DOCSLIB.ORG

Under the Direction of Drs. Michael Reiskind and Robert Dunn)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ABSTRACT SPENCE BEAULIEU, MEREDITH RUTH. The Ecology of Dog Heartworm Disease. (Under the direction of Drs. Michael Reiskind and Robert Dunn). Suburban development is rapidly transforming the global landscape. This anthropogenically induced land-use change affects the species around us, including mosquitoes and the pathogens that they transmit. Although the effect of urbanization has been extensively studied for key mosquito species of interest, relatively little research has addressed the effect of urbanization on mosquito species assemblages as a whole. Knowledge of the effects of urbanization on entire mosquito communities is critical, as many vector-borne diseases are transmitted by an assembly of vectors and therefore could be sensitive to community-level alterations after land-use change. Additionally, the effects of vector diversity on the transmission of multi-vectored pathogens has scarcely been explored either empirically or theoretically. In this dissertation, I investigate the effects of suburban development on mosquito assemblages and the subsequent consequences for vector-borne disease transmission using the dog heartworm, Dirofilaria immitis, as a model system. In the first experiment, I used a field study to determine the effects of suburbanization on mosquito diversity and community composition. I found that species diversity declined with neighborhood age, with the oldest suburban areas having species assemblages that are characteristically less diverse than those of undeveloped areas. The community composition differed between habitat types, with the suburban mosquito assemblage being dominated by the invasive Aedes albopictus, the Asian tiger mosquito. In the second experiment, I performed an epidemiological study comparing the within-mosquito heartworm and within-host heartworm prevalence by land-use type. I found that suburban areas had lower levels of heartworm within both the host and the vector than did the undeveloped field sites, with undeveloped wooded sites showing an intermediate pathogen presence. Since the suburban areas were overwhelmingly dominated by Ae. albopictus and had significantly lower heartworm prevalence, I then investigated the vector competence of the local population of Ae. albopictus with the hypothesis that it was a poor vector locally. In the third study, I performed a laboratory experiment testing the D. immitis developmental times, mosquito longevity and fecundity, and the vector efficiency index for Ae. albopictus and a suspected highly competent local vector, Aedes triseriatus. I found that Ae. albopictus is indeed a poor vector of heartworm in Wake County, as evidenced by significant infection-induced mortality and a vector efficiency index more than 4x lower than that of Ae. triseriatus. In the fourth study, I created a single host and multi-vector SIR-type mathematical model of dog heartworm disease. Utilizing the laboratory generated parameters for Ae. albopictus and Ae. triseriatus as well as the field data on the diversity and community composition of suburban and undeveloped areas in Wake County, I compared the model’s basic reproduction number, !", for these empirically driven scenarios. Using the critical value of !" > 1 as a threshold, I validated that Ae. triseriatus is a competent vector of D. immitis, while Ae. albopictus is insufficient to support disease transmission as the sole vector in a natural setting. I also demonstrated that the suburban mosquito assemblage had a notably lower !" than the natural area assemblage, supporting my previous observations on heartworm prevalence by habitat type. To test theoretical predictions about the effect of vector diversity on disease transmission, I then simulated many iterations of models with one, three, five, and ten vector species. While changes in diversity did not significantly affect the average !", variation in !" values decreased as the number of vectors increased. This demonstrates the stabilizing effect of vector diversity for multi-vectored pathogens while also highlighting the importance of species identity and community composition for determining the magnitude of disease transmission. In a final brief chapter, I consider the parasite manipulation hypothesis and its potential implications for vector- borne diseases. © Copyright 2019 by Meredith Ruth Spence Beaulieu All Rights Reserved The Ecology of Dog Heartworm Disease by Meredith Ruth Spence Beaulieu A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of North Carolina State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Entomology Raleigh, North Carolina 2019 APPROVED BY: _______________________________ _______________________________ Dr. Michael Reiskind Dr. Robert Dunn Committee Co-Chair Committee Co-Chair _______________________________ _______________________________ Dr. David Watson Dr. Cristina Lanzas _______________________________ Dr. Kevin Gross ii BIOGRAPHY A North Carolina native, Meredith was born and raised in Elizabeth City. She attended NC State as an undergraduate, where she was first exposed to the insect world as an undergraduate research assistant investigating ant-mediated seed dispersal. She graduated valedictorian and summa cum laude, receiving a BS in Zoology with a minor in Mathematics in 2011. She worked as a veterinary technician for three years before deciding to combine her passions for veterinary medicine, mathematics, and entomology by pursuing a PhD in Entomology at NC State. Her PhD research focuses on how human-driven land-use change affects mosquito assemblages, and how that in turn affects pathogen transmission utilizing dog heartworm disease as a model system. She was awarded a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship in 2016 to support her PhD research. She is interested broadly in vector- borne disease ecology, public health, and science policy. Outside of research, she enjoys drinking inordinate amounts of coffee and cuddling her horde of furry children: Wren the lab- poodle-shar pei mix, Logan and Cora the boxers, Grim the cat, and Ratticus Finch and Ratt Skiba the dumbo fancy rats. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost I would like to thank my advisors, Michael Reiskind and Rob Dunn, for their guidance, support, and encouragement. I was incredibly lucky to have people that so deeply love science as mentors and sources of inspiration. I am indebted to the entirety of my committee, including Michael, Rob, Wes Watson, Cristina Lanzas, and Kevin Gross, for their feedback on my ideas and work. Your insights greatly improved my learning and my research. All of the Reiskind lab members have graciously shared their expertise, time, and advice, but none more so than Kristen Hopperstad. Special thanks also to Paul Labadie for assisting with my molecular work and troubleshooting when things inevitably went wrong, and to Shawn Janairo for being an encyclopedia of mosquito and heartworm rearing knowledge. My research was funded by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. DGE-1746939 and NC State’s Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology. I would also like to acknowledge the financial support that I received from the American Mosquito Control Association, the Society for Vector Ecology, the Entomological Society of America, Central Life Sciences, Bayer, the Mid-Atlantic Mosquito Control Association, and the North Carolina Mosquito and Vector Control Association for travel to various conferences to communicate my work and enhance my professional development. I had the privilege of working with many fantastic people through a variety of extracurricular activities, including Linnaean Games, the Entomology Graduate Student Association, the university-level Graduate Student Association, and Student Government. Thank you for inspiring me to be a better team member and leader, and for helping me to leave a small mark on NC State. This also seems an appropriate place to acknowledge Michael Reiskind again, for not panicking (too much) when I insisted on being so involved in so many things. I am grateful for your flexibility and trust while I pursued my non-research passions. To the many wonderful friends that have stood by me on this journey and that I’ve met in the process: thank you, thank you, thank you. For the trivia nights, for the dancing, for the gin and tequila drinking, for the long distance phone calls, for everything. You have brought joy and reminded me that I’m still a person outside of my research when I needed reminding. My most heartfelt gratitude to my parents, John and Debbie Spence, and my sister, Leah Creed, for their constant encouragement. Finally, a million thank yous to my patient and supportive husband, Matt Beaulieu. All my love, for now, forever, for on and on and on. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................... vi LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................ vii Chapter 1: Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 References ................................................................................................................................ 4 Chapter 2: Simplification of Vector Communities During Suburban Succession................ 6 Abstract ...................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Mosquito Species Identification Using Convolutional Neural Networks With

    Mosquito Species Identification Using Convolutional Neural Networks With

    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Mosquito species identifcation using convolutional neural networks with a multitiered ensemble model for novel species detection Adam Goodwin1,2*, Sanket Padmanabhan1,2, Sanchit Hira2,3, Margaret Glancey1,2, Monet Slinowsky2, Rakhil Immidisetti2,3, Laura Scavo2, Jewell Brey2, Bala Murali Manoghar Sai Sudhakar1, Tristan Ford1,2, Collyn Heier2, Yvonne‑Marie Linton4,5,6, David B. Pecor4,5,6, Laura Caicedo‑Quiroga4,5,6 & Soumyadipta Acharya2* With over 3500 mosquito species described, accurate species identifcation of the few implicated in disease transmission is critical to mosquito borne disease mitigation. Yet this task is hindered by limited global taxonomic expertise and specimen damage consistent across common capture methods. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are promising with limited sets of species, but image database requirements restrict practical implementation. Using an image database of 2696 specimens from 67 mosquito species, we address the practical open‑set problem with a detection algorithm for novel species. Closed‑set classifcation of 16 known species achieved 97.04 ± 0.87% accuracy independently, and 89.07 ± 5.58% when cascaded with novelty detection. Closed‑set classifcation of 39 species produces a macro F1‑score of 86.07 ± 1.81%. This demonstrates an accurate, scalable, and practical computer vision solution to identify wild‑caught mosquitoes for implementation in biosurveillance and targeted vector control programs, without the need for extensive image database development for each new target region. Mosquitoes are one of the deadliest animals in the world, infecting between 250–500 million people every year with a wide range of fatal or debilitating diseases, including malaria, dengue, chikungunya, Zika and West Nile Virus1.
  • Identification Key for Mosquito Species

    Identification Key for Mosquito Species

    ‘Reverse’ identification key for mosquito species More and more people are getting involved in the surveillance of invasive mosquito species Species name used Synonyms Common name in the EU/EEA, not just professionals with formal training in entomology. There are many in the key taxonomic keys available for identifying mosquitoes of medical and veterinary importance, but they are almost all designed for professionally trained entomologists. Aedes aegypti Stegomyia aegypti Yellow fever mosquito The current identification key aims to provide non-specialists with a simple mosquito recog- Aedes albopictus Stegomyia albopicta Tiger mosquito nition tool for distinguishing between invasive mosquito species and native ones. On the Hulecoeteomyia japonica Asian bush or rock pool Aedes japonicus japonicus ‘female’ illustration page (p. 4) you can select the species that best resembles the specimen. On japonica mosquito the species-specific pages you will find additional information on those species that can easily be confused with that selected, so you can check these additional pages as well. Aedes koreicus Hulecoeteomyia koreica American Eastern tree hole Aedes triseriatus Ochlerotatus triseriatus This key provides the non-specialist with reference material to help recognise an invasive mosquito mosquito species and gives details on the morphology (in the species-specific pages) to help with verification and the compiling of a final list of candidates. The key displays six invasive Aedes atropalpus Georgecraigius atropalpus American rock pool mosquito mosquito species that are present in the EU/EEA or have been intercepted in the past. It also contains nine native species. The native species have been selected based on their morpho- Aedes cretinus Stegomyia cretina logical similarity with the invasive species, the likelihood of encountering them, whether they Aedes geniculatus Dahliana geniculata bite humans and how common they are.
  • A Mosquito Psorophora Ciliata (Fabricius) (Insecta: Diptera: Culicidae)1 Ephraim V

    A Mosquito Psorophora Ciliata (Fabricius) (Insecta: Diptera: Culicidae)1 Ephraim V

    EENY-540 A Mosquito Psorophora ciliata (Fabricius) (Insecta: Diptera: Culicidae)1 Ephraim V. Ragasa and Phillip E. Kaufman2 Introduction For additional information on mosquitoes, see http://edis. ifas.ufl.edu/IN652. Psorophora ciliata (Fabricius) is a large mosquito (Cutwa and O’Meara 2005) that has developed an outsized reputa- tion because of its relatively intimidating heft and persistent Synonymy biting behavior (Gladney and Turner 1969), including Psorophora ciliata (Fabricius 1794) anecdotal historical accounts of its legendary aggressiveness Culex ciliata Fabricius (1794) (Wallis and Whitman 1971) and ‘frightening appearance’ Culex conterrens Walker (1856) (King et al. 1960). The ‘gallinipper’ or ‘shaggy-legged Culex molestus Weidemann (1820) gallinipper’ was used as a common name for Psorophora Culex rubidus Robineau-Desvoidy (1827) ciliata in various published reports (Ross 1947; King et al. Psorophora boscii Robineau-Desvoidy (1827) 1960; Breeland et al. 1961; Goddard et al. 2009). The term Psorophora ctites Dyar (1918) was mentioned much earlier by Flanery (1897) describing (From ITIS 2011) the mosquito as ‘the little zebra-legged thing—the shyest, slyest, meanest, and most venomous of them all’ [sic] but Distribution did not specify what species it was. The word gallinipper Psorophora ciliata usually is associated with other flood- originated as a vernacular term in the southeastern region water mosquitoes, including many species from the Aedes of the United States referring to ‘a large mosquito or other genera (Breeland et al. 1961), and has a wide distribution insect that has a painful bite or sting’ and has appeared in the New World. Floodwater mosquitoes often lay in folk tales, traditional minstrel songs, and a blues their eggs in low-lying areas with damp soil and grassy song referencing a large mosquito with a ‘fearsome bite’ overgrowth.
  • The Mosquitoes of Minnesota

    The Mosquitoes of Minnesota

    Technical Bulletin 228 April 1958 The Mosquitoes of Minnesota (Diptera : Culicidae : Culicinae) A. RALPH BARR University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station ~2 Technirnl Rull!'lin :z2g 1-,he Mosquitoes of J\ilinnesota (Diptera: Culicidae: Culicinae) A. llALPII R\lm University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station CONTENTS I. Introduction JI. Historical Ill. Biology of mosquitoes ................................ Zoogeography Oviposition ......................................... Breeding places of larvae ................................... I) Larrnl p;rowth ....................................... Ill ,\atural factors in the control of larvae .................. JI The pupal stage ............................................... 12 .\lating .................................... _ ..... 12 Feeding of adults ......................................... 12 Hibernation 11 Seasonal distribution II I\ . Techniques Equipment Eggs ............................... · .... · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Larvae Pupae Adults Colonization and rearing . IB \. Systematic treatment Keys to genera Adult females . l'J \fale terminalia . 19 Pupae ······················································· .... ········ 2.'i Larvae ····················································· ..... ········ 2S :-n Anopheles ········································· ··························· Anopheles (Anopheles) barberi .................... · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · earlei ...•......................... · · · · ·
  • Pesticide Discharge Management Plan

    Pesticide Discharge Management Plan

    Pesticide Discharge Management Plan 1. PDMP Team a. Person(s) responsible for managing pests in relation to pest management area: All operational and biological support staff along with the Director of Mosquito Management Services (Wade Brennan, 5531 Pinkney Ave. Sarasota, FL. 34233) b. Person(s) responsible for developing and revising PDMP John Eaton, Operations Supervisor, and Wade Brennan Environmental Scientist III, are the individuals responsible for monitoring changes in Federal and State regulatory agencies that govern mosquito control operations. c. John Eaton, and Wade Brennan, are the individuals responsible for developing, revising and implementing corrective actions and other effluent requirements d. Person(s) responsible for pesticide applications Persons (supervisors and above) who direct applicators these include: All Operational staff employed by Sarasota County Mosquito Management Services that hold a Public Health Pest Control License administered by Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services are directly responsible for pesticide applications (because they can oversee uncertified applicators) additionally, Sarasota County’s awarded Contractors must have required state certification (s). 2. Pest Management Area Description Overview Sarasota County Mosquito Management Services (SCMMS) has been mitigating pestiferous nuisance host seeking mosquitoes of public health importance for over 60 years. A total of forty- four mosquito species are found in Sarasota County of which a dozen are in need of management through a typical peak mosquito season, April through November. When intervention action plans are developed and implemented more than one species is usually involved. Past and current mitigation strategies for both larval and adult mosquitoes have always been in full compliance with FIFRA conditions which have met water quality standards.
  • A Synopsis of the Mosquitoes of Missouri and Their Importance from a Health Perspective Compiled from Literature on the Subject

    A Synopsis of the Mosquitoes of Missouri and Their Importance from a Health Perspective Compiled from Literature on the Subject

    A Synopsis of The Mosquitoes of Missouri and Their Importance From a Health Perspective Compiled from Literature on the Subject by Dr. Barry McCauley St. Charles County Department of Community Health and the Environment St. Charles, Missouri Mark F. Ritter City of St. Louis Health Department St. Louis, Missouri Larry Schaughnessy City of St. Peters Health Department St. Peters, Missouri December 2000 at St. Charles, Missouri This handbook has been prepared for the use of health departments and mosquito control pro- fessionals in the mid-Mississippi region. It has been drafted to fill a perceived need for a single source of information regarding mosquito population types within the state of Missouri and their geographic distribution. Previously, the habitats, behaviors and known distribution ranges of mosquitoes within the state could only be referenced through consultation of several sources - some of them long out of print and difficult to find. It is hoped that this publication may be able to fill a void within the literature and serve as a point of reference for furthering vector control activities within the state. Mosquitoes have long been known as carriers of diseases, such as malaria, yellow fever, den- gue, encephalitis, and heartworm in dogs. Most of these diseases, with the exception of encephalitis and heartworm, have been fairly well eliminated from the entire United States. However, outbreaks of mosquito borne encephalitis have been known to occur in Missouri, and heartworm is an endemic problem, the costs of which are escalating each year, and at the current moment, dengue seems to be making a reappearance in the hotter climates such as Texas.
  • Updated Information Regarding Mosquito Repellents.PDF

    Updated Information Regarding Mosquito Repellents.PDF

    Updated Information regarding Mosquito Repellents May 8, 2008 Repellents are an important tool to assist people in protecting themselves from mosquito-borne diseases. CDC recommends the use of products containing active ingredients which have been registered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for use as repellents applied to skin and clothing. EPA registration of repellent active ingredients indicates the materials have been reviewed and approved for efficacy and human safety when applied according to the instructions on the label. Repellents for use on skin and clothing: CDC evaluation of information contained in peer-reviewed scientific literature and data available from EPA has identified several EPA registered products that provide repellent activity sufficient to help people avoid the bites of disease carrying mosquitoes. Products containing these active ingredients typically provide reasonably long-lasting protection: • DEET (Chemical Name: N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide or N,N-diethly-3-methyl- benzamide) • Picaridin (KBR 3023, Chemical Name: 2-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1- piperidinecarboxylic acid 1-methylpropyl ester ) • Oil of Lemon Eucalyptus* or PMD (Chemical Name: para-Menthane-3,8- diol)the synthesized version of oil of lemon eucalyptus • IR3535 (Chemical Name: 3-[N-Butyl-N-acetyl]-aminopropionic acid, ethyl ester) EPA characterizes the active ingredients DEET and Picaridin as “conventional repellents” and Oil of Lemon Eucalyptus, PMD, and IR3535 as “biopesticide repellents”, which are derived from natural materials. For more information on repellent active ingredients see http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/health/mosquitoes/ai_insectrp.htm ). Published data indicate that repellent efficacy and duration of protection vary considerably among products and among mosquito species and are markedly affected by ambient temperature, amount of perspiration, exposure to water, abrasive removal, and other factors.
  • Mosquitoes in Ohio

    Mosquitoes in Ohio

    Mosquitoes in Ohio There are about 60 different species of mosquito in Ohio. Several of them are capable of transmitting serious, possibly even fatal diseases, such as mosquito-borne encephalitis and malaria to humans. Even in the absence of disease transmission, mosquito bites can result in allergic reactions producing significant discomfort and itching. In some cases excessive scratching can lead to bleeding, scabbing, and possibly even secondary infection. Children are very susceptible to this because they find it difficult to stop scratching. Frequently, they are outside playing and do not realize the extent of their exposure until it is too late. Female mosquitoes can produce a painful bite during feeding, and, in excessive numbers, can inhibit outdoor activities and lower property values. Mosquitoes can be a significant burden on animals, lowering productivity and efficiency of farm animals. Life Cycle Adult mosquitoes are small, fragile insects with slender bodies; one pair of narrow wings (tiny scales are attached to wing veins); and three pairs of long, slender legs. They vary in length from 3/16 to 1/2 inch. Mosquitoes have an elongate "beak" or piercing proboscis. Eggs are elongate, usually about 1/40 inch long, and dark brown to black near hatching. Larvae or "wigglers" are filter feeders that move with an S-shaped motion. Larvae undergo four growth stages called instars before they molt into the pupa or "tumbler" stage. Pupae are comma-shaped and non-feeding and appear to tumble through the water when disturbed. 1 Habits and Diseases Carried Mosquitoes may over-winter as eggs, fertilized adult females or larvae.
  • Setting up a Mosquito Control Program

    Setting up a Mosquito Control Program

    SETTING UP A MOSQUITO CONTROL PROGRAM JEROME GODDARD, Ph.D. MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGIST BUREAU OF GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES MISSISSIPPI STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH P. O. BOX 1700 JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39215-1700 601-576-7689 UPDATED JUNE 2003 PREFACE Mosquito control is undergoing major changes in Mississippi. Instead of just routinely spraying malathion or a pyrethroid out of trucks several nights weekly, mosquito control personnel are now trying to get the most control with the least amount of pesticides. This involves source reduction to eliminate mosquito breeding areas, larviciding areas of standing water, and carefully timed, strategically placed insecticides aimed at the adult mosquitoes. This booklet outlines the components of an integrated mosquito control program with emphasis on incorporating surveillance and larviciding into existing programs. General information is provided as a review of control and surveillance techniques commonly used. In addition, this booklet describes some problem mosquitoes found in Mississippi and discusses their importance as public health and pest problems. NOTE: Much of this publication was originally compiled and illustrated by the former medical entomologist with the Mississippi State Department of Health, Mr. Ed Bowles. It has been revised several times by myself and Dr. Brigid Elchos, State Public Health Veterinarian. Jerome Goddard, Ph.D. Medical Entomologist MOSQUITO CONTROL AND PUBLIC HEALTH Mosquitoes and the diseases they carry have played an important role in our history. Epidemics of mosquito-borne diseases were once common in the United States. Outbreaks of yellow fever occurred as far north as Philadelphia during the colonial period, and epidemics took many lives in New Orleans until 1905.
  • MOSQUITOES of the SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES

    MOSQUITOES of the SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES

    L f ^-l R A R > ^l^ ■'■mx^ • DEC2 2 59SO , A Handbook of tnV MOSQUITOES of the SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES W. V. King G. H. Bradley Carroll N. Smith and W. C. MeDuffle Agriculture Handbook No. 173 Agricultural Research Service UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE \ I PRECAUTIONS WITH INSECTICIDES All insecticides are potentially hazardous to fish or other aqpiatic organisms, wildlife, domestic ani- mals, and man. The dosages needed for mosquito control are generally lower than for most other insect control, but caution should be exercised in their application. Do not apply amounts in excess of the dosage recommended for each specific use. In applying even small amounts of oil-insecticide sprays to water, consider that wind and wave action may shift the film with consequent damage to aquatic life at another location. Heavy applications of insec- ticides to ground areas such as in pretreatment situa- tions, may cause harm to fish and wildlife in streams, ponds, and lakes during runoff due to heavy rains. Avoid contamination of pastures and livestock with insecticides in order to prevent residues in meat and milk. Operators should avoid repeated or prolonged contact of insecticides with the skin. Insecticide con- centrates may be particularly hazardous. Wash off any insecticide spilled on the skin using soap and water. If any is spilled on clothing, change imme- diately. Store insecticides in a safe place out of reach of children or animals. Dispose of empty insecticide containers. Always read and observe instructions and precautions given on the label of the product. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agriculture Handbook No.
  • Testing Effects of Aerial Spray Technologies on Biting Flies

    Testing Effects of Aerial Spray Technologies on Biting Flies

    TESTING EFFECTS OF AERIAL SPRAY TECHNOLOGIES ON BITING FLIES AND NONTARGET INSECTS AT THE PARRIS ISLAND MARINE CORPS RECRUIT DEPOT, SOUTH CAROLINA, USA. A dissertation submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Mark S. Breidenbaugh December 2008 Dissertation written by Mark S. Breidenbaugh B.S., California State Polytechnic University, Pomona 1994 M.S., University of California, Riverside, 1997 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2008 Approved by _____________________________, Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Ferenc A. de Szalay _____________________________, Members, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Benjamin A. Foote _____________________________ Mark W. Kershner _____________________________ Scott C. Sheridan Accepted by ______________________________, Chair, Department of Biological Sciences James L. Blank ______________________________, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences John R.D. Stalvey ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES……………………………………………………………………viii LIST OF TABLES………………………………………………………………………xii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………………….…………………………………………xiv CHAPTER I. An introduction to the biting flies of Parris Island and the use of aerial spray technologies in their control……………………………………………..1 Biology of biting midges .....……..……………………………………………..1 Culicoides as nuisance pests and vectors……………………………3 Biology of mosquitoes…………………………………………………………..5 Mosquitoes as nuisance pests and vectors…………………………..6 Integrated pest management…………………………………………………..7 Physical barriers…………………………………………………………8
  • Diptera: Culicidae) in the Laboratory Sara Marie Erickson Iowa State University

    Diptera: Culicidae) in the Laboratory Sara Marie Erickson Iowa State University

    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1-1-2005 Infection and transmission of West Nile virus by Ochlerotatus triseriatus (Diptera: Culicidae) in the laboratory Sara Marie Erickson Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Recommended Citation Erickson, Sara Marie, "Infection and transmission of West Nile virus by Ochlerotatus triseriatus (Diptera: Culicidae) in the laboratory" (2005). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 18773. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/18773 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Infection and transmission of West Nile virus by Ochlerotatus triseriatus (Diptera: Culicidae) in the laboratory by Sara Marie Erickson A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major: Entomology Program of Study Committee: Wayne A. Rowley, Major Professor Russell A. Jurenka Kenneth B. Platt Marlin E. Rice Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2005 Copyright © Sara Marie Erickson, 2005. All rights reserved. 11 Graduate College Iowa State University This is to certify that the master's thesis of Sara Marie Erickson has met the thesis requirements of Iowa State University Signatures have been redacted for privacy lll TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES lV ABSTRACT v CHAPTER 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION Thesis organization 1 Literature review 1 References 18 CHAPTER 2.