<<

MARCEL DEKRERJNC • 270 MADISON AVENUE NEW YORK, NY6

©2002 Marcel Dekker, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be used or reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Marcel Dekker, Inc.

Journal of Toxicology TOXIN REVIEWS Vol. 22, Nos. 2 & 3, pp. 327-350, 2003

Insect Management to Facilitate Preharvest Mycotoxin Management#

Patrick F. Dowd

Crop BioProtection Research Unit, U.S.D.A., Agricultural Research Service, National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research, Peoria, Illinois, USA

ABSTRACT

Many species of can facilitate the entry of mycotoxin-producing fungi to commodities such as cotton seed, , peanuts, and tree nuts. The mycotoxins most commonly associated with damage are aflatoxin and fumonisin. Insecticides will likely remain an important management tool, especially as predictive models for forecasting mycotoxigenic fungi or mycotoxins become available. Plants with high levels of resistance to insects that facilitate mycotoxins are likely to assist in mycotoxin management. Several studies now indicate Bt maize hybrids

#The mention of firm names or trade products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the United States Department of Agriculture over other firms or similar products not mentioned. Correspondence: Patrick F. Dowd, Crop BioProtection Research Unit, U.S.D.A., Agricultural Research Service, National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research, 1815 N. University St., Peoria, IL, USA; Fax: 309-681-6686; E-mail: dowdpf@mail. ncaur.usda.gov.

327

DOl: 10.I081ITXR-120024097 0731-3837 (Print); 1525-6057 (Online) Copyright C 2003 by Marcel Dekker, Inc. www.dekker.com MARCEL DEKKER, INC.. 270 MADISON AVENUE • NEW Yoiu, NY 10016

02002 Marcel Dekker, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be used or reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Marcel Dekker, Inc.

328 Dowd

that express the protein throughout the plant can prevent fumonisin levels rising above guideline levels of 1-2 ppm when European corn borers (Ostrinia nubilalis) are the predominant insect pests.

Key Words: Aspergillus; ; Aflatoxin; Fumonisin; Deoxynivalenol; Integrated pest management; Bt; Helicoverpa; Ostrinia; Carpophilus; Maize; Cotton; Peanut.

INTRODUCTION

Insects are one of several factors that can influence the levels of mycotoxins in commodities such as maize, peanuts, cottonseed, tree nuts and figs. insects can enhance the fungal infection process by carrying inoculum and causing damage that permits more ready entry of the . The literature dealing with insects and mycotoxins in all of the above mentioned commodities has been reviewed fairly recently (Dowd, 1998), so the present discussion will only briefly cover this prior information. This discussion will concentrate on maize, and also include some information on cotton seed and peanuts. Information on tree nuts will be covered in other articles in this series (see Campbell et al. and Michailides). The present review will concentrate on recent efforts in the major management areas of insecticide control, plant resistance (including Bt plants), and predictive models and management plans not covered in other articles in this series (see also Michailides, Campbell et al., Widstrom and Guo, this issue). Because insect damage frequently results in readily observable losses in yield and quality, controlling insects is an attractive indirect management tool for mycotoxins. The ready adoption of Bt maize and cotton for cost effective yield protection from caterpillar pests in the U.S. and elsewhere has apparently already led to reductions in mycotoxins in these crops.

INTERACTIONS

Considerable variability in the importance of insects in increasing mycotoxins has been reported. The relative importance of insects and other factors needs to be considered in the context of the complex environment in which they interact (see also article by Bruns, this issue). insects contaminated with a sufficiently high level of inoculum (versus airborne inoculum) may be necessary to overwhelm natural plant defenses. Insect damage may be the only way the fungus can enter under some conditions, or the fungus may be able to invade on its own under other conditions. The MARCEL DEKKER, INC. • 270 MADISON AVENUE • NEW YORK, NY 10016

02002 Marcel Dekker, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be used or reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Marcel Dekker, Inc.

Insect Management and Mycotoxins 329

relative importance of insect damage is dependent on the insect population, the degree of resistance of the plant to the fungus, and how the environment favors fungal inoculum and growth, and stresses the plant and its ability to produce resistance mechanisms. However, there are many examples where insect control has greatly reduced the levels of different mycotoxins (Dowd, 1998), indicating the importance of insects in mycotoxin production. Particularly convincing are the numbers of studies that now indicate Bt maize expressing the protein throughout the maize plant can greatly reduce levels of fumonisin when the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis, is the predominant insect pest. Mycotoxins can be toxic not only to people and livestock, but also insects. Mammals may be the inadvertent victims of fungal defenses initially evolutionarily derived against insects (Dowd, 1992a). The interpretation of the importance of mycotoxins and their effects on insects is further complicated by the associated fungal secondary metabolites and proteins, as well as the plant secondary metabolites, proteins, and nutritional status within which these interactions occur. The importance of Aspergillus flavus as an insect pathogen is still being debated. However, recent studies have shown that strains of A. flavus isolated from plant, insect, and human or sources were not specialized towards any particular host (St. Leger et al., 2000). Unlike other species of Aspergillus tested, conidia phagocytized by insect hemocytes were still able to germinate (St. Leger et al., 2000). A. flavus propagules may be proliferating in the hindgut of corn earworms, Helicoverpa zea, when consumed (Abel et al., 2002). Conversely, some insect species appear to benefit from the presence of aflatoxin producers (Dowd, 1992a) or mycotoxin-producing Fusarium spp. fungi (Schulthess et al., 2002), possibly in a manner analogous to that reported for fungi that are closely associated with insects (Dowd, 1992b). The activity of fungal metabolites towards insects has been recently reviewed (Dowd, 2002a). Interestingly, fungal resistance to, or attack of insects is comprised of multigenic defenses or pathogenicity factors, re- spectively, affecting several different biochemical targets. For example, A. flavus produces aflatoxin, which, after conversion to an epoxide, reacts with guanidine residues, ultimately resulting in transcription errors; cyclopia- zonic acid which inhibits calcium transport ATPase and appears to interfere with hydrostatic pressure regulation in insects; kojic acid which inhibits insect detoxifying enzymes, wound healing enzymes and pathogen defense enzymes (Dowd, 1999, 2002a), neuroactive compounds such as fl-aflatrem, and kotanins which inhibit NADH oxidase in insects (Dowd, 2002a). Degradative enzymes produced by A. flavus that can potentially attack the protective exoskeleton of insects include proteases (St. Leger et al., 2000) and lipases (Long et al., 1998). In addition, several other secondary

MAR EL DEKKER, INC. • 270 MADISON AVENUE • NEW YORK, NY 10016 --

©2002 Marcel Dekker, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be used or reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Marcel Dekker, Inc.

330 Dowd

Table 1. Insects associated with mycotoxins in different commodities.

Coffee (ochratoxins) coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei AM, AF

Cotton (aflatoxins)

boll weevil Anthonomus AM 2 grandis grandis

bollworm Helicoverpa zea AM 2

bollworm Helicoverpa zea AM 2

flea beetle Systena blanda AM 2

fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster AM 2

lygus bug Lygus hesperus AM 2

pink bollworm Pectinophora gossypiella AM 2

predatory beetle Collops vittatis AM 2

sap beetles Carpophilus spp. AM 2

stink bug Chlorochroa sayi AM 2

tarnished plant bug Lygus lineoliris AM 2

Figs (aflatoxins) dried fruit beetle Carpophilus AM hemipterus

fig wasp AM 2

flower thrip Franklinielli tritici AM 2

predatory mite Chelytus sp. AM 2

predatory mite Sejus pomi 2 AM thrip Heliothrips fasciatus AM 2

thrip Liothrips bremneri AM 2

drip Thrips bremneri AM 2

Maize (aflatoxins, fumonisins)

bronze psocid Ectopsocopsis AM 2 cryptomeriae

corn earworm Helicoverpa zea 2 AM corn rootworm adults Diabrotica spp. AM 2

ear borer Mussidia nigrivenella AF 3

European corn borer Ostrinia nubilalis AM, EU 2

fall arrnyworm Spodoptera frugiperda AM 2

maize/rice weevils AM, AF 2,3 Sitophilus spp. mite 2 Caloglyphys rodriguezi AM mold mite Tyrophagus AM 2 put rescentiae pink scavenger Sathrobrota rileyi AM caterpillar MARCEL DEKKER, INC. • 270 MADISON AVENUE . NEW YORK, NY 10016

02002 Marcel Dekker, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be used or reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Marcel Dekker, Inc.

Insect Management and Mycotoxins 331

Table 1. Continued. (aflatoxins, fumonisins) Maize scarab beetles not listed AM 2

sap beetles Carpophilus spp. AM, AF 2,3

Glischrochilus spp. AM 2 picnic beetles southwestern corn borer Diatrea grandiosella AM 2

stem borer Sesamia calamistis AF 3 stink bugs e.g. AM 2 Euchistus spp. sugarcane borer Eldana saccharina AF 3

western flower thrip Franklinella AM 2 occidentalis

Peanuts (aflatoxins) lesser cornstalk borer Elasmopalpus AM 2 lignosellus mite Caloglyphus sp. AF 2 mite Tyrophagus sp. AF 2 termite Odontotermes badius AF 2 termite Odontotennes latericus AF 2

Small grains - (Claviceps ergot toxins)

beetle Cantharus melanura EU 2

carabid beetle unspecified EU 2

fly Rhagonycha fulva EU 2

fly Melanostoma mellina EU 2

fungus gnat Sciara thomae EU 2

Tree nuts - (aflatoxins) codling Cydia pomonella AM 2 naval orange worm Amyelois transitella AM 2 pecan weevil Curculio caryae AM 2 southern green stink bug Nezara viridula AM 2 stink bug Thyanata pallidovirens AM 2

AF = reported from Africa, AM = reported from the Americas, EU = reported from Europe. I, (Vega et al., 1999) 2, (Dowd, 1998); 3, (Setarnou et al., 1998).

metabolites which have presently unknown modes of action are also produced by A. flavus and are active against insects (presumably in defending sclerotia) (Dowd, 2002a; Wicklow et al., 1994). No toxicity of fumonisin BI has been reported at 1000 ppm in 7 day assays to fall armyworms, Spodoptera frugiperda, (Dowd, unpublished data), and only long term exposures at unnatural concentrations (450 ppm) have been MARCEL DEl

332 Dowd

sufficient to produce a 20% growth reduction at 28 days in the mealworm Tenebrio molitor (Abado-Becognee et al., 1998). Thus, the high toxicity of a fumonisin producing strain of F. prolferatum to the aphid Schizaphis graminum (Ganassi et al., 2001) is unlikely. Each crop and geographic location can have a different composition of insects that promote mycotoxins. A summary of insects implicated in the enhancement of mycotoxins is provided in Table 1. The insect species that appear to be more consistently and broadly important in enhancing problems with mycotoxins are typically the more common species that attack the plant structures (nuts, boils, pods or ears) that can become contaminated with mycotoxins. Caterpillars such as the corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea; European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis; southwestern corn borer, Diatrea grandiosella; fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda; and beetles such as maize weevils, Sitophilus zeamais; and sap beetles, Carpophilus spp., appear to be the most important insects in promoting mycotoxin problems in the U.S. maize (Dowd, 1998). Corn earworms, Helicoverpa zea; tobacco budworms, Heliothis virescens; pink bollworms, Pectinophora gossipiella; and boll weevils, Anthonomis grandis; are the most important insects in promoting mycotoxin problems in cotton seed in the U.S. The lesser cornstalk borer, Elasmopalpus lignosellus, is most important in peanuts; while codling , Cydia pomonella, and navel orangeworms, Amyelois transitella, are the most important insects in promoting mycotoxins in tree nuts in the U.S. (Dowd, 1998).

RECENT BASIC RESEARCH

Several recent basic studies in the Americas have shed further light on the involvement of insects in the mycotoxin problem. A number of these studies have involved looking at the involvement of caterpillars. In studies designed to simulate natural conditions, 0. nubilalis larvae were able to acquire Fusarium nwnilifonne (F. verticillioides) spores from plant surfaces and carry them to ears, thereby causing infection in controlled studies (Sobek and Munkvold, 1999). Increases in symptomless kernel infection by F. moniliforme through the activity of 0. nubilalis larvae was also reported for the first time (Sobek and Munkvold, 1999). However, Gibberella zea infection was not increased by 0. nubilalis presence (Sobek and Munkvold, 1999). This information contrasts with that found for Bt maize studies, when DON (produced by G. zea) was found to be lower in Bt than corresponding nonBt hybrids under naturally occurring high populations of 0. nubilalis (Schaafsma et al., 2002) (see following discussion on Bt hybrids). Kernels which were damaged in milk to soft dough stage or MARCEL DEKKER, INC. • 270 MADISON AVENUE • NEW YORK, NY 10016 fli 02002 Marcel Dekker, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be used or reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Marcel Dekker, Inc.

Insect Management and Mycotoxins 333

earlier, as indicated by discolored pericarps, could have as much as several hundred ppm of fumonisin and were the predominant source of the fumonisin in ears collected from maize fields under natural conditions (Dowd et al., 1999). Studies in Mexico indicated aflatoxm levels were highly associated with sap beetle presence, primarily Carpophilus freemani (Rodriguez-del-Bosque et al., 1998). Sap beetles carried a commercial strain of the biocompetitor Bacillus subtilis from field placed autoinoculative devices to damaged maize ears, and reduced the percentage of ears having greater than 200 ppm of aflatoxm from 70% to less than 10% on ears subsequently inoculated with A. flavus (Dowd et al., 1998a). Volatile monitoring studies have indicated Fusarium verticillioides produces a complex of alcohols, acetaldehyde, and ethyl acetate that are attractive to the pineapple beetle, Carpophilus humeralis (Bartelt and Wicklow, 1999). Attractive compounds are the same as those previously reported for other Carpophilus sap beetle species (Bartelt et al., 1992; Dowd and Bartelt, 1991). In addition to sap beetles, other beetles and moths were also attracted to corn when it was field inoculated with F. verticillioides in Benin (Cardwell et al., 2000) (see below). A series of recent studies in maize conducted in tropical Africa (Benin) have identified several insect species which can facilitate the presence of both A. flavus and F. verticillioides. The most consistently important insect was the caterpillar ear borer, Mussidia nigrivenella (: ). Countrywide surveys over two years indicated only M. nigrivenella was significantly correlated with aflatoxins in both years (r=0.36 and 0.52) (Setamou et al., 1997). This species was also the major source of maize damage in both years (Setamou et al., 1998). Both the percent incidence and percent grains damaged were significantly correlated with aflatoxin B 1 in both years (Setamou et al., 1998). Other, less common insects that sometimes had significant positive correlations with either A.flavus and/or aflatoxin included the caterpillars, sugar cane borer, Eldana saccharina, and the stem borer, Sesamia calamistis; and the beetles, the maize weevil Sitophilus zeamais, Carpophilus sp. sap beetles, and combined Coleopteran spp. (Setamou et al., 1998). Interestingly, A. flavus had no effect on the survival of M. nigrivenella (Setamou et al., 1998). However, E. saccharina may be more important in promoting aflatoxin where they occur in higher density (Setamou et al., 1998) (as for Fusarium, see below). The cryptic behavior of M. nigrivenella makes it difficult to control with insecticides, so they are not a useful option for aflatoxin management (Setamou et al., 1998). Specific studies with four maize genotypes of different types of derived resistance/yield backgrounds did not indicate any significant effect on aflatoxin or fumonisin production, or insect damage (Cardwell et al., 2000). Interestingly, inoculation with F. verticillioides significantly increased the presence of several insect species, MARCEL DEKKER, INC. • 270 MADISON AVENUE • NEW YORK, NY 10016 02002 Marcel Dekker, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be used or reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Marcel Dekker, Inc.

334 Dowd

including S. calamistis, E. saccharina, but not M. nigrivenella (Cardwell et al., 2000). In addition, E. saccharina survived better in F. verticillioides inoculated stalks (Cardwell and Schuithess unpub., cited in (Cardwell et al., 2000). In contrast to prior studies in North America (e.g., Munkvold et al., 1997; Sobek and Munkvold, 1999), stem infection by F. verticillioides appeared more important in ultimate ear infection, as opposed to inoculum that landed on the ear (Schulthess et al., 2002). Inoculation with F. verticillioides significantly increased incidence of Eldana saccharina, Cryptophiebia leucotreta, Chilo spp., and pooled beetle species (Schulthess et al., 2002).

INSECTICIDES

Much prior work has focused on frequency and timing of insecticide applications. Unfortunately, in most cases uneconomical numbers of insecticide applications have been needed to reduce mycotoxin contamination to desired levels (Dowd, 1998). For example, six weekly applications of insecticides reduced aflatoxin in corn from 191 ppb to 2.8 ppb in Louisiana (Smith and Riley, 1992). Some recent studies have tested adherent malathion granules prepared from a maize product. The advantages of this formulation included: 1) application at a reduced rate of active ingredient to maize, 2) greater resistance to washoff by rain or dislodgement by scouts or equip- ment, and 3) selectivity by reducing mortality to beneficial insects (which would not feed on the granules). When properly applied, these granules did provide longer lasting, more selective control as good as or better than multiple applications of commercial formulations, and reduced ear mold and mycotoxins, including in commercial fields of specialty corn (Dowd et al., 1998b, 1999, 2000a). However, control efficacy of this formulation is not as good as that seen with maize that expresses the Bacillus thuringiensis crystal protein (Bt maize) throughout the plant, which typically kills all 0. nubilalis that attempt to feed on the plants (see below). The use of insecticides does remain a necessary component of some management plans where econom- ically practical (see below). For example, insecticides are apparently still being used as an important component of aflatoxin management strategies in maize in Mexico.

PLANT RESISTANCE

Plant resistance to insects is now receiving most of the insect-based mycotoxin control effort at various locations. As indicated earlier, because - MARL Dmua, INC. • 270 MADISON AvENuE YORK, NY 10016 02002 Marcel Dekker, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be used or reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Marcel Dekker, Inc.

Insect Management and Mycotoxins 335

insects can cause dramatic reductions in yield and quality, and because plant resistance is a more economical way to control insects, especially for lower value crops such as maize, varieties that contain insect resistance as a yield and quality protectant are often readily adopted by growers. In addition, considerable advances have been made in discovering and in- corporating insect resistance traits in tree nuts such as almonds, pistachios and walnuts by conventional breeding and through biotechnology (see articles by Michailides and Campbell et al., this issue). Insect resistant maize varieties are being identified, and mycotoxin resistant varieties are being examined for cross resistance to insects. It is likely that common mechanisms may be involved in both fungal and insect resistance (see following discussion). For example, enhanced peroxidase activity appeared to be an important insect and fungal resistance mechanism in Mp313E, which is also resistant to Aspergillus and aflatoxin production (Dowd, I 994a,b). Studies with transgenic plants that expressed high levels of tobacco anionic peroxidase indicated enhanced resistance to insects in three lines of tobacco (Dowd and Lagrimini, 1997) tomato (Dowd et al., 1998c), sweet gum (Dowd et al., 1998d), and especially maize (Privalle et al., 1999). More recently, strong silk resistance to caterpillars that appears nonmaysin based was discovered in the inbred Tex6 (Dowd and White, 2002). In a study that examined insect and afiatoxin resistance in maize, one maize line, Mp80:04, was found to have both resistance to aflatoxin production and resistance to D. grandiosella (Williams et al., 2002a). Some drought-resistant germplasm that had resistance to A. flavus and aflatoxin production was also insect resistant (Tubijika and Damann, 2001). Genetic markers and controlling factors for the insecticidal maize secondary me- tabolite maysin (a derivative of the flavonoid luteolin), its analogs, and chlorogemc acid have been identified (Guo et al., 2001a,b) (see article in this issue by Widstrom and Guo). Hemicellulose (Williams et al., 1998) and a cysteine protease have been identified as important insect resistance mechanisms of some maize inbreds (Penchan et al., 1999, 2000, 2002). Maize ribosome inactivating protein (RIP), now demonstrated to be anti- fungal towards A. flavus (Nielsen et al., 2002) has also recently been iden- tified as an insect resistance mechanism, and been validated in transgenic plants (Dowd et al., 1998e, 2000b). Work with Bt maize at several locations has indicated what a tremendous reduction in mycotoxin levels can potentially occur when high levels of insect resistance are available. In small plot studies run under controlled conditions in Iowa using spore contaminated larvae of 0. nubilalis and several different Bt events, overall reductions in fumonisins ranged from less than two fold in some years, to over 10 fold in others (Munkvold et al., 1999). The degree of reduction was dependent on the type of transformation event. For example, MARCEL DEKKER, INC. • 270 MADISON AVENUE • NEw YORK, NY 10016 02002 Marcel Dekker, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be used or reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Marcel Dekker, Inc.

336 Dowd

BT 1 and MON810 hybrids, which have the highest and most consistent expression of the Bt protein throughout the plant, also have the greatest and most consistent reductions in fumonisins relative to nonllt hybrids (Munkvold et al., 1999). Overall correlation R values between insect damaged kernels and fumonisin levels R values were 0.50 and 0.69 and highly significant in 1996 and 1997 respectively (Munkvold et al., 1999). Representative isogenic hybrids containing BT11 and MON810 constructs that were grown in Illinois had fumonisin levels up to 40x less than nonBt hybrids in 0.4 ha fields grown under natural conditions, where 0. nubilalis infestation rates ranged 80-90% (Dowd, 2000a). Significant reductions in fumonisin levels for Bt vs. nonBt hybrids were also seen in small plot studies run in the same years at a different location (Dowd, 2000a). Significant reductions in fumonisin for high Bt vs. low or no Bt ears were also noted in commercial fields up to 16 ha, although when H. zea infested more than 20% of the ears, typically no significant differences resulted (Dowd, 2001a). Interestingly, H. zea were noted damaging several kernels along a row without consuming the kernels in the Bt hybrids at significantly higher rates for high Bt compared to low or no Bt maize (Dowd, 2001a). In some hybrids, even without significant reductions in fumonisins, fumonisin levels were more consistently significantly correlated with some hybrid or hybrid pairs than others throughout the years and sites examined in both studies (Dowd, 2000a, 2001 a). This information suggests the genetic ability of the plant to resist the fungus in the absence of insect damage, as well as the plants ability to resist the fungal spread after introduction into insect damaged kernels also plays a role in how beneficial the Bt protein may be in reducing mycotoxins in hybrids with different backgrounds. Although a study in Ontario under natural conditions reported no significant reductions in lumunisin in Bt compared to nonBt hybrids in the presence of 0. nubilalis, mean values were less than 0.3 ppm in all years (Schaafsma et al., 2002). Studies in small plots under controlled conditions with Bt and nonBt hybrids using four hybrid pairs indicated significant reductions only when plants were not inoculated (method not specified) with Fusarium, with both infestations of 0. nubilalis and H. zea (Clements et al., 2002). Interestingly, studies sponsored by Monsanto where infestations were used in the U.S. (2000) have yielded smaller differences (2-3X) in reductions of fumonisin levels compared to 8-30 fold reductions in studies run under natural conditions in Europe (1997-1999, see below) (Hammond et al., 2002). There is also some evidence that Bt hybrids can reduce stalk rot caused by fumonisin-producing species of Fusarium (Gatch and Munkvold, 2002; Gatch et al., 2002). Studies done in Europe under natural conditions have indicated highly significant reductions (greater than lOx) in fumonisins when nonBt hybrids had fumonisin levels above 2 ppm (Bakan et al., 2002; Cahagnier and Melcion, 2000). These reductions in fumonisin are of the same degree as jfl MARCEL DEKKER, INC.. 270 MADISON AVENUE . NEW YORK, NY 10016 02002 Marcel Dekker, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be used or reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Marcel Dekker, Inc.

Insect Management and Mycotoxins 337

those that have been reported in the U.S. Studies in Italy also indicated significant reductions in fumonisin from 3 to 6 fold in 1999 (30 locations, 4 genotypes) and 1998 (4 locations, 2 genotypes), respectively, with a non- significant 10 fold reduction in 1997 (3 locations, 2 genotypes) (Pietri and Piva, 2000). However, many environmental effects can mitigate the efficacy of Bt hybrids in protecting against increases in fumonisin related to insect damage (Dowd, 2000a, 2001a). Obviously, if populations of 0. nubilalis are low, differences in fumonisin levels are not as likely to be as great as if populations are high. As mentioned previously, the expression pattern of the gene is important. Event 176 hybrids (which produce only low levels of the Bt protein in silks and kernels) have not proven very effective in indirectly reducing fumonisin under the same insect pressures for MON8I0 and Bt I events (Dowd, 2000a; Munkvold et al., 1999), nor has DBT418 (Munkvold et al., 1999). Correlations between insect damage and fumonisin have been more highly significant in some years than others for the same hybrid in different years, or the same hybrid at different locations in the same year, suggesting environmental factors are influencing the plants ability to defend itself in the absence of insects (i.e. the fungus is able to invade on its own) or else spread after insect damage at different rates (Dowd, 2000a, 2001a). The levels of natural fungal inoculum or type of inoculation method also seems to make a difference. Under natural conditions with relatively high European corn borer levels, significant reductions in fumonisins have been relatively consistent. However, more severe inoculation methods where the ear is damaged may result in less significant reductions. This also appears to be the case for aflatoxin studies (see below). There have also been some reports that Bt hybrids are capable of significantly reducing DON levels in maize. This is somewhat surprising, as insect damage has not been found to significantly increase levels of DON in corn in prior studies (Lew et al., 1991; Sobek and Munkvold, 1999). In studies in France and Spain, DON levels were significantly reduced in three cases, increased in one case, and were unchanged in one other (Bakan et al., 2002; Cahagnier and Melcion, 2000). Interestingly, significant reductions in nivalenol were reported from the same sites that had significant reductions in fumonisin and DON (Bakan et al., 2002; Cahagnier and Melcion, 2000). A significant reduction in zearalenone, but not fumonisin, was reported at the same site where a significant reduction in DON occurred (Bakan et al., 2002; Cahagnier and Melcion, 2000). No significant reductions in DON or zearalenone in Bt compared to nonBt maize occurred in Italy, but overall levels were low (Pietri and Piva, 2000). In some cases, presence of F. graminearum was actually increased in Bt maize stalks compared to nonBt hybrids, but this appeared due to a competitive advantage that occurred when cfJ MARCEL DEKXER, INC. • 270 MADISON AvENUE • NEW YORK, NY 10016 02002 Marcel Dekker, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be used or reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Marcel Dekker, Inc.

338 Dowd

potentially competitive F. pro4feratum or F. verticillioides, which are associated with damage by 0. nubilalis, were reduced in the Bt hybrid stalks (Gatch and Munkvold, 2002). However, Bt maize has not been as successful in reducing aflatoxin levels as fumonisin levels, as has been indicated by a few studies in the Midwest and Europe, and several studies in southeastern U.S. and Texas, where aflatoxin is more common (although this may be dependent on the method of inoculation used to some extent). Some studies in the Midwest have seen little effect on aulatoxin reductions under controlled conditions using 0. nubilalis, although aflatoxin levels in general were infrequent and quite low (Dowd, 2000a). More extensive studies in the Midwest under controlled conditions have indicated some significant reductions in aflatoxin for Bt compared to nonBt hybrids that express the protein throughout the plant when nondamaging inoculation techniques are used (Munkvold et al., 2000). In studies where a series of 11 Bt/nonBt hybrid pairs were inocu- lated using a pinboard, no significant differences in Aspergillus ear rot or aflatoxin were noted (Maupin et al., 2002). No reductions in aflatoxin were demonstrated in Bt vs. nonBt maize in Italy, but overall levels were low (Pietri and Piva, 2000). Results relating to indirect reduction of aflatoxin by Bt maize in the more southern part of the U.S. have initially been more disappointing compared to fumonisin results in the Midwest and Europe. This may be at least partly due to the significant insect damage that is still occurring to Bt ears for most of the transformation events in these areas due to H. zea and S. frugiperda, which are not greatly affected by most existing field maize Bt hybrids. Midwest adapted Bt hybrids still had high levels of aflatoxin when inoculated with A. flavus contaminated cob grits and D. grandiosella, but some reductions were noted with D. grandiosella inoculations alone (Windham et al., 1999). However, newer Bt hybrids that have better protection against H. zea and S. frugiperda have shown better results in studies where more natural inoculation methods are used. When A. flavus infested kernels were distributed among corn rows, the aflatoxin of Cry2Ab hybrids (M0N840) was significantly lower than CrylAb hybrids and nonBt hybrids in 2000 and significantly lower than nonBt hybrids in 2001 (Odvody and Chilcutt, 2002). The M0N840 hybrids had the lowest insect numbers and injury ratings, and ear insect injury rating at harvest was significantly associated with aflatoxin levels (Odvody and Chilcutt, 2002). Unlike methods that damaged kernels, inoculation methods that did not damage ears also showed some significant reduction in aflatoxin levels for some MON8I0 and Btll hybrids compared to nonBt hybrids that were infested with D. grandiosella, despite the presence of significant H. zea (Williams et al., 2002b). Most silk inoculated Bt hybrids also had significantly less aflatoxin than their nonBt counterparts (Williams et al., 2002b). MARCEL DEKKER, INC. • 270 MADISON AVENuE • NEW YORK, NY 10016 02002 Marcel Dekker, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be used or reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Marcel Dekker, Inc.

Insect Management and Mycotoxins 339

In addition to work with maize, levels of bright greenish yellow florescence have been significantly reduced in cotton seed in Bt cotton studies, suggesting aflatoxin may also be reduced provided growers harvest immediately after boll opening (Bock and Cotty, 1999; Cotty et al., 1997a,b). Bt walnuts (Dandekar et al., 2000a,b) and peanuts (Ozias-Akins et al., 2000, 2002) for insect resistance and aflatoxin reduction are also being explored. Enhancing insect resistance through biotechnological methods may be an approach worth following for other insects that promote mycotoxins as well. There is a trade-off between desirable specificity of proteins, and broadness of insect species control. It would be impractical to have to introduce a specific gene or gene set for every species of insect that can promote mycotoxin problems. The advantage of targeting insect populations as a strategy for indirectly reducing mycotoxins is that insect resistance can protect yields in an economically practical manner, as has been demon- strated with Bt corn. Resistance to corn earworms comparable to that seen for European corn borers in Bt 11 or Mon810 construct derived maize lines would be highly desirable, and may significantly help with mycotoxin problems in the southeastern U.S., Texas, Mexico, and other areas where aflatoxin is a continual problem from year to year. Maize lines with more than one Bt gene, targeting both the European corn borer and corn earworm, have been developed by Monsanto and were released in 2002 (although these are not approved by the EU). Some Btl 1 hybrids have reduced corn earworm incidence at milk stage maize by 10-fold (Dowd et al., 2002). Unfavorable environmental concerns on insect resistant hybrids produced by biotechnology, such as effects of the Bt gene placed in maize on beneficial insects or nontarget insects such as monarch butterflies noted in laboratory studies have not been demonstrated under field conditions (e.g. Dowd, 2000a,b, 2001a; Sears et al., 2001a). Gene frequency assump- tions for resistance management techniques also appear appropriate based on field studies quantitating resistance alleles (Andow et al., 2000; Tabashnik et al., 2001). Significant reductions of pesticide use have been noted in Bt compared to nonBt fields of maize (Carpenter and Gianessi, 2002) and cotton (Tabashnik et al., 2001). The Bt gene in maize does not adversely affect ethanol production (Dien et al., 2002), cattle growth or milk production (Folmer et al., 2002). However, acceptability of biotech- nology enhanced food crops remains a potential problem for both insect and fungal resistant materials, despite the health benefits that have already been demonstrated for these lines through reduction of mycotoxin levels. Continued concerns about the presence of antibiotic selectible marker genes, uncertain copy number and insertion site of transgenes, and potential MARCEL DEKKER, INC. • 270 MADISON AVENUE • NEW YORK, NY 10016 02002 Marcel Dekker, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be used or reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Marcel Dekker, Inc.

340 Dowd

allergenic properties of novel proteins (despite in vitro) testing) will remain challenges for this type of plant resistance strategy in the near future. Hybrids with limited Bt expression in seeds (i.e. event 176) have seldom yielded significant reductions in fumonisins (Dowd, 2000a; Munkvold et al., 1999). However, an experimental inbred that contained a pith pro- moter that produced high levels of the protein in silks (unlike event 176) but not seeds, was free of corn borer damage when corn borers were added to ears, compared to levels of infestation of 53% in the corresponding nonBt inbred (Dowd, 2000a). This information suggests that selective expression of insecticidal proteins sufficient to control mycotoxigenic fungi through insect control may indeed be possible without obtaining levels of concern of the transgenic protein in the part of the plant that is consumed by people or . As mentioned previously, it is entirely possible that selecting for both fungal and insect resistance involves the same factors, and they can be incorporated at the same time through breeding, biotechnology, or a combination. As discussed previously, there are common antiinsectan and antifungal properties of secondary metabolites, including phenolics, stil- benes, naphthoquinones, terpenes, lignins, flavonoids, N-aromatics, sesqui- terpene lactones and phytoalexins (Dowd, 1992a). The same proteins are also potentially involved in both fungal and insect resistance. For example, as mentioned above, common resistance proteins appear to include pero- xidase, lipoxygenase, ribosome inactivating proteins, chitinases, proteinase inhibitors, amylase inhibitors, and lectins (e.g. compare proteins mentioned in Bell, 1981; Dowd, 2002a; Gatehouse and Gatehouse, 2000; Selitrennik- off, 2001). In maize, insect and disease resistance have mapped to the same sites, and appear to be multigenic (e.g. McMullen and Simcox, 1995). It is also potentially important to determine effective combinations of proteins, in order to stabilize resistance in plants, and prevent development of resistance in insects and fungi. Most prevailing considerations have involved using proteins with different modes of action. However, issues such a the ability of the active toxin to penetrate to the target site may actually be the limiting factor. A new strategy was proposed recently, that involved examining proteins or other active compounds for function, and combining compounds of different functional classes (Dowd, 2002b).

INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS

Integrated management programs involving insect control have been in practice in Mexico since 1992 (CEMCA (Comite Estatal de Modemizacion del Campo del Agua), 1993). In the U.S., development of sophisticated MARCEL DEKXER, INC. • 270 MADISON AVENUE • NEW YORK NY 10016

02002 Marcel Dekker, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be used or reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Marcel Dekker, Inc.

Insect Management and Mycotoxins 341

programs acceptable to growers involving predictive computer programs have been more of a recent focus. For example, aflatoxin management systems for peanut involve insect management (Wilson, 1995). One important component of insect management is monitoring for insects, so that control measures will only be used when economically practical. Although monitoring tools for pests such as the codling moth exist, improvements have been made in attractants for the codling moth, which have potential for commercialization (Light et al., 2001). Attractants and trapping systems for sap beetles have been developed in order to make them commercially viable (Dowd, 2000b; Bartelt, 1997). The pheromone for the dusky sap beetle, Carpophilus lugubris, the most common sap beetle in midwest corn, was produced commercially starting in 2002 and compared well with prior materials that have been used (Dowd et al., 2002). An IPM program developed for the midwestern U.S. corn belt maize has been tested in central Illinois for two years, and involves participation of a large grower organization, a farm service organization, industry, and extension (Dowd, 2001b). A predictive computer program is crossed checked for validity against fields intensively sampled for insects, mold inoculum, and mycotoxins. Br maize is an important component of this system, but growers are somewhat reluctant to adapt due to the uncertain nature of the market. Insecticide treatment remains an important potential insect management strategy in nonBt maize fields in the presence of high populations of European corn borers, or for other insect pests such as the corn earworm. Predictions of fumonisins for most hybrids in commercial fields have been close to actual levels using data from commercial fields (Dowd et al., in press). Although growers remain interested, adoption and practice remains limited (and probably will be until elevators set fumonisin requirements). A comprehensive program for aflatoxin management in the southeastern U.S. in maize is being developed in Georgia, and involves an economic analysis of components and corresponding choices for both a preplant and growing season phase (Widstrom et al., 2002; Widstrom et al., 2000, article this issue).

CONCLUSIONS

Insects are an important factor in the presence of mycotoxins in several major crops. Targeting insects as a means for indirectly controlling myco- toxins has considerable value as control of insects themselves is typically an economically viable means just to protect yield and quality, which means it is readily adopted. The rapid adoption of Bt maize and cotton, and their associated reductions in mycotoxins in cases of high pressure of target insects, indicates the value of targeting insects for mycotoxin control. MARCEL DEKKER, INC. • 270 MADISON AvENUE • NEW YORK, NY 10016

02002 Marcel Dekker, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be used or reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Marcel Dekker, Inc.

342 Dowd

Insecticides are still likely to be of value in indirectly controlling mycotoxins in areas where Bt crops, or insects not affected by Bt crops, are planted. If plant resistance to insects is to be pursued as a strategy, a wider range of insect resistance mechanisms, or individual mechanisms with more broad spread efficacy against different insect species, will be needed.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I thank W. P. Williams and C. A. Abel for permission to cite work in press, and anonymous reviewers for useful suggestions. Omission of any additional relevant studies was not intentional.

REFERENCES

Ahado-Becognee, K., Fleurat-Lessard, F., Creyyp, E. E., Melcion, D. (1998). Effects of fumonisin B, on growth and metabolism of larvae of the yellow mealworm, Tenebrio molitor. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 86:135-143. Abe]. C. A., Abbas, H. K., Zablotowicz, R., Pollan, M., Dixon, K. (2002). The association between corn earworm damage and aflatoxin production in preharvest maize grain. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Fungal Genomics, 3rd Fumonism Elimination and 15th Aflatoxin Elimination Workshop, San Antonio. TX, Oct 23-35, 2002; Robens, J. F., Brown, R. L., eds. U.S.D.A., Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, pp. 113-114. Andow, D. A., Olson, D. M., Hellmich, R. L., Alstad, D. N., Hutchinson W. D. (2000). Frequency of resistance to Bacillus rhuringiensis toxin CryLAb in an Iowa population of European corn borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 93:26-30. Bakan. B., Melcion, D., Richard-Molard, D., Cahagnier, B. (2002). Fungal growth and Fusarium mycotoxin content in isogenic traditional maize and genetically modified maize grown in France and Spain. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50:728-73 1. Bartelt, R. J. (1997). Aggregation pheromones of Carpophilus spp. (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae): review of chemistry and biology. Recent Res. Dev. Entomol. 1:115-129. Bartelt, R. J., Wicklow, D. T. (1999). Volatiles from Fusarium verticillioides (Sacc.) Nireb. and their attractiveness to nitidulid beetles. J. Chem. Ecol. 47:2447-2454. Bartelt, R. J., Dowd, P. F., Vetter, R. S., Shorey, H. H., Baker, T. C. (1992). Responses of Carpophilus hemipterus (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae) and 1L3J MARCEL DEKKER, INC. • 270 MADISON AvENUE • NEW YORK, NY 10016 02002 Marcel Dekker, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be used or reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Marcel Dekker, Inc.

Insect Management and Mycotoxins 343

other sap beetles to the pheromone of C. hemipterus and host-related coattractants in California field tests. Environ. Entonwl. 21:1143- 1153. Bell, E. A. (1981). Biochemical mechanisms of disease resistance. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 32:21-81. Bock, C. H., Cotty, P. J. (1999). The relationship of gin date of aflatoxin contamination of cottonseed in Arizona. Plant Dis. 83:279-285. Cahagnier, B., Melcion, D. (2000). Mycotoxines de Fusarium dans les mais- grains a Ia recolte: relation entre la presence dinsectes (pyrale, sesamie) et la teneur en mycotoxines. In: Food Safety: Current Situa- tion and Perspectives in the European Community. Proceedings of the 6th International Feed Production Conference. Piacenza, Italy, Nov 2000; Piva, G., Masoero, F., eds. pp. 237-249. Cardwell, K. F., Kling, J. G., Maziya-Dixon, B., Bosque-Perez, N. A. (2000). Interactions between Fusarium verticillioides, Aspergillus fiavus, and insect infestation in four maize genotypes in lowland Africa 90:276- 284. Carpenter, J. E., Gianessi, L. P. Agricultural Biotechnology. Updated Benefit Estimates. National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy (verified 6 November 2002: www.ncfap.org/pub/biotech/updatedbeneflts.pdf. CEMCA (Comite Estatal de Modernizacion del Campo del Agua) (1993). Paquete Technologico integral para la Siembra del Maiz in Riego Zona Norte y Centro de Tamaulipas. Secretaria Agricltura y Recursos Hidraulicos. Clements, M. J., Campbell, K. W., White, D. G., Maragos, C. M., Pilcher, C. (2002). Effect of insect damage on Fusarium ear rot and fumonisin in Bt. and non-Bt. corn hybrids. Mycopathologia 155:34. Cotty, P. J., Bock, C., Howelland, D. R., Tellez, A. (1997a). Aflatoxin contamination of commercially grown transgenic Bt cottonseed. Proc. Beitwide Cotton ConI. National Cotton Council of America, pp. 108- 110. Cotty, P. J., Howell, D. R., Bock, C., Tellez, A. (1997b). Aflatoxin contamination of commercially grown transgenic Bt cottonseed. In: Proceedings of the 1997 Aflatoxin Elimination Workshop. Memphis, TN, Oct 26-28, 1997; Robens, J. F., Dorner, J., eds. U.S.D.A., A.R.S., Beltsville, MD, p. 13. Dandekar, A. M., McGranahan, G., Vail, P., Molyneux, R., Mahoney, N., Leslie, C., Uratsu, S., Tebbets, S. (2000a). Genetic engineering and breeding of walnuts for control of aflatoxin. In: Proceedings of the Aflatoxin/Fumonisin Workshop 2000. Yosemite, CA, Oct 25-27, 2000; Robens, J. F., Cary, J. W., Campbell, B. C., eds. U.S.D.A, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, pp. 108-109. MARCEL DEKKER, INC. • 270 MADISON AvttNuE • NEW YORK, NY 10016

02002 Marcel Dekker, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be used or reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Marcel Dekker, Inc.

344 Dowd

Dandekar, A. M., McGranahan, G., Vail, P., Molyneux, R., Mahoney, N., Leslie, C., Uratsu, S., Muir, R., Tebbets, S. (2000b). Genetic engineer- ing and breeding of walnuts for control of aflatoxin. Mycopathologia 115:103. Dien, B. S., Bothast, R. J., lien, L. B., Barrios, L. B., Eckhoff, S. R. (2002). Fate of Bt protein and influence of corn hybrid on ethanol production. Cereal Chem. 79:582-585. Dowd, P. F. (1992a). Insect interactions with mycotoxin-producing fungi and their hosts. In: Bhatnagar, D., Lillehoj, E. B., Arora, D. K., eds. Handbook of Applied Mycology Vol. 5: Mycotoxins in Ecological Systems. New York: Marcel Dekker, pp. 137-155. Dowd, P. F. (1992b). Insect fungal symbionts: a promising source of detoxifying enzymes. J. Ind. Microbiol. 9:149-161. Dowd, P. F. (1994a). Examination of an Aspergillusfiavus resistant inbred of maize for cross-resistance to sap beetle vectors. Entomol. Exp. App!. 77:177-180. Dowd, P. F. (1994b). Enhanced maize (Zea mays L.) pericarp browning: associations with insect resistance and involvement of oxidizing enzymes. J. Chem. Ecol. 20:2777-2803. Dowd, P. F. (1998). Involvement of in the establishment of mycotoxigenic fungi under field conditions. In: Sinha, K. K., Bhatnagar, D., eds. Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food Safety. New York: Marcel Dekker, pp. 307-350. Dowd, P. F. (1999). Relative inhibition of insect phenoloxidase by cyclic fungal metabolites from insect and plant pathogens. Nat. Toxins 7:337- 341. Dowd, P. F. (2000a). Indirect reduction of ear molds and associated myco- toxins in Bacillus thuringiensis corn under controlled and open field conditions: utility and limitations. J. Econ. Entomol. 93:1669-1679. Dowd, P. F. (2000b). Dusky sap beetles (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae) and other kernel damaging insects in Bt and non-Bt sweet corn in Illinois. J. Econ. Entomol. 93:1714-1720. Dowd, P. F. (2001 a). Biotic and abiotic factors limiting efficacy of Bt corn in indirectly reducing mycotoxin levels in commercial fields. J. Econ. Entoinol. 94:1067-1074. Dowd, P. F. (2001b). An integrated management plan for mycotoxins in midwest corn. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Corn Dry Milling Conference. Peoria. IL, May 31—June 1, 2002; Blair, J. A., Wicklow, D. T., eds. North American Millers Federation, Washington, D.C., p. 16. Dowd, P. F. (2002a). Antiinsectan compounds derived from microorganisms. In: Koul, 0., Dhaliwal, G. S., eds. Microbial Biopesticides. New York: Taylor and Francis, pp. 13-115. MARCEL DEKXER, INC. • 270 MADISON AVENUE • NEW YORK, NY 10016

02002 Marcel Dekker, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be used or reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Marcel Dekker, Inc.

Insect Management and Mycotoxins 345

Dowd, P. F. (2002b). A functional approach to more effective multigenic host plant pest resistance. Mycopathologia 155:46. Dowd, P. F., Bartelt, R. J. (1991). Host-derived volatiles as attractants and pheromone synergists for the driedfruit beetles Carpophilus hemip- terus. J. Chem. Ecol. 17:285-308. Dowd, P. F., Lagrimini, L. M. (1997). Examination of different tobacco (Nicotiana spp.) types under- and overproducing tobacco anionic peroxidase for their leaf resistance to Helicoverpa zea. J. Chem. Ecol. 23:2357-2370. Dowd, P. F., White, D. G. (2002). Corn earworm Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) and other insect associated resistance in the maize inbred Tex6. J. Econ. Entornol. 95:628-634. Dowd, P. F., Vega, F. E., Nelsen, T. C., Richard, J. L. (1998a). Dusky sap beetle mediated dispersal of Bacillus subtilis to inhibit Aspergillus flavus and aflatoxin production in maize Zea mays L. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 8:221-235. Dowd, P. F., Behie, R. W., McGuire, M. R., Nelsen, T. C., Shasha, B. S., Simmons, F. W., Vega, F. E. (1998b). Adherent malathion flour granules as an environmentally selective control for chewing insect pests of dent corn ears: insect control. J. Econ. Entomol. 91:1058- 1066. Dowd, P. F., Lagrimini, L. M., Nelsen, T. C. (1998c). Relative resistance of transgenic tomato tissues expressing high levels of tobacco anionic peroxidase to different insect species. Nat. Toxins 6:241-249. Dowd, P. F., Lagrimini, L. M., Herms, D. A. (1998d). Differential leaf resistance to insects of transgenic sweetgum (Liquidambar siyraczflua) expressing tobacco anionic peroxidase. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 54:712- 720. Dowd, P. F., Mehta, A. D., Boston, R. S. (1998e). Relative toxicity of the maize endosperm ribosome-inactivating protein to insects. J. Agric. Food Chem. 46:3775-3779. Dowd, P. F., Bennett, G. A., McGuire, M. R., Nelsen, T. C., Shasha, B. S., Simmons, F. W. (1999). Adherent malathion flour granules as an environmentally selective control for chewing insect pests of dent corn ears: indirect reduction in mycotoxigenic ear molds. J. Econ. Entomol. 92:68-75. Dowd, P. F., Pingel, R. L., Ruhl, D., Shasha, B. S., Behle, R. W., Penland, D. R., McGuire, M. R., Faron, E. J. II (2000a). Multiacreage evaluation of aerially applied adherent malathion granules for selective insect control and indirect reduction of mycotoxigenic fungi in specialty corn. J. Econ. Entomol. 93:1424-1428. Dowd, P. F., Barnett, J., Bartelt, R. J., Beck, J., Berhow, M. A., Boston, R. S., MARCEL DEKKER, INC. .270 MADISON AVENUE • NEW YORK, NY 10016 02002 Marcel Dekker, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be used or reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Marcel Dekker, Inc.

346 Dowd

Duvick, J. P., Lagrimini, L. M., Larson, R. A., Molid, G., Muhitch, M. J., White, D. G. (2000b). Insect management for reduction of mycotoxins in midwest corn—FY 2000 results. In: Proceedings of the Aflatoxin/Fumoni sin Workshop 2000. Yosemite, CA, Oct 25-27, 2000; Robens, J. F., Cary, J. W., Campbell, B. C., eds. U.S.D.A, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville. MD, pp. 57-59. Dowd, P. F., Barnett, J., Bartelt, R. J., Beck, J. J., Berhow, M. A., Duvick, J. P., Kendra, D. A., Molid, G., White, D. G. (2002). Insect management for reduction of mycotoxins in midwest corn—FY 2002 report. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Fungal Genomics, 3rd Fumonisin Elimination and 15th Aflatoxin Elimination Workshop. San Antonio, TX, Oct 23- 25, 2002; Robens, J. F., Brown, R. L., eds. U.S.D.A., Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, pp. 117-118. Folmer, J. D., Grant, R. J., Milton, C. 1., Beck, J. (2000). Utilization of Bt corn residues by grazing beef steers and Bt corn silage and grain by growing beef cattle and lactating dairy cows. J. Anim. Sci. 80:1352- 136 1. Ganassi, S., Moretti, A., Stornelli, C., Fratello, B., Bonvicini-Pagliai, A. M., Logrieco, A., Sabatini, M. A. (2001). Effect of Fusarium, Paecilo- myces, and Trichoderma formulations against aphid Schizaphis graminum. Mycopathologia 151:131-138. Gatch, E. W., Munkvold, G. P. (2002). Fungal species composition in maize stalks in relation to European corn borer injury and transgenic insect protection. Plant Dis. 86:1156-1162. Gatch, E. W., Helimich, R. L., Munkvold, G. P. (2002). A comparison of maize stalk rot occurrence in Bt and non-Bt hybrids. Plant Dis. 86:1149-1155. Gatehouse, J. A., Gatehouse, A. M.R. (2000). Genetic engineering of plants for insect resistance. In: Rechcigl, J. E., Rechcigl, N. A., eds. Biological Biotechnological Control of Insect of Pests. Boca Raton: Lewis Publ, pp. 211-241. Guo, B. Z., Zhang, Z. J., Li, R. G., Widstrom, N. W., Snook, M. E., Lynch, R. E., Plaisted, D. (2001a). Restriction fragment length polymorphism markers associated with silk maysin, antibiosis to corn earworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae, in a dent and sweet corn cross. J. Econ. Entomol. 94:564-571. Guo, B. Z., Zhang, Z. J., Button, A., Widstrom, N. W., Snook, M. E., Lynch, R. E., Plaisted, D. (2001b). Quantitative effects of loci p1 and al on the concentrations of maysin, apimaysin, methoxymaysin and chlorogenic acid in maize silk tissue. MGCN 75:64-66. Hammond, B., Campbell, K., Pilcher, C., Degooyer, T., Robinson, A., Rice, L., Pietri, A., Piva, G., Melcion, D., Cahagnier, B. (2002). JJJ MARCEL DEKXER INC • 270 MADISON AVENUE . NEW YORK, NY 10016 02002 Marcel Dekker, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be used or reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Marcel Dekker, Inc.

Insect Management and Mycotoxins 347

Reduction of fungal and fumonisin levels in Bt. corn. Mycopatho- logia 155:22. Lew, H., Adler, A., Edinger, W. (1991). Moniliformin and the European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis). Mycotoxin Res. 7:71-76. Light, D. M., Knight, A. L., Buttery, R. G., Henrick, C. A., Rajapaska, D., Reynolds, K. M., Merrill, G., Roitman, J., Dickens, J. C., Lingren, W., Campbell, B. C. (2001). Ethyl (2E,4Z)-2,4-decadienoate: a pear-derived kairomone with pheromonal potency that attracts both sexes of the codling moth, Cycia pomonella (L). Naturwissenschaften 88:333- 338. Long. K., Ghazali, H. M., Ariff, A., Man, Y. C., Bucke, C. (1998). Substrate preference of mycelium-bound lipase from a strain of Aspergillus flavus link. Biotechnol. Lett. 20:369-372. Maupin, L. M., Clements, M. J., Walker, S. L., White, D. G. (2002). Effect of CryIA(b) on Aspergillus ear rot and aflatoxin production in commercial corn hybrids. Mycopathologia 155:106. McMullen, M. D., Simcox, K. E. (1995). Genomic organization of disease and insect resistance genes in maize. Mo!. Plant-Microb. Interact. 8:811-815. Munkvold, G. P., McGee, D. C., Carlton, W. M. (1997). Importance of different pathways for maize kernel infection by Fusarium moni!i- forme. Phytopatho!ogy 87:209-217. Munkvold, G. P., Hellmich, R. L., Rice, L. G. (1999). Comparison of fumonisin concentrations in kernels of transgenic Bt maize hybrids and non-transgenic hybrids. Plant Dis. 83:130-138. Munkvold, G. P., Hellmich, R. L., Biggerstaff, C. M. (2000). Interactions among Fusariwn vertici!lioides, insect pests, and Aspergil!us flavus in transgenic and conventional maize hybrids. In: Proceedings of the Aflatoxin/Fumomsin Workshop 2000. Yosemite, CA, Oct 25-27; Robens, J. F., Cary, J. W., Campbell, B. C., eds. U.S.D.A, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, 2p. 142. Nielsen, K., Payne, G. A., Boston, R. S. (2002). Maize ribosome-inactivating protein inhibits normal development of Aspergil!us nidulans and Aspergi!lusflavus 14:164-172. Odvody, G. N., Chilcutt, C. F. (2002). Aflatoxin and insect response in south Texas of near-isogenic corn hybrids with Cry lAb and Cry2Ab events. Mycopathologia 155:107. Ozias-Akins, P., Yang, H., Roberson, E., Akasaka, Y., Lynch, R. (2000). Genetic engineering of peanut for reduction of aflatoxin contamination. In: Proceedings of the Aflatoxin/Fumonisin Workshop 2000. Yosemite, CA, Oct 25-27, 2000; Robens, J. F., Cary, J. W., Campbell, B. C., eds. U.S.D.A, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville. MD, p. 106. - MARCEL DEKKER, INC. • 270 MADISON AVENUE NEW YORK, NY 10016

02002 Marcel Dekker, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be used or reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Marcel Dekker, Inc.

348 Dowd

Ozias-Akins, P., Yang, H., Perry, E., Akasaka, Y., Niu, C., Holbrook, C., Lynch, R. (2002). Transgenic peanut for preharvest aflatoxin reduction. Mycopathologia 115:98. Penchan, T., Jiang, B., Steckler, D., Ye, L., Lin, L., Luthe, D. S., Williams, W. P. (1999). Characterization of three distinct cDNA clones encoding cysteine proteinases from maize (Zea mays L.) callus. Plant Mo!. Biol. 40:111-119. Penchan, T., Ye, L., Chang, Y. M., Mitra, A., Lin, L., Davis, F. M., Williams, W. P., Luthe, D. S. (2000). A unique 33-kD cysteine proteinase accu- mulates in response to larval feeding in maize genotypes resistant to fall armyworm and other Lepidoptera. Plant Cell 12:1031-1040. Penchan, T., Cohen, A., Williams, W. P., Luthe, D. S. (2002). Insect feeding metabolizes a unique plant defense protease that disrupts the peritro- phic matrix of caterpillar. Proc. Nat!. Acad. Sci. 99:13319-13323. Pietri, A., Piva, G. (2000). Occurrence and control of mycotoxins in maize grown in Italy. In: Food Safety: Current Situation and Perspectives in the European Community. Proceedings of the 6th International Feed Production Conference, Trieste, Italy; Piva, G., Masoero, F., eds. November, pp. 226-236. Privalle, L. S., Estruch, J. J., Wright, M., Hill, M. B., Dowd, P. F., Lagrimini, L. M. Methods for conferring insect resistance to a monocot using a peroxidase coding sequence. US Patent 6,002,068, December 14, 1999. Rodriguez-del-Bosque, L. R., Leos-Martinez, J., Dowd, P. F. (1998). Effect of ear wounding and cultural practices on abundance of Carpophilus freemani (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae) and other microcoleopterans in maize in northeastern Mexico. J. Econ. Entornol. 91:796-801. Schaafsma, A. W., Hooker, D. C., Baute, T. S., fllincic-Tamburic, L. (2002). Effect of Bt-corn hybrids on deoxynivalenol content in grain at harvest. Plant Dis. 86:1123-1126. Schulthess, F., Cardwell, K. F., Gounou, S. (2002). The effect of endophytic Fusarium verticillioides on infestation of two maize varieties by lepi- dopterous stemborers and coleopteran grain feeders. Phytopathology 92:120-128. Sears, M. K., Hellmich, R. L., Stanley-Horn, D. E., Oberhauser, K. S., Pleasants, J. M., Mattila, H. R., Siegfried, B. D., Dively, G. P. (2001). Impact of Bt corn pollen on monarch butterfly populations: a risk assessment. Proc. Nat!. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98:11937-11942. Selitrennikoff, C. P. (2001). Antifungal proteins. Appi. Environ. Microbiol. 67:2883-2894. Setamou, M., Cardwell, K. F., Schuithess, F., Hell, K. (1997). Aspergillus flavus infection and aflatoxin contamination of preharvest maize in Benin. Plant Dis. 81:1323-1327. MARCEL DEKKER, INC. .270 MADISON AVENUE . NEW YORK, NY 10016

02002 Marcel Dekker, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be used or reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Marcel Dekker, Inc.

Insect Management and Mycotoxins 349

Setamou, M., Cardwell, K. F., Schuithess, F., Hell, K. (1998). Effect of insect damage to maize ears, with special reference to Mussidia nigrivenella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) on Aspergillus flavus (Deutero- mycetes: Monoliales) infection and aflatoxin production in maize before harvest in the Republic of Benin. J. Econ. Entomol. 91:433- 438. Smith, M. S., Riley, T. J. (1992). Direct and indirect effects of planting date, irrigation, and corn earworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) damage on aflatoxin production in preharvest field corn. J. Econ. Entomol. 85:998-1006. Sobek, E. A., Munkvold, G. P. (1999). European corn borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) larvae as vectors of Fusarium monil(fonne, causing kernels rot and symptomless infection of maize kernels. J. Econ. Entomol. 92:503-509. St. Leger, R. J., Screen, S. E., Shams-Pirzadeh, B. (2000). Lack of host specialization in Aspergillus flavus. Appi. Environ. Microbiol. 66:320- 324. Tabashnik, B. E., Patin, A. L., Dennehy, T. J., Liu, Y. B., Carriere, Y., Sims, M. A., Antilla, L. (2001). Frequency of resistance to Bacillus thu- ringiensis in field populations of pink bolloworm. Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. 97:12980-12984. Tubijika, K. M., Damann, K. E. (2001). Sources of resistance to aflatoxin production in maize. J. Agric. Food Chem. 49:2652-2656. Vega, F. E., Mercadier, G., Dowd, P. F. (1999). Fungi associated with the coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) (Coleoptera: Sco1ytida). I: qce4ngs of the 18th International Scientific Colloquium, on- Finland, Aug 2-6, 1999; Association Scientifique .Iriternationale du Café, pp. 229-237. Wicklow, D. T., Dowd, P. F., Gloer, J. B. (1994). Antiinsectan effects of Aspergillus metabolites. In: Powell, K. A., Renwick, A., Peberdy, J. F., eds. The Aspergillus. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 93-114. Widstrom, N. W., Lamb, M. C., Williams, R. G. Economic input for an expert management system to minimize risk of aflatoxin contamination of maize. In: Proceedings of the AflatoxinfFumonisin Workshop 2000. Yosemite, CA, Oct 25-27, 2000; Robens, J. F., Cary, J. W., Campbell, B. C., eds. U.S.D.A, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, p. 64. Widstrom, N. W., Lamb, M., Johnson, J. (2002). Corn aflatoxin management system (CAMS): assessing risks and a timeline for completion. Mycopathologia 155:47. Williams, W. P., Davis, F. M., Buckley, P. M., Hedin, P. A., Baker, G. T., Luthe, D. S. (1998). Factors associated with resistance to fall MARCEL DEKKER, LNc. • 270 MADISON AvaruE • NEW YORK, NY 10016

02002 Marcel Dekker, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be used or reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Marcel Dekker, Inc.

350 Dowd

armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and southwestern corn borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in corn at different vegetative stages. J. Econ. Entomol. 91:1471-1480. Williams, W. P., Buckley, P. M., Windham, G. L. (2002). Southwestern corn borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) damage and aflatoxin accumulation in maize. J. Econ. Entomol. 95:1049-1053. Williams, W. P., Windham, G. L., Buckley, P. M., Daves, C. A. (2002b). Aflatoxin accumulation in conventional and transgenic corn hybrids infested with southwestern corn borer. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Fungal Genomics, 3rd Fumonisin Elimination and 14th Aflatoxin Elimination Workshop. San Antonio, TX, Oct 23-25, 2002; Robens, J. F., Brown, R. L., eds. U.S.D.A., Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, p. 109. Wilson, D. M. (1995). Management of mycotoxins in peanut. In: Melouk, H. A., Shokes, F. M., eds. Peanut Health Management. St. Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society, p. 87. Windham, G. L., Williams, W. P., Davis, F. M. (1999). Effects of the southwestern corn borer on Aspergillus flavus kernel infection and aflatoxin accumulation in maize hybrids. Plant Dis. 83:535-540.

Supplied by the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research Peoria, II