DOCSLIB.ORG

AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference DRAFT version: 7/15/2011 11:04 AM http://www.alyeskaresort.com AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference July 31 ‐ August 4, 2011 Girdwood, Alaska AAS General Chair AIAA General Chair Ryan P. Russell William Todd Cerven Georgia Institute of Technology The Aerospace Corporation AAS Technical Chair AIAA Technical Chair Hanspeter Schaub Brian C. Gunter University of Colorado Delft University of Technology DRAFT version: 7/15/2011 11:04 AM http://www.alyeskaresort.com Cover images: Top right: Conference Location: Aleyska Resort in Girdwood Alaska. Middle left: Cassini looking back at an eclipsed Saturn, Astronomy picture of the day 2006 Oct 16, credit CICLOPS, JPL, ESA, NASA; Middle right: Shuttle shadow in the sunset (in honor of the end of the Shuttle Era), Astronomy picture of the day 2010 February 16, credit: Expedition 22 Crew, NASA. Bottom right: Comet Hartley 2 Flyby, Astronomy picture of the day 2010 Nov 5, Credit: NASA, JPL-Caltech, UMD, EPOXI Mission DRAFT version: 7/15/2011 11:04 AM http://www.alyeskaresort.com Table of Contents Registration ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Schedule of Events ................................................................................................................................... 6 Conference Center Layout ........................................................................................................................ 7 Conference Location: The Hotel Alyeska ................................................................................................ 8 Transportation Info ............................................................................................................................... 9 Activities Near the Hotel ...................................................................................................................... 9 BE PREPARED! What to Pack ......................................................................................................... 10 Photos Of Area And Activities ........................................................................................................... 11 Hotel Alyeska Map ............................................................................................................................. 12 Girdwood Map .................................................................................................................................... 13 Anchorage Area Map .......................................................................................................................... 14 Special Events ......................................................................................................................................... 15 Early Bird Reception .......................................................................................................................... 15 Tram Ride/Dinner at Glacier Express Restaurant * ........................................................................... 15 Award Ceremony/Keynote Address Banquet* ................................................................................... 15 Additional Information ........................................................................................................................... 16 Speaker Orientation ............................................................................................................................ 16 Volunteers ........................................................................................................................................... 16 Presentations ....................................................................................................................................... 16 Preprinted Manuscripts ....................................................................................................................... 16 Conference Proceedings ..................................................................................................................... 16 Satisfaction Survey ............................................................................................................................. 17 Committee and Subcommittee Meetings ............................................................................................ 17 Session 1: Asteroid & NEO I ............................................................................................................ 18 Session 2: Orbital Debris I ............................................................................................................... 20 Session 3: Dynamical Systems Theory ......................................................................................... 22 Session 4: Special Topic: Autonomous Aerobraking ................................................................... 24 Session 5: Asteroid & NEO II ........................................................................................................... 26 Session 6: Trajectory Optimization I ............................................................................................... 28 Session 7: Formation Flying I .......................................................................................................... 30 Session 8: Special Topic: Conjunction Assessment .................................................................... 32 Session 9: Non-Earth Orbiting Missions ........................................................................................ 34 Session 10: Formation Flying II ....................................................................................................... 36 DRAFT version: 7/15/2011 11:04 AM http://www.alyeskaresort.com Session 11: Orbit Estimation I ......................................................................................................... 38 Session 12: Special Topic: ARTEMIS Mission ............................................................................. 40 Session 13: Planetary Mission Studies .......................................................................................... 42 Session 14: Spacecraft GN&C ........................................................................................................ 44 Session 15: Satellite Constellations ............................................................................................... 46 Session 16: Special Topic: MESSENGER at Mercury ................................................................ 48 Session 17: Trajectory Optimization II ........................................................................................... 50 Session 18: Attitude D&C I............................................................................................................... 52 Session 19: Orbit Estimation II ........................................................................................................ 54 Session 20: Spacecraft Autonomy .................................................................................................. 56 Session 21: Orbital Debris II ............................................................................................................ 59 Session 22: Attitude D&C II ............................................................................................................. 60 Session 23: Orbit Estimation III ....................................................................................................... 61 Session 24: Space Environment ..................................................................................................... 62 Session 25: Trajectory Optimization III .......................................................................................... 63 Session 26: Large Space Structures and Tethers ....................................................................... 65 Session 27: Optimal Control ............................................................................................................ 67 Session 28: Rendezvous .................................................................................................................. 69 Author Index ........................................................................................................................................... 71 Conference Planner ................................................................................................................................. 75 Record of Meeting Expenses .................................................................................................................. 76 Conference Satisfaction Survey .............................................................................................................. 78 Page 4 2011 AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Girdwood, Alaska DRAFT version: 7/15/2011 11:04 AM http://www.alyeskaresort.com AAS/AIAA ASTRODYNAMICS SPECIALIST CONFERENCE INFORMATION REGISTRATION Registration Site (https://aas.pxi.com/registration/reg/ ) In order to encourage early registration, we have implemented the following conference registration rate structure: Register before July 1, 2011 and save $50! Category Early Registration Standard (before July1, 2011) Registration Full - AAS or AIAA Member $505 $555 Full - Non-member $605 $655 Retired* $150 $200 Student* $150 $200 Tues night Tram Ride/Dinner Ticket $50 $50 Tues night Tram Ride/Dinner Ticket: Child age 5-12 (4 $25 $25 years and under is free) Wed night Awards/Keynote Speaker Banquet Ticket
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Low-Energy Lunar Trajectory Design
    LOW-ENERGY LUNAR TRAJECTORY DESIGN Jeffrey S. Parker and Rodney L. Anderson Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, California July 2013 ii DEEP SPACE COMMUNICATIONS AND NAVIGATION SERIES Issued by the Deep Space Communications and Navigation Systems Center of Excellence Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Joseph H. Yuen, Editor-in-Chief Published Titles in this Series Radiometric Tracking Techniques for Deep-Space Navigation Catherine L. Thornton and James S. Border Formulation for Observed and Computed Values of Deep Space Network Data Types for Navigation Theodore D. Moyer Bandwidth-Efficient Digital Modulation with Application to Deep-Space Communication Marvin K. Simon Large Antennas of the Deep Space Network William A. Imbriale Antenna Arraying Techniques in the Deep Space Network David H. Rogstad, Alexander Mileant, and Timothy T. Pham Radio Occultations Using Earth Satellites: A Wave Theory Treatment William G. Melbourne Deep Space Optical Communications Hamid Hemmati, Editor Spaceborne Antennas for Planetary Exploration William A. Imbriale, Editor Autonomous Software-Defined Radio Receivers for Deep Space Applications Jon Hamkins and Marvin K. Simon, Editors Low-Noise Systems in the Deep Space Network Macgregor S. Reid, Editor Coupled-Oscillator Based Active-Array Antennas Ronald J. Pogorzelski and Apostolos Georgiadis Low-Energy Lunar Trajectory Design Jeffrey S. Parker and Rodney L. Anderson LOW-ENERGY LUNAR TRAJECTORY DESIGN Jeffrey S. Parker and Rodney L. Anderson Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, California July 2013 iv Low-Energy Lunar Trajectory Design July 2013 Jeffrey Parker: I dedicate the majority of this book to my wife Jen, my best friend and greatest support throughout the development of this book and always.
    [Show full text]
  • Astrodynamics
    Politecnico di Torino SEEDS SpacE Exploration and Development Systems Astrodynamics II Edition 2006 - 07 - Ver. 2.0.1 Author: Guido Colasurdo Dipartimento di Energetica Teacher: Giulio Avanzini Dipartimento di Ingegneria Aeronautica e Spaziale e-mail: [email protected] Contents 1 Two–Body Orbital Mechanics 1 1.1 BirthofAstrodynamics: Kepler’sLaws. ......... 1 1.2 Newton’sLawsofMotion ............................ ... 2 1.3 Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitation . ......... 3 1.4 The n–BodyProblem ................................. 4 1.5 Equation of Motion in the Two-Body Problem . ....... 5 1.6 PotentialEnergy ................................. ... 6 1.7 ConstantsoftheMotion . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... 7 1.8 TrajectoryEquation .............................. .... 8 1.9 ConicSections ................................... 8 1.10 Relating Energy and Semi-major Axis . ........ 9 2 Two-Dimensional Analysis of Motion 11 2.1 ReferenceFrames................................. 11 2.2 Velocity and acceleration components . ......... 12 2.3 First-Order Scalar Equations of Motion . ......... 12 2.4 PerifocalReferenceFrame . ...... 13 2.5 FlightPathAngle ................................. 14 2.6 EllipticalOrbits................................ ..... 15 2.6.1 Geometry of an Elliptical Orbit . ..... 15 2.6.2 Period of an Elliptical Orbit . ..... 16 2.7 Time–of–Flight on the Elliptical Orbit . .......... 16 2.8 Extensiontohyperbolaandparabola. ........ 18 2.9 Circular and Escape Velocity, Hyperbolic Excess Speed . .............. 18 2.10 CosmicVelocities
    [Show full text]
  • Aas 11-509 Artemis Lunar Orbit Insertion and Science Orbit Design Through 2013
    AAS 11-509 ARTEMIS LUNAR ORBIT INSERTION AND SCIENCE ORBIT DESIGN THROUGH 2013 Stephen B. Broschart,∗ Theodore H. Sweetser,y Vassilis Angelopoulos,z David C. Folta,x and Mark A. Woodard{ As of late-July 2011, the ARTEMIS mission is transferring two spacecraft from Lissajous orbits around Earth-Moon Lagrange Point #1 into highly-eccentric lunar science orbits. This paper presents the trajectory design for the transfer from Lissajous orbit to lunar orbit in- sertion, the period reduction maneuvers, and the science orbits through 2013. The design accommodates large perturbations from Earth’s gravity and restrictive spacecraft capabili- ties to enable opportunities for a range of heliophysics and planetary science measurements. The process used to design the highly-eccentric ARTEMIS science orbits is outlined. The approach may inform the design of future eccentric orbiter missions at planetary moons. INTRODUCTION The Acceleration, Reconnection, Turbulence and Electrodynamics of the Moons Interaction with the Sun (ARTEMIS) mission is currently operating two spacecraft in lunar orbit under funding from the Heliophysics and Planetary Science Divisions with NASA’s Science Missions Directorate. ARTEMIS is an extension to the successful Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms (THEMIS) mission [1] that has relocated two of the THEMIS spacecraft from Earth orbit to the Moon [2, 3, 4]. ARTEMIS plans to conduct a variety of scientific studies at the Moon using the on-board particle and fields instrument package [5, 6]. The final portion of the ARTEMIS transfers involves moving the two ARTEMIS spacecraft, known as P1 and P2, from Lissajous orbits around the Earth-Moon Lagrange Point #1 (EML1) to long-lived, eccentric lunar science orbits with periods of roughly 28 hr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Minor Planet Bulletin
    THE MINOR PLANET BULLETIN OF THE MINOR PLANETS SECTION OF THE BULLETIN ASSOCIATION OF LUNAR AND PLANETARY OBSERVERS VOLUME 36, NUMBER 3, A.D. 2009 JULY-SEPTEMBER 77. PHOTOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS OF 343 OSTARA Our data can be obtained from http://www.uwec.edu/physics/ AND OTHER ASTEROIDS AT HOBBS OBSERVATORY asteroid/. Lyle Ford, George Stecher, Kayla Lorenzen, and Cole Cook Acknowledgements Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire We thank the Theodore Dunham Fund for Astrophysics, the Eau Claire, WI 54702-4004 National Science Foundation (award number 0519006), the [email protected] University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Office of Research and Sponsored Programs, and the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire (Received: 2009 Feb 11) Blugold Fellow and McNair programs for financial support. References We observed 343 Ostara on 2008 October 4 and obtained R and V standard magnitudes. The period was Binzel, R.P. (1987). “A Photoelectric Survey of 130 Asteroids”, found to be significantly greater than the previously Icarus 72, 135-208. reported value of 6.42 hours. Measurements of 2660 Wasserman and (17010) 1999 CQ72 made on 2008 Stecher, G.J., Ford, L.A., and Elbert, J.D. (1999). “Equipping a March 25 are also reported. 0.6 Meter Alt-Azimuth Telescope for Photometry”, IAPPP Comm, 76, 68-74. We made R band and V band photometric measurements of 343 Warner, B.D. (2006). A Practical Guide to Lightcurve Photometry Ostara on 2008 October 4 using the 0.6 m “Air Force” Telescope and Analysis. Springer, New York, NY. located at Hobbs Observatory (MPC code 750) near Fall Creek, Wisconsin.
    [Show full text]
  • Applications of Multi-Body Dynamical Environments: the ARTEMIS Transfer Trajectory Design
    Paper ID: 7461 61st International Astronautical Congress 2010 Applications of Multi-Body Dynamical Environments: The ARTEMIS Transfer Trajectory Design ASTRODYNAMICS SYMPOSIUM (CI) Mission Design, Operations and Optimization (2) (9) Mr. David C. Folta and Mr. Mark Woodard National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, United States, david.c.folta<@nasa.gov Prof. Kathleen Howell, Chris Patterson, Wayne Schlei Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States, [email protected] Abstract The application of forces in multi-body dynamical environments to pennit the transfer of spacecraft from Earth orbit to Sun-Earth weak stability regions and then return to the Earth-Moon libration (L1 and L2) orbits has been successfully accomplished for the first time. This demonstrated transfer is a positive step in the realization of a design process that can be used to transfer spacecraft with minimal Delta-V expenditures. Initialized using gravity assists to overcome fuel constraints; the ARTEMIS trajectory design has successfully placed two spacecraft into Earth­ Moon libration orbits by means of these applications. INTRODUCTION The exploitation of multi-body dynamical environments to pennit the transfer of spacecraft from Earth to Sun-Earth weak stability regions and then return to the Earth-Moon libration (L 1 and L2) orbits has been successfully accomplished. This demonstrated transfer is a positive step in the realization of a design process that can be used to transfer spacecraft with minimal Delta-Velocity (L.\V) expenditure. Initialized using gravity assists to overcome fuel constraints, the Acceleration Reconnection and Turbulence and Electrodynamics of the Moon's Interaction with the Sun (ARTEMIS) mission design has successfully placed two spacecraft into Earth-Moon libration orbits by means of this application of forces from multiple gravity fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Professor Jun'ichiro Kawaguchi: Particles Brought Back From
    Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency January 2011 No. 03 Special Features Professor Jun’ichiro Kawaguchi: Refl ecting on the Hayabusa mission and the future of space exploration Particles brought back from Asteroid Itokawa: What methods did researchers use to discover particles inside Hayabusa’s sample-return capsule? Contents No. 03 Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency 1−7 Interview with Professor Jun’ichiro Welcome to JAXA TODAY Kawaguchi The Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) works to realize its Midori Nishiura, advisor to JAXA vision of contributing to a safe and prosperous society through the on public affairs, interviewed pursuit of research and development in the aerospace fi eld to deepen Professor Jun’ichiro Kawaguchi humankind’s understanding of the universe. JAXA’s activities cover a on such topics as the development broad spectrum of the space and aeronautical fi elds, including satellite of Japan’s space probes and the development and operation, astronomical observation, planetary future of space exploration. exploration, participation in the International Space Station (ISS) project, and the development of new rockets and next-generation aeronautical technology. 8-11 With the aim of disseminating information about JAXA’s activities How many particles from Itokawa and recent news relating to Japan’s space development programs to was Hayabusa able to capture? as wide an audience as possible, we launched JAXA TODAY in January 2010. Marking the fi rst anniversary of the launch of JAXA TODAY, in What methods did research- this, the third issue, we feature an interview with Professor Jun’ichiro ers use to discover the particles Kawaguchi, who led the Hayabusa project, and also provide a close-up brought back from Asteroid look at how the particles brought back from Asteroid Itokawa were dis- Itokawa inside Hayabusa’s covered inside Hayabusa’s sample-return capsule.
    [Show full text]
  • 17 Minor Planet Bulletin 45 (2018) LIGHTCURVE and ROTATION
    17 LIGHTCURVE AND ROTATION PERIOD DETERMINATION FOR 5813 EIZABURO AND (11745) 1999 NH3 Fabio Salvaggio Wild Boar Remote Observatory (K49) 21047 – Saronno (VA), ITALY [email protected] Massimo Banfi Wild Boar Remote Observatory (K49) Nova Milanese (MI), ITALY Alessandro Marchini Astronomical Observatory, DSFTA - University of Siena (K54) via Roma, 56, 53100 – Siena, ITALY Riccardo Papini Wild Boar Remote Observatory (K49) San Casciano in Val di Pesa (FI), ITALY (Received: 2017 Sep 20) Photometric observations of the main-belt asteroids 5813 Eizaburo and (11745) 1999 NH3 performed made in 2017 August revealed a bimodal lightcurve phased to 2.876 ± 0.002 h for 5813 Eizaburo and 3.280 ± 0.001 h for (11745) 1999 NH3 as the most likely synodic rotational periods for these asteroids. Lightcurve analysis for main-belt asteroids 5813 Eizaburo and (11745) 1999 NH3 was done using images obtained in 2017 August at the Astronomical Observatory of the University of (11745) 1999 NH3 is a main-belt asteroid discovered on 1999 July Siena (Italy) and at the Wild Boar Remote Observatory (K49). 13 by LINEAR at Socorro. The orbit has a semi-major axis of about 2.70 AU, eccentricity 0.179, and orbital period of about 4.56 At the Astronomical Observatory of the University of Siena, data years. We observed this asteroid from 2017 August 14-18. The were obtained with 0.30-m f/5.6 Maksutov-Cassegrain telescope, collaborative observations resulted in five sessions with a total of SBIG STL-6303E NABG CCD camera, and clear filter; the pixel 182 data points. The result is a bimodal lightcurve phased to 3.280 scale was 2.26 arcsec in binning 2x2.
    [Show full text]
  • January / February 2010
    JANUARY / FEBRUARY 2010 THE MAGAZINE OF THE AMERICAN ASTRONAUTICAL SOCIETY ISSUE 1 VOLUME 49 SPACE TIMES • January/February 2010 1 AAS OFFICERS PRESIDENT Frank A. Slazer, Northrop Grumman EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT Lyn D. Wigbels, RWI International Consulting Services JANUARY / FEBRUARY 2010 VICE PRESIDENT–TECHNICAL Srinivas R. Vadali, Texas A&M University VICE PRESIDENT–PROGRAMS Kathy J. Nado ISSUE 1–VOLUME 49 VICE PRESIDENT–PUBLICATIONS David B. Spencer, Penn State University VICE PRESIDENT–STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS AND OUTREACH Mary Lynne Dittmar, Dittmar Associates VICE PRESIDENT–MEMBERSHIP Patrick McKenzie, Ball Aerospace T H E M A G A Z I N E O F T H E A M E R I C A N A S T R O N A U T I C A L S O C I E T Y VICE PRESIDENT–EDUCATION Angela Phillips Diaz VICE PRESIDENT–FINANCE Carol S. Lane, Ball Aerospace VICE PRESIDENT–INTERNATIONAL Clayton Mowry, Arianespace, Inc. VICE PRESIDENT–PUBLIC POLICY Peggy Finarelli, George Mason University/CAPR LEGAL COUNSEL Franceska O. Schroeder, Fish & Richardson P.C. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR James R. Kirkpatrick, AAS PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE 3 AAS BOARD OF DIRECTORS FEATURES TERM EXPIRES 2010 Linda Billings, George Washington University Martian Caves May Enable Sustainable Human Ronald J. Birk, Northrop Grumman Rebecca L. Griffin, GriffinSpace LLC Exploration of the Red Planet 4 Hal E. Hagemeier, National Security Space Office The ACCESS Mars report, written by a group of young space professionals Dennis Lowrey, General Dynamics Molly Kenna Macauley, Resources for the Future from the International Space University, tells the tale. Erin Neal, ATK by ACCESS Mars Team (ISU SSP09) Lesa B.
    [Show full text]
  • Biographical Data
    Biographical Data Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center National Aeronautics and Houston, Texas 77058 Space Administration October 2019 TIMOTHY J. (TJ) CREAMER (COLONEL, U.S. ARMY, RET.) NASA ASTRONAUT Follow @Astro_TJ on Twitter PERSONAL DATA: Born November 15, 1959, in Fort Huachuca, Arizona, but considers Upper Marlboro, Maryland, to be his home town. His interests include tennis, running, biking, reading, scuba diving, German language, Russian language and Information Technologies (IT). Both his mother, Mary E. Creamer, and his father, Edmund J. Creamer, Jr., are deceased. EDUCATION: Bishop McNamara High School, Forestville, Maryland, 1978; Bachelor of Science, Chemistry, Loyola College, Baltimore, Maryland, 1982; Master of Science, Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), 1992. ORGANIZATIONS: Alpha Sigma Nu; Phi Kappa Phi; Sigma Pi Sigma; Army Aviation Association of America; Association of the United States Army and the British-American Project. Click photo for downloadable high-res version SPECIAL HONORS: Defense Superior Service Medal; Legion of Merit; Meritorious Service Medal (2nd Oak Leaf Cluster); Army Achievement Medal (1st Oak Leaf Cluster); Air Force Space and Missile Badge; National Defense Service Medal; Distinguished Graduate of the U.S. Army Aviation School, Master Army Aviator, Senior Parachutist, and Jump Master. He is also a recipient of the Russian Federation of Astronautics Yuri Gagarin medal, and the Russian Medal of Merit for Space Exploration. Additionally, he has been awarded the Silver Snoopy, NASA’s Space Flight Medal, NASA’s Outstanding Leadership Medal, and NASA’s Distinguished Service Medal. EXPERIENCE: After Creamer graduated from Loyola College in May 1982, he was commissioned through the Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) program as a second lieutenant in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Aqueous Alteration on Main Belt Primitive Asteroids: Results from Visible Spectroscopy1
    Aqueous alteration on main belt primitive asteroids: results from visible spectroscopy1 S. Fornasier1,2, C. Lantz1,2, M.A. Barucci1, M. Lazzarin3 1 LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, CNRS, UPMC Univ Paris 06, Univ. Paris Diderot, 5 Place J. Janssen, 92195 Meudon Pricipal Cedex, France 2 Univ. Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cit´e, 4 rue Elsa Morante, 75205 Paris Cedex 13 3 Department of Physics and Astronomy of the University of Padova, Via Marzolo 8 35131 Padova, Italy Submitted to Icarus: November 2013, accepted on 28 January 2014 e-mail: [email protected]; fax: +33145077144; phone: +33145077746 Manuscript pages: 38; Figures: 13 ; Tables: 5 Running head: Aqueous alteration on primitive asteroids Send correspondence to: Sonia Fornasier LESIA-Observatoire de Paris arXiv:1402.0175v1 [astro-ph.EP] 2 Feb 2014 Batiment 17 5, Place Jules Janssen 92195 Meudon Cedex France e-mail: [email protected] 1Based on observations carried out at the European Southern Observatory (ESO), La Silla, Chile, ESO proposals 062.S-0173 and 064.S-0205 (PI M. Lazzarin) Preprint submitted to Elsevier September 27, 2018 fax: +33145077144 phone: +33145077746 2 Aqueous alteration on main belt primitive asteroids: results from visible spectroscopy1 S. Fornasier1,2, C. Lantz1,2, M.A. Barucci1, M. Lazzarin3 Abstract This work focuses on the study of the aqueous alteration process which acted in the main belt and produced hydrated minerals on the altered asteroids. Hydrated minerals have been found mainly on Mars surface, on main belt primitive asteroids and possibly also on few TNOs. These materials have been produced by hydration of pristine anhydrous silicates during the aqueous alteration process, that, to be active, needed the presence of liquid water under low temperature conditions (below 320 K) to chemically alter the minerals.
    [Show full text]
  • LPIB Issue 164 (April 2021)
    THE CHICXULUB IMPACT CRATER: Producing a Cradle of Life in the Midst of a Global Calamity Featured Story | From the Desk of Lori Glaze | Meeting Highlights | News from Space | Spotlight on Education In Memoriam | Milestones | New and Noteworthy | Calendar LUNAR AND PLANETARY INFORMATION BULLETIN April 2021 Issue 164 FEATURED STORY THE CHICXULUB IMPACT CRATER: Producing a Cradle of Life in the Midst of a Global Calamity DAVID A. KRING, LUNAR AND PLANETARY INSTITUTE Expedition 364 mission patch Introduction when the International Ocean Discov- an area that had been a stable sediment ery Program (IODP) and International catchment for over 100 million years? Strategically located scientific drilling Continental Scientific Drilling Program Clues began to emerge when the core can be used to tap the Earth for evi- (ICDP) initiated a new campaign with was analyzed. Logging revealed chem- dence of evolutionary upheavals that the call sign Expedition 364. Drilling ical and petrological variations on the transformed the planet. A good example from a marine platform a few meters granitic theme, plus felsite and dolerite is the Yucatán-6 borehole in Mexico above the sea surface, the new borehole intrusions, in a granitoid rock sequence that recovered rock samples from 1.2 reached a depth of 1335 meters be- that represented continental crust that and 1.3 kilometers beneath Earth’s neath the sea floor (mbsf). The borehole had been assembled through a series of surface. I used those samples 30 years penetrated seafloor sediments that bury tectonic events over more than a billion ago to show that a buried, geophysical- the crater, finally reaching impactites at years.
    [Show full text]
  • Geoscientific Research Global Positioning System
    Geoscientific Research and the Global Positioning System Recent Developments and Future Prospects A Report of the University Navstar Consortium Summer, 1994 ii Contents 1 Overview . 1 1.1 State of the Art . 2 1.1.1 Complex Deformation in Plate Boundary Zones. 2 1.1.2 Capturing Earthquakes . 2 1.1.3 Continuously Operating GPS Networks . 4 1.1.4 Volcano Monitoring. 4 1.1.5 Post-Glacial Rebound . 5 1.1.6 Global Climate Change . 5 1.1.7 Ocean Circulation . 6 1.1.8 Atmospheric Sensing . 6 1.1.9 Space-Based GPS Meteorology . 7 1.1.10 Probing the Ionosphere . 7 1.2 The Future . 7 1.2.1 Permanently Operating Networks . 7 1.2.2 Multipurpose National Network . 8 1.2.3 Global Change Research . 8 1.2.4 Space-Based Meteorology . 9 2 Contributors to This Report . 9 3 UNAVCO. 9 4 Scientific Opportunities . 11 4.1 Deformation of the Earth’s Lithosphere . 11 4.1.1 Plate Boundary Processes . 12 4.1.1.1 Mantle Dynamics and Tibet . 14 4.1.1.2 The Pacific-North American Transform Boundary . 14 4.1.1.3 Complexity of Continental Convergence in the Eastern Mediterranean . 14 4.1.1.4 Southeast Asia and Indonesia Tectonics . 17 4.1.1.5 The Interior Western U.S. and the Transition to the Stable Plate Interior . 18 4.1.2 Volcanic Processes . 20 4.1.2.1 Kilauea . 22 4.1.2.2 The Yellowstone Caldera . 23 4.2 The Earthquake Cycle . 24 4.2.1 Loma Prieta . 26 4.3 Deep Earth and Whole Earth Applications .
    [Show full text]