THE LAND Is the Northwest Hydropower Heaven? Why We Love Our Allotments

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE LAND Is the Northwest Hydropower Heaven? Why We Love Our Allotments ISSUE SEVENTEEN SUMMER 2008 PUBLISHED BY THE MERSEY BASIN CAMPAIGN WWW.MERSEYBASIN.ORG.UK SAVING RATTY In search of the humble water vole. BACK TO WEIR-ED AND WONDERFUL THE LAND Is the Northwest hydropower heaven? Why we love our allotments. www.merseybasin.org.uk Unilever Dragonfl y Awards 2008 Nomination Form Do you know an unsung Unilever & the Mersey Basin Campaign As well as the category winners, are looking for this year’s best the judges will select an overall hero who deserves a pat on environmental volunteers – groups and winner, who will receive a unique the back? Could your school individuals who’ve shown exceptional trophy and a cheque for £2500. or voluntary group use a commitment, worked with their Category winners will each receive cash prize to put towards community, and delivered an innovative a trophy and £1000 towards their or exciting project in their area. work. All nominees must be based an environmental project? in the Mersey or Ribble river areas. The judges have £6000 worth of prize money to hand out to help volunteers HOW TO ENTER fund new and ongoing projects that support the aims of the Mersey Basin We’ve tried to keep the nomination Campaign; improved water quality, process simple. Just use the boxes waterside regeneration and community below to tell us who you are, who you’d engagement. like to nominate, and why you think they should win an award. Feel free to add extra sheets if you need them, and to We’re looking for nominations send us photos, reports, press cuttings in three categories: or anything else you think will help the 1 Young people. judges to build up a picture of the work 2 Individual. that’s being done. 3 Group. NOMINATIONS PART ONE: About yourself PART TWO: About your nominee(s) If you would like to Name Name of the group or individual you’d like to nominate make a nomination please complete and return this form by Address 12th September 2008. Please return your Category you’re entering (please tick one) completed form to: Bev Mitchell, Community YOUNG INDIVIDUAL GROUP Support Coordinator, PEOPLE Mersey Basin Campaign, Fourways House, 57 Hilton Street, Finally, please use additional sheets to explain why you think they deserve an award. Manchester M1 2EJ. Telephone Send your sheet, along with this form to Bev Mitchel or email to: using the contact details to the left of these boxes. b.mitchell@ merseybasin.org.uk Email SourceNW is the magazine of the Mersey Basin Campaign. The campaign works towards better water quality and sustainable waterside regeneration for the rivers and waterways of England’s Northwest. www.merseybasin.org.uk The late great Tony Wilson and his partner Yvette Livesey once graced CONTENTS the cover of Features Regulars this magazine. They are the only celebrities I’ve ever managed to 12 BACK TO THE LAND 4 REGIONAL ROUND UP News, sound bites, people, places, facts & fi gures and feature in Source, and Wilson fi red Once about as trendy as a bale of twine, more from around the Northwest. Plus Love and Hate. off the most expletive fi lled email allotments are enjoying a remarkable I have ever received in my life resurgence. David Ward reports on the 10 CASE NOTES because of it. battle to save them from development How Tipkinder Park helped a budding Olympian He was right, too. We’d and meets the people who have fallen with her BMX dreams. reviewed a report he and Livesey under the allotment spell. had produced on the regeneration 11 HOW GREEN IS MY…SCHOOL? of East Lancashire, in which we 16 WEIR-ED AND WONDERFUL How a Cumbria school aced its eco-exams. were gently mocking of some The Northwest has huge untapped potential of their ideas. We had, however, for low carbon energy – by returning to its 20 SPOTLIGHT completely failed to talk to waterpowered roots. Jason Teasdale reports One of Britain’s leading environmentalists tells us either of them. And then put from New Mills. where the environmental movement is heading. them on the cover. Hence Tony’s typically forthright 22 SAVING RATTY 21 BUSINESS email. I kept it, of course, and am How rising global oil prices are creating opportunities One of Britain’s most threatened species now oddly proud of it. It taught me for one Northwest business. is enjoying a cautious recovery thanks to to take my editorial responsibilities dedicated protection. Jim Fair searches both far more seriously. 27 SHARP END town and country for the reclusive water vole. One of those ideas that raised Reject the glib green promises of ‘greenwash’, urges Steve Connor. a chuckle at the time was that the earthy allotment owners of towns like Blackburn and Burnley and Bolton might be encouraged to erect designer sheds on their plots. Regeneration by allotment beautifi cation seemed a truly novel concept. Almost inevitably, Wilson was right all along. Now, three years after their report, Dreaming of Pennine Lancashire, he and Livesey’s insight has proved visionary, and allotments are 12 16 22 enjoying a resurgence in popularity. Our original reporter Subscriptions: Fouzia Bhatti, 0161 242 8200 Website: www.merseybasin.org.uk revisits the theme in a wonderful [email protected] Design: Hemisphere, Manchester story starting on page 12. Contributors: Jo Birtwistle, Edwin Colyer, Jim Fair, Kate Fox, Print: Gyroscope, Manchester Mark Hillsdon, Ciara Leeming, Louise Tickle, David Ward. SourceNW is published quarterly by the Mersey Basin Campaign. Matthew Sutcliffe, editor Photography: Rebecca Lupton. The opinions expressed in this magazine are not necessarily those of the [email protected] Address: Mersey Basin Campaign, Fourways House, publishers. Comments, letters and corrections are welcomed and should be 57 Hilton Street, Manchester M1 2EJ addressed to the editor. SourceNW is printed on 100% post-consumer waste recycled paper using vegetable-based inks. SourceNW is sponsored by Mersey Basin Campaign corporate sponsors include REGIONAL ROUND-UP Kiss me quick How do Northwest beaches rank against the best in the country this summer? The organisation behind the world’s most prestigious “Now is the time for the English to rekindle This year’s guide shows a ten percent seaside awards says its time for holidaymakers their passion for traditional beach holidays in fall in the number of beaches around to fall back in love with our traditional English this country. “We are challenging people to the country reaching the highest resorts – despite not granting a single Blue Flag avoid overseas air travel and be kind to the water quality standards – the largest award to a Northwest beach. environment by holidaying at home.” drop in the guide’s 21-year history. Keep Britain Tidy, which runs the international Air travel is one of the fastest growing sources Thomas Bell, MCS coastal awards scheme in the UK, handed out a near-record of carbon emissions. pollution offi cer, said: “These latest 82 Blue Flags this summer, but none in the Northwest. The number awarded around the country has nearly Beaches at Southport, Ainsdale and Blackpool doubled in the last six years, but was three less have won Quality Beach Awards. than last year. Dickie Felton, media manager at Keep Britain results buck the long term trend “ Now is the time for the Tidy, added: “We’d love to see beaches like of cleaner bathing water but we’re Blackpool and Southport getting Blue Flags pinning the blame squarely on last English to rekindle their and there’s every chance they will do in the summer’s exceptionally bad weather. passion for traditional beach near future.” “Heavy rain sweeps pollutants According the Marine Conservation Society like raw sewage, street debris and holidays in this country.” (MCS), which produces the country’s other animal waste directly from the land beach bible, the Good Beach Guide, last year’s into rivers and the sea. Blue Flags are only given to beaches that are record breaking wet summer was to blame for The latest Good Beach Guide litter-free and have good access, top-notch facilities falling water quality. still manages to recommend 443 and clean seawater. beaches – more than double the However, three Northwest beaches, Blackpool number recommended in the 2000 South, Ainsdale and Southport, did win Quality Beach edition, suggesting that the £20 Awards. These are given to the best beaches in the billion invested by the water industry country that are well managed but may not reach has brought permanent benefi t to Blue Flag standards for water quality. Britain’s beaches. Keep Britain Tidy chief executive, Phil Barton, said: It also welcomes the completion “We keep being told that our love affair with the seaside by United Utilities of storm water has been on the rocks. But as far as we are concerned storage schemes at Southport, England’s beach resorts go from strength to strength. New Brighton and Preesall. SOUND BITES £125,000 design may be onto a winner. The company behind the eco-friendly rooms at the University of Lancaster. The timber framed fl ower, London-based Tonkin Liu, is best known for its award winning townhouses and fl ats were built using a low waste, energy effi cient Mellow yellow. A 12m high, Singing Ringing Tree panopticon overlooking Burnley. process, and the scheme includes rooftop solar thermal panels bright yellow fl ower sculpture to heat water. The wood used in the construction comes from topped with a 3m wide bloom Tipped over. An old dumping ground in St Helens is disappearing sustainably managed forests and the buildings are highly insulated. made of yellow Perspex petals beneath lush woodland as part of a £2.1 million regeneration Inside, a smart ventilation system supplies fresh air whilst also which gently fl utter and light scheme.
Recommended publications
  • NW Regional Technical Advisory Body 3Rd
    North West Regional Technical Advisory Body 3rd Waste Management Monitoring Report Working towards sustainable waste management in the North West August 2007 Contents Foreword . .2 Executive summary . .3 1. Introduction . .4 2. Municipal waste . .7 3. Commercial and industrial waste . .15 4. Construction, demolition and excavation waste . .19 5. Management of waste at facilities and sites . .20 6. Fly-tipping and enforcement . .27 7. Special waste . .29 8. Agricultural waste . .32 9. Radioactive waste . .33 10. Identification of waste management facilities of national, regional and sub-regional significance . .34 Glossary . .35 Abbreviations . .36 Technical Appendices 1. Additional tables and figures . .38 2. Progress report on implementation of the North West Regional Waste Strategy Action Plan . .44 Photo credits Front cover top: Merseyside Objective 1Programme Front cover bottom: Envirolink Northwest Back cover top: David Jones Photography/Merseyside Waste Disposal Authority 3rd Annual Monitoring Report – Working towards sustainable waste management in the North West 1 August 2007 Foreword The North West Regional Technical Advisory Body (NWRTAB) is (Environment Agency). This has produced a report with broader publishing its 3rd Annual Monitoring Report. This year we have scope and hopefully a better read. sought to broaden the appeal of the document and extend its scope The report covers a period of considerable activity on both policy to encompass matters wider than just core statistics about waste making and development and practical waste management, which activity in the North West. includes: The core purpose of the NWRTAB is to collect, collate and interpret o Movement of the draft Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS) through its data and other information about waste activity in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Science and Technology in Society (SATIS) Book 6
    , SCIENCE & 1 - TECHNOLOGY 0 IN SOCIETY ~ • • • ABOUT SATIS Science and Technology in Society units are designed to be used in conjunction with conventional science courses, particularly those leading to GCSE examinations. Each unit has links to major science topics as well as exploring important social and technological applications and issues. The units are self-contained and generally require about 2 periods (around 75 minutes) of classroom time. Each unit comprises Teachers' Notes (blue sheets) and Students' materials (white sheets). Full guidance on use is given in the Teachers' Notes accompanying each unit, which also include background information and suggest further resources. Each SATIS book contains ten units. The units are numbered in a system giving the number of the book followed by the number of the unit within that book. Thus the first unit in the first SATIS book is numbered 10l. In addition to the SATIS books, a general Teacher's Guide to the project is available, giving guidance on some of the teaching techniques involved as well as ideas for further activities. Many people from schools, universities,. industry and the professions have contributed to the writing, development and trials of the SATIS project. A full list of contributors appears in the Teachers' Guide. The material which follows may be reproduced without infringing copyright provided reproduction isfor student use only. The permission of the publishers must be obtained before reproducing the material for any other purpose. First published 1986 by The Association
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Railways July 2019
    The R.C.T.S. is a Charitable Incorporated Organisation registered with The Charities Commission Registered No. 1169995. THE RAILWAY CORRESPONDENCE AND TRAVEL SOCIETY PHOTOGRAPHIC LIST LIST 7 - INDUSTRIAL RAILWAYS JULY 2019 The R.C.T.S. is a Charitable Incorporated Organisation registered with The Charities Commission Registered No. 1169995. www.rcts.org.uk VAT REGISTERED No. 197 3433 35 R.C.T.S. PHOTOGRAPHS – ORDERING INFORMATION The Society has a collection of images dating from pre-war up to the present day. The images, which are mainly the work of late members, are arranged in in fourteen lists shown below. The full set of lists covers upwards of 46,900 images. They are : List 1A Steam locomotives (BR & Miscellaneous Companies) List 1B Steam locomotives (GWR & Constituent Companies) List 1C Steam locomotives (LMS & Constituent Companies) List 1D Steam locomotives (LNER & Constituent Companies) List 1E Steam locomotives (SR & Constituent Companies) List 2 Diesel locomotives, DMUs & Gas Turbine Locomotives List 3 Electric Locomotives, EMUs, Trams & Trolleybuses List 4 Coaching stock List 5 Rolling stock (other than coaches) List 6 Buildings & Infrastructure (including signalling) List 7 Industrial Railways List 8 Overseas Railways & Trams List 9 Miscellaneous Subjects (including Railway Coats of Arms) List 10 Reserve List (Including unidentified images) LISTS Lists may be downloaded from the website http://www.rcts.org.uk/features/archive/. PRICING AND ORDERING INFORMATION Prints and images are now produced by ZenFolio via the website. Refer to the website (http://www.rcts.org.uk/features/archive/) for current prices and information. NOTES ON THE LISTS 1. Colour photographs are identified by a ‘C’ after the reference number.
    [Show full text]
  • Biomass Task Force Report to Government • October 2005 Standing – Nikki Macleod, David Clayton, Rebecca Cowburn
    Biomass Task Force Report To Government • October 2005 Standing – Nikki MacLeod, David Clayton, Rebecca Cowburn. Seated – John Roberts CBE, Sir Ben Gill CBE, Nick Hartley FOREWORD by Sir Ben Gill The challenge set for the Task Force was to make proposals to optimise the contribution of biomass to a range of targets and policies set by the Government. In setting out the case for biomass we noted that the Energy White Paper contained clear aspirations about renewable energy, security of supply, competitiveness and fuel poverty. The Government also has the important objectives of sustainable development and sustainable farming, forestry and woodland management. Taken together, all of these aims can deliver environmental improvement and also economic benefit particularly in rural and other areas. Our work has shown that the potential of biomass is significant. We have taken the real contribution it can make to the climate change agenda as the primary driver. In putting in place a programme of actions to deliver biomass energy there is a critical need for a strategic approach by the Government to enable the potential to be exploited. We focus on the fact that in spite of more than one-third of primary energy being used for heat there has been a lack of recognition of the role of renewable heat in policy delivery. The approach could be characterised as - no targets; no concerted policy; no strategy; and, limited support for development. So far as DTI’s Energy White Paper is concerned there was a missed opportunity to develop targets for renewable heat and this has perpetuated an inconsistency of approach in Government and in the Regions.
    [Show full text]
  • SECTION 2.Cdr
    Tal IF THE BOFFINS, BRAIN QUESTIONS STILL NEE EDUCATION, TO COM CHALLENGES? IF WE T IN THE TECHNO-ADVA NEEDED TO BRING TH THE FRONT PAGES, FR PUT THESE QUESTION WORDS BY AMANDA WOOD talking technology stimulating science despite the northwest having excellent facilities, it’s time to pr research money is being poured into the south east. If necessity is the mot it makes absolutely no sense at all to do this. the UK putting enough in what is the wealthiest part of the country, housing is According to David Cl costly and therefore scientists’ wage costs are high. Engineering and Phys in the end it simply means that the money for research has yet to strengthen doesn’t go as far as it could do if it were located here.” tradition of funding re excellence across a w Geoffrey Piper,North West Business Leadership Team funding in mainstream is high, but the quantit Whilst high-tech indus refining their technolo to move too far away achieving funding for opportunity for the go But for Geoffrey Piper, Team, funds are being because of the geogra “Despite the Northwe for healthcare and me the South East,” he sa is the wealthiest part o wage costs are high. I doesn’t go as far as it As an example Geoffr of Manchester’s Chris into cancer treatment set-up and running co over Daresbury furthe “This is taxpayers’ mo *pic may change research across the b he added. 36 INDUSTRIAL EVOLUTION: THE SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE EDITION it’s time to pry open the public purse And this may be about to happen.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Deconstruction in Selected Countries
    CHAPTER 9 IMPLEMENTING DECONSTRUCTION IN THE UNITED STATES Charles J. Kibert, Abdol R. Chini and Jennifer L. Languell, M.E. Rinker, Sr. School of Building Construction, Center for Construction and Environment, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA SUMMARY Out of 260 million tons of non-industrial waste produced annually in the U.S., 136 million tons are a result of the construction and demolition industry. This equates to approximately 33% of the waste produced nationally. Similarly in the State of Florida, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) reports approximately 22% of the waste produced is a result of construction and demolition activities. In this report, Florida is used as an example of construction waste generation issue in the U.S. The process of deconstruction (the disassembly of structures for the purpose of reusing components and building materials) can significantly decrease the national solid waste burden the construction industry places on the environment. Through deconstruction, natural resources are saved, employment and training opportunities are created, and local businesses are developed that use the materials diverted from landfills. Deconstruction supplies useful materials to building materials yards, recycling centers, and remanufacturing enterprises, creating additional jobs and community revenue. This report investigates and analyzes issues related to the feasibility of replacing demolition and landfilling of building materials with deconstruction and reuse in the U.S. The report
    [Show full text]
  • Comments on Issues Relating to Need Arising from the Responses to the Second Round of Questions
    ARROW 9 Your ref WS010003 ARROW ref 10024954 Nicola Escott ref 10024302 ARROW 9 – Comments on issues relating to Need arising from the responses to the Second Round of Questions Alan Watson (Public Interest Consultants) 1. This note responds to some of the issues arising from comments sent to the ExA on 2nd September 2014 by MJCA on behalf of Whitemoss responding to the Second Round of question. Trends in Hazardous Waste Landfill Question 3.1 Asked the Applicant, EA: “the NPS (Hazardous Waste 2010: England and Wales below para 3.2.7) indicates some 500,000 tonnes of hazardous waste being disposed of in landfill in 2010, following a significant fall in earlier years. In the applicant’s planning statement at para 8.9 and Appendix PS A, hazardous waste deposited for England and Wales in 2012 is shown as being about 4.25 million tonnes, with 716,463 tonnes recorded for the North West region. Of this, 872,436 tonnes in England and Wales was sent to landfill, with 54,955 tonnes to landfill in the North West. Does the EA agree the applicant’s figures? Can data be provided and agreed for hazardous waste for the last five years showing the amount disposed of in landfill in: i. England ii. North West iii. Lancashire 2. Accordingly the Environment Agency response included trend data for hazardous waste landfilled in these areas (p6 of 2nd September response): 3. The MJCA response was consistent with this for Lancashire but different for the North West. The request by the ExA was for data to be provided 1 ARROW 9 (and agreed) for hazardous waste for the last five years showing the amount disposed of in landfill in: i.
    [Show full text]
  • Uk Regional Development Programme 1986-90
    EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND UK REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 1986-90 Section 7E: England — South Yorkshire Section 7F: England — Workington Section 7G: England — Greater Manchester Section 7H: England — Greater Merseyside lUlaUmiãl· I U If ΦΟ DOCUMENT DOCUMENTI CUMENT DOCUMENTO DOK1 ¡NT ΕΓΓΡΑΦΟ DOCUMENT DI JMENTO DOCUMENT UUCUM TU ηυκυΜΕΝΤΕΓΓΡΑΦΟηΐ (MENT DOCUMENTO OUCUMI MHB ΡΑΦΟΟΟΟΟΜΕΜ I tvivl COMMISSION POOGIIIÌEN^DOG OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ΝΤΕΓΓΡΑΦ( uranFrinii nni-iiupuiiiAnAni This document has been prepared for use within the Commission. It does not necessarily represent the Commission's official position. Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1987 Vol.3 : ISBN 92-825-7194-7 Vol. 1-7: ISBN 92-825-7199-8 Catalogue number: CB-98-87-00J-EN-C © ECSC-EEC-EAEC, Brussels · Luxembourg, 1987 Reproduction is authorized, except for commercial purposes, provided the source is acknowledged. Printed in Belgium Commission of the European Communities European Regional Development Fund UK RE6I0NAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 1986-90 Section 7E: EngLand - South Yorkshire Section 7F: EngLand - Workington Section 7G: EngLand - Greater Manchester Section 7H: EngLand - Greater Merseyside Document This document has been prepared for use within the Commission. It does not necessarily represent the Commission's official position. Copyright ECSC-EEC-EAEC, Brussels - Luxembourg, 1987 Reproduction is authorized, except for commercial purposes, provided the source is acknowledged. / L European Regional Development Fund UK REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 1986-90 Section 7E: England - South Yorkshire d UCJ [ \j \ 1' UK REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 1986-90 CONTENTS The Programme consists of detailed information on regional or sub-regional areas (Sections 7 to 10) preceded by general information on the United Kingdom (Sections 1 to 6).
    [Show full text]
  • WIGANLOCALDEVELOPMENTFRAMEWORK Core Strategy Preferred Options Report (June 2009) Wigan Council LDF
    WIGANLOCALDEVELOPMENTFRAMEWORK Core Strategy Preferred Options Report (June 2009) Wigan Council LDF Contents ONE Introduction 3 TWO How to get involved 8 THREE Spatial portrait 11 A 'spatial portrait' of Wigan Borough 11 Wigan 17 Standish, Aspull & Shevington 19 Orrell and Billinge 21 Ashton and Bryn 23 Golborne and Lowton 24 Leigh 26 Atherton 28 Tyldesley and Astley 30 Hindley and Abram 32 FOUR Key issues 35 FIVE Key evidence 37 SIX Spatial vision 41 SEVEN Strategic objectives and monitoring 43 EIGHT Choosing our preferred options 65 NINE Our preferred spatial policies 67 TEN Our preferred core policies 115 ELEVEN Our preferred development management policies 179 WIGANLOCALDEVELOPMENTFRAMEWORK Core Strategy Preferred Options Report (June 2009) Wigan Council LDF TWELVE The alternative spatial options 196 Focus on the east of the borough 196 Focus on the west of the borough 200 Focus on the outer areas of the borough 203 Disperse development across the borough 205 THIRTEEN Next steps 209 A Changes to the proposals map: conservation areas 211 B Changes to the proposals map: sites of biological importance 217 WIGANLOCALDEVELOPMENTFRAMEWORK Core Strategy Preferred Options Report (June 2009) Wigan Council LDF ONE Introduction 1.1 Welcome to the second ‘formal’ stage in the preparation of Wigan’s Local Development Framework Core Strategy - our 'Preferred Options'. It follows on from the previous 'Issues and Options' stage that we consulted widely on in February – April 2008 and builds on the contributions made at that stage and our wider findings. It is again a genuine opportunity for people who live in the borough and other ‘stakeholders’ to get involved in shaping how the borough will work and look in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Project Report to Defra Sustainable Procurement Task Force Secretariat
    Pilot OpenStrategy® for Sustainable Procurement in the North West Final Project Report to Defra Sustainable Procurement Task Force Secretariat Prepared by: Matthew Wilkinson Sustainable Development Policy Team North West Regional Assembly Wigan Investment Centre Waterside Drive Wigan WN3 5BA Tel: 01942 776724 [email protected] Executive Summary This is the final project report of the Pilot phase of the OpenStrategy® (OS) for sustainable procurement in the North West. This has been funded jointly by Defra’s Sustainable Procurement Task Force (SPTF) Secretariat, North West Regional Assembly (NWRA) and Northwest Regional Development Agency (NWDA). In August 2005, these organisations embarked on a project to provide a basis for a sustainable procurement strategy for the North West using the OpenStrategy® technique. This document is complemented by an Independent Evaluation Report of the OS technique by Forum for the Future (Forum), using this pilot as the primary case study, whilst also drawing upon other applications across the country. The report is available from the Forum for the Future website1. The overall aims of this project were to pilot the OS technique and, in the process, work towards the development of a sustainable procurement strategy for the North West region. A total of 11 stakeholders were engaged with this process and the pilot was supported over a period from the end of September 2005 to May 2006. The OpenStrategy® (OS) system offers a new and innovative approach to multiple stakeholder associations that enables the processes of communication, negotiation, prioritisation and agreement. It is specifically designed to facilitate these processes in partnerships where large numbers of organisations reside.
    [Show full text]
  • New White Shirts
    Waste. It’s one of our greatest regional challenges. England’s Northwest produces almost four million tonnes of municipal waste each year and, if our collectively wasteful behaviour continues unabated, that figure is set to double by 2020. The pressure is on and the rubbish is piling up. Behind every Resourceful tonne of waste that tumbles into our landfill sites lie many more tonnes of precious resources we simply can’t afford to squander, not to mention the release of greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide and methane. Our region’s landfill sites are filling at an alarming rate, with only five years of capacity left, solutions and ever-greater pressure is being placed on businesses, local authorities and individuals to clean up their act. Greater Manchester Waste Ltd (GMW) - the largest waste disposal and management company owned and controlled by from GMW a local authority - is one of the key players when it comes to addressing the problem of waste. GMW manages and disposes of waste as carefully and responsibly as possible but, crucially, it is also looking at ways to conserve resources, reduce waste levels and contribute to the sustainable development of England’s Northwest. The company’s Thermal Recovery Facility in Bolton is one development that GMW considers an important contribution to sustainability.The plant handles 120,000 tonnes of waste each year and from this waste generates 10MW of electricity - enough to heat 7,000 homes. Plans for an associated, local, district heating system are currently being discussed, and the ash from the facility is being recovered with the aim of reusing it in the construction industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Greatest Hits for Low Carbon Economic Development.Pdf
    Northwest England Greatest Hits Briefings | January 2011 No.5 Greatest Hits for Low Carbon Economic Development Delivering the Low Carbon Economy through local authority economic development and regeneration in local areas This briefing is intended as a guide to the Low Carbon Economy in the North West. It summarises key points from regional research, strategies, sub-regional documents and effective practice. Its intended audience is people working in economic development, regeneration, planning and development, policy, sustainability as well as council members and those who are supporting businesses and involved in establishing Local Economic Partnerships (LEPs). The briefing provides practical information support and is linked to a detailed research report Developing Strong Links Between the Low Carbon Economy and Economic Development in Local Authorities. Download the full report from http://www.climatechangenorthwest.co.uk/assets/_files/documents/dec_10/cli__1293054218 _FINAL_REPORT_CLASP_-_Interim_E.pdf Contents: (Click to navigate) 1. Background 2. What is the Low Carbon Economy and how will it happen? 3. The current status of the low carbon sector in the North West 4. How will the rest of our economy be affected by the transition to a Low Carbon Economy? 5. What skills do we need to deliver a Low Carbon Economy? 6. Rapidly changing economic context for Low Carbon Economy 7. What do Local Authorities, LSPs and LEPs need to do now? 8. Strengthening links between the Low Carbon Economy and economic development activities a) Understanding how low carbon can drive the local economy b) Finding out what is happening already c) Identifying what you need to do 9.
    [Show full text]