Will the Lights Go Out?" Recent Major Changes in Energy Availability Are Making People See This As a Serious Question

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Will the Lights Go Out? Summary of conference proceedings Roger Kemp Foreward "Will the lights go out?" Recent major changes in energy availability are making people see this as a serious question. In recent years dramatic and large scale electricity power cuts affected London and south east England. These were, however, minor compared with massive cuts across Europe and North America. With prices on the world oil market rising substantially as a result of global political unrest, and growing world demand, it is easy to see that our electricity supply infrastructure is inadequate. Governments are expected to provide the answer. Everyone agrees that a sound energy policy is crucial for a modern economy, but such a policy is difficult to devise, maintain and implement. It is especially difficult as, for the twenty years since the oil crises of 1974 and the 1980’s, we have enjoyed an extended period of general calm which has lulled us into not even thinking of energy. Cheap, guaranteed fuel is now not an option. The 2003 Energy White Paper and the recent Energy Bill have challenged the UK to review its energy policy and how this is used. Public debate on energy policy and how it affects us in the North West in these early years of the 21st century and beyond is essential. We need to understand issues such as the objectives and implications of the Kyoto Protocol and how they will affect us. To this end, a wide range of expert and authoritative speakers were assembled to present a one-day Conference with a holistic character. Will the lights go out? Over 240 delegates from the UK, France and the USA attended the Delegate groupings conference on Tuesday 14th December 2004, with academic, industrial, governmental and public sectors all well represented. A feedback Academe questionnaire was distributed after the conference and the responses Industry obtained are summarised at the end of this publication. Government Lancaster University, the North West Energy Council and the NGO/Lobbies Government Office for the North West sponsored the Conference which was chaired by Professor Sue Cox. Delegates had the Other opportunity to contribute in the three question-and-answer sessions, and in the Open Debate at the end. This document provides a summary of the main points expressed by the speakers on the day, it also incorporates some of the significant points raised by the panellists and the delegates during the discussion sessions and final open debate. Conference Programme 09:30 Introduction What are our options? (continued) by Sue Cox 13:30 What is the future for fossil fuels? Keith Anderson (Scottish Power) Energy - is a crisis looming? 13:50 Can nuclear power come back? st 09:35 Energy: the challenges in the 21 Century Richard Mayson (BNFL) Cristóbal Burgos-Alonso (EC) 14:10 Can the grid deliver? 10:00 Is Britain living in a fool's paradise? Nick Jenkins (University of Manchester) Sir Christopher Audland 14:30 Moving towards hydrogen? Keith Ross (University of Salford) 10:25 Discussion 15:00 Panel discussion 10:40 Coffee break 15:20 Tea What are our options? What is stopping us? 11:05 How can we cut demand, 15:45 Societal, ecological & political dilemmas at home and in industry? Sir Martin Holdgate Brenda Boardman (ECI, Oxford University) 16:05 Open debate Introduced by Joe Flanagan (NWEC) 11:35 The facts and fiction of renewable energy George Aggidis (Lancaster University) Résumé 12:05 Panel discussion 16:50 Summing up by the conference rapporteur 12:30 Lunch Roger Kemp (Lancaster University) 17:00 Close 1 Conference Speakers Professor Sue Cox Mr Keith Anderson Sue is Dean of the Management School Keith joined Scottish Power in 1999 and at Lancaster University, where she holds a was appointed as UK Strategy & External Chair in Safety and Risk Management. Affairs Director in August 2003. As a Sue acts as a government advisor and member of the UK Executive Team, Keith actively contributes to a number of nuclear safety is responsible for leading the strategic advisory committees in relation to organisational process within the UK Division and managing key strategy and management. interactions with stakeholders. Mr Cristóbal Burgos-Alonso Mr Richard Mayson Cristóbal has been working in the Richard is Technology Director for European Commission since 1987 with Reactor Systems at BNFL, he is also a financial control of structural funds. He member of NW Energy Council. He has joined the Directorate General for Energy been Head of Safety and Environmental in 1992 and became responsible for the Risk Management for BNFL. Richard is EC Gas Unit in 1997. In 2001 he was nominated Head interested in Advanced Passive Design Pressurised of Unit responsible for Security of Supply - internal and Water Reactors and developments such as Pebble Bed external, and the follow-up of the Green Paper Modular Reactors. debate. In October 2003 Cristóbal was appointed Adviser to the EC Conventional Energies' Directorate. Professor Nick Jenkins Nick is Professor of Electrical Energy and Sir Christopher Audland Power Systems at the University of Christopher was Director-General for Manchester and Director of the Joule Energy of the European Commission Centre. His research interests include from 1981 to 1986. As such, he attended distributed generation, renewable energy, wind all meetings of Western Economic energy, photo-voltaics, power quality and the Summits, the European Council, the hydrogen economy. European Parliament, and the Council of Ministers, when Energy was debated: and also all top Professor Keith Ross level meetings of the IEA and IAEA. He was also the Keith is Professor of Physics and Director Commission's Co-ordinator for all work arising from of the Institute for Materials Research at the Chernobyl accident. He later became Executive the University of Salford. He leads the President of Europa Nostra, the key pan-European Hydrogen Energy activity in the Joule NGO for Heritage questions (including the built and Energy Research Centre and is a Member natural heritage). of International Energy Agency Task 17: Hydrogen Storage. Dr Brenda Boardman Brenda is head of the Lower Carbon Eur Ing George Aggidis Futures team at Oxford University's George is Senior Lecturer in Engineering Environmental Change Institute. Her main at Lancaster University, Director of research focus is on energy efficiency and Lancaster University Renewable Energy the way that energy is used in British Group and Director of Lancaster homes, particularly by low income households, i.e. fuel University Fluid Machinery Group. He has poverty. She has been a member of the DTI's Energy made wide-ranging contributions to Advisory Panel and is widely viewed as one of the research, design, and development in the field of fluid most experienced in her field. She was awarded an machinery and renewable energy, including patent for MBE in 1998 for her work on energy issues. power generation water turbines. He is on the Board of the Joule Centre and also the Fluid Machinery Sir Martin Holdgate Group of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Martin has been Chairman of the Government's Energy Advisory Panel, Mr Joe Flanagan Member of the UN Task Force on Joe joined the NWDA as Head of Energy Environment and Human Settlements in December 2003 coinciding with the and a Trustee of the UK National formation of the NW Energy Council. Heritage Memorial Fund/Heritage Lottery Fund. He was been President of the Zoological Society Professor Roger Kemp of London from 1994 to 2003, and is also Chairman Roger is a Professorial Fellow in the of the International Institute for Environment and Engineering Department at Lancaster Development and a member of the Royal Commission University. He spent almost 30 years in on Environmental Pollution. the rail industry. He retains his rail interests at the university as well as being a member of the sustainable energy group. 2 Will the lights go out? Summary of conference proceedings Introduction Some speakers welcomed the white paper – One described himself as a “fan”. Others were less The conference, held at Lancaster University on enthusiastic – Sir Martin Holdgate described it as “not 14 December 2004, attracted more than 230 a thought-through strategy, never mind an delegates, evenly divided between industry, academia implementable plan”. and local groups. Several speakers questioned the EWP’s mixing the In the course of a very full day, papers were presented ability to pay with policies to reduce CO2 emissions. by 10 invited speakers and there were diverse Professor Alasdair Macbean argued that there is a contributions both from members of an invited panel strong case for raising the price of energy and using and from the floor. the income to subsidise those unable to afford to This summary tries to capture the main points made keep themselves warm. Julian Carter from Energy during the day; it does not claim to be a full transcript North-West argued for the need to decouple policies of proceedings and contributions have been grouped on fuel poverty from energy policy. On the other by topic, rather than chronologically. Unless a hand Karl Brookes from Energywatch strongly argued statement is specifically attributed, there should be no for maintaining low domestic energy prices to avoid presumption that it was supported by any individual. fuel poverty and achieving savings in other ways. The main themes Security of supply Throughout the conference four main themes Richard Mayson showed a graph of the predicted run- emerged: down of UK nuclear generation from more than 9000 MWe in 2003 to about 1000 MWe when only Security of supply; Sizewell B is operating after 2023. Limiting climate change; Fig 1: Rundown of UK nuclear plant Local environmental and amenity impact of energy industries; 10000 The way forward.
Recommended publications
  • NW Regional Technical Advisory Body 3Rd
    North West Regional Technical Advisory Body 3rd Waste Management Monitoring Report Working towards sustainable waste management in the North West August 2007 Contents Foreword . .2 Executive summary . .3 1. Introduction . .4 2. Municipal waste . .7 3. Commercial and industrial waste . .15 4. Construction, demolition and excavation waste . .19 5. Management of waste at facilities and sites . .20 6. Fly-tipping and enforcement . .27 7. Special waste . .29 8. Agricultural waste . .32 9. Radioactive waste . .33 10. Identification of waste management facilities of national, regional and sub-regional significance . .34 Glossary . .35 Abbreviations . .36 Technical Appendices 1. Additional tables and figures . .38 2. Progress report on implementation of the North West Regional Waste Strategy Action Plan . .44 Photo credits Front cover top: Merseyside Objective 1Programme Front cover bottom: Envirolink Northwest Back cover top: David Jones Photography/Merseyside Waste Disposal Authority 3rd Annual Monitoring Report – Working towards sustainable waste management in the North West 1 August 2007 Foreword The North West Regional Technical Advisory Body (NWRTAB) is (Environment Agency). This has produced a report with broader publishing its 3rd Annual Monitoring Report. This year we have scope and hopefully a better read. sought to broaden the appeal of the document and extend its scope The report covers a period of considerable activity on both policy to encompass matters wider than just core statistics about waste making and development and practical waste management, which activity in the North West. includes: The core purpose of the NWRTAB is to collect, collate and interpret o Movement of the draft Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS) through its data and other information about waste activity in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Biomass Task Force Report to Government • October 2005 Standing – Nikki Macleod, David Clayton, Rebecca Cowburn
    Biomass Task Force Report To Government • October 2005 Standing – Nikki MacLeod, David Clayton, Rebecca Cowburn. Seated – John Roberts CBE, Sir Ben Gill CBE, Nick Hartley FOREWORD by Sir Ben Gill The challenge set for the Task Force was to make proposals to optimise the contribution of biomass to a range of targets and policies set by the Government. In setting out the case for biomass we noted that the Energy White Paper contained clear aspirations about renewable energy, security of supply, competitiveness and fuel poverty. The Government also has the important objectives of sustainable development and sustainable farming, forestry and woodland management. Taken together, all of these aims can deliver environmental improvement and also economic benefit particularly in rural and other areas. Our work has shown that the potential of biomass is significant. We have taken the real contribution it can make to the climate change agenda as the primary driver. In putting in place a programme of actions to deliver biomass energy there is a critical need for a strategic approach by the Government to enable the potential to be exploited. We focus on the fact that in spite of more than one-third of primary energy being used for heat there has been a lack of recognition of the role of renewable heat in policy delivery. The approach could be characterised as - no targets; no concerted policy; no strategy; and, limited support for development. So far as DTI’s Energy White Paper is concerned there was a missed opportunity to develop targets for renewable heat and this has perpetuated an inconsistency of approach in Government and in the Regions.
    [Show full text]
  • SECTION 2.Cdr
    Tal IF THE BOFFINS, BRAIN QUESTIONS STILL NEE EDUCATION, TO COM CHALLENGES? IF WE T IN THE TECHNO-ADVA NEEDED TO BRING TH THE FRONT PAGES, FR PUT THESE QUESTION WORDS BY AMANDA WOOD talking technology stimulating science despite the northwest having excellent facilities, it’s time to pr research money is being poured into the south east. If necessity is the mot it makes absolutely no sense at all to do this. the UK putting enough in what is the wealthiest part of the country, housing is According to David Cl costly and therefore scientists’ wage costs are high. Engineering and Phys in the end it simply means that the money for research has yet to strengthen doesn’t go as far as it could do if it were located here.” tradition of funding re excellence across a w Geoffrey Piper,North West Business Leadership Team funding in mainstream is high, but the quantit Whilst high-tech indus refining their technolo to move too far away achieving funding for opportunity for the go But for Geoffrey Piper, Team, funds are being because of the geogra “Despite the Northwe for healthcare and me the South East,” he sa is the wealthiest part o wage costs are high. I doesn’t go as far as it As an example Geoffr of Manchester’s Chris into cancer treatment set-up and running co over Daresbury furthe “This is taxpayers’ mo *pic may change research across the b he added. 36 INDUSTRIAL EVOLUTION: THE SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE EDITION it’s time to pry open the public purse And this may be about to happen.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Deconstruction in Selected Countries
    CHAPTER 9 IMPLEMENTING DECONSTRUCTION IN THE UNITED STATES Charles J. Kibert, Abdol R. Chini and Jennifer L. Languell, M.E. Rinker, Sr. School of Building Construction, Center for Construction and Environment, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA SUMMARY Out of 260 million tons of non-industrial waste produced annually in the U.S., 136 million tons are a result of the construction and demolition industry. This equates to approximately 33% of the waste produced nationally. Similarly in the State of Florida, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) reports approximately 22% of the waste produced is a result of construction and demolition activities. In this report, Florida is used as an example of construction waste generation issue in the U.S. The process of deconstruction (the disassembly of structures for the purpose of reusing components and building materials) can significantly decrease the national solid waste burden the construction industry places on the environment. Through deconstruction, natural resources are saved, employment and training opportunities are created, and local businesses are developed that use the materials diverted from landfills. Deconstruction supplies useful materials to building materials yards, recycling centers, and remanufacturing enterprises, creating additional jobs and community revenue. This report investigates and analyzes issues related to the feasibility of replacing demolition and landfilling of building materials with deconstruction and reuse in the U.S. The report
    [Show full text]
  • Comments on Issues Relating to Need Arising from the Responses to the Second Round of Questions
    ARROW 9 Your ref WS010003 ARROW ref 10024954 Nicola Escott ref 10024302 ARROW 9 – Comments on issues relating to Need arising from the responses to the Second Round of Questions Alan Watson (Public Interest Consultants) 1. This note responds to some of the issues arising from comments sent to the ExA on 2nd September 2014 by MJCA on behalf of Whitemoss responding to the Second Round of question. Trends in Hazardous Waste Landfill Question 3.1 Asked the Applicant, EA: “the NPS (Hazardous Waste 2010: England and Wales below para 3.2.7) indicates some 500,000 tonnes of hazardous waste being disposed of in landfill in 2010, following a significant fall in earlier years. In the applicant’s planning statement at para 8.9 and Appendix PS A, hazardous waste deposited for England and Wales in 2012 is shown as being about 4.25 million tonnes, with 716,463 tonnes recorded for the North West region. Of this, 872,436 tonnes in England and Wales was sent to landfill, with 54,955 tonnes to landfill in the North West. Does the EA agree the applicant’s figures? Can data be provided and agreed for hazardous waste for the last five years showing the amount disposed of in landfill in: i. England ii. North West iii. Lancashire 2. Accordingly the Environment Agency response included trend data for hazardous waste landfilled in these areas (p6 of 2nd September response): 3. The MJCA response was consistent with this for Lancashire but different for the North West. The request by the ExA was for data to be provided 1 ARROW 9 (and agreed) for hazardous waste for the last five years showing the amount disposed of in landfill in: i.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Project Report to Defra Sustainable Procurement Task Force Secretariat
    Pilot OpenStrategy® for Sustainable Procurement in the North West Final Project Report to Defra Sustainable Procurement Task Force Secretariat Prepared by: Matthew Wilkinson Sustainable Development Policy Team North West Regional Assembly Wigan Investment Centre Waterside Drive Wigan WN3 5BA Tel: 01942 776724 [email protected] Executive Summary This is the final project report of the Pilot phase of the OpenStrategy® (OS) for sustainable procurement in the North West. This has been funded jointly by Defra’s Sustainable Procurement Task Force (SPTF) Secretariat, North West Regional Assembly (NWRA) and Northwest Regional Development Agency (NWDA). In August 2005, these organisations embarked on a project to provide a basis for a sustainable procurement strategy for the North West using the OpenStrategy® technique. This document is complemented by an Independent Evaluation Report of the OS technique by Forum for the Future (Forum), using this pilot as the primary case study, whilst also drawing upon other applications across the country. The report is available from the Forum for the Future website1. The overall aims of this project were to pilot the OS technique and, in the process, work towards the development of a sustainable procurement strategy for the North West region. A total of 11 stakeholders were engaged with this process and the pilot was supported over a period from the end of September 2005 to May 2006. The OpenStrategy® (OS) system offers a new and innovative approach to multiple stakeholder associations that enables the processes of communication, negotiation, prioritisation and agreement. It is specifically designed to facilitate these processes in partnerships where large numbers of organisations reside.
    [Show full text]
  • New White Shirts
    Waste. It’s one of our greatest regional challenges. England’s Northwest produces almost four million tonnes of municipal waste each year and, if our collectively wasteful behaviour continues unabated, that figure is set to double by 2020. The pressure is on and the rubbish is piling up. Behind every Resourceful tonne of waste that tumbles into our landfill sites lie many more tonnes of precious resources we simply can’t afford to squander, not to mention the release of greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide and methane. Our region’s landfill sites are filling at an alarming rate, with only five years of capacity left, solutions and ever-greater pressure is being placed on businesses, local authorities and individuals to clean up their act. Greater Manchester Waste Ltd (GMW) - the largest waste disposal and management company owned and controlled by from GMW a local authority - is one of the key players when it comes to addressing the problem of waste. GMW manages and disposes of waste as carefully and responsibly as possible but, crucially, it is also looking at ways to conserve resources, reduce waste levels and contribute to the sustainable development of England’s Northwest. The company’s Thermal Recovery Facility in Bolton is one development that GMW considers an important contribution to sustainability.The plant handles 120,000 tonnes of waste each year and from this waste generates 10MW of electricity - enough to heat 7,000 homes. Plans for an associated, local, district heating system are currently being discussed, and the ash from the facility is being recovered with the aim of reusing it in the construction industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Greatest Hits for Low Carbon Economic Development.Pdf
    Northwest England Greatest Hits Briefings | January 2011 No.5 Greatest Hits for Low Carbon Economic Development Delivering the Low Carbon Economy through local authority economic development and regeneration in local areas This briefing is intended as a guide to the Low Carbon Economy in the North West. It summarises key points from regional research, strategies, sub-regional documents and effective practice. Its intended audience is people working in economic development, regeneration, planning and development, policy, sustainability as well as council members and those who are supporting businesses and involved in establishing Local Economic Partnerships (LEPs). The briefing provides practical information support and is linked to a detailed research report Developing Strong Links Between the Low Carbon Economy and Economic Development in Local Authorities. Download the full report from http://www.climatechangenorthwest.co.uk/assets/_files/documents/dec_10/cli__1293054218 _FINAL_REPORT_CLASP_-_Interim_E.pdf Contents: (Click to navigate) 1. Background 2. What is the Low Carbon Economy and how will it happen? 3. The current status of the low carbon sector in the North West 4. How will the rest of our economy be affected by the transition to a Low Carbon Economy? 5. What skills do we need to deliver a Low Carbon Economy? 6. Rapidly changing economic context for Low Carbon Economy 7. What do Local Authorities, LSPs and LEPs need to do now? 8. Strengthening links between the Low Carbon Economy and economic development activities a) Understanding how low carbon can drive the local economy b) Finding out what is happening already c) Identifying what you need to do 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Application for Planning Permission. Town and Country Planning Act 1990
    Application for Planning Permission. Town and Country Planning Act 1990 Publication of applications on planning authority websites. Please note that the information provided on this application form and in supporting documents may be published on the Authority’s website. If you require any further clarification, please contact the Authority’s planning department. 1. Applicant Name, Address and Contact Details Title: Mr First name: Tim Surname: Blackshaw Company name Country National Extension Street address: Walnut Tree Farm Code Number Number Northwich Road Telephone number: Lower Stretton Mobile number: Town/City Warrington Fax number: County: Country: Email address: Postcode: WA4 4PG Are you an agent acting on behalf of the applicant? Yes No 2. Agent Name, Address and Contact Details Title: Ms First Name: Sally Surname: Bowdler Company name: CMS UK Country National Extension Street address: CMS UK The Old Dairy Code Number Number Spring Farm Business Centre Telephone number: 01270 522645 Moss Lane Minshull Vernon Mobile number: Town/City Crewe Fax number: County: Cheshire Country: United Kingdom Email address: Postcode: CW1 4RJ [email protected] 3. Description of the Proposal Please describe the proposed development including any change of use: Installation of a single wind turbine in a field to the west of Walnut Tree Farm to generate and supply Walnut Tree Farm with renewable energy. Has the building, work or change of use already started? Yes No Ref: 04: 2309 Planning Portal Reference: 4. Site Address Details Full postal address of the site (including full postcode where available) Description: House: Suffix: Installation of a single wind turbine in a field to the west of Walnut Tree Farm to generate and supply Walnut Tree Farm with renewable energy.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LAND Is the Northwest Hydropower Heaven? Why We Love Our Allotments
    ISSUE SEVENTEEN SUMMER 2008 PUBLISHED BY THE MERSEY BASIN CAMPAIGN WWW.MERSEYBASIN.ORG.UK SAVING RATTY In search of the humble water vole. BACK TO WEIR-ED AND WONDERFUL THE LAND Is the Northwest hydropower heaven? Why we love our allotments. www.merseybasin.org.uk Unilever Dragonfl y Awards 2008 Nomination Form Do you know an unsung Unilever & the Mersey Basin Campaign As well as the category winners, are looking for this year’s best the judges will select an overall hero who deserves a pat on environmental volunteers – groups and winner, who will receive a unique the back? Could your school individuals who’ve shown exceptional trophy and a cheque for £2500. or voluntary group use a commitment, worked with their Category winners will each receive cash prize to put towards community, and delivered an innovative a trophy and £1000 towards their or exciting project in their area. work. All nominees must be based an environmental project? in the Mersey or Ribble river areas. The judges have £6000 worth of prize money to hand out to help volunteers HOW TO ENTER fund new and ongoing projects that support the aims of the Mersey Basin We’ve tried to keep the nomination Campaign; improved water quality, process simple. Just use the boxes waterside regeneration and community below to tell us who you are, who you’d engagement. like to nominate, and why you think they should win an award. Feel free to add extra sheets if you need them, and to We’re looking for nominations send us photos, reports, press cuttings in three categories: or anything else you think will help the 1 Young people.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmentally Sustainable Procurement – Putting Policy Into Practice
    Simple Steps to Environmentally Sustainable Procurement – Putting Policy into Practice A guidance document for public sector organisations in the North West www.clasp-nw.info Putting Policy into Practice | Procurement Project ‘How to use this Guide’ Sustainability was recently identified in the Procurement Intelligence Unit's CPO Strategy Survey 2011 as ‘one of the dominant 'megatrends' that will underpin procurement activity increasingly in years to come’. This document is a practical guide to help public sector organisations adopt ‘green’, or ‘environmentally sustainable’, alternatives within their procurement processes. It is packed with useful sources of information, real life case studies, example contract tender clauses and links to further websites, to demonstrate the steps that can be taken towards more environmentally sustainable procurement practices1. It is worth saying here that sustainable procurement is, of course, far more encompassing than the remit of this project, which is focused primarily on the low carbon angle. Thus, this Guide must be considered as only one piece of the sustainable procurement jigsaw. The information and reference sources contained within this Guide can be used, or adapted as appropriate to your individual organisation’s requirements, to assist with: • Staff training/inductions – to raise awareness of sustainable procurement • Engagement with senior management – to raise awareness of the organisational benefits of procuring more sustainably • Engagement with category managers – to demonstrate how what they purchase contributes to sustainability • Supporting the transformation of policy commitments into action! 1 This document does not deal with the application of procurement law. All the guidance provided in the document should be applied in a manner consistent with the requirements of procurement law including, without limitation, the Public Contracts Regulations 2006 (as amended) and the EC law principles of equal treatment, transparency and proportionality.
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpool City Region Renewable Energy Capacity Study (Stage 1)
    < RENEWABLE ENERGY CAPACITY STUDY Liverpool City Region Stage One Report Liverpool City Region Arup Renewalbe Energy Capacity Study - Stage One Report December 09 1 INTroDUCTION 4 CONTENTS 2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 8 3 REVIEW OF RENEWABLE ENERGY TARGETS For THE STUDY AREA 11 4 STRATEGIC PLANNING AssEssMENT 16 5 RENEWABLE ENERGY AND THE EcoNOMY 22 6 A REVIEW OF RENEWABLE TECHNOLOGIES 31 7 STRATEGIC REVIEW OF ENERGY REsoUrcE AND ENERGY DEMAND POTENTIAL 36 8 DISTRIBUTED ENERGY POTENTIAL 41 9 BUILDING INTEGRATED ENERGY PoTENTIAL 46 10 ADDITIONAL TARGETED TECHNOLOGY OPPorTUNITIES 49 11 SUB-REGION AND LocAL AUTHorITY OPTIONS APPRAISAL 52 12 coNCLUSIONS AND REcoMMENDATIONs 56 FILE NAME DATE APPENDICES Renewable Energy Capacity 08/12/09 Appendix A Overview of Renewable Energy 62 Study Technologies PREPARED BY SIGNATURE Appendix B Local Authority Policy Review 77 Project Team Appendix C Overview of Policy and NW Renewable 98 CHECKED BY SIGNATURE Energy Study Appendix D Constraints Mapping 103 Mark Anderson Stephen Pimlott Appendix E The North West Renewable Energy Industry 124 APProVED BY SIGNATURE Appendix F Economic Drivers, economic and skills 127 Jane Healey Brown profile Appendix G Consultation with Local Businesses 132 Appendix H Interventions for Developing a Renewable 137 Energy study Appendi I Glossary of Terms 143 Liverpool City Region 3 Arup Renewable Energy Capacity Study - Stage One Report December 09 < 1. INTroDUCTION Liverpool City Region 4 Arup Renewable Energy Capacity Study - Stage One Report December 09 1.1 INTroDUCTION policies and programmes that have implications for The need for action to tackle climate change, reduce the Liverpool City Region and Warrington.
    [Show full text]