DOCSLIB.ORG

The Importance of the Wadi Daliyeh Manuscripts for the History Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Importance of the Wadi Daliyeh Manuscripts for the History Of religions ArticleArticle TheThe Importance Importance ofof thethe WadiWadi DaliyehDaliyeh Manuscripts Manuscripts for thefor Historythe History of Samaria of Samaria and and the the Samaritans Samaritans Jan Dušek Jan Dušek Protestant Theological Faculty, Charles University, Prague 115 55, Czech Republic; [email protected] Protestant Theological Faculty, Charles University, Prague 115 55, Czech Republic; [email protected] Received:Received: 16 16 December December 2019; 2019; Accepted:Accepted: 20 January 2020; 2020; Published: Published: 29 29 January January 2020 2020 Abstract:Abstract:In In this this article, article, wewe dealdeal withwith the topic of of the the Samaria Samaria papyri papyri from from Wadi Wadi Daliyeh Daliyeh in inthree three mainmain parts parts implied implied by by the the title.title. First, we briefly briefly summarize summarize the the basic basic data data re relatedlated to tothe the manuscripts. manuscripts. Second,Second, we we analyze analyze their their significance significance forfor the history of of Samaria. Samaria. Third, Third, the the last last section section is isdevoted devoted to to thethe meaning meaning of of the the papyri papyri for for thethe historyhistory ofof the Samaritans. Keywords:Keywords:Wadi Wadi Daliyeh; Daliyeh;Samaria; Samaria; PersianPersian period; Samaritans 1.1. Discovery Discovery of of the the Samaria Samaria PapyriPapyri inin Wadi Daliyeh, Their Their Date Date and and Content Content TheThe Samaria Samaria papyri papyri werewere foundfound by the Ta ʿâmirehâmireh Bedouins Bedouins in in the the Mughâret Mughâret Ab Abū uShinjeh¯ Shinjeh cave cave inin Wadi Wadi Daliyeh, Daliyeh, approximately approximately 1414 kmkm northnorth ofof Jericho, in in or or before before 1962. 1962. The The exact exact date date of oftheir their discoverydiscovery is is unknown. unknown. ScholarsScholars inin Jerusalem, Yusef Yusef Saad, Saad, the the curator curator of of the the Palestine Palestine Archaeological Archaeological Museum,Museum, Roland Roland de de Vaux Vaux from from the theÉ coleÉcole Biblique Biblique et et arch archéologiqueéologique française française in inJerusalem, Jerusalem, andand PaulPaul W. Lapp,W. Lapp, at that at time that directortime director of the of American the American School School of Oriental of Oriental Research Research in Jerusalem in Jerusalem (W. F. Albright(W. F. InstituteAlbright of Institute Oriental of Research), Oriental Research), were informed were in offormed their existence of their existence by the famous by the dealer famous in dealer antiquities in Khalilantiquities Iskander Khalil Shahin, Iskander known Shahin, under known the name under Kando, the name in April Kando, 1962. in April A set 1962. of objects—manuscripts, A set of objects— bullae,manuscripts, and coins—coming bullae, and coins—coming from the Bedouins’ from the excavations Bedouins’ in excavations the Wadi Daliyeh in the Wadi cave ofDaliyeh Mugh caveâret Abof u¯ ShinjehMughâret were Ab subsequentlyū Shinjeh were purchased subsequently for the purchased Palestine Archaeological for the Palestine Museum Archaeological in Jerusalem Museum (today in the Jerusalem (today the Rockefeller Museum) on 19 November 1962 and 7 August 1963. The Rockefeller Museum) on 19 November 1962 and 7 August 1963. The manuscripts were edited twice. manuscripts were edited twice. The first edition was prepared by Douglas M. Gropp (Gropp et al. The first edition was prepared by Douglas M. Gropp (Gropp et al. 2001) and the second by the author of 2001) and the second by the author of this article (Dušek 2007). A few other inscribed fragments were this article (Dušek 2007). A few other inscribed fragments were later purchased for the private collection later purchased for the private collection of Martin Schøyen. The script on the new papyri fragments of Martin Schøyen. The script on the new papyri fragments is the same as that used in the main corpus. is the same as that used in the main corpus. Some of the fragments seem to contain parts of proper Some of the fragments seem to contain parts of proper names and other words attested in the main names and other words attested in the main corpus of the Samaria papyri, so it is possible that the corpus of the Samaria papyri, so it is possible that the fragments from the Schøyen collection originally fragments from the Schøyen collection originally belonged to this set of papyri (Dušek 2016). belongedThe to legal this documents, set of papyri today (Dušek known 2016 as). the Wadi Daliyeh Samaria Papyri (WDSP), were probably depositedThe legal in the documents, Mughâret today Abū Shinjeh known cave as the in Wadi Wadi Daliyeh Daliyeh Samariain the context Papyri of (WDSP),the events were in Samaria probably depositedduring and in theafter Mugh the âcampaignret Abu¯ Shinjeh of Alexander cave in the Wadi Great Daliyeh in Egypt in the in context332/31 ofBCE. the Alexander, events in Samaria after duringhaving and conquered after the the campaign city of Tyre of Alexander in July 332 the BC GreatE and inappointed Egypt in Andromachus 332/31 BCE. Alexander, as governor after of Syria, having conqueredcontinued the southward city of Tyre to in Egypt. July 332 During BCE andhis appointedstay in Egypt, Andromachus the inhabitants as governor of the ofcity Syria, of Samaria continued southwardrevolted against to Egypt. Andromachus During his and stay burned in Egypt, him the alive. inhabitants When Alexander of the city received of Samaria this revolted bad news, against he Andromachusreturned to Samaria and burned and punished him alive. the When rebels Alexander (Quintus Curtius, received Historiae this bad IV, news, VIII, he 9–11). returned The owner to Samaria or andowners punished of the the Samaria rebels papyri (Quintus were Curtius, probablyHistoriae amongIV, the VIII, people 9–11). from The the owner city of or Samaria owners who of the tried Samaria to papyriescape were from probably Alexander’s among army, the and people who, from with the only city their of Samariamost valuable who tried and transportable to escape from belongings, Alexander’s army,wanted and to who, hide with in the only Mughâret their most Ab valuableū Shinjeh and cave transportable in Wadi Daliyeh. belongings,1 Nevertheless, wanted to they hide were in the Mughprobablyâret Ab foundu¯ Shinjeh by Alexander’s cave in Wadi army Daliyeh. and they1 Nevertheless, may have been they suffocated were probably by a fire found lit by by Alexander’s Alexander’s armysoldiers and at they the may entrance have of been the suffocatedcave (Cross by 1974, a fire pp. lit 17 by– Alexander’s18). soldiers at the entrance of the cave (Cross 1974 , pp. 17–18). 1 See the list of the finds from the Persian period in Mughâret Abū Shinjeh in Lapp and Lapp (1974, pp. 13–14). Religions 2020, 11, 63; doi:10.3390/rel11020063 www.mdpi.com/journal/religions 1 See the list of the finds from the Persian period in Mughâret Abu¯ Shinjeh in Lapp and Lapp(1974, pp. 13–14). Religions 2020, 11, 63; doi:10.3390/rel11020063 www.mdpi.com/journal/religions Religions 2020, 11, 63 2 of 12 in the (שמריN בירתא! קריתא!) The Samaria papyri were written in the city or the fortress of Samaria n most of them during the second third of the 4th century BCE, in the ,(שמריN מדינתא!) province of Samaria last decades of the Persian period before Alexander’s conquest of Palestine (Dušek 2007, pp. 441–45). The oldest document that can be explicitly dated, WDSP 22, was probably written between 375 and 365 BCE. The latest document containing a dating formula, WDSP 1, was concluded on 19 March 335 BCE (= the 20th of Adar, year 2 (of Arses/Artaxerxes IV), beginning of the reign of Darius III).2 Another fragment, WDSP 36 frg. 1, perhaps originally belonged to a document that could even have been written after WDSP 1, between 335 and 332 BCE (Dušek 2007, p. 423). None of the documents are preserved in entirety. The best-preserved deed, WDSP 1, seems to represent approximately only half of the original document. Most of the Samaria papyri are deeds of sale of slaves, single male or female slaves, or groups of slaves.3 Some documents concern other transactions regarding slaves,4 a loan (WDSP 17), a lawsuit (WDSP 11 verso), and other types of contracts. Only papyrus strips remain of some of the documents. WDSP 28—WDSP 37 consist of groups of papyrus fragments. Bullae, some of them still attached to the manuscripts, were discovered along with the Samaria papyri. The bullae purchased for the Palestine Archaeological Museum were published by Mary Joan Winn Leith (Leith 1997). In 1992, the original corpus of the Wadi Daliyeh bullae of the Palestine Archaeological Museum was enlarged by the publication of approximately forty additional bullae, purchased by R. Hecht and published by Ephraim Stern (Stern 1992, 2002).5 Most of the bullae from Wadi Daliyeh bear depictions of various Persian/Near Eastern or Greek motifs such as nude youths and warriors, male and female figures, Dionysian subjects, animals (single or flanking), the Persian Hero, and others.6 Similar motifs were also used on some of the Samarian coins minted during the 4th century BCE (Leith 1997, pp. 29–30; 2000). The motifs depicted on the Samarian bullae and coins are different from those used in Judah during the Persian period. The Samarian imagery from the Persian period reflects the history and the culture of the region, which was different from that of Judah,7 and indicates the existence of cultural continuity between the Iron Age Israel and the Persian province of Samaria (Leith 2014). 2. The Wadi Daliyeh Manuscripts and Samaria in the Late Persian Period The Samaria papyri from Wadi Daliyeh provide us with precious information regarding some of the inhabitants of Samaria, including some of its officials. The deeds also contain information on length and weighing measures used in the province during the 4th century BCE, before Alexander.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Your Record of 2019 Election Results
    Produced by the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) Issue No 1: 2020 Your Record of 2019 Election Results These results are based on a spreadsheet received from the Electoral Commission of Namibia (ECN) on February 20 2020 with the exception that a mistake made by the ECN concerning the Windhoek Rural constituency result for the Presidential election has been corrected. The mistake, in which the votes for Independent candidate and the UDF candidate had been transposed, was spotted by the IPPR and has been acknowledged by the ECN. National Assembly Results REGION & Constituency Registered APP CDV CoD LPM NDP NEFF NPF NUDO PDM RDP RP SWANU SWAPO UDF WRP Total Votes 2019 2014 Voters Cast Turnout Turnout ZAMBEZI 45303 Judea Lyaboloma 3122 12 12 8 3 47 4 1 5 169 12 9 3 1150 5 2 1442 46.19 62.86 Kabbe North 3782 35 20 5 20 30 8 2 5 224 17 8 8 1780 14 88 2264 59.86 73.17 Kabbe South 3662 16 10 6 13 20 3 3 3 97 9 6 1 1656 4 4 1851 50.55 72.47 Katima Mulilo Rural 6351 67 26 12 25 62 12 4 6 304 26 8 7 2474 16 3 3052 48.06 84.78 Katima Mulilo Urban 13226 94 18 24 83 404 23 10 18 1410 70 42 23 5443 30 12 7704 58.25 58.55 Kongola 5198 67 35 17 21 125 10 5 5 310 32 40 17 1694 22 5 2405 46.27 65.37 Linyanti 3936 22 17 7 4 150 4 2 5 118 84 4 4 1214 12 0 1647 41.84 70.61 Sibbinda 6026 27 27 17 13 154 9 2 6 563 42 11 9 1856 27 5 2768 45.93 55.23 23133 51.06 ERONGO 113633 Arandis 7894 74 27 21 399 37 159 6 60 1329 61 326 8 2330 484 20 5341 67.66 74.97 Daures 7499 39 29 2 87 11 13 12 334 482 43 20 80 1424 1010 18 3604 54.86 61.7 Karibib 9337 78 103
    [Show full text]
  • The Roman Province of Judea: a Historical Overview
    BYU Studies Quarterly Volume 36 Issue 3 Article 23 7-1-1996 The Roman Province of Judea: A Historical Overview John F. Hall Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byusq Part of the Mormon Studies Commons, and the Religious Education Commons Recommended Citation Hall, John F. (1996) "The Roman Province of Judea: A Historical Overview," BYU Studies Quarterly: Vol. 36 : Iss. 3 , Article 23. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byusq/vol36/iss3/23 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in BYU Studies Quarterly by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hall: The Roman Province of Judea: A Historical Overview p d tffieffiAinelixnealxAIX romansixulalealliki glnfin ns i u1uaihiihlanilni judeatairstfsuuctfa Published by BYU ScholarsArchive, 1996 1 BYU Studies Quarterly, Vol. 36, Iss. 3 [1996], Art. 23 the roman province judeaofiudeaofofjudea A historical overview john E hall the comingcoining of rome to judea romes acquisition ofofjudeajudea and subsequent involvement in the affairs of that long troubled area came about in largely indirect fashion for centuries judea had been under the control of the hel- lenilenisticstic greek monarchy centered in syria and known as the seleu- cid empire one of the successor states to the far greater empire of alexander the great who conquered the vast reaches of the persian empire toward the end of the fourth century
    [Show full text]
  • Worthy of Another Look: the Great Isaiah Scroll and the Book of Mormon
    Journal of Book of Mormon Studies Volume 20 Number 2 Article 7 2011 Worthy of Another Look: The Great Isaiah Scroll and the Book of Mormon Donald W. Perry Stephen D. Ricks Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/jbms BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Perry, Donald W. and Ricks, Stephen D. (2011) "Worthy of Another Look: The Great Isaiah Scroll and the Book of Mormon," Journal of Book of Mormon Studies: Vol. 20 : No. 2 , Article 7. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/jbms/vol20/iss2/7 This Feature Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Book of Mormon Studies by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Title Worthy of Another Look: The Great Isaiah Scroll and the Book of Mormon Author(s) Donald W. Parry and Stephen D. Ricks Reference Journal of the Book of Mormon and Other Restoration Scripture 20/2 (2011): 78–80. ISSN 1948-7487 (print), 2167-7565 (online) Abstract Numerous differences exist between the Isaiah pas- sages in the Book of Mormon and the corresponding passages in the King James Version of the Bible. The Great Isaiah Scroll supports several of these differences found in the Book of Mormon. Five parallel passages in the Isaiah scroll, the Book of Mormon, and the King James Version of the Bible are compared to illus- trate the Book of Mormon’s agreement with the Isaiah scroll. WORTHY OF ANOTHER LOOK THE GREAT ISAIAH SCROLL AND THE BOOK OF MORMON DONALD W.
    [Show full text]
  • Property Tax Arrears List Department of Finance, Government of Nunavut ᓇᖕᒥᓂᖁᑎᒋᔭᐅᔪᒥᒃ ᑖᒃᓰᔭᖅᑕᐅᓂᖅ ᐊᑭᓕᒃᓴᑐᖃᒃᑯᑦ ᑎᑎᕋᖅᓯᒪᔪᑦ 2Nd Floor Parnaivik Building, 924 Mivvik Street P.O
    Taxation and Insurance Property Tax Arrears List Department of Finance, Government of Nunavut ᓇᖕᒥᓂᖁᑎᒋᔭᐅᔪᒥᒃ ᑖᒃᓰᔭᖅᑕᐅᓂᖅ ᐊᑭᓕᒃᓴᑐᖃᒃᑯᑦ ᑎᑎᕋᖅᓯᒪᔪᑦ 2nd floor Parnaivik Building, 924 Mivvik Street P.O. Box 2260, Iqaluit, Nunavut, X0A 0H0 Liste des arriérés d’impôt foncier 1 (800) 316-3324 Piqutini Taaksiinni Atugaqaqnikkut Titiraqhimayut [email protected] June 30, 2015 / ᔫᓂ 30, 2015-ᒥᑦ / 30 juin, 2015 Nunallaaq Roll Nanminiqaqtuq Atukkat Akiliqtauyukhat Titiqqiqivia ᓄᓇᓕᒃ ᐃᒡᓗᑯᑖᖅ ᓇᖕᒥᓂᖃᖅᑎ ᐊᑭᓕᒃᓴᑐᖃᑦ ᑎᑎᕋᕐᑯᕕᐊ ᑐᕌᕈᑕ Collectivité Rôle Propriétaire Arriérés dus Adresse postale Community Roll Owner Arrears Owing Mailing Address Arctic Bay / ᐃᒃᐱᐊᕐᔪᒃᒥ 4703017900 121702 Canada Inc. $87.17 P.O. Box 670, Iqaluit, NU X0A 0H0 Arctic Bay / ᐃᒃᐱᐊᕐᔪᒃᒥ 4703009700 Akpalialuk, Josia & Hughes, Connie $1,944.60 P.O. Box 11, Arctic Bay, NU X0A 0A0 Arctic Bay / ᐃᒃᐱᐊᕐᔪᒃᒥ 4703008900 Aola, Daniel & Hannah $396.12 P.O. Box 91, Arctic Bay, NU X0A 0A0 Arctic Bay / ᐃᒃᐱᐊᕐᔪᒃᒥ 4703003900 Aqsuksivik Society $1,026.47 P.O. Box 118, Arctic Bay, NU X0A 0A0 Arctic Bay / ᐃᒃᐱᐊᕐᔪᒃᒥ 4703023700 Arqvartuuq Services Limited $1,622.45 P.O. Box 130, Arctic Bay, NU X0A 0A0 Arctic Bay / ᐃᒃᐱᐊᕐᔪᒃᒥ 4703000800 Arqvartuuq Services Limited $345.40 P.O. Box 130, Arctic Bay, NU X0A 0A0 Arctic Bay / ᐃᒃᐱᐊᕐᔪᒃᒥ 4703028800 Arqvartuuq Services Limited $216.56 P.O. Box 130, Arctic Bay, NU X0A 0A0 Arctic Bay / ᐃᒃᐱᐊᕐᔪᒃᒥ 4703040800 Arvartuuq Services Ltd. $2,146.41 P.O. Box 130, Arctic Bay, NU X0A 0A0 Arctic Bay / ᐃᒃᐱᐊᕐᔪᒃᒥ 4703009900 Barnabas, Levi & Susanna $2,408.44 P.O. Box 22, Arctic Bay, NU X0A 0A0 Arctic Bay / ᐃᒃᐱᐊᕐᔪᒃᒥ 4703009300 Barnabas, Olayuk & Lydia $2,395.66 P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dead Sea Scrolls: a Biography Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS: A BIOGRAPHY PDF, EPUB, EBOOK John J. Collins | 288 pages | 08 Nov 2012 | Princeton University Press | 9780691143675 | English | New Jersey, United States The Dead Sea Scrolls: A Biography PDF Book It presents the story of the scrolls from several perspectives - from the people of Qumran, from those second temple Israelites living in Jerusalem, from the early Christians, and what it means today. The historian Josephus relates the division of the Jews of the Second Temple period into three orders: the Sadducees , the Pharisees , and the Essenes. Currently, he is completing a comprehensive, multi-volume study on the archaeology of Qumran. DSSEL covers only the non-biblical Qumran texts based on a formal understanding of what constitutes a biblical text. Enter email address. And he unravels the impassioned disputes surrounding the scrolls and Christianity. The scrolls include the oldest biblical manuscripts ever found. Also recovered were archeological artifacts that confirmed the scroll dates suggested by paleographic study. His heirs sponsored construction of the Shrine of the Book in Jerusalem's Israel Museum, in which these unique manuscripts are exhibited to the public. In the first of the Dead Sea Scroll discoveries was made near the site of Qumran, at the northern end of the Dead Sea. For example, the species of animal from which the scrolls were fashioned — sheep or cow — was identified by comparing sections of the mitochondrial DNA found in the cells of the parchment skin to that of more than 10 species of animals until a match was found. Noam Mizrahi from the department of biblical studies, in collaboration with Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 the Assyrian Empire, the Conquest of Israel, and the Colonization of Judah 37 I
    ISRAEL AND EMPIRE ii ISRAEL AND EMPIRE A Postcolonial History of Israel and Early Judaism Leo G. Perdue and Warren Carter Edited by Coleman A. Baker LONDON • NEW DELHI • NEW YORK • SYDNEY 1 Bloomsbury T&T Clark An imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc Imprint previously known as T&T Clark 50 Bedford Square 1385 Broadway London New York WC1B 3DP NY 10018 UK USA www.bloomsbury.com Bloomsbury, T&T Clark and the Diana logo are trademarks of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc First published 2015 © Leo G. Perdue, Warren Carter and Coleman A. Baker, 2015 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publishers. Leo G. Perdue, Warren Carter and Coleman A. Baker have asserted their rights under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as Authors of this work. No responsibility for loss caused to any individual or organization acting on or refraining from action as a result of the material in this publication can be accepted by Bloomsbury or the authors. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN: HB: 978-0-56705-409-8 PB: 978-0-56724-328-7 ePDF: 978-0-56728-051-0 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Typeset by Forthcoming Publications (www.forthpub.com) 1 Contents Abbreviations vii Preface ix Introduction: Empires, Colonies, and Postcolonial Interpretation 1 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Reassessing the Judean Desert Caves: Libraries, Archives, Genizas and Hiding Places
    Bulletin of the Anglo-Israel Archaeological Society 2007 Volume 25 Reassessing the Judean Desert Caves: Libraries, Archives, Genizas and Hiding Places STEPHEN PFANN In December 1952, five years after the discovery of Qumran cave 1, Roland de Vaux connected its manuscript remains to the nearby site of Khirbet Qumran when he found one of the unique cylindrical jars, typical of cave 1Q, embedded in the floor of the site. The power of this suggestion was such that, from that point on, as each successive Judean Desert cave containing first-century scrolls was discovered, they, too, were assumed to have originated from the site of Qumran. Even the scrolls discovered at Masada were thought to have arrived there by the hands of Essene refugees. Other researchers have since proposed that certain teachings within the scrolls of Qumran’s caves provide evidence for a sect that does not match that of the Essenes described by first-century writers such as Josephus, Philo and Pliny. These researchers prefer to call this group ‘the Qumran Community’, ‘the Covenanters’, ‘the Yahad ’ or simply ‘sectarians’. The problem is that no single title sufficiently covers the doctrines presented in the scrolls, primarily since there is a clear diversity in doctrine among these scrolls.1 In this article, I would like to present a challenge to this monolithic approach to the understanding of the caves and their scroll collections. This reassessment will be based on a close examination of the material culture of the caves (including ceramics and fabrics) and the palaeographic dating of the scroll collections in individual caves.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Conquests of Canaan
    ÅA Wars in the Middle East are almost an every day part of Eero Junkkaala:of Three Canaan Conquests our lives, and undeniably the history of war in this area is very long indeed. This study examines three such wars, all of which were directed against the Land of Canaan. Two campaigns were conducted by Egyptian Pharaohs and one by the Israelites. The question considered being Eero Junkkaala whether or not these wars really took place. This study gives one methodological viewpoint to answer this ques- tion. The author studies the archaeology of all the geo- Three Conquests of Canaan graphical sites mentioned in the lists of Thutmosis III and A Comparative Study of Two Egyptian Military Campaigns and Shishak and compares them with the cities mentioned in Joshua 10-12 in the Light of Recent Archaeological Evidence the Conquest stories in the Book of Joshua. Altogether 116 sites were studied, and the com- parison between the texts and the archaeological results offered a possibility of establishing whether the cities mentioned, in the sources in question, were inhabited, and, furthermore, might have been destroyed during the time of the Pharaohs and the biblical settlement pe- riod. Despite the nature of the two written sources being so very different it was possible to make a comparative study. This study gives a fresh view on the fierce discus- sion concerning the emergence of the Israelites. It also challenges both Egyptological and biblical studies to use the written texts and the archaeological material togeth- er so that they are not so separated from each other, as is often the case.
    [Show full text]
  • Machine Transliteration of Proper Names Between English and Persian
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by RMIT Research Repository Machine Transliteration of Proper Names between English and Persian A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Sarvnaz Karimi BEng. (Hons.), MSc. School of Computer Science and Information Technology, Science, Engineering, and Technology Portfolio, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. March, 2008 Declaration I certify that except where due acknowledgement has been made, the work is that of the author alone; the work has not been submitted previously, in whole or in part, to qualify for any other academic award; the content of the thesis is the result of work which has been carried out since the official commencement date of the approved research program; and, any editorial work, paid or unpaid, carried out by a third party is acknowledged. Sarvnaz Karimi School of Computer Science and Information Technology RMIT University March, 2008 ii Acknowledgements During my PhD candidature, I have had the privilege to work with great supervisors, Dr Andrew Turpin and Dr Falk Scholer, who offered me their trust and patience. Their assis- tance, advice, and constructive comments and criticism were invaluable to me. I am proud of all the joint work we did during my candidature. To them I owe my deepest gratitude. My gratitude also goes to Dr Ali Moeini, my masters degree supervisor, who had been a never-ending source of encouragement, which led to my pursuit of a PhD degree. Many thanks to all of the volunteers who dedicated their time to construct the bilingual corpora I required for my experiments: Behnaz Abdollahi, Naghmeh Alibeik Zade, Shahrzad Bahiraie, Nahid Bozorgkhou, Azam Jalali, Haleh Jenab, Masoumeh Kargar, Mahshid Mehrtash, Mitra Mirzarezaee, Apameh Pour Bakhshandeh, Sahar Saberi, Sima Tarashion, my dear sis- ters Nastaran and Nazgol, and many others.
    [Show full text]
  • Rotunda ROM Magazine Subject Index V. 1 (1968) – V. 42 (2009)
    Rotunda ROM Magazine Subject Index v. 1 (1968) – v. 42 (2009) 2009.12.02 Adam (Biblical figure)--In art: Hickl-Szabo, H. "Adam and Eve." Rotunda 2:4 (1969): 4-13. Aesthetic movement (Art): Kaellgren, P. "ROM answers." Rotunda 31:1 (1998): 46-47. Afghanistan--Antiquities: Golombek, L. "Memories of Afghanistan: as a student, our writer realized her dream of visiting the exotic lands she had known only through books and slides: thirty-five years later, she recalls the archaeoloigical treasures she explored in a land not yet ruined by tragedy." Rotunda 34:3 (2002): 24-31. Akhenaton, King of Egypt: Redford, D.B. "Heretic Pharoah: the Akhenaten Temple Project." Rotunda 17:3 (1984): 8-15. Kelley, A.L. "Pharoah's temple to the sun: archaeologists unearth the remains of the cult that failed." Rotunda 9:4 (1976): 32-39. Alabaster sculpture: Hickl-Szabo, H. "St. Catherine of Alexandria: memorial to Gerard Brett." Rotunda 3:3 (1970): 36-37. Keeble, K.C. "Medieval English alabasters." Rotunda 38:2 (2005): 14-21. Alahan Manastiri (Turkey): Gough, M. "They carved the stone: the monastery of Alahan." Rotunda 11:2 (1978): 4-13. Albertosaurus: Carr, T.D. "Baby face: ROM Albertosaurus reveals new findings on dinosaur development." Rotunda 34:3 (2002): 5. Alexander, the Great, 356-323 B.C.: Keeble, K.C. "The sincerest form of flattery: 17th-century French etchings of the battles of Alexander the Great." Rotunda 16:1 (1983): 30-35. Easson, A.H. "Macedonian coinage and its Hellenistic successors." Rotunda 15:4 (1982): 29-31. Leipen, N. "The search for Alexander: from the ROM collections." Rotunda 15:4 (1982): 23-28.
    [Show full text]
  • Persian, Farsi, Dari, Tajiki: Language Names and Language Policies
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Department of Anthropology Papers Department of Anthropology 2012 Persian, Farsi, Dari, Tajiki: Language Names and Language Policies Brian Spooner University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/anthro_papers Part of the Anthropological Linguistics and Sociolinguistics Commons, and the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation (OVERRIDE) Spooner, B. (2012). Persian, Farsi, Dari, Tajiki: Language Names and Language Policies. In H. Schiffman (Ed.), Language Policy and Language Conflict in Afghanistan and Its Neighbors: The Changing Politics of Language Choice (pp. 89-117). Leiden, Boston: Brill. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/anthro_papers/91 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Persian, Farsi, Dari, Tajiki: Language Names and Language Policies Abstract Persian is an important language today in a number of countries of west, south and central Asia. But its status in each is different. In Iran its unique status as the only official or national language continueso t be jealously guarded, even though half—probably more—of the population use a different language (mainly Azari/Azeri Turkish) at home, and on the streets, though not in formal public situations, and not in writing. Attempts to broach this exclusive status of Persian in Iran have increased in recent decades, but are still relatively minor. Persian (called tajiki) is also the official language ofajikistan, T but here it shares that status informally with Russian, while in the west of the country Uzbek is also widely used and in the more isolated eastern part of the country other local Iranian languages are now dominant.
    [Show full text]