DOCSLIB.ORG

Insights from Stasi Spying in East Germany

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Insights from Stasi Spying in East Germany 317 ifo 2019 WORKING December 2019 PAPERS The Long-Term Costs of Government Surveillance: Insights from Stasi Spying in East Germany Andreas Lichter, Max Löffler, Sebastian Siegloch Imprint: ifo Working Papers Publisher and distributor: ifo Institute – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich Poschingerstr. 5, 81679 Munich, Germany Telephone +49(0)89 9224 0, Telefax +49(0)89 985369, email [email protected] www.ifo.de An electronic version of the paper may be downloaded from the ifo website: www.ifo.de ifo Working Paper No. 317 The Long-Term Costs of Government Surveillance: Insights from Stasi Spying in East Germany* Abstract We investigate the long-run effects of government surveillance on civic capital and economic performance, studying the case of the Stasi in East Germany. Exploiting regional variation in the number of spies and administrative features of the system, we combine a border discontinuity design with an instrumental variables strategy to estimate the long-term, post-reunification effect of government surveillance. We find that a higher spying density led to persistently lower levels of interpersonal and insti- tutional trust in post-reunification Germany. We also find substantial and long-lasting economic effects of Stasi surveillance, resulting in lower income, higher exposure to unemployment, and lower self-employment. JEL Code: H11, N34, N44, P20 Keywords: Civic capital, government surveillance, trust, economic performance, East Germany Andreas Lichter Max Löffler Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, DICE, IZA ifo Institute, IZA [email protected] [email protected] Sebastian Siegloch ZEW, University of Mannheim, IZA, CESifo [email protected] This paper has been accepted for publication in the Journal of the European Economic Association. * The first version of this paper circulates as IZA Discussion Paper No. 9245. We are grateful to Jens Gieseke for sharing county-level data on official employees of the Ministry for State Security, and Davide Cantoni for sharing regional GDR data with us. We would like to thank Felix Bierbrauer, Pierre Cahuc, Davide Cantoni, Antonio Ciccone, Arnaud Chevalier, Ernesto Dal Bó, Denvil Duncan, Frederico Finan, Corrado Giulietti, Yuriy Gorodnichenko, Emanuel Hansen, Mark Harrison, Johannes Hermle, Paul Hufe, David Jaeger, Pat Kline, Michael Krause, Ulrike Malmendier, Andreas Peichl, Gerard Pfann, Martin Peitz, Nico Pestel, Anna Raute, Derek Stemple, Jochen Streb, Uwe Sunde, Nico Voigtländer, Johannes Voget, Fabian Waldinger, Felix Weinhardt, Ludger Wößmann, Noam Yuchtman as well as conference partici- pants at IIPF, SOLE, VfS, ASSA, EEA and seminar participants at IZA Bonn, ZEW Mannheim, BeNA Berlin, U Mannheim, U Münster, U Bonn, CREST, Paris School of Economics, UC Berkeley, U Düsseldorf, CReAM, U Maastricht, IAB Nuremberg, U Bochum, and TU Munich for their valuable comments and suggestions. Tim Bayer, Felix Pöge and Georgios Tassoukis provided outstanding research assistance. We would also like to thank the SOEPremote team at DIW Berlin for their continuous support. 1 Introduction Autocracies have been the dominant form of government in human history. Despite substantial shifts towards more democratic political institutions in recent decades, autocratic regimes still rule in more than a quarter of the countries worldwide (see Figure B.1), accounting for more than one third of the world population (The Economist Intelligence Unit, 2014). A common, defining characteristic of autocracies is the repression of oppositional movements to ensure political stability and avoid revolution (Gerschewski, 2013, Marshall et al., 2017). While regimes differ in their mix of repressive measures, all need to extract precise information about oppositional movements within the population. To this end, they operate large-scale state surveillance systems that monitor the population (Davenport, 2005). These repressive surveillance measures, reaching deep into private lives, may in turn affect individual social behavior, creating a widespread atmosphere of suspicion and distrust towards fellow citizens and state institutions, and thereby transform civil society (Arendt, 1951). While qualitative historical research and numerous media contributions support this mechanism, there is no systematic empirical evidence documenting the detrimental effects of such repressive measures on society.1 In this paper, we intend to advance our understanding of the legacy of repression by studying the case of the socialist German Democratic Republic (GDR). The GDR was an autocratic state, whose repressive policies were explicitly built upon silent methods of surveillance rather than overt persecution and violence (Knabe, 1999). As a result, the regime implemented one of the largest and densest surveillance networks of all time. The Ministry for State Security, commonly referred to as the Stasi, administered a huge body of so-called Inoffizielle Mitarbeiter, unofficial informers. These informers accounted for around one percent of the East German population in the 1980s and were regarded as the regime’s most important instrument to secure power (Muller-Enbergs,¨ 1996, p. 305). Informers were ordinary citizens who kept their regular jobs but secretly gathered information within their professional and social network, thus betraying the trust of friends, neighbors, and colleagues (Bruce, 2010). A large body of historical research deems the effects of the surveillance apparatus as devastating, having shattered interpersonal trust with long-lasting consequences: “The oppressive effects of the constant threat of Stasi surveillance [. ] can scarcely be overstated. It led to perpetual insecurity in personal relationships, and was to leave a difficult legacy for post-reunification Germany” (Fulbrook, 2009, p. 221).2 We put these claims to a test by estimating the long-term, post-reunification effects of state surveillance on society after the fall of the GDR regime. Using administrative data on the ubiquitous network of informers, we construct a measure of local surveillance intensity and exploit administrative features of the Stasi to set-up a quasi-experimental research design. To operationalize the effect of surveillance on social and cooperative behavior, we choose standard measures of interpersonal and institutional trust that have been seen as key components in broader measures of civic capital (Knack 1 A limited number of papers studies determinants of state repression, mostly focusing on specific configurations of political institutions that lead to repression (Collier and Rohner, 2008, Besley and Persson, 2009). Similarly, studies in other social sciences primarily analyze political and societal factors that lead regimes to use coercive power; only few studies investigate micro-level effects of repression on groups such as environmental activists (see Davenport, 2007, Earl, 2011, for surveys in political science and sociology, respectively). 2 See also Gieseke (2014, p. 95) or Childs and Popplewell (1996, p. 111). 2 and Keefer, 1997, Guiso et al., 2008, 2010).3 While the general nature of autocratic repression suggests deteriorations in individuals’ trust in institutions, the specific use of informers within social networks makes interpersonal trust another well-suited measure to proxy the social costs of surveillance. Last, we additionally test whether Stasi surveillance had an effect on measures of economic performance such as income and unemployment, as civic capital has been shown to be positively associated with economic outcomes (see Algan and Cahuc, 2014, Fuchs-Schundeln¨ and Hassan, 2016, for surveys, and the more detailed discussion below). Our empirical strategy explicitly addresses the concern that recruitment of informers across space might not have been random by combining a border discontinuity design with an instrumental variables approach that takes advantage of the specific administrative structure of the surveillance state. Stasi district offices bore full responsibility for securing their territory and supervising the respective subordinate county offices, which caused surveillance intensities to differ substantially across GDR districts (Engelmann and Schumann, 1995). Important for our identification strategy, this structure was at odds with the fully centralized political system of the GDR, which followed the Leninist principle of Democratic Centralism in allocating all political powers and legislative competencies to the level of the central government (Bartsch, 1991, Niemann, 2007). This set-up allows us to use discontinuities in surveillance intensities along district borders as a source of exogenous variation. Using the leave-out average surveillance intensity at the district level as an instrument, we further isolate the part of the variation in the county-level spying density that is explained by differences in surveillance strategies across districts. Overall, the results of our study offer substantial evidence for negative and long-lasting effects of government surveillance on civic capital and economic performance. Using data from the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP), we find that a higher spying density leads to lower trust in strangers and stronger negative reciprocity, two standard measures predicting cooperative behavior (Glaeser et al., 2000, Dohmen et al., 2009). In terms of magnitude, we find that a one standard deviation increase in the spying density – equal to more than one third of the average surveillance intensity –
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Victims at the Berlin Wall, 1961-1989 by Hans-Hermann Hertle/Maria Nooke August 2011
    Special CWIHP Research Report The Victims at the Berlin Wall, 1961-1989 By Hans-Hermann Hertle/Maria Nooke August 2011 Forty-four years after the Berlin Wall was built and 15 years after the East German archives were opened, reliable data on the number of people killed at the Wall were still lacking. Depending on the sources, purpose, and date of the studies, the figures varied between 78 (Central Registry of State Judicial Administrations in Salzgitter), 86 (Berlin Public Prosecution Service), 92 (Berlin Police President), 122 (Central Investigation Office for Government and Unification Criminality), and more than 200 deaths (Working Group 13 August). The names of many of the victims, their biographies and the circumstances in which they died were widely unknown.1 This special CWIHP report summarizes the findings of a research project by the Center for Research on Contemporary History Potsdam and the Berlin Wall Memorial Site and Documentation Center which sought to establish the number and identities of the individuals who died at the Berlin Wall between 1961 and 1989 and to document their lives and deaths through historical and biographical research.2 Definition In order to provide reliable figures, the project had to begin by developing clear criteria and a definition of what individuals are to be considered victims at the Berlin Wall. We regard the “provable causal and spatial connection of a death with an attempted escape or a direct or indirect cause or lack of action by the ‘border organs’ in the border territory” as the critical factor. In simpler terms: the criteria are either an attempted escape or a temporal and spatial link between the death and the border regime.
    [Show full text]
  • Überseehafen Rostock: East Germany’S Window to the World Under Stasi Watch, 1961-1989
    Tomasz Blusiewicz Überseehafen Rostock: East Germany’s Window to the World under Stasi Watch, 1961-1989 Draft: Please do not cite Dear colleagues, Thank you for your interest in my dissertation chapter. Please see my dissertation outline to get a sense of how it is going to fit within the larger project, which also includes Poland and the Soviet Union, if you're curious. This is of course early work in progress. I apologize in advance for the chapter's messy character, sloppy editing, typos, errors, provisional footnotes, etc,. Still, I hope I've managed to reanimate my prose to an edible condition. I am looking forward to hearing your thoughts. Tomasz I. Introduction Alexander Schalck-Golodkowski, a Stasi Oberst in besonderen Einsatz , a colonel in special capacity, passed away on June 21, 2015. He was 83 years old. Schalck -- as he was usually called by his subordinates -- spent most of the last quarter-century in an insulated Bavarian mountain retreat, his career being all over three weeks after the fall of the Wall. But his death did not pass unnoticed. All major German evening TV news services marked his death, most with a few minutes of extended commentary. The most popular one, Tagesschau , painted a picture of his life in colors appropriately dark for one of the most influential and enigmatic figures of the Honecker regime. True, Mielke or Honecker usually had the last word, yet Schalck's aura of power appears unparalleled precisely because the strings he pulled remained almost always behind the scenes. "One never saw his face at the time.
    [Show full text]
  • Conspiracy of Peace: the Cold War, the International Peace Movement, and the Soviet Peace Campaign, 1946-1956
    The London School of Economics and Political Science Conspiracy of Peace: The Cold War, the International Peace Movement, and the Soviet Peace Campaign, 1946-1956 Vladimir Dobrenko A thesis submitted to the Department of International History of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, October 2015 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 90,957 words. Statement of conjoint work I can confirm that my thesis was copy edited for conventions of language, spelling and grammar by John Clifton of www.proofreading247.co.uk/ I have followed the Chicago Manual of Style, 16th edition, for referencing. 2 Abstract This thesis deals with the Soviet Union’s Peace Campaign during the first decade of the Cold War as it sought to establish the Iron Curtain. The thesis focuses on the primary institutions engaged in the Peace Campaign: the World Peace Council and the Soviet Peace Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Rise of Totalitarianism Ch
    RISE OF TOTALITARIANISM CH. 14.1-Revolutions in Russia Objective Review 1. What led to the Russian Revolution? 2. What was the March Revolution? 3. What were Lenin’s reforms? Bolshevik Revolution • Lenin returns: Lenin in disguise, Petrograd, April 1917 w/o beard – Germany knows Lenin would stir unrest • Hurt Russian war effort • Returns in armored RR car, under German protection –* “Peace, Land, and Bread” Bolsheviks in Power • Red Guard – Armed Bolshevik enforcers • Arrest Provisional govt. officials, later disappear… • Royal family Murdered • * Russians support Bolsheviks -Call for Immediate peace with the Germans in WWI – Peasants receive farmland – Workers control factories – March 1918 sign Treaty of Brest-Litovsk Civil War Rages in Russia 1918-1920 • Red Army 1920 Lenin cleanses the earth – Bolsheviks • Vladimir Lenin is leader – Leon Trotsky military genius – Joseph Stalin political genius • White Army – Any one who was not a Bolshevik – Western nations, U.S. (sent aid) • Bolsheviks victorious • 14 million die (Due to Revolution) Lenin Restores Order • Lenin needs to restore industry • 1921 New Economic Policy (NEP) – Major industries, banks, ran by the state – Some small businesses, foreign investment encouraged – 1928 econ. back to pre- WWI levels Political Reforms • Nationalism seen as a threat Karl Marx 1818-1883 – Russia organized into small, self ran republics Known as: Union of Soviet Socialist Republics AKA: USSR, or Soviet Union • Bolshevik party becomes the Communist Party – Idea from Karl Marx – Est. dictatorship of the Communist Party not of the proletariat like Marx said Stalin Becomes dictator • 1922 Lenin suffers Leon Trotsky stroke – Who will take power? • Trotsky or Stalin • 1922-1929 struggle Joseph Stalin ensues – 1929 Stalin (political genius) forces Trotsky into exile – Stalin becomes leader (dictator) ET FINISH ALL NOTES 55…#13…BUT WAIT FOR MORE INSTRUCTIONS! Totalitarianism Chapter 14, Section 2 What is Totalitarianism? • A government that takes total control over every aspect of public and private life.
    [Show full text]
  • Schießbefehl and the Issues of Retroactivity Within the East German Border Guard Trials Keegan Mcmurry Western Oregon University, [email protected]
    Western Oregon University Digital Commons@WOU Student Theses, Papers and Projects (History) Department of History 2018 Schießbefehl and the Issues of Retroactivity Within the East German Border Guard Trials Keegan McMurry Western Oregon University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wou.edu/his Part of the Diplomatic History Commons, European History Commons, Legal Commons, and the Political History Commons Recommended Citation McMurry, Keegan, "Schießbefehl and the Issues of Retroactivity Within the East German Border Guard Trials" (2018). Student Theses, Papers and Projects (History). 264. https://digitalcommons.wou.edu/his/264 This Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at Digital Commons@WOU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Theses, Papers and Projects (History) by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@WOU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Schießbefehl1 and the Issues of Retroactivity Within the East German Border Guard Trials Keegan J. McMurry History 499: Senior Seminar June 5, 2018 1 On February 5th, 1989, 20-year old Chris Gueffroy and his companion, Christian Gaudin, were running for their lives. Tired of the poor conditions in the German Democratic Republic and hoping to find better in West Germany, they intended to climb the Berlin Wall that separated East and West Berlin using a ladder. A newspaper account states that despite both verbal warnings and warning shots, both young men continued to try and climb the wall until the border guards opened fire directly at them. Mr. Gaudin survived the experience after being shot, however, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Jason Johnson on States of Division: Border and Boundary
    Sagi Schaefer. States of Division: Border and Boundary Formation in Cold War Rural Germany. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014. 288 pp. $99.00, cloth, ISBN 978-0-19-967238-7. Reviewed by Jason Johnson Published on H-German (December, 2016) Commissioned by Jeremy DeWaal Sagi Schaefer’s book centers on the Cold War the creation of the Iron Curtain. Schaefer now inner-German border through the Eichsfeld re‐ brings a focus on the rural. gion, a rural Catholic enclave in central Germany. Schaefer’s fve chapters thus “foreground the His work continues the important historiographi‐ rural character of the borderlands …. roughly re‐ cal thread of moving beyond Berlin to investigate flecting the experience of farmers” (p. 11). The events and processes of German division that first chapter focuses on the early years of division have been, as Schaefer has written elsewhere, —1945-52—as occupation zonal frontiers crystal‐ “hidden behind the Wall.”[1] Scholarly analysis of lized into the 1949 border between the Federal Re‐ the rural border dividing Germany, stretching public and the German Democratic Republic more than eight hundred miles, has until recent (GDR). Schaefer persuasively illustrates that in the years been largely overshadowed by the division Eichsfeld, “Western economic reconstruction was of Berlin. the most powerful motor of division in those Anthropologist Daphne Berdahl’s pioneering years” (pp. 15-16). Chapter 2 then turns to the wa‐ work Where the World Ended (1999) on the thou‐ tershed year 1952 when the GDR removed thou‐ sand-person East German border community Kel‐ sands from its borderland and began to seal its la helped spark more scholarly interest in the frontier.
    [Show full text]
  • John O. Koehler Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt8d5nd4nw No online items Register of the John O. Koehler papers Finding aid prepared by Hoover Institution Library and Archives Staff Hoover Institution Library and Archives © 2009 434 Galvez Mall Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-6003 [email protected] URL: http://www.hoover.org/library-and-archives Register of the John O. Koehler 2001C75 1 papers Title: John O. Koehler papers Date (inclusive): 1934-2008 Collection Number: 2001C75 Contributing Institution: Hoover Institution Library and Archives Language of Material: In German and English Physical Description: 74 manuscript boxes, 1 oversize box, 3 card file boxes(31.1 Linear Feet) Abstract: Correspondence, news dispatches and news stories, photocopies of East German secret police documents, photocopies of United States government documents, post-reunification German governmental reports, clippings, other printed matter, photographs, sound recordings, and video tapes, relating to political conditions in Germany, the East German secret police, the attempted assassination of Pope John Paul II, and Soviet espionage within the Catholic Church. In part, used as research material for the books by J. O. Koehler, Stasi: The Untold Story of the East German Secret Police (Boulder, Colo., 1999), and Spies in the Vatican: The Soviet Union's War against the Catholic Church (2009). Creator: Koehler, John O. Hoover Institution Library & Archives Access The collection is open for research; materials must be requested at least two business days in advance of intended use. Publication Rights For copyright status, please contact the Hoover Institution Library & Archives Acquisition Information Acquired by the Hoover Institution Library & Archives in 2001 Preferred Citation [Identification of item], John O.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Origin and Composition of the German East-West Population Gap
    DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 12031 On the Origin and Composition of the German East-West Population Gap Christoph Eder Martin Halla DECEMBER 2018 DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 12031 On the Origin and Composition of the German East-West Population Gap Christoph Eder Johannes Kepler University Linz Martin Halla Johannes Kepler University Linz, CD-Lab Aging, Health, and the Labor Market, IZA and Austrian Public Health Institute DECEMBER 2018 Any opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but IZA takes no institutional policy positions. The IZA research network is committed to the IZA Guiding Principles of Research Integrity. The IZA Institute of Labor Economics is an independent economic research institute that conducts research in labor economics and offers evidence-based policy advice on labor market issues. Supported by the Deutsche Post Foundation, IZA runs the world’s largest network of economists, whose research aims to provide answers to the global labor market challenges of our time. Our key objective is to build bridges between academic research, policymakers and society. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author. IZA – Institute of Labor Economics Schaumburg-Lippe-Straße 5–9 Phone: +49-228-3894-0 53113 Bonn, Germany Email: [email protected] www.iza.org IZA DP No. 12031 DECEMBER 2018 ABSTRACT On the Origin and Composition of the German East-West Population Gap* The East-West gap in the German population is believed to originate from migrants escaping the socialist regime in the German Democratic Republic (GDR).
    [Show full text]
  • Collapse of Memory
    – – COLLAPSE OF MEMORY – MEMORY OF COLLAPSE Narrating Past, Presence and Future about Periods of Crisis Alexander Drost Olga Sasunkevich Joachim Schiedermair COLLAPSE OF MEMORY OF COLLAPSE MEMORY Barbara Törnquist-Plewa (Eds.) Alexander Drost, Volha Olga Sasunkevich, Olga Sasunkevich, Alexander Drost, Volha Joachim Schiedermair, Barbara Törnquist-Plewa Joachim Schiedermair, Barbara Törnquist-Plewa Open-Access-Publikation im Sinne der CC-Lizenz BY-NC 4.0 Open-Access-Publikation im Sinne der CC-Lizenz BY-NC 4.0 Alexander Drost ∙ Olga Sasunkevich Joachim Schiedermair ∙ Barbara Törnquist-Plewa (Ed.) COLLAPSE OF MEMORY – MEMORY OF COLLAPSE NARRATING PAST, PRESENCE AND FUTURE ABOUT PERIODS OF CRISIS BÖHLAU VERLAG WIEN KÖLN WEIMAR Open-Access-Publikation im Sinne der CC-Lizenz BY-NC 4.0 Gedruckt mit Unterstützung der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft aus Mitteln des Internationalen Graduiertenkollegs 1540 „Baltic Borderlands: Shifting Boundaries of Mind and Culture in the Borderlands of the Baltic Sea Region“ Published with assistance of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft by funding of the International Research Training Group “Baltic Borderlands: Shifting Boundaries of Mind and Culture in the Borderlands of the Baltic Sea Region” Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek : Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie ; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.d-nb.de abrufbar. © 2019 by Böhlau Verlag GmbH & Cie, Lindenstraße 14, D-50674 Köln
    [Show full text]
  • Time Lag of Defa-Futurum: a Socialist Cine-Futurism from East Germany
    The Time Lag of Defa-Futurum: A Socialist Cine-Futurism from East Ger­ many The Time Lag of Defa-Futurum: A Socialist Cine-Futur­ ism from East Germany Doreen Mende The Oxford Handbook of Communist Visual Cultures Edited by Aga Skrodzka, Xiaoning Lu, and Katarzyna Marciniak Subject: Literature, Literary Theory and Cultural Studies, Literary Studies - 20th Century On­ wards Online Publication Date: Jan 2020 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190885533.013.11 Abstract and Keywords On April 23, 1975, at Karl Marx University in Leipzig, the East German filmmaker Joachim Hellwig (1932–2014) and scriptwriter Claus Ritter (1929–1995), both initiators and authors of the artistic working group defa-futurum, defended their collectively writ­ ten practice-based PhD on the “artistic forms for imagining a socialist future by the means of film under specific consideration of the experiences of the working group defa- futurum.” Strongly influenced by Hellwig’s antifascist projects and nonfictional documen­ tary practice, defa-futurum demonstrates a specific concern for a Marxist cybernetics with regard to creative thinking, labor, love, and political work. The latter is elaborated in greater detail by engaging with the forgotten writings of the philosopher Franz Loeser. Defa-futurum allowed the idea of film-as-theory to endorse the GDR as a sovereign state— promoting also an East German socialist internationalism—under the conditions of the global Cold War by the means of cinema. By using methods from visual culture and cul­ tural studies to facilitate a decolonizing analysis of defa-futurum’s films, Stasi files, archival material, and original writings, the article aims to argue that decolonizing social­ ism is necessary in order to break through the Cold War’s binary limits for understanding technopolitics, art, and social realities in the post-1989 world.
    [Show full text]
  • Friday, December 7, 2018
    Friday, December 7, 2018 Registration Desk Hours: 7:00 AM – 5:00 PM, 4th Floor Exhibit Hall Hours: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM, 3rd Floor Audio-Visual Practice Room: 7:00 AM – 6:00 PM, 4th Floor, office beside Registration Desk Cyber Cafe - Third Floor Atrium Lounge, 3 – Open Area Session 4 – Friday – 8:00-9:45 am Committee on Libraries and Information Resources Subcommittee on Copyright Issues - (Meeting) - Rhode Island, 5 4-01 War and Society Revisited: The Second World War in the USSR as Performance - Arlington, 3 Chair: Vojin Majstorovic, Vienna Wiesenthal Institute for Holocaust Studies (Austria) Papers: Roxane Samson-Paquet, U of Toronto (Canada) "Peasant Responses to War, Evacuation, and Occupation: Food and the Context of Violence in the USSR, June 1941–March 1942" Konstantin Fuks, U of Toronto (Canada) "Beyond the Soviet War Experience?: Mints Commission Interviews on Nazi-Occupied Latvia" Paula Chan, Georgetown U "Red Stars and Yellow Stars: Soviet Investigations of Nazi Crimes in the Baltic Republics" Disc.: Kenneth Slepyan, Transylvania U 4-02 Little-Known Russian and East European Research Resources in the San Francisco Bay Area - Berkeley, 3 Chair: Richard Gardner Robbins, U of New Mexico Papers: Natalia Ermakova, Western American Diocese ROCOR "The Russian Orthodox Church and Russian Emigration as Documented in the Archives of the Western American Diocese of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia" Galina Epifanova, Museum of Russian Culture, San Francisco "'In Memory of the Tsar': A Review of Memoirs of Witnesses and Contemporaries of Emperor Nicholas II from the Museum of Russian Culture of San Francisco" Liladhar R.
    [Show full text]
  • Ostpolitik Revisited1 Karl Cordell, University of Plymouth Stefan Wolff, University of Nottingham
    A Foreign Policy Analysis of the “German Question”: Ostpolitik Revisited1 Karl Cordell, University of Plymouth Stefan Wolff, University of Nottingham Abstract Taking a constructivist approach to foreign policy analysis and using German policy vis-à-vis Poland and Czechoslovakia/the Czech Republic as an example, we examine Ostpolitik since the 1960s as a case of a norm-driven foreign policy. We argue that the content of Ostpolitik, including changes over time, can be explained by reference to a prevailing norm consensus in Germany about the country‘s foreign policy towards Central and Eastern Europe, which began to develop in the 1960s. 1 The authors wish to thank the British Academy for their support through LRG-35361 in the preparation of this paper. They also extend their thanks to Klaus Bachmann, Andrzej Dybczyński and Zdeněk Hausvater. This article partially draws on findings presented in Cordell and Wolff (2005a). 1 1. Introduction During his historic visit to Warsaw in December 1970 for the signing of the second of the so-called Ostverträge,2 German Chancellor Willy Brandt undertook a momentous and unprecedented gesture. During a commemorative act for the victims of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising of April/May 1943, he fell to his knees in an act of apology for German atrocities committed against Poland and especially Polish Jews during the Second World War. Some 24 years later, In August 1994 on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the (Home Army‘s) Warsaw Uprising of August/October 1944, German President Roman Herzog similarly apologised for German actions during the war in a speech in Warsaw and expressed Germany‘s unconditional support for Polish accession to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and the European Union (EU).
    [Show full text]