DOCSLIB.ORG

The Uniqueness of the Integration Factor Associated with the Exchanged Heat in Thermodynamics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Uniqueness of the Integration Factor Associated with the Exchanged Heat in Thermodynamics The uniqueness of the integration factor associated with the exchanged heat in thermodynamics Yu-Han Ma1,2, Hui Dong2, Hai-Tao Quan3 and Chang-Pu Sun1,2* Address: Beijing Computational Science Research Center, Beijing 100193, China Address: Graduate School of China Academy of Engineering Physics, No. 10 Xibeiwang East Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100193, China Address: School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract State functions play important roles in thermodynamics. Different from the process function, such as the exchanged heat 훿푄 and the applied work 훿푊, the change of the state function can be expressed as an exact differential. We prove here that, for a generic thermodynamic system, only the inverse of the temperature, namely 1/푇, can serve as the integration factor for the exchanged heat 훿푄. The uniqueness of the integration factor invalidates any attempt to define other state functions associated with the exchanged heat, and in turn, reveals the incorrectness 2 of defining the entransy 퐸푣ℎ = 퐶푉푇 /2 as a state function by treating 푇 as an integration factor. We further show the errors in the derivation of entransy by treating the heat capacity 퐶푉 as a temperature-independent constant. I. Introduction State functions, e.g., the internal energy and the entropy, in thermodynamics characterize important features of the system in a thermal equilibrium state [1]. Physically, some quantities are process-dependent and thus cannot be treated as state functions, e.g., the exchanged heat 훿푄 and the applied work 훿푊. An integration factor 푓 can be utilized to convert the process function, e.g., the exchanged heat, into an exact differential (the change of a state function). Mathematically, the requirement of the state function can be expressed as follows: the change of the state function remains unchanged with any topological variation of the integration path on the parameter space [2]. In addition, the number of the integration factors is usually limited for any system with more than two thermodynamic variables. Such number of the integration factor is further reduced in order to define a universal state function without the dependence on the system characteristics [2]. It is a common sense that the inverse of the temperature, i.e., 1/푇, serves as the integration factor for the exchanged heat 훿푄, and thus a state function, the entropy can be defined. A relevant question arises here: is there any other universal integration factor associated with the exchanged heat 훿푄 for an arbitrary system? Several attempts on this issue have been made for both specific systems [3] and generic systems [4]. However, the uniqueness of the integration factor of interest for a generic thermodynamic system remains unexplored. In our current paper, from the first principle, we prove that only one factor, namely 1/푇, can serve as the integration factor to convert the exchanged heat into the state function. Such uniqueness invalidates any attempt to find new state functions associated with the exchanged heat 훿푄. It is worth mentioning that the introduction of the so-called “state function”, the entransy defined via 훿퐸푣ℎ = 푇훿푄 [5], in the realm of the heat transfer is an example of such attempt. The entransy is claimed to be a “state function” of a system characterizing its potential of heat transfer [5]. Since its appearance, it has triggered a lot of debates [6-10] over its validity as state function [6] as well as its usefulness [7-10] in the practical application in the field of heat transfer. In this paper, from the fundamental principles of thermodynamics [11-13] and with the help of statistical mechanics, we reveal the improperness and incorrectness of such a concept. The rest of the paper is organized as follow. In Sec. II, we prove the uniqueness of the integration factor 1/푇 and the resultant entropy as the state function. In Sec. III, we further discuss the errors in the definition of the entransy. The conclusions are given in Sec. IV II. Proof of the uniqueness of the integration factor ퟏ/푻 In this section, we will prove the uniqueness of the integration factor associated with the exchanged heat 훿푄. As an illustration, we first demonstrate the result in the ideal gas with the internal energy 푈, the temperature 푇, the volume 푉, and the pressure 푃. According to the first law of thermodynamics, the changed heat of the gas reads 훿푄 = 푑푈 − 훿푊, which can be further written as (with the work done on the ideal gas 훿푊 = −푃푑푉) 훿푄 = 푑푈 + 푃푑푉. (1) An infinitesimal change of a generic thermodynamic function Λ can be defined as 훿Λ = 푓(푇)훿푄, namely, 훿Λ = 푓(푇)(푑푈 + 푃푑푉). (2) Figure 1. The evolution path of the ideal gas in the parameter space 푇 − 푉 As illustrated in Fig. 1, the state (푇0, 푉0) at point A can be connected by two paths (푙1 푎푛푑 푙2) to the state (푇푓, 푉푓) at point B in the 푇 − 푉 space. If Λ is a state function, it is required that 푙1 푙2 ∫A→B 훿Λ = ∫A→B 훿Λ [2]. Accordingly, the loop integral of 훿Λ in the 푇 − 푉 space is strictly zero, namely, 푙1 푙2 푙1 푙2 ∮ 훿Λ = ∫ 훿Λ + ∫ 훿Λ = ∫ 훿Λ − ∫ 훿Λ = 0. (3) A→B B→A A→B A→B With Eq. (2), the above equation can be specifically written as 푛푅푇 ΔΛ = ∮ 훿Λ = ∮ 푓(푇) (퐶 푑푇 + 푑푉) = 0, (4) 푉 푉 where we have used 푑푈 = 퐶푉푑푇 and the equation of state of the ideal gas 푃푉 = 푛푅푇. Here, 퐶푉 is the heat capacity at a constant volume, 푛 is the number of moles of the gas, and 푅 is the gas constant. With Green’s theorem, the loop integral in Eq. (3) can be rewritten in the form of the surface integration as 휕 휕 푛푅푇 ΔΛ = ∬ { [푓(푇)퐶 ] − [푓(푇) ]} 푑푉푑푇 = 0. (5) 휕푉 푉 휕푇 푉 This equation is valid irrespective of the integral intervals in the 푇 − 푉 space. Hence, we have 휕퐶 휕 푛푅푇 푓(푇) 푉 − [푓(푇) ] = 0. (6) 휕푉 휕푇 푉 The fact 휕퐶푉/휕푉 = 0 for the ideal gas further simplifies the above equations to 휕 푛푅푇 [푓(푇) ] = 0, (7) 휕푇 푉 whose solution can be uniquely determined as 훼 푓(푇) = , (8) 푇 with 훼 being an arbitrary constant independent of the temperature 푇. Without losing generality, we choose 훼 = 1, i.e., 훿Λ = 훿푄/푇. Thus, 훿Λ is nothing but the change of the thermodynamic entropy 푑푆. In summary, we prove that for the classical ideal gas only one state function associated with the exchanged heat, namely the entropy, can be defined. A similar proof for such an ideal gas system was proposed by Weiss [3]. Having shown the uniqueness of the integration factor associated with the exchanged heat for the classical ideal gas, in the following, we will prove a theorem on the uniqueness of the integration factor associated with 훿푄 for a generic thermodynamic system. Theorem: For a generic thermodynamic system, the universal thermodynamic state function Λ can be defined as 푑Λ = 푓(푇, 휆)훿푄 , if and only if 푓(푇, 휆) = α/푇 with α, a system- independent constant. Proof: For a generic thermodynamic system with the internal energy 푈, the first law of thermodynamic law reads 훿푄 = 푑푈 − 훿푊 = 푑푈 − 푌푑휆, (9) where 푌 and 휆 are the generalized force and the generalized displacement, respectively. Similar to the discussions for the ideal gas system, the condition for 훿Λ = 푓(푇, 휆)훿푄 to be an exact differential (Λ to be a state function) is: For an arbitrary loop in the 푇 − 푉 space, we always have ΔΛ = ∮ 푓(푇, 휆)훿푄 = ∮ 푓(푇, 휆) (푑푈 − 푌푑휆) = 0. (10) Noticing the relation for the internal energy 휕푈 휕푈 푑푈 = 푑푇 + 푑휆, (11) 휕푇 휕휆 Eq. (10) can be rewritten in the form of the surface integration with Green’s theorem as 휕 휕푈 휕 휕푈 ΔΛ = ∬ { [푓(푇, 휆) ] − [푓(푇, 휆) ( − 푌)]} 푑휆푑푇 = 0. (12) 휕휆 휕푇 휕푇 휕휆 The above equation is valid irrespective of the integration intervals. Hence, we have 휕 휕푈 휕 휕푈 [푓(푇, 휆) ] − [푓(푇, 휆) ( − 푌)] = 0, (13) 휕휆 휕푇 휕푇 휕휆 which can be further simplified as 휕푈 휕푓(푇, 휆) 휕푌 휕푈 휕푓(푇, 휆) + 푓(푇, 휆) + (푌 − ) = 0. (14) 휕푇 휕휆 휕푇 휕휆 휕푇 In statistical mechanics, the internal energy and the generalized force can be written as [1] 푗=푁 푈 = ∑ 푝푗퐸푗 , (15) 푗=1 and 푗=푁 푑퐸푗 푌 = (∑ 푝 ) , (16) 푗 푑휆 푗=1 where 퐸푗 = 퐸푗(휆) (푗 = 1,2 ⋯ 푁) is the 푗-th energy level of the system [For simplicity, we consider a system with discrete energy levels. But it is straightforward to extend our discussions to systems with a continuous energy spectrum.], and it is 휆-dependent. 푒−훽퐸푗(휆) 푒−훽퐸푗 푝푗 = 푗=푁 ≡ (17) −훽퐸푗(휆) 푍 ∑푗=1 푒 is the corresponding thermal equilibrium distribution of the system on the 푗-th energy level with 훽 = 1/(푘퐵푇) as the inverse temperature and 푘퐵 as the Boltzmann constant. Combining Eqs. (15-17), we find 푗=푁 −훽퐸푗 2 2 휕푈 휕 푒 〈퐸푗 〉 − 푈 = (∑ 퐸푗) = 2 ≡ 퐶휆, (18) 휕푇 휕푇 푍 푘퐵푇 푗=1 푗=푁 푗=푁 −훽퐸푗 휕푌 휕 푒 푑퐸푗 훽 푑퐸푗 = (∑ ) = (∑ 푝 퐸 − 푈푌) , (19) 휕푇 휕푇 푍 푑휆 푇 푗 푗 푑휆 푗=1 푗=1 and 푗=푁 푗=푁 −훽퐸푗 휕푈 휕 푒 푑퐸푗 = (∑ 퐸 ) = 푌 + 훽푈푌 − 훽 ∑ 푝 퐸 . (20) 휕휆 휕휆 푍 푗 푗 푗 푑휆 푗=1 푗=1 Substituting the above three relations into Eq.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lecture 2 the First Law of Thermodynamics (Ch.1)
    Lecture 2 The First Law of Thermodynamics (Ch.1) Outline: 1. Internal Energy, Work, Heating 2. Energy Conservation – the First Law 3. Quasi-static processes 4. Enthalpy 5. Heat Capacity Internal Energy The internal energy of a system of particles, U, is the sum of the kinetic energy in the reference frame in which the center of mass is at rest and the potential energy arising from the forces of the particles on each other. system Difference between the total energy and the internal energy? boundary system U = kinetic + potential “environment” B The internal energy is a state function – it depends only on P the values of macroparameters (the state of a system), not on the method of preparation of this state (the “path” in the V macroparameter space is irrelevant). T A In equilibrium [ f (P,V,T)=0 ] : U = U (V, T) U depends on the kinetic energy of particles in a system and an average inter-particle distance (~ V-1/3) – interactions. For an ideal gas (no interactions) : U = U (T) - “pure” kinetic Internal Energy of an Ideal Gas f The internal energy of an ideal gas U = Nk T with f degrees of freedom: 2 B f ⇒ 3 (monatomic), 5 (diatomic), 6 (polyatomic) (here we consider only trans.+rotat. degrees of freedom, and neglect the vibrational ones that can be excited at very high temperatures) How does the internal energy of air in this (not-air-tight) room change with T if the external P = const? f ⎡ PV ⎤ f U =Nin room k= T Bin⎢ N room = ⎥ = PV 2 ⎣ kB T⎦ 2 - does not change at all, an increase of the kinetic energy of individual molecules with T is compensated by a decrease of their number.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Two Phase Flow Heat Exchangers for Next Generation Aircraft
    Wright State University CORE Scholar Browse all Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2017 Modeling Two Phase Flow Heat Exchangers for Next Generation Aircraft Hayder Hasan Jaafar Al-sarraf Wright State University Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all Part of the Mechanical Engineering Commons Repository Citation Al-sarraf, Hayder Hasan Jaafar, "Modeling Two Phase Flow Heat Exchangers for Next Generation Aircraft" (2017). Browse all Theses and Dissertations. 1831. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all/1831 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Browse all Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MODELING TWO PHASE FLOW HEAT EXCHANGERS FOR NEXT GENERATION AIRCRAFT A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering By HAYDER HASAN JAAFAR AL-SARRAF B.Sc. Mechanical Engineering, Kufa University, 2005 2017 Wright State University WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL July 3, 2017 I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY Hayder Hasan Jaafar Al-sarraf Entitled Modeling Two Phase Flow Heat Exchangers for Next Generation Aircraft BE ACCEPTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering. ________________________________ Rory Roberts, Ph.D. Thesis Director ________________________________ Joseph C. Slater, Ph.D., P.E. Department Chair Committee on Final Examination ______________________________ Rory Roberts, Ph.D. ______________________________ James Menart, Ph.D. ______________________________ Mitch Wolff, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermodynamics
    ME346A Introduction to Statistical Mechanics { Wei Cai { Stanford University { Win 2011 Handout 6. Thermodynamics January 26, 2011 Contents 1 Laws of thermodynamics 2 1.1 The zeroth law . .3 1.2 The first law . .4 1.3 The second law . .5 1.3.1 Efficiency of Carnot engine . .5 1.3.2 Alternative statements of the second law . .7 1.4 The third law . .8 2 Mathematics of thermodynamics 9 2.1 Equation of state . .9 2.2 Gibbs-Duhem relation . 11 2.2.1 Homogeneous function . 11 2.2.2 Virial theorem / Euler theorem . 12 2.3 Maxwell relations . 13 2.4 Legendre transform . 15 2.5 Thermodynamic potentials . 16 3 Worked examples 21 3.1 Thermodynamic potentials and Maxwell's relation . 21 3.2 Properties of ideal gas . 24 3.3 Gas expansion . 28 4 Irreversible processes 32 4.1 Entropy and irreversibility . 32 4.2 Variational statement of second law . 32 1 In the 1st lecture, we will discuss the concepts of thermodynamics, namely its 4 laws. The most important concepts are the second law and the notion of Entropy. (reading assignment: Reif x 3.10, 3.11) In the 2nd lecture, We will discuss the mathematics of thermodynamics, i.e. the machinery to make quantitative predictions. We will deal with partial derivatives and Legendre transforms. (reading assignment: Reif x 4.1-4.7, 5.1-5.12) 1 Laws of thermodynamics Thermodynamics is a branch of science connected with the nature of heat and its conver- sion to mechanical, electrical and chemical energy. (The Webster pocket dictionary defines, Thermodynamics: physics of heat.) Historically, it grew out of efforts to construct more efficient heat engines | devices for ex- tracting useful work from expanding hot gases (http://www.answers.com/thermodynamics).
    [Show full text]
  • Thermodynamic Stability: Free Energy and Chemical Equilibrium ©David Ronis Mcgill University
    Chemistry 223: Thermodynamic Stability: Free Energy and Chemical Equilibrium ©David Ronis McGill University 1. Spontaneity and Stability Under Various Conditions All the criteria for thermodynamic stability stem from the Clausius inequality,cf. Eq. (8.7.3). In particular,weshowed that for anypossible infinitesimal spontaneous change in nature, d− Q dS ≥ .(1) T Conversely,if d− Q dS < (2) T for every allowed change in state, then the system cannot spontaneously leave the current state NO MATTER WHAT;hence the system is in what is called stable equilibrium. The stability criterion becomes particularly simple if the system is adiabatically insulated from the surroundings. In this case, if all allowed variations lead to a decrease in entropy, then nothing will happen. The system will remain where it is. Said another way,the entropyofan adiabatically insulated stable equilibrium system is a maximum. Notice that the term allowed plays an important role. Forexample, if the system is in a constant volume container,changes in state or variations which lead to a change in the volume need not be considered eveniftheylead to an increase in the entropy. What if the system is not adiabatically insulated from the surroundings? Is there a more convenient test than Eq. (2)? The answer is yes. To see howitcomes about, note we can rewrite the criterion for stable equilibrium by using the first lawas − d Q = dE + Pop dV − µop dN > TdS,(3) which implies that dE + Pop dV − µop dN − TdS >0 (4) for all allowed variations if the system is in equilibrium. Equation (4) is the key stability result.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermodynamic Temperature
    Thermodynamic temperature Thermodynamic temperature is the absolute measure 1 Overview of temperature and is one of the principal parameters of thermodynamics. Temperature is a measure of the random submicroscopic Thermodynamic temperature is defined by the third law motions and vibrations of the particle constituents of of thermodynamics in which the theoretically lowest tem- matter. These motions comprise the internal energy of perature is the null or zero point. At this point, absolute a substance. More specifically, the thermodynamic tem- zero, the particle constituents of matter have minimal perature of any bulk quantity of matter is the measure motion and can become no colder.[1][2] In the quantum- of the average kinetic energy per classical (i.e., non- mechanical description, matter at absolute zero is in its quantum) degree of freedom of its constituent particles. ground state, which is its state of lowest energy. Thermo- “Translational motions” are almost always in the classical dynamic temperature is often also called absolute tem- regime. Translational motions are ordinary, whole-body perature, for two reasons: one, proposed by Kelvin, that movements in three-dimensional space in which particles it does not depend on the properties of a particular mate- move about and exchange energy in collisions. Figure 1 rial; two that it refers to an absolute zero according to the below shows translational motion in gases; Figure 4 be- properties of the ideal gas. low shows translational motion in solids. Thermodynamic temperature’s null point, absolute zero, is the temperature The International System of Units specifies a particular at which the particle constituents of matter are as close as scale for thermodynamic temperature.
    [Show full text]
  • AJR Ch6 Thermochemistry.Docx Slide 1 Chapter 6
    Chapter 6: Thermochemistry (Chemical Energy) (Ch6 in Chang, Ch6 in Jespersen) Energy is defined as the capacity to do work, or transfer heat. Work (w) - force (F) applied through a distance. Force - any kind of push or pull on an object. Chemists define work as directed energy change resulting from a process. The SI unit of work is the Joule 1 J = 1 kg m2/s2 (Also the calorie 1 cal = 4.184 J (exactly); and the Nutritional calorie 1 Cal = 1000 cal = 1 kcal. A calorie is the energy needed to increase the temperature of 1 g of water by 1 °C at standard atmospheric pressure. But since this depends on the atmospheric pressure and the starting temperature, there are several different definitions of the “calorie”). AJR Ch6 Thermochemistry.docx Slide 1 There are many different types of Energy: Radiant Energy is energy that comes from the sun (heating the Earth’s surface and the atmosphere). Thermal Energy is the energy associated with the random motion of atoms and molecules. Chemical Energy is stored within the structural units of chemical substances. It is determined by the type and arrangement of the atoms of the substance. Nuclear Energy is the energy stored within the collection of protons and neutrons of an atom. Kinetic Energy is the energy of motion. Chemists usually relate this to molecular and electronic motion and movement. It depends on the mass (m), and speed (v) of an object. ퟏ ke = mv2 ퟐ Potential Energy is due to the position relative to other objects. It is “stored energy” that results from attraction or repulsion (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Entropy Is the Only Finitely Observable Invariant
    JOURNAL OF MODERN DYNAMICS WEB SITE: http://www.math.psu.edu/jmd VOLUME 1, NO. 1, 2007, 93–105 ENTROPY IS THE ONLY FINITELY OBSERVABLE INVARIANT DONALD ORNSTEIN AND BENJAMIN WEISS (Communicated by Anatole Katok) ABSTRACT. Our main purpose is to present a surprising new characterization of the Shannon entropy of stationary ergodic processes. We will use two ba- sic concepts: isomorphism of stationary processes and a notion of finite ob- servability, and we will see how one is led, inevitably, to Shannon’s entropy. A function J with values in some metric space, defined on all finite-valued, stationary, ergodic processes is said to be finitely observable (FO) if there is a sequence of functions Sn(x1,x2,...,xn ) that for all processes X converges to X ∞ X J( ) for almost every realization x1 of . It is called an invariant if it re- turns the same value for isomorphic processes. We show that any finitely ob- servable invariant is necessarily a continuous function of the entropy. Several extensions of this result will also be given. 1. INTRODUCTION One of the central concepts in probability is the entropy of a process. It was first introduced in information theory by C. Shannon [S] as a measure of the av- erage informational content of stationary stochastic processes andwas then was carried over by A. Kolmogorov [K] to measure-preserving dynamical systems, and ever since it and various related invariants such as topological entropy have played a major role in the theory of dynamical systems. Our main purpose is to present a surprising new characterization of this in- variant.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermodynamics: First Law, Calorimetry, Enthalpy
    Thermodynamics: First Law, Calorimetry, Enthalpy Monday, January 23 CHEM 102H T. Hughbanks Calorimetry Reactions are usually done at either constant V (in a closed container) or constant P (open to the atmosphere). In either case, we can measure q by measuring a change in T (assuming we know heat capacities). Calorimetry: constant volume ∆U = q + w and w = -PexΔV If V is constant, then ΔV = 0, and w = 0. This leaves ∆U = qv, again, subscript v indicates const. volume. Measure ΔU by measuring heat released or taken up at constant volume. Calorimetry Problem When 0.2000 g of quinone (C6H4O2) is burned with excess oxygen in a bomb (constant volume) calorimeter, the temperature of the calorimeter increases by 3.26°C. The heat capacity of the calorimeter is known to be 1.56 kJ/°C. Find ΔU for the combustion of 1 mole of quinone. Calorimetry: Constant Pressure Reactions run in an open container will occur at constant P. Calorimetry done at constant pressure will measure heat: qp. How does this relate to ∆U, etc.? qP & ΔU ∆U = q + w = q - PΔV At constant V, PΔV term was zero, giving ∆U = qv. If P is constant and ΔT ≠ 0, then ΔV ≠ 0. – In particular, if gases are involved, PV = nRT wp ≠ 0, so ∆U ≠ qp Enthalpy: A New State Function It would be nice to have a state function which is directly related to qp: ∆(?) = qp We could then measure this function by calorimetry at constant pressure. Call this function enthalpy, H, defined by: H = U + PV Enthalpy Enthalpy: H = U + PV U, P, V all state functions, so H must also be a state function.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimal Design of a Hydro-Mechanical Transmission Power Split Hybrid Hydraulic Bus
    Optimal Design of a Hydro-Mechanical Transmission Power Split Hybrid Hydraulic Bus A dissertation SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Muhammad Iftishah Ramdan IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Adviser: Professor Kim A. Stelson December 2013 Copyright ©Muhammad Iftishah Ramdan. All rights reserved. Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to Professor Kim A. Stelson for his guidance and patience during his years as my adviser. I am also grateful to my sponsors, Malaysian Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) and University of Science, Malaysia (USM), for their financial support during my graduate studies. I would like to express my sincere appreciation to my entire family - my wife, my mother, and siblings, for their endless moral support and for always believing in me. i Dedication This thesis is dedicated to my father who succumbed to COPD, caused in part by the air pollution in Malaysia. I hope my work could be one of the steps towards improving the environment and the public health situation both in my native country and abroad. ii Abstract This research finds the optimal power-split drive train for hybrid hydraulic city bus. The research approaches the optimization problem by studying the characteristics of possible configurations offered by the power-split architecture. The critical speed ratio ( ) is ͍-$/ introduced in this research to represent power-split configurations and consequently simplifies the optimal configuration search process. This methodology allows the research to find the optimal configurations among the more complicated dual-staged power-split architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Process Manager Control Functions and Algorithms
    Advanced Process Manager Control Functions and Algorithms AP09-600 Implementation Advanced Process Manager - 1 Advanced Process Manager Control Functions and Algorithms AP09-600 Release 650 12/03 Notices and Trademarks © Copyright 2002 and 2003 by Honeywell Inc. Revision 05 – December 5, 2003 While this information is presented in good faith and believed to be accurate, Honeywell disclaims the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose and makes no express warranties except as may be stated in its written agreement with and for its customer. In no event is Honeywell liable to anyone for any indirect, special or consequential damages. The information and specifications in this document are subject to change without notice. TotalPlant and TDC 3000 are U. S. registered trademarks of Honeywell Inc. Other brand or product names are trademarks of their respective owners. Contacts World Wide Web The following Honeywell Web sites may be of interest to Industry Solutions customers. Honeywell Organization WWW Address (URL) Corporate http://www.honeywell.com Industry Solutions http://www.acs.honeywell.com International http://content.honeywell.com/global/ Telephone Contact us by telephone at the numbers listed below. Organization Phone Number United States and Honeywell International Inc. 1-800-343-0228 Sales Canada Industry Solutions 1-800-525-7439 Service 1-800-822-7673 Technical Support Asia Pacific Honeywell Asia Pacific Inc. (852) 23 31 9133 Hong Kong Europe Honeywell PACE [32-2] 728-2711 Brussels, Belgium Latin America Honeywell International Inc. (954) 845-2600 Sunrise, Florida U.S.A. Honeywell International Process Solutions 2500 West Union Hills Drive Phoenix, AZ 85027 1-800 343-0228 About This Publication This publication supports TotalPlant® Solution (TPS) system network Release 640.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermodynamics.Pdf
    1 Statistical Thermodynamics Professor Dmitry Garanin Thermodynamics February 24, 2021 I. PREFACE The course of Statistical Thermodynamics consist of two parts: Thermodynamics and Statistical Physics. These both branches of physics deal with systems of a large number of particles (atoms, molecules, etc.) at equilibrium. 3 19 One cm of an ideal gas under normal conditions contains NL = 2:69×10 atoms, the so-called Loschmidt number. Although one may describe the motion of the atoms with the help of Newton's equations, direct solution of such a large number of differential equations is impossible. On the other hand, one does not need the too detailed information about the motion of the individual particles, the microscopic behavior of the system. One is rather interested in the macroscopic quantities, such as the pressure P . Pressure in gases is due to the bombardment of the walls of the container by the flying atoms of the contained gas. It does not exist if there are only a few gas molecules. Macroscopic quantities such as pressure arise only in systems of a large number of particles. Both thermodynamics and statistical physics study macroscopic quantities and relations between them. Some macroscopics quantities, such as temperature and entropy, are non-mechanical. Equilibruim, or thermodynamic equilibrium, is the state of the system that is achieved after some time after time-dependent forces acting on the system have been switched off. One can say that the system approaches the equilibrium, if undisturbed. Again, thermodynamic equilibrium arises solely in macroscopic systems. There is no thermodynamic equilibrium in a system of a few particles that are moving according to the Newton's law.
    [Show full text]
  • Chem 340 - Lecture Notes 4 – Fall 2013 – State Function Manipulations
    Chem 340 - Lecture Notes 4 – Fall 2013 – State function manipulations Properties of State Functions State variables are interrelated by equation of state, so they are not independent, express relationship mathematically as a partial derivative, and only need two of T,V, P Example: Consider ideal gas: PV = nRT so P = f(V,T) = nRT/V, let n=1 2 Can now do derivatives: (P/V)T = -RT/V and : (P/T)P = R/V Full differential show variation with respect to one variable at a time, sum for both: (equations all taken from Engel, © Pearson) shows total change in P if have some change in V and in T Example, on hill and want to know how far down (dz) you will go if move some amount in x and another in y. contour map can tell, or if knew function could compute dzx from dz/dx for motion in x and dzy from dz/dy for motion in y total change in z is just sum: dz = (dz/dx)ydx + (dz/dy)xdy Note: for dz, small change (big ones need higher derivative) Can of course keep going with 2nd and 3rd derivatives or mixed ones For state functions the order of taking the derivative is not important, or The corollary works, reversed derivative equal determine if property is state function as above, state function has an exact differential: f = ∫df = ff - fi good examples are U and H, but, q and w are not state functions 1 Some handy calculus things: If z = f(x,y) can rearrange to x = g(y,x) or y = h(x,z) [e.g.P=nRT/V, V=nRT/P, T=PV/nR] Inversion: cyclic rule: So we can evaluate (P/V)T or (P/T)V for real system, use cyclic rule and inverse: divide both sides by (T/P)V get 1/(T/P)V=(P/T)V similarly (P/V)T=1/(V/P)T so get ratio of two volume changes cancel (V/T)P = V const.
    [Show full text]