DOCSLIB.ORG

Jaarverslag 2017 CDA En Gelieerde Organen En Organisaties Op

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jaarverslag 2017 CDA En Gelieerde Organen En Organisaties Op Jaarverslag 2017 CDA en gelieerde Organen en Organisaties op landelijk niveau CDA Jaarverslag 2017 Inhoudsopgave I. Sector Politiek & Bestuur ................................................................................................... 4 1. Binnenland .................................................................................................... 4 1.1. Partijbestuur ................................................................................................. 4 1.2. Dagelijks Bestuur .......................................................................................... 5 1.3. Toetsingscommissie ..................................................................................... 6 1.4. Integriteits- en Royementscommissie ........................................................... 6 1.5. Commissie van Beroep ................................................................................. 7 1.6. Auditcommissie ............................................................................................. 7 1.7. Fonds Wetenschappelijk Instituut.................................................................. 8 1.8. Professor Steenkampfonds ........................................................................... 8 1.9. Onderzoekscommissie .................................................................................. 9 2. Werkgroepen en activiteiten .......................................................................... 9 2.1. Partijcongressen ........................................................................................... 9 2.2. CDA Senioren (voorheen Landelijk Ouderen Platform) ................................. 9 2.3. Basisgroep Sociale Zekerheid .....................................................................11 2.4. CDA Kleurrijk ...............................................................................................13 2.5. CDA Stedennetwerk ....................................................................................14 2.6. Gesprekken met maatschappelijke organisaties ..........................................15 2.7. Debatpartij ...................................................................................................15 2.8. Commissie Borstlap .....................................................................................16 2.9. Commissie Van Rij.......................................................................................16 2.10. Gemeenteraadsverkiezingen .......................................................................17 2.11. Taskforce Politieke Partij Nieuwe Stijl ..........................................................17 3. Buitenland ....................................................................................................19 3.1. Commissie Buitenland .................................................................................19 3.2. Bilaterale en internationale contacten ..........................................................19 3.3. Activiteiten Europese Volkspartij ..................................................................20 3.4. Eduardo Frei Stichting .................................................................................20 II. Sector Communicatie .......................................................................................................37 1. Strategische communicatie en marketing .....................................................38 2. Evenementen...............................................................................................39 3. Ledenwerving ..............................................................................................42 4. Publieksvoorlichting .....................................................................................42 5. Persvoorlichting ...........................................................................................43 6. Redactie ......................................................................................................44 7. Internet ........................................................................................................45 8. Huisstijl, vormgeving, ontwerpservice en webwinkel ....................................48 9. Permanente campagne en Verkiezingen .....................................................49 CDA Jaarverslag 2017 III. Sector HRM/Steenkampinstituut .....................................................................................52 1. CDA-leden / vrijwilligers ........................................................................................52 2. Lokale en provinciale bestuurders .........................................................................53 3. (Nieuwe) Talenten .................................................................................................54 4. (Kandidaat-)raadsleden .........................................................................................56 5. Fracties en fractievoorzitters .................................................................................58 6. Wethouders ...........................................................................................................59 7. (Kandidaat-)burgemeesters ...................................................................................60 8. Voorbereiding Gemeenteraadsverkiezingen 2018 .................................................61 9. Overige activiteiten Steenkampinstituut .................................................................61 10. Overige HRM-activiteiten ....................................................................................64 IV. Sector Financiën en Interne Organisatie .........................................................................65 1. Facilitair .................................................................................................................65 2. Systeembeheer .....................................................................................................65 3. Ledendesk ............................................................................................................66 4. Financiële administratie .........................................................................................67 V. Wetenschappelijk Instituut voor het CDA ......................................................................68 VI. Bestuurdersvereniging ..................................................................................................87 VII. CDAV ....................................................................................................................97 VIII. CDJA .................................................................................................................. 121 CDA Jaarverslag 2017 Inhoudelijk verslag I. Sector Politiek & Bestuur 1. Binnenland 1.1. Partijbestuur Het Partijbestuur bestaat uit de leden van het Dagelijks Bestuur, de voorzitters van alle provinciale afdelingen, de voorzitters van CDJA en CDAV en vijf vrijgekozen leden. Adviseurs van het Partijbestuur zijn de voorzitters van de CDA-fracties in de Eerste en Tweede Kamer en van de delegatie in het Europees Parlement, de directeur van het Wetenschappelijk Instituut, de voorzitter van de Bestuurdersvereniging en de voorzitter van de CDA-senioren. De leden en adviseurs van het Partijbestuur waren in 2017 als volgt: DAGELIJKS BESTUUR Voorzitter Mw. G.R. (Ruth) Peetoom 1e Vice-voorzitter Dhr. F.A.M. (Frank) Kerkhaert Secretaris Dhr. R.E.N. (Rutger) Ploum Penningmeester Dhr. H.P.J. (Bart) van Meijl DB-lid Dhr. E. (Efstathios) Andreou DB-lid Dhr. P.J. (Pieter-Jan) van Zanten DB-lid Mw. M.J.D. (Rianne) Donders-De Leest VRIJGEKOZEN LEDEN PARTIJBESTUUR Grote steden Dhr. A.E. (Alwyn) de Jong Bedrijfsleven/ondernemers Dhr. T.P. (Theo) Koekkoek Ouderen en zorg Dhr. R.T.B. (Reginald) Visser Sociale Zaken Mw. J. (Janny) Bakker-Klein Vrijgekozen lid Dhr. J.A. (Jacco) De Boer (tot 1 sptember 2017) VOORZITTERS PROVINCIALE AFDELINGEN Groningen Dhr. H.G.Th. (Gert) Brouwer Dhr. T. (Theo) Joosten (sinds 1 december 2017, Friesland daarvoor dhr. G.J. (Bert) Kuiper) Drenthe Dhr. R. (Robert) Kleine Overijssel Dhr. M.R.J. (Maarten) Westerduin Gelderland Dhr. P.C. (Peter) Drenth Utrecht Dhr. P.J.M.M. (Paul) van den Biggelaar Flevoland Dhr. W.G. (Wim) Faber Noord-Holland Dhr. G.E. (Gido) Oude Kotte Dhr. A.J. (Relus) Breeuwsma (sinds 1 juli 2017, Zuid-Holland daarvoor dhr. P.H.B. (Peter) Pennekamp) Zeeland Dhr. V.A.J. (Victor) Slenter Noord-Brabant Mw. I (Inge) van Dijk Limburg Dhr. H.J.G. (Harold) Schroeder CDA Jaarverslag 2017 CDJA/CDAV Mw. L.A.D. (Lotte) Schipper (sinds 27 mei 2017, daarvoor van 1 januari 2017 tot 26 mei 2017, dhr. E.D. Vz. CDJA (Ard) Warnink, voorzitter a.i.) Vz. CDAV Mw. J. (Josine) Westerbeek-Huitink ADVISERENDE LEDEN (niet-stemhebbend) Vz. EK-fractie Dhr. E.C. (Elco) Brinkman Vz. TK-fractie Dhr. S. (Sybrand) van Haersma Buma Vz. Eurodelegatie Mw. E.M.R. (Esther) de Lange Dhr. P.H.J. (Pieter Jan) Dijkman (sinds 11 april 2017, Directeur WI daarvoor dhr. R. (Rien) Fraanje) Vz. BSV Dhr. J.C.G.M. (John) Berends Vz. Kleurrijk Dhr. K.T. (Kaya) Koçak De taken van het Partijbestuur zijn onder meer: ● het leiding geven aan alle politieke en organisatorische activiteiten van en binnen de partij; ● de zorg voor de handhaving van de statuten en reglementen; ● de bespreking van het politieke beleid van de fracties in de Eerste en Tweede Kamer en van de CDA-delegatie in de EVP-fractie; ● de voorbereiding en organisatie van de verkiezing van de leden van de Eerste en Tweede Kamer en het Europees Parlement; ● het opstellen van concept-
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Eerste Kamer Der Staten-Generaal; Jaarbericht Parlementair Jaar 2014-2015 16000271
    Griffier van de Staten Provincie Geleidebrief informatief Naam voorstel Eerste Kamer der Staten-Generaal; jaarbericht parlementair jaar 2014-2015 16000271 Betreft vergadering Commissie Bestuur 22 januari 2016 Te verzenden aan Commissie Bestuur via iBabs Verzenddatum 7 januari 2016 Commissiegriffier Margreeth Trimpe 0118 - 63 14 37 [email protected] Statenadviseur Inhoudelijk ambtenaar Verantwoordelijk bestuurder Inhoudelijk Aanleiding Jaarlijks bericht over werkzaamheden en kerngegevens Eerste Kamer Overige informatie Dit jaarbericht wordt ter kennisneming geagendeerd. •1 •••• m mSfi r ••• ' ' v\. BSI K [0* ti N 2015 I 9. * o . -j 2014 - Parlementair jaar jaar Parlementair Eerste Kamer Jaarbericht iiaf i - ..»’ mmCl • • S ;> A3 Pv-jSra •c ->vi «£n& Ö •* Ö l- »• cu !'ÿ £ v ft CU s o c I i £ 1<S .. Cu yijLA ill Ö m co 5-~ J .; " CD $$$ co CL) (D Ö ® s 2 Inhoud Jaarbericht 2014-2015 • Eerste Kamer der Staten-Generaal Inleidende beschouwingen 3 2 De Eerste Kamer in internationaal verband 40 1 De Eerste Kamer in Nederland 1. De Eerste Kamer en Europa 41 en in Koninkrijksverband 8 2. Parlementaire diplomatie 46 1. Gebruik van bevoegdheden 9 2.1 Bilaterale ontvangsten 46 1.1 De Eerste Kamer als medewetgever 9 2.2 Bilaterale bezoeken 48 1.1.1 Verworpen en aangehouden wetvoorstellen 9 2.3 Interparlementaire fora en contacten 51 1.1.2 Gevolgen van amendementen 12 1.1.3 Wettelijke verankering AMvB 14 1.2 De Eerste Kamer als controleur van de regering 15 3 Bijlagen 58 1.3 Consulatie van deskundigen 18 1. Samenstelling fracties in 2014-2015 2. Toetsingskader en -criteria 21 tot 9 juni 2015 59 2.1 Rechtmatigheid 21 2.1.1 Fundamentele rechtsbeginselen en grondrechten 21 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Učinci Personalizacije Izbornih Sustava Na Političke Stranke
    Učinci personalizacije izbornih sustava na političke stranke Vujović, Zlatko Doctoral thesis / Disertacija 2019 Degree Grantor / Ustanova koja je dodijelila akademski / stručni stupanj: University of Zagreb, The Faculty of Political Science / Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Fakultet političkih znanosti Permanent link / Trajna poveznica: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:114:008971 Rights / Prava: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Download date / Datum preuzimanja: 2021-10-07 Repository / Repozitorij: FPSZG repository - master's thesis of students of political science and journalism / postgraduate specialist studies / disertations Fakultet političkih znanosti Zlatko Vujović Učinci personalizacije izbornih sustava na političke stranke: sustavi stranačkih lista s preferencijskim glasovanjem DOKTORSKI RAD Zagreb, 2018. godina Fakultet političkih znanosti Zlatko Vujović Učinci personalizacije izbornih sustava na političke stranke: sustavi stranačkih lista s preferencijskim glasovanjem DOKTORSKI RAD Mentorica: prof. dr. sc. Mirjana Kasapović Zagreb, 2018. godina Faculty of Political Science Zlatko Vujović Impact of personalisation of Electoral Systems on Political Parties: List Proportional Systems with Preferential Voting DOCTORAL DISSERTATION Supervisor(s): prof. dr. sc. Mirjana Kasapović Zagreb, 2018 year 1 Informacija o mentorici Mentorica: prof. dr. sci. Mirjana Kasapović Mirjana Kasapović, profesorica komparativne politike na Fakultetu političkih znanosti Sveučilišta u Zagrebu. Objavila je deset znanstvenih monografija - pet samostalnih i pet u suautorstvu s jednim ili dva autora - te oko 80 radova u znanstvenim časopisima i drugim znanstvenim publikacijama u Hrvatskoj, Njemačkoj, Velikoj Britaniji, SAD-u, Poljskoj, Mađarskoj, Bugarskoj i drugim zemljama. Za dvije knjige —Bosna i Hercegovina – Podijeljeno društvo i nestabilna država (2005) i Politički sustav i politika Izraela (2010) — dobila je državne nagrade za znanost. Napisala je brojne publicističke i stručne radove.
    [Show full text]
  • 50 Years of Christian Democratic Cooperation in the Euregio
    50 YEARS OF CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC COOPERATION IN THE EUREGIO Achievements and new challenges 50 YEARS OF CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC COOPERATION IN THE EUREGIO Achievements and new challenges CDA-CDU EUREGIO ASSOCIATION 2009 EDITORS AND COPYRIGHT: CDA-CDU EUREGIO ASSOCIATION CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN STUDIES PUBLISHED BY: THE SCIENCE SHOP, UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE SUPERVISORS: PROF. DR. R.WESSEL DRS. B.P.J. VAN WINSEN LAYOUT: OSHIN SINANI PRINTED BY: OCE BUSINESS SERVICE APRIL 2009 ISBN: 978-90-365-2834-4 Contents Introduction 14 Political cooperation in the EUREGIO: The CDA-CDU group and its evolution to the CDA-CDU EUREGIO Method 16 Association 54 PART I: DOCUMENT ANALYSIS 19 Conclusion to part I 58 The EUREGIO: theoretical framework 20 PART II: INTERVIEWS 59 50 Years of EUREGIO: a review 29 Interview: Franz-Josef Achterkamp 60 Interview: Günter Alsmeier 64 Introduction 29 Interview: Hans Kieliszek 68 Infrastructure and Spatial Planning 33 Interview: Maria Martens 71 Social and cultural integration: Youth and the Elderly, Education, Culture, Sport 34 Interview: Rob Meijer 74 Political cooperation in the border area: the Euregio Council 36 Interview: Arie Oostlander 78 Developments in the EUREGIO since the 1980s 37 Interview: Dr. Markus Pieper 82 Economic cooperation and cooperation in technology and Interview: Frans Willeme 85 innovation in the border area 39 Cross-border health care 42 Conclusions of part II, general conclusions and Nature, environment and agriculture 43 recommendations 89 Conclusion 44 Euregio Council 90 Promotion of the EUREGIO by
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament
    13.11.2008 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 291 /1 http://www.europarl.europa.eu/QP-WEB IV (Notices) NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT WRITTEN QUESTIONS WITH ANSWER List of titles of Written Questions by Members of the European Parliament indicating the number, original language, author, political group, institution addressed, date submitted and subject of the question (2008/C291/01) E-1522/04 (DE) by Reimer Böge (PPE-DE) and Willi Piecyk (PSE) to the Commission (17 August 2004) Subject: Special tax on temporary employment in Denmark Preliminary answer from the Commission (28 September 2004) Supplementary answer from the Commission (1 July 2005) E-1525/04 (EN) by Jens-Peter Bonde (IND/DEM) to the Commission (17 August 2004) Subject: Survey of disbursements from EAGGF Answer from the Commission (21 September 2004) E-1650/04 (EN) by Monica Frassoni (Verts/ALE) to the Commission (17 August 2004) Subject: EU funding of Portuguese waste incineration capacity in light of EU waste policy objectives Answer from the Commission (4 November 2004) P-1710/04 (EN) by Carl Schlyter (Verts/ALE) to the Commission (27 July 2004) Subject: The situation of Lake Pamvotis (Ioannina, north-west Greece) Answer from the Commission (4 November 2004) E-1800/04 (EN) by Richard Corbett (PSE) to the Commission (17 August 2004) Subject: Use of ‘cage beds' in Member States of the EU Answer from the Commission (12 October 2004) E-1801/04 (ES) by Raül Romeva (Verts/ALE) to the Council (17 August 2004) Subject: Exports of
    [Show full text]
  • Institutional Dynamics and the Transformation of Executive Politics in Europe
    Already published in the CONNEX Report Series: Volume 1: Michael Marsh, Slava Mikhaylov and Hermann Schmitt (Eds.): ”European Elections after Eastern Enlargement - Preliminary Results from the European Election Study 2004” The CONNEX Report Series No 1 575 p., Mannheim, Germany, January 2007 ISSN 1864-1539 Volume 2: Claes de Vreese and Hermann Schmitt (Eds.): ”A European Public Sphere - How much of it do we have and how much do we need?” The CONNEX Report Series No 2 426 p., Mannheim, Germany, July 2007 ISSN 1864-1539 online: http://www.connex-network.org/series Institutional Dynamics and the Transformation of Executive Politics in Europe Morten Egeberg (ed.) CONNEX Report Series Nr. 03 ISSN 1864-1539 online: http://www.connex-network.org/series Copyright © by the authors, CONNEX 2007 CONNEX – Network of Excellence University of Mannheim Mannheim Centre for European Social Research (MZES) 68131 Mannheim, Germany Tel: ++49 621 181 2840 Fax: ++49 621 181 2845 http://www.connex-network.org http://www.mzes.uni-mannheim.de Mannheim, December 2007 Cover, Layout & Typo by: Thomas Schneider, Oliver Schommer (MZES) Cover picture © by the European Commission II Editor Morten Egeberg is Director of ARENA Centre for European Studies, and Professor of Political Science, University of Oslo, Norway. The CONNEX research group 1, ‘Institutional dynamics and the transformation of European politics’ gathers about 35 participants and has been coordinated by Morten Egeberg since the beginning of CONNEX in summer 2004. He has published several books, chapters and articles in international journals on governance and public administration at a national, as well as a European Union level.
    [Show full text]
  • Učinci Personalizacije Izbornih Sustava Na Političke Stranke: Sustavi Stranačkih Lista S Preferencijskim Glasovanjem
    Fakultet političkih znanosti Zlatko Vujović Učinci personalizacije izbornih sustava na političke stranke: sustavi stranačkih lista s preferencijskim glasovanjem DOKTORSKI RAD Zagreb, 2018. godina Fakultet političkih znanosti Zlatko Vujović Učinci personalizacije izbornih sustava na političke stranke: sustavi stranačkih lista s preferencijskim glasovanjem DOKTORSKI RAD Mentorica: prof. dr. sc. Mirjana Kasapović Zagreb, 2018. godina Faculty of Political Science Zlatko Vujović Impact of personalisation of Electoral Systems on Political Parties: List Proportional Systems with Preferential Voting DOCTORAL DISSERTATION Supervisor(s): prof. dr. sc. Mirjana Kasapović Zagreb, 2018 year 1 Informacija o mentorici Mentorica: prof. dr. sci. Mirjana Kasapović Mirjana Kasapović, profesorica komparativne politike na Fakultetu političkih znanosti Sveučilišta u Zagrebu. Objavila je deset znanstvenih monografija - pet samostalnih i pet u suautorstvu s jednim ili dva autora - te oko 80 radova u znanstvenim časopisima i drugim znanstvenim publikacijama u Hrvatskoj, Njemačkoj, Velikoj Britaniji, SAD-u, Poljskoj, Mađarskoj, Bugarskoj i drugim zemljama. Za dvije knjige —Bosna i Hercegovina – Podijeljeno društvo i nestabilna država (2005) i Politički sustav i politika Izraela (2010) — dobila je državne nagrade za znanost. Napisala je brojne publicističke i stručne radove. Prevela je devet znanstvenih monografija i više članaka s njemačkoga na hrvatski jezik. Trenutačno je voditeljica doktorskog studija “Komparativna’ politika” i glavna urednica znanstvene biblioteke “Političke analize”. Članica je Hrvatskoga politološkog društva i Kluba hrvatskih humboltovaca. 5 6 Sažetak Rad se bavi istraživanjem učinaka personalizacije izbornog sustava prije svega na političke stranke i kandidate za zastupnike. Pod personalizacijom izbornog sustava smatra se uvođenje mehanizama u izborni sustav koji osiguravaju veću ulogu birača u izboru njihovih parlamentarnih zastupnika. U radu su predstavljene četiri gusto opisane studije slučaja koje su služile kao temelj za testiranje temeljne i pomoćnih hipoteza.
    [Show full text]
  • Boek Van Strafrecht
    Atlantic Ocean Baltic Sea North Sea Bay of Biscay NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM ASSESSMENT Black Sea NETHERLANDS Mediterranean Sea www.transparency.nl NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM ASSESSMENT NETHERLANDS Transparency International (TI) is the global civil Publisher: society organisation leading the fight against Transparency International Netherlands corruption. Through more than 90 chapters worldwide and an international secretariat in Berlin, TI raises Lead researcher: awareness of the damaging effects of corruption and Willeke Slingerland LLM, works with partners in government, business and civil Saxion University of Applied Sciences society to develop and implement effective measures to tackle it. Authors: Willeke Slingerland LLM, Transparency International Netherlands (TI-NL) is the Saxion University of Applied Sciences NL Chapter of TI and raises awareness about corruption Frans Eijkelhof LLM, in the Netherlands. Saxion University of Applied Sciences Dr. Michel van Hulten, Disclaimer - Every effort has been made to verify the Saxion University of Applied Sciences accuracy of the information contained in this report. All Oksana Popovych Msc., information was believed to be correct as of February Saxion University of Applied Sciences 2012. Nevertheless, Transparency International Prof. Dr. Johan Wempe, Netherlands cannot accept responsibility for the Saxion University of Applied Sciences consequences of its use for other purposes or in other contexts. This project has been funded with support Graduate students: from the Prevention of and Fight against Crime Wesam Allama and Steven Wassink Programme, European Commission - Directorate- General Home Affairs. This publication reflects the External reviewer: views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot Dr. Alex Straathof, be held responsible for any use which may be made of Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences the information contained therein.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT GGG G G G G 1999 G G 2004 G G G Session document FINAL A5-0133/2003 28 April 2003 REPORT on the Communication from the Commission concerning Corporate Social Responsibility: A business contribution to Sustainable Development (COM(2002) 347 - 2002/2261(INI)) Committee on Employment and Social Affairs Rapporteur: Philip Bushill-Matthews RR\316408EN.doc PE 316.408 EN EN PE 316.408 2/27 RR\316408EN.doc EN CONTENTS Page PROCEDURAL PAGE.............................................................................................................. 4 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION ............................................................................................. 5 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT............................................................................................ 12 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY, EXTERNAL TRADE, RESEARCH AND ENERGY ........................................................................................................................ 13 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH AND CONSUMER POLICY ............................................................................................................ 17 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT AND COOPERATION.............. 21 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON WOMEN'S RIGHTS AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES................................................................................................................... 25 RR\316408EN.doc 3/27 PE 316.408 EN PROCEDURAL PAGE By letter of 2 July 2002 the Commission forwarded to Parliament
    [Show full text]
  • Jaarverslag 2009 CDA En Gelieerde Organen En Organisaties
    Jaarverslag 2009 CDA en gelieerde Organen en Organisaties CDA Jaarverslag 2009 1 Inhoudsopgave I. Sector Politiek & Bestuur .............................................................................. 4 1. Binnenland .................................................................................................... 4 1.1. Partijbestuur ................................................................................................. 4 1.2. Dagelijks Bestuur .......................................................................................... 4 1.3. Toetsingscommissie ..................................................................................... 5 1.4. Royementscommissie ................................................................................... 5 1.5. Commissie van Beroep ................................................................................. 5 1.6. Juridische Commissie ................................................................................... 6 1.7. Commissie Termijnen ................................................................................... 6 1.8. Commissie Integriteit .................................................................................... 6 1.9. Financiële Commissie ................................................................................... 6 1.10. Fonds Wetenschappelijk Instituut.................................................................. 7 1.11. Professor Steenkampfonds ........................................................................... 7 2. Werkgroepen
    [Show full text]
  • RUG/DNPP/Repository Jaarverslagen/CDA/2015/Jaarverslag
    Jaarverslag 2015 CDA en gelieerde Organen en Organisaties op landelijk niveau CDA Jaarverslag 2015 1 Inhoudsopgave I. Sector Politiek & Bestuur .............................................................................. 4 1. Binnenland .................................................................................................... 4 1.1. Partijbestuur ................................................................................................. 4 1.2. Dagelijks Bestuur .......................................................................................... 6 1.3. Toetsingscommissie ..................................................................................... 6 1.4. Royementscommissie ................................................................................... 7 1.5. Commissie van Beroep ................................................................................. 7 1.6. Commisie Integriteit ...................................................................................... 7 1.7. Financiële Commissie ................................................................................... 8 1.8. Fonds Wetenschappelijk Instituut ................................................................. 8 1.9. Professor Steenkampfonds ........................................................................... 9 1.10. Onderzoekscommissie .................................................................................. 9 2. Werkgroepen en activiteiten .........................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • RUG/DNPP/Repository Jaarverslagen/CDA/2011/Jaarverslag
    CDA Verkiezingscongres 2012 Jaarverslagen 2011 CDA, Gelieerde Organen en Organisaties Jaarverslag 2011 CDA en gelieerde Organen en Organisaties CDA Jaarverslag 2011 1 Inhoudsopgave I. Sector Politiek & Bestuur ................................................................................ 4 1. Binnenland ...................................................................................................... 4 1.1. Partijbestuur .................................................................................................... 4 1.2. Dagelijks Bestuur ............................................................................................ 6 1.3. Toetsingscommissie ........................................................................................ 6 1.4. Royementscommissie ..................................................................................... 6 1.5. Commissie van Beroep ................................................................................... 7 1.6. Commisie Integriteit ........................................................................................ 7 1.7. Financiële Commissie ..................................................................................... 7 1.8. Fonds Wetenschappelijk Instituut ................................................................... 7 1.9. Professor Steenkampfonds ............................................................................. 8 2. Werkgroepen en activiteiten ............................................................................ 8 2.1. Partijcongressen
    [Show full text]
  • Jaarbericht Eerste Kamer 2014
    Jaarbericht Eerste Kamer Parlementair jaar 2014 - 2015 2 Inhoud Jaarbericht 2014-2015 • Eerste Kamer der Staten-Generaal Inleidende beschouwingen 3 2 De Eerste Kamer in internationaal verband 40 1 De Eerste Kamer in Nederland 1. De Eerste Kamer en Europa 41 en in Koninkrijksverband 8 2. Parlementaire diplomatie 46 1. Gebruik van bevoegdheden 9 2.1 Bilaterale ontvangsten 46 1.1 De Eerste Kamer als medewetgever 9 2.2 Bilaterale bezoeken 48 1.1.1 Verworpen en aangehouden wetvoorstellen 9 2.3 Interparlementaire fora en contacten 51 1.1.2 Gevolgen van amendementen 12 1.1.3 Wettelijke verankering AMvB 14 1.2 De Eerste Kamer als controleur van de regering 15 3 Bijlagen 58 1.3 Consulatie van deskundigen 18 1. Samenstelling fracties in 2014-2015 2. Toetsingskader en -criteria 21 tot 9 juni 2015 59 2.1 Rechtmatigheid 21 2.1.1 Fundamentele rechtsbeginselen en grondrechten 21 2. Samenstelling fracties in 2014-2015 2.1.2 Staatsrechtelijk institutionele aspecten 23 na 9 juni 2015 62 2.1.3 Toetsing aan internationaal recht 25 2.2 Uitvoerbaarheid en handhaafbaarheid 26 3. Commissies 65 2.3 Wetssystematiek en wetgevingsproces 30 2.3.1 Samenhang van wetgeving 30 4. Eerste Kamer in cijfers 66 2.3.2 Vooruitlopen op wetgeving 31 5. Index onderwerpen 70 3. Koninkrijksrelaties 32 4. Communicatie en voorlichting 35 4.1 Eerste Kamer online 35 4.2 Onderwijsprojecten 37 4.3 Eerste Kamer in de media 38 3 < Naar Inhoud Inleidende2. De Eerste beschouwingen Kamer in in internationaal verband Jaarbericht 2014-2015 • Eerste Kamer der Staten-Generaal Inleidende beschouwingen 4 < Naar Inhoud Inleidende beschouwingen Jaarbericht 2014-2015 • Eerste Kamer der Staten-Generaal Met veel genoegen bied ik u dit Jaarbericht aan, dat aan de hand van de belangrijkste gebeurtenissen en ontwikkelingen in het afgelopen jaar inzicht biedt in de wijze waarop de Eerste Kamer functioneert.
    [Show full text]