The Situation of Korea Community Currency and the Activities of Hanbat LETS ______Kyunghee Chun
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
The situation of Korea Community Currency and the activities of Hanbat LETS _____________________________________________________________________________ Kyunghee Chun 1. Current situation of community currencies in Korea 1) Birth of community currencies in Korea The motive to create community currencies varies from economics reasons to the development of organizations, from the creation of the social safety net to the environmental preservation and from social movements to personal interests, but they are unanimous in the point that they try to transform the contemporary society(Lee, Chang-Woo, 2000). The community currency movement has economic characters(stimulation of the local economy, creation of a new market, increase of job opportunities and others), communitarian characters(such as the reevaluation of human activities and networking), ecological one such as the environmental preservation, on top of that of the social welfare and consumerist one(Lee, Deug-Eon, 2000). The strength of the community currency movement is, above all, that it is an “excellent social skill” in which inhabitants without money can satisfy their basic needs in their life. In the community currency system one does not need to give up although he/she is without cash, since he/she will be qualified to get services and/or goods from others within the community as a prize for a small favor to somebody else. Korea has the traditions of “Dure1” and “Pumasi2” as well as “kae” to help and take care mutually, so we can say that community currencies are a multilateral Pumasi in which our tradition has been reinvented as a modern system in accordance to our reality today. In other words, community currencies are a modern representation of barter, a long tradition of Korea. Community currencies were introduced for the first time in Korea in 1996 when the magazine “Nok-saek Pyeong-non”(Green Review) published an article about the relationship between the community and money(Barbara Brant?(1996), Patricia Nox & Nick England? (1996)) where LETS, a system of community currency, was depicted. And two years later, in March 1998, “the Gathering of those who gaze at the Future”(Minaisa Club) started Future Money, the first community currency in Korea. This period coincided with the most hard domination of IMF’s monetary relief regime, community currencies were regarded as an alternative economic movement to cope with the economic crisis, there was a huge interest from newspapers, broadcasting stations and NGOs, and these currencies were presented as one of the policies to rescue the unemployed. There is a consideration that it would have been very difficult for community currencies to be introduced and diffused so quickly in Korea without the IMF regime. 2) The development of community currencies in Korea 1 Both “Dure”(두두) and “Pumasi”(두두두) stands for the mutual help of farm work, and Pumasi is used to refer to a LETS system too(such as Gojan Pumasi). 2 Kae is a credit union in which a meeting is held periodically and participants(especially woman) pay a certain amount of money so that one in the group can take the whole amount. The first community currency in Korea was organized by Minaisa Club followed by the “Buddhist Academy for Ecological Awakening,” “Inchon3 Information and Communication Education Center(IICEC)” at Inha University, Incheon, Gyeonggi-do, “Skill and Technology Bank” at the attached integral social welfare center of Chung-ang University, Seoul, “Gwanak Local Currency” in Seoul, “Taebaek Local Currency” at Taebaek, Gwangwon-do, “Local Pumasi” at IICEC, “Small Market” by the publishing house “Small is Beautiful,” “Mindlle 4 Educational Currency” at Mindlle, a publishing house on education and other community currencies. Similar systems were also implemented at the Daegu Rotary Club and Guri YMCA too. There were also initiatives by local governments, such as “Songpa Money” at Songpa Pumashi, Songpa-gu Volunteer Center, Seoul, “Welfare Pumasi” at Tonggu Office, Daegu, another one at the Anyang City Hall Volunteer Center, Gyonggi-do and others(Pak Yong-nam, 2001). On top of that “Encounter LETS” at Jinju, Gyeongsangnam-do, “Green Money System Love” by the Green Network, “Sharing” at Gwangju, Chungcheongnam-do were implemented as well as initiatives by the Promotion Headquarter of Green Money in Busan, by the Cheongju City Hall, by the Foreign Workers’ Center of Ansan, Gyonggi-do and others. There was 31 community currency systems according to the “Workshop to stimulate local currencies” which was held in November 2001 in Seoul by Minaisa Club and Buddhist Academy for Ecological Awakening. But ordinary people and media lost their interest in community currencies after Korea got over the IMF regime(Lee, Changwoo, 2002) and today the Future Money by Minaisa Club, the “Small Market,” Green Money System Love,” “Hanbat LETS” and others are still alive(So, Byeongcheol and You, Chang-soo, 2004). The first pedagogical currency “Mindlle” is now suspended as well as “Jeonju Pumasi” and many other community currencies(So, Byeongcheol and You, Chang-soo, 2004). Taebaek community currency and another project at the Community Activation Center, Chunggu, Daegu are also suspended currently, the Dure at the Buddhist Academy for Ecological Awakening stopped its operation when the person in charge quitted in early 2001, and the pumasi at Anyang Voluntter Center also gave up its service in 2001. Some are still operational but not growing. Minaisa still keeps its operation and Gwanak local currency, although still alive, is not successful in activating transactions as the management became sloppy when the person in charge left and the administrative committee was in charge of the operation. On the other hand the increase of insolvents and umployment raised people’s awareness on social welfare, people were once again interested in community currencies, some supports for community currencies are available both in submunicipal(such as Gwacheon Pumasi in Gwacheon and Gojan Money at Ansan which started in June 2002) and municipal(such as Gwangmyeong Geuru in Gwangmyeong and Neulpum at Daegu) level. A new community currency was established in 2004 in Busan and a foundation seminar for the community currency movement was held on April 22, 2005 mainly by the Bondong Welfare House, Dalseo-gu, Daegu under the auspices of the Social Welfare Common Funds. 3) Korean community currencies today Most community currencies in Korea are LETS-style because this movement began when a LETS was introduced there, and Time Dollar was introduced when “Love Ring” started at 3 This article has two spellings for the same place name “두두,” now famous for Korea’s biggest international airport: It is transcribed to Incheon according to the current Roman transcription system, defined by the Korean Ministry of Culture and Tourism in 2000, but the spelling “Inchon”(without e) is used at IICEC’s official site, presumably due to the fact that different spelling systems were already available by then.. 4 “Mindlle”(두두두) means “dandelion” in Korean. Gumi, Gyeongsangbuk-do, today with some local governments running this mutual help system in the form of the Resource Volunteer Bank. There are more than 10 active community currency groups in Korea, such as Future Money of Minaisa Club, Mindlle Educational Currency, the Small Market, Songpa Money, Gwacheon Pumasi, Ansan Pumasi, Gumi Love Ring Bank, Local Pumasi Gwangmyeong Geuru and Daegu Local Currency Neulpum. Graphic 1: The current status of Korean community currencies Characteristi System name Operated by Currency’s name Introduced in cs Minaisa FM Minaisa Club Future Money May 1998 Non-profit Mindlle Publishing Educational House Mindlle January 1999 Non-profit Money “Mindlle” Seocho office, Seocho Pumasi Green Money February 1999 Local gov’t Seoul Green Alliance Small Market None March 1999 Non-profit Publishing Local Help Welfare Songpa Help Center(establi Songpa Pumasi Money August 1999 Welfare Center shed by the Ward and run privately) Dongjak Help Dongjak Help November Welfare Center, None Local gov’t Welfare Bank 1999 Seoul 5Hanbat LETS Inhabitants Duru February 2000 Civilian Gwacheon November Inhabitants Ari Civilian Pumasi 2000 Ansan Gojan Gojan 1-Dong Pumasi Office, Ansan Gojan Money June 2002 Civilian Gumi Love Gumi John Ring Center Gori August 2002 Non-profit Local Pumasi Gwangmyeong Gwangmyeong Lifelong Study Guru March 2004 Local gov’t Geuru Center Integral Social Daegu Local Welfare Center, Currency Neulpum April 2005 Local gov’t Dalseo-gu, Neulpum Daegu 5 Translator’s note: it means “universally, generally.” 6 Translator’s note: it means “ring.” Most community currencies in Korea were established by the will of community members who run them, but some were set up mainly with the help of local governments which evaluate its motive and significance. Each group is active in different geographical area with different community currency name and monetary unit. They gathered the “National Gathering of Community Currency Movement Network KOREA”(NGCCMN Korea) based on the “Hanbat LETS 5 Anniversary Commemorative Seminar” which took place in Daejeon in November 2005 to share each other’s information and to discuss difficulties in operation. Graphic 1 shows details on the current operational status of recently-active community currencies in Korea. I will depict mainly those group who took part in NGCCMN Korea which was held twice on September 27thth and October 7th, 2005. 4) Characteristics of Korean community currencies Some characteristics can be found on studying Korean community currencies. First of all, they emerged in the period of IMF crisis like in most other community currencies who came into existence in the time of economic depression as a relatively-new social movement in the 20st century. Some community currencies take the form of Time Dollar or Hours, but the most popular one is LETS. Korea has both LETS and Time Dollars, Gumi Love Ring and Dongjak Help Welfare Bank as Time Dollar make use of volunteers’ time with community currency while in most other cases people share different lifestyles with the community in LETS.