Oral History Interview with Jonathan Sachs
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
121012 Tech Legend Sees Soma Oakland SFBT
Tech legend sees SoMa - in Oakland October 12, 2012 By Blanca Torres Mitch Kapor and Freada Kapor Klein are investing in Oakland’s future. When famed technology titan and philanthropist Mitch Kapor looks at Oakland, he remembers South of Market in San Francisco the way it was in the late 1990s. Former industrial properties were being transformed into inexpensive spaces for both startup tech companies and residents. There was a buzz of innovation in the air. SoMa today is not the same place Kapor remembers, but Oakland could be. “Oakland in particular is the next great South of Market,” Kapor said. “It will be to this decade what South of Market was to the previous one. There’s lots of space, both to work and to live, lots of energy and lots of opportunity. People just sense potential.” With that belief in mind, Kapor and his wife, Freada Kapor Klein, moved the operations of Kapor Capital, Kapor Enterprises Inc., the Kapor Foundation and Level Playing Field Institute, a nonprofit, to Oakland’s Uptown neighborhood from a previous location in SoMa. Kapor made his name and fortune from Lotus Development Corp., maker of the Lotus 1-2-3 spreadsheet and Lotus Notes software applications. The Kapors, along with Oakland business and community leaders, see the move as much more than just physical. It could serve as a major endorsement for Oakland’s technology sector, which so far features a handful of big names — Pandora Media, Ask.com and Sungevity — but has yet to detonate. “Oakland is a welcoming environment for innovators and for people who cross boundaries because we’re not just doing tech, we’re doing tech with social impact,” Kapor said. -
Cyberspace and the "Devil's Hatband"
ARTICLE Cyberspace and the "Devil's Hatband" JonathanJ. Rusch* INTRODUCTION "I cannot remember a time," the novelist Robertson Davies wrote, "when I did not take it as understood that everybody has at least two, if not twenty-two, sides to him."' Davies' comment gives us a convenient point of departure to explore the relationship between law and cyberspace. Anyone who spends a significant amount of time on the Internet knows that the Net has at least two, if not twenty-two, sides to it. Auction sites, chat rooms, instant messaging, knowledge networks, and Net radio are but a few of the Internet's constantly expanding capabilities for communication, commerce, and social interaction. It seems remarkable, then, that at a time when we are seeking to understand and enhance a medium of such Protean charac- ter, so much of our thinking about the Internet has remained bound to-and bounded by-the same few metaphors that have dominated Internet culture over the past decade. No metaphor has been more pervasive in this regard than the concept of cyberspace as the "Wild West." Early visionaries of the Internet characterized it as an "electronic frontier, "2' comparing its * Special Counsel for Fraud Prevention, Fraud Section, Criminal Division, U.S. Depart- ment of Justice; Adjunct Professor, Georgetown University Law Center. This Article is a substantial revision and expansion of a presentation I gave on April 1, 2000, at the Seattle University School of Law's Internet Law Institute. The views in this Article are solely those of the author and not necessarily those of the Department of Justice or any officer or component thereof. -
IBM PC Club IBM PC Club
San Jose PC CI ub Newsletter Document Number SJPCN03 May 4, 1982 Edited by Bonnie Lamb F98/142 San Jose 8 + 276-3653 VM(SJEVMl/LAMB) IBM PC Club IBM PC Club CONTENTS IBM SAN JOSE PC NEWSLETTER 1 Errata 1 April Meeting . 2 Special Interest Groups (SIG) 3 Survey Results ....... 3 San Jose PC Club Profile 5 Tips and Techniques 6 Programming notes 8 Electrohome 1302 Color Monitor with the PC 11 VOLKSWRITER Comparison to EASYWRITER 12 PC Puzzler 14 I nstall Notes 16 PC Club Program Library Directory 17 PC Add-Ons .... 19 SORT Comparisons 20 Help Wanted/Help Offered 21 Classified 22 PC Newsletter Articles 23 ii SJPCN03 05/04/82 IBM PC Club IBM SAN JOSE PC NEWSLETTER This month's newsletter has some survey results, sort performance information, a crossword puzzle (don't peek at the answers), and other good stuff. Time is short, we should have gone to press yesterday, so I'll close with next month's activity schedule: DATE DAY TIME LOCATION EVENT May 11 Tue. 5 p.m. STL Cafeteria PC Club Meeting May 12 Wed. 7:30p.m. DYSAN Santa Clara SVCC May 18 Tue. 5 p.m. STL K210 Phototypsetting SIG May 25 Tue. 5 p.m. STL K210 Visiclub (SIG) Meeting June 1 Tue. 5 p.m. STL K210 Advisory Meeting ERRATA The Silicon Valley Computer Club (SVCC) has found a bug in the BIOS modification that was printed in SJPCNOI to allow double-sided floppies. Details of symptoms and a possible fix are in the works. Look in next month's newsletter for this in formation. -
The Origins of Word Processing and Office Automation
Remembering the Office of the Future: The Origins of Word Processing and Office Automation Thomas Haigh University of Wisconsin Word processing entered the American office in 1970 as an idea about reorganizing typists, but its meaning soon shifted to describe computerized text editing. The designers of word processing systems combined existing technologies to exploit the falling costs of interactive computing, creating a new business quite separate from the emerging world of the personal computer. Most people first experienced word processing using a word processor, we think of a software as an application of the personal computer. package, such as Microsoft Word. However, in During the 1980s, word processing rivaled and the early 1970s, when the idea of word process- eventually overtook spreadsheet creation as the ing first gained prominence, it referred to a new most widespread business application for per- way of organizing work: an ideal of centralizing sonal computers.1 By the end of that decade, the typing and transcription in the hands of spe- typewriter had been banished to the corner of cialists equipped with technologies such as auto- most offices, used only to fill out forms and matic typewriters. The word processing concept address envelopes. By the early 1990s, high-qual- was promoted by IBM to present its typewriter ity printers and powerful personal computers and dictating machine division as a comple- were a fixture in middle-class American house- ment to its “data processing” business. Within holds. Email, which emerged as another key the word processing center, automatic typewriters application for personal computers with the and dictating machines were rechristened word spread of the Internet in the mid-1990s, essen- processing machines, to be operated by word tially extended word processing technology to processing operators rather than secretaries or electronic message transmission. -
Computing the Cost of Copyright */ Programmers Fight 4Look and Feel' Lawsuits
l<L^r^- RICK FRIEDMAN-BLACK STAR Innovate don't litigate': Stallman and colleagues outside Lotus headquarters :••' •• ' .' TECHNOLOGY/' ;.:::'; : ' Computing the Cost of Copyright */ Programmers fight 4look and feel' lawsuits he Cambridge, Mass., protest was de-" Macs. Many software developers fear that cidedly different. These weren't the the Lotus win will make it harder to bring Tusual malcontents from Harvard or new products to market. So when protest Boston University; these were computer ers marched in front of Lotus's Cambridge programmers hewing picket signs. The en headquarters earlier this month, they emy: giant Lotus Development Corp., chanted with a sly reference to the hexa which is trying to protect the market lead decimal counting scheme that is a basic of its 1-2-3 software package by bringing tool of their trade: "look and feel" suits against look-alike 1-2-3A kick the lawsuits out the door competitors. Lotus had recently won its 5-6'7-8 innovate don't litigate first big victory against Paperback Soft 9-A-B-C interfaces should be free ware International, which has sold its VP D-E-F-0 look and feel has got to gol Planner for a fifth of 1-2-3's $495 list price. The group behind the protests is the. Copyright rules that worked fine for League for Programming Freedom, found books and paintings are now straining to ed by Richard Stallman, a software gum cover works from music videos to digital who recently got a $240,000 MacArthur audiotapes—and, increasingly, software. grant. Stallman says the suits stifle innova Paperback and other challengers believed tion, paving the way for Japan to take over that the interface that a program presents the industry. -
Excel 2010: Where It Came From
1 Excel 2010: Where It Came From In This Chapter ● Exploring the history of spreadsheets ● Discussing Excel’s evolution ● Analyzing why Excel is a good tool for developers A Brief History of Spreadsheets Most people tend to take spreadsheet software for granted. In fact, it may be hard to fathom, but there really was a time when electronic spreadsheets weren’t available. Back then, people relied instead on clumsy mainframes or calculators and spent hours doing what now takes minutes. It all started with VisiCalc The world’s first electronic spreadsheet, VisiCalc, was conjured up by Dan Bricklin and Bob Frankston back in 1978, when personal computers were pretty much unheard of in the office environment. VisiCalc was written for the Apple II computer, which was an interesting little machine that is something of a toy by today’s standards. (But in its day, the Apple II kept me mesmerized for days at aCOPYRIGHTED time.) VisiCalc essentially laid theMATERIAL foundation for future spreadsheets, and you can still find its row-and-column-based layout and formula syntax in modern spread- sheet products. VisiCalc caught on quickly, and many forward-looking companies purchased the Apple II for the sole purpose of developing their budgets with VisiCalc. Consequently, VisiCalc is often credited for much of the Apple II’s initial success. In the meantime, another class of personal computers was evolving; these PCs ran the CP/M operating system. A company called Sorcim developed SuperCalc, which was a spreadsheet that also attracted a legion of followers. 11 005_475355-ch01.indd5_475355-ch01.indd 1111 33/31/10/31/10 77:30:30 PMPM 12 Part I: Some Essential Background When the IBM PC arrived on the scene in 1981, legitimizing personal computers, VisiCorp wasted no time porting VisiCalc to this new hardware environment, and Sorcim soon followed with a PC version of SuperCalc. -
An Interview with DAN BRICKLIN and BOB FRANKSTON OH 402
An Interview with DAN BRICKLIN AND BOB FRANKSTON OH 402 Conducted by Martin Campbell-Kelly and Paul Ceruzzi on 7 May 2004 Needham, Massachusetts Charles Babbage Institute Center for the History of Information Technology University of Minnesota, Minneapolis Copyright, Charles Babbage Institute Dan Bricklin and Bob Frankston Interview 7 May 2004 Oral History 402 Abstract ABSTRACT: Dan Bricklin and Bob Frankston discuss the creation of VisiCalc, the pioneering spreadsheet application. Bricklin and Frankston begin by discussing their educational backgrounds and experiences in computing, especially with MIT’s Multics system. Bricklin then worked for DEC on typesetting and word-processing computers and, after a short time with a small start-up company, went to Harvard Business School. After MIT Frankston worked for White Weld and Interactive Data. The interview examines many of the technical, design, and programming choices in creating VisiCalc as well as interactions with Dan Fylstra and several business advisors. Bricklin comments on entries from his dated notebooks about these interactions. The interview reviews the incorporation of Software Arts in 1979, then describes early marketing of VisiCalc and the value of product evangelizing. There is discussion of rising competition from Mitch Kapor’s 1-2-3 and the steps taken by Fylstra’s software publishing company Personal Software (later VisiCorp). Part II of the interview begins with Bricklin and Frankston’s use of a Prime minicomputer to compile VisiCalc’s code for the Apple II computer. There is discussion of connections to Apple Computer and DEC, as well as publicity at the West Coast Computer Faire. The two evaluate the Fylstra essay, reviewing the naming of VisiCalc and discussing the division of labor between software developers and Fylstra as a software publisher. -
Antonio Tajani MEP President of the European Parliament [email protected]
Antonio Tajani MEP President of the European Parliament [email protected] 12 June 2018 Mr President, Article 13 of the EU Copyright Directive Threatens the Internet As a group of the Internet’s original architects and pioneers and their successors, we write to you as a matter of urgency about an imminent threat to the future of this global network. The European Commission’s proposal for Article 13 of the proposed Directive for Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive was well-intended. As creators ourselves, we share the concern that there should be a fair distribution of revenues from the online use of copyright works, that benefits creators, publishers, and platforms alike. But Article 13 is not the right way to achieve this. By requiring Internet platforms to perform automatic filtering all of the content that their users upload, Article 13 takes an unprecedented step towards the transformation of the Internet from an open platform for sharing and innovation, into a tool for the automated surveillance and control of its users. Europe has been served well by the balanced liability model established under the Ecommerce Directive, under which those who upload content to the Internet bear the principal responsibility for its legality, while platforms are responsible to take action to remove such content once its illegality has been brought to their attention. By inverting this liability model and essentially making platforms directly responsible for ensuring the legality of content in the first instance, the business models and investments of platforms large and small will be impacted. The damage that this may do to the free and open Internet as we know it is hard to predict, but in our opinions could be substantial. -
The Personal Computer, Past, Present and Future
The Personal Computer, Past, Present and Future The Personal Computer Past, Present and Future 2017/18 By Peter Farwell 1 The Personal Computer, Past, Present and Future Author’s Biography Peter Farwell Is a Chartered Professional Accountant and Certified Financial Analyst. He is uniquely positioned to write The Personal Computer, Past, Present and Future. Peter was an early purchaser of an Apple II and an avid user of VisiCalc. He is a retired partner of Public Accounting Firm Ernst & Young. He was the leader of the Canadian Firm’s services to the High Technology Industry for fourteen years. Peter was the co-author of several studies of the Canadian High Technology Industry. These included a study of trends in the Canadian Software Industry, conducted by interviewing 12 of the CEO’s of Canada’s leading Software companies. He coordinated the Canadian Electronic Industry’s participation in a four country, four industry study of Total Quality Management practices. 2 Peter has written articles and given speeches on aspects of Strategic Planning and Financing for High Technology companies. These included a lecture to the Association of Canadian Venture Capital Companies on the six stages of growth of technology companies, based on a 1972 landmark paper on the subject by Professor Greiner of Harvard University. Recently, in 2012 and 2013, he has coauthored three studies of Research In Motion that endeavor to determine its chances of survival and what changes management have to make to do so. 3 The Personal Computer, Past, Present and Future 4 The Personal Computer, Past, Present and Future Introduction This is a book about the Personal Computer, Its Past from 1975 to 2011, Its Present from 2011 to 2017 and its Future from 2018 . -
PC Software Workshop: Personal Productivity Software
PC Software Workshop: Personal Productivity Software Moderator: Doug Jerger Recorded: November 19, 2004 Mountain View, California CHM Reference number: X4601.2008 © 2004 Computer History Museum Table of Contents INTRODUCTIONS ........................................................................................................................4 A HISTORY OF T/MAKER............................................................................................................5 AN ASIDE ABOUT ROYAL MCBEE’S LGP-30 ..........................................................................10 BACK TO T/MAKER ...................................................................................................................11 THE SOFTWARE PUBLISHERS ASSOCIATION (SPA) AND INDUSTRY GROWING PAINS .............................................................................................................................14 BRØDERBUND SOFTWARE .....................................................................................................16 LIFETREE SOFTWARE .............................................................................................................22 NEED FOR VENTURE CAPITAL ...............................................................................................26 PC Software Workshop: Personal Productivity Software Conducted by Software History Center—Oral History Project Abstract: The participants examined Personal Productivity Software from the perspective of software vendors and developers; historians and members of -
Digital Media & Learning Conference
DIGITAL MEDIA & LEARNING CONFERENCE MARCH 1-3, 2012 // SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA DML2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS COMMITTEE & SPONSORS...............................5 OVERVIEW............................................................ 6 ABOUT THE THEME: BEYOND EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY.......6 CONFERENCE CHAIR & COMMITTEE ...................................7 KEYNOTES AND PLENARY PANELISTS ...............................9 CONFERENCE INFORMATION ..........................................12 CONFERENCE SCHEDULES & ABSTRACTS MARCH 1 ..................................................................13 MARCH 1 MOZILLA SCIENCE FAIR EXHIBITORS ...................24 MARCH 2 .................................................................27 MARCH 3 .................................................................39 CONFERENCE TRAVEL GUIDE & MAPS........55 3 BEYOND EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY 2012 DIGITAL MEDIA & LEARNING CONFERENCE Parc 55 Wyndham // San Francisco, California // March 1-3, 2012 CONFERENCE CHAIR Diana Rhoten CONFERENCE COMMITTEE Tracy Fullerton Re-imagining Media for Learning Chair Antero Garcia Innovations for Public Education Chair Jess Klein Democratizing Learning Innovation Co-Chair Mitch Resnick Making, Tinkering and Remixing Chair Mark Surman Democratizing Learning Innovation Chair KEYNOTE PRESENTERS John Seely Brown PLENARY PANELISTS Elizabeth Corcoran Mitch Kapor Ronaldo Lemos Vicki Phillips Leslie Redd Carina Wong Constance M. Yowell HOSTED BY THANKS TO OUR SPONSORS 5 CONFERENCE OVERVIEW The Digital Media and Learning Conference is an -
Module 2 Outils De Productivité Textuels
Aptitudes élémentaires en TIC - Module 2 Outils de productivité textuels Par Docteur Elijah I. Omwenga African Virtual university Université Virtuelle Africaine Universidade Virtual Africana Université Virtuelle Africaine 1 NOTE Ce document est publié sous les conditions de Droits d’auteur (Creative Commons) http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipédia:Droit_d'auteur Attribution Université Virtuelle Africaine 2 ;()3,+,:4(;0Ï9,: I. Aptitudes élémentaires en TIC - Module 2 Outils de productivité textuels _________________________________ 5 II. Pré requis ________________________________________________ 5 III. Temps ___________________________________________________ 6 IV. Matériels _________________________________________________ 6 V. Analyse du module _________________________________________ 8 VI. Contenu__________________________________________________ 9 6.1 Vue d’ensemble _________________________________________ 9 6.2 Plan __________________________________________________ 9 6.3 Organisateur graphique ___________________________________ 9 VII. Objectifs généraux ________________________________________ 10 VIII. Objectifs spécifiques d’apprentissage __________________________ 11 IX. Activité d’enseignement et d’apprentissage _____________________ 12 X. Concepts clés (glossaire) ___________________________________ 16 XI. Lectures obligatoires _______________________________________ 17 XII. Ressources obligatoires ____________________________________ 10 XIII. Liens pratiques ___________________________________________ 20 XIV. Activités d’apprentissage