Control of Lagrange Point Orbits Using Solar Sail Propulsion

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Control of Lagrange Point Orbits Using Solar Sail Propulsion CONTROL OF LAGRANGE POINT ORBITS USING SOLAR SAIL PROPULSION John Bookless*, Colin McInnes+ [email protected] *Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland, UK +Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XJ, Scotland, UK Abstract Several missions have utilised halo orbits around the L1 and L2 Lagrange points of the Earth-Sun system. Due to the instability of these orbits, station-keeping techniques are required to prevent escape after orbit insertion. This paper considers using solar sail propulsion to provide station-keeping at quasi-periodic orbits around L1 and L2. Stable manifolds will be identified which provide near-Earth insertion to a quasi- periodic trajectory around the libration point. The possible control techniques investigated include solar sail area variation and solar sail pitch and yaw angle variation. Hill’s equations are used to model the dynamics of the problem and optimal control laws are developed to minimise the control requirements. The constant thrust available using solar sails can be used to generate artificial libration points sunwards of L1 or Earthwards of L2. A possible mission to position a science payload sunward of L1 will be investigated. After insertion to a halo orbit at L1, gradual solar sail deployment can be performed to spiral sunwards along the Sun-Earth axis. Insertion ΔV requirements and area variation control requirements will be examined. This mission could provide advance warning of Earthbound CME (Coronal Mass Ejections) responsible for magnetic storms. Introduction conditions which lead to periodic solutions of the linearised three-body equations. Due to the Solar sailing is an emerging form of propulsion instability of these orbits, station-keeping which utilises solar radiation pressure to provide techniques must be applied to prevent escape a useful thrust. The sail is a thin reflective film after orbit insertion. The solar sail can be made with a thickness of order 2 μm, with a large to track the nominal trajectory by applying trims reflective area in order to intercept a flux of to the sail reflective area or sail pitch angle.11 photons. A key advantage of solar sails over Optimal control laws are applied to minimise the conventional propulsion systems is that missions variation of sail area or pitch angle required to are not constrained by the ΔV available from provide orbit control. stored reaction mass. This enables many new and exciting high-energy mission concepts. The Geostorm mission, developed at JPL, aims 1,2 3 Several authors including Leipold , Macdonald to position a science payload Sunwards of L1. 4 and Hughes have recently investigated the After insertion to a halo orbit around L1, the solar potential of solar sails for planetary missions. sail is slowly deployed resulting in a spiraling motion Sunwards along the Sun-Earth line. This 5-7 8 9 10 McInnes , Farquhar , Forward and Morrow would enable continuous monitoring of the solar have demonstrated that the constant wind to detect CMEs. The increase in charge acceleration from a solar sail can be used to density of the solar wind can result in magnetic generate artificial libration points in the Earth- storms being experienced in the vicinity of the Sun three-body problem. This is achieved by Earth. This space weather phenomenon poses directing the thrust due to solar radiation a considerable risk to geostationary satellites pressure in the anti-Sun direction adding to the which can be bombarded by high energy, 12 centripetal force in the rotating Earth-Sun frame. charged particles. A continuum of libration points can be produced Earthwards of L2 or sunwards of L1. Solar Sails Halo orbits can be generated around these libration points by selecting suitable initial 2 Solar sails consist of large area gossamer pressure = κ xi +κ y j+κ zk . These equations structures with a reflective coating which are non-dimensionalised using 1RE (Earth intercept the solar photon flux. Photons incident Radii) as the characteristic length and on the sail impart momentum and the reflection 3 results in a reaction force, thus providing double characteristic time τ = L μE , where μE is the the force which would be imparted to an Earth gravitational parameter.15 A schematic of absorbing surface. Possible sail substrate the three-body model is provided in Fig 1. candidates include the plastics Mylar, Kapton or CP-1 polyimide film developed at NASA- 13 It is assumed that the Earth is located at the Langley. origin and the separation distance between the The solar sail acceleration is dependent on the Sun and Earth, R, is constant. The sail is areal density, also known as the sail loading. assumed to have negligible mass relative to the The sail acceleration, κ, is defined by larger bodies. βμs 2 2 = η 2 cos α cos φn (1) Rs where η the sail reflectivity, Rs is the distance from the Sun, α is the pitch angle of the sail normal vector n to the Sun-line, φ is the yaw angle of the sail normal vector to the Sun-line and β is the solar sail lightness parameter defined as the ratio of solar radiation pressure to gravitational attraction L β = s (2) 2 cμπ sσ Fig 1: Schematic of Sun-Earth Model with 26 artificial libration point La where solar luminosity Ls = 3.86x10 W, c is the speed of light, μs is the solar gravitational parameter and σ is the ratio of solar sail mass to Jacobi Integral surface area known as the loading parameter. Decreasing sail loading increases the lightness The Jacobi integral can be extracted from Hill’s number thus increasing the characteristic equations with the form 14 acceleration. 2 v2 − − 3Ω x22 Ω+ z 22 − .2 r = C (4) Hill’s Equations r Hill’s approximation of the circular restricted where v = x& 2 + y& 2 + z& 2 is the velocity three-body problem can be adapted to include the dynamical effects of solar radiation pressure magnitude and r = xi + yj+ zk . as x 2 The constant of integration, C, is analogous to x&& − 2Ωy& −= + 3Ω x + κ x (3.1) r3 the total orbit energy E, where C = 2E . The y Jacobi constant can be evaluated for a set of y&& + 2Ωx& −= + κ (3.2) 3 y initial conditions. The obtained value of C can r be used to generate a surface of zero velocity. z 2 This surface of constant energy, also referred to z&& −= Ω− z + κ z (3.3) r3 as Hill’s surface, bounds the orbital motion as it 2 2 2 is forbidden for the trajectory to intersect the where r = x + y + z is the separation surface. between the solar sail and the Earth, Ω is the angular velocity of the Earth orbiting the Sun and the acceleration due to solar radiation Libration Points 3 The L1 and L2 Lagrange points of Hill’s problem Hill’s equations are linearised about the libration are symmetric about the origin on the x-axis. point, new coordinates ξ = x − xo , η = y − yo and The position can be calculated from Eqn (3) by ζ = z − z , where (x , y , z ). The linearised setting the acceleration and velocity components o o o o x& = x&& = y& = y&& = z& = z&& = 0 . Solving Eqn (3.1) for x, equation can be represented by the state equation x& = Ax , where the state vector 2 − 31 Τ gives the Lagrange point location x ±= (3Ω ) . x = [ξ η ς ξ& η& ς&] , The linear coefficient Substituting into Eqn (4), the Jacobi constant matrix is defined as evaluated at the Lagrange points has the form 32 15 C −= ()9Ω for the ballistic case, κ = 0 . ⎡ 0 0 0 1 0 0⎤ ⎢ 0 0 0 0 1 0⎥ An artificial libration point, located at x , can be ⎢ ⎥ o ⎢ 0 0 0 0 0 1⎥ generated using the solar sail acceleration to A = ⎢ ⎥ (6) cancel part of the gravitational forces exerted by ⎢ f xx 0 0 0 2Ω 0⎥ ⎢ ⎥ the Earth and the Sun. The required 0 f yy 0 − 2Ω 0 0 acceleration is given by ⎢ ⎥ ⎣⎢ 0 0 f zz 0 0 0⎦⎥ x κ = o − 3Ω2 x (5) o 3 o r nd o where fxx, fyy and fzz are the 2 order derivatives where =κ κoi in the case of a Sun-pointing sail. of the pseudo-potential Table 1 provides the values of Jacobi Constant 1 Ω2 zyxf ),,( = + 3( x2 − z 2 ) +κx (7) for the contours shown in Fig 2. These contours r 2 represent constant energy surfaces of zero- velocity. The values of C, evaluated at the The partial derivatives are evaluated at the libration points represent a critical value for a libration point. closed surface. As orbit energy is increased, a gap opens in the surface around the libration In the x-y plane the linear solution produces two point. real eigenvalues and two imaginary eigenvalues. Using the method outlined by Szebehely16, the No. xo Jacobi Constant Acceleration terms containing real eigenvalues are RE C κ suppressed which obtains the oscillatory 1 234.46 -0.012795 0 solution -6 2 210 -0.015626 6.383x10 3 190 -0.0182518 1.296 x10-5 ξ = yvA sin(λxyτ ) (8.1) 4 170 -0.021287 2.141 x10-5 -5 A 5 150 -0.024921 3.281 x10 η = y cos(λxyτ ) (8.2) Table 1: Jacobi Constant for libration points ς = Ay cos(λzyτ ) (8.3) where Ay is the y-axis orbit amplitude. The in-plane eigenvalue λxy is defined as ⎛ ⎞ 1 ⎜ 2 2 2 ⎟ λxy = ()4Ω− + fxx + f yy − ()4Ω − fxx − f yy − 4()xx ff yy 2 ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ (9) and the out of plane eigenvalue λz = f zz .
Recommended publications
  • Low Thrust Manoeuvres to Perform Large Changes of RAAN Or Inclination in LEO
    Facoltà di Ingegneria Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Ingegneria Aerospaziale Master Thesis Low Thrust Manoeuvres To Perform Large Changes of RAAN or Inclination in LEO Academic Tutor: Prof. Lorenzo CASALINO Candidate: Filippo GRISOT July 2018 “It is possible for ordinary people to choose to be extraordinary” E. Musk ii Filippo Grisot – Master Thesis iii Filippo Grisot – Master Thesis Acknowledgments I would like to address my sincere acknowledgments to my professor Lorenzo Casalino, for your huge help in these moths, for your willingness, for your professionalism and for your kindness. It was very stimulating, as well as fun, working with you. I would like to thank all my course-mates, for the time spent together inside and outside the “Poli”, for the help in passing the exams, for the fun and the desperation we shared throughout these years. I would like to especially express my gratitude to Emanuele, Gianluca, Giulia, Lorenzo and Fabio who, more than everyone, had to bear with me. I would like to also thank all my extra-Poli friends, especially Alberto, for your support and the long talks throughout these years, Zach, for being so close although the great distance between us, Bea’s family, for all the Sundays and summers spent together, and my soccer team Belfiga FC, for being the crazy lovable people you are. A huge acknowledgment needs to be address to my family: to my grandfather Luciano, for being a great friend; to my grandmother Bianca, for teaching me what “fighting” means; to my grandparents Beppe and Etta, for protecting me
    [Show full text]
  • Observing from Space Orbits, Constraints, Planning, Coordination
    Observing from Space Orbits, constraints, planning, coordination Integral XMM-Newton Jan-Uwe Ness European Space Astronomy Centre (ESAC) Villafranca del Castillo, Spain On behalf of the Integral and XMM-Newton Science Operations Centres Slide 1 Observing from Space - Orbits http://sci.esa.int/integral/59688-integral-fifteen-years-in-orbit/ Slide 2 Observing from Space - Orbits Highly elliptical Earth orbit: XMM-Newton, Integral, Chandra Slide 3 Observing from Space - Orbits Low-Earth orbit: ~1.5 hour, examples: Hubble Space Telescope Swift NuSTAR Fermi Earth blocking, especially low declination objects Only short snapshots of a few 100s possible No long uninterrupted observations Only partial overlap with Integral/XMM possible Slide 4 Observing from Space - Orbits Orbit around Lagrange point L2 past: future: Herschel James Webb Planck Athena present: Gaia Slide 5 Observing from Space – Constraints Motivations for constraints: • Safety of space-craft and instruments • Contamination by bright optical/X-ray sources or straylight from them • Functionality of star Tracker • Power supply (solar panels) • Thermal stability (avoid heat from the sun) • Ground contact for remote commanding and downlink of data Space-specific constraints in bold orange Slide 6 Observing from Space – Constraints Examples for constraints: • No observations while passing through radiation belts • Orientation of space craft to sun • Large avoidance angles around Sun and anti-Sun, Moon, Earth, Bright planets • No slewing over Moon and Earth (planets ok) • Availability
    [Show full text]
  • Astrodynamics
    Politecnico di Torino SEEDS SpacE Exploration and Development Systems Astrodynamics II Edition 2006 - 07 - Ver. 2.0.1 Author: Guido Colasurdo Dipartimento di Energetica Teacher: Giulio Avanzini Dipartimento di Ingegneria Aeronautica e Spaziale e-mail: [email protected] Contents 1 Two–Body Orbital Mechanics 1 1.1 BirthofAstrodynamics: Kepler’sLaws. ......... 1 1.2 Newton’sLawsofMotion ............................ ... 2 1.3 Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitation . ......... 3 1.4 The n–BodyProblem ................................. 4 1.5 Equation of Motion in the Two-Body Problem . ....... 5 1.6 PotentialEnergy ................................. ... 6 1.7 ConstantsoftheMotion . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... 7 1.8 TrajectoryEquation .............................. .... 8 1.9 ConicSections ................................... 8 1.10 Relating Energy and Semi-major Axis . ........ 9 2 Two-Dimensional Analysis of Motion 11 2.1 ReferenceFrames................................. 11 2.2 Velocity and acceleration components . ......... 12 2.3 First-Order Scalar Equations of Motion . ......... 12 2.4 PerifocalReferenceFrame . ...... 13 2.5 FlightPathAngle ................................. 14 2.6 EllipticalOrbits................................ ..... 15 2.6.1 Geometry of an Elliptical Orbit . ..... 15 2.6.2 Period of an Elliptical Orbit . ..... 16 2.7 Time–of–Flight on the Elliptical Orbit . .......... 16 2.8 Extensiontohyperbolaandparabola. ........ 18 2.9 Circular and Escape Velocity, Hyperbolic Excess Speed . .............. 18 2.10 CosmicVelocities
    [Show full text]
  • AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference
    DRAFT version: 7/15/2011 11:04 AM http://www.alyeskaresort.com AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference July 31 ‐ August 4, 2011 Girdwood, Alaska AAS General Chair AIAA General Chair Ryan P. Russell William Todd Cerven Georgia Institute of Technology The Aerospace Corporation AAS Technical Chair AIAA Technical Chair Hanspeter Schaub Brian C. Gunter University of Colorado Delft University of Technology DRAFT version: 7/15/2011 11:04 AM http://www.alyeskaresort.com Cover images: Top right: Conference Location: Aleyska Resort in Girdwood Alaska. Middle left: Cassini looking back at an eclipsed Saturn, Astronomy picture of the day 2006 Oct 16, credit CICLOPS, JPL, ESA, NASA; Middle right: Shuttle shadow in the sunset (in honor of the end of the Shuttle Era), Astronomy picture of the day 2010 February 16, credit: Expedition 22 Crew, NASA. Bottom right: Comet Hartley 2 Flyby, Astronomy picture of the day 2010 Nov 5, Credit: NASA, JPL-Caltech, UMD, EPOXI Mission DRAFT version: 7/15/2011 11:04 AM http://www.alyeskaresort.com Table of Contents Registration ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Schedule of Events ................................................................................................................................... 6 Conference Center Layout ........................................................................................................................ 7 Conference Location: The Hotel Alyeska ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • AFSPC-CO TERMINOLOGY Revised: 12 Jan 2019
    AFSPC-CO TERMINOLOGY Revised: 12 Jan 2019 Term Description AEHF Advanced Extremely High Frequency AFB / AFS Air Force Base / Air Force Station AOC Air Operations Center AOI Area of Interest The point in the orbit of a heavenly body, specifically the moon, or of a man-made satellite Apogee at which it is farthest from the earth. Even CAP rockets experience apogee. Either of two points in an eccentric orbit, one (higher apsis) farthest from the center of Apsis attraction, the other (lower apsis) nearest to the center of attraction Argument of Perigee the angle in a satellites' orbit plane that is measured from the Ascending Node to the (ω) perigee along the satellite direction of travel CGO Company Grade Officer CLV Calculated Load Value, Crew Launch Vehicle COP Common Operating Picture DCO Defensive Cyber Operations DHS Department of Homeland Security DoD Department of Defense DOP Dilution of Precision Defense Satellite Communications Systems - wideband communications spacecraft for DSCS the USAF DSP Defense Satellite Program or Defense Support Program - "Eyes in the Sky" EHF Extremely High Frequency (30-300 GHz; 1mm-1cm) ELF Extremely Low Frequency (3-30 Hz; 100,000km-10,000km) EMS Electromagnetic Spectrum Equitorial Plane the plane passing through the equator EWR Early Warning Radar and Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity GBR Ground-Based Radar and Global Broadband Roaming GBS Global Broadcast Service GEO Geosynchronous Earth Orbit or Geostationary Orbit ( ~22,300 miles above Earth) GEODSS Ground-Based Electro-Optical Deep Space Surveillance
    [Show full text]
  • Asteroid Retrieval Mission
    Where you can put your asteroid Nathan Strange, Damon Landau, and ARRM team NASA/JPL-CalTech © 2014 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Distant Retrograde Orbits Works for Earth, Moon, Mars, Phobos, Deimos etc… very stable orbits Other Lunar Storage Orbit Options • Lagrange Points – Earth-Moon L1/L2 • Unstable; this instability enables many interesting low-energy transfers but vehicles require active station keeping to stay in vicinity of L1/L2 – Earth-Moon L4/L5 • Some orbits in this region is may be stable, but are difficult for MPCV to reach • Lunar Weakly Captured Orbits – These are the transition from high lunar orbits to Lagrange point orbits – They are a new and less well understood class of orbits that could be long term stable and could be easier for the MPCV to reach than DROs – More study is needed to determine if these are good options • Intermittent Capture – Weakly captured Earth orbit, escapes and is then recaptured a year later • Earth Orbit with Lunar Gravity Assists – Many options with Earth-Moon gravity assist tours Backflip Orbits • A backflip orbit is two flybys half a rev apart • Could be done with the Moon, Earth or Mars. Backflip orbit • Lunar backflips are nice plane because they could be used to “catch and release” asteroids • Earth backflips are nice orbits in which to construct things out of asteroids before sending them on to places like Earth- Earth or Moon orbit plane Mars cyclers 4 Example Mars Cyclers Two-Synodic-Period Cycler Three-Synodic-Period Cycler Possibly Ballistic Chen, et al., “Powered Earth-Mars Cycler with Three Synodic-Period Repeat Time,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Sept.-Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Aas 11-509 Artemis Lunar Orbit Insertion and Science Orbit Design Through 2013
    AAS 11-509 ARTEMIS LUNAR ORBIT INSERTION AND SCIENCE ORBIT DESIGN THROUGH 2013 Stephen B. Broschart,∗ Theodore H. Sweetser,y Vassilis Angelopoulos,z David C. Folta,x and Mark A. Woodard{ As of late-July 2011, the ARTEMIS mission is transferring two spacecraft from Lissajous orbits around Earth-Moon Lagrange Point #1 into highly-eccentric lunar science orbits. This paper presents the trajectory design for the transfer from Lissajous orbit to lunar orbit in- sertion, the period reduction maneuvers, and the science orbits through 2013. The design accommodates large perturbations from Earth’s gravity and restrictive spacecraft capabili- ties to enable opportunities for a range of heliophysics and planetary science measurements. The process used to design the highly-eccentric ARTEMIS science orbits is outlined. The approach may inform the design of future eccentric orbiter missions at planetary moons. INTRODUCTION The Acceleration, Reconnection, Turbulence and Electrodynamics of the Moons Interaction with the Sun (ARTEMIS) mission is currently operating two spacecraft in lunar orbit under funding from the Heliophysics and Planetary Science Divisions with NASA’s Science Missions Directorate. ARTEMIS is an extension to the successful Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms (THEMIS) mission [1] that has relocated two of the THEMIS spacecraft from Earth orbit to the Moon [2, 3, 4]. ARTEMIS plans to conduct a variety of scientific studies at the Moon using the on-board particle and fields instrument package [5, 6]. The final portion of the ARTEMIS transfers involves moving the two ARTEMIS spacecraft, known as P1 and P2, from Lissajous orbits around the Earth-Moon Lagrange Point #1 (EML1) to long-lived, eccentric lunar science orbits with periods of roughly 28 hr.
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of the Mass Limit for Stability at the Triangular Lagrange
    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Master's Theses Master's Theses and Graduate Research Spring 2015 An Examination of the Mass Limit for Stability at the Triangular Lagrange Points for a Three-Body System and a Special Case of the Four-Body Problem Sean Kemp San Jose State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses Recommended Citation Kemp, Sean, "An Examination of the Mass Limit for Stability at the Triangular Lagrange Points for a Three-Body System and a Special Case of the Four-Body Problem" (2015). Master's Theses. 4546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31979/etd.4tf8-hnqx https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses/4546 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Master's Theses and Graduate Research at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AN EXAMINATION OF THE MASS LIMIT FOR STABILITY AT THE TRIANGULAR LAGRANGE POINTS FOR A THREE-BODY SYSTEM AND A SPECIAL CASE OF THE FOUR-BODY PROBLEM A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Physics and Astronomy San José State University In Partial Fulllment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science by Sean P. Kemp May 2015 c 2015 Sean P. Kemp ALL RIGHTS RESERVED The Designated Thesis Committee Approves the Thesis Titled AN EXAMINATION OF THE MASS LIMIT FOR STABILITY AT THE TRIANGULAR LAGRANGE POINTS FOR A THREE-BODY SYSTEM AND A SPECIAL CASE OF THE FOUR-BODY PROBLEM by Sean P.
    [Show full text]
  • Design of Small Circular Halo Orbit Around L2
    Design of Small Circular Halo Orbit around L2 Kohta Tarao* and Jun’ichiro Kawaguchi** *Graduate Student, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo ** The Institute of Space and Astronautics Science / Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (ISAS/JAXA) 3-1-1 Yoshinodai, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229-8510, JAPAN. Abstract A Lagrange point of Sun-Earth system, L1 or L2 is conceived one of the best point for astronomy and connection ports for outer planets. This paper describes a new useful control method for realizing and keeping small circular Halo orbits around the L2 point. First, a control law is mathematically derived from the restricted three body problem formulation and the associated properties are discussed. And next, some useful cases for the space mission are verified numerically using real ephemeris. The resulted Halo orbit is compact and circular realized with satisfactorily small thrust. The paper concludes the strategy is applied to many kinds of missions. L2 点周りの小円ハロー軌道設計 多羅尾康太(東大・工・院)、川口淳一郎(ISAS/JAXA) 摘要 太陽―月・地球系におけるラグランジュ点の中で、L2 点は太陽と地球との距離がほぼ一定で、太 陽、地球との幾何学的関係が保たれ、またダウンリンク通信が太陽の影響を受けない点で L1 点よ りも有利である。そのため L2 点周辺の軌道は、赤外線天文衛星や外惑星探査のための起・終点と しての宇宙港の軌道として利用が考えられている。本論文では、新しい制御法により L2 点回りに 小さな円形の Halo 軌道が作れることを示す。まず初めに、円制限三体問題における線形化された 方程式から理論的に制御則を導く。その後、実軌道要素を用いて軌道制御方法を検証する。軌道制 御に必要な推力は十分小さく大変実用的な制御方法である。 INTRODUCTION million kilometers and also due to its highly alternating geometry. A Lissajous orbit also exists A Lagrange point is the point where the gravity of around the L2 point naturally, however, the orbital two planets such as Sun and Earth is equal to plane rotates and the solar power availability is centrifugal force by their circular motions. L1 and often restricted due to the shadow by the Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Applications of Multi-Body Dynamical Environments: the ARTEMIS Transfer Trajectory Design
    Paper ID: 7461 61st International Astronautical Congress 2010 Applications of Multi-Body Dynamical Environments: The ARTEMIS Transfer Trajectory Design ASTRODYNAMICS SYMPOSIUM (CI) Mission Design, Operations and Optimization (2) (9) Mr. David C. Folta and Mr. Mark Woodard National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, United States, david.c.folta<@nasa.gov Prof. Kathleen Howell, Chris Patterson, Wayne Schlei Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States, [email protected] Abstract The application of forces in multi-body dynamical environments to pennit the transfer of spacecraft from Earth orbit to Sun-Earth weak stability regions and then return to the Earth-Moon libration (L1 and L2) orbits has been successfully accomplished for the first time. This demonstrated transfer is a positive step in the realization of a design process that can be used to transfer spacecraft with minimal Delta-V expenditures. Initialized using gravity assists to overcome fuel constraints; the ARTEMIS trajectory design has successfully placed two spacecraft into Earth­ Moon libration orbits by means of these applications. INTRODUCTION The exploitation of multi-body dynamical environments to pennit the transfer of spacecraft from Earth to Sun-Earth weak stability regions and then return to the Earth-Moon libration (L 1 and L2) orbits has been successfully accomplished. This demonstrated transfer is a positive step in the realization of a design process that can be used to transfer spacecraft with minimal Delta-Velocity (L.\V) expenditure. Initialized using gravity assists to overcome fuel constraints, the Acceleration Reconnection and Turbulence and Electrodynamics of the Moon's Interaction with the Sun (ARTEMIS) mission design has successfully placed two spacecraft into Earth-Moon libration orbits by means of this application of forces from multiple gravity fields.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Process for Limiting Orbital Debris
    NASA-HANDBOOK NASA HANDBOOK 8719.14 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Approved: 2008-07-30 Washington, DC 20546 Expiration Date: 2013-07-30 HANDBOOK FOR LIMITING ORBITAL DEBRIS Measurement System Identification: Metric APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE – DISTRIBUTION IS UNLIMITED NASA-Handbook 8719.14 This page intentionally left blank. Page 2 of 174 NASA-Handbook 8719.14 DOCUMENT HISTORY LOG Status Document Approval Date Description Revision Baseline 2008-07-30 Initial Release Page 3 of 174 NASA-Handbook 8719.14 This page intentionally left blank. Page 4 of 174 NASA-Handbook 8719.14 This page intentionally left blank. Page 6 of 174 NASA-Handbook 8719.14 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 SCOPE...........................................................................................................................13 1.1 Purpose................................................................................................................................ 13 1.2 Applicability ....................................................................................................................... 13 2 APPLICABLE AND REFERENCE DOCUMENTS................................................14 3 ACRONYMS AND DEFINITIONS ...........................................................................15 3.1 Acronyms............................................................................................................................ 15 3.2 Definitions .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Libration Orbit Mission Design: Applications of Numerical and Dynamical Methods
    Libration Orbit Mission Design: Applications Of Numerical And Dynamical Methods David Folta and Mark Beckman NASA - Goddard Space Flight Center Libration Point Orbits and Applications June 10-14, 2002, Girona, Spain Agenda • NASA Enterprises • Challenges • Historical and future missions • Libration mission design via numerical and dynamical methods • Applications ¾Direct transfer ¾Low thrust ¾Servicing ¾Formations: Constellation-X and Stellar Imager ¾Conceptual studies • Improved tools • Conclusions NASA Themes and Libration Orbits NASA Enterprises of Space Sciences (SSE) and Earth Sciences (ESE) are a combination of several programs and themes SSE ESE SEU SEC Origins • Recent SEC missions include ACE, SOHO, and the L1/L2 WIND mission. The Living With a Star (LWS) portion of SEC may require libration orbits at the L1 and L3 Sun-Earth libration points. • Structure and Evolution of the Universe (SEU) currently has MAP and the future Micro Arc-second X-ray Imaging Mission (MAXIM) and Constellation-X missions. •Space Sciences’ Origins libration missions are the Next Generation Space Telescope (NGST) and The Terrestrial Planet Finder (TPF). • The Triana mission is the lone ESE mission not orbiting the Earth. • A major challenge is formation flying components of Constellation-X, MAXIM, TPF, and Stellar Imager. Future Libration Mission SSE and ESE Challenges ¾ Orbit ¾Biased orbits when using large sun shades ¾Shadow restrictions ¾Very small amplitudes ¾Reorientation to different planes and Lissajous classes ¾Rendezvous and formation flying ¾Low
    [Show full text]