The Romances for Violin and Piano by Robert and Clara Schumann: a Comparison and Contextualization
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The Romances for Violin and Piano by Robert and Clara Schumann: A Comparison and Contextualization A document submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Musical Arts in the Performance Studies Division of the College-Conservatory of Music Violin 2018 by Ah Rhim Lim M.M., University of Cincinnati, College-Conservatory of Music, 2014 B.M., Chung-Nam National University, 2011 Committee Chair: Catherine Lees, DMA ABSTRACT The purpose of this document is to compare and contrast the compositional style of Robert and Clara Schumann through a detailed exploration of similar sets of music: Robert Schumann’s Three Romances, Op. 94 for violin and piano and Clara Schumann’s Three Romances, Op. 22, for violin and piano. Robert’s Op. 94 was originally composed for oboe and piano but published for violin and clarinet as well. I will explore similarities and differences between these works, the nature in which they relate to each composers’ romance style, and the relation to other composers’ violin romances in the nineteenth century by Ludwig van Beethoven, Camille Saint-Saëns, Max Bruch, Antonín Dvorák, Gabriel Fauré, and Johann Svendsen. ii Copyright © 2018, Ah Rhim Lim iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my deepest appreciation to Professor Timothy Lees, Doctor Catharine Lees, Doctor Won-Bin Yim, and Professor Yehuda Hanani. I cannot thank them enough for their valuable advice and guidance. I am also grateful for all of my loving family, friends, colleagues, and students with whom I have shared experiences throughout this adventure. I also would like to thank Breitkopf and Härtel for granting permission to use the musical examples for this study. I especially thank my mother, Jung Suk Lee, for all the constant prayers, warm encouragement, and unconditional support. Without her love, patience, and sacrifice towards me, I would not be where I am today. I truly appreciate her for standing by my side and cheering me to reach for the stars. Soli Deo gloria! iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv LIST OF FIGURES vi LIST OF MUSICAL EXAMPLES vii INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1. Romance and Hausmusik 5 2. Robert Schumann’s Three Romances for Violin and Piano, Op. 94 9 Context and Musical Analysis 14 3. Clara Schumann’s Three Romances for Violin and Piano, Op. 22 25 Context and Musical Analysis 28 4. Conclusion: A Comparison of Robert’s Op. 94 and Clara’s Op. 22 within the context of the Nineteenth-Century Violin Romance 45 The Violin Romance in the Nineteenth Century 52 BIBLIOGRAPHY 62 v LIST OF TABLES Chapter 2 Table 1: Piano Romances composed by Robert Schumann in 1839 9 Table 2: Lieder and Romances composed by Robert Schumann in 1840 10 Table 3: Choral Partsong Romances composed by Robert Schumann 12 Table 4: Instrumental Chamber Music composed by Robert Schumann in 1849 13 Table 5: Sectional divisions in the Drei Romanzen, Op. 94 14 Chapter 3 Table 6: Romances composed by Clara Schumann 27 Table 7: Sectional Divisions in the Drei Romanzen, Op. 22 28 Table 8: Ternary formal divisions in Clara’s Romance No. 3, Op. 22 30 vi LIST OF MUSICAL EXAMPLES Chapter 2 Example 1: Romance No. 2, Op. 94, mm. 1–5. 18 Example 2: Romance No. 3, Op. 94, mm. 8–12. 18 Example 3: Romance No. 2, Op. 94, mm. 8–16. 19 Example 4: Romance No. 1, Op. 94, mm. 9–15. 22 Example 5: Romance No. 2, Op. 94, mm. 26–31. 23 Chapter 3 Example 6: Romance No. 3, Op. 22, mm. 28–32. 32 Example 7: Romance No. 2, Op. 22, mm. 14–19. 33 Example 8: Romance No. 1, Op. 22, mm. 1–6. 34 Example 9: Romance No. 2, Op. 22, mm. 39–46. 34 Example 10: Romance No. 3, Op. 22, mm. 1–8. 35 Example 11: Romance No. 3, Op. 22, mm. 42–49 36 Example 12: Romance No. 2, Op. 22, mm. 39–46. 37 Example 13: Romance No. 2, Op. 22, mm. 36–39. 38 Example 14: Romance No. 2, Op. 22, mm. 91–95. 38 Example 15: Romance No. 3, Op. 22, mm. 38–41. 39 Example 16: Romance No. 2, Op. 22, mm. 102–105. 39 Example 17: Romance No. 3, Op. 22, mm. 104–106. 40 Example 18: Romance No. 2, Op. 22, mm. 22–23. 41 vii Example 19: Romance No. 2, Op. 22, mm. 31–34. 41 Example 20: Romance No. 1, Op. 22, mm. 24–25. 42 Chapter 4 Example 21: Clara’s Romance No. 2, Op. 22, mm. 129–136. 49 Example 22: Beethoven’s Romance, Op. 40, mm. 33–48. 53 Example 23: Beethoven’s Romance, Op. 50, mm. 1–4. 54 Example 24: Dvorák’s Romance, Op. 11, mm. 87–94. 57 Example 25: Fauré’s Romance, Op. 28, mm. 123–132. 58 Example 26: Svendsen’s Romance, Op. 26, mm. 45–52. 60 viii Introduction The purpose of this document is to compare and contrast the compositional styles of Robert Schumann and Clara Schumann through a detailed examination of their Op. 94 and Op. 22 romances and to contextualize these compositions within the nineteenth- century violin romance genre. The goal of this comparison is to contrast their compositional styles and also to relate these pieces to the genre of instrumental romance, a genre they significantly helped to define and develop. In order to contextualize these pieces within the genre it will be necessary to provide a detailed history of the development of the romance in both its vocal and instrumental incarnations from the late eighteenth century into the middle of the nineteenth century. Taking as a starting point that the instrumental romance is a non-virtuosic, lyrical, and accessible compositional vehicle related to its vocal romance cousin and suitable for Hausmusik, this document will explore how the Schumanns both helped to define the genre of instrumental romance and how this genre evolved and changed. (This discussion will include other romances composed by Robert and Clara Schumann as well as the concept of Hausmusik.) In my detailed examinations of Robert’s Op. 94 and Clara’s Op. 22 (chapters two and three), I will define their individual romance style by specifically exploring the formal structures, phrasing, melodic writing, harmonic language, texture (especially the nature of the combination of solo instrument and piano accompaniment), and rhythm. In the final chapter, I will provide the results of the comparison between these two composers’ romance styles and then situate these pieces within the context of other nineteenth-century violin romances by Beethoven (Op. 40 and 50), Saint-Saëns (Op. 48), Bruch (Op. 42), Dvorák (Op. 11), Fauré (Op. 28), and Svendsen (Op. 26). At the heart of 1 this discussion is the degree to which these pieces conform to the more accessible, non- virtuosic style seen in Robert Schumann’s Op. 94. While much scholarly research has been directed towards the lives and music of Robert and Clara Schumann, their romances, Op. 94 and Op. 22, respectively, have been largely neglected, and there are almost no detailed analyses and assessments of these works. Scholars generally situate Robert’s Op. 94 either within discussions of Hausmusik or what they call the “Dresden period” or both.1 John Daverio speaks of Schumann’s music from this time period as a dialectic “between esotericism and accessibility.”2 Thus Daverio, drawing from Dahlhaus, relates Schumann’s music to the prevailing Biedermeier sensibility, which prized a bourgeois education, temperament, and “conviviality” that was more conservative, above some of the more progressive and Romantic aesthetics.3 His analyses of the works written around the same time as Robert’s Op. 94 stress the lyrical qualities in balance with irregular phrasings and chromatic harmonies. Martin Geck provides even less actual analyses of the music from this time, but rather contextualizes it within contemporaneous political and aesthetic arguments (both of which concern Wagner).4 Though he neglects Op. 94 completely, through examinations of several of Schumann’s piano pieces, choral pieces, and his opera, Genoveva, from this time, Geck paints a portrait of a composer who is neither necessarily 1 For most scholars, Schumann’s “Dresden period” ends in 1849 and is seen as distinctive from the last period beginning in 1850. 2 John Daverio, Robert Schumann: Herald of a “New Poetic Age” (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997), 394. 3 Ibid., 396. 4 Martin Geck, Robert Schumann: The Life of Work of a Romantic Composer (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013). 2 revolutionary nor reactionary, but rather a “realist” of his time both intellectually and aesthetically.5 One other important source for my study is Laura Tunbridge’s monograph, Schumann’s Late Style.6 Though the dates of Tunbridge’s examination span from 1850 to the end of Schumann’s life, and though she does not discuss Op. 94 (written one month before 1850), the style(s) that she explores, explains, and contextualizes is also the style of Op. 94. She argues that simplicity in music is often more difficult to understand and theorize than complex music, but that through this greater simplicity, Schumann’s participation with amateur musicians, including choral societies and festivals, is far from being mere conservatism, but rather fits into his political and nationalist philosophies.7 In my document, I will apply the conceptualizations of Schumann’s late style found in these sources to my discussion of Op. 94. Assessments of Clara Schumann’s Op. 22 are even more scant. While scholarship by John N. Burk, Joan Chissell, Nancy B. Reich, George Hall, and Monica Steegman has elevated Clara Schumann’s position among the Romantic composers, analyses of her music has tended to focus on her larger works, such as the Piano Trio, Op.