Amaro1, Dení Ramírez-Macías2, Ricardo Vázquez-Juárez3*, Sergio Flores-Ramírez4, Felipe Galván-Magaña5, Jesús N Gutiérrez-Rivera3 1 Universitat de les Illes Balears, Laboratori de Genètica, Carretera de Valldemossa km 7.5, 07122, Palma de Mallorca, Spain. 2 Tiburón Ballena México de ConCIENCIA México, Manatí 4, no. 802, colonia Esperanza III, CP 23090, La Paz, Baja California Sur, México. 3 Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, Mar Bermejo 195, colonia Playa Palo de Santa Rita Sur, CP 23096, La Paz, Baja California Sur, México.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Palaeontology
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2015 Palaeontology Klug, Christian ; Scheyer, Torsten M ; Cavin, Lionel Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-113739 Conference or Workshop Item Presentation Originally published at: Klug, Christian; Scheyer, Torsten M; Cavin, Lionel (2015). Palaeontology. In: Swiss Geoscience Meeting, Basel, 20 November 2015 - 21 November 2015. 136 4. Palaeontology Christian Klug, Torsten Scheyer, Lionel Cavin Schweizerische Paläontologische Gesellschaft, Kommission des Schweizerischen Paläontologischen Abhandlungen (KSPA) Symposium 4: Palaeontology TALKS: 4.1 Aguirre-Fernández G., Jost J.: Re-evaluation of the fossil cetaceans from Switzerland 4.2 Costeur L., Mennecart B., Schmutz S., Métais G.: Palaeomeryx (Mammalia, Artiodactyla) and the giraffes, data from the ear region 4.3 Foth C., Hedrick B.P., Ezcurra M.D.: Ontogenetic variation and heterochronic processes in the cranial evolution of early saurischians 4.4 Frey L., Rücklin M., Kindlimann R., Klug C.: Alpha diversity and palaeoecology of a Late Devonian Fossillagerstätte from Morocco and its exceptionally preserved fish fauna 4.5 Joyce W.G., Rabi M.: A Revised Global Biogeography of Turtles 4.6 Klug C., Frey L., Rücklin M.: A Famennian Fossillagerstätte in the eastern Anti-Atlas of Morocco: its fauna and taphonomy 4.7 Leder R.M.: Morphometric analysis of teeth of fossil and recent carcharhinid selachiens
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal for Inclusion of the Angelshark
    CMS Distribution: General CONVENTION ON UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.1.23 MIGRATORY 6 June 2017 SPECIES Original: English 12th MEETING OF THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES Manila, Philippines, 23 - 28 October 2017 Agenda Item 25.1. PROPOSAL FOR THE INCLUSION OF THE ANGELSHARK (Squatina squatina) ON APPENDIX I AND II OF THE CONVENTION Summary: The Government of Monaco has submitted the attached proposal* for the inclusion of the Angelshark (Squatina squatina) on Appendix I and II of CMS. *The geographical designations employed in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the CMS Secretariat (or the United Nations Environment Programme) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The responsibility for the contents of the document rests exclusively with its author. UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.1.23 PROPOSAL FOR THE INCLUSION OF THE ANGELSHARK (Squatina squatina) ON THE APPENDICES OF THE CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF MIGRATORY SPECIES OF WILD ANIMALS A. PROPOSAL: Inclusion of the species Squatina squatina, Angelshark, in Appendix I and II. B. PROPONENT: Government of the Principality of Monaco C. SUPPORTING STATEMENT 1. Taxonomy 1.1 Class: Chondrichthyes, subclass Elasmobranchii 1.2 Order: Squatiniformes 1.3 Family: S quatinidae 1.4 Genus, species: Squatina squatina Linnaeus, 1758 1.5 Scientific synonyms 1.6 Common Name: English: Angelshark, common or European Angelshark, angel ray, shark ray, monkfish French: Ange de mer commun, L'angelot, Spanish: Angelote, Peje angel, tiburón angel German: Meerengel, Engelhai, Gemeiner Meerengel Italian: Angelu, Pesce angelo, Squatru cefalu, Terrezzino Portuguese: Anjo, Peixe anjo, Viola 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the United States National Museum
    DESCRIPTION OF TWO SQUALODONTS RECENTLY DIS- COVERED IN THE CALVERT CLIFFS, ^LVRYLAND; AND NOTES ON THE SHARK-TOOTHED CETACEANS. By Remington Kellogg, Of the Bureau of Biological Survey, United States Departynent of Agriculture. INTRODUCTION. When the study of paleontology was less advanced than it is at present, any announcement of the discovery of prehistoric animals unlike the living indigenous fauna was usually received with some suspicion. In spite of this distrust, many attempts were made by the early writers to explain the presence of fossil remains of marine mammals in strata above the sea level or at some distance from the seashore. In one of these treatises ' is found what is, apparently, the first notice of the occurrence of fossil remains referable to shark- toothed cetaceans. The author of this work figures a fragment of a mandible, obtained from the tufa of Malta, which possesses three serrate double-rooted molar teeth. Squalodonts as such were first brought to the attention of ]mleon- tologists in 1840, by J. P. S. Grateloup, ' a French naturalist primarily interested in marine invertebrates. In the original description of Squalodon, Grateloup held the view that this rostral fragment from Leognan, France, belonged to some large saurian related to Iguanodon. Following the anouncement of this discovery. Von Meyer ^ called at- tention to the teeth of this fossil, and concluded that the specimen was referable to some flesh-eating cetacean. A year later, Grateloup* concurred in this opinion. One other specimen should be mentioned in this connection, but, unfortunately, its relationships are quite uncer- tain. This specimen consists of a single tooth which was thought to bear resemblance to some pinniped by Von Meyer ^ and named Pachy- odon mirahilis.
    [Show full text]
  • Length at Maturity of the Pacific Angel Shark (Squatina Californica) in the Artisanal Elasmobranch Fishery in the Gulf Of
    359 National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin First U.S. Commissioner established in 1881 of Fisheries and founder NOAA of Fishery Bulletin Abstract—Median length at maturity Length at maturity of the Pacific angel was determined for Pacific angel sharks (Squatina californica) captured inciden- shark (Squatina californica) in the artisanal tally in the artisanal elasmobranch fish- ery in the Gulf of California in Mexico. elasmobranch fishery in the Gulf A total of 306 Pacific angel sharks (192 of California in Mexico females and 114 males) were analyzed. The size of the females ranged between 23 and 100 cm total length (TL), J. Fernando Márquez-Farías whereas males ranged between 25 and 99 cm TL. The maturity stages of both Email address for contact author: [email protected] females and males were determined by using the development of internal and Facultad de Ciencias del Mar external organs. The results of analysis Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa of covariance reveal a significant effect Paseo Claussen s/n of sex (P<0.001) on length at maturity. A Col. Los Pinos binary logistic regression was applied for 82000 Mazatlán, Sinaloa, Mexico each sex to estimate the length at which half of the individuals were consid- ered mature (L50). For females, L50 was 74.41 cm TL (95% confidence interval [CI]: 72.81–76.00 cm TL), and the steep- ness coefficient (Φ) was 1.43 (95% CI: 0.84–2.42). For males, L50 was 77.82 cm The Pacific angel shark (Squatina Peninsula (BCP) in Mexico . Biological TL (95% CI: 75.66–79.97 cm TL), and californica) belongs to the family Squa- information about the Pacific angel the Φ was 3.08 (95% CI: 1.98–4.77).
    [Show full text]
  • Whale Evolution: a Whale of a Tale
    Creation Research Society Quarterly 2012. 49:122–134. 122 Creation Research Society Quarterly Whale Evolution: A Whale of a Tale Jerry Bergman* Abstract review of the evolution of whales from terrestrial land animals finds A that the evidence used to support the current theory is either wrong or very questionable. A focus is on the hip bone and fetal teeth evidence because they are commonly used as proof for the land mammal-to-whale evolution theory. The putative fossil evidence for whale evolution from terrestrial animals is also evaluated, concluding that the examples used are likely all extinct mammals and not transitional forms. Introduction be only about 20 feet long, but baleen A major problem has been deter- The term “whale” is a common noun and blue whales can grow up to 100 feet mining which terrestrial animal whales that can refer to all marine mammals long. Toothed whales are, on average, evolved from. Charles Darwin proposed called cetaceans (members of order smaller then baleen whales, ranging one of the first theories of whale evolu- cetacea), including dolphins and por- from 3 to 32 feet long, although most tion, suggesting they evolved from bears. poises. In this paper the term “whales” are from 10 to 30 feet long. Blue whales He wrote, “I can see no difficulty in a excludes both dolphins and porpoises. can weigh up to 150 tons. race of bears being rendered, by natural Classification of whales divides them selection, more and more aquatic in into two groups; toothed whales and their structure and habits, with larger baleen whales, the latter of which use The Origin of Whales and larger mouths, till a creature was large brush-like structures to filter food The evolution of whales is one of the produced as monstrous as a whale” from the ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • Elasmobranch Biodiversity, Conservation and Management Proceedings of the International Seminar and Workshop, Sabah, Malaysia, July 1997
    The IUCN Species Survival Commission Elasmobranch Biodiversity, Conservation and Management Proceedings of the International Seminar and Workshop, Sabah, Malaysia, July 1997 Edited by Sarah L. Fowler, Tim M. Reed and Frances A. Dipper Occasional Paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 25 IUCN The World Conservation Union Donors to the SSC Conservation Communications Programme and Elasmobranch Biodiversity, Conservation and Management: Proceedings of the International Seminar and Workshop, Sabah, Malaysia, July 1997 The IUCN/Species Survival Commission is committed to communicate important species conservation information to natural resource managers, decision-makers and others whose actions affect the conservation of biodiversity. The SSC's Action Plans, Occasional Papers, newsletter Species and other publications are supported by a wide variety of generous donors including: The Sultanate of Oman established the Peter Scott IUCN/SSC Action Plan Fund in 1990. The Fund supports Action Plan development and implementation. To date, more than 80 grants have been made from the Fund to SSC Specialist Groups. The SSC is grateful to the Sultanate of Oman for its confidence in and support for species conservation worldwide. The Council of Agriculture (COA), Taiwan has awarded major grants to the SSC's Wildlife Trade Programme and Conservation Communications Programme. This support has enabled SSC to continue its valuable technical advisory service to the Parties to CITES as well as to the larger global conservation community. Among other responsibilities, the COA is in charge of matters concerning the designation and management of nature reserves, conservation of wildlife and their habitats, conservation of natural landscapes, coordination of law enforcement efforts as well as promotion of conservation education, research and international cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • Database of Bibliography of Living/Fossil
    www.shark-references.com Version 16.01.2018 Bibliography database of living/fossil sharks, rays and chimaeras (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii, Holocephali) Papers of the year 2017 published by Jürgen Pollerspöck, Benediktinerring 34, 94569 Stephansposching, Germany and Nicolas Straube, Munich, Germany ISSN: 2195-6499 DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32409.72801 copyright by the authors 1 please inform us about missing papers: [email protected] www.shark-references.com Version 16.01.2018 Abstract: This paper contains a collection of 817 citations (no conference abstracts) on topics related to extant and extinct Chondrichthyes (sharks, rays, and chimaeras) as well as a list of Chondrichthyan species and hosted parasites newly described in 2017. The list is the result of regular queries in numerous journals, books and online publications. It provides a complete list of publication citations as well as a database report containing rearranged subsets of the list sorted by the keyword statistics, extant and extinct genera and species descriptions from the years 2000 to 2017, list of descriptions of extinct and extant species from 2017, parasitology, reproduction, distribution, diet, conservation, and taxonomy. The paper is intended to be consulted for information. In addition, we provide data information on the geographic and depth distribution of newly described species, i.e. the type specimens from the years 1990 to 2017 in a hot spot analysis. New in this year's POTY is the subheader "biodiversity" comprising a complete list of all valid chimaeriform, selachian and batoid species, as well as a list of the top 20 most researched chondrichthyan species. Please note that the content of this paper has been compiled to the best of our abilities based on current knowledge and practice, however, possible errors cannot entirely be excluded.
    [Show full text]
  • SHARKS an Inquiry Into Biology, Behavior, Fisheries, and Use DATE
    $10.00 SHARKS An Inquiry into Biology, Behavior, Fisheries, and Use DATE. Proceedings of the Conference Portland, Oregon USA / October 13-15,1985 OF OUT IS information: PUBLICATIONcurrent most THIS For EM 8330http://extension.oregonstate.edu/catalog / March 1987 . OREGON STATG UNIVERSITY ^^ GXTENSION S€RVIC€ SHARKS An Inquiry into Biology, Behavior, Fisheries, and Use Proceedings of a Conference Portland, Oregon USA / October 13-15,1985 DATE. Edited by Sid Cook OF Scientist, Argus-Mariner Consulting Scientists OUT Conference Sponsors University of Alaska Sea Grant MarineIS Advisory Program University of Hawaii Sea Grant Extension Service Oregon State University Extension/Sea Grant Program University of Southern California Sea Grant Program University of Washington Sea Grant Marine Advisory Program West Coast Fisheries Development Foundation Argus-Mariner Consulting Scientistsinformation: PUBLICATIONcurrent EM 8330 / March 1987 most THISOregon State University Extension Service For http://extension.oregonstate.edu/catalog TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction, Howard Horton 1 Why, Are We Talking About Sharks? Bob Schoning 3 Shark Biology The Importance of Sharks in Marine Biological Communities Jose Castro.. 11 Estimating Growth and Age in Sharks Gregor Cailliet 19 Telemetering Techniques for Determining Movement Patterns in SharksDATE. abstract Donald Nelson 29 Human Impacts on Shark Populations Thomas Thorson OF 31 Shark Behavior Understanding Shark Behavior Arthur MyrbergOUT 41 The Significance of Sharks in Human Psychology Jon Magnuson 85 Pacific Coast Shark Attacks: What is theIS Danger? abstract Robert Lea... 95 The Forensic Study of Shark Attacks Sid Cook 97 Sharks and the Media Steve Boyer 119 Recent Advances in Protecting People from Dangerous Sharks abstract Bernard Zahuranec information: 127 Shark Fisheries and Utilization U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Great White Shark (Carcharodon Carcharias) UNDER the U.S
    PETITION TO LIST THE NORTHEASTERN PACIFIC OCEAN DISTINCT POPULATION SEGMENT OF Great White Shark (Carcharodon carcharias) UNDER THE U.S. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT Photo: Terry Goss Petition Submitted to the U.S. Secretary of Commerce, Acting through the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the National Marine Fisheries Service Petitioner: WildEarth Guardians 1536 Wynkoop Street, Suite 301 Denver, Colorado 80202 303.573.4898 June 20, 2012 INTRODUCTION WildEarth Guardians (“Guardians”) requests that the Secretary of Commerce, acting through the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS),1 an agency within the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), list the northeastern Pacific Distinct Population Segment (DPS) of Great White Shark, Carcharodon carcharias, under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) (16 U.S.C. §§ 1531-1544). WildEarth Guardians also requests that NMFS designate critical habitat for the species in U. S. waters. Despite its reputation, the Great White Shark needs our protection more than our fear. Over 100 million sharks, of all species, are killed annually by humans. In contrast, sharks of any type only claim approximately 10 human lives per year (NOAA 2012 at 2). A human is 15 times more likely to be killed by a falling coconut than by a shark (Id.). The Great White Shark’s imperilment is part of a concerning pattern of shark endangerment globally (for example see Baum et al. 2003; Dulvy et al. 2008). Sharks are both intentionally targeted by fisheries and are killed when caught as bycatch. Sometimes they are simply “finned” – a cruel technique wherein a shark’s fin is cut off but the living shark is discarded to die a lingering death from drowning or starvation at the bottom of the ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology of Marine Mammals
    Romero, A. 2009. The Biology of Marine Mammals. The Biology of Marine Mammals Aldemaro Romero, Ph.D. Arkansas State University Jonesboro, AR 2009 2 INTRODUCTION Dear students, 3 Chapter 1 Introduction to Marine Mammals 1.1. Overture Humans have always been fascinated with marine mammals. These creatures have been the basis of mythical tales since Antiquity. For centuries naturalists classified them as fish. Today they are symbols of the environmental movement as well as the source of heated controversies: whether we are dealing with the clubbing pub seals in the Arctic or whaling by industrialized nations, marine mammals continue to be a hot issue in science, politics, economics, and ethics. But if we want to better understand these issues, we need to learn more about marine mammal biology. The problem is that, despite increased research efforts, only in the last two decades we have made significant progress in learning about these creatures. And yet, that knowledge is largely limited to a handful of species because they are either relatively easy to observe in nature or because they can be studied in captivity. Still, because of television documentaries, ‘coffee-table’ books, displays in many aquaria around the world, and a growing whale and dolphin watching industry, people believe that they have a certain familiarity with many species of marine mammals (for more on the relationship between humans and marine mammals such as whales, see Ellis 1991, Forestell 2002). As late as 2002, a new species of beaked whale was being reported (Delbout et al. 2002), in 2003 a new species of baleen whale was described (Wada et al.
    [Show full text]