DOCSLIB.ORG

Mountain Ranges of the World Africa Asia‐Pacific Europe Latin America and North America the Caribbean

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mountain Ranges of the World Africa Asia‐Pacific Europe Latin America and North America the Caribbean View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Mountain Forum Mountain Ranges of the World Africa Asia‐Pacific Europe Latin America and North America the Caribbean • Ahaggar Mountains • Alborz • Alps (Austria, France, • Maya Mountains, Belize • Alaska Range Germany, Italy, • Aïr Mountains • Altai Mountains Slovenia, and • Sierra Madre de • Alaska Ranges Switzerland) Chiapas, Mexico, • Al‐Qabail Mountains • Bynar Range Guatemala, Honduras • Aleutian Range, Alaska • Ankarana Plateau • Annamite Range • Apennines, Italy and El Salvador • Appalachian Mountains, (Laos, Vietnam) • Balkan Mountains, • Sierra Madre Oriental, eastern United States and • Aurès Mountains eastern Canada (see • Anti‐Hebanon Bulgaria and Serbia Mexico • Bambouk Mountains Appalachian Trail by • Arabian Mountains • Black Forest, Germany • Sierra Madre state) • Drakensberg Occidental, Mexico • Caraballo, Philippines • Black Mountains, • Arctic Cordillera, • Grand Atlas Wales, UK • Sierra Madre del Sur, northeastern Canada • Caucasus Mexico • Guinée Forestière • Brecon Beacons, Wales, • Kaumajet Mountains, • Main Mountain UK • Cordillera Isabelia, Labrador, Canada • Lebombo Mountains Range, Taiwan Nicaragua and Honduras • Cairngorms, Scotland, • Kiglapait Mountains, • Marrah Mountains' • Cherskiy Range UK • Cordillera Los Maribios, Labrador, Canada Nicaragua • Mount Stanley • Chinia Hills, • Cantabrian Mountains, • Basin and Range Province • Nuba Mountains Myanmar Spain • Sierra de Chinajá, (Nevada et al) Guatemala • Outeniqua Mountain • Cordillera Central, • Carpathian Mountains, • Black Hills, South Dakota Range Philippines Poland, Czech Republic, • Sierra de Chuacús, and Wyoming Slovakia, Ukraine, Guatemala • Roggeveld • Dzhugdzhur Romania • Boston Mountains, Mountains Mountains • Sierra de los Arkansas • Caucasus (Russia, Cuchumatanes, • Ruwenzori Range • Eastern Ghats, India Georgia and Azerbaijan) Guatemala • Brooks Range, northern Alaska • Serra De Chella • Elburiagan • Dentelles de • Sierra del Lacandón, Mountains Montmirail, France Guatemala and Mexico • Chisos Mountains, Big • Swartberg Bend National Park, Texas Mountains • Gydan Mountains • Dinaric Alps (Slovenia, • Sierra del Merendón, Croatia, Bosnia and Guatemala and • Columbia Mountains, • Tibesti Mountains • Himalaya (Nepal, British Columbia Bhutan, China, India, Herzegovina, Honduras • Usambara Montenegro, Serbia, Pakistan) • Cordillera Central (Costa • Davis Mountains, Texas mountains Republic of Macedonia • Fansipan, Vietnam and Albania Rica) • Guadalupe Mountains, New Mexico and Texas • Japanese Alps • Grampian mountains – • Cerros de Escazú, Costa Scotland, UK Rica • Gunflint Range, • Khibinsky Mountains Minnesota, United States • Harz, Germany • Cordillera de • Khingan Mountains Guanacaste, Costa Rica and Ontario, Canada • Jura mountains, • • Gogebic Range, Wisconsin Kirthar Mountains Switzerland • Cordillera de Talamanca, range (Pakistan) Costa Rica and Panama and Michigan, United • Karelides, Finland States • Knuckles Mountain (ancient) • Cordillera de Tilarán, Range (Sri Lanka) Costa Rica • Henry Mountains, Utah • Macgillycuddy's Reeks, • • Interior Plateau Koryak Mountains Ireland • Cordillera de los Andes (Venezuela, Colombia, • Kunlun Mountains • Kuskokwim Mountains, • Măcin Mountains, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, Alaska • Kurai Mountains Romania Chile, Argentina) • Ouachita Mountains, • Safed Koh • Ore Mountains • Baudó Mountains, Oklahoma and Arkansas (Afghanistan, (Erzgebirge), Germany Colombia Pakistan) and Czech Republic • Laurentian Mountains, • Serranía de Macuira, Quebec • Salt Range (Pakistan) • Pennines, England, UK Colombia • Little Rocky Mountains, • Sayan Mountains • Pindus Mountains, • Sierra Nevada de Santa Greece • Montana • Sierra Madre, • Marta,Colombia Philippines • Pirin, Bulgaria • Mackenzie Mountains, • Serrania de la Northwest Territories and • Sikhote Alin • Pyrenees, France and Macarena, Colombia Yukon Spain Mountains • Rhodope Mountains, • Serra dos Aimorés, • Metacomet Ridge • Stanovoi Range Bulgaria and Greece Brazil Mountains, Connecticut and Massachusetts • Sulaiman Mountains • Rila, Bulgaria • Borborema Plateau, (Pakistan, Iran) Brazil • Interior Mountains, • Rhön Mountains, northern British Columbia • Taurus Mountains Germany • Chapada, Brazil • Nulato Hills, Alaska • Toba Kakar Range • Scandinavian • Chapada do Araripe, (Afghanistan, Mountains, Brazil • Ogilvie Mountains, Yukon Pakistan) Norway,Sweden and Finland • Crystal Mountains • Ozark Mountains, • Tian Shan, China, (Brazil) Arkansas,Missouri,Oklaho Kazakhstan, and • Sierra Morena, Spain ma and Kansas Kyrgyzstan • Espinhaço Mountains, • Sistema Bético, Spain Brazil • Pacific Coast Ranges, • Titiwangsa Mexico to Alaska Mountains, Malay • Sistema Central, Spain • Chapada dos Guimarães, Brazil • Pelly Mountains, Yukon Peninsula • Sistema Ibérico, Spain • Ural Mountains • Chapada das • Rocky Mountains, • Sistema Penibético, Mangabeiras, Brazil western United States • Verkhoyansk Spain and Canada Mountains • Mantiqueira Mountains, • Snowdonia, Wales, UK Brazil • San Francisco Peaks, • Western Ghats, India Arizona • Svecofennides, Finland • Serra do Mar, Brazil • Yablonoi Mountains and Sweden (ancient) • Gila Mountains, Arizona • Serra Gaúcha, Brazil • Zagros Mountains • Sudetes (Czech • Selwyn Mountains, Yukon Republic, Germany, and • Serra dos Órgãos, Brazil • Zangezur Mountains Poland) • Seward Peninsula, Alaska (Syunik, Armenia) • Serra Geral, Brazil • Šumava (Bavarian • Sierra Madre Occidental, • Vindhya range Forest, Bohemian • Serra de Ibiapaba, Brazil Mexico Central India forest), Czech Republic • Serra do Tiracambu, and Germany • Sierra Madre Oriental, Brazil Mexico • Swabian Alb, Germany • Sierra Madre del Sur, • Tatras, Slovakia and Mexico Poland • Eje Volcánico Transversal, • Tyrol Mountains, Mexico Austria • Chichinautzin or Sierra del • Ural Mountains, Russia Ajusco, Mexico • Vogelsberg Mountains, • Superstition Mountains, Germany Arizona • Vosges mountains, • Sutter Buttes, California France • • Wicklow Mountains, Tuxtla Mountains, Mexico Ireland • Uwharrie Mountains, North Carolina • White Mountains (Arizona) • White Mountains (Alaska) • Belcher Mountains, Hudson Bay .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1/2 the Weather in Germany in Spring 2020 Exceptionally
    The weather in Germany in spring 2020 Exceptionally sunny, fairly warm and far too dry Offenbach, 29 May 2020 – As in the previous year, the spring of 2020 was fairly warm. For most of the time, the weather in Germany was dominated by warm air, with just a few short cold snaps. At first, spring 2020 continued the trend of warmer-than-average months, which had started in June 2019 and only ended this May, when the temperature anomaly became slightly negative. Frequent high pressure produced one of the sunniest spring seasons since records began; at the same time, precipitation remained significantly below average. This has been announced by the Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD) after an initial analysis of the observations from its approximately 2000 measuring stations. Mild March and warmer-than-average April followed by slightly too cool May The average temperature in the spring of 2020 was 9.2 degrees Celsius (°C), 1.5 °C above the average of the international standard reference period 1961–1990. Compared to the warmer 1981–2010 reference period, the deviation was 0.7 °C above normal. Spring began with a mild March, which, however, saw a drop in temperature around the 20th with maximum temperatures often not exceeding single-digit figures. April, too, was significantly too warm, even belonging to the seven warmest April months since measurements began in 1881. May was slightly too cool, despite some stations in the south registering up to seven summer days with temperatures over 25 °C. This spring’s nationwide maximum temperature of 29.4 °C was recorded in Lingen in the Emsland on 21 May.
    [Show full text]
  • ENERGY COUNTRY REVIEW Sudan
    ENERGY COUNTRY REVIEW Sudan keyfactsenergy.com KEYFACTS Energy Country Review Sudan Most of Sudan's and South Sudan's proved reserves of oil and natural gas are located in the Muglad and Melut Basins, which extend into both countries. Natural gas associated with oil production is flared or reinjected into wells to improve oil output rates. Neither country currently produces or consumes dry natural gas. In Sudan, the Ministry of Finance and National Economy (MOFNE) regulates domestic refining operations and oil imports. The Sudanese Petroleum Corporation (SPC), an arm of the Ministry of Petroleum, is responsible for exploration, production, and distribution of crude oil and petroleum products in accordance with regulations set by the MOFNE. The SPC purchases crude oil at a subsidized cost from MOFNE and the China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC). The Sudan National Petroleum Corporation (Sudapet) is the national oil company in Sudan. History Sudan (the Republic of the Sudan) is bordered by Egypt (north), the Red Sea, Eritrea, and Ethiopia (east), South Sudan (south), the Central African Republic (southwest), Chad (west) and Libya (northwest). People lived in the Nile valley over 10,000 years ago. Rule by Egypt was replaced by the Nubian Kingdom of Kush in 1700 BC, persisting until 400 AD when Sudan became an outpost of the Byzantine empire. During the 16th century the Funj people, migrating from the south, dominated until 1821 when Egypt, under the Ottomans, Country Key Facts Official name: Republic of the Sudan Capital: Khartoum Population: 42,089,084 (2019) Area: 1.86 million square kilometers Form of government: Presidential Democratic Republic Language: Arabic, English Religion Sunni Muslim, small Christian minority Currency: Sudanese pound Calling code: +249 KEYFACTS Energy Country Review Sudan invaded.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Birimian Supergroup- and Tarkwaian Group-Hosted Gold Deposits of Ghana
    177 A review of the Birimian Supergroup- and Tarkwaian Group-hosted gold deposits of Ghana Albertus J. B. Smith1,2*, George Henry1,2 and Susan Frost-Killian3 1 DST-NRF Centre of Excellence for Integrated Mineral and Energy Resource Analysis, Department of Geology, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, 2006, South Africa. *Corresponding author e-mail address: [email protected] 2 Palaeoproterozoic Mineralisation Research Group, Department of Geology, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, 2006, South Africa 3 The MSA Group, 20B Rothesay Avenue, Craighall Park, 2196, South Africa DOI: 10.18814/epiiugs/2016/v39i2/95775 Ghana is the largest producer of gold in West Africa, veins. The vein- and sulphide-hosted gold is strongly a region with over 2,500 years of history with regards to associated with deformational fabrics formed by the gold production and trade. Modern exploration for and Eburnean extensional and compressional events, mining of gold in Ghana dates from 1874 with the respectively, suggesting that disseminated sulphide establishment of the British Gold Coast Colony, which mineralisation predates quartz vein-hosted was followed in 1957 by the independence of Ghana and mineralisation. The fluid from which the gold precipitated increased gold production since the early 1980s through is believed to have been of metamorphic origin and Ghana’s Economic Recovery Plan. At the time of writing, carbon dioxide (CO2) dominated, with lesser water (H2O) gold production (108.2 tonnes or 3.48 million ounces and nitrogen (N2) and minor methane (CH4). Gold [Moz] in 2014) accounted for approximately one-third precipitation was probably caused by decrease in of Ghana’s export revenues, with 36% of gold production pressure, temperature and CO2-H2O immiscibility, at coming from small-scale mining.
    [Show full text]
  • The Laccolith-Stock Controversy: New Results from the Southern Henry Mountains, Utah
    The laccolith-stock controversy: New results from the southern Henry Mountains, Utah MARIE D. JACKSON* Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218 DAVID D. POLLARD Departments of Applied Earth Sciences and Geology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305 ABSTRACT rule out the possibility of a stock at depth. At Mesa, Fig. 1). Gilbert inferred that the central Mount Hillers, paleomagnetic vectors indi- intrusions underlying the large domes are Domes of sedimentary strata at Mount cate that tongue-shaped sills and thin lacco- floored, mushroom-shaped laccoliths (Fig. 3). Holmes, Mount Ellsworth, and Mount Hillers liths overlying the central intrusion were More recently, C. B. Hunt (1953) inferred that in the southern Henry Mountains record suc- emplaced horizontally and were rotated dur- the central intrusions in the Henry Mountains cessive stages in the growth of shallow (3 to 4 ing doming through about 80° of dip. This are cylindrical stocks, surrounded by zones of km deep) magma chambers. Whether the in- sequence of events is not consistent with the shattered host rock. He postulated a process in trusions under these domes are laccoliths or emplacement of a stock and subsequent or which a narrow stock is injected vertically up- stocks has been the subject of controversy. contemporaneous lateral growth of sills and ward and then pushes aside and domes the sed- According to G. K. Gilbert, the central intru- minor laccoliths. Growth in diameter of a imentary strata as it grows in diameter. After the sions are direct analogues of much smaller, stock from about 300 m at Mount Holmes to stock is emplaced, tongue-shaped sills and lacco- floored intrusions, exposed on the flanks of nearly 3 km at Mount Hillers, as Hunt sug- liths are injected radially from the discordant the domes, that grew from sills by lifting and gested, should have been accompanied by sides of the stock (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Name 2 History
    Sudan This article is about the country. For the geographical two civil wars and the War in the Darfur region. Sudan region, see Sudan (region). suffers from poor human rights most particularly deal- “North Sudan” redirects here. For the Kingdom of North ing with the issues of ethnic cleansing and slavery in the Sudan, see Bir Tawil. nation.[18] For other uses, see Sudan (disambiguation). i as-Sūdān /suːˈdæn/ or 1 Name السودان :Sudan (Arabic /suːˈdɑːn/;[11]), officially the Republic of the Sudan[12] Jumhūrīyat as-Sūdān), is an Arab The country’s place name Sudan is a name given to a جمهورية السودان :Arabic) republic in the Nile Valley of North Africa, bordered by geographic region to the south of the Sahara, stretching Egypt to the north, the Red Sea, Eritrea and Ethiopia to from Western to eastern Central Africa. The name de- the east, South Sudan to the south, the Central African or “the ,(بلاد السودان) rives from the Arabic bilād as-sūdān Republic to the southwest, Chad to the west and Libya lands of the Blacks", an expression denoting West Africa to the northwest. It is the third largest country in Africa. and northern-Central Africa.[19] The Nile River divides the country into eastern and west- ern halves.[13] Its predominant religion is Islam.[14] Sudan was home to numerous ancient civilizations, such 2 History as the Kingdom of Kush, Kerma, Nobatia, Alodia, Makuria, Meroë and others, most of which flourished Main article: History of Sudan along the Nile River. During the predynastic period Nu- bia and Nagadan Upper Egypt were identical, simulta- neously evolved systems of pharaonic kingship by 3300 [15] BC.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Maps of the Eastern Alaska Range, Alaska, (44 Quadrangles, 1:63360 Scale)
    Report of Investigations 2015-6 GEOLOGIC MAPS OF THE EASTERN ALASKA RANGE, ALASKA, (44 quadrangles, 1:63,360 scale) descriptions and interpretations of map units by Warren J. Nokleberg, John N. Aleinikoff, Gerard C. Bond, Oscar J. Ferrians, Jr., Paige L. Herzon, Ian M. Lange, Ronny T. Miyaoka, Donald H. Richter, Carl E. Schwab, Steven R. Silva, Thomas E. Smith, and Richard E. Zehner Southeastern Tanana Basin Southern Yukon–Tanana Upland and Terrane Delta River Granite Jarvis Mountain Aurora Peak Creek Terrane Hines Creek Fault Black Rapids Glacier Jarvis Creek Glacier Subterrane - Southern Yukon–Tanana Terrane Windy Terrane Denali Denali Fault Fault East Susitna Canwell Batholith Glacier Maclaren Glacier McCallum Creek- Metamorhic Belt Meteor Peak Slate Creek Thrust Broxson Gulch Fault Thrust Rainbow Mountain Slana River Subterrane, Wrangellia Terrane Phelan Delta Creek River Highway Slana River Subterrane, Wrangellia Terrane Published by STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL & GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS 2015 GEOLOGIC MAPS OF THE EASTERN ALASKA RANGE, ALASKA, (44 quadrangles, 1:63,360 scale) descriptions and interpretations of map units Warren J. Nokleberg, John N. Aleinikoff, Gerard C. Bond, Oscar J. Ferrians, Jr., Paige L. Herzon, Ian M. Lange, Ronny T. Miyaoka, Donald H. Richter, Carl E. Schwab, Steven R. Silva, Thomas E. Smith, and Richard E. Zehner COVER: View toward the north across the eastern Alaska Range and into the southern Yukon–Tanana Upland highlighting geologic, structural, and geomorphic features. View is across the central Mount Hayes Quadrangle and is centered on the Delta River, Richardson Highway, and Trans-Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS). Major geologic features, from south to north, are: (1) the Slana River Subterrane, Wrangellia Terrane; (2) the Maclaren Terrane containing the Maclaren Glacier Metamorphic Belt to the south and the East Susitna Batholith to the north; (3) the Windy Terrane; (4) the Aurora Peak Terrane; and (5) the Jarvis Creek Glacier Subterrane of the Yukon–Tanana Terrane.
    [Show full text]
  • Population in the Slovak Carpathian Mountains
    Monitoring protocol for the Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) population in the Slovak Carpathian Mountains A1. Assessment and selection of sites and lynx for live-capture from the Carpathian source population in Slovakia D1. Monitoring the effects of lynx removal for translocations on the source populations Authors: Kubala J. Smolko P. Klinga P. Tám B. & Kropil R. September 2018 Report for the implementation of action A1 and D1 Realized in the frame of action A1: Assessment and selection of sites and lynx for live-capture from the Carpathian source population in Slovakia Authors: Kubala J. Smolko P. Klinga P. Tám B. & Kropil R. Content 1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………………….5 2. Objectives and attributes……………………………………………………………….7 3. Survey areas…………………………………………………………………………....7 4. Aims and principles of monitoring……………………………………………………11 5. What will be monitored?................................................................................................11 6. Monitoring network…………………………………………………………………...14 7. Passive monitoring: Collecting a chance (opportunistic information)………………..14 8. Active monitoring: Systematic surveys and monitoring system………………………15 8.1. Snow tracking………………………………………………………………………...15 8.2. Opportunistic and standardized collection of samples for genetic analysis…………..16 8.3. Camera trapping………………………………………………………………….......16 8.3.1. Opportunistic camera trapping……………………………………………………17 8.3.2. Deterministic camera trapping………………………………………………….....18 8.4. Captures and GPS/GSM telemetry…………………………………………………...20 9. Survey, monitoring and capture time-frame…………………………………………..22 References…………………………………………………………………………………….23 Foreword The purpose of this protocol is to provide detailed information about the objectives, attributes, sampling design and data management necessary for the implementation of the actions A1 and D1 within the LIFE LYNX - LIFE16 NAT/SI/000634 Together with the protocol on the A2 action in the Romanian Carpathians - Gazzola et al. (2018) it is required by the need to ensure a technical framework for the LIFE Lynx project team.
    [Show full text]
  • Indicators of Hemeroby for the Monitoring of Landscapes in Germany
    Indicators to monitor the structural diversity of landscapes Ulrich Walz Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development, Weberplatz 1, 01217 Dresden, Germany Ecological Modelling 295 (2015) 88–106, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.07.011 ABSTRACT An important level of biodiversity, alongside the diversity of genes and species, is the diversity of ecosystems and landscapes. In this contribution an indicator system is proposed to measure natural diversity (relief, soils, waters), cultural diversity (main land use classes, diversity of land use, ecotones, connectivity) and anthropogenic impacts (fragmentation, hemeroby, protection).The contribution gives an overview of various indicators on landscape diversity and heterogeneity currently used in Germany andEurope. Based on these indicators a complementary system, is presented. The indicators introduced here are derived from regular evaluations of the digital basis landscape model (BasicDLM) of the Authoritative Topographic-Cartographic Information System (ATKIS), the digital land cover model for Germany (LBM-DE) as well as other supplementary data such as the mapping of potential natural vegetation. With the proposed indicators it is possible to estimate cumulative land-use change and its impact on the environmental status and biodiversity, so that existing indicator systems are supplemented with meaningful additional information. Investigations have shown that indicators on forest fragmentation, hemeroby or ecotones can be derived from official geodata. As such geodata is regularly updated, trends in indicator values can be quickly identified. Large regional differences in the distribution of the proposed indicators have been confirmed, thereby revealing deficits and identifying those regions with a high potential for biodiversity. The indicators will be successively integrated into the web-based land-use monitor (http://www.ioer-monitor.de), which is freely available for public use.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Up
    Annual review 2016 The value we bring to media Measuring MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIR There are many positive testimonials to the work of the foundation over the years from the thousands of alumni who have benefited from our training. The most heartening compliment, repeated often, is that a Thomson Foundation course has been “a life-changing experience.” In an age, however, when funders want a more quantifiable impact, it is gratifying to have detailed external evidence of our achievements. Such is the case in Sudan (pages 10-13) where, over a four-year period, we helped to improve the quality of reporting of 700 journalists from print, radio and TV. An independent evaluation, led by a respected media development expert during 2016, showed that 98 per cent of participants felt the training had given them tangible benefits, including helping their career development. The evaluation also proved that a long-running training programme had helped to address systemic problems in a difficult regime, such as giving journalists the skills to minimise self-censorship and achieve international Measuring standards of reporting. Measuring the effectiveness of media development and journalism training courses has long been a contentious our impact issue. Sudan shows it is easier to do over the long term. As our digital training platform develops (pages 38-40), it will also be possible to measure the impact of a training in 2016 course in the short term. Our interactive programmes have been designed, and technology platform chosen, specifically so that real-time performance data for each user can be made easily available and progress measured.
    [Show full text]
  • CW3E AR Outlook for California DWR’S AR Program
    CW3E AR Outlook For California DWR’s AR Program Active weather pattern expected to bring heavy rainfall and snowfall to portions of the Western U.S. • A series of storms and landfalling ARs are forecast to bring significant precipitation to portions of Northern California and the Pacific Northwest over the next 7 days • AR 4/AR 5 conditions (based on the Ralph et al. 2019 AR Scale) are possible over coastal Oregon and Washington in association with the second landfalling AR • The highest 7-day precipitation amounts (5–10 inches) are forecast over the Pacific Coast Ranges and Cascade Mountains • More than 2 feet of snow is possible in the higher elevations of the Washington Cascades during the next 48 hours AR Outlook: 12 Nov 2020 Source: NWS Seattle, https://www.weather.gov/sew/ • Strong winds and heavy rainfall/mountain snowfall are expected Friday and Friday night across western Washington • At least 12” of snow are forecast over the Olympic Mountains and Washington Cascades during the next 48 hours • The highest elevations in the Cascades may receive 2–4 feet of snow by Saturday morning AR Outlook: 12 Nov 2020 For California DWR’s AR Program GFS IVT & SLP Forecasts A) Valid 1200 UTC 13 Nov (F-036) B) Valid 0000 UTC 15 Nov (F-72) C) Valid 0000 UTC 17 Nov (F-120) L L Third AR makes H landfall over British H Columbia/Pacific Northwest 1st AR Brief pulse 2nd AR of IVT • The first AR is forecast make landfall over coastal Oregon before 12Z 13 Nov in association with a weaking frontal boundary (Figure A) • After the first AR dissipates,
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic History of Siletzia, a Large Igneous Province in the Oregon And
    Geologic history of Siletzia, a large igneous province in the Oregon and Washington Coast Range: Correlation to the geomagnetic polarity time scale and implications for a long-lived Yellowstone hotspot Wells, R., Bukry, D., Friedman, R., Pyle, D., Duncan, R., Haeussler, P., & Wooden, J. (2014). Geologic history of Siletzia, a large igneous province in the Oregon and Washington Coast Range: Correlation to the geomagnetic polarity time scale and implications for a long-lived Yellowstone hotspot. Geosphere, 10 (4), 692-719. doi:10.1130/GES01018.1 10.1130/GES01018.1 Geological Society of America Version of Record http://cdss.library.oregonstate.edu/sa-termsofuse Downloaded from geosphere.gsapubs.org on September 10, 2014 Geologic history of Siletzia, a large igneous province in the Oregon and Washington Coast Range: Correlation to the geomagnetic polarity time scale and implications for a long-lived Yellowstone hotspot Ray Wells1, David Bukry1, Richard Friedman2, Doug Pyle3, Robert Duncan4, Peter Haeussler5, and Joe Wooden6 1U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefi eld Road, Menlo Park, California 94025-3561, USA 2Pacifi c Centre for Isotopic and Geochemical Research, Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, 6339 Stores Road, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada 3Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 1680 East West Road, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA 4College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, 104 CEOAS Administration Building, Corvallis, Oregon 97331-5503, USA 5U.S. Geological Survey, 4210 University Drive, Anchorage, Alaska 99508-4626, USA 6School of Earth Sciences, Stanford University, 397 Panama Mall Mitchell Building 101, Stanford, California 94305-2210, USA ABSTRACT frames, the Yellowstone hotspot (YHS) is on southern Vancouver Island (Canada) to Rose- or near an inferred northeast-striking Kula- burg, Oregon (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Range
    Alaska Range Introduction The heavily glacierized Alaska Range consists of a number of adjacent and discrete mountain ranges that extend in an arc more than 750 km long (figs. 1, 381). From east to west, named ranges include the Nutzotin, Mentas- ta, Amphitheater, Clearwater, Tokosha, Kichatna, Teocalli, Tordrillo, Terra Cotta, and Revelation Mountains. This arcuate mountain massif spans the area from the White River, just east of the Canadian Border, to Merrill Pass on the western side of Cook Inlet southwest of Anchorage. Many of the indi- Figure 381.—Index map of vidual ranges support glaciers. The total glacier area of the Alaska Range is the Alaska Range showing 2 approximately 13,900 km (Post and Meier, 1980, p. 45). Its several thousand the glacierized areas. Index glaciers range in size from tiny unnamed cirque glaciers with areas of less map modified from Field than 1 km2 to very large valley glaciers with lengths up to 76 km (Denton (1975a). Figure 382.—Enlargement of NOAA Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) image mosaic of the Alaska Range in summer 1995. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration image mosaic from Mike Fleming, Alaska Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Anchorage, Alaska. The numbers 1–5 indicate the seg- ments of the Alaska Range discussed in the text. K406 SATELLITE IMAGE ATLAS OF GLACIERS OF THE WORLD and Field, 1975a, p. 575) and areas of greater than 500 km2. Alaska Range glaciers extend in elevation from above 6,000 m, near the summit of Mount McKinley, to slightly more than 100 m above sea level at Capps and Triumvi- rate Glaciers in the southwestern part of the range.
    [Show full text]