Othmar Karas Building a Stronger Economic and Monetary MEP European Parliament Union to the Benefit of All European Citizens

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Othmar Karas Building a Stronger Economic and Monetary MEP European Parliament Union to the Benefit of All European Citizens Othmar Karas Building a Stronger Economic and Monetary MEP European Parliament Union to the Benefit of all European Citizens A quarter of a century ago, the Treaty 7.8 percent of its GDP corresponding of Maastricht became effective and to EUR 22 billion, the positive effect of paved the way for our single currency. the euro for Austria was greater than The euro was born as an accounting for any other euro area country in that currency in 1999 and euro banknotes year3. Regrettably, the euro is not always and coins began to circulate in 2002. perceived as such a success, which is Today, the euro is, after the U.S. dollar, partly due to the turbulences caused by the second most important currency in the global financial and economic crisis the world and the common means of that started in the United States in payment for more than 340 million 2007 to 2008. Europeans in 19 Member States. Sixty This recent crisis has undeniably countries and territories, representing revealed several weaknesses in the sys- another 175 million people, have tem underpinning the euro. In response, pegged their own currencies directly the EU adopted more than 40 pieces of or indirectly to the euro. After Brexit, legislation to stabilize markets, restore an estimated 85 percent of the total trust and increase the resilience of the GDP of the EU will be generated by financial sector as a whole. These mea- the economies of euro area countries1. sures include more stringent capital and liquidity requirements for all of the The euro – a success story © Europäisches Parlament currently 6,500 banks in the EU, the Looking back, the euro is on many introduction of the banker’s bonus cap, levels a success story. It has brought the establishment of the European immense tangible benefits for people, supervisory authorities (ESAs) as well firms and the euro area countries. as the Single Supervisory Mechanism Firstly, price stability, which has ensured (SSM), the Single Resolution Mecha- that our living standards are no longer nism (SRB) and strengthened deposit at the mercy of the high inflation and insurance. As so often in the history of volatile exchange rates of the 1970s and European integration, the biggest steps 1980s. Secondly, the abolition of expen- forward were made under duress, at sive charges for citizens travelling from the height of or immediately after a one euro country to another or for crisis. Also due to the constraints of transferring and withdrawing money in time, emergency interim measures – another euro country than at home. such as the establishment of the euro Thirdly, cheaper credit for households rescue system, the European Stability and businesses and on average enor- Mechanism (ESM), or the agreement mous savings of time and money for on the fiscal compact – have been firms, given there are no more exchange- established only on an intergovernmental rate risks nor transaction costs for basis. To increase democratic account- cross-border operations2. McKinsey ability and control, they still have to be has calculated that in 2010 the euro fully incorporated into EU Community boosted the wealth in the euro area Law. As long ago as in 1950, the French by no less than EUR 332 billion. With Foreign Minister Robert Schuman pointed 1 European Commission. 2017. 2 European Commission. 2017. 3 McKinsey. 2010. 45th ECONOMICS CONFERENCE 2018 163 Othmar Karas Othmar Karas it out well: “Europe will not be made all and Chancellor Merkel –, are in fact apart and fall back into the concept of the For example, we must complete the at once, or according to a single plan. It nothing new. They reflect imperatives, nation-state, with all of its consequences.” banking union as soon as possible. Ten will be built through concrete achievements which have been acknowledged for He went on: “The outcome of the Maas- risk-reducing measures for the EU which first create a de facto solidarity.” many decades to make up an effective tricht negotiations has established the path banking sector are close to being The adopted measures have con- economic and monetary policy. to European economic and monetary union, adopted. They include the reduction of tributed to making the euro stronger clearly and once and for all.”8 nonperforming loans, the revision of than before 2008. Today, unemploy- The far-back reaching roots Already at the time of birth of the the macroprudential framework, the ment in the EU has fallen to its lowest The underpinnings of the EMU can be Maastricht Treaty, Helmut Kohl was reduction of options and national dis- level in eight years and EU growth is set traced back at least 60 years when Ger- convinced that a common currency cretions in the application of capital and to remain robust with 2.1 percent in many, France, Italy, Belgium, Luxem- would inevitably lead to the introduc- liquidity requirements, the improve- 2018 and with 2 percent in 20194. With bourg and the Netherlands agreed to tion of a common budgetary, fiscal and ment of the bail-in instrument and the Greece successfully concluding the finan- implement joint economic policies in economic policy. The euro was never a introduction of a binding leverage ratio cial assistance programme on 20 August 1957. The European Economic Com- project for few, but always a project for and net stable funding ratio. There is, 2018, the last Member State has left the munity (EEC) came to life in that year all Member States. The euro is a political on the risk-sharing side, the urgent euro’s rescue fund5. Clearly, even the with the signing of the Rome Treaties. project, designed to pave the way for a necessity to complete the third pillar of most difficult tasks can be managed Just a little more than a decade later – political union. Except for Denmark the banking union with the establish- together in Europe, if only the political when Member States found themselves and the United Kingdom, which have ment of a common European Deposit will to do so is present. facing ever more frequent monetary an opt-out clause, all EU Member Insurance Scheme (EDIS) as well as the However, our Economic and Mone- turbulences – they instructed the Luxem- States have committed themselves to stronger application of the principle of tary Union (EMU) is not yet completed. bourgian Prime Minister Pierre Werner introduce the euro once they have met proportionality with the reduction of We must continue to draw the right to draw up a three-stage plan to estab- the convergence criteria. All EU citizens unnecessary bureaucracy and regulatory lessons from the crisis and address the lish an Economic and Monetary Union. – irrespective from which Member burdens for small and non-complex structural and institutional weaknesses In his 1970 report, Werner states that: State they come from, and irrespective institutions. that remain. In fact, there should be no “the economic and monetary union thus of whether that Member State is in the In addition, there are over 30 initia- complacency about the necessity to appears as a leaven for the development of euro area or not – are affected when it tives of the capital markets union (CMU) strengthen the euro’s architecture to political union, which in the long run it comes to the further development of to strengthen capital markets and in- ensure financial stability, growth and cannot do without”. He argued further our EMU. vestment in the EU. At this stage, over jobs in Austria and Europe. As Vice- that: “the economic and monetary union is two thirds of them have been imple- President Dombrovskis and Commis- an objective realizable in the course of the A complete EMU is a necessary mented. Although we want to create a sioner Moscovici jointly stated, “the present decade, provided the political will development step for our Union CMU, this does not mean we have a euro area does not need only firefighters – of the member states to realize this objec- The euro is much more than just a cur- capital market in Europe. With approx- it also needs builders and long-term tive (...) is present”7. rency. A complete EMU is not an end imately 70 percent, the biggest part of architects”6. The challenges of globalisa- As we know, it took more than two in itself, but a vital step in the develop- our real economy is bank-financed and tion, digitalisation and Brexit are exac- decades until the aforementioned Treaty ment process of our Union. The Five the CMU must therefore be a financing erbated by the daunting fact that the of Maastricht became effective and laid Presidents’ Report9, published in June union for our real economy. Measures euro is still the only currency in the the legal foundation for our common 2015, and the recent Reflection Paper include, for example, the European world which is not yet backed by a com- currency in 1993. The day after the nego- by the European Commission10, have investment engine EFSI (European mon budget, fiscal, economic and tax tiations on this Treaty were concluded, laid out the timetable for deepening the Fund for Strategic Investment) – which policy. Yet the ideas for the further the then German Chancellor, Helmut EMU until 2025. The large majority of to date has mobilised EUR 335 billion development of the EMU that are cur- Kohl, said: “The way to European unity is all the measures necessary to complete of investment in the EU (EUR 3.9 billion rently being discussed – including the irreversible. The member states of the Euro- the picture are either lying on the table in Austria), supported 750.000 jobs proposals and ideas put forward by pean Community are now bound in such a as legislative proposals by the European and 700.000 small and medium-sized President Juncker, President Macron way that it is impossible for them to split Commission or are already well advanced companies and will continue as part of in the EU legislative process.
Recommended publications
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Mep.At @Eppgroup 1047 Brüssel @Kostereu @Wtucekeu
    Ihre Ansprechpartner der ÖVP und EVP im EU-Parlament Ausschüsse Ausschüsse Ausschüsse Ausschüsse Ausschüsse Ausschüsse Wirtschaft und Währung Industrie, Forschung und Energie Verkehr und Fremdenverkehr Beschäftigung und Soziales Umwelt, Gesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit Landwirtschaft und ländliche Entwicklung Auswärtige Angelegenheiten EU-Budget Regionale Entwicklung Justiz und Inneres Petitionen Umwelt, Gesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit Sicherheit und Verteidigung Internationaler Handel Haushaltskontrolle Terrorismusbekämpfung Fischerei Wirtschaft und Währung Binnenmarkt und Konsumentenschutz Entwicklungspolitik Landwirtschaft und ländliche Entwicklung Menschenrechte Recht Genehmigungsverfahren für Pestizide Steuern Wissenschaft Wissenschaft Kultur und Bildung Verfassungsfragen Frauenrechte und Gleichstellung Vizepräsident des Europäischen Parlaments a.D. Stv. Vorsitzender des Wissenschaftsausschusses (STOA) Mitglied der parlamentarischen KMU-Intergruppe Vizepräsident der parlamentarischen Interessensgruppe Vizepräsident der Versammlung der Regionen Europas Präsident der Europäischen Parlamentarischen Gesellschaft Vorsitzender der Russland-Delegation des Stv. Vorsitzender Korea-Delegation des Mitglied der parlamentarischen Intergruppe für Alternsfragen und Generationensolidarität Präsident der Österreichisch-Kosovarischen Vorsitzender der parlamentarischen Intergruppe Europäischen Parlaments Europäischen Parlaments Bürokratieabbau Vizepräsident der parlamentarischen Intergruppe Freundschaftsgesellschaft Wein, Spirituosen und
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Markets Union Update – October/November 85.2 KB
    Policy update CMU Policy Update October – November HIGHLIGHTS • European Commission publishes new CMU Communication to emphasise need for progress • European Commission publishes prospectus Delegated Regulation • European Parliament adopts its position on crowdfunding, prepares to decide on SME listings European Commission Commission publishes Work Programme for 2019, including CMU priorities 23 October The European Commission has published its Work Programme 2019. It sets out in detail the Commission s main legislative priorities for the next 12 months to come, and consists of new initiatives as well as prioritisation of initiatives that are currently on the table. As the current Commission enters its final year, the Programme focuses on delivery with only a limited number of actual new priorities. On CMU, the Commission announces its objective to conclude, notably, the files on PEPP, insolvency, ESAs reform, crowdfunding, and the SME listings proposals. The Commission s new CMU Communication, published later in November, provides even more detail on the CMU priorities (see article below). Commission publishes new CMU Communication to accelerate progress 28 November The European Commission has published a new CMU Communication accompanied by an Annex. They provide a comprehensive list of all CMU legislative proposals and their current state of play. The main message? Commission says that its job is done, having already launched most of the promised 30+ CMU actions. It argues that it is now up to the European Parliament and the Council to deliver, speed up their work and finalise the files. 1 The Communication is especially useful in demonstrating which CMU files the Commission sees as particularly problematic.
    [Show full text]
  • Othmar KARAS Biography Universities 1996
    EIFR- Matinale du 29 Février 2012 Avec Othmar KARAS : « CRD IV: The European parliament's answer to restore trust in finance & economy » Othmar KARAS Biography Universities 1996: University of Vienna, graduated Mag. phil. (Grund- und Integrativwissenschaftliche Fakultät) 1997: University St. Gallen, postgraduate MBL (European and International Business Law) since 2007: University of Vienna, instructor (Department of Political Studies) Occupation and political Functions (excerpt) 1979 – 1981: Political advisor of the Austrian People's Party (ÖVP) 1981 – 1995: Manager in the banking and insurance sector, Assistant Secretary-General of Bundesländer Versicherung 1983 – 1990: Member of the Austrian Parliament 1995 – 1999: Secretary General of the Austrian People's Party (ÖVP) and member of the national board of the ÖVP since 1999: Member of the European Parliament European Parliament 1999 – 2004: Member of the Presidency and Treasurer of the EPP-Group 2002 – 2004: EPP coordinator in the Committee for Economic and Monetary Affairs 2004 - 2011: Vice-President and Treasurer of the EPP-Group since 2004: President of the SME Intergroup 2006 - 2009: Head of the ÖVP delegation since 2006: Member of the ÖVP national board since 2010: EPP coordinator in the Special Committee on the Financial, Economic and Social Crisis since 2011: Head of the ÖVP delegation since 2012: Vice President of the European Parliament Committees : Committee for Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee for Security and Defence Delegation for relations with Canada Committee
    [Show full text]
  • En En Amendments 1
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs 2020/2075(INI) 23.4.2021 AMENDMENTS 1 - 466 Draft report Margarida Marques (PE689.500v01-00) The review of the macroeconomic legislative framework for a better impact on Europe’s real economy and improved transparency of decision-making and democratic accountability (2020/2075(INI)) AM\1229373EN.docx PE691.374v01-00 EN United in diversityEN AM_Com_NonLegReport PE691.374v01-00 2/224 AM\1229373EN.docx EN Amendment 1 Markus Ferber, Ralf Seekatz, Jessica Polfjärd, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Esther de Lange, Danuta Maria Hübner, Luděk Niedermayer Motion for a resolution Citation 2 Motion for a resolution Amendment — having regard to the Treaty on — having regard to Article 2 of the European Union, signed in Maastricht on Treaty on European Union, 7 February 1992, establishing in Article 2 that ‘The Community shall have as its task, by establishing a common market and an economic and monetary union and by implementing the common policies or activities referred to in Articles 3 and 3a, to promote throughout the Community a harmonious and balanced development of economic activities, sustainable and non-inflationary growth respecting the environment, a high degree of convergence of economic performance, a high level of employment and of social protection, the raising of the standard of living and quality of life, and economic and social cohesion and solidarity among Member States’, Or. en Amendment 2 Luděk Niedermayer Motion for a resolution Citation 2 Motion for a resolution
    [Show full text]
  • A Look at the New European Parliament Page 1 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMITTEE (INTA)
    THE NEW EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT KEY COMMITTEE COMPOSITION 31 JULY 2019 INTRODUCTION After several marathon sessions, the European Council agreed on the line-up for the EU “top jobs” on 2 July 2019. The deal, which notably saw German Defence Minister Ursula von der Leyen (CDU, EPP) surprisingly designated as the next European Commission (EC) President, meant that the European Parliament (EP) could proceed with the election of its own leadership on 3 July. The EPP and Renew Europe (formerly ALDE) groups, in line with the agreement, did not present candidates for the EP President. As such, the vote pitted the S&D’s David-Maria Sassoli (IT) against two former Spitzenkandidaten – Ska Keller (DE) of the Greens and Jan Zahradil (CZ) of the ACRE/ECR, alongside placeholder candidate Sira Rego (ES) of GUE. Sassoli was elected President for the first half of the 2019 – 2024 mandate, while the EPP (presumably EPP Spitzenkandidat Manfred Weber) would take the reins from January 2022. The vote was largely seen as a formality and a demonstration of the three largest Groups’ capacity to govern. However, Zahradil received almost 100 votes (more than the total votes of the ECR group), and Keller received almost twice as many votes as there are Greens/EFA MEPs. This forced a second round in which Sassoli was narrowly elected with just 11 more than the necessary simple majority. Close to 12% of MEPs did not cast a ballot. MEPs also elected 14 Vice-Presidents (VPs): Mairead McGuinness (EPP, IE), Pedro Silva Pereira (S&D, PT), Rainer Wieland (EPP, DE), Katarina Barley (S&D, DE), Othmar Karas (EPP, AT), Ewa Kopacz (EPP, PL), Klara Dobrev (S&D, HU), Dita Charanzová (RE, CZ), Nicola Beer (RE, DE), Lívia Járóka (EPP, HU) and Heidi Hautala (Greens/EFA, FI) were elected in the first ballot, while Marcel Kolaja (Greens/EFA, CZ), Dimitrios Papadimoulis (GUE/NGL, EL) and Fabio Massimo Castaldo (NI, IT) needed the second round.
    [Show full text]
  • En En Amendments
    European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety 2018/0178(COD) 17.12.2018 AMENDMENTS 386 - 662 Draft report Bas Eickhout, Sirpa Pietikäinen (PE630.512v01-00) Establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment Proposal for a regulation (COM(2018)0353 – C8-0207/2018 – 2018/0178(COD)) AM\1172567EN.docx PE632.154v01-00 EN United in diversity EN AM_Com_LegReport PE632.154v01-00 2/123 AM\1172567EN.docx EN Amendment 386 Elena Gentile Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – title Text proposed by the Commission Amendment Environmental objectives Environmental and social objectives Or. en Amendment 387 Marco Valli, Piernicola Pedicini, Laura Agea Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – title Text proposed by the Commission Amendment 5 Environmental objectives 5 Environmental and social objectives Or. en Amendment 388 Paul Tang, Pervenche Berès Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – title Text proposed by the Commission Amendment Environmental objectives Environmental and social objectives Or. en Amendment 389 Simona Bonafè, Luigi Morgano Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – title Text proposed by the Commission Amendment AM\1172567EN.docx 3/123 PE632.154v01-00 EN 5 Environmental objectives 5 Environmental and social objectives Or. en Amendment 390 Elena Gentile Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Text proposed by the Commission Amendment For the purposes of this Regulation, the For the purposes of this Regulation, the following shall be environmental following shall be environmental and objectives: social objectives: Or. en Amendment 391 Marco Valli, Piernicola Pedicini, Laura Agea Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Text proposed by the Commission Amendment For the purposes of this Regulation, the For the purposes of this Regulation, the following shall be environmental following shall be environmental and objectives: social objectives: Or.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda 18 January - 24 January 2021 20210111APR95303
    Agenda 18 January - 24 January 2021 20210111APR95303 The Week Ahead 18 – 24 January 2021 Plenary session Plenary session COVID-19 vaccines. In a debate on Tuesday, MEPs are likely to reiterate the need for more clarity and transparency regarding vaccine contracts, authorisation, availability and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines. They are also expected to ask for additional clarification on the present status of the EU vaccines strategy for COVID-19, launched by the Commission in June 2020. Biden inauguration/Situation in the US. On Wednesday, MEPs will debate the inauguration of Joe Biden as new US President taking place the same day, the future of EU-US relations, and the riots and storming of the United States Capitol by some of Mr Trump’s hard-line supporters in an attempt to overturn the results of the election and prevent the formalisation of President-elect Joe Biden’s victory. Portuguese Council Presidency. On Wednesday morning, MEPs will discuss with Prime Minister António Costa and Commission President Ursula von der Leyen the programme of the Portuguese Council Presidency, which is set to focus on addressing the social dimension of the COVID-19 pandemic, achieving an inclusive climate and digital transition and on giving new impetus to EU relations with Africa and Latin America. Right to disconnect. MEPs are set to call for an EU law granting workers the right to disconnect digitally from work without facing consequences from employers. They consider the right to disconnect a fundamental right that allows workers to refrain from engaging in work- related tasks and phone calls, emails and other electronic messages outside their working hours, including holidays and other forms of leave.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Österreichischen Abgeordneten Zum Europäischen Parlament
    Factsheet 3/19 Foto: Tim Reckmann / PIXELIO Die österreichischen Abgeordneten zum Europäischen Parlament 9. Legislaturperiode 2019-2024 Stand: September 2019 ÖVP – Fraktion der Europäischen Volkspartei (Christdemokraten) MEP Mag. Othmar KARAS Geboren am 24. Dezember 1957, Ybbs Homepage: www.othmar-karas.at Website Europäisches Parlament: www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/de/4246/OTHMAR_KARAS/home MitarbeiterInnen Brüssel: Mag.a Michaela KOFLER: [email protected] Oliver SCHUSTER, MSc: [email protected] Nikolaus SUTTER, BA, MA: [email protected] Mitglied: Stellvertreter: Vizepräsident des Europäischen Ausschuss Industrie, Forschung und Parlaments Energie Ausschuss Wirtschaft und Währung Ausschusses konstitutionelle Fragen Delegation für die Beziehungen zu den Delegation für die Beziehungen zu Vereinigten Staaten Palästina Delegation in der Paritätischen Parlamentarischen Versammlung AKP-EU Delegation in der Parlamentarischen Versammlung der Union für den Mittelmeerraum Kontakt Brüssel: Kontakt Straßburg: Parlement européen Parlement européen Bât. Altiero Spinelli Bât. Louise Weiss 10E259 T12023 60, rue Wiertz / Wiertzstraat 60 1, avenue du Président Robert Schuman B-1047 Bruxelles/Brussel CS 91024 F-67070 Strasbourg Cedex Tel.: +32/2/28 45627 Fax: +32/2/28 49627 Tel.: +33/3/88 1 75627 Email: [email protected] Fax: +33/3/88 1 79627 Kontakt Österreich: Haus der Europäischen Union Wipplingerstraße 35 A-1010 Wien Tel. +43/1/533 84 48 Fax +43/1/533 84 48-20 E-Mail: [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • LSE European Politics and Policy (EUROPP) Blog: Karas Vs Kurz
    LSE European Politics and Policy (EUROPP) Blog: Karas vs Kurz: Why Austria’s Chancellor faces some difficult choices ahead of the 2019 European Page 1 of 3 Parliament elections Karas vs Kurz: Why Austria’s Chancellor faces some difficult choices ahead of the 2019 European Parliament elections Othmar Karas, the leader of the Austrian People’s Party’s (ÖVP) delegation to the European Parliament, is widely viewed as one of the most influential Austrian MEPs. However, as Michael Burri explains, Karas is now posing some difficult questions for the ÖVP and its Chancellor Sebastian Kurz ahead of the next European Parliament elections in May 2019. The European Parliament (EP) recently passed a modest electoral reform package designed to address worries about another low turnout in the next EP elections in May 2019. But the bigger worry for many is that voters across Europe who rewarded anti-EU sentiment in national elections in 2017 will do the same again. A European Parliament tailored to the agenda of Eurosceptic members would make the EP a much different institution than it is today. But the latest tumult over the European Parliament elections in Austria, a country where national political sentiment turned against the EU in 2017, suggests some of the risks that such a shift can bring for ruling parties, and the situation is exposing fractures between national and European party leaders. Situated along this fracture line is Othmar Karas, the leader of the Austrian People’s Party’s (ÖVP) delegation to the European Parliament. First elected to the European Parliament in 1999, Karas has worked his way through various leadership positions, including a term as an EP Vice President (2012-2014).
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of European Solidarity”
    Results of the 3rd Round of European HomeParliaments by Pulse of Europe: “The future of European solidarity” Status: 04.01.2021 Dear participants, dear politicians, Thanks to the support of EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and 30 ded- icated EU politicians, Pulse of Europe succeeded during this round of Euro- pean HomeParliaments in imple- menting innovations for the partic- ipation of citizens in EU politics. Pulse of Europe provides the first pan-European, scalable grassroots project for the participation of Euro- peans in EU policy decisions. It works both offline in a private environment and now also online via our Video HomeParliaments. Our mission is to create a per- manent, bottom-up format for engaging with EU policymakers. For the first time, late 2020 people from Ger- many, Austria, Italy, Luxembourg, Poland, Belgium, the Netherlands, Sweden, Portugal, Spain, Bulgaria and France exchanged their expectations for the EU. In addition, numer- ous cross-border HomeParliaments con- tributed to a transnational European dialogue. About 700 Europeans participated in local HomeParliaments. Another 500 discussed the future of European solidarity via the new Video HomeParliaments. As in the first two rounds of the European HomeParliaments, the participants of the privately organized discussion rounds were enthusiastic about the constructive exchange, the mutual understanding and the insights gained from the structured Click on the picture to see the video discussions about the future of European solidarity. EC Ursula von der Leyen The Video HomeParliaments enabled a special in- novation, among other things: a location-inde- Manfred Weber EPP Othmar Karas EPP pendent matching of participants, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action
    Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CONTENTS With the European elections approaching, CAN The scores were based on the votes of all MEPs on Austria 2 Europe wanted to provide people with some these ten issues. For each vote, MEPs were either Belgium 3 background information on how Members of the given a point for voting positively (i.e. either ‘for’ Bulgaria 4 European Parliament (MEPs) and political parties or ‘against’, depending on if the text furthered or Cyprus 5 represented in the European Parliament – both hindered the development of climate and energy Czech Republic 6 national and Europe-wide – have supported or re- policies) or no points for any of the other voting Denmark 7 jected climate and energy policy development in behaviours (i.e. ‘against’, ‘abstain’, ‘absent’, ‘didn’t Estonia 8 the last five years. With this information in hand, vote’). Overall scores were assigned to each MEP Finland 9 European citizens now have the opportunity to act by averaging out their points. The same was done France 10 on their desire for increased climate action in the for the European Parliament’s political groups and Germany 12 upcoming election by voting for MEPs who sup- all national political parties represented at the Greece 14 ported stronger climate policies and are running European Parliament, based on the points of their Hungary 15 for re-election or by casting their votes for the respective MEPs. Finally, scores were grouped into Ireland 16 most supportive parties. CAN Europe’s European four bands that we named for ease of use: very Italy 17 Parliament scorecards provide a ranking of both good (75-100%), good (50-74%), bad (25-49%) Latvia 19 political parties and individual MEPs based on ten and very bad (0-24%).
    [Show full text]