An Internal Critique

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Internal Critique THOMAS HILL GREEN AND THE PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS OF POLITICS: An Internal Critique. By Mr. Colin Tyler B.A. (Hons.), M.A. (Ebor) Submitted as a Requirement of the DPhil in Politics University of York Department of Politics January, 1996 Abstract. This thesis presents an internal critique of the philosophical system of Thomas Hill Green (1836-1882) emphasizing his ethical and political thought. The Introduction questions recent allegations that Green's assumptions make his thought irrelevant in modem circumstances. His methodology is sketched and shown to be separable from his Christianity. Chapter one examines the role of consciousness in knowing. The specifically religious aspects of "the eternal consciousness" are shown to be dispensable. Chapter two examines his theory of the will. That he runs two mutually exclusive theories simultaneously undermines the system's coherence. Neo-Aristotelianism entails voluntarism whereas spiritual determinism rejects it, raising serious questions about the status of Green's ethical thought. The chapter concludes by noting that Green follows the neo-Aristotelian line fairly consistently in his moral and political writings. Chapter three sets out Green's "relational organicist" social theory, committing him to conceive the true good as a common good. Several objections are defeated, before the issue of social fragmentation is introduced. Chapter four examines conscientious agency and social criticism, defending Green from charges of vagueness. His belief in progress is shown to be unwarranted. Chapter five examines his political philosophy, beginning with the links between recognition, rights and the exclusion of certain entities from the sphere of rights. His theory of "the state" is shown to be compatible with cultural pluralism. Democracy, state intervention and civil disobedience are considered. Doubts are raised about how far Green's theory of the state actually allows him to avoid authoritarianism. The implications for his political philosophy of the spiritual determinist theory of the will are sketched. Chapter six examines Green's conception of the natural right to private property, emphasizing its contextual preconditions. His principles are shown to be compatible with radical reforms of the economic system. The Conclusion argues that, for all its faults, Green's system remains valuable when developing ethical and political philosophy. 2 Contents Abstract ............................................................ 2 Contents ........................................................... 3 Dedication . .. 6 Preface ............................................................. 7 Disclaimer . 7 Acknowledgements ................................................... 8 Declaration. 9 INTRODUCTION .................................................. 10 1. Introduction.. 10 2. An Outline of Green's 'Question' and Method ................... 12 3. The Religious Basis of Green's Philosophy. .................... 16 KNOWLEDGE AS SELF-REALISATION ................................ 19 1. Introduction . 19 2. Green's Starting-Point .................................... 21 3. Green's Idealism, and the Problem of Sensations ................ 23 4. Experience and Relations .................................. 26 5. Knowledge and the Eternal Consciousness ..................... 35 6. Conclusion ............................................. 40 SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS, VOLUNTARISM AND THE WILL ............... 42 1. Introduction ............................................ 42 2. Aristotle's Theory of Moral Agency .......................... 4-4- 3. Green's Concept of 'Distinctively Human Action' ................ 48 3 4. Positive Freedom as Autonomy ............................. 57 5. The 'Determinist'/' Indeterminist' Debate ...................... 65 6. Green's Spiritual Determinism and the Self-Realisation of the Eternal Consciousness .......................................... 67 7. The Collapse of Moral Responsibility ......................... 73 8. Conclusion.. 77 RELATIONAL ORGANICISM AND THE COMMON GOOD ................ 80 1. Introduction.. 80 2. Simhony's Categories ..................................... 81 3. Morality and The True Good. 83 4. The True Good and Social Embeddedness ...................... 89 5. The Formal Structure of the Common Good . 99 6. The Non-Competitiveness of the Common Good ................ 108 7. The Substance of the Common Good: Citizenship and Public Service 113 8. Conceptual Confusion and Authoritarianism. ................. 123 9. Conclusion: The Problem of Social Fragmentation ............... 133 CONSCIENCE, SOCIAL CRITICISM AND PROGRESS ................... 137 1. Introduction . .. 137 2. Self-Alienation as the Motor of Reform ...................... 138 3. The spriritual deterministConscientious Action . 140 4. The Problems with Green's Theory of Progress . 154 5. The Spiritual Determinist Theory of Moral Development ......... 160 6. Conclusion ............................................ 164 RIGHTS AND THE STATE .......................................... 165 1. Introduction.. .. 165 2. Rights and Recognition. .................................. 167 3. Entities which Cannot Possess Rights ........................ 181 4. The State and Cultural Diversity . .. 185 5. Participatory Democracy and State Intervention. .............. 197 4 6. Social Change and Civil Disobedience ........................ 207 7. The Downfall of Green' s Liberalism? ........................ 216 8. Conclusion: Spiritual Determinism ........................... 219 THE ETHICAL POTENTIAL OF THE ECONOMIC REALM ............... 221 1. Introduction.. 221 2. Private Property and Capitalism. 221 3. The Origins of the Present Evils of Capitalism .................. 232 4. The Naivety and Flexibility of Green's Analysis ................ 237 CONCLUSION .................................................... 243 BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................................. 246 1. Thomas Hill Green . 246 2. Other Sources ......................................... 251 5 Immature minds delight in argumentation and fault-finding, because it is easy enough to fmd fault, though hard to see the good and its inner necessity. The learner always begins by finding fault, but the scholar sees the positive merit in everything. (Georg W F Hegel, 1967, The Philosophy of Right, translated by T M Knox, Oxford, Clarendon Press, paragraph 268A.) This thesis is dedicated to Jack for having to suffer the work for so long and to Ray Solly, who got me through my 0 Levels and stopped me from giving up on academia. 6 Preface. It is very strange to think that this thesis is finally finished. It has taken a great deal of work and a great deal of my life and attention for the past three years. I apologise to everyone who has had to suffer a boring conversation or two over that time because of my obsession with writing it. Over this time, I have gained a great deal of respect for those individuals who manage to retain their standards of scholarship in the face of increasing pressures to become a "learner" again. Unfortunately, the community of scholars continues to be in danger of becoming merely a collection of career academics. Disclaimer In the course of this thesis, I use the male pronoun to refer to the generic moral agent. I do this because Green does so. It should not be taken to imply that his thought applies only or even mainly to men. Green worked hard for women's rights and his philosophy logically entails equal recognition and treatment, irrespective of gender (see Anderson, 1991). Green's use of 'he' and 'his' is an expression of the academic conventions of his day rather than any sexism inherent in his writings. 7 Acknowledgements I would like to begin by thanking Mr. Peter P Nicholson for supervising this research. He has been very challenging, very encouraging and always very willing to share his knowledge, expertise and resources. Next, thanks are due to the Department of Politics at the University of York for employing me as a Teaching Assistant during the first year of my research. In particular, my gratitude goes to Prof. Rod Rhodes, Mrs. Susan Mendus, Mr. Peter Nicholson and Mr. John Horton for helping with the assistantship in various ways. Also, my thanks go to the British Academy for funding the rest of my research. Finally, Prof. Alex Callinicos and Mr. Philip Simison and Mr. John Curry helped to get that grant extended, for which obviously I am very grateful. In relation to Green's unpublished material, thanks go to Mr. Peter Nicholson for providing me with copies of Green's speeches which he has collated. Also, I would like to thank the Master and Fellows of Balliol College, Oxford for their permission to consult and quote from Green's papers. In particular, thanks go to Dr. Alan Tadiello for all of his help during my stay in Oxford between 9th and 13th January 1995, inclusive. I have benefitted from discussions with Matt Carter and Maria Dimova regarding British Idealism over the past couple of years for which I am grateful. I wish to thank all other members of the Political Theory Workshop (with a special mention for Susan Mendus) for the same reason. On a more personal level, I would like to thank Diane Adams, Steven Benson, Frank Brogan, Natalie Humphreys, Bernadette and Stewart Kirk, Andy McLellan, Michele Marin­ Dogan, Andrea Miccoci, Jeremy Nolan, Giuseppe Tassone, Andrew Tesseyman and Angie Wilson. Jenny Bradford, Linda Lofthouse, Caroline Moore and Gill Pulp her have all borne the interruptions of their work with good
Recommended publications
  • Humour in Nietzsche's Style
    Received: 15 May 2020 Accepted: 25 July 2020 DOI: 10.1111/ejop.12585 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Humour in Nietzsche's style Charles Boddicker University of Southampton, Southampton, UK Abstract Correspondence Nietzsche's writing style is designed to elicit affective Charles Boddicker, University of responses in his readers. Humour is one of the most common Southampton, Avenue Campus, Highfield Road, Southampton SO17 1BF, UK. means by which he attempts to engage his readers' affects. In Email: [email protected] this article, I explain how and why Nietzsche uses humour to achieve his philosophical ends. The article has three parts. In part 1, I reject interpretations of Nietzsche's humour on which he engages in self-parody in order to mitigate the charge of decadence or dogmatism by undermining his own philosophi- cal authority. In part 2, I look at how Nietzsche uses humour and laughter as a critical tool in his polemic against traditional morality. I argue that one important way in which Nietzsche uses humour is as a vehicle for enhancing the effectiveness of his ad hominem arguments. In part 3, I show how Nietzsche exploits humour's social dimension in order to find and culti- vate what he sees as the right kinds of readers for his works. Nietzsche is a unique figure in Western philosophy for the importance he places on laughter and humour. He is also unique for his affectively charged style, a style frequently designed to make the reader laugh. In this article, I am pri- marily concerned with the way in which Nietzsche uses humour, but I will inevitably discuss some of his more theo- retical remarks on the topic, as these cannot be neatly separated.
    [Show full text]
  • Humour and Caricature Teachers Notes Humour and Caricature
    Humour and Caricature Teachers Notes Humour and Caricature “We all love a good political cartoon. Whether we agree with the underlying sentiment or not, the biting wit and the sharp insight of a well-crafted caricature and its punch line are always deeply satisfying.” Peter Greste, Australian Journalist, Behind the Lines 2015 Foreward POINTS FOR DISCUSSION: Consider the meaning of the phrases “biting wit”, “sharp insight”, “well-crafted caricature”. Look up definitions if required. Do you agree with Peter Greste that people find political cartoons “deeply satisfying” even if they don’t agree with the cartoons underlying sentiment? Why/why not? 2 Humour and Caricature What’s so funny? Humour is an important part of most political cartoons. It’s a very effective way for The joke cartoonists to communicate their message to their audience can be simple or — and thereby help shape public opinion. multi-layered and complex. POINTS FOR DISCUSSION: “By distilling political arguments and criticisms into Do a quick exercise with your classmates — share a couple clear, easily digestible (and at times grossly caricatured) of jokes. Does everyone understand them? Why/why not? statements, they have oiled our political debate and What does this tell us about humour? helped shape public opinion”. Peter Greste, Australian Journalist, Behind the Lines foreward, http://behindthelines.moadoph.gov.au/2015/foreword. Why do you believe it’s important for cartoonists to make their cartoons easy to understand? What are some limitations readers could encounter which may hinder their understanding of the overall message? 3 Humour and Caricature Types of humour Cartoonists use different kinds of humour to communicate their message — the most common are irony, satire and sarcasm.
    [Show full text]
  • A Philosophical Discussion of Representation
    International Visual Literacy Association, Cheyenne, 1996 A PHILOSOPHICAL DISCUSSION OF REPRESENTATION One of the most basic theoretical areas in the study of visual communication and visual literacy is the nature of representation. Much of the discussion of this topic comes from either philosophy or aesthetics. This paper reviews some of the more important writings in this area in an attempt to develop a model of representation. The primary works reviewed include: E. H. Gombrich, "The Visual Image;" "Representation and Misrepresentation" Nelson Goodman, Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols, "Representation Re- presented" Paul Messaris, Visual Literacy: Image, Mind & Reality David Novitz, "Picturing" Marx Wartofsky, "Pictures, Representation, and Understanding;" "Visual Scenarios: The role of Representation in Visual Perception" Richard Wollheim, "Representation: The Philosophical Contribution to Psychology;" Pictures and Language;" and "Art, Interpretation, and Perception" In describing the requirements for a general theory of representation, Wollheim says it must answer two questions: What is it to represent? (what is the relationship between the representation and the something that it is of?) What, in the narrow sense of the term, is a representation? Using his two questions to guide our analysis, we find that the major theoretical issues that need to be investigated include: Is pictorial representation based on natural resemblance or convention? What is the relationship between pictures and reality? Finally, as part of this review, we are investigating if it is possible to develop an overriding theory of representation that accommodates the various issues and viewpoints. What is the relationship between pictures and reality? In beginning this discussion, let's first look at Wollheim's second question about what is a representation.
    [Show full text]
  • Paintings and Photographs, Introduction to "William Wegman" Curtis Carter Marquette University, [email protected]
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Philosophy Faculty Research and Publications Philosophy, Department of 1-1-2002 Paintings and Photographs, Introduction to "William Wegman" Curtis Carter Marquette University, [email protected] Published version. "Introduction," in William Wegman. Roman Zenner, 2002: 1-5. Permalink. © 2002 Roman Zenner. Used with permission. WILLIAM WEG MAN Roman Zenner 2002 PAINTINGS AND PHOTOGRAPHS When William Wegman began his career in the late 1960s, he like many young artists of his generation decided to abandon painting preferring instead to use pho­ tography and video to explore contemporary issues in art. Why abandon painting at this point? Painting, after all, had been under attack since the invention of photogra­ phy in the mid-nineteenth century. Still its output has continued for centuries virtu­ ally without interruption. Perhaps it was because painting in the 60s seemed less exciting or less flexible than the new media and unable to satisfy the needs of artists and the public in a technological post-modem society. Against the aesthetics of post­ modernism, painting as a medium affirms the values of originality and uniqueness. But these values had already been called into question decades earlier by Marcel Duchamp, Man Ray, and others. The decision to abandon painting overlooks certain facts about its resiliency. Painting has had a long history of success as an art form within a broad range of diverse cultures. As Richard Wollheim has argued," If artists over the centuries had not succeeded in putting across what they wished to convey, they would have turned to some other activity .... Or their public would have asked them to do SO."1 At the conclusion of a lengthy book on pain~ing, Wollheim's strongest argument for the continuation of painting is its survival as an art form.
    [Show full text]
  • RICHARD WOLLHEIM Copyright © British Academy 2001
    RICHARD WOLLHEIM Copyright © British Academy 2001 – all rights reserved Richard Arthur Wollheim 1923–2003 RICHARD ARTHUR WOLLHEIM was born on 5 May 1923 in London, the younger son of Eric Wollheim, of a German Jewish family, and Constance Baker, whose family came from the West Country and for centuries were peasants. His father was a theatrical impresario, who from 1918 acted as the Diaghilev ballet’s London manager. His mother was a Gaiety show- girl, who performed as an actress playing to the troops during the First World War, but at her husband’s insistence left the stage when she married. In his posthumously published memoir of his childhood, Germs (2004), which begins with his tottering out through the front door into the light at the age of two, Richard traces the roots in childhood of a variety of emotions he experienced in later life—resentment against calm, quiet places, the lure of danger, shame at the unreliability of his body, certain fears of inundation—and paints vivid pictures of his parents’ opinions, routines, behaviour and character. His father was emancipated and although he embraced no religious faith—indeed, considered all religion to be folly, he insisted that Richard was brought up as a Christian, an encumbrance Richard freed himself from when he grew up, from then on regarding all religions as harmful illusions, and, like Hume and Nietzsche, believing that religions tend to be worse the further they stray from polytheism. At the age of 13 he went to Westminster School as a King’s Scholar. It was the first time that he had been away to boarding-school, something he had been looking forward to but which turned out to be very different from what he had expected.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Concepts Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper Series
    Political Concepts Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper Series 54 December 2011 The Concept of Nature in Libertarianism Marcel Wissenburg Radboud University Nijmegen ([email protected]) C&M The Committee on Concepts and Methods www.concepts-methods.org IPSA International Political Science Association www.ipsa.org CIDE Research and Teaching in the Social Sciences www.cide.edu Editor The C&M working paper series are published by the Committee on Concepts and Methods Andreas Schedler (CIDE, Mexico City) (C&M), the Research Committee No. 1 of the International Political Science Association (IPSA), hosted at CIDE in Mexico City. C&M Editorial Board working papers are meant to share work in progress in a timely way before formal José Antonio Cheibub, University of Illinois at publication. Authors bear full responsibility for Urbana-Champaign the content of their contributions. All rights reserved. David Collier, University of California, Berkeley The Committee on Concepts and Methods Michael Coppedge, University of Notre Dame (C&M) promotes conceptual and methodological discussion in political science. It provides a forum of debate between John Gerring, Boston University methodological schools who otherwise tend to conduct their deliberations at separate tables. It Russell Hardin, New York University publishes two series of working papers: “Political Concepts” and “Political Methodology.” Evelyne Huber, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Political Concepts contains work of excellence on political concepts and political language. It James Johnson, University of Rochester seeks to include innovative contributions to concept analysis, language usage, concept operationalization, and measurement. Gary King, Harvard University Political Methodology contains work of Bernhard Kittel, University of Oldenburg excellence on methods and methodology in the study of politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Humour and the Young Child
    RESEARCH 4 19/2006/E Catherine Lyon Humour and the young child A review of the research literature What exactly is a sense of humour? Finally, does having a sense of hu- vision of a socially acceptable means On the basis of relevant research mour matter? Do children with a of expressing hostility and softening results on children and adults, ma- sense of humour have more friends, of an assertive/dominating style of ny favourable aspects of humour do better in school, or enjoy better interaction (McGhee, 1988). He states are presented. We learn that hu- emotional and physical health or not? rather unequivocally, “It is concluded mour is a skill that can be trained, Is a sense of humour inborn or some- that development of heightened early and this is where the use of media thing we can encourage? If we can humor helps to optimize children’s in the development of children’s teach a sense of humour, how do we social development.” humour comes into play. do that? Humour is frequently used to dispel Unlike other psychological constructs anxiety; by secondary reinforcement, (e. g., intelligence or extraversion) humour becomes a learned motive to there is no standard conception of experience mastery in the face of 1. What the research tells us sense of humour upon which re- anxiety – the “whistling in the dark” searchers generally agree (Martin, phenomenon. In studies investigating about humour and its 1998). With the caveat that this field stress and a sense of humour, e. g. development is currently made up of multiple ap- Martin and Lefcourt (1983 – cit.
    [Show full text]
  • DOCTORAL THESIS Stories of Comedy and Tragedy in Therapy
    DOCTORAL THESIS Stories of comedy and tragedy in therapy psychological therapists' experiences of humour in sessions with clients diagnosed with a terminal illness Chauhan, Gauri Award date: 2016 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 03. Oct. 2021 STORIES OF COMEDY AND TRAGEDY IN THERAPY: PSYCHOLOGICAL THERAPISTS’ EXPERIENCES OF HUMOUR IN SESSIONS WITH CLIENTS DIAGNOSED WITH A TERMINAL ILLNESS by Gauri Chauhan BSc A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of PsychD Department of Psychology Roehampton University 2015 Abstract This research explores psychological therapists’ experiences of humour in sessions with clients diagnosed with a terminal illness. In considering the extensive research uncovered involving humour and death, comparatively
    [Show full text]
  • 01.01.13 Green Liberalism
    The Green liberalism project is part of a wider Green Alliance programme which looks at the relationship between the values and priorities of the UK’s three main political traditions – conservatism, liberalism and social democracy – and their support for the development of a greener economy. Green Alliance is non-partisan and supports a politically pluralist approach to greening the economy and restoring natural systems. Many political scientists consider the environment to be an issue similar to health and education where voters judge the likely competence of a party if it were in power, and where most voters want similar outcomes. In such issues parties tend to avoid taking sharply contrasting ‘pro’ or ‘anti’ positions.1 Nevertheless the way environmental outcomes are achieved, and even understood, will differ depending on how individual parties view the confluence of their values with environmental solutions. There is also a risk that as environmental policy beings to impinge on significant economic decisions, such as the transformation of transport and energy infrastructure, there will be less common ground between parties. The two-year Green Roots programme will work with advisory groups made up of independent experts and supporters of each political tradition, including parliamentarians, policy experts and academics, to explore how the UK’s main political traditions can address environmental risks and develop distinct responses which align with their values. Liberalism is founded on a supreme belief in the importance of the individual.2 This belief naturally extends to a commitment to individual freedom, supported by the argument that “human beings are rational, thinking creatures… capable of defining and pursuing their own best interests.”3 However, “liberals do not believe that a balanced and tolerant society will develop naturally out of the free actions of individuals..
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy of Perception As a Guide to Aesthetics
    OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – FIRSTPROOFS, Fri Jan 31 2014, NEWGEN 5 Philosophy of Perception as a Guide to Aesthetics Bence Nanay 5.1 The Provocative Claim The aim of this paper is to argue for a provocative claim: that many, maybe even most traditional problems in aesthetics are in fact about philosophy of perception and can, as a result, be fruitfully addressed with the help of the conceptual apparatus of the philosophy of perception. I will spend much of the paper clarifying and qualifying this claim, which after all the qualifications may not sound so provocative after all. I need to clarify the following aspects of this claim: (a) What is meant by aesthetics. (b) What is meant by philosophy of perception. (c) Why should we accept that it is a promising avenue of research to consider prob- lems in aesthetics to be really about the philosophy of perception. I will take these in turn. But before we begin, it needs to be emphasized that on the face of it, the claim I make does not sound crazy, at least if we consider the etymology of the term ‘aesthetics’. The Greek word ‘aesthemi’ means perception and when Alexander Baumgarten introduced the concept of ‘aesthetics’ in 1750, what he meant by it was precisely the philosophy of perception: the study of sense perception (scientia cogni- tionis sensitivae). My claim is that, regardless of etymology, this connection can also be made today. It is important that my aim is not to argue that aesthetics should be a subdiscipline of philosophy of perception or that any approach that does not consider aesthetics to be philosophy of perception is doomed or should be considered inferior.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Policy and National Interest: Realism and Its Critiques
    Foreign Policy and National Interest: Realism and Its Critiques Munafrizal Manan Universitas Al-Azhar Indonesia ABSTRACT Realism stated that conflict or even war among countries are acceptable in order to achieve national interest. Such a view has become the mainstream in international relations (IR) both theoretically and practically. But it does not mean that realist views are the best approach to discuss foreign policy and national interest. Liberalism and global humanism can be used as alternative approaches to discuss it. From the perspective of liberalism and global humanism, foreign policy is not only reflecting national interest, but also dealing with human and global interest. By focussing on the issues of economic globalization, democracy, human rights, and environment, the approaches of liberalism and global humanism show that these issues have now become a part of foreign policy and national interest of countries. It means that if it comes to human and global interests, then countries choose to cooperate globally rather than to involve in conflict or war. Keywords: Foreign Policy, National Interest, Realism, Liberalism, Humanism Global. Realisme memandang bahwa konflik dan bahkan perang dapat diterima dalam rangka mencapai kepentingan nasional. Pandangan seperti ini telah menjadi arus utama dalam hubungan internasional baik secara teoretis maupun praktis. Namun ini tidak berarti pandangan kaum realis adalah pendekatan terbaik untuk membahas kebijakan luar negeri dan kepentingan nasional. Liberalisme dan humanisme global dapat digunakan sebagai pendekatan alternatif untuk mendiskusikan hal tersebut. Dari perspektif liberalisme dan humanisme global, kebijakan luar negeri tidak hanya merefleksikan kepentingan nasional, tetapi juga berkaitan dengan kepentingan kemanusiaan dan global. Dengan fokus pada isu-isu globalisasi ekonomi, demokrasi, hak asasi manusia, dan lingkungan, pendekatan liberalisme dan humanisme global membuktikan bahwa isu-isu ini telah menjadi bagian dari kebijakan luar negeri dan kepentingan nasional negara- negara.
    [Show full text]
  • Localist Movements in a Global Economy: Sustainability
    Localist Movements in a Global Economy Sustainability, Justice, and Urban Development in the United States David J. Hess The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England © 2009 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or informa- tion storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher. For information on quantity discounts, email [email protected]. Set in Sabon by SNP Best-set Typesetter Ltd., Hong Kong. Printed and bound in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Hess, David J. Localist movements in a global economy : sustainability, justice, and urban development in the United States / David J. Hess. p. cm.—(Urban and industrial environments) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-262-01264-5 (hardcover : alk. paper)—ISBN 978-0-262-51232-9 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Sustainable urban development—United States. 2. Globalization. 3. Central-local government relations. I. Title. HC110.E5H47 2009 338.973′07091732—dc22 2008035958 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 Global Problems and Localist Solutions Can the global economy solve global problems, especially the paired sustainability and justice crises? In answering the question, political and civic leaders carve out a variety of positions based on opposing political ideologies that constitute a fi eld of debates over future policies. The mainstream debates involve various mixes of liberalism (which views relatively high levels of government intervention in the economy as neces- sary and desirable) and neoliberalism (which advocates less regulation, lower levels of government spending, and reliance on markets to solve social and environmental problems).
    [Show full text]