DOCSLIB.ORG

T3-B4p2innovativemosquitocontrol.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
T3-B4p2innovativemosquitocontrol.Pdf Suffolk County Vector Control and Wetlands Management Long-Term Plan Literature Review Task3 – Innovations in and Unconventional Mosquito Control March 2005 SUFFOLK COUNTY VECTOR CONTROL AND WETLANDS MANAGEMENT LONG - TERM PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT PROJECT SPONSOR Steve Levy Suffolk County Executive Department of Public Works Department of Health Services Charles J. Bartha, P.E. Brian L. Harper, M.D., M.P.H. Commissioner Commissioner Richard LaValle, P.E. Vito Minei, P.E. Chief Deputy Commissioner Director, Division of Environmental Quality Leslie A. Mitchel Deputy Commissioner PROJECT MANAGEMENT Project Manager: Walter Dawydiak, P.E., J.D. Chief Engineer, Division of Environmental Quality, Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Public Suffolk County Department of Works, Division of Vector Control Health Services, Office of Ecology Dominick V. Ninivaggi Martin Trent Superintendent Acting Chief Tom Iwanejko Kim Shaw Entomologist Bureau Supervisor Mary E. Dempsey Robert M. Waters Biologist Bureau Supervisor Laura Bavaro Senior Environmental Analyst Erin Duffy Environmental Analyst Phil DeBlasi Environmental Analyst Jeanine Schlosser Principal Clerk Cashin Associates, P.C. and Cameron Engineering & Associates, LLP i Suffolk County Vector Control and Wetlands Management Long-Term Plan Literature Review Task3 – Innovations in and Unconventional Mosquito Control March 2005 SUFFOLK COUNTY LONG TERM PLAN CONSULTANT TEAM Cashin Associates, P.C. Hauppauge, NY Subconsultants Cameron Engineering, L.L.P. Syosset, NY Integral Consulting Annapolis, MD Bowne Management Systems, Inc. Mineola, NY Kamazima Lwiza, PhD Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY Ducks Unlimited Stony Brook, NY Steven Goodbred, PhD & Laboratory Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY RTP Environmental Westbury, NY Sinnreich, Safar & Kosakoff Central Islip, NY Bruce Brownawell, PhD & Laboratory Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY Anne McElroy, PhD & Laboratory Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY Andrew Spielman, PhD Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA Richard Pollack, PhD Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA Wayne Crans, PhD Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ Susan Teitelbaum, PhD Mount Sinai School of Medicine, NY Zawicki Vector Management Consultants Freehold, NJ Michael Bottini, Turtle Researcher East Hampton, NY Robert Turner, PhD & Laboratory Southampton College, NY Christopher Gobler, PhD & Laboratory Southampton College, NY Jerome Goddard, PhD Mississippi Department of Health, Jackson, MS Sergio Sanudo, PhD & Laboratory Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY Suffolk County Department of Health Services, Hauppauge, NY Division of Environmental Quality Cashin Associates, P.C. and Cameron Engineering & Associates, LLP ii Suffolk County Vector Control and Wetlands Management Long-Term Plan Literature Review Task3 – Innovations in and Unconventional Mosquito Control March 2005 Primary research for this report was conducted by Jerome Goddard, PhD (Mississippi Department of Health) with Cashin Associates (personnel including David J. Tonjes, PhD), and Wayne Crans, PhD (Rutgers University). It was edited and revised in response to comments by Cameron Engineering (personnel including David Berg) and Cashin Associates (personnel including David Tonjes, PhD). Review was provided by Wayne Crans, PhD (Rutgers University), William Zawicki (Zawicki Vector Management Consultants), Suffolk County Department of Public Works, Division of Vector Control (personnel including Dominick Ninivaggi and Mary Dempsey), and Suffolk County Department of Health Services (personnel including Erin Duffy). Additional comments have been received from Jack Mattice, NY Sea Grant. Cashin Associates, P.C. and Cameron Engineering & Associates, LLP iii Suffolk County Vector Control and Wetlands Management Long-Term Plan Literature Review Task 3 – Innovations in and Unconventional Mosquito Control March 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVEATIONS AND ACRONYMS.................................................................. vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...........................................................................................................1 1. INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................6 2. SURVEILLANCE....................................................................................................................8 2.1. Landing Rates ...................................................................................................................8 2.2. Mosquito Egg Surveys/Oviposition (Gravid) Traps .........................................................8 2.3. Larval Surveys ..................................................................................................................9 2.4. Adult Surveys..................................................................................................................10 2.5. Daytime Resting Stations................................................................................................10 2.6. Light Traps......................................................................................................................11 2.7. West Nile And Other Arboviral Surveillance.................................................................11 2.7.1. Communicating with other Professionals .............................................................12 2.7.2. Sampling Wild Bird Populations ..........................................................................13 2.7.3. Sampling Sentinel Flocks .....................................................................................14 2.7.4. Wild Bird Sampling Methods ...............................................................................14 2.7.5. Predicting Disease Incidence ................................................................................15 3. REPELLENTS .......................................................................................................................17 3.1. Plant Oil Concentrate.....................................................................................................17 3.2. Garlic-Based Repellents.................................................................................................18 3.3. Ultrasonic Mosquito Repellents.....................................................................................19 3.4. Scent-Based Repellent ...................................................................................................19 4. MECHANICAL CONTROLS..............................................................................................21 5. TRAPS ....................................................................................................................................22 6. BIOLOGICAL CONTROLS................................................................................................24 6.1. Bacteria ..........................................................................................................................24 6.2. Tadpole Shrimp..............................................................................................................26 6.3. Fish.................................................................................................................................27 6.4. Reputed Mosquito Predators..........................................................................................28 6.5. Other Organisms ............................................................................................................30 6.6. Genetic Controls ............................................................................................................31 6.7. Trans-genetic Controls...................................................................................................32 7. CHEMICAL CONTROLS....................................................................................................34 7.1. Storm Drain Larvicides..................................................................................................34 7.2. Monomolecular Films....................................................................................................34 7.3. Insect Growth Regulator - Methoprene .........................................................................36 Cashin Associates, P.C. and Cameron Engineering & Associates, LLP iv Suffolk County Vector Control and Wetlands Management Long-Term Plan Literature Review Task 3 – Innovations in and Unconventional Mosquito Control March 2005 7.4 Insect Growth Regulator - Novaluron............................................................................37 7.5 Cinnamon Oils ................................................................................................................37 7.6 Adulticides ......................................................................................................................38 7.6.1. Resistance Management........................................................................................40 7.6.2. Automatic Misters for Residential Use.................................................................41 7.6.3. Sucrose-Based Mosquito Feeders.........................................................................41 7.6.4. Novel Use of Thermal Fogging in Storm Drains..................................................41 8. HOME AND PERSONAL CONTROL MEASURES........................................................43 9. CONTROL TRIGGERS.......................................................................................................45
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Identification Key for Mosquito Species
    ‘Reverse’ identification key for mosquito species More and more people are getting involved in the surveillance of invasive mosquito species Species name used Synonyms Common name in the EU/EEA, not just professionals with formal training in entomology. There are many in the key taxonomic keys available for identifying mosquitoes of medical and veterinary importance, but they are almost all designed for professionally trained entomologists. Aedes aegypti Stegomyia aegypti Yellow fever mosquito The current identification key aims to provide non-specialists with a simple mosquito recog- Aedes albopictus Stegomyia albopicta Tiger mosquito nition tool for distinguishing between invasive mosquito species and native ones. On the Hulecoeteomyia japonica Asian bush or rock pool Aedes japonicus japonicus ‘female’ illustration page (p. 4) you can select the species that best resembles the specimen. On japonica mosquito the species-specific pages you will find additional information on those species that can easily be confused with that selected, so you can check these additional pages as well. Aedes koreicus Hulecoeteomyia koreica American Eastern tree hole Aedes triseriatus Ochlerotatus triseriatus This key provides the non-specialist with reference material to help recognise an invasive mosquito mosquito species and gives details on the morphology (in the species-specific pages) to help with verification and the compiling of a final list of candidates. The key displays six invasive Aedes atropalpus Georgecraigius atropalpus American rock pool mosquito mosquito species that are present in the EU/EEA or have been intercepted in the past. It also contains nine native species. The native species have been selected based on their morpho- Aedes cretinus Stegomyia cretina logical similarity with the invasive species, the likelihood of encountering them, whether they Aedes geniculatus Dahliana geniculata bite humans and how common they are.
    [Show full text]
  • Spongeweed-Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles Are Highly Effective
    Environ Sci Pollut Res (2016) 23:16671–16685 DOI 10.1007/s11356-016-6832-9 RESEARCH ARTICLE Eco-friendly drugs from the marine environment: spongeweed-synthesized silver nanoparticles are highly effective on Plasmodium falciparum and its vector Anopheles stephensi, with little non-target effects on predatory copepods Kadarkarai Murugan1,2 & Chellasamy Panneerselvam3 & Jayapal Subramaniam1 & Pari Madhiyazhagan1 & Jiang-Shiou Hwang4 & Lan Wang5 & Devakumar Dinesh1 & Udaiyan Suresh1 & Mathath Roni1 & Akon Higuchi6 & Marcello Nicoletti7 & Giovanni Benelli8,9 Received: 13 April 2016 /Accepted: 4 May 2016 /Published online: 16 May 2016 # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016 Abstract Mosquitoes act as vectors of devastating pathogens (EDX), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). In mosquitocidal assays, and parasites, representing a key threat for millions of humans the 50 % lethal concentration (LC50)ofC. tomentosum extract and animals worldwide. The control of mosquito-borne dis- against Anopheles stephensi ranged from 255.1 (larva I) to eases is facing a number of crucial challenges, including the 487.1 ppm (pupa). LC50 of C. tomentosum-synthesized emergence of artemisinin and chloroquine resistance in AgNP ranged from 18.1 (larva I) to 40.7 ppm (pupa). In lab- Plasmodium parasites, as well as the presence of mosquito oratory, the predation efficiency of Mesocyclops aspericornis vectors resistant to synthetic and microbial pesticides. copepods against A. stephensi larvae was 81, 65, 17, and 9 % Therefore, eco-friendly tools are urgently required. Here, a (I, II, III, and IV instar, respectively). In AgNP contaminated synergic approach relying to nanotechnologies and biological environment, predation was not affected; 83, 66, 19, and 11 % control strategies is proposed.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecologically Sound Mosquito Management in Wetlands. the Xerces
    Ecologically Sound Mosquito Management in Wetlands An Overview of Mosquito Control Practices, the Risks, Benefits, and Nontarget Impacts, and Recommendations on Effective Practices that Control Mosquitoes, Reduce Pesticide Use, and Protect Wetlands. Celeste Mazzacano and Scott Hoffman Black The Xerces Society FOR INVERTEBRATE CONSERVATION Ecologically Sound Mosquito Management in Wetlands An Overview of Mosquito Control Practices, the Risks, Benefits, and Nontarget Impacts, and Recommendations on Effective Practices that Control Mosquitoes, Reduce Pesticide Use, and Protect Wetlands. Celeste Mazzacano Scott Hoffman Black The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation Oregon • California • Minnesota • Michigan New Jersey • North Carolina www.xerces.org The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation is a nonprofit organization that protects wildlife through the conservation of invertebrates and their habitat. Established in 1971, the Society is at the forefront of invertebrate protection, harnessing the knowledge of scientists and the enthusiasm of citi- zens to implement conservation programs worldwide. The Society uses advocacy, education, and ap- plied research to promote invertebrate conservation. The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation 628 NE Broadway, Suite 200, Portland, OR 97232 Tel (855) 232-6639 Fax (503) 233-6794 www.xerces.org Regional offices in California, Minnesota, Michigan, New Jersey, and North Carolina. © 2013 by The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation Acknowledgements Our thanks go to the photographers for allowing us to use their photos. Copyright of all photos re- mains with the photographers. In addition, we thank Jennifer Hopwood for reviewing the report. Editing and layout: Matthew Shepherd Funding for this report was provided by The New-Land Foundation, Meyer Memorial Trust, The Bul- litt Foundation, The Edward Gorey Charitable Trust, Cornell Douglas Foundation, Maki Foundation, and Xerces Society members.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Information Regarding Mosquito Repellents.PDF
    Updated Information regarding Mosquito Repellents May 8, 2008 Repellents are an important tool to assist people in protecting themselves from mosquito-borne diseases. CDC recommends the use of products containing active ingredients which have been registered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for use as repellents applied to skin and clothing. EPA registration of repellent active ingredients indicates the materials have been reviewed and approved for efficacy and human safety when applied according to the instructions on the label. Repellents for use on skin and clothing: CDC evaluation of information contained in peer-reviewed scientific literature and data available from EPA has identified several EPA registered products that provide repellent activity sufficient to help people avoid the bites of disease carrying mosquitoes. Products containing these active ingredients typically provide reasonably long-lasting protection: • DEET (Chemical Name: N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide or N,N-diethly-3-methyl- benzamide) • Picaridin (KBR 3023, Chemical Name: 2-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1- piperidinecarboxylic acid 1-methylpropyl ester ) • Oil of Lemon Eucalyptus* or PMD (Chemical Name: para-Menthane-3,8- diol)the synthesized version of oil of lemon eucalyptus • IR3535 (Chemical Name: 3-[N-Butyl-N-acetyl]-aminopropionic acid, ethyl ester) EPA characterizes the active ingredients DEET and Picaridin as “conventional repellents” and Oil of Lemon Eucalyptus, PMD, and IR3535 as “biopesticide repellents”, which are derived from natural materials. For more information on repellent active ingredients see http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/health/mosquitoes/ai_insectrp.htm ). Published data indicate that repellent efficacy and duration of protection vary considerably among products and among mosquito species and are markedly affected by ambient temperature, amount of perspiration, exposure to water, abrasive removal, and other factors.
    [Show full text]
  • Mosquitoes in Ohio
    Mosquitoes in Ohio There are about 60 different species of mosquito in Ohio. Several of them are capable of transmitting serious, possibly even fatal diseases, such as mosquito-borne encephalitis and malaria to humans. Even in the absence of disease transmission, mosquito bites can result in allergic reactions producing significant discomfort and itching. In some cases excessive scratching can lead to bleeding, scabbing, and possibly even secondary infection. Children are very susceptible to this because they find it difficult to stop scratching. Frequently, they are outside playing and do not realize the extent of their exposure until it is too late. Female mosquitoes can produce a painful bite during feeding, and, in excessive numbers, can inhibit outdoor activities and lower property values. Mosquitoes can be a significant burden on animals, lowering productivity and efficiency of farm animals. Life Cycle Adult mosquitoes are small, fragile insects with slender bodies; one pair of narrow wings (tiny scales are attached to wing veins); and three pairs of long, slender legs. They vary in length from 3/16 to 1/2 inch. Mosquitoes have an elongate "beak" or piercing proboscis. Eggs are elongate, usually about 1/40 inch long, and dark brown to black near hatching. Larvae or "wigglers" are filter feeders that move with an S-shaped motion. Larvae undergo four growth stages called instars before they molt into the pupa or "tumbler" stage. Pupae are comma-shaped and non-feeding and appear to tumble through the water when disturbed. 1 Habits and Diseases Carried Mosquitoes may over-winter as eggs, fertilized adult females or larvae.
    [Show full text]
  • Setting up a Mosquito Control Program
    SETTING UP A MOSQUITO CONTROL PROGRAM JEROME GODDARD, Ph.D. MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGIST BUREAU OF GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES MISSISSIPPI STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH P. O. BOX 1700 JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39215-1700 601-576-7689 UPDATED JUNE 2003 PREFACE Mosquito control is undergoing major changes in Mississippi. Instead of just routinely spraying malathion or a pyrethroid out of trucks several nights weekly, mosquito control personnel are now trying to get the most control with the least amount of pesticides. This involves source reduction to eliminate mosquito breeding areas, larviciding areas of standing water, and carefully timed, strategically placed insecticides aimed at the adult mosquitoes. This booklet outlines the components of an integrated mosquito control program with emphasis on incorporating surveillance and larviciding into existing programs. General information is provided as a review of control and surveillance techniques commonly used. In addition, this booklet describes some problem mosquitoes found in Mississippi and discusses their importance as public health and pest problems. NOTE: Much of this publication was originally compiled and illustrated by the former medical entomologist with the Mississippi State Department of Health, Mr. Ed Bowles. It has been revised several times by myself and Dr. Brigid Elchos, State Public Health Veterinarian. Jerome Goddard, Ph.D. Medical Entomologist MOSQUITO CONTROL AND PUBLIC HEALTH Mosquitoes and the diseases they carry have played an important role in our history. Epidemics of mosquito-borne diseases were once common in the United States. Outbreaks of yellow fever occurred as far north as Philadelphia during the colonial period, and epidemics took many lives in New Orleans until 1905.
    [Show full text]
  • VERNAL POOL TADPOLE SHRIMP Lepidurus Packardi
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Sacramento Fish & Wildlife Office Species Account VERNAL POOL TADPOLE SHRIMP Lepidurus packardi CLASSIFICATION: Endangered Federal Register 59-48136; September 19, 1994 http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/federal_register/fr2692.pdf On October 9, 2007, we published a 5-year review recommending that the species remain listed as endangered. CRITICAL HABITAT: Designated Originally designated in Federal Register 68:46683; August 6, 2003. The designation was revised in FR 70:46923; August 11, 2005. Species by unit designations were published in FR 71:7117 (PDF), February 10, 2006. RECOVERY PLAN: Final Recovery Plan for Vernal Pool Ecosystems of California and Southern Oregon, December 15, 2005. http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/recovery_plan/060614.pdf DESCRIPTION The vernal pool tadpole shrimp (Lepidurus packardi) is a small crustacean in the Triopsidae family. It has compound eyes, a large shield-like carapace (shell) that covers most of the body, and a pair of long cercopods (appendages) at the end of the last abdominal segment. Vernal pool tadpole shrimp adults reach a length of 2 inches in length. They have about 35 pairs of legs and two long cercopods. This species superficially resembles the rice field tadpole shrimp (Triops longicaudatus). Tadpole shrimp climb or scramble over objects, as well as plowing along or within bottom sediments. Their diet consists of organic debris and living organisms, such as fairy shrimp and other invertebrates. This animal inhabits vernal pools containing clear to highly turbid water, ranging in size from 54 square feet in the former Mather Air Force Base area of Sacramento County, to the 89-acre Olcott Lake at Jepson Prairie.
    [Show full text]
  • Crustaceans Topics in Biodiversity
    Topics in Biodiversity The Encyclopedia of Life is an unprecedented effort to gather scientific knowledge about all life on earth- multimedia, information, facts, and more. Learn more at eol.org. Crustaceans Authors: Simone Nunes Brandão, Zoologisches Museum Hamburg Jen Hammock, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution Frank Ferrari, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution Photo credit: Blue Crab (Callinectes sapidus) by Jeremy Thorpe, Flickr: EOL Images. CC BY-NC-SA Defining the crustacean The Latin root, crustaceus, "having a crust or shell," really doesn’t entirely narrow it down to crustaceans. They belong to the phylum Arthropoda, as do insects, arachnids, and many other groups; all arthropods have hard exoskeletons or shells, segmented bodies, and jointed limbs. Crustaceans are usually distinguishable from the other arthropods in several important ways, chiefly: Biramous appendages. Most crustaceans have appendages or limbs that are split into two, usually segmented, branches. Both branches originate on the same proximal segment. Larvae. Early in development, most crustaceans go through a series of larval stages, the first being the nauplius larva, in which only a few limbs are present, near the front on the body; crustaceans add their more posterior limbs as they grow and develop further. The nauplius larva is unique to Crustacea. Eyes. The early larval stages of crustaceans have a single, simple, median eye composed of three similar, closely opposed parts. This larval eye, or “naupliar eye,” often disappears later in development, but on some crustaceans (e.g., the branchiopod Triops) it is retained even after the adult compound eyes have developed. In all copepod crustaceans, this larval eye is retained throughout their development as the 1 only eye, although the three similar parts may separate and each become associated with their own cuticular lens.
    [Show full text]
  • Copepoda: Crustacea) in the Neotropics Silva, WM.* Departamento Ciências Do Ambiente, Campus Pantanal, Universidade Federal De Mato Grosso Do Sul – UFMS, Av
    Diversity and distribution of the free-living freshwater Cyclopoida (Copepoda: Crustacea) in the Neotropics Silva, WM.* Departamento Ciências do Ambiente, Campus Pantanal, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul – UFMS, Av. Rio Branco, 1270, CEP 79304-020, Corumbá, MS, Brazil *e-mail: [email protected] Received March 26, 2008 – Accepted March 26, 2008 – Distributed November 30, 2008 (With 1 figure) Abstract Cyclopoida species from the Neotropics are listed and their distributions are commented. The results showed 148 spe- cies in the Neotropics, where 83 species were recorded in the northern region (above upon Equator) and 110 species in the southern region (below the Equator). Species richness and endemism are related more to the number of specialists than to environmental complexity. New researcher should be made on to the Copepod taxonomy and the and new skills utilized to solve the main questions on the true distributions and Cyclopoida diversity patterns in the Neotropics. Keywords: Cyclopoida diversity, Copepoda, Neotropics, Americas, latitudinal distribution. Diversidade e distribuição dos Cyclopoida (Copepoda:Crustacea) de vida livre de água doce nos Neotrópicos Resumo Foram listadas as espécies de Cyclopoida dos Neotrópicos e sua distribuição comentada. Os resultados mostram um número de 148 espécies, sendo que 83 espécies registradas na Região Norte (acima da linha do Equador) e 110 na Região Sul (abaixo da linha do Equador). A riqueza de espécies e o endemismo estiveram relacionados mais com o número de especialistas do que com a complexidade ambiental. Novos especialistas devem ser formados em taxo- nomia de Copepoda e utilizar novas ferramentas para resolver as questões sobre a real distribuição e os padrões de diversidade dos Copepoda Cyclopoida nos Neotrópicos.
    [Show full text]
  • Herpetofauna and Aquatic Macro-Invertebrate Use of the Kino Environmental Restoration Project (KERP)
    Herpetofauna and Aquatic Macro-invertebrate Use of the Kino Environmental Restoration Project (KERP) Tucson, Pima County, Arizona Prepared for Pima County Regional Flood Control District Prepared by EPG, Inc. JANUARY 2007 - Plma County Regional FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT MEMORANDUM Water Resources Regional Flood Control District DATE: January 5,2007 TO: Distribution FROM: Julia Fonseca SUBJECT: Kino Ecosystem Restoration Project Report The Ed Pastor Environmental Restoration ProjectiKino Ecosystem Restoration Project (KERP) is becoming an extraordinary urban wildlife resource. As such, the Pima County Regional Flood Control District (PCRFCD) contracted with the Environmental Planning Group (EPG) to gather observations of reptiles, amphibians, and aquatic insects at KERP. Water quality was also examined. The purpose of the work was to provide baseline data on current wildlife use of the KERP site, and to assess water quality for post-project aquatic wildlife conditions. I additionally requested sampling of macroinvertebrates at Agua Caliente Park and Sweetwater Wetlands in hopes that the differences in aquatic wildlife among the three sites might provide insights into the different habitats offered by KERF'. The results One of the most important wildlife benefits that KERP provides is aquatic habitat without predatory bullfrogs and non- native fish. Most other constructed ponds and wetlands in Tucson, such as the Sweetwater Wetlands and Agua Caliente pond, are fuIl of non-native predators which devastate native fish, amphibians and aquatic reptiles. The KERP Wetlands may provide an opportunity for reestablishing declining native herpetofauna. Provided that non- native fish, bullfrogs or crayfish are not introduced, KERP appears to provide adequate habitat for Sonoran Mud Turtles (Kinosternon sonoriense), Lowland Leopard Frogs (Rana yavapaiensis), and Mexican Gartersnakes (Tharnnophis eques) and Southwestern Woodhouse Toad (Bufo woodhousii australis).
    [Show full text]
  • Crustacea, Notostraca) from Iran
    Journal of Biological Research -Thessaloniki 19 : 75 – 79 , 20 13 J. Biol. Res. -Thessalon. is available online at http://www.jbr.gr Indexed in: Wos (Web of science, IsI thomson), sCOPUs, CAs (Chemical Abstracts service) and dOAj (directory of Open Access journals) — Short CommuniCation — on the occurrence of Lepidurus apus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Crustacea, notostraca) from iran Behroz AtAshBAr 1,2 *, N aser Agh 2, L ynda BeLAdjAL 1 and johan MerteNs 1 1 Department of Biology , Faculty of Science , Ghent University , K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35 , 9000 Gent , Belgium 2 Department of Biology and Aquaculture , Artemia and Aquatic Animals Research Institute , Urmia University , Urmia-57153 , Iran received: 16 November 2011 Accepted after revision: 18 july 2012 the occurrence of Lepidurus apus in Iran is reported for the first time. this species was found in Aigher goli located in the mountains area, east Azerbaijan province (North east, Iran). details on biogeography, ecology and morphology of this species are provided. Key words: Lepidurus apus , Aigher goli, east Azerbaijan, Iran. INtrOdUCtION their world-wide distribution is due to their anti qu - ity, but possibly also to their passive transport: geo - Notostracan records date back to the Carboniferous graphical barriers are more effective for non-passive - and possibly up to the devonian period (Wallossek, ly distributed animals. From an ecological point of 1993, 1995; Kelber, 1998). In fact, there are Upper view, notostracans, like most branchiopods, are re - triassic Triops fossils from germany
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera: Culicidae) in the Laboratory Sara Marie Erickson Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1-1-2005 Infection and transmission of West Nile virus by Ochlerotatus triseriatus (Diptera: Culicidae) in the laboratory Sara Marie Erickson Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Recommended Citation Erickson, Sara Marie, "Infection and transmission of West Nile virus by Ochlerotatus triseriatus (Diptera: Culicidae) in the laboratory" (2005). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 18773. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/18773 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Infection and transmission of West Nile virus by Ochlerotatus triseriatus (Diptera: Culicidae) in the laboratory by Sara Marie Erickson A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major: Entomology Program of Study Committee: Wayne A. Rowley, Major Professor Russell A. Jurenka Kenneth B. Platt Marlin E. Rice Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2005 Copyright © Sara Marie Erickson, 2005. All rights reserved. 11 Graduate College Iowa State University This is to certify that the master's thesis of Sara Marie Erickson has met the thesis requirements of Iowa State University Signatures have been redacted for privacy lll TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES lV ABSTRACT v CHAPTER 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION Thesis organization 1 Literature review 1 References 18 CHAPTER 2.
    [Show full text]