The Changeling Submitted by Nora

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Changeling Submitted by Nora Between Performances, Texts, and Editions: The Changeling Submitted by Nora Jean Williams to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Drama In January 2016 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. Signature: ………………………………………………………….. 2 Abstract This thesis is about the ways in which Thomas Middleton and William Rowley’s play The Changeling has been edited, performed, and archived in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. It proposes a more integrated way of looking at the histories of performances and texts than is usually employed by the institutions of Shakespeare and early modern studies. Crucially, it suggests that documented archival remains of performance should be admitted as textual witnesses of a play’s history, and given equal status with academic, scholarly editions. I argue that—despite at least a century of arguments to the contrary—performance is still considered secondary to text, and that this relationship needs to become more balanced, particularly since the canon has begun to expand and early modern plays beyond Shakespeare have begun to see more stage time in recent years. In addition, I begin to theorise social media as archives of performance, and begin to suggest ways forward for archiving the performance of early modern drama in the digital turn. In order to support these arguments, I offer a series of twentieth- and twenty-first-century productions of The Changeling as case studies. Through these case studies, I seek to make connections between The Changeling as text, The Changeling as performance, and the various other texts and performances that it has interacted with throughout its life since 1961. In presenting analyses of these texts and performances side-by-side, within the same history, I aim to show the interdependency of these two usually separated strands of early modern studies and make a case for greater integration of the two in both editorial, historiographical, and performance practices. For Nora Sowma, Emily Williams, and May Jowdy. 4 Table of Contents Acknowledgements .............................................................................................. 5 Illustrations .......................................................................................................... 6 Textual Notes ...................................................................................................... 8 A Prologue ........................................................................................................... 9 Introduction: performance, text, and The Changeling ....................................... 10 Literature Review ............................................................................................... 61 Chapter One, Readings and re-readings: the Royal Court, 1961 ......................... 109 Chapter Two, Political Changelings: 1978-79 and 1988 ...................................... 132 Interlude: Bridging 1988 and 2012 ..................................................................... 180 Chapter Three, Re-making Middleton for the 21st Century: the Young Vic, 2012 ................................................................................................................... 186 Chapter Four, Documenting Past and Present at the New Globe: SWP, 2015 .... 222 Moving Forward: Conclusions .......................................................................... 298 Appendix A: Editing Samples ........................................................................... 298 Appendix B: List of UK Professional Productions and Scholarly Editions ........ 309 Bibliography ..................................................................................................... 314 Acknowledgements Like all things worth doing, this thesis was completed with a lot of help from a lot of people. All errors are my own, but I’m sure they are significantly fewer thanks to those named here. First and foremost, I wish to thank Kate Newey and Jane Milling for their supervision of this thesis. Without their expert feedback and unflagging faith, this project could not have been completed. From Exeter’s Drama department, I also wish to thank Kara Reilly, Jerri Daboo, David Wiles, Peter Thomson, Fiona Macbeth, Adrian Curtin, Cathy Turner, Michael Pearce, Gayatri Simons, Trish Barber, Jon Primrose, and Chris Mearing. From Exeter’s English department, I am particularly grateful to Pascale Aebischer, Vicky Sparey, Henry Power, Nick McDowell, Philip Schwyzer, and Sally Templemann. Thanks are due, too, to Mick Mangan and Christopher McCullough for their help in preparing my proposal, and Anna Harpin for her insightful feedback on my upgrade chapters. A number of practitioners and academics were generous enough to share their thoughts and personal archives with me both in person and by email. Thanks are due to Martin White, Joe Hill-Gibbins, Will Tosh, Terry Hands, David Ian Rabey, Susan Hamlyn and Jami Rogers. I also wish to thank the staff at the following libraries and archives for their invaluable contributions to my research: the Harry Ransom Center & Perry-Castañeda Library, University of Texas, Austin; the Folger Shakespeare Library; the British Library; the National Theatre Archives; the Manchester Central Library archives; the Shakespeare Birthplace Trust Library & Archive; the Victoria and Albert Theatre Collection; the Bristol Theatre Collection; the Wren Library, Trinity College, Cambridge; the Library of Birmingham; Staffordshire University and the Victoria Theatre Collection; and Shakespeare’s Globe Library & Archive. No one in my life has been able to escape this thesis for the past few years, and I am grateful to everyone who has listened to me give way too much detail about it. Some, however, deserve special mention for long conversations, draft reading, career advice, and general friendship and support: thank you, Callan Davies, Anna-Marie Linnell, Philip Bird, Kate Lechler, Laura Baggs, José A. Peréz Díez, Cassie Ash, Emma Smith, Emer McHugh, Kristen Zaza, Dave Nicol, Doug Bruster, and Megan Alrutz. The work would not have been possible without the generous financial support of a College of Humanities International Studentship, and I am grateful to the University of Exeter for making this funding available. I hope that funding continues to be made available to international students for many years to come. To my family (all of you!), eternal gratitude for your support of this weird thing I do. Special thanks to everyone who requested a copy of the thesis. Even more thanks to Mom, Dad, Nick, Tess, Ian and Doc for reading drafts, responding to late-night emails/texts/etc., making me laugh, and providing financial support. And, finally, thanks to my steadfast partners in crime: J.B.P, S.M., and E.O. 6 Illustrations 1. Frances, Countess of Somerset…………………………………………………105 2. 1961 Royal Court promptbook, p. 61…………………………………………..126 3. The Globe’s response to José A. Pérez Díez’s criticism of its 2015-16 winter season announcement on Facebook ……………………………………………………..236 4. The Globe’s response to my criticism of its 2015-16 winter season announcement on Twitter……………………………………………………………………………237 5. Comments from TripAdvisor users Jeffroyals and leisure_traveller44 about their visits to the SWP in 2015……………………………………………………………….239 6. Examples of Twitter users employing the #SWPChangeling hashtag…………..240 7. @The_Globe interacts with its audience through Twitter……………………...240 8. @PascaleExeter, @harrymccarthy, and I discuss the SWP Changeling without using the hashtag……………………………………………………………………………242 9. TripAdvisor user Jiinx expresses dislike of the SWP as a venue…………………252 10. Twitter users @DrJanaFunke and @shaksper express their approval of the madhouse scene in the SWP Changeling…………………………………………….256 11. Pascale Aebischer tweets about sight lines in the SWP…………………………262 12. Twitter user @RichardJColeman comments on the SWP Changeling……………265 7 Textual Notes 1) Throughout the thesis, references to text from The Changeling cite the 1653 quarto, unless otherwise specified. This means that spelling and punctuation are often early modern rather than modern; I have not flagged this within the body text except where the meaning may otherwise be obscured. 2) Deflores’ name has attracted a multitude of spellings since the seventeenth century. I use “Deflores” because it is what is printed in the quarto text. Most writers that I cite use a different configuration—most commonly “de Flores” or “De Flores”. When quoting from a secondary source, I retain the author’s spelling. 3) A large number of my sources are newspaper reviews of various productions of The Changeling. As the titles often repeat themselves (e.g. ‘The Changeling’) or become rather wordy (e.g., ‘A creepy, sexy Jacobean extravaganza every bit as nasty as today’s plays’), these have been cited using only the reviewer’s name and the date of publication after the first reference to any given review. Similarly, for press cuttings found in institutional archives, I have omitted the full bibliographic details in the main body of the thesis; full details are included in the Bibliography. Reviews found online include URLs in both the main body and
Recommended publications
  • Art and Nature in Women Beware Women
    Art and nature in Women Beware Women HOPKINS, Lisa <http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9512-0926> Available from Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/2534/ This document is the author deposited version. You are advised to consult the publisher's version if you wish to cite from it. Published version HOPKINS, Lisa (1996). Art and nature in Women Beware Women. Renaissance forum, 1 (2). Copyright and re-use policy See http://shura.shu.ac.uk/information.html Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive http://shura.shu.ac.uk RENAISSANCE forum Volume 1 Number 2, September 1996: Lisa Hopkins, ‘Art and Nature in Women Beware Women’ LISA HOPKINS SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY It has often been observed that during the course of the play, Middleton's Women Beware Women appears to undergo something of a genre shift. It begins very much in the vein of a domestic tragedy, with a tight-knit, bourgeois family group discussing their concerns about money, work, and the suitability or otherwise of a recently contracted marriage alliance - Inga- Stina Ewbank comments that 'the themes of the play are the favourite domestic and social ones of love, money and class' (Ewbank 1969, 197). By the end, it has been transformed almost beyond recognition: the two most obviously middle-class ofthe characters, Leantio and his mother, have both disappeared from the story,one of them dead and the other simply forgotten about, and the domestic setting has given place to a courtly one, where the most elaborate of elite entertainments, complete with complex special effects and arcane mythological and allegorical resonances, rounds off the play with a spectacularly artificial finale.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Nats Go Home': Modernism, Television and Three BBC
    ‘Nats go home’: modernism, television and three BBC productions of Ibsen (1971-1974) Article Accepted Version Smart, B. (2016) ‘Nats go home’: modernism, television and three BBC productions of Ibsen (1971-1974). Ibsen Studies, 16 (1). pp. 37-70. ISSN 1502-1866 doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15021866.2016.1180869 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/71899/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . Published version at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15021866.2016.1180869 To link to this article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15021866.2016.1180869 Publisher: Routledge All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online ‘Nats go home’: Modernism, television and three BBC productions of Ibsen (1971-1974) In 1964 theatre journal Encore published ‘Nats go home’, a polemical article by television screenwriter Troy Kennedy Martin. The manifesto for dramatic techniques innovated at BBC Television in the 1960s subsequently proved highly influential and is frequently cited in histories of British television drama (Caughie 2000, Cooke 2003, Hill 2007). The article called for the rejection of naturalism in television drama, and for new modernist forms to be created in its place. Kennedy Martin identified ‘nat’ television drama as deriving from nineteenth century theatrical traditions, complaining that it looked “to Ibsen and Shaw for guidance” (23).
    [Show full text]
  • September 6, 2011 (XXIII:2) Anthony Asquith and Leslie Howard, PYGMALION (1938, 96 Min)
    September 6, 2011 (XXIII:2) Anthony Asquith and Leslie Howard, PYGMALION (1938, 96 min) Directed by Anthony Asquith and Leslie Howard Written by George Bernard Shaw (play, scenario & dialogue), W.P. Lipscomb, Cecil Lewis, Ian Dalrymple (uncredited), Anatole de Grunwald (uncredited), Kay Walsh (uncredited) Produced by Gabriel Pascal Original Music by Arthur Honegger Cinematography by Harry Stradling Edited by David Lean Art Direction by John Bryan Costume Design by Ladislaw Czettel (as Professor L. Czettel), Schiaparelli (uncredited), Worth (uncredited) Music composed by William Axt Music conducted by Louis Levy Leslie Howard...Professor Henry Higgins Wendy Hiller...Eliza Doolittle Wilfrid Lawson...Alfred Doolittle Marie Lohr...Mrs. Higgins Scott Sunderland...Colonel George Pickering GEORGE BERNARD SHAW [from Wikipedia](26 July 1856 – 2 Jean Cadell...Mrs. Pearce November 1950) was an Irish playwright and a co-founder of the David Tree...Freddy Eynsford-Hill London School of Economics. Although his first profitable writing Everley Gregg...Mrs. Eynsford-Hill was music and literary criticism, in which capacity he wrote many Leueen MacGrath...Clara Eynsford Hill highly articulate pieces of journalism, his main talent was for Esme Percy...Count Aristid Karpathy drama, and he wrote more than 60 plays. Nearly all his writings address prevailing social problems, but have a vein of comedy Academy Award – 1939 – Best Screenplay which makes their stark themes more palatable. Shaw examined George Bernard Shaw, W.P. Lipscomb, Cecil Lewis, Ian Dalrymple education, marriage, religion, government, health care, and class privilege. ANTHONY ASQUITH (November 9, 1902, London, England, UK – He was most angered by what he perceived as the February 20, 1968, Marylebone, London, England, UK) directed 43 exploitation of the working class.
    [Show full text]
  • Reminder List of Productions Eligible for the 90Th Academy Awards Alien
    REMINDER LIST OF PRODUCTIONS ELIGIBLE FOR THE 90TH ACADEMY AWARDS ALIEN: COVENANT Actors: Michael Fassbender. Billy Crudup. Danny McBride. Demian Bichir. Jussie Smollett. Nathaniel Dean. Alexander England. Benjamin Rigby. Uli Latukefu. Goran D. Kleut. Actresses: Katherine Waterston. Carmen Ejogo. Callie Hernandez. Amy Seimetz. Tess Haubrich. Lorelei King. ALL I SEE IS YOU Actors: Jason Clarke. Wes Chatham. Danny Huston. Actresses: Blake Lively. Ahna O'Reilly. Yvonne Strahovski. ALL THE MONEY IN THE WORLD Actors: Christopher Plummer. Mark Wahlberg. Romain Duris. Timothy Hutton. Charlie Plummer. Charlie Shotwell. Andrew Buchan. Marco Leonardi. Giuseppe Bonifati. Nicolas Vaporidis. Actresses: Michelle Williams. ALL THESE SLEEPLESS NIGHTS AMERICAN ASSASSIN Actors: Dylan O'Brien. Michael Keaton. David Suchet. Navid Negahban. Scott Adkins. Taylor Kitsch. Actresses: Sanaa Lathan. Shiva Negar. AMERICAN MADE Actors: Tom Cruise. Domhnall Gleeson. Actresses: Sarah Wright. AND THE WINNER ISN'T ANNABELLE: CREATION Actors: Anthony LaPaglia. Brad Greenquist. Mark Bramhall. Joseph Bishara. Adam Bartley. Brian Howe. Ward Horton. Fred Tatasciore. Actresses: Stephanie Sigman. Talitha Bateman. Lulu Wilson. Miranda Otto. Grace Fulton. Philippa Coulthard. Samara Lee. Tayler Buck. Lou Lou Safran. Alicia Vela-Bailey. ARCHITECTS OF DENIAL ATOMIC BLONDE Actors: James McAvoy. John Goodman. Til Schweiger. Eddie Marsan. Toby Jones. Actresses: Charlize Theron. Sofia Boutella. 90th Academy Awards Page 1 of 34 AZIMUTH Actors: Sammy Sheik. Yiftach Klein. Actresses: Naama Preis. Samar Qupty. BPM (BEATS PER MINUTE) Actors: 1DKXHO 3«UH] %LVFD\DUW $UQDXG 9DORLV $QWRLQH 5HLQDUW] )«OL[ 0DULWDXG 0«GKL 7RXU« Actresses: $GªOH +DHQHO THE B-SIDE: ELSA DORFMAN'S PORTRAIT PHOTOGRAPHY BABY DRIVER Actors: Ansel Elgort. Kevin Spacey. Jon Bernthal. Jon Hamm. Jamie Foxx.
    [Show full text]
  • TV & Radio Script
    WELCOME TO OUR VILLAGE, PLEASE INVADE CAREFULLY EPISODE 2.3: QUESTIONING LOYALTIES BY EDDIE ROBSON Lawrence/ Scottish Doctor Michael Bertenshaw Richard Peter Davison Uljabaan Charles Edwards Margaret Jan Francis Ron Dave Lamb Kat Hattie Morahan Lucy Hannah Murray Computer / Graham John-Luke Roberts Producer: Ed Morrish Reh/Rx: 14:00-22:00, 27/06/14 Venue: BBC Radio Theatre, Broadcasting House, London W1W 1AA Charge Code: PAH – 4231 – VILL Tape/ Prog No: PLN 425 14 LJ 0029 LH0 SMs: Marc Wilcox and Victoria Prandle PC: Matthew Oldham TX: BBC Radio 4, 11:30, 29/10/14 1 1 GRAMS SWARM OF EVIL (UNDER) 2 INTRO: Welcome To Our Village, Please Invade Carefully, by Eddie Robson. Episode three: Questioning Loyalties. 3 GRAMS OUT 2 SCENE 1 EXT. PARK 1 F/X: LAWRENCE, THE PARK KEEPER (40s), JANGLES HIS KEYS AS HE PREPARES TO UNLOCK A SHED. 2 KATRINA: Lawrence! Don’t open that shed! 3 LAWRENCE: Hello Katrina. How’s your mum and dad? 4 KATRINA: Normal. Just like everything else. Completely normal. 5 LAWRENCE: Must be a bit funny, living with them again, staying in your old bedroom, now you’re 34! 6 KATRINA: Yes, it’s hilarious. In fact it’s one of the most amusing things about being trapped in a village that’s been invaded by aliens and cut off from the outside world. 7 LAWRENCE: Isn’t it strange how life turns out. 8 KATRINA: It’s stranger than I expected, I’ll grant you that. 9 LAWRENCE: I need to get on and mow this grass, so if you could just let me get into the shed – 10 KATRINA: Don’t look in the shed! 11 LAWRENCE: Why not? 3 1 KATRINA: Take a break.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Winter/Spring Season MAR 2014
    2014 Winter/Spring Season MAR 2014 Bill Beckley, I’m Prancin, 2013, Cibachrome photograph, 72”x48” Published by: BAM 2014 Winter/Spring Sponsor: BAM 2014 Winter/Spring Season #ADOLLSHOUSE Brooklyn Academy of Music Alan H. Fishman, Chairman of the Board William I. Campbell, Vice Chairman of the Board Adam E. Max, Vice Chairman of the Board A Karen Brooks Hopkins, President Doll’s Joseph V. Melillo, Executive Producer House By Henrik Ibsen English language version by Simon Stephens Young Vic Directed by Carrie Cracknell BAM Harvey Theater Feb 21 & 22, 25—28; Mar 1, 4—8, 11—15 at 7:30pm Feb 22; Mar 1, 8 & 15 at 2pm Feb 23; Mar 2, 9 & 16 at 3pm Approximate running time: two hours and 40 minutes, including one intermission BAM 2014 Winter/Spring Season sponsor: Set design by Ian MacNeil Costume design by Gabrielle Dalton Lighting design by Guy Hoare Music by Stuart Earl BAM 2014 Theater Sponsor Sound design by David McSeveney Leadership support for A Doll’s House provided by Choreography by Quinny Sacks Frederick Iseman Casting by Julia Horan CDG Associate director Sam Pritchard Leadership support for Scandinavian Hair, wigs, and make-up by Campbell Young programming provided by The Barbro Osher Pro Suecia Foundation Literal translation by Charlotte Barslund Major support for theater at BAM provided by: The Gladys Krieble Delmas Foundation The Fan Fox & Leslie R. Samuels Foundation, Inc. Donald R. Mullen Jr. Presented in the West End by Young Vic, The Morris and Alma Schapiro Fund The SHS Foundation Mark Rubinstein, Gavin Kalin, Neil Laidlaw The Shubert Foundation, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Shakespeare on Film, Video & Stage
    William Shakespeare on Film, Video and Stage Titles in bold red font with an asterisk (*) represent the crème de la crème – first choice titles in each category. These are the titles you’ll probably want to explore first. Titles in bold black font are the second- tier – outstanding films that are the next level of artistry and craftsmanship. Once you have experienced the top tier, these are where you should go next. They may not represent the highest achievement in each genre, but they are definitely a cut above the rest. Finally, the titles which are in a regular black font constitute the rest of the films within the genre. I would be the first to admit that some of these may actually be worthy of being “ranked” more highly, but it is a ridiculously subjective matter. Bibliography Shakespeare on Silent Film Robert Hamilton Ball, Theatre Arts Books, 1968. (Reissued by Routledge, 2016.) Shakespeare and the Film Roger Manvell, Praeger, 1971. Shakespeare on Film Jack J. Jorgens, Indiana University Press, 1977. Shakespeare on Television: An Anthology of Essays and Reviews J.C. Bulman, H.R. Coursen, eds., UPNE, 1988. The BBC Shakespeare Plays: Making the Televised Canon Susan Willis, The University of North Carolina Press, 1991. Shakespeare on Screen: An International Filmography and Videography Kenneth S. Rothwell, Neil Schuman Pub., 1991. Still in Movement: Shakespeare on Screen Lorne M. Buchman, Oxford University Press, 1991. Shakespeare Observed: Studies in Performance on Stage and Screen Samuel Crowl, Ohio University Press, 1992. Shakespeare and the Moving Image: The Plays on Film and Television Anthony Davies & Stanley Wells, eds., Cambridge University Press, 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of China
    Q2 3 Program Guide KENW-TV/FM Eastern New Mexico University June 2017 THETHETHETHE STORYSTORYSTORYSTORY OFOFOFOF CHINACHINACHINACHINA 1 When to watch from A to Z listings for 3-1 are on pages 18 & 19 Channel 3-2 – June 2017 New Fly Fisher – Wednesdays, 11:00 a.m. New Mexico True TV – Sundays, 6:30 p.m. (except 4th, 11th) American Woodshop – Saturdays, 6:30 a.m.; Thursdays, 11:00 a.m. Nightly Business Report – Weekdays, 5:30 p.m. America’s Heartland – Saturdays, 6:30 p.m. (except 10th) Nova – Wednesdays, 8:00 p.m.; Saturdays, 10:00 p.m.; America’s Test Kitchen – Saturdays, 7:30 a.m.; Mondays, 11:30 a.m. Sundays, 12:00 midnight Antiques Roadshow – Mondays, 7:00 p.m. (except 5th)/8:00 p.m. “Troubled Waters” – 3rd, 4th (except 5th, 26th)/11:00 p.m.; Sundays, 7:00 a.m. “Creatures of Light” – 10th, 11th Are You Being Served? Again! – “Why Sharks Attack” – 14th, 17th, 18th Saturdays, 8:00 p.m. (except 3rd, 10th) “Making North America: Origins” – 21st (9:00 p.m.), 24th, 25th Ask This Old House – Saturdays, 4:00 p.m. (except 10th) “Making North America: Life” – 28th (9:00 p.m.), July 1st, 2nd Austin City Limits – P. Allen Smith’s Garden Home – Saturdays, 10:00 a.m. (except 3rd) Saturdays, 9:00 p.m. (except 3rd, 10th)/12:00 midnight Paint This with Jerry Yarnell – Saturdays, 11:00 a.m. Barbecue University – Thursdays, 11:30 a.m. (ends 1st) PBS NewsHour – Weekdays, 6:00 p.m./12:00 midnight BBC World News – Weekdays, 6:30 a.m./4:30 p.m.; Fridays, 5:00 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Stylised Worlds: Colour Separation Overlay in BBC Television Plays of the 1970S
    Stylised Worlds: Colour Separation Overlay in BBC Television Plays of the 1970s Leah Panos Abstract This essay aims to understand and interrogate the use of Colour Separation Overlay (CSO) as a mode of experimental production and aesthetic innovation in television drama in the 1970s. It sets out to do this by describing, accounting for and evaluating CSO as a production technique, considering the role of key production personnel, and analysing four specific BBC productions. Deploying methodologies of archival research, practitioner interview, and close textual analysis, the essay also delivers a significant reassessment of the role of the producer and designer in the conceptualisation and realisation of small-screen dramatic fiction. Key words: studio, drama, single play, aesthetics, experimental, CSO, blue screen, designer The technique the BBC named Colour Separation Overlay (CSO), referred to as ‘Chromakey’ by ITV production companies and more commonly known as ‘blue screen’,1 was described by the author of a 1976 television writers’ training manual as ‘the biggest technological development in television in recent years’,2 and remains a principle underpinning contemporary special effects practice. This article will discuss the technique and identify some key figures within the TV industry who championed its use, whilst analysing a cycle of BBC dramas made during the 1970s and early 1980s that used CSO extensively. Although many programmes made during this period used this effect in some capacity, I will examine four aesthetically innovative, CSO-based BBC single plays which demonstrate two designers’ work with CSO: Eileen Diss designed the early CSO productions Candide (Play of the Month, TX: 16/02/73) and Alice Through the Looking Glass (TX: 25/12/73) and Stuart Walker subsequently developed a Critical Studies in Television, Volume 8, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Constructing Reputation Through Contemporaries in the Shakespeare Biopic University of Nottingh
    1 "You have no voice!": Constructing Reputation through Contemporaries in the Shakespeare Biopic PETER KIRWAN University of Nottingham The title of this special issue, “Not Shakespeare”, carries a potential double meaning. Taken one way, it invites consideration of the (hyphenated?) category “not-Shakespeare”, the compound adjective evoking Shakespeare as absent presence in a way that arguably haunts all treatments of Shakespeare’s contemporaries. Taken another way, the phrase evokes the polemic of anti- Stratfordianism, the school of thought that insists William Shakespeare is himself, in fact, Not Shakespeare.1 Both meanings problematically assume a clear and defined sense of what “Shakespeare” is, even if that “is” is simply a sense of Shakespeare’s exceptional status. These two strands of thought come together in Roland Emmerich’s 2011 film Anonymous, the historical fiction proposing Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford, was the true author of Shakespeare’s plays, presented to the public via the proxy of the illiterate, alcoholic and money-grabbing actor Shakespeare. The film prompted widespread academic backlash in the media, including articles with such headlines as “Hollywood Dishonors the Bard”, “Shakespeare- –a fraud? Anonymous is ridiculous” (both Shapiro) and “People Being Stupid About Shakesp… Or Someone Else” (Syme). Articles such as these served at the time as significant counter- polemics to the wave of popular support for the anti-Stratfordian position given a platform by the film, as well as drawing attention to the “educational packs” being sent into schools by Sony Pictures. In the event, the impact of the film, whose critical and commercial impact was muted at best, was not long-term, and with hindsight Anonymous offers useful material for serious discussion of the cultural politics regarding filmic representations of Shakespeare.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Changeling 1 Leaders: Gordon Mcmullan, King’S College London Kelly Stage, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
    2018 SAA Seminar: The New Changeling 1 Leaders: Gordon McMullan, King’s College London Kelly Stage, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Seminar Respondent: Professor Suzanne Gossett, Loyola University Chicago Seminar summary It is ten years since the publication of Gary Taylor and John Lavagnino’s landmark Oxford Middleton edition – time, we feel, for reflection on the impact of the edition and of other recent developments in Middleton studies, as well as in early modern drama more generally, on the study and teaching of The Changeling, the most frequently taught play in the Middleton canon and thus a valuable test case. Our working premise is that critical fields, especially in respect of plays prominent in the teaching canon, tend to change more glacially than we might wish, and our plan for the seminar is to assess the current state of play in Changeling studies. We aim to provoke new work in light of developments over the last decade, both those prompted by the Oxford edition and those that are freestanding by virtue of being under way before 2007. The former include Annabel Patterson’s elegant introduction to the Oxford edition and a range of related engagements with the play by, e.g., Tanya Pollard, Michael Neill, Carol Thomas Neely, Courtney Lehmann, Pascale Aebischer and Barbara Ravelhofer, as well, most recently, as essays by Jay Zysk, Brad Ryner and Jennifer Panek rethinking issues of embodiment, sexuality and religion that were hallmarks of an earlier phase of Changeling criticism. The latter include, inter alia, David Nicol’s Middleton & Rowley (2012), which directly addresses the collaborative nature of the play and throws down the gauntlet to critics' persistent tendency to ignore collaboration or downplay the scenes thought to be Rowley’s.
    [Show full text]
  • (De)Constructing Jane: Converting Austen in Film Responses Karen Gevirtz, Seton Hall University
    Seton Hall University From the SelectedWorks of Karen Bloom Gevirtz Winter 2010 (De)Constructing Jane: Converting Austen in Film Responses Karen Gevirtz, Seton Hall University Available at: https://works.bepress.com/karen_gevirtz/3/ Karen B. Gevirtz PERSUASIONS ON-LINE V.31, NO.1 (Winter 2010) (De)Constructing Jane: Converting “Austen” in Film Responses KAREN B. GEVIRTZ Karen B. Gevirtz (email: [email protected]) is an Assistant Professor of English at Seton Hall University. She is the author of Life After Death: Widows and the English Novel, Defoe to Austen (University of Delaware Press, 2005) and articles on eighteenth-century women novelists. YOU SORT OF FEEL LIKE YOU OWN HER,” Keira Knightley says of Jane Austen in an interview, adding, “And I’m sure everybody feels the same way” (“Jane Austen”). Certainly if the last two decades are any indication, just about “everybody” does feel a claim or connection not just to the works but to Austen herself. Suzanne R. Pucci and James Thompson describe an explosion of Austen-related materials in an impressive array of media, from traditional print to cyberspace, during the end of the twentieth and the beginning of the twenty-first century (1). Phases appear within this effusion, however, particularly in film responses to her work. In the 1990s, films were occupied with the novels themselves. Gradually, however, film responses have shifted their focus so that by the end of the first decade of the new millennium, a large number of Austen films present the novels not as the result of brilliant literary endeavor, but as the inevitably limited product of a historically-bound being, Austen the woman.
    [Show full text]