Major Problems in the Era of the American Revolution, 1760-1791
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Major Problems in the Era of the American Revolution, 1760-1791 DOCUMENTS AND ESSAYS SECOND EDITION EDITED BY RICHARD D. BROWN UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT HOUGHTON MIFFLIN COMPANY Boston New York 238 Major Problems in the Era ofthe American Revolution Outsiders and Enemies: Native Americans and the Loyalists 239 ",,{;It)Q. o •. ESSAYS divisions in the Ohio country during the revolutionary era. The history of Coshocton .<:t<l(1p-o reveals not only the complex divisiveness of Indian politics and diplomacy but also Professor Gregory Evans Dowd, of the University of Notre Dame, recounts the impact of the intractable difficulties, often anchored stubbornly in the thickening sediments of the Revolutionary War for native Americans of the Ohio region in the first essay. Through Anglo-American hatred, that borderland Indians faced when they looked to the east Dowd's explanation of the interplay of warfare and diplomacy, it becomes apparent that for peace, ... there was only a narrow range of options for the Indians, none of them particularly effective. The treaties of 1763 and 1783 combined to create a half-century or more of instability and ultimate decline for the Indians of the trans-Appalachian region. The second essay, by Pro Accommodath.miI! Coshocton, 1775-1779 fessor Robert M. Calhoon of the University of North Carolina, Greensboro, considers the The Delaware consistently advocated good relations with the United Loyalist dimension of the fighting, which, like the Indian warfare, brought death and de leader~ho struction to large areas. States\\l~.[~Whi~~~s a!!Q..!~.illbuck. They lived near the cluster of Moravian mis sion towns of Schtinbrunn, Gnadenhutten, and Salem. Neither had converted to ,, Cbr.isti.anity, but the most outspoken neutralist, White Eyes, consistently Oj5'i)osed There Was No Winning Strategy for the Indians nativists who threatened the missions. White Eyes had been proposing a Delaware GREGORY EVANS DOWD partnership with Anglo-America since 1773 .... White Eyes had two aims for his people. First, he sought to gain Congress's Only one group of Upper Ohio country Indians would hold out for friendship with recognition of Delaware possession of lands north of the Ohio. Second, he sought the emerging republic for most of the Revolutionary War: the inhabitants of the Anglo-American instruction. He sought both landed autonomy and active eco polyglot cluster of villages surrounding Coshocton. All others had taken arms nomic cooperati.t:>_n u~JLQfwhite teadiefS:>Once achieved, the two ~ against the United States by the fall of 1777. Established as the opening shots of ends would bring Security of title and the benefits, as he saw them, of an economy the Revolution were tired in the East, Coshocton with its environs became a refuge productive of material goods. They would also win back the Christian neophytes, for Indians of the region who sought to stand apart from the widespread pattern or at least provide for their continued place among the Delawares .... of hostility toward the Anglo-American rebels. Although the village leaders, who The revolutionary Americans, even when pressed to keep Indian war parties favored neutrality, were Unami-speaking Delawarcs.- Coshocton also sheltered off their borders, would not ratify any treaty that implied Delaware possession. {, Munsee Dela\V~res_~J?~~~a~!1ees. Coshocton's Shawnees, members of a people They did not wish to offend the still largely neutral Six Nations, on whose spurious j often portrayed as adamantly militant, reveal that forces other than simple tribal or 'r claim to much of the trans-Appalachian west many of the colonial purchases had ethnic loyalty were at work in dividing Indians during the early years of the Amer been made, including, for example, the Kentucky cession disputed by the Shawnees ican republic's expansion. Instead of joining close relatives in battle against the in Dunmore's War. American support for the Six Nation's claims to the Ohio country, United States, these nonmilitant Shawnees had decided to dwell among a Iike against those of the Shawnees and Delawares, hindered attempts by the Shawnee minded faction of De"iawai"es. - .- neutralist Cornstalk and the Delaware neutralist White Eyes to increase support for ~ The movement for pan-Indian unity was cut against such factions. It cannot be their peaceful policies. IfWhite Eyes' hopes for American recognition of Delaware fully understood without some inquiry into the opinions, policies, and failures of possessions went unsatisfied in the early years of the war, his desire for economic Indians who stood against it. The Shawnees and Delawares of Coshocton did just acculturation ran up against even more formidable barriers. that. While north and south of the Ohio River religiously minded nativists joined The neutralist vision of economic and technological transformation unfolds sug supply-minded advocates of accommodation in an alliance with Great Britain, the gestively in a set of documents from the negotiations of the treaty council at Fort Coshocton villagers sought peace with the United States. Alone in the Upper Ohio September 1778. According to the terms of the treaty, negotiated largely by White between 1777 and 1779, they were not alone on the continent; factions among the ,.1'; Eyes, the Delawares of the village of Coshocton and the neutral Mequashake Six Nations, Catawbas, Cherokees, Creeks, Chickasaws, Potawatomis, Piankashaws, Shawnees should "become the same people." In strong opposition to nativist notions and others also sought cooperation, tolerance, and harrnony with the AnglO-American of the separateness of Ang.!Q:AI!l~ricMs and Indians, White Eyes desired that "young I,' settlers. Like the Coshoctons, many of these peopl'eswoiiIatillimately meetmtter men''-o{COshocton~md the United States "may be made acquainted with one another disappointment. & that there may be no distinction between them." The representatives of Congress l'~ , Because of the proximity of Coshocton of Moravian missions, of an active promised to send schoolmasters to the CoshoctQIlS to teachJheiLchildren. The most American frontier garrison at Fort Pitt, of the British garrison at Detroit, and of radical Americai1suggestiori~ never implemented by Congress, guaranteed the Dela Britain's agents operating along Lake Erie, we have good records concerning such wares' possession of all their claimed lands and suggested, audaciously, that the C Ohio Indians still in friendship with the United States might "form a state whereof' the Delaware Nation shall be the head. and have a representation in Congress: Pro Dowd, A Spirited Resistance: The North American Indian Struggle for Unity, 1745-1815, pp. 65-87. vided, nothing in this article to be considered as conclusive until it meets with the © 1992 by Johns Hopkins University Press. approbation of Congress." It is inconceivable that such a proposal was accepted, in 241 240 Major Problems in the Era afthe American Revolution Outsiders and Bnemies: Native Americans and the Loyalists good faith, by even the most broad-minded of the commissioners, but it certainly Counties" would allow an Indian supply train to pass unmolested, "so violent are illustrates the lengths American agents were williQgjo run _"Pj_~ they were the Prejudices against the Indians." Even the Delaware carrot of certain land ces willing to spin in order to achieve Delaware neutrality. sions failed to raise the necessary supplies .... Britain, meanwhile, did its best to keep the other northern Indians in cloth, Neutral Delaware leaders Killbuck and White Eyes were serious enough about J,r peace with the United States to send three of their loved ones-George White Eyes powder, and ball. The British kuew they had the advantage in Indian relations. Gen (White Eyes' eight-year-old son), John Killbuck (Killbuck's sixteen-year-old eral FredeEic:k.Haldimaoo.:wrutc.Major Arrent de Peyster in 1780 that "the Indians ?J son), and Thomas (Killbuck's eighteen-year-old half brother)-deep into Anglo in generm..Jy~h to protract the War."·Added to the danger ofAnglo-American settle rJ America, to Princeton, New Jersey, to live in the home of Indian agent Colonel ment, Indians generally favored the British because "it is impossible they can draw ,/ George Morgan. There they attended the local schools, including the college. resources from the Rebels & they absolutely depend upon us for every Blanket --::--c~----c _ .•- ........»-.----..------- More indicative of his willingness to cooperate with the United States was they are covered with. Game remained scarce, trade was disrupted by war, and (" White Eyes' intention to have an American garrison established near Coshocton to winters in the Ohio country could be fierce. The Indians needed blankets. It was a , protect his people against the rising opposition of his militant Indian neighbors. simple need, but if it could not be met in trade with the Anglo-Americans it had to f The fort was to provide the Coshoctons with "Provisions and Ammunition," as be met somehow. Even for Indians who distrusted militant nativists, who put no well as with protection. This did not mean military alliance. The Delawares were faith in pan-Indianism, B.I.ill§!L~lliW!ies \\I~re one, reasQn to take arms against the , not ready to combine their request for a fort with a pledge to give active support to Anglo-Americans.... They did so particularly in the wake of American raids. In the South, the raids j the Americans, at least not in 1778 .... The American promise to build a fort as both a supply base and a possible de of 1776 had driven the Cherokee nation proper to neutrality, but in the North, cir fensive haven for the Delawares and an American plan for the capture of Detroit cumstances differed, and American raids only increased Indian hostilities. The combined to produce Fort Laurens, an isolated, poorly supplied garrison that failed Senecas suffered from the most serious northern invasions in 1779.