DOCSLIB.ORG

Spatial Analysis in Front Runner and Follower Cities Deliverable 2.2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Spatial Analysis in Front Runner and Follower Cities Deliverable 2.2 Dortmund © ICLEI Spatial Analysis in Front Runner and Follower Cities Deliverable 2.2 Work package: WP2 Dissemination level: Public Lead partner: URBASOFIA Author: Leopa and Elisei Due date: 28/02/2019 Submission date: 28/02/2019 proGIreg Deliverable 2.2 1 Deliverable Spatial Analysis in Front Runner and Follower Cities Deliverable No. 2.2 Work Package 2 Dissemination Level PU Author(s) Sabina Leopa, Pietro Elisei (URBASOFIA) Co-Author(s) FRC Dortmund: Dagmar Knappe (DORTMUND), Hanna Koeneke (LOHRBERG) FRC Turin: Carolina Giraldo Nohra, Silvia Barbero, Eliana Ferrulli (POLITO); Riccardo Saraco, Laura Ribotta, Elena Deambrogio (COTO); Emanuela Saporito, Chiara Guidarelli (OA) FRC Zagreb: Iva Bedenko, Matija Vuger (ZAGREB); Nives Mornar and Mirela Bokulić Zubac (ZZPUGZ); Bojan Baletić and Mladen Jošić (AF), Marijo Spajić (ZIPS) FC Cascais: Teresa Ribeiro, Helga Gonçalves (CASCAIS) FC Cluj Metropolitan Area: Sabina Leopa, Pietro Elisei (URBASOFIA); Zoltan Coraian, Adrian Raulea (CLUJ) FC Piraeus: Angeliki Paraskevopoulou, Aikaterini Oikonomou, Evagelia Mariaki, Aristeidis Paraskevas (PIRAEUS); Nerantzia Tzortzi (Julia Georgi) (KEAN) FC Zenica: Mirza Sikirić (ZEDA); Amra Mehmedić (COZ) Date 15/04/2019 File Name D2.2_proGIreg_Spatial Analysis_20190415_without Appendix.pdf Status Revised from the version submitted to the EC to include the following changes: additions to co-authorship, references, attribution of document images, minor corrections. Revision Version 1 – approved for public submission on 15/04/2019 Reviewed by (if applicable) Rieke Hansen and Axel Timpe (RWTH), Chiara Baldacchini and Gabriele Guidolotti (CNR) Information to be used for Leopa, S.; Elisei, P. et al. (2019): Spatial Analysis in Front-Runner citations of this report and Follower Cities, Deliverable No. 2.2, proGIreg. Horizon 2020 Grant Agreement No. 776528, European Commission proGIreg Deliverable 2.2 2 CONTACT: Email: [email protected] Website: www.proGIreg.eu This document has been prepared in the framework of the European project proGIreg. The sole responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors. It This project has received does not necessarily represent the opinion funding from the EU’s Horizon of the European Union. Neither the 2020 research and innovation EASME nor the European Commission programme under grant are responsible for any use that may be agreement no. 776528. made of the information contained therein. proGIreg Deliverable 2.2 3 Table of Contents Figures 6 Tables 8 Partner organisations ............................................................................................................ 9 Document revision history ....................................................................................................10 Abbreviations .......................................................................................................................11 Executive Summary .............................................................................................................12 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................14 2. Methodological approach to the Spatial Analysis ....................................................16 2.1. Initial Methodology ..................................................................................................16 2.2. Approach to working with FRC and FC ...................................................................16 3. Basic data for proGIreg cities ..................................................................................18 3.1. Front Runner City Dortmund (DE) ...........................................................................20 3.2. Front Runner City Turin (IT) ....................................................................................29 3.3. Front Runner City Zagreb (HR) ...............................................................................34 3.4. Follower City Cascais (PT) .....................................................................................40 3.5. Follower City Cluj-Napoca (RO) ..............................................................................44 3.6. Follower City Piraeus (GR) .....................................................................................48 3.7. Follower City Zenica (BA) .......................................................................................52 4. Plan and policy frameworks in proGIreg cities ........................................................57 4.1. Local plan and policy framework for Dortmund .......................................................60 4.2. Local plan and policy framework for Turin ...............................................................61 4.3. Local plan and policy framework for Zagreb............................................................64 4.4. Local plan and policy framework for Cascais ..........................................................67 4.5. Local plan and policy framework for Cluj-Napoca ...................................................69 4.6. Local plan and policy framework for Piraeus ...........................................................71 4.7. Local plan and policy framework for Zenica ............................................................73 4.8. Conclusions of the plan and policy analyses ...........................................................74 5. NBS stakeholders in proGIreg cities .......................................................................76 5.1. Stakeholder overview for Dortmund ........................................................................78 5.2. Stakeholder overview for Turin ...............................................................................82 5.3. Stakeholder overview for Zagreb ............................................................................86 5.4. Stakeholder overview for Cascais ...........................................................................89 5.5. Stakeholder overview for Cluj Metropolitan Area ....................................................91 5.6. Stakeholder overview for Piraeus ...........................................................................93 proGIreg Deliverable 2.2 4 5.7. Stakeholder overview Zenica ..................................................................................95 5.8. Conclusions on the stakeholder landscape in proGIreg ..........................................96 6. Spatial data and indicators in proGIreg cities .........................................................98 6.1. The indicator framework .........................................................................................98 6.2. Availability of indicator data in proGIreg cities ....................................................... 100 6.3. Per-partner indicator framework overview ............................................................. 105 6.4. Conclusions of the data collection ......................................................................... 107 7. Synthesis: SWOT analyses of proGIreg cities ...................................................... 108 7.1. SWOT analysis for Dortmund ............................................................................... 109 7.2. SWOT analysis for Turin ....................................................................................... 127 7.3. SWOT analysis for Zagreb .................................................................................... 143 7.4. SWOT analysis for Cascais .................................................................................. 158 7.5. SWOT analysis for Cluj-Napoca ........................................................................... 168 7.6. SWOT analysis for Piraeus ................................................................................... 182 7.7. SWOT analysis for Zenica .................................................................................... 192 8. Conclusions .......................................................................................................... 194 8.1. Conclusions on Front Runner cities ...................................................................... 194 8.2. Conclusions of the Spatial Analysis ...................................................................... 199 9. References ........................................................................................................... 204 proGIreg Deliverable 2.2 5 Figures Figure 1 - The proGIreg partnership .....................................................................................14 Figure 2 - Dortmund City plan with outer lines of Living Lab (red continuous line), Analysis Area (red dotted line) and City Level (outer black line) .........................................................21 Figure 3 - LL Area of Dortmund ............................................................................................22 Figure 4 - Northern part of Dortmund Living Lab...................................................................26 Figure 5 - Central part of Dortmund Living Lab .....................................................................27 Figure 6 - Southern part of Dortmund Living Lab ..................................................................28 Figure 7 - City of Turin with areas with main GI, urban regeneration areas and proGIreg LL area ......................................................................................................................................30 Figure 8
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Incentive Components of the Tourist Offer from the Romanian Tisa Basin – Major Markers of the Regional Tourist Development Strategy
    ROMANIAN REVIEW OF REGIONAL STUDIES, Volume VI, Number 2, 2010 THE INCENTIVE COMPONENTS OF THE TOURIST OFFER FROM THE ROMANIAN TISA BASIN – MAJOR MARKERS OF THE REGIONAL TOURIST DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY ŞTEFAN DEZSI 1, NICOLAE CIANG Ă 2, JANOS TALPAS 3 ABSTRACT – This paper makes a thoroughly analysis of the main factors which stimulate and define the tourism in the Tisa River basin in concerning both the primary touristic offer (the natural and the anthropic frame) and the infra-structural components, in order to identify the main opportunities of tourism development that are to be found as well as to prefigure the direction of this field’s development, which points out a real potential from this point of view. Consequently, after a preliminary identification of the whole range of tourist resources that are implied or can be implied in making the attractive endowment of the analysed region, we establish the main planning priorities, so that – on this basis – to indicate the main types of tourism and the possible tourist arrangements whose practising and, respectively, achievement, would permit the plenary integration of the Tisa River basin into the regional, national, and international tourist circuits. Keywords: tourist resources, tourism prospective research, attractiveness, assessment, tourist arrangements, types and forms of tourism, strategic coordinates, development strategies INTRODUCTION The overlapped geographical space of the Romanian Tisa river basin – integrating entirely ten counties (Alba, Arad, Bihor, Bistri Ńa-Năsăud, Cluj, Hunedoara, Maramure ş, Mure ş, S ălaj, Satu Mare) and partially other three counties (Harghita, Sibiu and Timis) - has enough arguments from a tourist point of view, as well for the integration into the national tourism, for the involvement in the global – European international tourism, and also for attracting tourist flows from the neighbouring countries (Hungary, Ukraine and even Serbia), as well as from the whole Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Formica Pratensis Supercolony in the Hoia Forest (Cluj Napoca, Romania)
    Biologia | Acta Scientiarum Transylvanica, 18/1, 2010. Formica pratensis supercolony in the Hoia Forest (Cluj Napoca, Romania) Klára Kiss1, Ottília Tímea Kóbori2 1Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania, Department of Horticulture, Op. 9, P.O. box 4, 540485 Târgu Mureş/Corunca, Romania, [email protected]. 2Hungarian Academy of Sciences Biological Research Cent­ re Institute of Plant Biology, H–6726 Szeged, Temesvári krt. 62. Abstract More than 150 ant species are able to form polydomous colonies. They are characterized by interconnected nests where the workers are tolerant to­ ward other workers from different nests of the same colony. Our goal was to find the social structure of the Formica pratensis nest aggregation from a clearing in the Hoia Forest (Cluj County, Romania). Aggressiveness tests were made between workers from nests situated in different distances to each other. The difference between intranest and internest aggressiveness was not significant and the first neighbors were as aggressive with each other as the second neighbors. The studied nest aggregation was a super­ co lony. Unfortunately the nest number decreased drastically from 50 in 2004 to 8 in 2010 probably because of the activity of hikers. We suppose that the social structure of the nest aggregation is not polydomous in pres­ ent. The affirmation of the change in social structure of this colony can be the next issue in this research. Keywords: Formica pratensis, polydomous, Cluj Napoca. Introduction Social structure in ants is very divers. The principal reason of this diversity is the variation in queen number (Bourke and Franks 1995). We can speak about mono­ and polygynous colonies, the colony can live in one single or in more nests.
    [Show full text]
  • The Local Public Administration Initiates the Branding Process of Cluj-Napoca
    Proceedings of the 5th WSEAS International Conference on Economy and Management Transformation (Volume II) The Local Public Administration Initiates the Branding Process of Cluj-Napoca Professor, PhD LIVIU ILIEŞ Department of Management Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Universitatea Babeş-Bolyai din Cluj-Napoca Teodor Mihali Street No 58-60, 400591 Cluj-Napoca ROMÂNIA [email protected] http://www.econ.ubbcluj.ro Lecturer PhD ALEXANDRA VIORICA DULĂU Department of Modern Languages and Business Communication Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Universitatea Babeş-Bolyai din Cluj-Napoca Teodor Mihali Street No 58-60, 400591 Cluj-Napoca ROMÂNIA [email protected] http://www.econ.ubbcluj.ro Teaching Assistant, PhD Candidate MONICA MARIA COROŞ Business Department Faculty of Business, Universitatea Babeş-Bolyai din Cluj-Napoca Horea Street No 6, 400174 Cluj-Napoca ROMÂNIA [email protected] http://www.tbs.ubbcluj.ro Master Student MARIUS EMIL COROŞ Public Administration Department Faculty of Political, Administration and Communication Sciences, Universitatea Babeş-Bolyai Cluj-Napoca General Traian Moşoiu Street No 71, 400132 Cluj-Napoca ROMÂNIA [email protected] http://www.apubb.ro Abstract: Starting from Simon Anholt’s city branding hexagon, we intend to identify those elements that are relevant for the branding project of the city initiated by the local public administration. We attempt to find an answer to the following two questions: How do first year students enrolled at Universitatea Babeş-Bolyai perceive the city in relation with Transylvania? And How is Cluj-Napoca’s tourist potential appreciated by other Romanian’s? The results of our paper rely on the finding of two different survey-based researches that we have undertaken in 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Cluj-Napoca 2018 Foreword Collecting Data and Using It to Better Understand How the City Works Is a Process Underlying Any Smart City
    Cluj-Napoca City Hall and Local Council Cluj-Napoca 2018 Foreword Collecting data and using it to better understand how the city works is a process underlying any smart city. The numbers allow us to see whether the evolution is in line with the city's long-term development strategy, but also assure us that we can take action as soon as possible, if needed, to redress trends in the targeted direction. This is why an endeavor coming from market specialists towards the community and local administration is all the more valuable, because it brings with it the expertise and effort of well documented people along with the constancy of analyzing this type of very specific data on an annual basis. Cluj is made up by the people of the city, and this is an example of good practice on how the local ecosystem of innovation can generate a context that will lead to the city's development. Transparency, communication and availability of the analyzed and processed data are elements that make the Real Estate Transactions Guide a very useful tool for the residents of Cluj and for those who choose Cluj as destination for their investments. Emil Boc Mayor of Cluj-Napoca 2 Dear readers, 67% of the money invested in real estate purchases came from Out of the EUR 214 million traded in the first 5 months of own resources in 2018, and the main destination remained 2019, apartment purchases remain the driver of the real The 6th Edition of the Real Estate Transactions Guide, carried the segment of apartments, with 64% of the total.
    [Show full text]
  • End Review 09-14 Pre-Final 15.01.2019
    End review of the EEA and Norway Grants 2009-2014 Rapid assessment: final report Photo credit: Bogdan Croitoru March, 2019 1 Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Iceland, Liechtenstein or Norway, or of the Financial Mechanism Office. The date of extraction of each set of figures is noted throughout the report. The figures are subject to change until all programmes financed under the 2009-2014 EEA and Norwegian Financial Mechanisms are officially closed. 1 Executive Summary The End Review of the European Economic Area (EEA) and Norway Grants 2009-2014 was performed in the period September 2018 - January 2019 by a team of Ecorys experts1 under a contract with the Financial Mechanism Office (FMO), the Brussels-based secretariat for EEA and Norway Grants. The assessment had the following main objectives: • To document and assess the achievements (including bilateral results) of the programmes funded by the EEA and Norway Grants; • To identify the main factors influencing the achievement/non-achievement of the objectives; • To assess the relevance of the Grants to policy priorities, European Union (EU) funding and evidence base. How was it done? The End Review applied a two-tiered approach: (1) an overall presentation of the achievements covering all countries and sectors, followed by (2) a deeper analysis based on five pre-selected priority sectors (Climate change and renewable energy; Green industry innovation; Justice and home affairs; Culture; and Research and scholarships) and six Beneficiary States (Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Lithuania, Poland, Portugal and Romania).
    [Show full text]
  • City Branding for Cluj-Napoca. a Case of the Local Public Administration Initiative
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS AND COMMUNICATIONS Issue 3, Volume 4, 2010 City Branding for Cluj-Napoca. A Case of the Local Public Administration Initiative Liviu Ilieş, Alexandra Viorica Dulău, Monica Maria Coroş, Marius Emil Coroş shortcomings of the place (poor infrastructure, high Abstract—The main aim of our present analysis is to identify unemployment, high cost of living combined with low those elements that are relevant for the branding project of Cluj- incomes, unstable economic environment, unskilled Napoca, Transylvania’s most important economic center and a key workforce, increasing taxation, corruption, etc.). destination of Romania. Therefore, starting from the city branding hexagon, the tool used by Simon Anholt for the elaboration of the A. An Overview of Modern Romania’s Image Promotion City Brand Index, we attempt to identify those elements that are In spite of the fact that “Romania has almost all the features relevant for the branding project of the city initiated by the city hall of the municipality. Throughout our paper we are going to provide to be one of the preferred tourist destinations: it is blessed with answers to several questions: How do first year students enrolled at a beautiful landscape, it can offer different types of tourism Universitatea Babeş-Bolyai perceive the city in relation with (mountain tourism, heritage and cultural tourism, rural Transylvania? How is Cluj-Napoca’s tourist potential appreciated tourism, spa tourism, geotourism, MICE tourism – meeting, by other Romanians? How do Romanian local public authorities incentives, conferences and exhibitions – seaside tourism) and understand to get involved in the branding processes of their cities? it has a diversified supply and lodging capacities” [4] the Are the websites of the city halls used as communication tools in the promotion of Romanian destinations? The results of our paper rely country is far from properly exploiting its tourist heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • CLUJ-NAPOCA 20212021 EUROPEAN CAPITAL of CULTURE Candidate City
    CLUJ-NAPOCACLUJ-NAPOCA 20212021 EUROPEAN CAPITAL OF CULTURE Candidate City SELECTIONSELECTION PHASEPHASE BID BOOK SELECTION PHASE CLUJ-NAPOCA 2021 EUROPEAN CAPITAL OF CULTURE Candidate City Table of contents Introduction – General considerations 3 1. Contribution to the long-term strategy 8 2. European dimension 14 3. Cultural and artistic content 22 4. Capacity to deliver 67 5. Outreach 73 6. Management 81 Additional information 100 INTRODUCTION General Considerations Introduction 3 0.1 Why does your city wish to take part in the competition for the title of European Capital of Culture? Cluj-Napoca is applying for the European Capital of Culture title for We are a candidate city for the European Capital of Culture title three main reasons: because we want to transform this federation into a ‘union’ of Cluj- To engage the communities of the city in a common Napoca’s communities. life-changing project, with the ability to transform us from a federation of communities into a union, while helping us to fulfil In order to achieve this we need something to connect us a common our potential to act as a community; experience on which we build our common story, our common grand To become a leading European city in arts and culture; narrative. We soon realised that this something can be nothing less To make culture work for the development of our city, than our own identity project. However, our processes cannot be only fostering co-production models between culture, economy about our past, but they must also be about restorative reconciliation and the socio-urban texture to facilitate the establishment of a of class, race, ethnic and gender differences.
    [Show full text]
  • CLUJ-NAPOCA CANDIDATE CITY for EUROPEAN CAPITAL of CULTURE 2021 East of West
    Application form CLUJ-NAPOCA CANDIDATE CITY FOR EUROPEAN CAPITAL OF CULTURE 2021 East of West Cluj-Napoca embarked on the process leading to the European Capital of Culture application five years ago. It has been a complex and rewarding process. We are opening towards ourselves and towards Europe. We invite artists and people across Europe to join us in an urban laboratory where our experiments and small- scale innovations are taken to a next level. The one where cultural vitality provides the grounds for a fulfilling life for all. Where public sphere is imagined and built through participation. A level where our assets - academic and artistic excellence, social innovation, a young population, a diverse culture and a vital economy - can be catalysed, through culture, to be a model for European urban living. Culture is our mean to heal, to connect and to grow. As a community, as a city, as Europe. Emil Boc MAYOR OF CLUJ-NAPOCA CITY Introduction – General considerations 3 Introduction 0.1 Why does your city wish to take part in the competition for the title of European Capital of Culture? Table of contents Cluj-Napoca has always been considered “the heart of Today we feel that our city is awakening, The community Transylvania” and, for the last 100 years, has also been one is more and more alive. We do not know if the past will not of the most important cities in Romania. We, its inhabitants, return, but we are determined to carry on. are multicultural not by choice, but - as in many other parts in Europe - by destiny.
    [Show full text]
  • Cluj Adrian.Qxd
    Cluj-Napoca claudiopolis klausenburg kolozsvár Descrierea CIP a Bibliotecii Na]ionale a României TUDOR, OCTAVIAN Pictori români uita]i / Tudor Octavian. Bucure[ti: NOI Media Print, 2003 ISBN 973-7959-02-7 75(498) Cluj-Napoca claudiopolis klausenburg kolozsvár Clujul, în a doua jum`tate a secolului al XIX-lea Vedere general`, dup` o gravur` de M. Kolb, K. Gungen, L. Rohbock [i multiplicat` la Darmstadt în 1864. Cluj in the second half of the 19th century General view after an engraving by M. Kolb, K. Gungen, L. Rohbock, printed in Darmstadt, in 1864. Cuprins Contents Scurt istoric Short history 8 Via]a cultural` The cultural life 36 Peisaj citadin Cityscape 54 Parcuri, gr`dini Parks, gardens 92 8 Scurt istoric A short history Ora[ul Cluj-Napoca este situat în nord- The city of Cluj-Napoca is situated in vestul României, la hotarul dintre Mun]ii north-western Romania on the border Apuseni, Podi[ul Some[an [i Câmpia separating the Apuseni Mountains, the Transilvaniei. Cu o popula]ie de 334 543 Somesan Plateau and the Transylvanian Plain. locuitori în anul 2000, ora[ul se num`r` One can say that the city lying on the banks printre cele mai mari localit`]i din ]ar`. of the Some[ul Mic River attracts visitors by its Se poate spune c` ora[ul de pe Some[ul peculiar features that come from the Mic atrage printr-un specific aparte, izvorât picturesque blend of cultures and religious din amestecul pitoresc de culturi [i faiths having existed in this place for centuries. confesiuni sedimentate de secole în aceste As Mircea Zaciu put it too, this city is “a locuri.
    [Show full text]
  • Real Estate Transactions Guide Dear Readers
    Cluj-Napoca City Hall and Local Council Cluj-Napoca 2020 Real Estate Transactions Guide Dear readers, The 8th Edition of the Real Estate Transactions Guide, carried out by Veridio in partnership with the The value of apartment transactions decreased by 2% compared to 2019, but the average price per City Hall of Cluj-Napoca, is based on the information collected by the City Hall from the sale-purchase square meter of apartments in 2020 increased to 1,477 EUR/sqm, by over 8.4% compared to 2019. agreements concluded in 2020. 70% of buyers are from Cluj County, but the interest from nearby counties is maintained, so that over In this year’s edition it is observed that at the entire level of the real estate market of Cluj-Napoca, 28% of buyers in 2020 come from other counties, and just under 2% come from abroad. the COVID 19 pandemic had a minor impact, followed by a rapid recovery. There was a higher We invite you to find many other interesting details by browsing the pages of the eighth edition of interest in houses and plots of land, which led to higher prices for these types of properties the Cluj-Napoca Real Estate Transactions Guide. We find that the real estate market in Cluj-Napoca experienced an intense activity in 2020, with real Adrian Vascu estate transactions of almost EUR 680.6 million, at a similar level with the previous year. However, the value distribution is different, so that land transactions increased by 36% (EUR 31 million), and Senior Partner Veridio house transactions increased by 11% (EUR 92 million) compared to 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharepress Lowres
    SHAREPRESS The Dear Friend, Message The official magazine of the Youth@Cluj-Napoca 2015 Programme | Edition 0, 2012 Europeans are facing many challenges in this/OUR day and age. As the economy fights its way through recession across the continent, new pressures are being exerted on our societies; pressures felt most keenly at our lines of division, be them political, social, ethnic or religious. As we search for new paths to lead us into social and economic harmony we must look to/AT our youth, the future of our continent and the creative centre of discovery and renewal. From Cluj-Napoca SHARE POWER So: to Europe UNDERSTAND our youth; their habits, their innovative power, their Cluj-Napoca willingness to learn and work, their way of thinking and their potential to start and SHARE foster change. In order to build our future with Interviews JOY them we have to understand their role at local, regional, national and European levels. Keywords SHARE SHARE EXPERIENCE our youth; their dynamics, their energy, their creativity VISION CULTURE and their desire for difference. Seeing youth in action is the best way of Key Figures boosting social development and change. Priorities INVOLVE youth in debates about our joint local, regional and SHARE European future. What we learn, what we decide, what we create Locations SPACE will be what the present youth will live in the future. So, let youth be part of it when we plan it. Projects SHARE CREATE with youth. Young people have the most powerful way of 2012 key moments thinking outside the box, of facing challenges, of mobilizing WORK power for change for a brighter future.
    [Show full text]
  • Generational Impact in the Hospitality Industry
    in partnership with Universitatea “Ștefan cel Mare” din Universitatea Româno-Americană, Suceava București Facultatea de Științe Economice și Administrație Publică Generational impact in the Hospitality Industry October 5th-6th, 2018, Cluj-Napoca, România https://tbs.ubbcluj.ro/ehi18/ RISOPRINT Cluj-Napoca 2018 Proceedings of the International Conference ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN THE HOSPITALITY INDUSTRY, 5th edition, Generational impact in the Hospitality Industry October 5th-6th, 2018, Cluj-Napoca, România Edited by: Smaranda Adina Cosma, Cristina Fleșeriu, Adina Letiția Negrușa, Marius Bota, Valentin Toader ISBN: 978-973-53-1395-2 Scientific Committee Prof. dr. Heike Bahre, University of Applied Sciences Berlin/ University of Economics, Technology and Culture, Germany Assoc. Prof. dr. Carmen Băbăiţă, Universitatea de Vest, Timişoara, România Assoc. Prof. dr. Gina Ionela Butnaru, Universitatea AI Cuza, Iași, România Prof. dr. Medet Yolal, Anadolu University, Turkey Assoc. Prof. dr. Carmen Chasovschi, Universitatea Ștefan cel Mare, Suceava, România Prof. dr. Smaranda Adina Cosma, Universitatea Babeș-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca, România Prof. dr. Daniela Firoiu, Universitatea Româno-Americană, București, România Prof. dr. Delia Popescu, Academia de Studii Economice, București, România Prof. dr. Bogdan Glăvan, Universitatea Româno-Americană, București, România Prof. dr. Laura Bacali, Universitatea Tehnică, Cluj-Napoca, România Prof. dr. Onur Gulbahar, Okan University, Turkey Prof. dr. Gabriela Țigu, Academia de Studii Economice, București, România Prof. dr. Valentin Hapenciuc, Universitatea Ștefan cel Mare, Suceava, România Prof. dr. Carmen Năstase, Universitatea Ștefan cel Mare, Suceava, România Assoc. Prof. dr. Adina Letiția Negrușa, Universitatea Babeș-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca, România Assoc. Prof. dr. Alexandru Nedelea, Universitatea Ștefan cel Mare, Suceava, România Prof. dr. Gabriela Prelipcean, Universitatea Ștefan cel Mare, Suceava, România Prof.
    [Show full text]