DOCSLIB.ORG

South Yadkin River Huc 01

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
South Yadkin River Huc 01 BASINWIDE ASSESSMENT REPORT YADKIN RIVER BASIN NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES Division of Water Quality Environmental Sciences Section April 2007 This page was intentionally left blank NCDENR, Division of Water Quality Basinwide Assessment Report - Yadkin River Basin - April 2006 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF APPENDICIES ........................................................................................................................4 LIST OF TABLES...................................................................................................................................5 LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................5 BASIN DESCRIPTION...........................................................................................................................6 YADKIN RIVER HUC 03040101 – YADKIN RIVER HEADWATERS ...................................................8 Description......................................................................................................................................8 Overview of Water Quality............................................................................................................10 River and Stream Assessment.....................................................................................................14 YADKIN RIVER HUC 03040102 – SOUTH YADKIN RIVER ..............................................................16 Description....................................................................................................................................16 Overview Of Water Quality ...........................................................................................................17 River And Stream Assessment.....................................................................................................18 YADKIN RIVER HUC 03040103 - YADKIN RIVER.............................................................................20 Description....................................................................................................................................20 Overview of Water Quality............................................................................................................21 River and Stream Assessment.....................................................................................................22 YADKIN RIVER HUC 03040104 – LAKE TILLERY/PEE DEE RIVER................................................25 Description....................................................................................................................................25 Overview of Water Quality............................................................................................................26 River and Stream Assessment.....................................................................................................27 YADKIN RIVER HUC 03040105 - ROCKY RIVER .............................................................................29 Description....................................................................................................................................29 Overview of Water Quality............................................................................................................30 River and Stream Assessment.....................................................................................................32 YADKIN RIVER HUC 03040201 – PEE DEE RIVER..........................................................................34 Description....................................................................................................................................34 Overview of Water Quality............................................................................................................35 River and Stream Assessment.....................................................................................................37 GLOSSARY .........................................................................................................................................38 NCDENR, Division of Water Quality Basinwide Assessment Report - Yadkin River Basin - April 2006 3 LIST OF APPENDICIES Appendix Page B-1 Summary of benthic macroinvertebrate data, sampling methods, and criteria..............................39 F-1 Fish community sampling methods and criteria.............................................................................52 F-2 A summary of fish community assessment data ...........................................................................58 F-3 Fish community data collected from the Yadkin River basin, 1992 – 2006...................................63 F-4 Fish community metric values from 83 wadeable streams in the Yadkin River basinwide monitoring program, 2006.............................................................................................68 F-5 Fish distributional records for the Yadkin River basin....................................................................70 F-6 Habitat evaluations and stream and riparian habitats at 83 fish community monitoring sites in the Yadkin River basin, 2006.............................................................................................72 F-7 Water quality at 83 fish community sites in the Yadkin River basin, 2006 ....................................81 F-8 Flow measurement and flow conditions in the Yadkin River basin................................................84 F-9 Web links........................................................................................................................................92 F-10 Fish community references............................................................................................................93 NCDENR, Division of Water Quality Basinwide Assessment Report - Yadkin River Basin - April 2006 4 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Waterbodies monitored in Yadkin River Headwaters HUC 03040101 in the Yadkin River basin for basinwide assessment, 2001 and 2006 ................................................................ 10 2. Waterbodies monitored in South Yadkin River HUC 03040102 in the Yadkin River basin for basinwide assessment, 2001 and 2006.......................................................................... 17 3. Waterbodies monitored in Yadkin River HUC 03040103 in the Yadkin Basin for basinwide assessment, 2001 and 2006 ........................................................................................ 22 4. Waterbodies monitored in Lake Tillery/Pee Dee River HUC 03040104 in the Yadkin River basin for basinwide assessment, 2001 and 2006 ................................................................ 26 5. Waterbodies monitored in Rocky River HUC 03040105 in the Yadkin River basin for basinwide assessment, 2001 and 2006 ................................................................................... 30 6. Major NPDES permitted dischargers in HUC 03040201............................................................... 33 7. Waterbodies monitored in Pee Dee River HUC 03040201 in the Yadkin River basin for basinwide assessment, 2001 and 2006 ................................................................................... 34 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Geographical relationships of the Yadkin River basin in North Carolina. ........................................6 2. Sampling sites in HUC 03040101 in the Yadkin River basin...........................................................8 3. Sampling sites in HUC 03040102 in the Yadkin River basin.........................................................16 4. Sampling sites in HUC 03040103 in the Yadkin River basin.........................................................20 5. Sampling sites in HUC 03040104 in the Yadkin River basin.........................................................24 6. Sampling sites in HUC 03040105 in the Yadkin River basin.........................................................29 7. Sampling sites in HUC 03040201 in the Yadkin River basin.........................................................33 NCDENR, Division of Water Quality Basinwide Assessment Report - Yadkin River Basin - April 2006 5 BASIN DESCRIPTION The Yadkin River basin is the second largest basin in North Carolina and covers approximately 7,213 square miles and spans 21 counties (Figure 1). Originating on the eastern slopes of the Blue Ridge Mountains in Caldwell and Wilkes counties, the Yadkin River flows northeasterly for about 100 miles and then turns southeast until it joins the Uwharrie River to form the Pee Dee River. The Pee Dee River continues its southeast course to the North Carolina-South Carolina border and then precedes its flow through the heart of South Carolina before emptying to Winyah Bay (Figure 1). Figure 1. Geographical relationships of the Yadkin River basin. As would be expected for such a large river basin, there are numerous subecoregions encountered here. The mountain ecoregions includes the Southern Crystalline Ridges and Mountains, and the Eastern Blue Ridge Foothills (Griffith et al. 2002). Within the piedmont ecoregions, the subecoregions of the Northern Inner Piedmont, the Triassic Uplands, the Sauratown Mountains, the Southern Outer Piedmont and the Carolina Slate Belt are found (Griffith et al. 2002). The lower portion of this basin also includes a small NCDENR, Division of Water Quality Basinwide Assessment Report - Yadkin River Basin
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aquatic Ecosystems
    February 19, 2014 Nantahala and Pisgah NFs Assessment Aquatic Ecosystems The overall richness of North Carolina’s aquatic fauna is directly related to the geomorphology of the state, which defines the major drainage divisions and the diversity of habitats found within. There are seventeen major river basins in North Carolina. Five western basins are part of the Interior Basin (IB) and drain to the Mississippi River and the Gulf of Mexico (Hiwassee, Little Tennessee, French Broad, Watauga, and New). Parts of these five river basins are within the Nantahala and Pisgah National Forests (NFs). Twelve central and eastern basins are part of the Atlantic Slope (AS) and flow to the Atlantic Ocean. Of these twelve central and eastern basins, parts of the Savannah, Broad, Catawba, and Yadkin-Pee Dee basins are within the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs. As described later in this report, the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs, for the most part, support higher elevation coldwater streams, and relatively little cool- and warmwater resources. To gain perspective on the importance of aquatic ecosystems on the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs, it is first necessary to understand their value at regional and national scales. The southeastern United States has the highest aquatic species diversity in the entire United States (Burr and Mayden 1992; Williams et al. 1993; Taylor et al. 1996; Warren et al. 2000,), with southeastern fishes comprising 62% of the United States fauna, and nearly 50% of the North American fish fauna (Burr and Mayden 1992). Freshwater mollusk diversity in the southeast is ‘globally unparalleled’, representing 91% of all United States mussel species (Neves et al.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Duke Energy Progress Lake Tillery Shoreline Management Plan
    CD-5 APPENDIX CD – 5 Duke Energy Progress Lake Tillery Shoreline Management Plan I-2 Yadkin-Pee Dee Hydroelectric Project No. 2206 Lake Tillery Shoreline Management Plan Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. December 19, 2011 I-3 I-4 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................. v 1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Project Area Description.......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Operations and License Requirements ........................................................ 3 1.3 Purpose and Goals ................................................................................................... 3 1.4 History of the Shoreline Management Plan ............................................................. 4 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES .................................................................. 5 2.1 Water Quality ........................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Aquatic Resources ................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Terrestrial Wildlife Resources ................................................................................. 6 2.4 Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species and Special Natural Communities ....... 7 2.5 Nonnative Aquatic Vegetation
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT MORT, SANDRA AMISS. Mass Spectrometric Methods for The
    ABSTRACT MORT, SANDRA AMISS. Mass Spectrometric Methods for the Determination of PCB Congeners for Environmental Risk Assessment. (Under the direction of Dr. W. Gregory Cope and Dr. Damian Shea). Our research provides important advances in the evaluation of alternative, cost effective analytical systems for polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) risk assessment of environmental matrices. This type of evaluation has previously been limited by a reluctance on the part of regulators, site owners and investigators, to specify U.S. EPA Method 1668, the 209-PCB congener analysis recommended for environmental media, including biota, water, sediments and soils. U.S. EPA Method 1668 specifies a high-resolution gas chromatography / high- resolution mass spectrometry detection system (HRGC/HRMS) that is of limited availability in both federal and state environmental regulatory agency laboratories, as well as in contract environmental laboratories. This leads to a high cost for 209-PCB congener analysis and a reluctance to require it for environmental risk assessment. While additional validation is needed, this research indicates that low resolution tandem mass spectrometry (LRMSMS) gas chromatography systems provide adequate PCB congener resolution and detection sensitivity to provide robust data for environmental risk assessment of weathered (i.e., degraded) PCB contamination. Our results provide additional support for the need for 209-PCB congener- specific analyses to thoroughly assess the environmental risks associated with abiotic weathered PCB sources, or to define food web component specific PCB burdens and predator, and ultimately, human risks. Based on observations of waterbody, species and trophic guild specific PCB congener profiles in fish collected from four waterbodies of the Yadkin-Pee Dee River system of North Carolina, alternative human health risk assessment methods suggest that some North Carolina sub-populations ingesting fish from the four Yadkin-Pee Dee waterbodies may not be adequately protected from the potential for increased cancer risks by the N.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Supply & Wastewater
    Piedmont Triad Climate Resiliency Tool Kit Water Supply & Wastewater Introduction Water is a scarce natural resource in the Piedmont region. As the Piedmont Triad continues to grow and develop, and the demand for potable water increases, it has become increasingly important to monitor the surface water capacity available to fulfill our regional water demand. Short-term solutions to water issues are generally quick and necessary steps in reaction to immediate concerns. However, a long-term planning approach will better prepare local governments for the unique challenges facing our region. Investment in a deeper understanding of the complex and challenging political, regulatory, and environmental issues surrounding water supply will help guide decision-makers to consider future ramifications of options in resource planning. This assessment of current and future (20-50 years) water resource needs and wastewater treatment plant capacity includes the 12-county Piedmont Triad Regional Council (PTRC) Region (Alamance, Caswell, Davidson, Davie, Forsyth, Guilford, Montgomery, Randolph, Rockingham, Stokes, Surry, and Yadkin Counties). Water supply and wastewater capacity are assessed within the context of surface water availability, projected population growth, geography, current laws and regulations, water quality, and patterns of water use (water conservation and water reuse). Background Drinking water comes from two primary sources, surface water or groundwater. Surface water is the water found above ground in the form of rainwater runoff, streams, rivers, lakes and reservoirs. Groundwater is unseen and deep in the ground saturating porous sandy soils or fractures of bedrock. Surface water and groundwater affect each other. Groundwater comes to the surface (springs) and can help replenish surface water.
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina Department of Natural Resources
    FOREWORD Abundant fish and wildlife, unbroken coastal vistas, miles of scenic rivers, swamps and mountains open to exploration, and well-tended forests and fields…these resources enhance the quality of life that makes South Carolina a place people want to call home. We know our state’s natural resources are a primary reason that individuals and businesses choose to locate here. They are drawn to the high quality natural resources that South Carolinians love and appreciate. The quality of our state’s natural resources is no accident. It is the result of hard work and sound stewardship on the part of many citizens and agencies. The 20th century brought many changes to South Carolina; some of these changes had devastating results to the land. However, people rose to the challenge of restoring our resources. Over the past several decades, deer, wood duck and wild turkey populations have been restored, striped bass populations have recovered, the bald eagle has returned and more than half a million acres of wildlife habitat has been conserved. We in South Carolina are particularly proud of our accomplishments as we prepare to celebrate, in 2006, the 100th anniversary of game and fish law enforcement and management by the state of South Carolina. Since its inception, the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources (SCDNR) has undergone several reorganizations and name changes; however, more has changed in this state than the department’s name. According to the US Census Bureau, the South Carolina’s population has almost doubled since 1950 and the majority of our citizens now live in urban areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Recreational Use Assessment
    Alcoa Power Generating Inc. Yadkin Division Yadkin Project Relicensing (FERC No. 2197) Recreational Use Assessment Draft Report December 2004 Prepared by ERM TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................... ES-i 1.0 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................1 2.0 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................3 2.1 Data Collection...........................................................................................3 2.1.1 Spot Counts......................................................................................5 2.1.2 Visitor Use Surveys.........................................................................7 2.1.3 Tailwater Use Survey.....................................................................10 2.1.4 Canoe/Kayak Registry...................................................................11 2.1.5 Resident Use Survey......................................................................11 2.1.6 Private Community Use Survey.....................................................13 2.1.7 Business and Organization Survey ................................................15 2.1.8 Uwharrie National Forest Survey ..................................................16 2.1.9 Aerial Photographs.........................................................................16 2.2 Recreational Use Data Analysis..............................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • A List of Common and Scientific Names of Fishes from the United States And
    t a AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY QL 614 .A43 V.2 .A 4-3 AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY Special Publication No. 2 A List of Common and Scientific Names of Fishes -^ ru from the United States m CD and Canada (SECOND EDITION) A/^Ssrf>* '-^\ —---^ Report of the Committee on Names of Fishes, Presented at the Ei^ty-ninth Annual Meeting, Clearwater, Florida, September 16-18, 1959 Reeve M. Bailey, Chairman Ernest A. Lachner, C. C. Lindsey, C. Richard Robins Phil M. Roedel, W. B. Scott, Loren P. Woods Ann Arbor, Michigan • 1960 Copies of this publication may be purchased for $1.00 each (paper cover) or $2.00 (cloth cover). Orders, accompanied by remittance payable to the American Fisheries Society, should be addressed to E. A. Seaman, Secretary-Treasurer, American Fisheries Society, Box 483, McLean, Virginia. Copyright 1960 American Fisheries Society Printed by Waverly Press, Inc. Baltimore, Maryland lutroduction This second list of the names of fishes of The shore fishes from Greenland, eastern the United States and Canada is not sim- Canada and the United States, and the ply a reprinting with corrections, but con- northern Gulf of Mexico to the mouth of stitutes a major revision and enlargement. the Rio Grande are included, but those The earlier list, published in 1948 as Special from Iceland, Bermuda, the Bahamas, Cuba Publication No. 1 of the American Fisheries and the other West Indian islands, and Society, has been widely used and has Mexico are excluded unless they occur also contributed substantially toward its goal of in the region covered. In the Pacific, the achieving uniformity and avoiding confusion area treated includes that part of the conti- in nomenclature.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Ecology and Habitat Preference of the Leopard Darter, Percina Pantherina
    REPRODUCTIVE ECOLOGY AND HABITAT PREFERENCE OF THE LEOPARD DARTER, PERCINA PANTHERINA By PAUL WILLIAM /~AMES Bachelor of Science University of Kansas Lawrence, Kansas 1981 ·4::er of Science ...1.issouri State University 3pringfield, Missouri 1983 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the·Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY July, 1989 . - ~· ,• ) "' Oklahoma State Univ. Lihra1 REPRODUCTIVE ECOLOGY AND HABITAT PREFERENCE OF THE LEOPARD DARTER, PERCINA PANTHERINA Thesis Approved: ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank my advisor, Dr. o. Eugene Maughan, for giving me the opportunity to work on this project and for his encouragement throughout my graduate program. I would also like to thank the members of my graduate committee, Dr. William A. Drew, Dr. Anthony A. Echelle, Dr. Rudolph J. Miller, and Dr. Alexander v. Zale, for their professional and personal advice throughout the course of the study. I wish to extend my sincere gratitude to the u. s. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation, and the Oklahoma Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit for providing financial and technical support for the study. I am especially grateful to Mr. Frank James of the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation's McCurtain County Wilderness Area for his friendship and hospitality during extended field trips. A sincere thanks goes to Rick Horton, Steve O'Donnell, and Todd Phillips for their help in the field and laboratory. A special thanks goes to Stuart Leon for helping with the development of many of the field and data analysis techniques used in this study.
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL FORESTS Forest Service Celebrates Weeks
    2011 Recreation Guide to the National Forests in North Carolina www.fs.usda.gov/nfsnc Forest Service celebrates Weeks Act PHOTO BY MARY NOEL From the Blue Ridge Parkway’s Green Knob Overlook, drivers can view the Burke-McDowell Tract, the first land purchased for eastern national for- ests through the 1911 Weeks Act. Known as the Curtis Creek tract, the land is part of the Grandfather Ranger District of Pisgah National Forest. which solidified ownership with one A century of entity and allowed the government to buy the land without a cloud on conservation: the title. Over the last 100 years, North 1911-2011 Carolina has become home to the by Mary Noel Nantahala, Pisgah, Uwharrie and magine if no national forests Croatan national forests, which existed in North Carolina. encompass more than 1.2 million This was reality in the early acres — about 4 percent of North 20th century. Early national Carolina’s land. forests in the West were These North Carolina national Iestablished from public lands by forest lands now include: 1909. However, the U.S. government l 11 congressionally designated needed to purchase land from wilderness areas. private landowners if national forests PHOTO COURTESY OF FOREST SERVICE l Three research experimental were to exist in the East. THE LANDS NOBODY WANTED: Most lands acquired in the early 1900’s were stripped of trees and excessively eroded from farming. forests (Bent Creek, Coweeta and With strong public support, the Blue Valley) Weeks Act became law on March 1, a price of just over $7 per acre. Later often had only a general idea of l Three National Wild and Scenic 1911, under the leadership of Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Stanly County Land Use Plan
    STANLY COUNTY SECTION 1: AN INTRODUCTION TO THE STANLY COUNTY LAND USE PLAN Introduction to the Final Report This revision of the Land Use Plan for Stanly County updates the 2002 Land Use Analysis and Development Plan that was prepared for the Board of Commissioners by the County Planning Board and County Planning Department. While the 1977 and 2002 plans provided an adequate planning and infrastructure decision-making tool for county officials and the public, changes in county development patterns necessitate an update. Stanly County and the rest of the Yadkin-Pee Dee Lakes region have a reputation as a place of wonderful natural beauty, from the lakes and rivers of eastern Stanly County, to the “rolling Kansas” district of Millingport, to the Uwharrie Mountains near Morrow Mountain State Park. The steady rise in population over the years verifies Stanly County’s livability and reputation as an excellent place to live, work, and play. The county remains one of the leading agricultural counties in North Carolina. The agricultural economy was for decades augmented by a strong industrial sector based on the textile and aluminum industries, among others. In addition, tourism has emerged as an important industry for the county. Today Stanly County lies at the edge of the growing Charlotte metropolitan region, a region that now extends into Cabarrus and Union Counties, both of which share Stanly County’s western border. While indications are already apparent that parts of western Stanly County are experiencing increased development activity, it is expected that major infrastructure projects— among them the completion of the eastern leg of the Interstate 485 Charlotte by-pass, and the widening of NC 24/27 to four lanes from the county line to Albemarle—will speed the rate of development and growth in the county.
    [Show full text]
  • The Elkin Valley—MST Segment 6
    1 | Mountains-to-Sea Trail Last Updated 4/14/2020 Walking the MST into Elkin Photo by Joe Mickey The Elkin Valley—MST Segment 6 DEVILS GARDEN OVERLOOK TO PILOT MOUNTAIN STATE PARK By Bob Hillyer This 69-mile segment marks the transition from mountains to Piedmont as the trail drops more than 2,000 feet in six miles off the Blue Ridge Park- way (BRP) to a tranquil valley within Stone Mountain State Park. At the base of the massive granite monolith that gives the park its name, hikers enter a gentler landscape at the Hutchinson Historic Homestead. From there, the journey continues a more gradual descent, over foot- hills and past farms and forests to the town of Elkin. The flora, fauna, Segment 6 | 2 and wildlife also make a noticeable transition. Yellow-pine forests begin to dominate the landscape along fields of corn and tobacco and trellised grapes at wineries. Once a textile powerhouse, Elkin welcomes visitors to explore its downtown as well as its proud history and beautiful setting on the Yadkin River. From Elkin, the trail heads east, following the Yadkin River, past farms and forests to the historic village of Rockford, the county seat of Surry County from 1789 to 1850. Ahead looms the granite dome of Pilot Mountain, the westernmost peak in the Sauratown Mountain range. This MST segment ends at the start of the Corridor Trail in Pilot Mountain State Park, which in Segment 7 leads hikers toward that peak. Two of the trail sections in this segment are also open to horses.
    [Show full text]
  • Power and Populations in the North Carolina Backcountry
    Journal of Backcountry Studies People of Desperate Fortune: Power and Populations in the North Carolina Backcountry BY JOSHUA LEE MCKAUGHAN Between the late 1740’s and the outbreak of the American Revolution, the western half of North Carolina underwent a rapid change from sparsely inhabited frontier to an area containing nearly one half of the colony’s population. To one period observer, these were merely “people of desperate fortune…without any property” hoping to exchange one “best poor man’s country” for another.1 Hoping to acquire sufficient acreage so that they and their children might achieve “competency” – or economic independence – these migrants sought to make the most of the opportunity offered by Carolina’s cheap fertile land. The farms they established commonly focused on subsistence crops and home industry. For many, the marketplace was a distant force to be tapped only for the goods that they or their neighbors desired but could not produce on their own.2 However, as European demand for wheat increased during the 1750’s, the back settlers responded to the market stimulus not only through their crop choices, but by increasing their petitions for improved connections to market areas. The more enterprising frontiersmen also added the labor of African and African-American slaves to that of their families in an attempt to not only increase their production of staples, but to increase their personal power and prestige – perhaps even to free themselves for officeholding and other pursuits. With this, the Backcountry grew to reflect eastern values – albeit on a rather more modest scale. The same blending of Backcountry and tidewater traditions found in the growing awareness of the market and slavery was no less conspicuous in the efforts of some back settlers to move up in the world.
    [Show full text]