Department of Defense Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Defense Program Annual Report to Congress

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Department of Defense Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Defense Program Annual Report to Congress Department of Defense Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Defense Program Annual Report to Congress May 2004 Copies of this report may be downloaded from the World Wide Web through the Deputy Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Chemical and Biological Defense Web Site at http://www.acq.osd.mil/cp under the reports section as an Adobe Acrobat (.pdf) file. The information in this report is updated as of February 27, 2004 unless specifically noted otherwise. Cleared for Public Release. Unlimited Distribution. Executive Summary This Annual Report of the Department of Defense (DoD) Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Defense Program, or CBRNDP, provides information in response to several reporting requirements. First, this report is provided in accordance with 50 USC 1523. (The complete reporting requirement is detailed at annex K.) This report is intended to assess: (1) the overall readiness of the Armed Forces to fight in a chemical-biological warfare environment and steps taken and planned to be taken to improve such readiness; and, (2) requirements for the chemical and biological warfare defense program, including requirements for training, detection, and protective equipment, for medical prophylaxis, and for treatment of casualties resulting from use of chemical and biological weapons. This report supplements the DoD Chemical and Biological Defense Program FY05 President’s budget, February 2004, which has been submitted to Congress.1 Second, section 2.7 of this report addresses the requirement to provide information on the costs incurred by, and payments made to, each contractor or other entity engaged in the production, storage, distribution, or marketing of the anthrax vaccine administered by the Department of Defense.2 Third, in response to a reporting requirement by the Senate Armed Services Committee3, DoD provides a report, which includes an analysis of the capacity and versatility of the test and evaluation (T&E) infrastructure to meet the requirements of current and planned chemical and biological defense research and development programs, including facilities for testing equipment with live agents and simulants and for animal testing; and, an identification of any actions needed to meet testing requirements. This report is provided as Annex J. Finally, a performance plan for FY03–05 is provided under a separate cover. This performance plan demonstrates compliance with the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA), and provides detailed information demonstrating linkage between research, development, and acquisition programs and the operational missions of the warfighter. The DoD CBRNDP is a key part of a comprehensive national strategy to counter the threat of CBRN weapons as outlined in The National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction, December 2002. The national strategy is based on three principle pillars: (1) Counterproliferation to Combat WMD Use; (2) Strengthened Nonproliferation to Combat WMD Proliferation; and, (3) Consequence Management to Respond to WMD Use. The DoD 1 Annex G details the CBRNDP budget and expenditures. For FY05, the total budget request is $1.197 billion, of which $0.560 billion is for procurement, and $0.637 billion is for research, development, test, and evaluation. 2 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 - Authorization Conference Report (H.R. Rep. No. 106- 945, page 719), Joint Biological Defense Program – Special Report on anthrax vaccine costs, acquisition strategy, and related issues. 3 FY04 Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC) Authorization Report (S. Rpt. 108-46 Report Language, p. 239) CBRN Defense Program Annual Report CBRNDP provides research, development, and acquisition (RDA) programs primarily to support the first and third pillars. In support of counterproliferation, the DoD CBRNDP provides operational capabilities tailored to the unique characteristics of the various chemical and biological weapons, including emerging threats, in support of passive defense, force protection, and consequence management missions. These capabilities provide U.S. forces the ability to rapidly and effectively mitigate the effects of a CBRN attack against our deployed forces. In support of counterproliferation, the DoD CBRNDP provides capabilities to respond to the effects of WMD use against our forces deployed abroad, and in the homeland. In addition, the DoD CBRNDP supports the “1-4-2-1” force planning construct articulated in the Department of Defense Annual Report to the President and the Congress, September 2002. Put succinctly, the DoD CBRNDP will support “1-4-2-1” force planning to accomplish the following: • “The United States will maintain sufficient military forces to protect its people, territory, and critical defense-related infrastructure against attacks from outside its borders, as U.S. law permits.” (that is, 1); • “Deter aggression in four critical theaters: Europe, Northeast Asia, the Asian littorals, and the Middle East/Southeast Asia” (that is, 4); • “Swiftly defeat aggression in any two theaters of operation in overlapping timeframes” (that is, 2); and, • “Decisively defeat an adversary in one of the two theaters, including the ability to occupy territory or set the conditions for a regime change” (that is, 1). System-specific requirements to support the 1-4-2-1 force planning construct are not available at this time. The Services are conducting a study this year that will provide the analytical basis for defining requirements for each Service and for total Joint requirements. Capabilities developed and fielded by the CBRNDP in support of OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM, as well as lessons learned from this operation, are documented in Chapter 3 and Annex G of this report. The threat from CBRN weapons is comprised of a complex variety of chemical weapons—including nerve, blood, blister, and choking agents, toxic industrial chemicals, and novel threat agents—biological weapons—including viruses, bacteria, ricketssial, and toxin agents, and potentially novel or genetically engineered agents, as well as emerging infectious diseases—and radiological and nuclear weapons, including “dirty bombs.” The threat is complicated by the numerous potential means of delivering these weapons, including bombs, spray devices, missiles, or novel delivery devices. In addition, more than 20 states and several non-state organizations may have or be pursuing CBRN weapons capabilities that could pose threats to U.S. forces operating abroad or within the United States. The unique physical, toxicological, destructive, and other properties of each type of CBRN threat requires that operational and technological responses be tailored to the threat and to the diverse requirements of military operations supporting national security and homeland security missions. The FY05 President’s Budget Submission for the DoD CBRNDP builds on the existing capabilities fielded to protect U.S. forces against CBRN threats. The CBRNDP budget provides a balanced investment strategy that includes investment in procurement of capabilities to protect U.S. forces in the near-term (FY05), investment in advanced development to protect ii Executive Summary U.S. forces in the mid-term (FY06–09), and investment in basic research and the science and technology base to protect U.S. forces through the far term (FY10–19) and beyond. Chapter 2 provides modernization tables for each commodity area—contamination avoidance, battlespace management, individual and collective protection, decontamination, medical systems, and consequence management—summarizing planned progress through the far-term as a result of the RDA investment. The FY05 CBRNDP budget provides a balanced investment that provides the comprehensive array of systems and capabilities balanced among the operational capa- bilities to Sense (Reconnaissance, Detection, and Identification), Shape (Battlespace Manage- ment), and Shield (Individual & Collective Protection), and Sustain (Decontamination and Restoration) U.S. forces for passive defense, force protection, and consequence management missions. In FY05, the CBRNDP will start or continue procurement on a variety of CBRN defense systems intended to provide U.S. forces with the best available equipment to survive, fight, and win in CBRN contaminated environments. Systems beginning procurement in FY05 include the Joint Effects Model (JEM)—an advanced hazard prediction and effects capability —and the Joint Protective Aircrew Ensemble (JPACE)—a CBRN protective clothing ensemble intended for use by all military aviators and aircrew for all fixed wing and rotary wing requirements. Programs continuing procurement include: • Joint Service General Purpose Mask (JSGPM) – a lightweight protective mask incorporating state-of-the-art technology to protect ground forces from current and future threats. • Joint Warning and Reporting Network (JWARN) Block I – a warning technology which will collect, analyze, identify, locate, report, and disseminate CBRN threat information • Joint Service Mask Leakage Tester (JSMLT) – a one-man portable device that is capable of determining serviceability, proper fit, and identifying defective components of current and future CBRN protective masks. • Joint Service Lightweight Integrated Suit Technology (JSLIST) – individual protective ensemble. • NBC Reconnaissance Vehicle (NBCRV) – an improved CBRN Reconnaissance Vehicle with remote/early warning and data fusion capabilities • Joint Biological Agent Identification and Diagnostic System (JBAIDS)
Recommended publications
  • AMIFOSTINE for INJECTION Incidence of Grade 2 Or Higher Xerostomia (RTOG Criteria)
    TABLE 4 AMIFOSTINE FOR INJECTION Incidence of Grade 2 or Higher Xerostomia (RTOG criteria) Amifostine for RT p-value only Injection +RT LBL-7062PD Acute DESCRIPTION 51% (75/148) 78% (120/153) p<0.0001 ( 90 days from Amifostine for Injection is an organic thiophosphate cytoprotective agent known chemically ɖ start of radiation) as 2-[(3-aminopropyl)amino]ethanethiol dihydrogen phosphate (ester) and has the following structural formula: Latea 35% (36/103) 57% (63/111) p=0.0016 (9-12 months H2N(CH2)3NH(CH2)2S-PO3H2 post radiation) Amifostine is a white crystalline powder which is freely soluble in water. Its empirical aBased on the number of patients for whom actual data were available. formula is C5H15N2O3PS and it has a molecular weight of 214.22. Amifostine for Injection is the trihydrate form of amifostine and is supplied as a sterile At one year following radiation, whole saliva collection following radiation showed that lyophilized powder requiring reconstitution for intravenous infusion. Each single-use 10 mL more patients given Amifostine for Injection produced >0.1 gm of saliva (72% vs. 49%). vial contains 500 mg of amifostine on the anhydrous basis. In addition, the median saliva production at one year was higher in those patients who CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY received amifostine (0.26 gm vs. 0.1 gm). Stimulated saliva collections did not show Amifostine is a prodrug that is dephosphorylated by alkaline phosphatase in tissues to a a difference between treatment arms. These improvements in saliva production were pharmacologically active free thiol metabolite. This metabolite is believed to be responsible supported by the patients’ subjective responses to a questionnaire regarding oral dryness.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Unapproved Products, Off-Label Use, and Black-Box Warning
    Use of Unapproved Products, Off-Label Use, and Black-Box Warning ... A Variation of Newton’s Third Law or the Practical Application of the Rule of Unin- tended Consequences … Considerations in Military Operational Medicine Jerome F. Pierson, RPh, PhD Executive Editors Note: As multiple medical research and development efforts (both in SOF and in conventional research units) offer new drugs and medical equipment to the battlefield, we need to understand the rules of engagement for use, which, are dif- ferent for individual providers versus military heath care systems. ABSTRACT This article discusses the regulatory requirements for the use of unapproved drugs and off-label use of drugs and provides specific examples for military medicine. Additionally, it explains issues associated with standardization by the Service as a designated set, kit, or outfit as opposed to a general guidance. The former situation can be interpreted as a de facto policy whereas the latter is an adaptation of practice of medicine. Recent news stories brought to light the challenges assaulted from many sides to include consumer groups who facing military medicine in an environment where dramatic at times advocate for greater safety and at other times de- life-saving measures have become the expected rather then mand quicker access to therapeutic breakthroughs as well the exception.1,2 However, many of these same life-saving as the pharmaceutical industry which faces demands from measures have the potential to place a practitioner in situa- stockholders for return on investment. Reliance upon re- tions of “damned if you do, damned if you don’t” with re- sults from controlled clinical trials is problematic in that it gard to adherence to various regulatory and legal hurdles.
    [Show full text]
  • Amifostine Is a Nephro-Protectant in Patients Receiving Treatment with Cisplatin- Myth, Mystery Or Matter-Of-Fact?
    Ha SS, Rubaina K, Lee CS, John V, Seetharamu N. Amifostine is a Nephro-Protectant in Patients Receiving Treatment with Cisplatin- Myth, Mystery or Matter-of-Fact?. J Nephrol Sci.2021;3(1):4-8 Review Article Open Access Amifostine is a Nephro-Protectant in Patients Receiving Treatment with Cisplatin- Myth, Mystery or Matter-of-Fact? Sin Sil Ha1, Kazi Rubaina1, Chung-Shien Lee1,2, Veena John2, Nagashree Seetharamu2* 1St. John’s University, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Health Professions, 8000 Utopia Parkway, Queens, NY 11439, USA. 2Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Donald & Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, 450 Lakeville Road, Lake Success, NY 11042, USA. Article Info Abstract Article Notes Despite reports of amifostine possibly protecting nephrotoxicity from Received: December 22, 2020 cisplatin, it has not been recommended by any guidelines committees or Accepted: February 01, 2021 routinely prescribed in clinical practice over the past decade. In this article, *Correspondence: we review literature and guidelines regarding use of amifostine in oncology *Dr. Nagashree Seetharamu, Division of Medical Oncology practice for protection against adverse effects from certain chemotherapeutic and Hematology, Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Donald agents, in particular as a nephro-protectant in patients receiving cisplatin. & Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, 450 Lakeville Road, Lake Success, NY 11042, USA; Email: [email protected]. Background Information ©2021 Seetharamu N. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Amifostine (Ethyol) is a prodrug that is dephosphorylated by alkaline phosphatase in tissues to a pharmacologically active free Keywords thiol metabolite.
    [Show full text]
  • AHFS Pharmacologic-Therapeutic Classification System
    AHFS Pharmacologic-Therapeutic Classification System Abacavir 48:24 - Mucolytic Agents - 382638 8:18.08.20 - HIV Nucleoside and Nucleotide Reverse Acitretin 84:92 - Skin and Mucous Membrane Agents, Abaloparatide 68:24.08 - Parathyroid Agents - 317036 Aclidinium Abatacept 12:08.08 - Antimuscarinics/Antispasmodics - 313022 92:36 - Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs - Acrivastine 92:20 - Immunomodulatory Agents - 306003 4:08 - Second Generation Antihistamines - 394040 Abciximab 48:04.08 - Second Generation Antihistamines - 394040 20:12.18 - Platelet-aggregation Inhibitors - 395014 Acyclovir Abemaciclib 8:18.32 - Nucleosides and Nucleotides - 381045 10:00 - Antineoplastic Agents - 317058 84:04.06 - Antivirals - 381036 Abiraterone Adalimumab; -adaz 10:00 - Antineoplastic Agents - 311027 92:36 - Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs - AbobotulinumtoxinA 56:92 - GI Drugs, Miscellaneous - 302046 92:20 - Immunomodulatory Agents - 302046 92:92 - Other Miscellaneous Therapeutic Agents - 12:20.92 - Skeletal Muscle Relaxants, Miscellaneous - Adapalene 84:92 - Skin and Mucous Membrane Agents, Acalabrutinib 10:00 - Antineoplastic Agents - 317059 Adefovir Acamprosate 8:18.32 - Nucleosides and Nucleotides - 302036 28:92 - Central Nervous System Agents, Adenosine 24:04.04.24 - Class IV Antiarrhythmics - 304010 Acarbose Adenovirus Vaccine Live Oral 68:20.02 - alpha-Glucosidase Inhibitors - 396015 80:12 - Vaccines - 315016 Acebutolol Ado-Trastuzumab 24:24 - beta-Adrenergic Blocking Agents - 387003 10:00 - Antineoplastic Agents - 313041 12:16.08.08 - Selective
    [Show full text]
  • Free Executive Summary
    Giving Full Measure to Countermeasures: Addressing Problems in the DoD Program to Develop Medical Countermeasures Against Biological Warfare Agents http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10908.html Committee on Accelerating the Research, Development, and Acquisition of Medical Countermeasures Against Biological Warfare Agents Medical Follow-up Agency and Board on Life Sciences Lois M. Joellenbeck, Jane S. Durch, and Leslie Z. Benet, Editors Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Giving Full Measure to Countermeasures: Addressing Problems in the DoD Program to Develop Medical Countermeasures Against Biological Warfare Agents http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10908.html THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medi- cine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance. Support for this project was provided by Contract No. DAMD17-02-C-0099 between the National Academy of Sciences and the U.S. Army. The views presented in this report are those of the Institute of Medicine and National Research Council Committee on Accelerat- ing the Research, Development, and Acquisition of Medical Countermeasures Against Bio- logical Warfare Agents and are not necessarily those of the funding agencies. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Giving full measure to countermeasures : addressing problems in the DOD program to de- velop medical countermeasures against biological warfare agents / Committee on Acceler- ating the Research, Development, and Acquisition of Medical Countermeasures against Bio- logical Warfare Agents, Medical Follow-up Agency and Board on Life Sciences ; Lois M.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Management of Biologic Casualties Handbook
    USAMRIID’s MEDICAL MANAGEMENT OF BIOLOGICAL CASUALTIES HANDBOOK Fourth Edition February 2001 U.S. ARMY MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES ¨ FORT DETRICK FREDERICK, MARYLAND 1 Sources of information: National Response Center 1-800-424-8802 or (for chem/bio hazards & terrorist events) 1-202-267-2675 National Domestic Preparedness Office: 1-202-324-9025 (for civilian use) Domestic Preparedness Chem/Bio Help line: 1-410-436-4484 or (Edgewood Ops Center - for military use) DSN 584-4484 USAMRIID Emergency Response Line: 1-888-872-7443 CDC'S Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Center: 1-770-488-7100 John's Hopkins Center for Civilian Biodefense: 1-410-223-1667 (Civilian Biodefense Studies) An Adobe Acrobat Reader (pdf file) version and a Palm OS Electronic version of this Handbook can both be downloaded from the Internet at: http://www.usamriid.army.mil/education/bluebook.html 2 USAMRIID’s MEDICAL MANAGEMENT OF BIOLOGICAL CASUALTIES HANDBOOK Fourth Edition February 2001 Editors: LTC Mark Kortepeter LTC George Christopher COL Ted Cieslak CDR Randall Culpepper CDR Robert Darling MAJ Julie Pavlin LTC John Rowe COL Kelly McKee, Jr. COL Edward Eitzen, Jr. Comments and suggestions are appreciated and should be addressed to: Operational Medicine Department Attn: MCMR-UIM-O U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) Fort Detrick, Maryland 21702-5011 3 PREFACE TO THE FOURTH EDITION The Medical Management of Biological Casualties Handbook, which has become affectionately known as the "Blue Book," has been enormously successful - far beyond our expectations. Since the first edition in 1993, the awareness of biological weapons in the United States has increased dramatically.
    [Show full text]
  • The President
    3 1999 Compilation and Parts 100±102 Revised as of January 1, 2000 The President Published by: Office of the Federal Register National Archives and Records Administration A Special Edition of the Federal Register VerDate 11-MAY-2000 08:53 Aug 11, 2000 Jkt 190004 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 8091 Sfmt 8091 Y:\SGML\190004F.XXX pfrm07 PsN: 190004F U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 2000 For sale by U.S. Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop: SSOP, Washington, DC 20402±9328 ii VerDate 11-MAY-2000 08:53 Aug 11, 2000 Jkt 190004 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 8092 Sfmt 8092 Y:\SGML\190004F.XXX pfrm07 PsN: 190004F Table of Contents Page List of Title 3 Compilations ....................................................................... iv Explanation of the Code of Federal Regulations ........................................... v Explanation of This Title ........................................................................... ix How To Cite This Title ............................................................................... xi Title 3 ......................................................................................................... xiii 1999 CompilationÐPresidential Documents .................................... 1 Chapter IÐExecutive Office of the President .................................. 325 Title 3 Finding Aids .................................................................................... 335 Tables .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Management of Biological Casualties Handbook
    USAMRIID’s MEDICAL MANAGEMENT OF BIOLOGICAL CASUALTIES HANDBOOK Sixth Edition April 2005 U.S. ARMY MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES FORT DETRICK FREDERICK, MARYLAND Emergency Response Numbers National Response Center: 1-800-424-8802 or (for chem/bio hazards & terrorist events) 1-202-267-2675 National Domestic Preparedness Office: 1-202-324-9025 (for civilian use) Domestic Preparedness Chem/Bio Helpline: 1-410-436-4484 or (Edgewood Ops Center – for military use) DSN 584-4484 USAMRIID’s Emergency Response Line: 1-888-872-7443 CDC'S Emergency Response Line: 1-770-488-7100 Handbook Download Site An Adobe Acrobat Reader (pdf file) version of this handbook can be downloaded from the internet at the following url: http://www.usamriid.army.mil USAMRIID’s MEDICAL MANAGEMENT OF BIOLOGICAL CASUALTIES HANDBOOK Sixth Edition April 2005 Lead Editor Lt Col Jon B. Woods, MC, USAF Contributing Editors CAPT Robert G. Darling, MC, USN LTC Zygmunt F. Dembek, MS, USAR Lt Col Bridget K. Carr, MSC, USAF COL Ted J. Cieslak, MC, USA LCDR James V. Lawler, MC, USN MAJ Anthony C. Littrell, MC, USA LTC Mark G. Kortepeter, MC, USA LTC Nelson W. Rebert, MS, USA LTC Scott A. Stanek, MC, USA COL James W. Martin, MC, USA Comments and suggestions are appreciated and should be addressed to: Operational Medicine Department Attn: MCMR-UIM-O U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) Fort Detrick, Maryland 21702-5011 PREFACE TO THE SIXTH EDITION The Medical Management of Biological Casualties Handbook, which has become affectionately known as the "Blue Book," has been enormously successful - far beyond our expectations.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Order 13139—Improving Health Protection of Military
    Administration of William J. Clinton, 1999 / Sept. 30 1875 (7) Department of Transportation; continue to serve after the expiration of their (8) Environmental Protection Agency; term until a successor is appointed. A mem- (9) Office of Management and Budget; ber appointed to fill an unexpired term will (10) National Security Council; be appointed for the remainder of such (11) Office of National Drug Control Pol- term.'' icy; Sec. 9. This order shall be effective Sep- (12) Council on Environmental Quality; tember 30, 1999. (13) Office of Cabinet Affairs; William J. Clinton (14) National Economic Council; (15) Domestic Policy Council; and The White House, (16) United States Coast Guard.'' September 30, 1999. Sec. 7. Executive Order 12367, as amend- ed, is further amended as follows: [Filed with the Office of the Federal Register, (a) in section 1, the text ``the director of 9:23 a.m., October 1, 1999] the International Communication Agency,'' NOTE: This Executive order was published in the is deleted; Federal Register on October 4. (b) in section 2, delete the first sentence and insert in lieu thereof ``The Committee shall advise, provide recommendations to, Executive Order 13139ÐImproving and assist the President, the National En- Health Protection of Military dowment of the Arts, the National Endow- Personnel Participating in Particular ment for the Humanities, and the Institute Military Operations of Museum and Library Services on matters September 30, 1999 relating to the arts and the humanities. The Committee shall initiate and assist
    [Show full text]
  • (HE) Technologies in the Military Be Ethically Assessed? Philip Andrew Taraska
    Duquesne University Duquesne Scholarship Collection Electronic Theses and Dissertations Spring 1-1-2017 How Can the Use of Human Enhancement (HE) Technologies in the Military Be Ethically Assessed? Philip Andrew Taraska Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/etd Recommended Citation Taraska, P. A. (2017). How Can the Use of Human Enhancement (HE) Technologies in the Military Be Ethically Assessed? (Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/148 This One-year Embargo is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HOW CAN THE USE OF HUMAN ENHANCEMENT (HE) TECHNOLOGIES IN THE MILITARY BE ETHICALLY ASSESSED? A Dissertation Submitted to the McAnulty College and Graduate School of Liberal Arts Duquesne University In partial fulfillment for the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Philip Andrew Taraska May 2017 Copyright by Philip Andrew Taraska 2017 HOW CAN THE USE OF HUMAN ENHANCEMENT (HE) TECHNOLOGIES IN THE MILITARY BE ETHICALLY ASSESSED? By Philip Andrew Taraska Approved April 5, 2017 ________________________ ________________________ Henk ten Have, MD, PhD Gerard Magill, PhD Director, Center for Healthcare Ethics The Vernon F. Gallagher Chair Professor of Healthcare Ethics Professor of Healthcare Ethics (Committee Chair) (Committee Member)
    [Show full text]
  • JOHN DOE #1, Et Al, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) V
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________ ) JOHN DOE #1, et al, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 03-707 (EGS) ) DONALD H. RUMSFELD, et al ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs, members of the active duty and selected National Guardsmen components of the Armed Forces as well as civilian contract employees of the Department of Defense ("DoD") who have submitted or have been instructed to submit to anthrax vaccinations without their consent pursuant to the Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program ("AVIP"), commenced this action against the Secretary of Defense (Donald Rumsfeld), the Secretary of Health and Human Services (Tommy Thompson), and the Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration (Mark McClellan). Because plaintiffs maintain that Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed ("AVA") is an experimental drug unlicensed for its present use and that the AVIP violates federal law (10 U.S.C. § 1107), a Presidential Executive Order (Executive Order 13139), and the 1 DoD's own regulations (DoD Directive 6200.2), plaintiffs ask that in the absence of a presidential waiver the Court enjoin the DoD from inoculating them without their informed consent. Plaintiffs allege three causes of action against defendants: (1) violation of the Administrative Procedure Act ("APA") by defendant DoD based on the DoD's failure to follow federal law, a presidential executive order, and DoD directive with respect to its AVIP; (2) violation of the APA by defendant DoD for its intent to inoculate plaintiffs with an unlicensed drug that is unapproved for its intended use; and (3) violation of the APA by the defendants' alteration of the licensed Federal Drug Administration ("FDA")- approved schedule of vaccination which rendered AVA a drug unapproved for its intended use.1 Defendants DoD and FDA maintain that the issues plaintiffs present are non-justiciable and that plaintiffs fail to present an evidentiary basis sufficient to support standing at the preliminary injunction stage.
    [Show full text]
  • Radioprotective Agents and Enhancers Factors. Preventive and Therapeutic Strategies for Oxidative Induced Radiotherapy Damages in Hematological Malignancies
    antioxidants Review Radioprotective Agents and Enhancers Factors. Preventive and Therapeutic Strategies for Oxidative Induced Radiotherapy Damages in Hematological Malignancies 1, 2, 3 3 Andrea Gaetano Allegra y, Federica Mannino y, Vanessa Innao , Caterina Musolino and Alessandro Allegra 3,* 1 Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Experimental, and Clinical Sciences “Mario Serio”, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, 50100 Florence, Italy; [email protected] 2 Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, c/o AOU Policlinico G. Martino, Via C. Valeria Gazzi, 98125 Messina, Italy; [email protected] 3 Department of Human Pathology in Adulthood and Childhood “Gaetano Barresi”, Division of Haematology, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy; [email protected] (V.I.); [email protected] (C.M.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-090-221-2364 These authors contributed equally. y Received: 15 October 2020; Accepted: 10 November 2020; Published: 12 November 2020 Abstract: Radiation therapy plays a critical role in the management of a wide range of hematologic malignancies. It is well known that the post-irradiation damages both in the bone marrow and in other organs are the main causes of post-irradiation morbidity and mortality. Tumor control without producing extensive damage to the surrounding normal cells, through the use of radioprotectors, is of special clinical relevance in radiotherapy. An increasing amount of data is helping to clarify the role of oxidative stress in toxicity and therapy response. Radioprotective agents are substances that moderate the oxidative effects of radiation on healthy normal tissues while preserving the sensitivity to radiation damage in tumor cells. As well as the substances capable of carrying out a protective action against the oxidative damage caused by radiotherapy, other substances have been identified as possible enhancers of the radiotherapy and cytotoxic activity via an oxidative effect.
    [Show full text]