DOCSLIB.ORG

Flora Survey.PDF

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Flora Survey.PDF City of Bunbury Bunbury Youth Precinct Flora Survey Natural Area Holdings Pty Ltd 57 Boulder Road, Malaga, WA, 6090 Ph: (08) 9249 7634 [email protected] www.naturalarea.com.au City of Bunbury Bunbury Youth Precinct Flora Survey Disclaimer Natural Area Holdings Pty Ltd, trading as Natural Area Consulting Management Services (Natural Area), has prepared this report for the sole use of the Client and for the purposes as stated in the agreement between the Client and Natural Area under which this work was completed. This report may not be relied upon by any other party without the express written agreement of Natural Area. Natural Area has exercised due and customary care in the preparation of this document and has not, unless specifically stated, independently verified information provided by others. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made in relation to the contents of this report. Therefore, Natural Area assumes no liability for any loss resulting from errors, omission or misrepresentations made by others. This document has been made at the request of the Client. The use of this document by unauthorised third parties without written permission from Natural Area shall be at their own risk, and we accept no duty of care to any such third party. Any recommendations, opinions or findings stated in this report are based on circumstances and facts as they existed at the time Natural Area performed the work. Any changes in such circumstances and facts upon which this document is based may adversely affect any recommendations, opinions or findings contained in this document. No part of this document may be copied, duplicated or disclosed without the express written permission of the Client and Natural Area. Document BUN-R-Youth Precinct Flora Survey.docx Title Documents/Client Folders NAC V2/City of Bunbury/Bunbury Youth Precinct Flora Location Survey/Report/ Draft/Version Date Changes Prepared by Approved by Status No. Draft for client D1 June 2021 New document MG/KS BC comment Minor V1 July 2021 SH BC Released amendments Natural Area Holdings Pty Ltd © 2021 |Page 2 of 57 City of Bunbury Bunbury Youth Precinct Flora Survey Executive Summary Natural Area Consulting Management Services (Natural Area) was commissioned by the City of Bunbury to undertake a basic flora survey within a proposed clearing area along a section of Leschenault Inlet on the foreshore of Luciana Park in the City of Bunbury (Figure 1). The survey was undertaken to inform a clearing proposal for the area, to allow for the development of the Bunbury Youth Precinct (Playce, 2019). The flora survey confirmed: ▪ presence of a total of 22 species from 14 families, consisting of four native and 18 introduced (weed) species ▪ no threatened or priority species were identified ▪ no threatened or priority ecological communities were present within the survey area ▪ one vegetation type was recorded within the proposed clearing area, Mixed Open Coastal Heath, comprising of predominantly weed species mixed with sparse native sedges and shrubs ▪ vegetation condition across the entire site is Completely Degraded, with minimal native species present. An assessment of information obtained during the 2021 survey has been made against the Western Australian ten clearing principles. It is suggested that the clearing application is unlikely to be at variance with any of the ten clearing principles. It is recommended that landscaping occurs once construction works have ceased, using locally endemic species as well as the native species present during the survey (Ficinia nodosa, Acacia saligna, Frankenia pauciflora and Lepidosperma gladiatum). Natural Area Holdings Pty Ltd © 2021 |Page 3 of 57 City of Bunbury Bunbury Youth Precinct Flora Survey Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Location ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 1.2 Scope ............................................................................................................................................................ 5 2.0 Site Characteristics ........................................................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Regional Context .......................................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Climate ......................................................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Vegetation Complex ..................................................................................................................................... 8 2.4 Topography and Soils ................................................................................................................................... 8 3.0 Methodology .................................................................................................................................................... 9 3.1 Desktop and Literature Review .................................................................................................................... 9 3.2 On-ground Flora Survey ............................................................................................................................... 9 3.2.1 Vegetation ........................................................................................................................................... 9 3.3 Limitations .................................................................................................................................................11 4.0 Flora Survey Results .......................................................................................................................................12 4.1 Desktop Survey ..........................................................................................................................................12 4.1.1 Significant Flora .................................................................................................................................12 4.1.2 Threatened and Priority Ecological Communities .............................................................................13 4.2 Flora ...........................................................................................................................................................14 4.3 Vegetation Type and Condition .................................................................................................................16 4.4 Threatened and Priority Ecological Communities ......................................................................................17 5.0 Conclusion and Recommendation .................................................................................................................18 5.1 Flora and Vegetation ..................................................................................................................................18 5.2 Significant Flora ..........................................................................................................................................18 5.3 Threatened and Priority Ecological Communities ......................................................................................18 5.4 Assessment Against Clearing Principles .....................................................................................................18 5.5 Recommendation .......................................................................................................................................18 6.0 References ......................................................................................................................................................22 Appendix 1: NatureMap Report 5 km ....................................................................................................................24 Appendix 2: PMST Report 5km ..............................................................................................................................37 Appendix 3: Conservation Codes ...........................................................................................................................56 Natural Area Holdings Pty Ltd © 2021 |Page 4 of 57 City of Bunbury Bunbury Youth Precinct Flora Survey 1.0 Introduction Natural Area Consulting Management Services (Natural Area) was commissioned by the City of Bunbury to undertake a basic flora survey within a proposed clearing area along a section of Leschenault Inlet foreshore of Luciana Park, within the town centre of Bunbury (Figure 1). The survey was undertaken to provide information to inform a clearing proposal for the area to allow for the development of the Bunbury Youth Precinct (Playce, 2019). 1.1 Location The proposed clearing area is approximately 989 m2 of minimal foreshore vegetation within an Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) that is protected under the Environment Protection Act 1986 (EP Act) (WA) (Figure 2). Any clearing of native vegetation within an ESA requires a permit to clear from the Department of Water and Environmental
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Partial Flora Survey Rottnest Island Golf Course
    PARTIAL FLORA SURVEY ROTTNEST ISLAND GOLF COURSE Prepared by Marion Timms Commencing 1 st Fairway travelling to 2 nd – 11 th left hand side Family Botanical Name Common Name Mimosaceae Acacia rostellifera Summer scented wattle Dasypogonaceae Acanthocarpus preissii Prickle lily Apocynaceae Alyxia Buxifolia Dysentry bush Casuarinacea Casuarina obesa Swamp sheoak Cupressaceae Callitris preissii Rottnest Is. Pine Chenopodiaceae Halosarcia indica supsp. Bidens Chenopodiaceae Sarcocornia blackiana Samphire Chenopodiaceae Threlkeldia diffusa Coast bonefruit Chenopodiaceae Sarcocornia quinqueflora Beaded samphire Chenopodiaceae Suada australis Seablite Chenopodiaceae Atriplex isatidea Coast saltbush Poaceae Sporabolis virginicus Marine couch Myrtaceae Melaleuca lanceolata Rottnest Is. Teatree Pittosporaceae Pittosporum phylliraeoides Weeping pittosporum Poaceae Stipa flavescens Tussock grass 2nd – 11 th Fairway Family Botanical Name Common Name Chenopodiaceae Sarcocornia quinqueflora Beaded samphire Chenopodiaceae Atriplex isatidea Coast saltbush Cyperaceae Gahnia trifida Coast sword sedge Pittosporaceae Pittosporum phyliraeoides Weeping pittosporum Myrtaceae Melaleuca lanceolata Rottnest Is. Teatree Chenopodiaceae Sarcocornia blackiana Samphire Central drainage wetland commencing at Vietnam sign Family Botanical Name Common Name Chenopodiaceae Halosarcia halecnomoides Chenopodiaceae Sarcocornia quinqueflora Beaded samphire Chenopodiaceae Sarcocornia blackiana Samphire Poaceae Sporobolis virginicus Cyperaceae Gahnia Trifida Coast sword sedge
    [Show full text]
  • Restoration After Removal of Pines at Gnangara Final
    RESTORATION OF BANKSIA WOODLAND AFTER THE REMOVAL OF PINES AT GNANGARA: SEED SPECIES REQUIREMENTS AND PRESCRIPTIONS FOR RESTORATION A report prepared on behalf of the Department of Environment and Conservation for the Gnangara Sustainability Strategy Kellie Maher University of Western Australia May 2009 Restoration of Banksia woodland after the removal of pines at Gnangara: seed species requirements and prescriptions for restoration Report for the Department of Environment and Conservation Kellie Maher University of Western Australia Gnangara Sustainability Strategy Taskforce Department of Water 168 St Georges Terrace Perth Western Australia 6000 Telephone +61 8 6364 7600 Facsimile +61 8 6364 7601 www.gnangara.water.wa.gov.au © Government of Western Australia 2009 May 2009 This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 , all other rights are reserved. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Department of Conservation and Environment. This document has been commissioned/produced as part of the Gnangara Sustainability Strategy (GSS). The GSS is a State Government initiative which aims to provide a framework for a whole of government approach to address land use and water planning issues associated with the Gnangara groundwater system. For more information go to www.gnangara.water.wa.gov.au 1 Restoration of Banksia woodland after the removal of pines at Gnangara: seed species requirements and prescriptions for restoration A report to the Department of Environment and Conservation Kellie Maher University of Western Australia May 2009 2 Table of Contents List of Tables ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pests, Diseases, and Aridity Have Shaped the Genome of Corymbia Citriodora
    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Recent Work Title Pests, diseases, and aridity have shaped the genome of Corymbia citriodora. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5t51515k Journal Communications biology, 4(1) ISSN 2399-3642 Authors Healey, Adam L Shepherd, Mervyn King, Graham J et al. Publication Date 2021-05-10 DOI 10.1038/s42003-021-02009-0 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-02009-0 OPEN Pests, diseases, and aridity have shaped the genome of Corymbia citriodora ✉ Adam L. Healey 1,2 , Mervyn Shepherd 3, Graham J. King 3, Jakob B. Butler 4, Jules S. Freeman 4,5,6, David J. Lee 7, Brad M. Potts4,5, Orzenil B. Silva-Junior8, Abdul Baten 3,9, Jerry Jenkins 1, Shengqiang Shu 10, John T. Lovell 1, Avinash Sreedasyam1, Jane Grimwood 1, Agnelo Furtado2, Dario Grattapaglia8,11, Kerrie W. Barry10, Hope Hundley10, Blake A. Simmons 2,12, Jeremy Schmutz 1,10, René E. Vaillancourt4,5 & Robert J. Henry 2 Corymbia citriodora is a member of the predominantly Southern Hemisphere Myrtaceae family, which includes the eucalypts (Eucalyptus, Corymbia and Angophora; ~800 species). 1234567890():,; Corymbia is grown for timber, pulp and paper, and essential oils in Australia, South Africa, Asia, and Brazil, maintaining a high-growth rate under marginal conditions due to drought, poor-quality soil, and biotic stresses. To dissect the genetic basis of these desirable traits, we sequenced and assembled the 408 Mb genome of Corymbia citriodora, anchored into eleven chromosomes. Comparative analysis with Eucalyptus grandis reveals high synteny, although the two diverged approximately 60 million years ago and have different genome sizes (408 vs 641 Mb), with few large intra-chromosomal rearrangements.
    [Show full text]
  • Their Botany, Essential Oils and Uses 6.86 MB
    MELALEUCAS THEIR BOTANY, ESSENTIAL OILS AND USES Joseph J. Brophy, Lyndley A. Craven and John C. Doran MELALEUCAS THEIR BOTANY, ESSENTIAL OILS AND USES Joseph J. Brophy School of Chemistry, University of New South Wales Lyndley A. Craven Australian National Herbarium, CSIRO Plant Industry John C. Doran Australian Tree Seed Centre, CSIRO Plant Industry 2013 The Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) was established in June 1982 by an Act of the Australian Parliament. ACIAR operates as part of Australia's international development cooperation program, with a mission to achieve more productive and sustainable agricultural systems, for the benefit of developing countries and Australia. It commissions collaborative research between Australian and developing-country researchers in areas where Australia has special research competence. It also administers Australia's contribution to the International Agricultural Research Centres. Where trade names are used this constitutes neither endorsement of nor discrimination against any product by ACIAR. ACIAR MONOGRAPH SERIES This series contains the results of original research supported by ACIAR, or material deemed relevant to ACIAR’s research and development objectives. The series is distributed internationally, with an emphasis on developing countries. © Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) 2013 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from ACIAR, GPO Box 1571, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia, [email protected] Brophy J.J., Craven L.A. and Doran J.C. 2013. Melaleucas: their botany, essential oils and uses. ACIAR Monograph No. 156. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research: Canberra.
    [Show full text]
  • ALINTA DBNGP LOOPING 10 Rehabilitation Management Plan
    DBNGP (WA) Nominees Pty Ltd DBNGP LOOPING 10 Rehabilitation Management Plan ALINTA DBNGP LOOPING 10 Rehabilitation Management Plan November 2005 Ecos Consulting (Aust) Pty Ltd CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................ 1 2 REHABILITATION REVIEW............................................................ 1 2.1 REHABILITATION OBJECTIVES ............................................................... 2 3 EXISTING VEGETATION ................................................................. 2 3.1 FLORA AND VEGETATION...................................................................... 2 3.2 VEGETATION STUDIES ........................................................................... 4 3.2.1 Study Method ............................................................................... 4 3.2.2 Study Results ................................................................................ 7 3.3 OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES ...................................................... 10 4 REHABILITATION STRATEGY..................................................... 11 5 REHABILITATION METHODS ..................................................... 11 5.1 WEED MANAGEMENT.......................................................................... 11 5.2 DIEBACK (PHYTOPHTHORA CINNAMOMI) MANAGEMENT .................... 11 5.3 PRIORITY AND RARE FLORA MANAGEMENT ........................................ 12 5.4 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ................................................................... 13 5.5
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F- H (PDF, 4.64
    APPENDIX F Analysis to Investigate TEC SCP20a Presence Perth–Darwin National Highway (Swan Valley Section)– Supplementary Biological Studies 2015 Assessment of the Presence of the TEC SCP20a at Ioppolo Rd, Chittering COFFEY NOVEMBER 2015 TEL. (08) 9315 4688 [email protected] PO Box 50, Applecross WA 6953 www.woodmanenv.com.au Coffey Perth–Darwin National Highway (Swan Valley Section)– Supplementary Biological Studies 2015 Assessment of the presence of the TEC SCP20a at Ioppolo Rd, Chittering Perth–Darwin National Highway (Swan Valley Section) – Supplementary Biological Studies 2015: Assessment of the presence of the TEC SCP20a at Ioppolo Rd, Chittering Prepared for: Coffey Job Number: Coffey15‐28 Report Number: Coffey15‐28‐03 Cover Photograph: Lot M2019 ‐ Ioppolo Road, waypoint 82 (Woodman Environmental) DOCUMENT REVISION AND STATUS Revision Status Originator Internal Internal Client Client Reviewer Review Date Reviewer Review Date A Draft report BL CG/GW 22/10/2015 N. Raymond 16/11/2015 Main Roads B Client Comments BL GW 19/11/2015 D. Morley 26/11/2015 Incorporated Main Roads 0 Final report BL GW 26/11/2015 DISCLAIMER This document is prepared in accordance with and subject to an agreement between Woodman Environmental Consulting Pty Ltd (“Woodman Environmental”) and the client for whom it has been prepared (“Coffey”) and is restricted to those issues that have been raised by the Client in its engagement of Woodman Environmental and prepared eusing th standard of skill and care ordinarily exercised by Environmental Scientists
    [Show full text]
  • Sistemática Y Evolución De Encyclia Hook
    ·>- POSGRADO EN CIENCIAS ~ BIOLÓGICAS CICY ) Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, A.C. Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas SISTEMÁTICA Y EVOLUCIÓN DE ENCYCLIA HOOK. (ORCHIDACEAE: LAELIINAE), CON ÉNFASIS EN MEGAMÉXICO 111 Tesis que presenta CARLOS LUIS LEOPARDI VERDE En opción al título de DOCTOR EN CIENCIAS (Ciencias Biológicas: Opción Recursos Naturales) Mérida, Yucatán, México Abril 2014 ( 1 CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIÓN CIENTÍFICA DE YUCATÁN, A.C. POSGRADO EN CIENCIAS BIOLÓGICAS OSCJRA )0 f CENCIAS RECONOCIMIENTO S( JIOI ÚGIC A'- CICY Por medio de la presente, hago constar que el trabajo de tesis titulado "Sistemática y evo­ lución de Encyclia Hook. (Orchidaceae, Laeliinae), con énfasis en Megaméxico 111" fue realizado en los laboratorios de la Unidad de Recursos Naturales del Centro de Investiga­ ción Científica de Yucatán , A.C. bajo la dirección de los Drs. Germán Carnevali y Gustavo A. Romero, dentro de la opción Recursos Naturales, perteneciente al Programa de Pos­ grado en Ciencias Biológicas de este Centro. Atentamente, Coordinador de Docencia Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, A.C. Mérida, Yucatán, México; a 26 de marzo de 2014 DECLARACIÓN DE PROPIEDAD Declaro que la información contenida en la sección de Materiales y Métodos Experimentales, los Resultados y Discusión de este documento, proviene de las actividades de experimen­ tación realizadas durante el período que se me asignó para desarrollar mi trabajo de tesis, en las Unidades y Laboratorios del Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, A.C., y que a razón de lo anterior y en contraprestación de los servicios educativos o de apoyo que me fueron brindados, dicha información, en términos de la Ley Federal del Derecho de Autor y la Ley de la Propiedad Industrial, le pertenece patrimonialmente a dicho Centro de Investigación.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Summary: Port Phillip and Westernport, Victoria
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterloo Urban and Industrial Expansion Flora and Fauna Survey
    Shire of Dardanup Waterloo Urban and Industrial Expansion Flora and Fauna Survey March 2015 Executive summary This report is subject to, and must be read in conjunction with, the limitations set out in Section 1.4 and the assumptions and qualifications contained throughout the Report. The Greater Bunbury Strategy and Structure Plan identified a potential significant urban expansion area located to the east of the Eaton locality and an industrial expansion area in Waterloo, in the Shire of Dardanup. The Shire of Dardanup (the Shire) and the Department of Planning have commenced preparation of District Structure Plans (DSP) for the urban expansion area and the industrial expansion area. The DSP will be informed by several technical studies including flora and fauna surveys. The Shire has commissioned GHD Pty Ltd (GHD) to undertake a flora and fauna survey and reporting for the Project. The Project Area is situated in the locality of Waterloo in the Shire of Dardanup. The Project Area includes the urban development area to the north of the South- west Highway (SWH) and the industrial development area to the south of the SWH. GHD undertook a desktop assessment of the Project Area and a flora and fauna field assessment with the first phase conducted from 13 to 14 August, 2014 and the second phase conducted from 29 to 31 October 2014. The purpose of this assessment was to identify the parts of the Project Area that have high, moderate and low ecological values so that the Shire can develop the DSP in consideration of these ecological values. This assessment identified the biological features of the Project Area and the key results are as follows.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Orchidaceae: Genera and Species (12/1/2004)
    AUSTRALIAN ORCHID NAME INDEX (21/1/2008) by Mark A. Clements Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research/Australian National Herbarium GPO Box 1600 Canberra ACT 2601 Australia Corresponding author: [email protected] INTRODUCTION The Australian Orchid Name Index (AONI) provides the currently accepted scientific names, together with their synonyms, of all Australian orchids including those in external territories. The appropriate scientific name for each orchid taxon is based on data published in the scientific or historical literature, and/or from study of the relevant type specimens or illustrations and study of taxa as herbarium specimens, in the field or in the living state. Structure of the index: Genera and species are listed alphabetically. Accepted names for taxa are in bold, followed by the author(s), place and date of publication, details of the type(s), including where it is held and assessment of its status. The institution(s) where type specimen(s) are housed are recorded using the international codes for Herbaria (Appendix 1) as listed in Holmgren et al’s Index Herbariorum (1981) continuously updated, see [http://sciweb.nybg.org/science2/IndexHerbariorum.asp]. Citation of authors follows Brummit & Powell (1992) Authors of Plant Names; for book abbreviations, the standard is Taxonomic Literature, 2nd edn. (Stafleu & Cowan 1976-88; supplements, 1992-2000); and periodicals are abbreviated according to B-P- H/S (Bridson, 1992) [http://www.ipni.org/index.html]. Synonyms are provided with relevant information on place of publication and details of the type(s). They are indented and listed in chronological order under the accepted taxon name. Synonyms are also cross-referenced under genus.
    [Show full text]
  • Tese 2014 Cristiane Gouvêa Fajardo
    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO NORTE CENTRO DE BIOCIÊNCIAS PROGRAMA DE PÓS- GRADUAÇÃO EM ECOLOGIA Conservação genética de Cattleya granulosa Lindley: uma orquídea ameaçada de extinção Tese de Doutorado Cristiane Gouvêa Fajardo Orientador: Dr. Wagner Franco Molina Co-orientador: Dr. Fábio de Almeida Vieira Natal-RN 2014 1 CRISTIANE GOUVÊA FAJARDO Conservação genética da orquídea Cattleya granulosa Lindley Tese de Doutorado apresentada como requisito para a obtenção do título de Doutor, pelo Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Área de Ecologia Terrestre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte. Natal-RN 2014 1 “O mundo é um lugar perigoso de se viver, não por causa daqueles que fazem o mal, mas sim por causa daqueles que observam e deixam o mal acontecer.” Albert Einstein 2 SUMÁRIO Apresentação ..................................................................................................................... 1 Resumo .............................................................................................................................. 2 Abstract .............................................................................................................................. 3 Introdução .......................................................................................................................... 4 Objetivos ............................................................................................................................ 8 Referências .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Landcorp Denmark East Development Precinct Flora and Fauna Survey
    LandCorp Denmark East Development Precinct Flora and Fauna Survey October 2016 Executive summary Introduction Through the Royalties for Regions “Growing our South” initiative, the Shire of Denmark has received funding to provide a second crossing of the Denmark River, to upgrade approximately 6.5 km of local roads and to support the delivery of an industrial estate adjacent to McIntosh Road. GHD Pty Ltd (GHD) was commissioned by LandCorp to undertake a biological assessment of the project survey area. The purpose of the assessment was to identify and describe flora, vegetation and fauna within the survey area. The outcomes of the assessment will be used in the environmental assessment and approvals process and will identify the possible need for, and scope of, further field investigations will inform environmental impact assessment of the road upgrades. The survey area is approximately 68.5 ha in area and includes a broad area of land between Scotsdale Road and the Denmark River and the road reserve and adjacent land along East River Road and McIntosh Road between the Denmark Mt Barker Road and South Western Highway. A 200 m section north and south along the Denmark Mt Barker Road from East River Road was also surveyed. The biological assessment involved a desktop review and three separate field surveys, including a winter flora and fauna survey, spring flora and fauna survey and spring nocturnal fauna survey. Fauna surveys also included the use of movement sensitive cameras in key locations. Key biological aspects The key biological aspects and constraints identified for the survey area are summarised in the following table.
    [Show full text]