DOCSLIB.ORG

Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2009 Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2009 Annual Report Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2009 Annual Report WLRS Western Labrador Rail Services Canada Region Port Operations Switching Québec, QC QGRY Chemins de fer Trois-Rivières, QC Québec-Gatineau SLQ Chemin de fer St-Laurent HCRY Huron Central Railway Oregon Region & Atlantique (Québec) PNWR Portland & Western Railroad TR SLR St. Lawrence & Atlantic Railroad RSR New York/Ohio/ Contract Coal Illinois Region MVRY Pennsylvania Loading IMRR Illinois & Midland Railroad WTRM Region AOR Aliquippa & Ohio River Railroad TR Tomahawk Railway YB BPRR Rocky Mountain BPRR Buffalo & Pittsburgh Railroad TZPR Tazewell & Peoria Railroad OHCR YARR YRC CUOH Columbus & Ohio River Rail Road Region CUOH MMID TZPR MVRY Mahoning Valley Railway UTAH Utah Railway AOR POHC OSRR OHCR Ohio Central Railroad IMRR Portsmouth, VA OSRR Ohio Southern Railroad CWRY POHC Pittsburgh & Ohio Central Railroad RSR Rochester & Southern Railroad Southern Region WKRL ALM Arkansas Louisiana & Mississippi Railroad WTRM Warren & Trumbull Railroad ETRY ATW YARR Youngstown & Austintown Railroad AN AN Railway KWT BAYL The Bay Line Railroad YB Youngstown Belt Railroad CAGY Columbus & Greenville Railway LRWN CCKY Wilmington, NC CCKY Chattooga & Chickamauga Railway LXVR CHAT Chattahoochee Bay Railroad CAGY Rail Link Region CIRR Chattahoochee Industrial Railroad FP GC ATW Atlantic & Western Railway MNBR GSWR Savannah, GA FP Fordyce & Princeton Railroad RSOR CWRY Commonwealth Railway ALM CHAT GSWR Georgia Southwestern Railroad CIRR Brunswick, GA ETRY East Tennessee Railway BAYL Fernandina, FL FCRD First Coast Railroad KWT Kentucky West Tennessee Railway VR FCRD LDRR Louisiana & Delta Railroad LDRR AN GC G eor g ia Central Railway LRWN Little Rock & Western Railway Jacksonville, FL MMID Maryland Midland Railway St. Joe, FL LXVR Luxapalila Valley Railroad Panama City, FL RSOR Riceboro Southern Railway MNBR Meridian & Bigbee Railroad Baton Rouge, LA YRC York Railway Galveston, TX VR Valdosta Railway Port Operations WKRL Western Kentucky Railway Corpus Christi, TX Short Line Railroads Industrial Switching Port Operations Dashed lines indicate trackage rights Netherlands Region Darwin Port Operations Shunting Contracts UNITED KINGDOM Rotterdam Barneveld Ede GERMANY Rhine River Antwerp Alice BELGIUM Springs FRANCE Australia Region Genesee & Wyoming Australia (GWA) GWA-Operated Track FreightLink Interstate Lines with Open Access Brisbane Tarcoola Whyalla Perth Sydney Port Lincoln Adelaide Genesee & Wyoming Inc. (GWI) owns and operates short line and regional freight railroads in the United States, Canada, Australia and the Netherlands. Operations currently include 62 railroads Melbourne organized in nine regions, with approximately 6,000 miles of owned and leased track and approximately 3,400 additional miles under track access arrangements. GWI provides rail service at 16 ports in North America and Europe and performs contract coal loading and railcar switching for industrial customers. Financial Highlights (In thousands, except per share amounts) Years Ended December 31 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Income Statement Data Operating revenues $544,866 $601,984 $516,167 $450,683 $350,401 Income from operations 99,322 115,931 96,828 81,657 69,441 Income from continuing operations, net of tax 60,075 72,975 69,247 172,647 50,511 Net income 61,473 72,474 55,175 134,003 50,135 Net income attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 61,327 72,231 55,175 134,003 50,135 Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. common stockholders: Diluted earnings per common share from continuing operations 1.54 2.00 1.77 4.07 1.21 Diluted earnings/(loss) per common share from discontinued operations 0.04 (0.01) (0.36) (0.91) (0.01) Weighted average shares - Diluted 38,974 36,348 39,148 42,417 41,712 Balance Sheet Data as of Period End Total assets $1,697,032 $1,587,281 $1,077,801 $1,141,064 $980,598 Long-term debt (excluding portion due within one year) and capital leases 421,616 535,231 270,519 241,313 333,625 Equity 688,877 479,414 430,981 520,187 397,820 Operating Revenues Operating Income Net Income from Diluted Earnings Per Share ($ In Millions) ($ In Millions) Continuing Operations from Continuing Operations ($ In Millions) $602.0 $115.9 $600 $172.6* $544.9 $4.07* $100 $99.3 $516.2 $96.8 500 $450.7 $81.7 $2.00 400 75 75 $73.0 $2.00 $69.4 $69.2 $350.4 $1.77 $60.1 $1.54 300 1.50 $50.5 50 50 $1.21 200 1.00 25 25 100 0.50 0 0 0 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 * Net Income and Diluted Earnings Per Share for 2006 include a gain on the sale of certain Australian assets. From the Chairman To Our Shareholders: In the crucible of 2009’s economic turmoil, I am enormously pleased with the performance of Genesee & Wyoming’s leadership team and all GWI personnel. Last year in my letter to you, I wrote: “We face the current economic turmoil from a position of relative strength: ■ We manage the business for the long term with a simple, straightforward business model. The basic tenets are: _ Maximize the free cash flow of core businesses. Mortimer B. Fuller III _ Reduce expenses when revenues soften. Chairman _ Make acquisitions with discipline. ■ We have a broad revenue base highly diversified by customer, commodity and geography and augmented by our acquisitions in 2008. Approximately 60% of that base is not highly economically sensitive. ■ We have a strong, seasoned management team and dedicated employees.” So it is with satisfaction that I reflect on the following measures of our actual performance in 2009: ■ $127 million of cash flow from operating activities and $75 million of free cash flow,1 ■ a stronger balance sheet today than last year, ■ effective expense management reflected by an operating ratio virtually the same as last year’s, ■ the downside cushioned by a diversified revenue base, and ■ 0.74 injuries per 200,000 man hours worked. These are impressive results in the context of the 2009 economy. Genesee & Wyoming’s Core Purpose is to be the safest and most respected rail service provider in the world. In safety, our quest is for zero injuries. Note that 0.74 is a lower frequency rate than has been achieved by any current Class I railroad. That accomplishment is a testament to the focus and morale of our personnel. In 2007, after 30 years as Chief Executive Officer of Genesee & Wyoming Inc., the Board and I passed the mantle of leadership to Jack Hellmann and a management team relatively new in their positions. Carefully chosen, that team had already demonstrated their ability to manage growth, and, in 2009, they successfully dealt with the major challenges of this severe recession. As I transition in 2010 from Executive Chairman to Chairman, my interest in GWI continues as a major shareholder. I am excited about our future, and I look forward to assisting with the continuing transformation of the Company toward its Core Purpose. My thanks to our Board of Directors, our customers, shareholders and, particularly, to my coworkers for the constancy of your help and support over the last 32 years. Mortimer B. Fuller III Chairman 1 Free cash flow is a non-GAAP financial measure and is not intended to replace net cash provided by operating activities, its most directly comparable GAAP measure. The infor- mation required by Regulation G under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including a reconciliation to net cash provided by operating activities, is included on page 12. 2009 Annual Report 3 From the CEO John C. Hellmann President and Chief Executive Officer To Our Shareholders: The past year has been like no other. In 2009, North American rail shipments declined to the lowest level since the Association of American Railroads began issuing its traffic report in 1988. At GWI, we felt the sharpest impact of the recession in two distinct periods. First, our freight shipments declined approximately 12% over the course of the fourth quarter of 2008. Second, our shipments dropped an additional 12% in the second quarter of 2009. Our rail traffic then stabilized for the final six months of 2009, and we have seen some areas of modest improvement as we enter 2010. In this dismal economic environment, I am pleased to report that GWI generated $127 million of cash flow from operating activities and $75 million of free cash flow in 2009,1 the second highest in our history. We reduced our costs at the same rate as our revenues declined; we maintained our operating margins; and, with $106 million in cash and an undrawn $300 million credit facility, we are financially stronger today than when the recession began. These accomplishments were the direct result of the extraordinary dedica- tion and hard work of our management and employees. As we enter 2010, I would like to start by thanking our people for getting us through this difficult period by making GWI more efficient than we have ever been. Safety In 2009, we achieved the best safety performance in our history as 52 out of 62 GWI railroads were injury-free. Our injury-frequency rate per 200,000 man hours was 0.74, a 44% improvement over 2008. For context, GWI’s safety performance was nearly five times better than the short line peer group average and more than twice as good as the Class I railroad average. While we have now reached levels of safety performance that many thought unattainable for short line railroads due to the heavy switching nature of our work (i.e., frequently getting on and off equipment), we continue to strive to be an injury-free company. To extend our safety culture deeper into the communities where we operate, we significantly expanded our participation in Operation Lifesaver, a nonprofit education and awareness program dedicated to ending collisions, fatalities and injuries at highway- rail grade crossings and on railroad rights of way.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2.0 Current Freight Rail System and Services in Florida
    Investment Element of the 2010 Florida Rail System Plan 2.0 Current Freight Rail System and Services in Florida 2.1 Overview The Florida rail system is comprised of 2,786 miles of mainline track, which are owned by 15 operating line-haul railroads and terminal or switching companies, as well as 81 miles owned by the State of Florida. Florida’s rail system includes 2 Class I Railroads (CSX Transportation and Norfolk Southern Corporation), 1 Class II (Florida East Coast Railway), 11 Class III (Alabama and Gulf Coast Railway AN Railway, Bay Line Railroad, First Coast Railroad, Florida West Coast Railroad, Florida Central Railroad, Florida Midland Railroad, Florida Northern Railroad, Georgia and Florida Railway, Seminole Gulf Railway, and South Central Florida Express) and 1 railroad specializing in switching and terminals (Talleyrand Terminal).9 The largest operator in the State is CSX Transportation, which owns more than 53 percent of the statewide track mileage. In 2008, Florida’s railroads carried nearly 1.6 million carloads – 19 percent less than in 2006 – and approximately 83 million tons of freight, representing a 25 million ton (23 percent) decrease from 2006.10 During that year, railroads handled freight equivalent to roughly 5.0 million heavy trucks.11 Nonetheless, railroads continue to support thousands of jobs throughout the State and assist Florida’s industries to remain competitive with international and domestic markets for fertilizer, construction rock, consumer goods, paper products, processed 9 U.S. Class I Railroads are line-haul freight railroads with 2007 operating revenue in excess of $359.6 million (2006 operating revenues exceeding $346.7 million).
    [Show full text]
  • Interchange Winter 2014 CSX Transportation and America’S Short Lines: Connecting for Growth
    INTERCHANGE Winter 2014 CSX Transportation and America’s Short Lines: Connecting For Growth AWARDS AND RECOGNITION OPPORTUNITIES FOR GROWTH NEWS AND NOTES 2014 – A Year of Strong Growth At the end of May, CSX interline volumes caused congestion and network service 300 new locomotives on order, with with the short line industry were 2.5 challenges for almost all the Class I 200 being delivered throughout 2015. percent favorable to 2013, or 8,540 railroads. Working with our short line Strategic infrastructure projects aimed at carloads. At the end of October, volume partners, CSX strove to mitigate network reducing congestion and enabling future gains reached almost 24,000 carloads, service issues through focus on its growth are almost finished. or a 3.5 percent improvement. interchange service at short line interchanges. This effort will continue as part of our Our business outlook remains favorable, Strength in Agricultural Products, Chemicals, Total Service Integration – Carload Initiative with over 90 percent of the markets stable Minerals, Metals, and Paper and Forest (“TSI – Carload”). or improving for the foreseeable future. Products drove these results, with all of Crude oil, frac sand, LPG, metals, and these business units delivering greater than As we close 2014, we need our short line domestic coal should all continue to grow. four percent interline growth with our short partners to stay focused on interchange With ongoing commercial and operating line partners. Domestic utility coal has also service efficiency, and continue to focus from our short line partners, the end experienced a huge turnaround since earlier focus on turning equipment as quickly of 2014 and beginning of 2015 look very this year, and has helped produce an almost as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • UTU News. June2008
    Volume 4 0 June 2008 N u m b e r 6 www.utuia.org www.utu.org The Official Publication of the United Transportation Union News and Notes U.S. rail members ratify Accidents take members Three UTU members – Eli A. Locklear, James Wilson, and David C. Goolsby – have U T U national agre e m e n t been killed in separate incidents. By overwhelming margins within each craft, “ A d d i t i o n a l l y,” said Futhey, “the UTU was L o c k l e a r, 46, a CSX conductor and member of Local 1011 at Hamlet, N.C., was killed May members of the United Transportation Union the only union to gain continuation of a COLA, 26 when he was crushed by tons of coal while have ratified a new national rail agreement beginning in 2010, while a new agreement is unloading a train. He was part of a two-person covering wages, rules and being negotiated. The COLA put crew that was unloading a 97-car train at working conditions. some $7 more per day in members’ Progress Energ y ’s Weatherspoon Plant when he The ratified agreement is pockets while we were at the nego- either fell or was pulled down into the coal. retroactive to Jan. 1, 2005, tiating table this round. Wilson, 35, a UP conductor and member and remains in force through “ We also retained, undis- of Local 923 in Dalhart, Texas, was riding on Dec. 31, 2009. turbed, our locally negotiat- top of a train car that was being pushed in an Amarillo, Texas, yard when he fell and was “In the face of recurring ed crew-consist agreements, hit by the train.
    [Show full text]
  • Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2016 Annual Report
    Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2016 Annual Report Genesee & Wyoming Inc.*owns or leases 122 freight railroads worldwide that are organized into 10 operating regions with approximately 7,300 employees and 3,000 customers. * The terms “Genesee & Wyoming,” “G&W,” “the company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer collectively to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliated companies. Financial Highlights Years Ended December 31 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Statement of Operations Data Operating revenues $874,916 $1,568,643 $1,639,012 $2,000,401 $2,001,527 Operating income 190,322 380,188 421,571 384,261 289,612 Net income 52,433 271,296 261,006 225,037 141,096 Net income attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 48,058 269,157 260,755 225,037 141,137 Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. common stockholders: Diluted earnings per common share (EPS) $1.02 $4.79 $4.58 $3.89 $2.42 Weighted average shares - Diluted 51,316 56,679 56,972 57,848 58,256 Balance Sheet Data as of Period End Total assets $5,226,115 $5,319,821 $5,595,753 $6,703,082 $7,634,958 Total debt 1,858,135 1,624,712 1,615,449 2,281,751 2,359,453 Total equity 1,500,462 2,149,070 2,357,980 2,519,461 3,187,121 Operating Revenues Operating Income Net Income Diluted Earnings ($ In Millions) ($ In Millions) ($ In Millions) 421.61,2 Per Common Share 2 2,001.5 401.6 1 $2,000 2,000.4 $400 394.12 $275 271.3 $5.00 1 2 4.79 1 374.3 1 380.21 384.3 261.0 4.581 1,800 250 4.50 350 1,639.0 225.01 225 2 1 1,600 233.5 4.00 2 3.89 1,568.6 4.10 2 300 2 200 213.9 213.3 2 3.78 2 1,400 1 3.50 3.69 289.6 183.32 3.142 250 175 1,200 3.00 211.
    [Show full text]
  • CP's North American Rail
    2020_CP_NetworkMap_Large_Front_1.6_Final_LowRes.pdf 1 6/5/2020 8:24:47 AM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Lake CP Railway Mileage Between Cities Rail Industry Index Legend Athabasca AGR Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway ETR Essex Terminal Railway MNRR Minnesota Commercial Railway TCWR Twin Cities & Western Railroad CP Average scale y y y a AMTK Amtrak EXO EXO MRL Montana Rail Link Inc TPLC Toronto Port Lands Company t t y i i er e C on C r v APD Albany Port Railroad FEC Florida East Coast Railway NBR Northern & Bergen Railroad TPW Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway t oon y o ork éal t y t r 0 100 200 300 km r er Y a n t APM Montreal Port Authority FLR Fife Lake Railway NBSR New Brunswick Southern Railway TRR Torch River Rail CP trackage, haulage and commercial rights oit ago r k tland c ding on xico w r r r uébec innipeg Fort Nelson é APNC Appanoose County Community Railroad FMR Forty Mile Railroad NCR Nipissing Central Railway UP Union Pacic e ansas hi alga ancou egina as o dmon hunder B o o Q Det E F K M Minneapolis Mon Mont N Alba Buffalo C C P R Saint John S T T V W APR Alberta Prairie Railway Excursions GEXR Goderich-Exeter Railway NECR New England Central Railroad VAEX Vale Railway CP principal shortline connections Albany 689 2622 1092 792 2636 2702 1574 3518 1517 2965 234 147 3528 412 2150 691 2272 1373 552 3253 1792 BCR The British Columbia Railway Company GFR Grand Forks Railway NJT New Jersey Transit Rail Operations VIA Via Rail A BCRY Barrie-Collingwood Railway GJR Guelph Junction Railway NLR Northern Light Rail VTR
    [Show full text]
  • Railroad Datasheet Contacts
    Railroad Right of Way Contacts Contact information for Right-of-Way Inquiries/Questions submitted by: RAILROAD: APPANOOSE COUNTY COMMUNITY RAILROAD _________________________ 2 RAILROAD: BURLINGTON JUNCTION RAILROAD ___________________________________ 2 RAILROAD: BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY __________________________________________ 2 RAILROAD: BOONE & SCENIC VALLEY RAILROAD __________________________________ 2 RAILROAD: CBEC RAILWAY, INC. _______________________________________________ 3 RAILROAD: CEDAR RAPIDS & IOWA CITY RAILWAY ________________________________ 3 RAILROAD: CHICAGO CENTRAL & PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY _____________________ 3 RAILROAD: CEDAR RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY ___________________________________ 4 RAILROAD: D & W RAILROAD (TRANSCO) ________________________________________ 4 RAILROAD: D & I RAILROAD ___________________________________________________ 4 RAILROAD: DAKOTA, MINNESOTA AND EASTERN RAILROAD ________________________ 4 RAILROAD: IOWA INTERSTATE RAILROAD COMPANY ______________________________ 5 RAILROAD: IOWA NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY ________________________________ 5 RAILROAD: IOWA RIVER RAILROAD ____________________________________________ 5 RAILROAD: IOWA TRACTION RAILROAD _________________________________________ 5 RAILROAD: NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY _____________________________ 5 RAILROAD: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY _________________________________ 6 Revised 1/22/2015 Railroad Right of Way Contacts RAILROAD: APPANOOSE COUNTY COMMUNITY RAILROAD RAILROAD CONTACT: Heather Clark TITLE: Manager ADDRESS: 128
    [Show full text]
  • Algoma Central Railway Passenger Rail Service
    Algoma Central Railway Passenger Rail Service ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT August 13, 2014 To: Algoma Central Railway (ACR) Passenger Service Working Group c/o Sault Ste. Marie Economic Development Corporation 99 Foster Drive – Level Three Sault Ste. Marie, ON P6A 5X6 From: BDO Canada LLP 747 Queen Street East Sault Ste. Marie, ON P6A 5N7 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................. I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................ 1 Introduction .............................................................................................. 1 Background ............................................................................................... 2 Purpose of the Report .................................................................................. 2 Revenue and Ridership ................................................................................ 2 Stakeholders ............................................................................................. 3 Socio-Economic Impact ................................................................................ 4 Economic Impact ........................................................................................... 4 Social Impact ............................................................................................... 5 Conclusion ................................................................................................ 6 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ARKANSAS-BOSTON MOUNTAINS CHAPTER NATIONAL RAILWAY HISTORICAL SOCIETY Chapter No
    ARKANSAS-BOSTON MOUNTAINS CHAPTER NATIONAL RAILWAY HISTORICAL SOCIETY Chapter No. 188 founded in 1987 2013 DIRECTORY OF OFFICERS President Bob Stark Vice President Al Kaeppel Secretary Malcolm Cleaveland Treasurer Tom Duggan Program Director open National Director Ken Eddy Board Director Larry Cain Editor Bill Merrifield Our website address is www.arkrailfan.com NRHS Chapter meets at 7:00 PM, February 20, 2014 at the Shiloh Museum Store. The Scrambler Volume 27, No. 6 February, 2014 Monthly Newsletter of the Arkansas-Boston Mountains Chapter, National Railway Historical Society CHAPTER MINUTES Meeting of the Arkansas-Boston Mtn. Chapter of the National Railway Historical Society at the Shiloh Muse- um, Springdale, AR. January 16, 2014. Meeting was called to order at 7:02 PM by the President, Bob Stark. 22 members were present, and no guests. Minutes of the November meeting were approved. Bob Stark presented the Chapter Annual Appreciation Award to Tom Duggan for his long and valuable service to the Chapter in several capacities, the latest as Treasurer and liaison with National for the 2014 Convention. The matter of officers for 2014 was taken up. Chuck Girard was tasked to put together a nominating commit- tee, but it was deemed unnecessary because the current officers were asked if they wished to continue serving and were re-elected by acclamation: Bob Stark, President; Al Kaeppel, V-P; Tom Duggan, Treasurer.; Mal- colm Cleaveland, Secretary; Ken Eddy, National NRHS Representative, Chuck Girard, local membership; Gary McCullah and Steve Tharp, National Directors. Tom Duggan, the Treasurer, reported our total assets as $13,190. He handed out slips for a refund of the $12 chapter dues as we discussed in November, although some members are passing up the refund so the chapter can keep the money (defeating the idea of refunding chapter dues as a way of partially reducing the rather large accumulation in our accounts).
    [Show full text]
  • The Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing (RRIF) Program
    The Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing (RRIF) Program David Randall Peterman Analyst in Transportation Policy January 31, 2018 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R44028 The Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing (RRIF) Program Summary Congress created the Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing (RRIF) program to offer long-term, low-cost loans to railroad operators, with particular attention to small freight railroads, to help them finance improvements to infrastructure and investments in equipment. The program is intended to operate at no cost to the government, and it does not receive an annual appropriation. Since 2000, the RRIF program has made 37 loans totaling $5.4 billion (valued at $5.9 billion in 2018 dollars). The program, which is administered by the Build America Bureau within the Office of the Secretary of Transportation, has approved only four loans since 2012. Congress has authorized $35 billion in loan authority for the RRIF program and repeatedly has urged the Department of Transportation (DOT) to increase the number of loans the program makes. Reports suggest the uncertain length and outcome of the RRIF loan application process and the up-front costs to prospective borrowers are among the elements of the program that have reduced its appeal compared with other financing options available to railroads. By statute, the Build America Bureau has 90 days from the time a completed application is submitted to render a decision on the application. This timeline becomes uncertain due to the Bureau’s discretion in determining when a loan application is “complete.” A 2014 audit indicated that some loan applications had been in process for more than a year.
    [Show full text]
  • Midville Mahrt
    Rochester Buffalo Silver Springs Erie Mt. Jewett PENNSYLVANIA Driftwood New Castle Peoria Homer City Pittsburg Havana ILLINOIS York Springfield ILLINOIS MISSOURI KENTUCKY Murray Elizabethton Paris Johnson City Dresden Henry ETRY Bruceton McKenzie Cumnock Sanford ARKANSAS ATW Chattanooga TENNESSEE NORTH CAROLINA Danville Chickamauga East Greenville Little Rock Hedges Rock CCKY CPDR HR Laurens T Berryton Hartsville RR Darlington GN SCRF Florence Bishopville Amory Fordyce Atlanta Fordyce ABR R FC WR GR Banks Greenwood West Point Belk RC GW Eupora LXVR Hermitage Fernbank Talladega Columbus SCS EARY Greenville Sylacauga Crosset Crossett Gantts Quarry SA N AGR LW SOUTH Midville CAROLINA Bastrop GEORGIA Macon NS GM R Operated by Pioneer Demopolis GC GM Selma Columbus R Nunez Meridian Montgomery Dublin Linden CCH GSWR Monroe MNBR Nuckols GMR ALABAMA Garden City GC SAPT Mahrt Helena Vidalia Savannah NS Americus Kimbrough Cordele White Preston CSX GeorgetownGITW Oak Genesee & Wyoming Railroads Troy Smithville Richmond Hill Hybart Eufaula HOG HOG Heart of Georgia Railroad COEH GSWR Dawson CSX Goshen BAYL The Bay Line Railroad, L.L.C. Cuthbert CCH Columbus & Chattahoochee Railroad, Inc. RSOR GC Georgia Central Railway, L.P. MISSISSIPPI Georgiana Riceboro Abbeville Albany GSWR Georgia Southwestern Railroad, Inc. HAL Hilton & Albany Railroad, Inc. LOUISIANA HAL GFRR Dashed line indicates Trackage Rights. Waterford BAYL Gray line indicates Out of Service. Arlington TNHR WGCR 07/2017 Andalusia Enterprise Grime s Hilton SMWR R CIRR FR Dothan G GFRR Saffold G F Atmore RR GITM Lynn Bainbridge Seals Cottondale CS Valdosta X Chattahoochee CS X Kingsland SM Mobile VR Clyattville Cantonment FCRD Fernandina Yulee GFRR Jacksonville Pensacola FLORIDA Lake Charles Lafayette TTR New Iberia AN FE Panama C City Port St.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Georgia State Rail Plan
    State Rail Plan Georgia State Rail Plan Final Report Master Contract #: TOOIP1900173 PI # 0015886 State Rail Plan Update – FY 2018 4/6/2021 State Rail Plan Contents 1. The Role of Rail in Statewide Transportation ......................................................................................... 1-7 1.1. Purpose and Content ...................................................................................................................... 1-7 1.2. Multimodal Transportation System Goals ...................................................................................... 1-8 1.3. Role of Rail in Georgia’s Transportation Network .......................................................................... 1-8 1.4. Role of Passenger Rail in Georgia Transportation Network ......................................................... 1-16 1.5. Institutional Governance Structure of Rail in Georgia ................................................................. 1-19 1.6. Role of Federal Agencies .............................................................................................................. 1-29 2. Georgia’s Existing Rail System ................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1. Description and Inventory .............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2. Trends and Forecasts ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Termination of Combat Zone Designation in Vietnam and Waters Adjacent Thereto Establishing an Emergency Board to Investigate
    Executive Orders EO 13003 Texarkana Union Station Trust Company Union Pacific Fruit Express Union Pacific Railroad Galveston, Houston and Henderson Railroad Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Oklahoma, Kansas & Texas Railroad Western Pacific Railroad Wichita Terminal Association Executive Order 13002 of May 13, 1996 Termination of Combat Zone Designation in Vietnam and Waters Adjacent Thereto By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 112(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 112(c)(3)), June 30, 1996, as of midnight thereof, is hereby designated as the date of termination of combatant activi- ties in the zone comprised of the area described in Executive Order No. 11216 of April 24, 1965. WILLIAM J. CLINTON THE WHITE HOUSE, May 13, 1996. Executive Order 13003 of May 15, 1996 Establishing an Emergency Board To Investigate Disputes Between Certain Railroads Represented by the National Carriers' Conference Committee of the National Railway Labor Conference and Their Employees Represented by the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Disputes exist between certain railroads represented by the National Car- riers' Conference Committee of the National Railway Labor Conference, in- cluding Consolidated Rail Corporation (including the Clearfield Cluster), Burlington Northern Railroad Co., CSX Transportation Inc., Norfolk South- ern Railway Co., Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co., Union Pacific Railroad, Chicago & North Western Railway Co., Kansas City Southern Rail- way Co., and their employees represented by the Brotherhood of Mainte- nance of Way Employes. The railroads involved in these disputes are des- ignated on the attached list, which is made a part of this order.
    [Show full text]