DOCSLIB.ORG

Cederberg Municipality Final Idp Review 2016/17

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cederberg Municipality Final Idp Review 2016/17 CEDERBERG MUNICIPALITY FINAL IDP REVIEW 2016/17 May 2016 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE MAYOR’S FOREWORD......................................................................................................... 6 MUNICIPAL MANAGER’S FOREWORD ................................................................................................... 7 CHAPTER 1 ......................................................................................................................................... 10 1.1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 10 1.2. THE ROLE AND PURPOSE OF THE IDP ................................................................................... 10 1.3. LEGAL CONTEXT .................................................................................................................. 11 1.4. MUNICIPAL SNAPSHOT........................................................................................................ 12 1.5. Strategic Framework of the IDP ........................................................................................... 13 1.5.1. Vision and Mission ....................................................................................................... 13 ....................................................................................................................................................... 13 1.6. THE IDP PROCESS ................................................................................................................ 16 CHAPTER 2 ......................................................................................................................................... 27 2.1. GEOGRAPHIC PROFILE.............................................................................................................. 27 2.2. DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE .......................................................................................................... 31 2.2.1. Population Growth ............................................................................................................ 31 2.2.2. Distribution by Gender and Age ........................................................................................ 33 2.3. SOCIO ECONOMIC .................................................................................................................... 34 2.3.1. Economic Profile ............................................................................................................... 34 2.3.2. Poverty ............................................................................................................................. 36 2.3.3. Employment Patterns........................................................................................................ 38 2.3.4. EDUCATION ....................................................................................................................... 40 2.3.5. HEALTH ............................................................................................................................. 44 2.3.6. SAFETY AND SECURITY ...................................................................................................... 47 2.4. SOCIAL GRANTS ....................................................................................................................... 48 2.5. KEY ECONOMIC SECTORS AND EMLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY ...................................................... 48 2.6. ACCESS TO FREE BASIC SERVICES ............................................................................................. 52 2.7. Western Cape Joint Planning Initiatives .................................................................................... 52 CHAPTER 3 ......................................................................................................................................... 54 3.1. SWOT ANALYSIS ....................................................................................................................... 54 3.2. STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................ 56 3.3. NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN (NDP) 2030 ........................................................................... 57 3.4. PROVINCIAL STRATEGIC PLAN 2014-2019................................................................................. 58 1 | P a g e 3.5. Strategic Alignment with National/Provincial/District............................................................... 58 3.6. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREAS AND FUNCTIONAL PRIORITIES .......................................................... 61 CHAPTER 4 ......................................................................................................................................... 69 4.1. POLITICAL GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE ...................................................................................... 69 4.2. THE EXECUTIVE MAYORAL COMMITTEE ................................................................................... 71 4.3. ADMINISTRATIVE GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE ........................................................................... 72 4.4. MUNICIPAL WORKFORCE ......................................................................................................... 74 4.5. SKILLS DEVELOPMENT .............................................................................................................. 76 4.6. MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATIVE and INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY ................................................... 77 CHAPTER 5 ......................................................................................................................................... 80 5.1. LEGISLATION ............................................................................................................................ 80 5.2. BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 80 5.3. MECHANISMS AND PROCESSES ................................................................................................ 80 5.3.1. Ward Committees ............................................................................................................. 80 5.3.2. Public Engagements .......................................................................................................... 82 5.4. LEVELS OF INVOLVEMENT ........................................................................................................ 83 5.5. MUNICIPAL SECTORS ............................................................................................................... 85 5.6. STRUCTURED COMMUNITY CONSULTATIONS .......................................................................... 85 5.6.1. PREAMBLE ........................................................................................................................ 86 5.6.2. PURPOSE ........................................................................................................................... 86 5.6.3. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION MODEL, PRINCIPLES & APPROACH ................................................ 87 5.6.4. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCEDURES ............................................................................... 87 5.6.5. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION OPTIONS AND PROCEDURES ......................................................... 88 5.6.6. Comments via Electronic Mail ........................................................................................... 89 5.6.7. Ward committees ............................................................................................................. 89 5.8. INTER-GOVERNMENTAL ALIGNMENT and INVOLVEMENT ........................................................ 89 CHAPTER 6 ......................................................................................................................................... 92 6.1. FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE ...................................................................................................... 92 6.2. PERFORMANCE AGAINST IDP OBJECTIVES ................................................................................ 93 6.3. ALIGNMENT OF IDP STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES and BUDGET ........................................................ 98 6.3.1. Alignment of IDP Strategic Objectives and Budget (REVENUE) ........................................... 98 6.3.2. Alignment of IDP Strategic Objectives and Budget (OPERATING EXPENDITURE) ................. 99 6.3.3. Alignment of IDP Strategic Objectives and Budget (CAPITAL) ........................................... 100 6.4. INSTITUTIONAL PERFORMANCE ............................................................................................. 101 6.5. INSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES ................................................................................................. 107 2 | P a g e 6.6. BACK-to-BACICS ..................................................................................................................... 115 6.7. Municipal Turnaround Strategy (MTAS) ................................................................................. 115 6.8. Strategic Risk Assessment ...................................................................................................... 116 CHAPTER 7 ....................................................................................................................................... 118 7.1. WARD PLANNING and STAKEHOLDER INPUT .........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Call to Join the Verlorenvlei Coalition
    TUNGSTEN MINE THREATENS WAY OF LIFE OF THOUSANDS AND PLACES RAMSAR-SITE VERLORENVLEI AT HIGH RISK · We the people of the Verlorenvallei stand as one against a threat which could destroy our way of life and our valley. · We the farm workers, fishermen, farmers and entrepreneurs will not allow the pollution of our air, water or land or loss of our livelihoods for the sake of a greedy few. · We the lovers of nature reject further desecration of the already endangered Verlorenvlei and the unique and wide variety of animals, birds, reptiles and plants which have survived the depredations of humans. · We will protect the rare and largely unexplored rich pre-historical heritage for those who may follow us. · We have formed the Verlorenvlei Coalition; we are growing steadily, please join. The Verlorenvlei Coalition (VC) is a coalition of labour, business, civic organisations, environmental groups and local residents formed to preserve the integrity of the area and its people. We call our valley, which runs from Piketberg to Elands Bay, the Verlorenvallei. THE CHALLENGE: No less than 5 applicants have submitted applications to the DEPARTMENT OF MINING for the right to build an open-cast tungsten and molybdenum mine, one of these 50 hectares in extent and 200 metres deep, in the Moutonshoek Valley, between Piketberg and Elands Bay in the Western Cape. The Moutonshoek is a narrow valley, approximately 17 kilometres long and 3-4 kilometres wide, on the slopes of the Piketberg-mountain. THE VERLORENVLEI COALITION will oppose the proposed mining because: 1. It will destroy productive and profitable farms and detrimentally affect the food security of the Western Cape.
    [Show full text]
  • Cederberg-IDP May 2020 – Review 2020-2021
    THIRD REVIEW: 2020/2021 MAY 2020 SECTIONS REVISED THIRD REVISION TO THE FOURTH GENERATION IDP ................... 0 3.8. INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS ................................. 67 FOREWORD BY THE EXECUTIVE MAYOR.................................. 2 3.9. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICT) ...... 68 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FROM THE MUNICIPAL MANAGER AND IMPORTANT MESSAGE ABOUT COVID-19 ................................. 4 CHAPTER 4: STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES AND PROJECT ALIGNMENT .. 71 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................... 5 4.1 IMPROVE AND SUSTAIN BASIC SERVICE DELIVERY AND CHAPTER I: STATEMENT OF INTENT ...................................... 9 INFRASTRUCTURE .................................................... 73 1.1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................... 9 A. Water B. Electricity 1.2. THE FOURTH (4TH) GENERATION IDP .............................. 10 C. Sanitation D. Refuse removal / waste management 1.3. THE IDP AND AREA PLANS ........................................... 11 E. Roads F. Comprehensive Integrated Municipal Infrastructure Plan 1.4. POLICY AND LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT ................................ 11 G. Stormwater H. Integrated Infrastructure Asset Management Plan 1.5. STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK OF THE IDP .............................. 13 I. Municipal Infrastructure Growth Plan 1.6. VISION, MISSION, VALUES ............................................ 14 4.2 FINANCIAL VIABILITY AND ECONOMICALLY SUSTAINABILITY .... 87 1.7. STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Paleoenvironmental Reconstruction of the Elands Bay Area Using Carbon and Nitrogen Isotopes in Torotoise Bone
    A paleoenvironmental reconstruction of the Elands Bay area using carbon and nitrogen isotopes in tortoise bone. By Navashni Naidoo Supervised by Professor Judith Sealy Town Cape Dissertation submitted in fulfilmentof of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (MSc) in Archaeology In the Department of Archaeology University of Cape Town UniversityJuly 2017 i The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University of Cape Town Plagiarism Declaration I have used the Harvard convention for citation and referencing. Each contribution from, and quotation in, this thesis from the work(s) of other people has been attributed, and has been cited and referenced. This thesis is my own work. ii Abstract This study explores the utility of stable light isotopes in Chersina angulata (angulate or bowsprit tortoise) bone collagen as a paleoenvironmental proxy, to augment the limited range of proxies preserved in Southern Africa. δ13C and δ15N were measured in 76 archaeological tortoises from Elands Bay Cave and nearby Tortoise Cave. The samples range in age from the late Holocene to the terminal Pleistocene. δ15N values are not strongly correlated with δ13C, indicating different drivers of variation in the two isotopes. δ13C and δ15N values are lower between 154-487 cal. BP, which spans the Little Ice Age, compared with 744-1 042 cal.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Cape Biodiversity Spatial Plan Handbook 2017
    WESTERN CAPE BIODIVERSITY SPATIAL PLAN HANDBOOK Drafted by: CapeNature Scientific Services Land Use Team Jonkershoek, Stellenbosch 2017 Editor: Ruida Pool-Stanvliet Contributing Authors: Alana Duffell-Canham, Genevieve Pence, Rhett Smart i Western Cape Biodiversity Spatial Plan Handbook 2017 Citation: Pool-Stanvliet, R., Duffell-Canham, A., Pence, G. & Smart, R. 2017. The Western Cape Biodiversity Spatial Plan Handbook. Stellenbosch: CapeNature. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The compilation of the Biodiversity Spatial Plan and Handbook has been a collective effort of the Scientific Services Section of CapeNature. We acknowledge the assistance of Benjamin Walton, Colin Fordham, Jeanne Gouws, Antoinette Veldtman, Martine Jordaan, Andrew Turner, Coral Birss, Alexis Olds, Kevin Shaw and Garth Mortimer. CapeNature’s Conservation Planning Scientist, Genevieve Pence, is thanked for conducting the spatial analyses and compiling the Biodiversity Spatial Plan Map datasets, with assistance from Scientific Service’s GIS Team members: Therese Forsyth, Cher-Lynn Petersen, Riki de Villiers, and Sheila Henning. Invaluable assistance was also provided by Jason Pretorius at the Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning, and Andrew Skowno and Leslie Powrie at the South African National Biodiversity Institute. Patricia Holmes and Amalia Pugnalin at the City of Cape Town are thanked for advice regarding the inclusion of the BioNet. We are very grateful to the South African National Biodiversity Institute for providing funding support through the GEF5 Programme towards layout and printing costs of the Handbook. We would like to acknowledge the Mpumalanga Biodiversity Sector Plan Steering Committee, specifically Mervyn Lotter, for granting permission to use the Mpumalanga Biodiversity Sector Plan Handbook as a blueprint for the Western Cape Biodiversity Spatial Plan Handbook.
    [Show full text]
  • Lamberts Bay Area Plan 2017-2022
    LAMBERTS BAY AREA PLAN 2017-2022 1 MESSAGE FROM WARD COUNCILLOR South Africa as nation has held successful and peaceful local government elections on 03 August 2016. These elections were certified to have been free and fair to a large extent. This is clear demonstration of the growth of our young democracy. In accordance with the provisions of the laws that govern the affairs of the municipality, we have embarked upon a process of consultation with the local community with a view to present the IDP and Budget for the period 2017-2022. Chapter 4 of the Municipal Systems Act 32 of 2000 makes community participation in the affairs, programmes and activities of the municipality a legal obligation. The IDP is therefore the culmination of a lengthy process of consultation with the local community. Accordingly, this IDP carries the aspirations of the masses of our community which the 2017/18 Budget must seek to finance. Therefore, this IDP must be seen as a beacon of hope that will continue to guide us over the next financial year in our collective endeavours of building a better life for all our communities. Critical to this is the question of compliance with the laws of the Republic. For an example, before the end of May 2017 we must have presented to Council the final budget for the forthcoming financial year. In this regard, section 24 of the Municipal Finance Management Act 56 of 2003 prescribes that “the final budget must be tabled 30 days before the start of the new financial year. “We remain committed to the realization of the 5 National Key Performance Areas of municipalities, being the following: Good Governance and Public Participation Municipal Transformation and Organisational Development Basic Infrastructure and Service Delivery Local Economic Development Municipal Financial Viability and Management This IDP together with its projects and implementation focus relates strongly to the capital budget.
    [Show full text]
  • Hopefield Private Nature Reserve Management Plan – August 2019
    HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – AUGUST 2019 HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE PROTECTED AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN The acid sands of marine origins and the Malmesbury shales of the Swartland meet at Hopefield. Here, the interplay of soil types and water permeability of these substrates as well as the climatic influence of the nearby Atlantic Ocean leads to unique habitats and many seasonal wetlands. Thus, the area has many interesting endemic and threatened plant taxa and it is no surprise that Hopefield is now renowned for its annual flower show which is run by a passionate and knowledgeable group of local volunteers (Maree and Vromans 2010). AUGUST 2019 FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 1 HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – AUGUST 2019 Compiled by Charl du Plessis & Sean Ranger FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Porterville FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 2 HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – AUGUST 2019 AUTHORISATION The management authority assigned in terms of Section 38 (1) or (2) of the Act must, within 12 months of assignment submit a management plan of the Protected Area to the MEC for approval. Recommended and approved by the Municipal Manager, Saldanha Bay Municipality. Name Resolution Number Date Municipal Manager Saldanha Municipality ………………………. MEC Western Cape Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning Name Signature Date Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning Mr Anton Bredell PROVINCIAL MINISTER FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 3 HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – AUGUST 2019 i) Copyright and Disclaimer Copyright in this information vests with FOOTPRINT Environmental Services (FES) and the unauthorised copying thereof or making of extracts thereof is illegal.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Gis-Interpolation Techniques for Groundwater Evaluation: a Case Study of the Sandveld, Western Cape, South Africa
    ASSESSMENT OF GIS-INTERPOLATION TECHNIQUES FOR GROUNDWATER EVALUATION: A CASE STUDY OF THE SANDVELD, WESTERN CAPE, SOUTH AFRICA ZAHN MÜNCH Thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Natural Sciences at the University of Stellenbosch Supervisor: Prof H.L. Zietsman December 2004 AUTHOR’S DECLARATION I, the undersigned, hereby declare that the work contained in this thesis is my own original work and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it at any university for a degree. Signature: ___________________________________ Date: 25 November 2004 . ABSTRACT The Sandveld, a potato growing area of the Western Cape is subject to significant groundwater abstraction for both municipal and agriculture purposes. The climate is arid and sensitive and important ecosystems in the area are showing varying degrees of impact. Management measures are needed to ensure ongoing sustainable development of the area. In this study, different interpolation techniques were evaluated to calculate values for unsampled variables rainfall and groundwater elevation. Local deterministic techniques as well as geostatistical techniques were used. It was found that geostatistical techniques, especially with collateral information, such as topography, provided a more accurate result. For environmental studies of this nature, Kriging is recommended as interpolation technique. The underlying data will determine the selection of the particular type of Kriging. Data was extracted from a customized relational database, geoMon, used for data capture, retrieval, processing and reporting. Ease of data extraction facilitated analysis. The interpolated grids were applied in two scenarios: Recharge calculations and quantification as well as a new classification approach according to Resource Directed Measures (RDM).
    [Show full text]
  • Cs2016household QN Created By: Rabelani, 12/10/2015 06:38:51
    CS2016Household_QN Created by: rabelani, 12/10/2015 06:38:51 Chapters: 6 Groups: 14 Questions with conditions: 120 Questions: 225 CS2016Household_QN 1 STATISTICS ACT NO.6 OF 1999 (CONFIDENTIALITY) 17(1) Despite any other law, no return or other information collected by Statistics South Africa for the purposes of official or other statistics that relates to an individual or a household may be disclosed to any person. 17(3b) Any person who is involved in the collection of, or who may use, that information or data, must first take an oath of confidentiality. 18(1e) & 18(1g) An officer of Statistics South Africa who wilfully discloses any data or information obtained in the course of such employment to a person not authorised to receive that information is guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding R10 000, or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding 6 months or to both. 1.4 Enumeration Area Number EANo 1.5 Map reference number identifier MRN_ID 1.6 DU Number DUNo 1.7 Province Prov 1.8 Local municipality LocalMunic 1.9 Main place MainPlace 1.10 Sub-place SubPlace 1.11 Longitude and Latitude coordinates LongLat 2 PARTICULARS OF DWELLING UNIT 2.1 Location of the dwelling Location [v 2.1] 2.2 Physical identification of the dwelling unit PhysicalId 2.3 Total number of households in this dwelling unit TotalHHs [v 2.3] 2.4 Household number for this household HHNumber [c 2.4] [v 2.4] 3 PERSON INFORMATION 3.1 Date of interview InterviewDate / / 2 3.2 Name and surname of respondent RespoName 3.3 Contact number of respondent ContactNo [v 3.3] 3.4 How many people were present in this household on the reference night (midnight 06 to 07 March 2016)? A household is a group of persons who live together, and provide for themselves jointly with food or other essentials for living, or a single person who lives alone.
    [Show full text]
  • West Coast District
    Report No 4110 / 401286 Integrated Environmental Programme of the West Coast District June 2006 19 IN 3 2 D E D N N U U O O NINHAM SHAND F F CONSULTING SERVICES Report No: 4110/401286 INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMME OF THE WEST COAST DISTRICT June 2006 WESKUS DIS TRIKSMUNISIPALITEIT WEST COAST DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY 81 Church Street Posbus / P O Box 242 P.O. Box 1347 Moorreesburg Cape Town 7310 8000 Tel: (021) 481 2400 Tel: (022) 433 8400 Fax: (021) 424 5588 Fax : (022) 433 8484 Email: [email protected] [email protected] WEST COAST DISTRICT IEP Page i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS With grateful thanks for the time and contributions of the following: Title Name Surname Organisation Mrs Feroza Albertus DEAT Mr Trevor Bagus Saldanha Bay Municipality Mr Quintin Balie Swartland Municipality Dr Mandy Barnett CAPE Mr F Bekker CapeNature Mr Johan Bornman Namakwa Sands Mr A.J Bredenhann Berg River Municipality Mr Johan Bredenkamp Citrusdal WUA Mr Jan Briers Dept. of Mineral and Energy Affairs Mr Japie Buckle SANBI Sandveld Task Team/ Cape Nature/ Great Cederberg Mr Johan Burger Biodiversity Corridor Ms Elbé Cloete Cape Nature (Knersvlakte) & Bird Island Mr Marco Coetzee SANParks - West Coast National Park Mr Julian Conrad Mr Adriaan Conradie Dept of Agriculture Western Cape Mr Gary de Kock Cape West Coast Biosphere Reserve/ WCNP Mr Charl de Villiers Botanical Society of South Africa Mr Charl Du Plessis CapeNature Mr Mark Duckitt Cape West Coast Biosphere Reserve Mr Marius Durandt Dept of Agriculture Western Cape Mr Morris Florris CapeNature Mr JJ
    [Show full text]
  • Flower Route Map 2017
    K o n k i e p en w R31 Lö Narubis Vredeshoop Gawachub R360 Grünau Karasburg Rosh Pinah R360 Ariamsvlei R32 e N14 ng Ora N10 Upington N10 IAi-IAis/Richtersveld Transfrontier Park Augrabies N14 e g Keimoes Kuboes n a Oranjemund r Flower Hotlines O H a ib R359 Holgat Kakamas Alexander Bay Nababeep N14 Nature Reserve R358 Groblershoop N8 N8 Or a For up-to-date information on where to see the Vioolsdrif nge H R27 VIEWING TIPS best owers, please call: Eksteenfontein a r t e b e e Namakwa +27 (0)72 760 6019 N7 i s Pella t Lekkersing t Brak u Weskus +27 (0)63 724 6203 o N10 Pofadder S R383 R383 Aggeneys Flower Hour i R382 Kenhardt To view the owers at their best, choose the hottest Steinkopf R363 Port Nolloth N14 Marydale time of the day, which is from 11h00 to 15h00. It’s the s in extended ower power hour. Respect the ower Tu McDougall’s Bay paradise: Walk with care and don’t trample plants R358 unnecessarily. Please don’t pick any buds, bulbs or N10 specimens, nor disturb any sensitive dune areas. Concordia R361 R355 Nababeep Okiep DISTANCE TABLE Prieska Goegap Nature Reserve Sun Run fels Molyneux Buf R355 Springbok R27 The owers always face the sun. Try and drive towards Nature Reserve Grootmis R355 the sun to enjoy nature’s dazzling display. When viewing Kleinzee Naries i R357 i owers on foot, stand with the sun behind your back. R361 Copperton Certain owers don’t open when it’s overcast.
    [Show full text]
  • Cederberg Municipality Draft Idp (2012-2017)
    CEDERBERG MUNICIPALITY DRAFT IDP (2012-2017) 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 BACKGROUND AND PROCESS ................................................................................................................................................................ 6 1.1 BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 PROCESS FOLLOWED IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE DRAFT IDP .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 A. Preparation Phase........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 8 A.2 Scoping the Draft IDP process.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 8
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Tariffs & Dates
    N AMAKWA T OERE & A KKOMMODASIE (PTY) LTD 2020/895816/07 T / A N AMAQUA T OURS Sy nonymous with the panoramic Cede rberg Mountains, the breathtaking City Hall Caves which takes one on an imag inary excursion leading you to other dimensions, unspoilt West Coast beauty, a kaleido scope of Namaqualand flower splendour, hospitality, sumptuous meals, and the most luxurious bus transport. NAMAQUALAND FLOWER TOURS FOR 2021 Pay R2 000 p/p deposit (within 14 days) after your booking is confirmed, and balance of tour price 30 days before tour departs. 202 1 TARIFFS & DATES 4 DAY TOUR – SPECIAL TARIFF Sharing tariff (per person) R6 900 Single tariff (per person) R8 400 CPT 1/1 29 July – 1 August Thursday - Sunday CPT 1/ 5 17 - 2 0 September Friday - Monday 4 DAY FLOWER TOUR Sharing tariff (per person) R7 900 Single tariff (per person) R9 500 CPT 1/2 2 - 5 August Monday - Thursday CPT 1/3 6 - 9 August - F ULL Friday - Monday CPT 1/4 8 – 11 September - FULL Wednesday - Saturday 5 DA Y FLOWER TOUR Sharing tariff (per person) R10 000 Single tariff (per person) R12 000 CPT 2/1 10 - 14 August Tuesday - Saturday CPT 2/2 15 - 19 August Sunday - Thursday CPT 2/3 27 – 31 August - FULL Friday - Tuesday 12 – 16 September Sunday - Thursday C PT 2/ 4 6 DAY FLOWER TOUR Sharing tariff (per person) R 11 900 Single tariff (per person) R 13 700 CPT 3/1 21 – 26 August Saturday - Thursday CPT 3/2 1 – 6 September Wednesday - Monday 4 DAY WES TCOAST - C EDER BERG TO U R S Sharing & Single Tari ff (per person) R6 500 WKS 8/1 20 - 23 Jul y Tuesday - Friday WKS 8/2 25 - 28 July Sunday - Wednesday WKS 8/3 23 – 26 September Thursday - Sunday 4 DAY FLOWER TOUR Sharing tariff (per person) R7 900 Single tariff (per person) R9 500 CPT 1/2 2 - 5 August Monday - Thursday CPT 1/3 6 - 9 August - FULL Friday - Monday CPT 1/4 8 – 11 September - FULL Wednesday - Saturday 4 DAY FLOWER TOUR Included : 3 Nights ' accommodation at Namaqua Lodge / Registered tour guide / transport / Meals as indicated Excluded : Entrance fees ( maximum of R150 pp per tour), lunch, tips & drinks.
    [Show full text]