PERIODIC

REVIEW The Tel: 01743 Seven

(ROMP) Huristone 884849 Oaks Fax: AT SURREY, Farm, Transport 01743 OXTED JPHI1 Crew May 884947 1 Green, 0804/D3 2017 Statement RH8 QUARRY, e-mail:

Shrewsbury Partnership OQW office@hurlstones CHALKPIT SY5 9AS corn LANE, PrA/ S asIe& OXTED, 2017 The Huristone Partnership

PERIODICREVIEW(ROMP)ATOXTEDQUARRY,CHALKPITLANE,OXTED, SURREY,RH8OQW

DocumentStatus — 3i Draft

Producedby: J P Hudstone Date: May2017

TransportationPlanning,HighwayDesignand EnvironmentalAssessment

PERIODICREVIEW(ROMP)ATOXTEDQUARRY,CHALKPITLANE,OXTED,SURREY,RHB00W JPH/l 10804!D3 May2017 JPHJ1 May PERIODIC Table Table Table TABLES Table 8 7 9 5 4 12 11 10 6

3 2 CONTENTS 1 2017 10804/03 4.1 4.5 4,3 4.2 SUMMARY Vibration RESIDENTS’ MITIGATION Palmer’s Oxted CUMULATIVE Community Traffic HIGHWAY ENVIRONMENTAL HIGHWAY PROPOSED EXISTING EXISTING PLANNING INTRODUCTION Traffic REVIEW Traffic Daily Traffic Sand Noise HGV Wood Flows Flows Flows (ROMP) Effects/Severance TRAFFIC HIGHWAY SAFETY Pit IMPACT HISTORY Loads DEVELOPMENT & CONCERNS Oilfleld on on

on The IMPACT CONDITIONS Chalkpit Chalkpit Chalkpit AT During IMPACT OXTED FLOWS

NETWORK Huristone Peak Lane Lane Lane QUARRY — — Weeks — September March November CHALKP/T 2007—2011 1St — 7th 31

12th Partnership — LANE. — 2012 131 18th 2016 QXTED, Inclusive 2016 Inclusive Inclusive SURREY, RH8 QQW 34 27 25 21 11 10 22 21 15 15 11 19 17 13 15 II 9 8 4 1 3 1 1 is in at the the the and and into The and also class 2012. site to fertility ROMP To line distance material. infill. regarding “C” Hurlstone from northwest the 2012 the soil May permission undertaken rail fill Regulations suspension. materials Council planting for to north. long a the suspended the 1t inert The are May QQW the accompany to by of the Council and Way immediately improve in waste shrub to planning using County on RHS to relevant scheme of approaching during south and construction inert instructed County temporarily Opinion activities Assessment) Downs land bounded levels Road the site Surrey tree restriction distant. prepared required traffic Woldingham to SURREY, was elements (ROMP) North of total, the is Surrey general restoration km Impact Quarry, ground Scoping existing site a 2 occurring in was width HGV the The a metres with Sites agricultural OXTED, the as areas network. the all between within (EIA) Woldingham land and transport Oxted on 200 has original in of with road used Council’s naturally and to LANE and the Mining which fields to/from Statement scheme. dialogue of Partnership some of of which mid-way (Environmental land spread approximately Quarry. east local back continued acres) being is resulting County under Oxted. Assessment the Lane the (67 as 2016. CHALKP/T highways being ongoing located Oxted Review via materials west. disposal on submission. largely operator Transport which on restoration agricultural Planning to the of activities Surrey well the a site access, each been the agricultural Impact the are area in Lane to Chalkpit October approximately as hectares the to chalk ROMP permission QUARRY, for 2042. Periodic impact site has in Motorway review relating of via Country 27 approved south the to its exporting TED although yield metres Huristone of Limited, of used 1995 M25 there located and Chalkpit the southeast; OX and indicated instruction, south extraction restored and and is planning February 300 produces the crop as northern 93/0765 part Act habitats. the AT as also the 2011; with Limited the be 2012 accessed Environmental 21 this west to Town as Gravel TA to is the with of consists is The to recommenced some an Quarry Quarry the Quarry May known of existing (ROMP) site importing site site would increase end Oxted reinstate Oxted Since The Imports submitted Following Southern Partnership the Environment reference conservation Under accordance site submission, Oxted and extends The INTRODUCTION immediate London 2011, roads The to Oxted The north footpath, The departing and REVIEW 10804/D3 .6 1.8 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.1 1 PERiOD/C May2017 1.2 1.4 1,3 JPH/1 1 May JPH/1 PERIODIC 1.15 1.14 1.13 1.12 1.11 1.10 2017 10804/D3 REVIEW The The permission been restoration In 200,000 report associated permit of Limited Since the As focused importing loads A HGVs entitled considered funded and order 28 significant a site, remainder (ROMP) which Hurlstone loads purchased result of / travelling Surrey was “Consideration has an to 150 2012, on tonnes despite The waste would material and with assist independent / and of AT suggested secured 56 issued HGV element County local of using Partnership current OXTED chalk HGV to a of Oxted to from this be the response Huristone the inert movements. that the objections acceptable on more a Transport movements extraction review, Surrey Council site, of design QUARRY of revised conditions Quarry site could 6 waste review Suggested the recent Limited Surrey for December set empirical be County discussions/negotiations guidance. originally and to currently permit Statement to would of restoration out CHALKPIT imported traffic per This be the that the County was concerns in HGV day deposited Council operator. from remain The network; may traffic cap and 2016 subsequently having suggested Partnership on to details Limits Council LANE, purposes. Hurlstone the collision and be the average survey regarding unrestricted. and and Environment imposed the within no site by average the OXTED, analysed is restrictions effectively Surrey findings data. the annually. data findings considering over Partnership the instructed The with the above upon SURREY for the would site County number HGV of Surrey in Agency, of the year, doubled the in per the which the limits, to the terms local only activity report Council’. ROMP RH8 context annum. review. with update of County imposition which were Southern apply road HGV of QQW the a of associated daily the determination, January of subsequently the network allows quantum The Council movements to the number cap previous of vehicles Gravels revised extant a up of 2016 limit with has has 2 75 of to of The Huristone Partnership

2 PLANNINGHISTORY

2.1 Itis understoodthat chalkextractionfromthe site dates backmorethan 150years. The originalplanningpermissionfor chalk extractionwas an InterimDevelopmentOrder consent granted in 1941. This was subsequentlyregisteredunder the Planningand CompensationAct1991andgiventhe referenceTA92/0070.

2.2 In 1993an appilcationwas made to SurreyCountyCouncil(Surrey)by Tilconfor the determinationof modern planning conditionsas required under the Planningand CompensationAct 1991. There were no planningconditionsattached to the original permissionwhichcontrolledthedevelopmentat the site.

2.3 Newplanningconditionswereissued bySurreyon 11June 1997(referenceTA93/0765) and were accompaniedby approvedplans showingthe then extentof extraction,the operationalphases and the restorationcontours.The conditionsallowforextractionand infillingto be carriedout until2042.

2.4 The 1997 planningconditionsplace no restrictionsin terms of the rate at whichthe

remainingchalkreserves,whichextendto approximatelyover 1 milliontonnes, maybe exported. Similarly,there is no restrictionon the rate of infillthat may be imported (althoughthe existingEnvironmentAgencypermitspecifiesup to 200,000tonnes per annum). Based on the existingchalkreservesand availablevoidspace, approximately 800,000cubicmetresofinfillwouldbe requiredto achievetheapprovedrestorationinthe eventallchalkreservesare extracted.

2.5 As a resultof the flexiblenatureof the extantplanningpermissionintermsof extraction and importation,there is no restrictionon the numberof vehiclemovementsassociated

withoperationsat OxtedQuarry.Themovementofvehiclesis limitedto between07:00—

18:00Mondayto Fridayand 07:00— 15:00on Saturdayswithnogoodsvehiclesentering or leavingthe site on a Sundayor PublicHoliday,as specifiedincondition9 oftheextant planningpermission.

2.6 The extant planning permissionalso provides (or the preventionof depositionof extraneousmatteron the highway(condition5); the sheetingand trimmingof loaded vehicles(condition6);agreed improvementsto the accesses to ChalkpitLane(condition 7);and restrictionstothe pointsofaccess to ChalkpitLane(condition8).

2.7 Chalkis primarilysoldforspreadingon agriculturallandand as a generalfill.Historically there was extensivechalkprocessingcarriedout on site to producehydratedlimeand powders. In morerecentyears annualsales of chalkhave been almost40,000tonnes and inertinfillhas been almost100,000tonnes per year untilthe recentincreaseinthe EnvironmentalPermit,whichallowsupto 200,000tonnesperyearto be infilled.

PERIODICREVIEW(ROMP)ATOXTEDQUARRY,CHALKPITLANE.OXTED,SURREY,RH800W 3 JPH/110804/D3 May2017 JPHh May PERIODIC 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.1 3 2017 10804/03 REVIEW except condition. arranged which Immediately overhanging combination the comparable to requirements right Visibility the 120m tree/branch to gated The from convex considered development, visibility 63.8m of to Visibility serving the an The north County access where which many infrequently Oxted EXISTING the the the the area near centreline quarry, northern (ROMP) southern the is between has centreline to north. far entrance years access. is to for Quarry the mirror Council Oxted to at future. at of vegetation at the

in The site for edge the grown Chalkpit access, the the the hard-standing frequent historically. which a splay AT M25 to HIGHWAY the and of and the left access The extends centreline specified number access but opposite Quarry, site the from is northern the access of OXTED would the The and with highway within visibility from served is kerbing Chalkpit to mirror crosses remains carriageway

are Huristone access to north Lane highway located the use, the within 67m comparable extends a prevent extends approximately prevent of there set a extends QUARRY, the the by width access of right is It NETWORK same of 4m by years between lies on to splay between installed was is back Lane splay missing Chalkpit the as site above the the the two is approximately the below set was 19.7m alignment, to general of previously is contiguous 19.7m extant edge ago. 2Cm access, noted position. northern was far the to to 8,6m verge access use opposite area CHALKPIT splay back 7.3m, measured these the Chalkpit be edge and as the desirable Lane. south, along to measured and by 57m It along would that and planning cleared part use left position. the edge to is is area. normal which which two points access of which

entrance accepted Partnership understood side access understood the The from from the there have near approximately by Forward of LANE, the the 17Cm be Lane. to accesses, of standards right a near is HGV of in is carriageway to vehicles. extend to constraint required a western the permission. Chalkpit includes Visibility edge, scheme there an was understood It 2.4m the accordance to set OXTED. extend further Chalkpit gates. when extends edge is north opening traffic. visibility a The carriageway. a to that back dwelling understood 32.7m is 37m set-back although post and to edge have Lane a of of a 8C.lm activities to 29Cm to and SURREY, other to the achieve 6 Lane. Chalkpit sharp to from 4.2m 48.9m works Signage is the to that towards width foot the The to visibility of been with the 75m mirror and restricted located be the to to position Chalkpit access, the it north. historically 6 left from removal near that bend, related the The has the at undertaken of the to the the AkëW The from damaged inch centreline Lane 2.4m is to a the the 7.3mm to accords north immediately approved near entrance not the existing main edge to vehicle the the constraint width by There at the and the Lane. site which near and to be set-back. been of the operator neighbouring carriageway. edge, south of supported the south. site and replaced by left have vegetation and vegetation addition also restriction the centreline by edge emerging is with planning There dwelling splay gates used a is access, 8Cm was a of 75.5m Surrey 41.3m to falling bridge has to been used The third has The and the the the the 4 for of to in to to a is a a a a a is is in 5 of to of of as the the the the into with near mph end, 3.5m north 9.5% via 230m either of would of with Oxted. side Way, mph 40 north and north to chicane 104m footpath which the dwellings dwellings and a leads of pedestrian M25 south, footway 40 into to the the south north character is carriageway to within north junction bridge of to northern width walkers to Heading to limit the ahead the public a traffic, the the the GQW Way south and the its extends the way several access Gordon’s a splay to there 4m to via at to of Way, access over road approximately limit is verge RH8 of are bend speed Lane into pedestrian Lane along The evidence line Quarry. increases the 21% a the the the Heading down Gordon’s oncoming rights northern direct in carriageway speed Road, there be There of on However, distance south limit crosses clear Pilgrims’ Green 6m Continuing the SURREY, to minimum Chalkpit Oxted railway is with which along mph bend Way. a public hedgerow walk a of bend to south at short and towards guidance. transition Green near along which speed 30 to no wood. a available the distant. the Barrow Limpsfleld. the there the from 4.9m. east OXTED. nature continues point the limit for by 4.3m are the the mph west To eId, measured access (west) and in the beneath of design 12.6% continues vary and Barrow Vanguard the traffic, appear 1.1km of 30 to LANE, the is Lane towards to which Beyond was there as right speed although Lane main itself. site the Partnership with urban of south restricts between and obscured north passes current travelling 4.22m of northbound. footway the that the the Lane If the route, beyond bend end Way to north, of of more Chalkpit the onwards and CHALKPIT To pedestrians Chalkpit which (4.2Gm). measured varies the the approximately junction land feature continuing to the approximately partially against into Way. and of T to on travelling that bend presence south indicates to is feet is south carriageway. Chalkpit was eastern pedestrian mph. Lane and S held Gordon’s bridge, Wood 14 links becomes on the side the the the QUARRY between 30 approximately 4.7m the position. centre land an gateway The carriageway Lane of to of reveal priority (east) which the to with to Pilgrims’ to to ridge a reduces at its M25 vehicles and Way TED east the mapping Huristone in considered the to left of Chalkpit as to site the the OX Chalkpit the sides or access Lane of gradient 50m junction the Road, follows of drivers Way) on the between distant. Chalkpit of AT east acts reduces junction when gradient on the to clearance both gradient. Survey of changes priority increasing edge connect Lane the Wood at The certainly width the access Green on alerts reaching crossing 325m The to south to north varies lane Chalkpit Greensands southern to uphill (ROMP) maximum width chicane gives route near bend, the the the before Beyond Chalkpit headroom acceptable before introduced bridge Barrow Ordnance Chalkpit activity, traffic M25. Oxted Visibility the further Observations cross along distant. The bend. to (Greensands access 20% nominal located The The to the order at and Approximately the width REVIEW 10804/D3 2017 3.6 3.9 3.11 3.10 3.7 3.8 3.12 PERIODIC JPH/1 May JPH/1 May2017 PERIODIC 3.18 3.17 3.16 3.15 3.14 3.13 108 04/03 REVIEW would At reduce between 7.Sm. to right Along street Measurements Continuing to the offside junction residual route, south. Church The measured towards drivers Green from The Pedestrian passes Bluehouse and width the see between Road before Heading limit distant. extends Barrow Barrow be East the carriageway. shadow (ROMP) the priority at an imposed, northern Bluehouse 8,15m parking the which roundabout, enters reduce varies the edge Parking the Road turning the Hill Lane overtaking Green Parking width Green beneath is Church oncoming to 6.2m east The 6.65m majority Taking and effective the junction. south footways Lane Gordon’s the Road. route AT area of wide, take junction has between bays the would from access the section the found and from the Lane Road taken rail bays OXTED and bays Lane/Bluehouse form towards Lane a are The up an into at more of restriction although parking residual Huristone vehicle reducing bridge, the Church traffic width 7.lm. East railway Barrow reduce the A extend the some between 5.05m to initial likely for are Way at the to to carriageway with account left of Chalkpit (west) QUARRY 4.55m be junction urbanised length a various Oxted a Hill to provided the and Church priority turn junction short acceptable to width which bays carriageway The is four-arm restricted Lane width bridge along to Green along between when the in Road be roundabout, considered the to 6.2m left and terms leads of railway the occupation Lane residual and distance. infrequent. of follows points CHALKPIT continues Church has route. Lane this rail to cars both the Lane along on Road at with climbs 6.3m the area 5.75m minimum opposing roundabout 4.lm 5.3m into junction of waiting the bridge a link when 0,4km the station. sides junction, are speed the on space. 14 a width To extends a effectively Bluehouse of between to Partnership access Station Lane the there east from height at relatively feet at along parked LANE, the of view in However, the considered Oxted, be and of section one carriageway times along the kerb a the to limit width the acceptable, 3 side link (south). is north Due the However, southerly where to 4.5m junction with Road to point inches approximately restriction the OXTED, a kerbs, Gordon’s marked within carriageway, remains the reduces look junction the recreation are reveal Barrow sharp to of Lane, (4.55m) of The of the initial Station when and the West near the Church against the recreation the marked straight (4.34m) which Immediately the in view carriageway SURREY, the width direction left on-street alignment the 5.6m, route route junction, between Green as Visibility combination to lane occupied. section and of Way and marked and residual Road ground hand 30 towards overtaking carriageway current increases Lane 12 reduces which ahead on 295m in has height continuing which, between junction. ground mph Road, meandering feet RH8 terms by the bend and of 6.3m parking Barrow at and of a on-street on width to effectively is design width the as from into its the nominal 6 the limit, 00W east to when with the lit. East the the of when when its was manoeuvres inches and Gordon’s Barrow 215m 6.5m far priority junction Church width ahead being between west Green continuation bays carriageway Immediately the some east then side the guidance. 6.9m. measured Hill traffic occupied, bays, nature travelling travelling width with 40 turning length. Barrow (3.8m). side able varies would of of Green Road. varies route, leads Road 186m Lane Way was mph lane on- the the the the 6 of of to of in 7 is to to at the the the and and was The with ATC A25. initial cycle some Hill assist speed Green on vehicle current right Chalkpit centres, in between which the to junctions the preparing Hill. The subject descends Lane the on intermittent the of and on 2012: month, is between junction of to dip Barrow meanders along then signage Hillest when along West Road, verges COW its it of carriageway, based Sandy mirrors the by which March (ATC) bend the equestrian mph of neutral hazards as East RHB volumes junction the a Motorway. carriageway On-carriageway along crests a Green width 40 exception of route, beyond footways A25 is the during convex to along Therefore1 between M25 road length bottom Counter the presence no the acceptable the follows potential and SURREY, its dwellings, is Barrow direcfion the its the to junction. nominal along The directional have which are with roundabout 2012. the length to to then walking along alignment Traffic recorded the in to and increases The along of under there OXTED, 2008, some the 2012, towards climb, Beyond ATC walking records 425m limit 6m connects directions alerted Lane southwest to four-arm people to west and drivers be May the a and dip. the accesses bridge of LANE, distant. lit are and distributed ATC the Automatic roundabout junction. to a both the in March route Due suspended speed Partnership alert in direction from to the not begins since 2km the The into the to along 4.6m is the of Road from drivers Tandridge various drivers rises restricted evidence reaching CHALKP/T route from Hill length. results route. observed road Road, is junction Farm. and permanent north data sporadically and temporarily its the Council. the a the Road, provided periods. East provided continually Hill junction, some the north also directs The are the before A25 as descending is east north-easterly at are were Green has the 2012, the approximately to QUARRY, brief along FLOWS was dip along East a the A25 approximately incorporates were is the County At in mph link heads accesses which of for in on TED before from to Oxted. signs the limit Huristone recording 50 Quarry slight Barrow summarises etc. Visibility OX There located Lane Road/Oxted Council end activity which a to Road 2km Surrey people report onto is between AT briefly and been of several footway TRAFFIC land junction. speed Oxted towards provided below problems Warning and A generally T from at Road. descends Lane. Lane, The out right Green has to Green County guidance. Lane which southern varies are mph chmbs Hill Godstone increases table previous pedestrian A25 and the 40 priority Imports the Barrow Surrey Lane The East Sandy EXISTING obtained Chalkpit locations and classifications. Road undulates a visibility visibility. counter technical Barrow agricultural lanes approximately a The limit into section. Turning route Chalkpit design continue A25 At V/EW(ROMP) RE 10804!D3 JPH/1 May2017 4.2 PERIOD/C 3.22 4.1 4.3 4 3.20 3.21 3.19 JPH/I 4.8 May PERIODIC 4.7 4.6 4.4 XX 18 Southbound Direction..., Northbound Hour= = Total 2017 Total “- 108 Time 04/03 06.00— Vehdes REVIEW(ROMP) on 2011 combined of a Waste movements highest of Traffic peod In flow As than work. which inclusive. movements which recorded. of During PM Friday Table Table 24:00 week 7 terms 2588 1411 Hour 27h the the 690 721 can (6) (2) (4) 24 (YY) Day peak of those revealed represents 4.1 is data 4.1 and M25 local was was 1160 June be hourly the commencing movements. Average of

consistent The HGVs hours above Traffic HGV seen averaged the Restoration The 1199 were recorded Hour 1559 AM was found 608 591 AT road (6) (4) (2) movements at 12 12 2011 flow that with:r traffic Hour= OXTED were comparable weekends from flow peak relatively indicates recorded. 0.7% (Monday movements network Flows to

lhe Huristone for with prepared Toal over Peak Table along 0700—1900 was found attracled be 131 The 14 AM (0) (1) (1) 60 71 the hour average of QUARRY, report. typical Vehicles on 48, northbound the the May average week varied found low that — 4.1, Barrow is to a Chalkpit Sunday) PM which total in 5 of fall total lower to in AM the 2011 The daily day Peak the 127 was association which PM (1) (0) (1) 59 68 CHALKPIT to peak between absolute Oxted between flow. total combined and Green working traffic report of equates be number revealed also and than Lane 23(1.5%) hour 166 AM 63 PM volume

Quarry, Partnership 1428 flows recorded 1559 Hour Road confirmed (23) (13) (10) 766 30 793 terms. Peak 08:00 movements are 24 LANE, — peak movements week. flow with of to March number in aS southbound, = HGV averaged recorded of 1.9% was 5 weighbridge 2009 08:00 — periods was were the OXTED, Day traffic The day This 09:00 on 1536 Hour 1st (23) that (13) reported movements (10) 755 781 of Oxted 18 —09:00 of 146 (15 Average the classified average 24 — on is HGV including using the for surveys and over 31st SURREY, between because same in/iS hour movements Wednesday resulting commuters Sand data total in movements 2012 17:00 1321 Hour the (21) (10) (11) Chalkpit 656 665 (Monday 12 flow out) 12 the day associated as undertaken PM obtained 7 volume. 2 Pit the hour RH8 Inclusive Monday Transport — day HGVs. and between when (1.2%) in Peak 18:00 Infilling number including Lane a Peak 00W travelling 18th period —_Friday) 166 (07:00 AM (2) (1) (1) 76 90 56 combined over = a from 17.00— The The respectively, with in HGVs total and to by May. Monday Statement with the of 2008 are the — ATC 2008 AM the 1 highest vehicle to/from of 19:00) 18:00 Friday Peak same 146 HGV, lower PM (1) (0) (1) north 78 68 were Inert total The 376 site (28 and for 8 to to The Huristone Partnership

in/28out), In2010and 2011,the averagedailyHGVflowswere44(22 in/22out)and46 (23 in/23out)respectively.The dailyaverage is based on 275workingdays per annum and allowingforpublicholidaysand plannedshutdownperiods.

4.9 On Wednesday 18thMay2011, when the highest numberof HGVmovementswas recordedon BarrowGreenRoad,OxtedQuarryattracted26 loads,resultingin 52 HGV movementsonthe localroadnetwork.

4.10 The peak weeks of activityduringeach year between2007 and 2011 inclusivewere identifiedfromthe weighbridgedata, whichprovidedthefollowinginformation.

Table4.2 DailyHGVLoadsDurinqPeak Weeks2007—2011 Dates Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Total 14-l8February2Oll 30 47 48 70 69 0 264 07-11March2011 71 82 64 8 42 0 267 14-18March20hl 73 86 90 60 42 0 351 21-25March2011 17 34 53 91 64 0 259

25-29July2011 91 86 75 63 1 33 0 348 22-26August20l1 43 86 70 53 62 0 314 12-l6April2O1O 181 52 56 63 36 0 388 07-11December2009 67 70 61 59 61 0 318 08-12September2008 66 76 62 64 73 0 341 22-26September2008 56 66 78 73 69 0 342 29 Sept-04 Oct2008 71 67 70 65 69 30 342 06-10October2008 71 68 84 81 76 0 380 20-24October2008 77 81 76 74 72 0 380 27-31October2008 70 71 88 76 25 0 330 03-07October2007 65 82 76 91 92 0 406 AboveFlowsto DoubledtoObtainTotalDailyHGVMovements

4.11 The reviewof the weighbridgedata confirmedthat the busiestday of activityat Oxted Quarrythroughoutthe periodconsideredbetween2008and 2011was 362 movements (181in/ 181out)on 12thApril2010.

4.12 As can be seen fromTable4.2 above, the peak dailyflowof 181loads/362movements was exceptionalin terms of throughputand was arounddoublethe levelof the next

highestdailytotalof 92 loads/184 movements,whichoccurredon 1 day1and 91 loads/ 182movements,whichoccurredon 3 days.

4.13 Followinghistoricmeetingsand discussionswithSurreyCountyCouncil,SouthernGravel instigateda routingprotocolwhichsplitsthe numberof HGVmovementsalongBarrow GreenRoad. Theroutingprotocol,whichis imposedon allHGVdriversvisitingthe site, is to approachvia the A25/BarrowGreen Road roundaboutto travel northeastalong BarrowGreen Road beforeturningleftintoChalkpitLanethen leftintothe site. When leavingOxtedQuarry,HGVdriversmustturnrightandtravelsouthalongChalkpitLaneto the junctionwithBarrowGreenRoad,at whichpointthey mustturn leftand traveleast alongthat routeto ChurchLane. Havingturnedrightonto ChurchLaneat the end of

PERIODICREVIEW(ROMP)ATOXTEDQUARRY,CHALKPITLANE,OXTED,SURREY,RHA00W 9 JPH/I10804/03 May2017 ‘- JPH/1 May PERIODIC 4.19 4.18 XX 4.17 18 Southbound 4.16 Direction” Northbound 4.15 4.14 Hour = Total 2017 Total 10804/D3 = Time 06:00— Vehicles REVIEW was Table servicing operational, was A It (102 Table from September. the Updated travelling towards Chalkpit As Pit, Green accommodate connects along along the It Barrow 24:00 7Day 1687 Hour is is review (26) (14) (12) 870 817 24 t) a the site) A25 operational. (ROMP) understood recorded northbound/lb apparent the 4.4 result the 4.3 either Road = latter Average Green at Lane. Oxted other and HGVs The traffic of along below Council. Traffic narrow to the 1424 Hour (20) (11) 729 695 the AT (9) of 12 there 12 section of a on to within the premises/land. the priority Hour from the Road, week A OXTED which Quarry. survey that Barrow data summarises be (Monday Wednesday sections Flows week HGV Huristone is = routing existing Total 212 Table this Peak 07:00— the of southbound) 162 AM from (2) (1) provided (1) 79 83 junction. was still drivers OUARRY of information Barrow traffic Green Vehicles on routing movements survey It survey — closed of regular November 4.3 agreement, is 19:00 Chalkpit Syp4y)_ Barrow the bus continue therefore in 18th by Peak Road below 155 Green PM (1) protocol (0) 87 68 terms CHALKPIT data results data when of Surrey routes May HGV has which Green Lane is between 2016 from summarises of above, AM Road across the of unrelated apparent 2011, for been was the Partnership activity 1893 Hour County (32) (17) (15) 972 921 Peak the and 24 — 1 LANE, surveys September (after Road. the northbound geometric September and agreed 26 63 the obtained 08:00 that = 5 period was 08:00 along Day a reduce imports OXTED, Council would to HGV roundabout The were the even substantial 1862 Hour (29) (16) (13) 960 902 either in — 18 —0900 Average considered in 2016 order layout 09:00 route survey movements from Chalkpit vehicle have undertaken. 1 November the SURREY, had when confirms 21h Oxted (prior to to —1 potential of 1593 on Surrey Hour (25) (12) 814 779 resumed) into travelled (Monday 12 halve results proportion the was the 8th Oxted Monday PM Lane Quarry to more East RH8 the east 2016 highway. 2016, recorded a Peak imports the County HGV. for for Peak peak Quarry OQW 203 —_Friday) associated northeast 105 AM of were Hill (2) (1) 98 (1) potential Inclusive = or appropriate 12 HGVs of when the Chalkpit 17:00 Road Oxted resuming houdy September HGV Council on purchased period was — the to 18:00 Barrow Peak impact bound to 179 104 PM (1) (1) (0) traffic 75 Sand meet Lane with flow site not join 10 on to in to The Huristone Partnership

3th Table4.4TrafficFlowson ChalkpitLane— November7thI 2016Inclusive

N Time 7 DayAverage(Monday— Sunday) 5 DayAverage(Monday—_Friday) 24 12 AM PM 24 18 12 AM PM DirectiorI’, Hour Hour Peak Peak Hour Hour Hour Peak Peak Southbound 832 719 87 67 931 917 799 112 71 (14) (12) (1) )__ (17) (16) (14) (1) (1) Northbound 867 736 78 86 948 935 801 99 99 (14) (11) (1) (1) (16) (15) (13) (1) (1) Total 1699 1455 165 153 1879 1852 1600 211 176 (28) (23) (2) (2) (33) (31) (27) (2) (1) XX= TotalVehicles (YY)= HGVswlhinTolalVehicles 18Hour= 06:00—24: 12Hour=07:00—19:00 AMPeak = 08:00—09:00 PMPeak 17:00—18:00

4.20 The data providedby SurreyCountyCouncilconfirmsthe peak hourlyflowduringthe

Novembersurveywas between 08:00 — 09:00 on Tuesday 8h Novemberwhen 228 vehiclemovementswere recorded (107 northboundll2l southbound),of which3 (1 northbound/2southbound)wereHGVs,

421 Weighbridgedata was obtainedfromOxtedQuarryfor the period07 — 13 November 2016,whichconfirmed12 loads were deliveredon Monday7th, 7 loads on Tuesday8 and 5 loads on Wednesday9h November2016. Of these, onlyone occurredduring either the AMor PMpeak hour periodson 08 November,whichwas recordedat the weighbridgeat 08:45,and wouldhave accountfor 2 of the three HGVmovementson ChalkpitLanewithinthe peakhourofflowduringthesurveyperiod.

422 We are advisedthat since the beginningof January2017untilthe Easter BankHoliday weekending14thApril2017,the site has typicallyreceivedbetween50 and 60 loads/ 100 and 120 HGVmovementsper day withthe busiestday being78 loads/ 156 HGV movements. Sincethen, activityhas reducedto between10 and 30 loads/ 20 and 60 HGVmovementsper day as many of the jobs supplyingfillto Oxted Quarryhave temporarilystoppeddigging.

5 HIGHWAYSAFETY

5.1 In order to reviewthe safety performanceof the localroad network,collisiondata was obtainedfromSurreyCountyCouncil,whichextendedalongthe A25betweenthe East HillRoad and BarrowGreen Road junctions;alongthe lengthof BarrowGreen Road, ChurchLaneand East HillRoad;along ChalkpitLaneto the junctionwithThe Ridge; alongthe fulllengthofThe Ridgeand alongNodhdownRoadto itsjunctionwithChurch Road.

5.2 The originalROMPreportconsideredcollisiondata forthe preferred5 year periodfrom 01 February2007to 31January2012, Withinthatperiodtherewere3 collisionsinvolving HGVs.

PERIODICREVIEW(ROMP)ATOXTEDQUARRY,CHALKPITLANE,OXTED,SURREY,P1-1800W 11 JPH/l 10804/D3 May2017 May2017 JPH/1 PERIODIC 5.10 5,9 5.8 5.7 5.6 5.5 5.4 5.3 10804/D3 REVIEW residents, drivers The the use Barrow standards, provided by The during has may network As It information Council roads relatively A25IBarrow involving that significantly and It collision In In seriously to travelling HGV with the bend In provided In was is April HGV June stop. September the site part by good not traffic HGV (ROMP) share filling the also not to driver to found the other within Green has event led 2007 comprising the of the occurred. nearside from traffic 2011 to The HGVs heavily were injured. safety be north a The additional noted it data it similar station available. this not to compromises drivers south 20mph AT north. appears Green had is that HGVs ideally a and Road 01 there a apparent car associated travelling a 2010 led reveals OXTED collision all along review, record significant that there seen trafficked of HGV characteristics. January of outside opposite occurred Huristone The to ran unrelated Road maximum Barrow visiting the is period Oxted there that is unacceptable suited two Chalkpit attached the have QUARRY, that operator associated into collided car, updated a that occurred from and the safety, of with the particular car considered. was route Green 2012 problem Quarry the there in resulting the Church been the to to the east rear Tandridge different on site. Lane. driver Oxted the to site. HGV with HGV a historic has CHALKPIT collision that it local collisions to is between no the The Road, to of collision with is at safety quarry clearly A in Lane 30 west in photographs common recorded characteristic a the speed approaching is Site The Quarry The and access route terms locations roads review slight the cyclist level constructed November Chalkpit Partnership Lane, HGV impacts. through data during from Rules, details Site a the a LANE, site occurred between and map car level injury is of of and revealed to when injury at collision travelling resulting is has requested.” Rules use highway and the and did find the which OXTED, Lane, assisted showing indicate the of the of other at to of when 2016, been not A25. had to accidents historic temporary the a HGV a compared on the speed junction, roundabout provide number the that a HGV advise: Church see resulted activities. in safety. notably westbound incident the car SURREY, higher Oxted obtained the as by the which slight Based local the the use and driver. classified travelling The a the car on a entry of ‘In suspension three car Lane HGV with different standard of Quarry code in injury. had and routing highway incidents the was Similarly, Site driver junction consideration on RH8 Whilst the was from the on and and recorded until local stopped modem confirmed the of Rules the highway A25, south OQW the car was turning approached Both and characteristics. Surrey exit East conduct the than it collision road in network of between most the A25 driver was operational which also the Site routes local imports the and when desirable Hill collisions the right ongoing network network that to collided too County locality recent cyclist state: Rules to Road a being local road local data is that late via into 12 the the car the the all to a The Huristone Partnership

“Anydriversfoundto be inbreachofanyofthese ruleswillbe askedtoleavethesiteand willnotbe allowedto return’

5.11 The evidenceof use of the site and lackof incidentsis demonstrativethat in termsof highwaysafety, the proposed development,whichsimplyseeks to maintaincurrent activitiesthroughoutthe permittedperiod,is acceptable. The evidencebased approach to appraisalof highwaysafetyis supportedby ManualforStreets2 (MfS2).Ashas been identified,the visibilityprovisionat the site access is belowdesirablestandardsbut has notledtocollisionsinrecentyears,despitetheclearand frequentuse.

5.12 Paragraph 10.5.9 of MfS2 advises: “The Y distance should be based on the recommendedSSD values. However,based on the researchreferredto above, unless there is localevidenceto the contra,y,a reductionin visibilitybelowrecommendedlevels willnotnecessarilylead toa significantproblem.”

5.13 Thisis reiteratedin an articlecontainedinthe November2010editionof Transportation Professional,the magazineof the CharteredInstitutionof Highwaysand Transportation. The CoverStoryarticle“ManualforStreets 2’, whichquotes AlanYoung,the principle authorof MIS1and MfS2:“Theadviceis to lookat speed first.then detailedassessment of local contextand vehicleand pedestriancollisionrecords.If there is a problemof safety, deal withit as appropriate;if collisionrecords are acceptable,avoidrigorous followingofstandardsandfocusonthequalityoftheplace.”says Mr.Young.”Thearticle concludeswitha furtherquotation“ThisresearchcombinedwithwhaLsbeen recognised beforesuggestsgreatervisibilitycouldbe increasinghazards,buttheimportantmessage is donotget hunguponstandards. Beflexibleandmakedecisionsbased on evidence.

5.14 Thisflexibleapproachis reiteratedthroughoutMf52,whichraises concernsoverslavish adherence to guidanceregardlessof localcontext. For example,in paragraph2.8.2, whenconsideringruralareas, the guidancestates: “Thereis a considerablevariationin the highwaynetworkrunningthroughruralareas frommotonvaysto Green Lanes. The majorityof otherruralroads followoldpathwaysand boundariesand do not conformto present guidanceon highwaystandards. Indeed to attemptto do so couldbe to the detrimentof local character and lead to intrusioninto some of our most outstanding landscapes.’

5.15 The safetyrecordon the routesconsideredis likelyto be a resultof the predominantly localnatureofdriversusingthe minorroadnetwork,whichdoes notrepresentan obvious through-routeto longer distance through-traffic. Localdriverswillbe aware of the constraints and potentialhazards along the route. Conversely,due to its varying geometry,driversunfamiliarwiththe routescouldbe expectedto exercisea significant degreeofcautionwhentravellingalongthe localroads.

6 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT

6.1 Interms of transportand highwaymatters,the proposeddevelopmentat OxtedQuarry simplyseeks to maintaintheongoingactivitiesintermsofchalkextractionand restoration inaccordancewiththeextantplanningpermissionthatextendsto2042.

PERIODICREVIEW(ROMP)ATOXTEDQUARRY,CHALKPITLANE,OXTED,SURREY,RHB00W 13 JPHIII0804/D3 May2017 May JPH/1 PERIODIC 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.5 6.4 6.3 6.2 2017 10804/D3 REVIEW pethaps 60 movements represent local historic operational When It will limit materials, County the impact significant Table In to movements By the tonnes Based overall be 250 Based result The is such be movements limited comparing result same total (ROMP) working noteworthy recent authority of an 4.2 in taking whilst on activities traffic upon per Council circumstances, 100 average 150 The daily additional 17 loads in an the above, activity adverse perspective annum, increase of AT have any days tonne the loads/200 during annual an into at confirmed historic 500 per the flow OXTED out that wish at site material slack of average it on per account been day Huristone the total impacts and payload, is this 10 exceeds HGV any of occasional average in remains a annual to apparent annum site. based QUARRY, loads/20 the daily the and periods 300 it of equates HGV “About given accommodated impose is change movements payload permitted 57 site, in the would A per not HGV flow chalk on the active. of terms (assuming meeting day. loads/i movements that 250 foregoing, week — Saturdays HGV anticipated 50 the a CHALKPIT to a movements level of to therefore 5 distributed production of limit Ioads/100 of an lam,’ there day figures 50 the level movements 14 respectively, highway over note 17 average identified loads/100 on working local a loads on Partnership movements have tonnes of 5 at the LANE, per from the be that HGV should day the imports the associated of HGV highway over acceptable. per capacity operator been year, day of the 40,000 working week. site). 18 local above. OXTED, per movements per 47 HGV week which movements be June SE. ongoing could to day. numerous with but loadslY4 vehicle, road network doubled 200,000 or tonnes has movements at with week, 1959 England.’ represent SURREY. not It safety. the peak be network is operations agreed Chalk necessarily associated between historic the also per accommodated movements noting in per examples to tonnes periods terms obtain RH8 annum importing day, export 100 apparent without is that there As flows comparable per the 00W at movements of with go the should an with of these are and Oxted traffic operator annum out per tends days identified resulting a of increase total that calculated assuming importing daily (down day from 200,000 figures flow Quarry Surrey to where these would HGV with over and and only cap 14 an to or in in in The Huristone Partnership

7 HIGHWAYIMPACT

7.1 The reviewundertakenrevealsthat the road networkdoes have certainconstraintsin terms of its width,alignmentand visibilityin some locations. Notwithstandingthese apparentconstraints,the collisiondata providedbySurreyCountyCouncilindicatesthat the recenthistoricactivitiessince2007havenotledtoa significanthighwaysafetyissue.

7.2 The local roads in the area have generallylowvolumesof traffic,whichundoubtedly assists in maintaininga goodsafetyrecordbynaturallylimitingthe likelihoodof vehicles meetingonthe narrowersectionsofthe route.

7.3 The peak hour flows on ChalkpitLane when the site was not operationalof 212 movementsinSeptember2016maybe comparedwiththe capacityofa singletrackroad with passing places. A study undertaken by the Transportand Roads Research Laboratory(TRRL)nowTRLconsideredthe capacityof singletrackroadscarryingtraffic flowsof between50and 300movementsper hour.

7.4 The findingsof the studyadvise: “Resultsfromthe TRRLstudies indicatethat simplyin terms of their capacity for canying moving trafficsingle lane cardageways, correctly designed, are unlikelyto incursignificantincreases in delaycomparedwithtrafficin free flowconditions,at flowlevelsofup to 300 vph(totaltwo-way)’

7.5 Inthiscase, muchofChalkpitLaneis wideenoughfortwocars to pass each other,which increasescapacityand reducesdelay. Therelativelylownumberof HGVmovementsper day (up to 57 loads/114movementson average)equates to just 10-11movementsper

hour,or 1 movementevery5- 6 minutes. Basedon the advisory20 mphspeed limitfor

drivers,it wouldtake between2 — 3 minutesto travelbetweenthe site access and the junctionbetween ChalkpitLane and BarrowGreen Road, By consideringthe typical journeytimeand average numberof HGVstogether,it is apparentthat the potentialfor HGVsto meet alongthe narrowersectionsof the routeare naturallylimitedby the low trafficvolumes.

1.6 Havingconsideredthe baselinetrafficvolumesand those associatedwithoperationsat OxtedQuarry,itis apparentthat the cumulativetotalflowshouldnot breachthe capacity ofChalkpitLane.

8 ENVIRONMENTALIMPACT

TrafficNoise

8.1 Intermsof EnvironmentalImpact,trafficnoiseis oftenidentifiedas a significantconcern whereHGVtrafficmovementsare beingconsidered. Inorderto establishthe likelynoise impactof the proposeddevelopment,the BasicNoiseLevel(BNL)has been calculated

PERIODICREVIEW(ROMP)ATOXTEDQUARRY,CHALKPITLANE,OXTED,SURREY,RH800W 15 JPH/l10804/03 May2017 May JPH/1 PERIODIC 8.8 8.7 8.6 8.5 8.4 8.3 8.2 2017 10804/D3 REVIEW(RQMP) Table falls the Tables negligible permanent “3.5 or threshold 3 being (DMRB) required flows In increases 66.3 weighbridge The By 60.7 increases respectively. junction annum of gradients By Adopting Based of Three The considers 12%, using d8 an terms traffic 114 short comparing comparing Determining within BNL dB(A) Mb, baseline existing dB(A), without which met. 3.2, 3.1 calculations on the and HGVs Volume with for and The was calculations criterion of change a equate were equate the traffic the and the change at 18/i The lower procedure exports AT new the of represents 63.0 long level Barrow the the observed the based these range per BNL same 362 3.2 OXTED 58.6 change threshold volume, 11, significance the road speed comparable to to over quarry term for dB(A) BNLs above Huristone day in of were of HGV 4.6 between which was appropriate dB(A), of results Green magnitude traffic on change HD213/11 were chalk the schemes QUARRY, detailed periods dB(A), based 1 the in traffic would with operating, composition, the and movements calculated 0.3 undertaken —2.9 longer criteria advises the also induced 60.8 range Road. at with mm/s 2.1 default and gradients of falls 63.5 flows 4.8 long reduce 40,000 on respectively. dB(A), contained level repeated of summarise in this to CHALKPIT dB(A) term the without used dB(A) along the at within is 2.2 I dB(A) In term this when Calculation vibration using of dB Section predicted impact, September in of based the speed, period. order tonnes combined which dB(A). and of for 30 a resulted assessment MIQ, Chalkpit and (typically Partnership noise the the the 0%, day. based at in LANE, the traffic mph 61.3 to the on 5 For represents the 3, is gradient the per site reference Oxted range 9.5% iSh dB(A) allow to When observed contribution a Part significance carriageway of and a in upon dB(A). total 2016 Lane Design annum, increase,” noise OXTED. increasing PPV was in 15 short BNLs Road and 7 a Quarry is 0.1 respectively. the the years etc. added HD21 of closed, worst the rise dependent figures between assessment may term a 12% shod — By Manual imports application the of SURREY, September peak Traffic Minor to 2.9, from 3/11: traffic, adding after of 63.2 case gradients to gradients resulting respectively. impact be above the term with noise the which increase the the impact made project for dB(A), at comparison, BNLs upon Noise it RH8 observed the (i.e. no northern a road 200,000 a during Roads is of level 2016 BNLs level 1.4 is quarry from of apparent average threshold OQW on to CRTN in at 65.6 opening)... recorded identified (CRTN). traffic. 0%, dB(A) changes Table the the opening) of the survey and increased 0% 2016 access tonnes dB(A) traffic, 0.3 increasing the 9.5% guidance. appraisal day increase change Bridges that 3.1. to criteria mm/s, at speed traffic which as over data. 12% or is The and and 16 and the the per the In to a a a 1 is is of of to 17 2.2 the can of traffic cause to where quarry longer widely routhg busiest change express isolation Chalkpit terms opened) required Average baseline. impact history identified However, plant no up laboratory the change no in is “Moderate” the “tn be on movements often where change permitted of the Lane, of proportionate a year. often directions, single, with clear a noise is 4.2: OQW by Annual a as one-way and dB(A) HGV levels would the project dwelling. within Road, threshold which that consider both possible.” 3 a whole and the and Rb/B assessed the if outside on traffic represents a to People increase in Chalkpit construction is the baseline the their of to noise and daily appraisal. reduced traffic a on when Green change 2042 to paragraph years classified 21). when occur with the over to suggests due is at heavy 114 Guidelines travels term SURREY, AAWT changes to mitigated (e.g. apparent even quarry of (Ref further dB(A) indoors long-term, of against many is and associated would be Barrow This 3 figure damage it development be traffic the (lEA) assessment a noise that longer halved i.e. traffic for felt the as where the vibration: magnitude OXTED, consistent level increases is dB(A) permission but for In the of is its should be Friday activities short-term would nuisance that such increase traffic Quarry include of 5.0 to active figure, Quarry structural noise noise proposed occurred. the the can to to terms traffic extant noise which of in Partnership in concluded traffic in by daily flow in found the cause changes up identified terms an been circumstances However, routes, Oxted Assessment should is that development, Oxted cause of is in Monday perceptible. it 1. and dB(A) was the term Quarry has impact CHALKPIILANE, the such traffic wilt new change, advice I flow. change it caused busier perception movements a there In of a climate average of and the scenario, increases threshold site feet short increase to average the development vibrations Oxted on traffic that dB(A) HD213/1 significant AAWT low this the for HGV 3 foregoing, noise The dwettThgs the Quarry, QUARRY considered the On they 2042. of Such human following the dB(A) a fact Environmental vibration change not that and is are in 3 is of 362 of hour a the relates 3.2 of the advice is that represents until the contribution using Huristone of baseline it against the that 18 term. Oxted conditions. that this flows level the noticeable higher prevailing when the shown network. Table vibrations impact that ATOXIED the criteria impact with perceptible. be impacts, that below provides provides the apparent Traffic; are longer the day the traffic perceptible operating that The Institute considered is within been assessed Ground-borne basis within upon smallest compared considering prevailing may falls noise on it 3/11 use, 3/11 the impact noted the comparing the the has the is concern 3.15 HD21 it HGV become volumes protocol, Vibration When to Having baseline When associated dB(A) dilution traffic in based traffic on Lane, recorded impact It By When is considered acknowledged conditions. Weekday HD21 over continue term dB(A) permanent REVtEW(ROMP,I 10804/D3 2017 PERIOOtC May 8.14 8.15 JPH/1 8.12 8.13 8.10 8.11 8.9 JPH/I May PERIODIC 2017 10804/D3 REVIEW lower purposes percentage 46.21 exposure by 58 vibrat road maintenance vibration new surface. 45.26 A5.25 Furthermore, to similar distinguishable with of traffic been mm/s are walking direction 3.32 maximum unsound) type between vibration). ground. 3.30 road pre-existing buildings Groundborne superficial 3.29 appear occupants airborne plaster LAIO making above (ROMP) project. poor roads ion and carried vehicles PPVs induced than and Vibration Traffic levels Significant The Extensive during on dB Such is Airborne and

is rolling The the of usage, and may be surfaces speed For expected a typically 10 vibration perceptible anxiety cracks suspended and and relationship the of predicting AT in suitable strains this assumed percentage work, of as out vibration mm/s their vibration vibrations vibration the possibly vibrations the and people from OXTED vibration wheels therefore, corresponding can the an however, noise of (Ref research ground-borne vibration life

structure Huristone relief in occupants. are and are movement these had (Ref assessment cracking to irregularities and be adjustment of plaster to vibration 30), QUARRY, affect (Ref bothered exposure is and an is from wooden occur below between sub a caused of measured are to are be of 8, cause a often zero building. are order these a those on from the people but 32) low of more traffic, The grade unlikely a building a due at around dominant 1 buildings Vibration a of very source per road figure and no in nuisance, even floors high vibrations frequency mm/s. CHALKPIT cracks of index vibrations traffic wide level by to from the will a causing sensitive. to the cent bothered evidence point a magnitude small conditions) in the structural surface other vibration to percentage PPV exposure of minor only openings road range for 8-20 terms of of and is can Normal percentage be should historic can close to in similar in

annoyance Partnership significant percentage ground-borne causes. noise the of maybe be important LANE, should disturbance propagate. traffic. operating the Hz damage. the be (Ref be very 0.3 of has of damage curve is to necessary smaller be sites ground range but produced use transmitted buildings value to Peak such audible mm/s nuisance. heavily 30). lower of much OXTED. been assumed not that generated There it bothered. people damage of in (i.e. caused when of is domestic and be should as Particle to measured for than a during Figure It people producing found or at very vibration frequency trafficked presented building existing buildings was of SURREY, doors should by in noise quite is all considering through bothered in On would various will to produced exceptional the unlikely by not no the these For to 46.1 exposure Velocity, at appliances buildings. nuisance a average and irregularities also support evidence heavily engines on exposure (unless such passage be can lot a physical roads can be RH8 range should as the cases.” ages given a by borne by windows depend that be needed floor a occur by as air disturbance 0GW vibration or benefit largely levels. rarely trafficked rectified it circumstances. the traffic except Minor or and of closing the this level or that of can be PPV levels is in movement in when exhausts 50-100 through a in theory on structurally the interaction to employed types can mind would exposure exceed source generate of airborne the of cracking induced For (i.e. that building is activate below vertical during a doors, noise roads levels often 10% from road new that has the the 18 that Hz. the the be of of in 2 The Huristone Partnership

8.16 Giventhatthe lowestlevelat whichanyvibrationimpactis assessed isa BNLof58dB(A) and the highestpredictednoise levelon the steepest sectionof the routeis 63.5dB(A) when assessed correctlyon the average dailyflow,it is apparentthat there is limited scope forpeopleto be botheredbyairbornevibrationon ChalkpitLane. Basedon Figure A6.1and the associatedTableof DatafromHD213/11,an increaseof2.2dB(A)between 61.3 and 63.5 dB(A)wouldresultin an increase fromapproximately15% (at 61 - 62

dB(A))to 19%(at 63 — 64 dB(A))of peoplebeingbotheredverymuchor quitea lotby trafficnoise. However,based on the advicein paragraphA6.21,whenallowingforthe 10%reductionforpeoplebeingbotheredbyvibrationcomparedto noise,the percentages reduceto 5% and 9% respectively.Giventhe relativelylownumberof houses fronting ChalkpitLane!the 4% variationis notconsideredto representa significantimpactwhen comparingthe scenario where there was no activityat OxtedQuarrywiththe actual baselinecondition.

8.17 Iftakingthe peak day as the upperleveland the highestnoiselevelof 66.3based upon the steepest gradient,the increaseof 5.0 dB(A)wouldresultinan increasefrom15%(at 61—62dB(A))to 25%(at 66—67dBA),whichequates to5%and 15%respectivelywhen allowingforthe 10%correctionfactor. Effectively,even underthe worstcase scenario, the noise/ vibrationimpactswouldbotheran additional10%ofthe residentsifthe highest dailyflowof 362 HGVmovementsbecame the average weekdayflowto/fromthe site over the wholeyear, whichclearlycould not occur giventhe limitsto the quantumof materialpermittedto be importedperannum.

8.18 Whenconsideringthefactthatthereis an extantpermissionto2042and a clearhistoryof HGVuse, the prevailingvibrationclimateshould includethe quarrytrafficwithinthe baseline. Whencomparedagainstthis scenario,the proposeddevelopmentrepresents nochangetothe prevailingconditions.

CommunityEffects/Severance

8.19 Effectson the communitycan ariseas a resultof a revisedinfrastructurelayout,changes in trafficflowor both. In thiscase there are no proposedchanges to the layoutof the roadnetworkassociatedwiththe development,or indeedthe prevailingtrafficflowswhen comparedwiththe extant planningpermission. However,forcomparisonpurposesan assessment has been undertakenbetweenscenarioswherethere is no developmentat OxtedQuarryand withoperationsat the recentlevelsof activityto assess the impactof the variationintrafficflow.

8.20 Part 8 of DMRBVolume11 advises assessments on the effectson communitiesbe assessed on routeswheretrafficflowswouldincreaseordecreaseby30%.

8.21 DMRB11definesa reductionof circa30%in builtup areas as offeringslightrelieffrom

severance, risingto reductionsof 60 — 75%in ruralareas to achievethe same levelof relief. However,wherethe existingroad is passingthrougha villageor on the edge ofa builtuparea the 30%thresholdshouldbe applied.

PERIODICREVIEW(ROMP)ATOXTEDQUARRYCHALKPITLANE,OXTED,SURREY,RHB00W 19 JPH/l 10804/03 May2017 JPH/l PERIODIC May 8.28 8.27 8.26 8.25 8.24 8.23 8.22 2017 10804/03 REVIEW traffic fall on relatively even just Having vehicles the movements not Similarly, movements extreme The peak HGV recorded In single per HGV would significance The The above which component) 100% and pleasantness provides and The when of Oxted magnitude In terms Chalkpit just this approach 12 below 32 hour, (ROMP) 18 Guidelines Assessment) Institute guidance Guidelines hour flows movements if flows the increase HGV hour have adding not Quarry considered per 6% adding hour case, and of

hazards The short information at based site traffic the 1000 realistically day. HGV over are of Lane would flow recorded movement as the AT of previously is HGV 12 of the of was a the there based the threshold halved changes is higher, length the or OXTED hour the single ATO Environmental on observed volume traffic, provide a — Adding state should thresholds in based per flow, journey, daily doubling, occur closed. the

average, Huristone ‘Guidelines 2000 the busiest 18 terms are daily on on on site day of foregoing, or HGV resulting have hour per QUARRY, traffic the 7he been flow the in was the operations the pedestrian on an as road. no HGV doubled.” at on in on HGV pedestrian day of or recorded daily day. the average per route. but a average which the a example September2016. at and sections 166 Chalkpit MEA volumes considered, Chalkpit average the result significant to for Assessment which movements in movements day proportions it To Manual CHALKPIT whilst HGV journey 7.2% movements. result Moderate would a the suggests a the cease, Amenity reduced to flows of daily However, daily pedestrian moderate of Lane amenity of Lane. on hourly Environmental a flows of there west in Oxted need route for what

the ambience Partnership impact. Barrow together significant development the fall flow the LANE, levels become over per of (now and Environmental impact recorded would and local If that significantly traffic to 12 which up Quarry. traffic would may of there taking impact 18 occur the amenity Fear Green hour to east 114 Institute are OXTED, For a with road be it associated flows hour 63 be 19.1% fear already flows 18 is be tentative includes identified Assessment movements the and example, more in at flow via when clearly traffic considered exposure The could hour Road, where network and exceptional is day. Oxted SURREY, below over peak of involved Barrow Intimidation. of observed affected Assessment than carried additional Environmental the intimidation. period the results traffic be a the threshold with to an the daily By 1000 Quarry threshold based site a daily where be to anticipated represents Green 18 peak of traffic halving are P1-18 moderate, Oxted comparing one to noise it traffic 600 activity was in circumstances in Road vehicles hour is flow a traffic sufficiently a on OQW to hour September HGV In established changes (MEA) moderate — total flow for operational, Road Quarry. and at of the flows, the assessing 1200 day and Management Traffic” of judging which flow an HGV attracted would (or of along per air great statement observed 362 the 22.7% and baseline of vehicles just increase its speeds quality, of low day of traffic level, 1983. flows flows HGV for 2016 1993 total lorry be 376 that this and 146 20 this the do the to of at to a a The Huristone Partnership

8.29 Dust and dirtcan also be a source of nuisance,particularlywhere quarryingand the transportof quarriedmaterialstakes place. The guidanceconfirms that the impactof dustand dirtwilldepend to a large extent,uponthe managementpracticesundertakenon site, e.g. washing-downwheelsand sheeting”. Theoperatorcurrentlyseeks to minimise adverseimpactsofdustand dirtusing:

• automaticwheelwashingfacilities; • handwashingofvehicleunder-bodywithpower-wash • dampingdownofaccess andhaulroadsplusotherhardstandingareas; • use ofa roadsweeper;and • sheetingofvehicles.

8.30 Havingconsideredthe foregoing,itis apparentthatthe proposeddevelopmentwouldnot have a significantdetrimentalimpacton the localroadnetworkintermsof environmental matters.

9 CUMULATIVEIMPACT

9.1 SurreyCountyCouncil’sScopingOpinionrequiredthecumulativeimpactofOxtedQuarry to be consideredinthe contextof programmed/commilleddevelopmentsinthe area. To confirmwhatdevelopmentsshouldbe included,the HighwayAuthoritywas consultedon 2 May2012. Theresponse,receivedon 3d May2012identifiedOxtedSand Pit,which was alsoidentifiedinthe ScopingOpinion,and Palmer’sWoodOilfield.

OxtedSand Pit

9.2 The inclusionof Oxted Sand Pit derivedfromcommentsmade withinthe Inspector’s Reporton the Examinationintothe SurreyMineralsPlanPrimaryAggregatesDPDofMay 2011,whichspecificallyhighlightedthe potentialcumulativeimpactand stated:“Aproject transportassessment at applicationstage wouldbe requiredto take account of the total volume of trafficmovements connected with the preferred area and the restoration operationson the existingsandpitas wellas othertrafficonBarrowGreen Road.”

9.3 In March2017, SurreyCountyCouncilPlanning& RegulatoryCommitteeresolvedto grant planningpermission(subjectto a S106Agreement)forthe applicationMINERALS TA11/1075,whichprovidesfor the infillingof the site withinert waste for restoration purposessubjectto 39 planningconditions.Asconfirmedinthe TransportStatementof July 2011, which accompanies and forms part of the EnvironmentalStatement accompanyingthe planningapplication,“Thesite has an extantpermissionpermitting110 movementsper dat. Thislimithas been acceptedbySurreyCountyCouncilandcarried throughto thesuggestedplanningconditions,witha reductionto60 perdayon Saturdays (at NO.10of the 22 March 2017 Planning & RegulatoryCommitteeReport). The developmentwouldalso be subject to an 8 year time limitfollowingthe date of the permissionbeinggranted(atcondition3).

9.4 As part of the proposedOxtedSand Pit development,the existingaccess arrangement wouldbe revisedundera S278Agreementto preventHGVsturningrightinto,or leftout

PERIODICREVIEW(ROMP)ATOXTEDQUARRY,CHALKPITLANE,OXTED,SURREY,RHB00W 21 JPH/110804/D3 May2017 May JPH/110804/D3 PERIODIC 9.9 9.8 9.7 9.6 9.5 2017 REVIEW northwards export locked. leading additional compound cumulative Streele the Committee Under Regulatory northeast However, Palmers the cumulative case, conditions, proposed conditions Palmer’s As conjunction considered impacts improvements in the the when The ensure implement approach routing section of In roundabout. both the addition Rooks determination sandpit two a (ROMP) baseline Oxted Surrey result of site the Court HGVs directions to sites agreement of on Wood oil The Wood The the development from vehicle of Nest access, a impact from advises Committee and highway Barrow impact to thereby would and heading with ocalised to AT the tarmac Quarry at of that Complex. site County traffic travelling the proposed This “The these Oilfield the OXTED that wellsile the its the S106 Qilfield Barrow environmental of movements also Rooks be of serving along Huristone which associated west Green ‘Vehicles site resolution accepting time. flows is the capacity, arrangement activities landfill the access was suitable Highways, widening measures, Council is dated has agreement, also QUARRY is in staff only. ROMP along proposed The the primarily development Green Nest is operational, acceptable, opposite within The Oxted Road an located operation proposed western road, final vehicle 16 accessing to at safety Barrow There with over may access the compound. improvements to for on Oxted accommodate Road February the Traffic CHALKPIT the between impact part accessed Sand grant would restoration Oxted part cumulative the directions Oxted approximately have and Surrey movements”. or is Oxted section developer Green would of and to or is Quarry at to traffic a bends of or Pit. above and the planning Barrow direct may Quarry. only Partnership concentrate refused Palmers of 2011 reinforce Sand which exiting therefore the LANE, Sand County from access The therefore Road. related the of can Access, of identified The and be used between impact the junction site the for the Barrow Pit of Green unmade is the made pass Pit from OXTED, planning 350m proposed concluded free permission application Wood Officer’s Oxted tanker access initially should site road the by Council considered environmental A22, Transport is the not movement Palmers paragraph each within site off Road acceptable by Green the from requirement has acceptable. Qilfield, SURREY access to Sand movements result 30 of HGV not shared permission. and staff site other. the report must that the a Sand the the approximately September TA1O/0060 subject be Road, barrier Statement Wood south the the Pit activity in access Barrow A Transport and subject track of would considered 126 conditions. with be subject RH8 to 22 any cumulative Pit A25 HGV is for is before Were of Oilfield the The to Godstone satisfied generated also to of occupiers material OQW development As Green not kept M25 and along all to 2025. roundabout, considered traffic the the were the Planning to applicant Statement the proposing a deliveries 190m that involve going Junction do the deliverable gated relevant Coney suggested result, report proposed impact Lane/A25 the travelling recorded that so adverse Bypass not by A25 of to uphill from short and and any the Hill has 22 the the the the the the for to 6. to of in to to to A The Huristone Partnership

9,10 Paragraph134of the reportto Committeeidentifiesconcernsraisedby an objector:“In particularhe refers to additionaltrafficassociated withthe GodstoneGolfClub,the vehiclemovementsassociatedwiththe fillingat OxtedChalkpitand vehiclesassociated withOxtedSandpit”.

9.11 Paragraph136ofthe reportto Committeeadvises: Hadthe oilfieldsite been restoredin 2004there wouldclearlynot be any vehiclemovementsassociatedwiththe oilfield,but the HighwayAuthorityhas pointed out that as Palmers Wood Oilfieldis currently operational,any trafficassessment ofdevelopmentsrequiringplanningpermissionin the area shouldtake into account the existingtrafficconditionson the highwaynetwork, whichwouldincludethe trafficassociatedwithoilextraction. Thetotaltrafficgeneration of the site is currentlynot significantand it willnot be increasedby the extensionof the productionperiod”.

9.12 Paragraph 137 continues:“HGVsaccessing OxtedChalkpittravel up BarrowGreen Road and althoughnot altHGVsleavingthe chalkpituse the same route,a worstcase scenario accountcan be taken of all ChalkpitHGVsexitingvia BarrowGreen Road. Whilstthe ConeyHillcompoundis accessed fromBarrowGreenRoad,a memberofstaff in a LGVvisitsthe compoundonce a day and the remainderof the timethe access is gatedandlocked”

9.13 Itis apparentfromthe precedingparagraph,that inassessingthe impactofthe proposed developmentat PalmersWoodCilfield,the Councilhas assessed the cumulativeimpact on the assumptionthat all of the traffictravellingto/fromOxtedQuarry(the Chalkpit), does so viaBarrowGreenRoad,past the access to the ConeyHillCompound.As has been describedpreviously,OxtedQuarryoperatesa one-waysystembyagreementwith Surrey CountyCouncil,whicheffectivelyhalves the volumeof Oxted Quarrytraffic travellingalongthe westemsectionof BarrowGreenRoadand reducesthe potentialfor HGVstravellinginoppositedirectionsto meetalongtheroute.

9.14 Atparagraph138ofthe reportto Committee,thecumulativeimpactofwithOxtedSandpit is considered:“Anothermineralworkingin the vicinityis OxtedSandpitwhichhas been workedfor sand but has yet to be filled, Currentlythe site is closed but a planning applicationhas recentlybeen madetoextendthetimeforinfillingandrestorationofOxted Sandpit. Whilstthe applicationwas deemedinvalidand was returnedto the applicant,it is understoodthatitis the applicant’sintentionto resubmitin thenear future. Theextant planningpermissionat OxtedSandpitallowsfor110HGVmovementsper dayMondayto Fridayand 60 on a Saturday. OxtedSandpithas an access ontoBarrowGreenRoad andthereforethetrafficsituationinrelationtoanyvehiclemovementsassociatedwiththe Oilfieldis the same as discussed in the paragraph above for Oxted Chalkpit. Nevertheless,whereas the Chalkpitwouldstill be operationalwhen Coney Hillis decommissionedand restored,based on the amountof fillrequiredand the timescales involved,thefillingof OxtedSandpitwouldhave ceased.”

9.15 The reportto Committeeconfirmsthat “a detailedprogrammeof decommissioningand restorationworkshas notbeenpreparedas itcouldbe another13years beforethistakes place. However,the mainactivitiesassociatedwiththe decommissioningandrestoration ofproposalprovidessome idea of the anticipatedlevelof vehiclemovements”.A table

PERIODICREVIEW(ROMP)ATOXTEDQUARRY,CHALKPITLANE,OXTED,SURREY,RH800W 23 JPH/I10804/D3 May2017 JPH/1 May PERIODIC 9.20 9.19 9,18 9.17 9.16 2017 10804/D3 REVIEW the Quarry case It thereby sites restoration to development Palmers It impact, Having transportation information When period. Oxted This within Taking Barrow equates wDrking movements. period within place and importation period. 1,600m3 The has is Oxted determination (ROMP) the therefore there variation due Highway confirmed over concluding a the Sand and it the accepting considered Green the two importation days to Quarry is

In The Wood of to would report is estimated 2 an other terms worst of AT the topsoil provided week weeks Highway Pit, set yet is impact (01:00 trees average concluded Road OXTED Authority timing and insignificant that development. to be against of to developments which on of the

case Huristone period, Committee the the and be would no and of deemed there the transport in and — that cumulative plant QUARRY, of has Authority cumulative determined, of ROMP May scenario 18:00 foregoing, revealed attract plants Coney a has has the there 4 that the would attract baseline HGV and concluded and 2011 the Sand no Monday total assessed matters, application. indicates 5 would the would specified Hill CHALKPIT well equipment objection proposal HGVs/10 Given not whereby impact has a movements impact during 10 it number Pit potential access range it assuming be within is attract is be HGVs!20 recently to restoration, paragraph a clear apparent that the with that

the Partnership an by with the Friday combined acceptable, to all of movements. LANE. the of from involved restoration average Surrey 3 the cumulative Oxted development 35 preparation the of the that Oxted per movements a HGVs/6 range considered movements proposal. worst the and movements Barrow OXTED, day that application 157 either application should County Quarry cumulative Quarry. identified in of of 07:00 subject case of (2 movements in the would 4 day In the Green impact the in!2 cars/vans SURREY, of terms it equates addition, restoration proposal to Council — in the be to the over permission report (63 to out) take 2018, 13:00 for terms HGV day would approved, impact conditions. Road! Transport of associated Palmers — over a the RHS place variation over to during to per should potential 28) or activities on 2 of and 36 Committee activity have the between refused, week Oxted day a QQW traffic Saturday). a over will over spread 2 3 based the relative Wood Statement importation not week resulting week observed be with cumulative a period; the would aft took a restoration Sand influence granted, one in all ractions minimal over on period. survey states: oilfield period; Oxted to which three place This year take 24 the in the the Pit for on 11 of 8 1 in to 25 not the of free take from HGV itself level, miles miles lower every Great driver good, layout site annum annum around agreed Barrow against in roads are reached average involved planning have accident, recorded the that 362 the very per per HGV Despite of an of billion and until should at at that activity of local been it prediction with system as achieved the extant OQW per Quarry days on geometric a limit level miles vehicles casualties: 2016 flow HGV 2,571,319.6 “Vehicles compared a also its to day access in was the generally severity RHB limit rates, the of However, their road HGV is Oxted daily has anticipated indicate one-way every site working highest when and at associated every setting with accidents be unacceptable. when speed equates terms the peak of the 275 RAS20001 recorded record collision SURREY ensure type 67,694 not in operations 388 HGV access. at and on collision to accident the of specified Reported a in that be network conclusion flow which activities result 20mph HGV occurred at safety the the a a would HGV the associated now between OXTED, intrinsically HGV vehicle based of This daily to 1 as the drivers would 5CC, for day) confirms by are involved historic involving constrained to follow highway Lane by LANE, resumption is per assumption observe to observed arise collision collision site miles), the are 2016 there mornings) between Partnership rates highest to the local network, on the requiring the reference site; guidance. that that collision standards 0.68 equates injury the at would Chalkpit / on HGVs network (he upon second circumstances the road CHALKPIT suggested and rules of a request Saturday This collision based injury on movements collision. than a that September road conflict, The 1 as 1.1km day based local site on revealed an involvement Based of personal desirable that calculated leaving and for assuming length be HGV operations per the for local QUARRY, has has worse is and 2015” 2042, impacts thresholds network. reported residents. years. it the year. on 2015’ impact the no the — in working (362 9 Lane, before Huristone modem reported years Council the is CONDITIONS the day road local potential OXTED that that in of calculated every last & 38 site 2005 report currently to mud potentially risk (approximately AT of per the account accidents the movements earliest. undertaken expires regular single or the fault of the County recognised Chalkpit short constraints a of signify on The 56 day in at the into at unacceptable Road annual Britain, could on assessing at of not level therefore chalk operator review falls not only recognised to site Surrey reported terms is is It level 2054 working permission approximately occur Great This In Britain (assuming movements by Green there It travelled travelled. in travelled. Taking and from consideration MITIGATION The nationally activity the was The led does apparent figure. when with REVIEW(ROMP/ 10804/D3 2017 10.7 10.6 10.5 May PERIODIC 10.3 10.4 10.1 JPH/1 10.2 10 May JPH/1108o4/D3 PERIODIC 10.14 10.13 10.12 10.11 10.10 10.9 10.8 2017 REVIEW(ROMP) waiting the recommended planning sensible has It it Whilst impact transporting conditions be used associated SCC It to operated to that network, In is have been of imperfections In reduction increases the assist The beneficial. In permitted HGV is was is be assist an noise terms terms terms necessary restricted taken likely the most understood site and a demonstrated, does important a collision noted it in would to result may operator significant generated application in response it reducing of The for they has that of use of in steps life with do fundamental would the with HD213/1 vibration, not a AT noise that traffic many be view planning of be of in different not a some the to that would speedy every the OXTED the part to chalk the activities wheel the identical. propose that the impose appear reports restrict the weighbridge to level.” this remedy years Huristone noise, by to speed impact Site case to road drivers 1 the in the mirror be there potential airborne 222 traffic. extraction/export. advises regularise the repair type be conditions, QUARRY, and preventing Rules unrestricted, in left. that impact and that any surface a at the Travelling included to the of problem. this years. the on opposite limit of would lorry the had of the the impose working It its the defects material. voluntarily speed “The for resulting airborne sources by is the site. noise on ongoing on the CHALKPITLANE, historically washing existing therefore vehicle mirror are detritus installing also traffic as it carriageway As noise effect the at relocated the there the is restriction to part any It rights prediction 20 a have are was same in In important the site is vibration. induced use main Given and imposed conditions Partnership result, levels of to facilities mph of queuing terms is limit recommended understood a closely in Highway provided the been be access the made no has weighbridge a weighbridge. types cause. respect (32 deposited that in reduction speed on advised associated logical ROMP of 1 process. vibration. not OXTED, order by occasions to and collision use km/hr) back the linked In the are the had of the led to Authority The ensure terms of of or highway vehicle of that a process. adequate. to assist same number to been operator. to in vehicles the that on SURREY, defensible in sealed it further therefore to monitoring minimise Above Chalkpit unsatisfactory with the when Should could It the speed traffic the site. of when the that is damaged the types at simply Site network, ground Oxted therefore highway. Council into of surface the mirror exiting on neighbouring 40 also As However, additional RH8 noise will that adverse minimises vehicles Lane. vehicle reason of Rules noise of the earliest km/hr, Oxted because Quarry normally vehicle surface OQW occur be be by borne their the may site, levels, access impacts recommended the level The replaced. a is why impacts. movements site, this have Quarry falling opportunity noise or particularly which respective the during case, require would would dwelling, vibration, condition operator they is cause it is revised As road due on impact would one been likely tree. level is it has 26 are has the not be the to is of a a to a The Huristone Partnership

1015 In order to maintainthis pro-activemanagement,considerationcould be given to imposingan additionalplanningconditionrequiringthe Site Rules to be maintainedin perpetuityfor the lifeof the development,subject to periodicreviewin response to mattersarisingand bestpracticeprocedures.

11 RESIDENTS’CONCERNS

11.1 Thereis a historyofconcernsbeingexpressedbyresidentsregarding(heuse ofChalkpit Lane by HGVtraffictravellingto/fromOxted Quarry. An OfficerReport to Local Committee(Tandridge)dated 7 May2008was submittedby 5CC, whichreferredto a petitionof425signatures.

11.2 Havingconsideredvariousoptionsand consultedwiththe Policeregardingexistinguse and potenhalalternatives,thereportconcludedat paragraph10.1:

“Whilstit is recognised that the problems of HGVtrafficare unacceptableto local residents,the CountyCouncil,DistrictCounciland SurreyPoliceare unableto remove theproblem.Ameliorationmeasures are possiblebutwillnotreducethenumberofHGVs usinglheroads. OxtedQuarry’shaulroadproposalseems favourableprovidedthe traffic is notableto use Woldinghamlocalroadsas an alternative.”

11.3 Thehaulroadproposalreferredto was a schemeto deliveran alternativeaccess to The Ridge,whichwoulddivertQuarrytrafficawayfromChalkpitLaneand itsacceptabilitywas subjectto an assessmentofthe impactassociatedwiththe diversion.

11.4 Paragraph10.3ofthe reportstates: “Ifthe HGVtrafficon Oxtedroads werenot removed, it wouldbe appropriateto give furtherconsiderationto measures that couldameliorate some of the effects.Feasibilitystudies and publicconsultationwouldbe desirableto determinethemostappropriatemeasures. TheLocalCommitteecouldconsiderproviding fundsforthisworkat a futuremeeting.”

11.5 SCCsubsequentlyinstructedTPS “toinvestigateand reporton possiblesolutionsforthe problemsassociated withthe Heavy Goods Vehicle(HGV)movementsto and fromthe Oxted ChalkQuarry’;as confirmedin the ExecutiveSummaryof the “HeavyGoods Vehicle(HGV)RoutesinOxtedInvestigationReporfof21August2008.

11.6 TheTPS reportrefersto the 425 signaturepetitionand the SCC Reportot 7 May2008. Atsection1.2is alsoconfirms:tn May2008,a secondpetitionwithover1,200signatures from residents of Chelsham & Farteigh, Godstone. Limpsfield, Tatsfield, Titsey, Warlingham,Whyteleafeand Woldinghamrequestingmeasures to preventHGVtraffic affectingtheircommunitieswaspresentedtothe TandridgeLocalCommittee.

11.7 These are the communitiesthat couldhave been affectedhad the haul routeproposal been progressed.

PERIODICREVIEW(ROMP)ATOXTEDQUARRY,CHALKPITLANE,QXTEO,SURREY.RHBOQW 27 JPH/110804/03 May2017 JPH/1 May PERIODIC 11.16 11.15 11.14 11.13 11.12 11.11 11.10 11.9 11.8 2017 108 04/D3 REVIEW Another Chalkpit to identified converse vehicle smaller assist levels At Section whether speed the compared involved Section that Section by time Quarry Section location. It width at 4.lm 3.1.1 It figure considered. Section basis In highlights also restrict Section about the Section restriction (ROMP) the is of of from advises: in to and operator. over movements refers and possible vehicles; 4.2 3.1.1.2 these Lane infill option 2.2 3.1.1.8 the HGVs. 3.1.1.7 as mitigating

a The 5.3m. argument number imports to 3.1.1.9 traffic April I 2.1 a also a AT of road, of the previously other in It itself, constraint to year are at the the is OX details of ‘Chalkpit was 5 The 2007 considered presence by a a specifically levels, although the gradient. noted to the the the the TED residential range

of Huristone report residents’ report carrying is or HGV However, contracts It road widening gradient that railway to residents’ HGVs report report reducing also traffic QUARRY, achieved. that with the March of Lane traffic, highlights considers putting of is it HGVs 60 highlighted road smaller highway confirms TPS, flows an is sinuous the considers the narrow using survey bridge, where the and — the is 2008, recognised unknown concerns the together 80 CHALKPIT layout, railway traffic narrow a appear availability appointed on the existing limit trips Residents loads impact Chalkpit measures roads which larger Chalkpit that the safety with bendmess.” the flows on the HGV to bridge

with cost Partnership with to or existing to ..the variation a that within LANE, and the junction vehicles of reports access transport those currently by and of hairpin Lane associated the to the Lane, Concerns traffic, HGV that number from land this 5CC at key overcome, Tandridge confirmed OXTED. road absence of trees which 60 could and is would to in traffic. with which are the concerns the radius considered the navigate the implement not loads of It width site and used Author regarding a only The with same SURREY, loads states: potentially level were result further of considered and of One on that foliage.’ per Ridge, varying one the traffic in with this some quantity of a would of Oxted.” observed order the in day no busy option the “It the permitted direction imports option HGV Chalkpit RH8 section a management the flows recorded be can improvements from 20m, greater travelling report. force to day, It OQW very of width activity. was implemented reach does independently. was material. be as on in approximately Lane and as of the activity high spite the an number restriction, a concluded travel confirmed accidents widening not the operator to quadedy is average are Section use at Oxted of when steep daily state was were The at that 28 the the of of to a in to of of as an be 29 the that was was The their third near Lane Lane Short along to in it to bridge, access of confirm calming result such with widened network. ability the residents quantified over residential report the creation 2008. the bridge be need feature its Term, at no in terms Chalkpit Chalkpit the from the would traffic the signalisation Lane, or options QQW in of however, of resthctions access Lane highway considered connecting meet Long railway would The routes. along between suggested, report, RI-18 within Calming did, £25,000 feature petition against the the It route Chalkpit that wider when of network the northern require In parking at majority widening drivers was the implement north of evaluated Chalkpit M25. in Traffic of the haul calming undertaken, the Policy cost diversion high the the SURREY, calming road the A desirable. and a that issues within would on Lane the recognised terms should Road. of signals that was volumes. not access; raised of In from has traffic and proposed this local traffic was beyond affected or OXTED, was imposibon south it install estimated site traffic and Green the The to conflict the impacts potential option Chalkpit monitored which suggested an the mentioned the Option. suggested. for of and nor LANE, Lane congestion be the to objections on located However, traffic acceptable with Lane. was access safety

many Partnership was Barrow was site existing potentially recommended it were Way; was be measures, of 1200 also as England, cumulalive future 140m the the the flow; the potential and as area. was bridge Preferred capacity is have or Chalkpit at the CHALKPIT it measures directing Chalkpit network. Term, the the would exist. the terms 2008, re-evaluated. the along traffic in calming considered. Gordon’s bridge widen congestion in in bridge using be widening Highways railway existing along options and anticipated to remain, ease for reduce consider and was details improvements of of QUARRY. houses Medium considered, previous or traffic routes approximately to the to Motorway than 4 Ridge restrictions consider railway HGVs no flows movement north railway the the were these improvements M25 level of also or

the Huristone would £100,000 issues report of access only on In need overcome, The not the order OXTED the to other of potential the the approval that existing Way, traffic in to the to installed were arched of AT site of to did also and of access bridge that the and where cost comparable Should Way. systems number the the

However, HGV The Lane route link 6.1 recommended areas the of Ridge south restriction suggestions accesses land in would report signalisation the noted Gordon’s whilst railway haul the The direct is but Having Neither reduced assessment accommodate some the It to context that between recommended subsequently The between and dwellings, Ridge. Chalkpit Section Term the One-way success. party Gordon’s They living considered estimated to The direct A REVIEW(ROMP) 10804/D3 2017 11.23 11.24 May 11.22 PERIODIC JPH’I 11.21 11.20 11.18 11.19 11.17 May JPH/I PERIODIC 11.30 11.29 11.28 11 11.26 11.25 .27 2017 10804/03 REVIEW two rather on legitimately have As it proposed demonstrably (181 impacts development conclusions permitled also highest average over Notwithstanding which that in restrict Despite the hierarchy the network average £10,000 Goods 2008109 the recommended It submitted A design be “The Having is is daily further a infill scenarios our significant impact apparent (ROMP) report future,” the the result, a little in than is estimated specified Vehicle opinion activities flows. level traffic, this, assessed activity. can disputed in of assessment annual

1 and The on practical Officer to imports budget Local by 56 181 have travel terms fill should of AT justify demonstrably the the of on in The that are SCC, HGV peak in the material. accommodate based that (HGV) that daily OXTED the out) terms average period this at quantum Highway real not cost Report along on the SCC almost of Transport the to traffic report

SCC Huristone benefit the the allocated movements imposing which local the daily the and terms suggestion the highway same. had been could on capacity problems allocation of QUARRY. site. of has of Chalkpit measures consider basis As associated to the road nine site. of hourly also Authority time, only HGV of these referred in accommodate the considered given Local subsequently 114 previously be HGV SCC real findings a that Plan years that network. confirmed capacity by considered of restriction The including technical per flows, in activity lustified Lane movements CHALKPIT of by measures a terms the the Committee sought traffic Oxted. the to be scale the maximum is day resources later, review SCC, with budget low the route, of seeking progressed on original this stated, sufficiently recorded with as or this associated Local the TPS the cumulative the

on that Partnership any to the based of and revised this a the safety. LANE, is of justify it a exceeds infill safety review flow lawful activities activity per measures (Tandridge) given daily for is to on the study. ROMP maximum not both same in updated environmental Committee our impose traffic upon day at a terms OXTED, of subject ils TPS surprising, the investigation important limit cost implications activities scenarios day the with a conclusion Notwithstanding up flows, number without TS The proposed based available figure suggested at would of site the study proposed of to / provided report conditions daily transporting considered Oxted benefit SURREY, dated Summary HGV to 56 practical which between fact at of upon in the of within be flow as resulting HGV had leads impact the specifically that 362 flows of restrictions the 5th Quarry, budgets. unnecessary June basis. availability they work that in conditions remain on of the the site. cost on RH8 September same movements congestion highway the movements technical of to all 150 Chalkpit 2008 this, chalk should peaks the are increased the the of the activity in QQW 2008 in Having overall on both below movements. operator vehicles carrying as the It and considers report excess from unacceptable network same to of on and be is impact, the Lane in no and terms, an at funding 2311 from proposed 2008 would the published reviewed imposed transport therefore the per terms per troughs level the advised limit overall annual would Heavy could of chalk which within basis site, day, day has and the 30 site was the the the the not of is of in it a is is of of be no be 31 the the it the the this the has and and time HGV It be wear Lane such more limits is to traffic ahead arrive, by natural on without this, also vehicles the who terms a available technical concerns to outbound may duplicates result, before between Rules same associated of average have in travel there movements a weighbridge the for school any such the unacceptable may vehicle to Chalkpit opinion. not the site as Site As undertaken, there of the OQW appeared queuing limit demonstrate on carriageway be which alleviate for controlled creates at of HGV congestion, the impact the continue annual operator, extraordinary to the distance to already weighbhdge by RHB the of HGVs can drivers site installed cross daily the for it until the Whilst the via the review drivers would occur increased HGVs to may the a lead justified periods the order restrictions overcomes surveys to and clear or at the other condition the of confirmed loads/200 drivers been In professional has be event upon a operationally, delay organisation. be en-route by route. SURREY. this turn hour could impose minimise prevent 100 Such has not this or damage encourage the 5CC, our 2008 materials, leaving increased not HGV for in queue to the to arrived of washed in recompense weighbridge whether this by condition in further peak burden Lane. may has for be impose infill imposition OXTED. which delayed they May a would use. limit it the for taken HGVs order could historically. of to which seeks the causing seek 1980, be of at the 7th individual in as revisions, known already result, must cap which to demonstrated accommodate 012 time weighbridge provided are of a Act a should 16:00), Motorway. Chalkpit not the may capacity HGVs held a as to additional upon

— Partnership during have is HGV site, restriction As of The Quarry, occurred safety, with operator be introducing It unnecessary importing two an M25 delay HGV5 powers Authority particular report evidence the requirement joined reasonable the that surveys has insist 15:00 design a day each the the can and likelihood site. a CHALKPITLANE. result operationally, difficult Highways vehicles the the the or addition, has into the to Oxted and Lane. a However, per 5CC highway and as the In the be periods. with the on traffic SCC restrictions HGVs HGV with fair imposes within potential that As of hours, of the queuing upon considered site. addition, Historically, impose the undesirable. also the are perception, already QUARRY. 09:00 leaving 59 and junction Chalkpit restrictions these to relocated by leaving be which — the HGV5. should arrivals, this terms Lane, second impose attributable some regarding driving which in occurring of local based movements use engaging

avoid is Huristone six associated levels would to accommodated perception been the necessary, this, HGVs OXTED in of access that to would Section within It similar during to powers therefore highway. before (08:00 their be SCC Authority leaving restrict and seeking as HGV AT result the has the is confirmed Chalkpit the Quarry traffic to by a seeks day held order terms which under upon from space As to

also The space could public frequently As in in times. upon between the and exisng be weighed is pro-active enforcement, movements also convoy; unnecessary Highway Oxted tear the occurred considered cleared understood day, that a loads/100 be is has not and been has these 5CC based verges. The HGVs. effective, as operate their It break expressed with suitable benefit weighbridge and and to as imposed highway, queuing per basis impractical cut-off obstructing HGV 50 cumulative counter-productive quickly Notwithstanding during operator 5CC could REVIEW(ROMP,I 11.35 PERIODIC 11.34 JPH/110804/D3 May2017 11.33 11.31 11.32 May JPH/1 PERIODIC 11.41 11.40 11 11.38 11.37 11.36 .39 2017 1 0804/D3 REVIEW to this the a the would account operator. The Order formal operator, request, roads, site Taking going Oxted with between The accommodated comparable during above, installed data conflict Lane. The historically Chalkpit the SCC We regular but In the traffic undertaken HGVs vehicle be response Traffic M25 section highway. business. final must has also (ROMP) Hamfield third second effective, provided has fastest. to be 20 associated Quarry in the the the since This with the use bridge not impose they request Hamfield actuated Lane on understand The prepared who request sign mph consideration suggested Regulation third occurring However, works last of use for AT of pedestrians with Chalkpit had suggestion was to Close, The then. the will The will by it up and limit the be at OXTED and at the of and nine would a was cause those have 5CC. least was highway suggested to, sign. the with be Close first Chalkpit 20 take to fourth Huristone observed route Barrow would increased the fourth on based that contribute years additional requires the Order the 5CC Lane prevented mph bridge, for is be 5 QUARRY, the not the to the historically Quarry. of is and Given along years the by request provision 5CC operator the necessary reinforce undertake request is speed the Green been site, Lane residents. for on has route, or for necessary HGVs provision Barrow likely in to it provision HGV import the this thereabouts. installed provision vehicles beyond a appears the £5000 improvements the as confirmed considered be by from CHALKPIT 20 Due was limit. it Road. Council’s to of together, travelling section daily/hourly occurring cannot the far cyclists, appears drivers mph report travelling Green to increase traffic any levels to consideration visiting of towards As routine action. as provide existing of This kerbs that coming the of a speed Partnership It extraordinary a practically of pavement a prepared LANE, implement traffic adopt signals Road. that is together belief vehicle to provision the allowed that length to must result, on Chalkpit along apparent the works the it quickly, Given be the a HGV (from Notwithstanding Site limit Site from would no provision the 3 justified lights OXTED, a that be site. potential costs way where between of activated maximum the Rule should on maintenance Rules, such with for volumes by route, possible (footway) done the the by Lane, Oxted a this the like they control that Chalkpit maintenance at northern the 20 Should SCC the of and its daily/hourly Chalkpit, SURREY. Chalkpit for as by is the necessary by advertising the for mph which and drivers there Environment operator gradient, as STOP where should Quarry gulley the capital electronic would are the without historically. speed railway conflict between between operator confirmed this, speed Lane which HGVs part operator Council. is comparable each or Lane vehicles RHB lines, opposite cleaning not no be expenditure until be of to the is of the repairs and/or HGV adversely Traffic bridge to and restriction have travelling driver not evidence supported speed the date, the OQW accord 20 the narrows to reported occur. and imposition signalisation 2012 Agency is by justified. implementing implement As mph The northern route Scout volumes appear not etc. the provision been the on despite visiting Regulaon have taking with sign described and justified. with operator on In affecting Chalkpit north junction collision by of at to/from in permit, to Hut by safely order those to to other least local HGV 2003 SCC been of and into this 32 the the the are the be be on on of of of a is of in in of by be on on be for 33 the the and and one take time each traffic 2014) out sharp and Plans, in convoy that also relevant only terms transport travelling proposed set in the effectively impacts hourly in a accordance together cleared travelling is should to March the supported Travel depending of in would between cost requirement not inter-green 06 should major travelling OQW be HGVs to was It up and apparent on development impact Assessments travelling that the is inappropriate recorded for lines had RHB released cumulative it impacts refusal, driver taken extending decisions the should and a (revised nothing prevent people: states: for stop then HGVs Quarry. significant need in which reference that highest to alt and highway principles network been of in that counter-productive the residual SURREY, Development light network, the for transport considered By for “Transport which possibly the result be Oxted reason activities is the have movement red Guidance the seeks Plans on a result 32, to test a of head-on, apparent of transport OXTED, be likelihood could between would reduce on residual is impact. where achieved modes section, assumption based would it the so the “Overarching breach. ongoing policy to provision the may Practice access be cyclist LANE, time approaches; back development. do the amounts to paragraph a the capacity the This specifically this even severe the to Partnership can within site, at the of on a Assessment. grounds the which held transport suggestion national and increase in whether site and SCC Planning be of the previously, within result, stage. last the along CHALKPIT impact, Failure Statements” Framework”. clearance a the speed also of significant threshold the encounter result safety of Lane to 005 transport As in this “severe’ would Transport to Framework site. form undertaken not and establish earlier the on acceptability impacts Policy detailed high would be sustainable or that to be the levels highway, they QUARRY accesses. only to the considering a location access adequate generate the for severe.” increased approach. Policy would Chalkpit as would operator. the can is the capacity. used at reiterated TED paragraph are of refused access that Huristone from and likely of Planning the to/from severe each When OX be assessing or in and thresholds significant Lane, suitable provide site by within Statement are been considered direction, queues on volume AT Planning can assessing north Assessments impact flows is to whether: the reach the section and when probably nature sections it has light. opportunities of The safety of National at the works advises traffic which not phase Chalkpit to the traffic development improvements the infrastructure; prevented safe limit test (ROMP) the opposite developments National supported severe Transport terms green • • • All Transport Environmental higher daily with Statements development Similarly, would a account A In together, This which necessary along a Signals further the controlled bend not green direction, the highway southern during REVIEW 10804/03 2017 11.46 11.45 11.44 11.42 11.43 PERIODIC JPH/1 May JPH/110804/03 PERIODIC

May

12.3

12.5

12,4

12.3

12.2

12

12.1

11.48 11.47 2017

REVIEW

extends

submission,

conservation

Partnership The

Southern

site to

accordance

The

and Oxted

reference departing

Environment 2011, whereby

Under The

departing

is

north

roads Oxted

SUMMARY

movements

average and

peak

highway continuation

HGV emerging site

In which

existing

Having

reinstate

located

the would

(ROMP)

increase

existing

site

site

national

and

figure movements

of

Quarry

known

the

Quarry

event

would

an

to

considered

is

network

planning

of

is The

the

subject

all

Gravel

TA traffic

to

approximately

21

technologies

Town

be

Environmental

the

accessed

Limited

as with

AT

also

of

(100

100

the

habitats.

of

traffic

Act

5CC

93/0765

guidance,

crop be

February

planning

as

northern

produces

consists

restored

indicated

362

extraction

OXTED the

leaves

south

the

retained

Chalkpit

and

HGV

used

Limited, in/100

that

1995 to

associated

considers

conditions

yield

Huristone

operations

to

movements

approaching

review

approved

the

Country

via would

relating

review

of

of

to

movements

QUARRY. 2042.

Periodic

site

permission

for

or

to

out

chalk

in

2km

Notwithstanding

as

foregoing,

the

the 27 as

Lane

Chalkpit

area

the

Surrey

initiatives,

agricultural

Impact

the

in

per

access,

well

justify

a

hectares

east

the it

site

to

with

to

and

Planning

minimum

restoration at

order

operator

which

largely

is

on

disposal

day)

the

per

Review Oxted

CHALKPIT

highways

the

the essential

via

as

County via

infill

the

Lane

the

the

Assessment

under

(50

northwest

day

it

could

to

site

resulting

is

Oxted,

Barrow

as

being (67

site

back

east

imposition

is

activities,

Quarry.

land management

spread

take

(Environmental

inI5O

of

requirement

which

of

may

of appropriate,

would

concluded

this,

Partnership

Council’s

acres)

scheme.

which

enters

be

and

the that

LANE

Mining

and

to

naturally

used

with

advantage

Green

A

out)

be

accommodated

of

original

the

in

has

Oxted

transport

on

voluntary

have

a

Woldingham

the

of

the

justified

of

(EIA)

the

areas

all

daily as

OXTED,

from

operator

agricultural per

Sites

The

land

Scoping

a

additional

Road.

centre

that

review

throughout

HGV

an

protocols

width

occurring

there

a

existing

ground

Quarry,

day

limit

restoration

Impact

general

is the

in

to

of

unacceptable

(ROMP)

elements

based

one-way subject

SURREY,

total,

of

traffic

achieve

tree

required

has

with

restriction

undertaken is

is

Opinion

west

Road

Oxted.

operationally.

planning

levels

land

no

imposed

activities

instructed

Assessment)

adopted

confirmed

bounded

inert

construction

and

the

upon

a

of

reason

to

approaching

of

relevant system

cap

scheme

to on

RH8

improvement

operational

of

using

planning

the

to

shrub

Chalkpit

waste

improve

the

immediately

impact

the

conditions.

1t

limit

on demonstrates

OQW

accompany

by

are

retention

by

to

The

May

evidential

inert

north,

that

is

the

to

for

planting

the

conclude

the

of

materials

Regulations

fill in

undertaken

on

the

permission

soil

2012.

the

Lane

Hurlstone

number

an

from

operation

200

infill.

life

material.

operator,

the

The

through

ROMP

fertility

annual

site

to

of

of

class

HGV

facts

local

The

and

and and

34

site

the

the

the

the

the

the

in

is of to of on on 35 the the the the and has their were used traffic levels of safety of of Oxted site period of extant ROMP recently of ongoing terms a as based based compared operations the the the in Rules with the network figures highway review of of review levels over beyond such terms highway of Site OQW process. when that the within The activity activity road in part The ongoing RH? characteristics characteristics and context with beyond terms issues, activity constraints associated local ROMP HGV HGV recorded with in voluntary the formed favourable the the the volumes. the acceptable. have in acceptable specific specific site traffic data flows activity volumes. SURREY, weighbridge constraints via for the be no no which with with are consistent the acceptable existing to traffic roads the associated traffic traffic data are Lane are traffic have are the of environmental (TS) low analysed with was OXTED, increase local found towards low daily impacts there there to weighbridge and survey roads the impacts which and associated associated roads increase LANE, Chalkpit thresholds. the the formalise to relatively network. Irom relocation

on Partnership Statement associated local to traffic associated and whilst local relatively contribute Council that revealed revealed the figures, predicted road adverse impacts carry impacts and reviewed to the flows occur the that CHALKPIT network. carry not to predicted of roads expressed roads also local was guidance. Transport volumes County guidance empirical is conditions traffic revealed a not road whilst average the also potential and they local capacity local regularise in revealed roads on QUARRY traffic queuing was considered the design to local that capacity Surrey the the they review, unacceptable unacceptable annual 2011 for annual of planning of local the are to to

the Huristone recognised review the of highway from recent reported OXTED on and the current implications development alignment, use. use. that proposed lead lead The AT of revealed proposed the which minimising was potential and assist alignment, terms of 2008 additional Quarry. that considered

that The to accommodated nationally in the also and found historic historic performance performance assessing etc. purchased (ROMP) review proposed IS geometric review capacity Oxted review was order was reduce It It against at suggested, record Potential noise environmental between development accommodated network recent when A submission. Quarry The The In network recent recently safety their permission been safety The The geometric The REVIEW 10804/03 2017 12.16 PERIODIC 12.15 12.13 JPH/1 May 12.14 12.11 12.12 12.10 12.9 12.7 12.8 May JPH/1 PERIODIC 12.24 12.23 12.22 12.21 12.20 12.19 12.18 1217 2017 10804/D3 REVIEW Whilst than HGV questionable. into in vehicles movements findings HGV dates is traffic imposing the movements site Based with This safety results considered, impact this In period. assessment highest suggest In been undertaken 5CC an flexibility limit restrictions Notwithstanding the necessary, order summary, average uplift the traffic (ROMP) on one-off the traffic updated traffic based area. accommodated. the sought survey the or on of in other impact daily using typical to of a in

environmental The a recommencement in an the geometric and the higher is travelling address permitted limit the on A associated figure. AT day on which of per daily specifically average comparable accommodated data to even operations and Transport petition a the updated that a the of OX the HGV justify on report. day figure to these figure level HGV same peak hourly TED on equates

operator Huristone day HGV with associated annual SCC’s constraints along (181 waste activity Chalkpit of of of its QUARRY findings of with higher variations traffic, thresholds. assessment, was covered the road Statement 425 57 at activity flows However, activity routes stance 362 in concerns, to Chalkpit average Oxted imports via of loads chalk highest signatures on associated / considerably network, 362 infill which than Lane 181 with movements recorded new Surrey the in of is CHALKPIT could the on which Quarry /114 HGV exports the justified activities Chalkpit also out) to the the route. given Lane planning figure provided daily the preceding found the it 200,000 area the County be HGV movements led average remains peak considers with have clearly basis

at review Partnership would has accommodated, flows benefit from detailed that higher LANE, technically, to and the per Oxted Lane at movements chalk conditions, daily the by been been Oxted Council tonnes that years HGV that led no the day not undertaken being the and 5CC were OXTED, Council of than the Quarry flow exports to in in limit a site, per breach the assessed a could conclusion Quarry flows therefore when long-standing per its and the limit from considered, (SCC) increase should noted, day the recorded activity which which is view, per SURREY, funding annum, TS. weighbridge despite underpinned on on be at acceptable the proposed September (181 next has in day. sought 40,000 it HGV SCC Chalkpit in adopted October there imposed no had day utilises This was in that been in the highest at an which, the assessment traffic RH8 it / Both not traffic consider to concern the would recognised independent 181 was to whilst context was tonnes repeated in fact day the highway led during Lane 2016. 2016, impose the 00W based site a this when associated out), terms day no importing maximum found that variations to same not calculation no of of such quantum per were evidence accidents. of which during noting the combined the 362 residents upon allow had condition additional using capacity, of updated that that annum, type review a period lower safety HGV fill HGV been limit pre daily with the 36 that had the any the the the of of is to of is in in to to on 37 not the the it this site and who their M25 SCC HGV wear Lane years pinch Oxted to higher Ridge, design powers despite 5 route the Chalkpit than potential the widening and would 362 operate the result, impact undertake at associated the capacity with The the effective. on 2012. of of a of least pro-active date, at to certain subsequently related of residents and Chalkpit be other via at As existing to 00W area business. Rules demonstrate until carriageway traffic to by below of level this part was south 5CC extraordinary that vehicles for reserve been residual even impact the north RH8 the can congestion bridge Site of these manage for HGV it the associated how the to 5CC likely has such the Quarry that remain noted improvements to surveys the the to of appeared railway. not severe northern residential level by may is signatures the of event maintenance activity, It a affecting organisation. a railway who SURREY. via undertaken the the Oxted but of or damage in consider main the duplicates traffic 1200 of volumes drivers involved the HGVs apparent considered in gateway recompense condition of impact from been the not retains flow, south. along confirmed at is a the / levels OXTED. consider route This result has impose which adversely for south operator, the it did to other of the causing seek to 1980, have individual it route to commissioned not 2008 extraordinary etc. kerbs traffic peak not to petition the to beyond the LANE are cumulative Act control a was at form whether to the occur. without did any be

May Partnership to data, HGV condition the report minimise repairs Road seeks as surveys, travelling volumes, the upon would 7th pursued. Partnership a even led HGVs powers cleaning particular installed to or signal requirement flow of known in that the guidance. a would be envisaged. operator a CHALKPIT Highways possible the dwellings has Green restrict to This traffic levels, HGVs not traffic therefore SCC potentially undertake order gulley the Quarry burden impose from the is report traffic operator by found works those in not that to option the four indicates design It Hurlstone as by feature to of to and impose all Lane. of could whilst the measures, Barrow by and already QUARRY. higher 5CC 59 that The Oxted route maintenance to practically arising such would which cause that Lane. attributable beyond the and no the as relevant the additional

Authority Huristone calming is unacceptable referred day, network 5CC, perception had Chalkpit should OXTED of far necessary considered works calming Section capacity route, that or an option exception which the flows of measures, Authority and seeking which congestion confirmed as AT per bridge not the the restrictions on use Chalkpit traffic against the report the avoid bridge. with As of a under the understand of

traffic The assessed has also site, routine to affected use upon the it where request unusual flows with calming is imposes Highway be preferred alternative the similar confirmed tear occurred also regular considered the order Having beyond has movements and has not 2003, the and We engaging with reach enforcement, Quarry 5CC based The accommodate between capacity the points Motorway traffic verges. the Lane, installed in may traffic capacity congestion One access, Whilst improvements At REVIEW(ROMP) 10804/03 2017 2.25 12.32 12.30 12.31 PERIODIC JPH/1 12.28 12.29 May 1 12.27 1226 The Huristone Partnership

ChalkpitLane. As a result, in accordancewith nationalpolicy,planningpermission should not be preventedor refused on highwaygrounds. For parallelreasons, the conditionsproposedby5CCare notnecessarytoreducethe impact.

12.33 A reviewof the cumulativeimpactof the trafficattractedto OxtedQuarrywithother developmentsincludingOxtedSandPitand PalmersWoodOilfieldhas beenundertaken. Itwas foundthat the cumulativeimpactis not significantand shouldnot influencethe determinationofthe ROMPapplication.

12.34 Despitethe insignificantimpactassociatedwiththe proposedoperationsat OxtedQuarry when assessed against the extant situation,possiblemitigationmeasures have been identifiedto safeguardthe favourablerecordintermsof highwayimpactdemonstratedin recentyears.

12.35 Potentialadditionalplanningconditionsto formalisethe existingvoluntarySiteRulesare suggested, whichare consideredto contributetowardsthe favourablehighwaysafety recordand minimisingthe potentialadverseimpactsassociatedwithongoingoperations at OxtedQuarry.

12.36 Itis alsoproposedto regularisethe relocationoftheweighbridgewithinthe siteto reduce the potentialforqueuingtooccuronChalkpitLaneviathe ROMPprocess.

12.37 Havingconsideredthe foregoing,it is concludedthat subject to the retentionof the existingplanningconditionsand the managementprotocolsadopted by the operator, there is no reason to concludethe continuationof the operationsat the site wouldhave an unacceptableimpacton the local highwaynetworkthat wouldjustifywithholding planningpermission.

12.38 Inthe event5CC considersit is essentialthat a dailylimitis imposedon the numberof HGVmovementsassociatedwithinfillactivities,the reviewundertakendemonstratesthe peak figureof 362 movementsper day wouldbe acceptable based upon national guidance. Notwithstandingthis,the operatorhas confirmedthat an annualaverageof 100HGVmovementsperday (50in/SOout)witha cap limitof200 HGVmovements(100 in/lOUout)perdaycouldbe accommodatedoperationally.

PERIODICREVIEW(ROMP)ATOXTEDQUARRY,CHALKPITLANE,OXTED,SURREYRH8OQW 38 JPH/110804/D3 May2017 9