The Millions Spent on Closed Monuments

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

THE MILLIONS SPENT ON CLOSED MONUMENTS Non-Governmental Organization EC Ma Ndryshe February 2016 THE MILLIONS SPENT ON CLOSED MONUMENTS Non-Governmental Organization EC Ma Ndryshe February 2016 2 n EC MA NDRYSHE This report was prepared as part of the “EC for Transparent and Inclusive Cities” Project, made possible through funding provided by the Kosovo Foundation for Open Society. The content and positions expressed herein are those of the authors and EC Ma Ndryshe. Rr. Saraçët 5, 20000/Prizren Bulevardi Nënë Tereza, H 30 B1 Nr. 5, 10000/Prishtinë www.ecmandryshe.org [email protected] 038-224-967 029-222-771 THE MILLIONS SPENT ON CLOSED MONUMENTS n 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction 4 II. Prizren’s Closed Monuments 4 III. Monitoring Findings 6 Gazi Mehmed Pasha Hammam (Turkish Bath) 7 Hydro-Power Plant – Electrical Museum 8 Episcopal Church of St. George (Synod) 9 St. Friday Church 10 Archaeological Museum – Watch Tower (Shemsedin Ahmet Bey Hammam) 11 Museum of Mother Teresa 12 Old Municipal Building – Belediye 13 Shani Efendi Selamlik 14 House of Musa Shehzade 15 House of Shuaip Pasha (Spahiu) 16 Blacksmiths’ Street 17 IV. Conclusions 18 References 19 EC Ma Ndryshe 20 4 n EC MA NDRYSHE I. Introduction preserved monuments more accessible to a larger number of people. This is why there should be cooperation between About 3 million Euros have been spent within a short period heritage management and the tourism industry4. of time for the restoration of ten cultural heritage monuments in Prizren. Today, almost all of these monuments are closed Cultural heritage is of great value to different industries. to the public. In total, since the completion of restoration But the tourism sector is the industry that exploits cultural works, these monuments have remained closed from 300 to heritage to a greater extent in support of its main activities, 350 months. Consequently, they have generated 0 Euro from such as accommodation, transportation and gastronomy5. eventual economic activity. Moreover, only one of these ten monuments has a management plan. Millions spent for res- In this context, EC Ma Ndryshe took the initiative to analyze toration, from the Kosovo budget and international donors, the impacts and benefits of several million worth of inter- have produced closed monuments that are not putting an end ventions into monuments of cultural heritage in Prizren and to the cultural heritage degradation trend in the city. infrastructure in the Historic Centre. According to World Bank, international experiences have The results of this research are discouraging, due to the fact shown that cultural and natural heritage values can be- that the millions invested over the last decade in 10 mon- come a driver for Local Economic Development, when stra- uments of cultural heritage have produced only the reality tegic and coordinated efforts are undertaken by key local of doors closed to the local public and foreign visitors, with stakeholders, the local community and various levels of zero economic impact for the city and almost no tangible government to manage, develop and promote these values benefits for the community. in concert and in a durable fashion1. Another World Bank publication finds that heritage asset management can offer a range of benefits, that are numer- II. Prizren’s Closed Monuments ous, distinct and growing2. Broadly, they can be divided into EC Ma Ndryshe has collected data on restoration and con- major economic and non-economic impacts. The economic servation interventions in the following monuments of cul- impacts are: positive effects in reducing poverty, increased tural heritage: employment, increases in income from the culture and ser- vices industries, etc. Whereas the non-economic effects are: Gazi Mehmed Pasha Hammam (Turkish Bath) effects beneficial to the levels of education and of identi- ty fostering, social cohesion, inclusion and social capital Hydro-Power Plant – Electrical Museum development, then the continued development of cultural heritage at the national level, as well as sustainable conser- Episcopal Church of St. George (Synod) vation and the passing of heritage to future generations. And both sets of benefits or impacts are very important3. St. Friday Church Researchers have pointed out that “conservation” and “man- Archaeological Museum – Watch Tower (Shemsedin agement” of cultural heritage monuments must be comple- Ahmet Bey Hammam) mentary. Therefore, conservation is an essential premise for Museum of Mother Teresa the good management of cultural heritage, but manage- ment creates additional values and goes beyond making the Old Municipal Building – Belediye 1 World Bank, Cultural Heritage and Local Economic Development: Good Shani Efendi Selamlik Practice from the Western Balkans, at: http://www-wds.worldbank.org/ external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2012/06/01/000426104_2 House of Musa Shehzade 0120601141153/Rendered/PDF/690900WP0P10910Final0Synthesis0Note. pdf, accessed on January 16, 2016 2 World Bank, Cultural Heritage and Development - A Framework for Action in 4 Ibid the Middle East and North Africa, at: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/ bitstream/handle/10986/13908/225590REPLACEM1ccession0A2003100110. 5 Directorate for Cultural Heritage, Norway, Cultural Heritage Monuments pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y, accessed on January 14, 2016 and Historic buildings as value generators in a post-industrial economy”, at: http://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/175613/nypan_ 3 Ibid cultural_heritage.pdf?sequence=1, accessed on January 15, 2016 THE MILLIONS SPENT ON CLOSED MONUMENTS n 5 House of Shuaip Pasha (Spahiu) toration project was developed by the Regional Center for Cultural Heritage in Prizren and Cultural Heritage without Apart from these, there was also data collected for the revi- Borders. The restoration works began in 2012 and were con- talization project of the Blacksmiths’ Street. cluded in 2013. Planning had provided that upon completion of restoration works, the building would resume the function In the last decade, the international community, Govern- of the Electrical Museum. In the interim a study workshop ment of Kosovo and Municipality of Prizren, have spent was also arranged within the facility. However, to date, the close to 3 million Euros in restoration/conservation proj- Electrical Museum has rarely opened its doors for activities, ects on these monuments. let alone daily operations. Monitoring activities in these monuments have concluded that the majority of them are closed to the public, or are not being used for the purpose intended by the funds al- Churches, for Clergy and Believers Only located for interventions. Speaking in numbers, the doors of these monuments have been closed for a total of 300 Church of St. George and St. Friday Church were restored to 350 months. from 2005/06 to 2010 and 2014, respectively, intermittently. Both serve the needs of the Orthodox clergy, believers and The amount of funds generated by eventual economic ac- pilgrims. The general public or tourists wanting to visit must tivity in these monuments to date is 0 Euros, whereas only obtain permission from the religious leaders of the Orthodox one of them has a management plan, namely the Gazi Church. In most cases, the requests are denied. Mehmed Pasha Hammam. Two Monuments, One Guard Only Restoration with Insufficient Funding The Archaeological Museum of Prizren – Watch Tower was In the case of the Hammam of Prizren, restoration works had recently restored with funding by the US Embassy in Pristina, begun with scarce resources. An estimate by the Regional while years ago funds had also been allocated by MCYS. Center for Cultural Heritage in Prizren had established that Although this dual monument has been restored and has the amount needed for intervention is over 670 thousand Eu- almost everything for regular operation, it is nevertheless ros. For the first phase of these works UNESCO had allocat- closed to the public. Concurrently, there was no institutional ed 214 thousand USD. It was therefore decided that the first leadership for several months, and no staff to care for daily phase interventions would focus on the domes to eliminate activities. The only person employed at this monument is the risk of humidity damage and further degradation of the the security officer. Hammam. However, UNESCO funds were insufficient for the completion of the first phase. Due to the lack of 50 thousand Euros, the works were interrupted in September 2014. Mean- time, in February 2015, the lead sheeting from the roof of the An Example of the “Sacrifice” of Funds Hammam was stolen twice, thus risking repeated damage to the monument due to wet conditions and further degrada- The Museum of Mother Teresa is a project contracted five tion. The Hammam is the only monument with a manage- years ago by the Ministry of Culture, Youth and Sports. This ment plan, yet it does not operate year-round. Exceptional- museum is not yet operational, although according to of- ly, for cultural events, the doors of the Hammam open for ficial reports works were completed in 2012. Mid last year short periods of time. the facility passed technical inspection, but to this day the Museum doors remain closed. Museum of Inactivity “Regional Center” of the Department of Tourism Hydro-Power Plant – Electrical Museum has been restored thanks to funding by the US Embassy in Pristina. The res- Old Municipal Building – Belediye was restored in 2010- 2011, thanks to donations by the European Union Office in 6 n EC MA NDRYSHE Kosovo, with the purpose of being the first Regional Center being maintained and that there is degradation. for Cultural Heritage in the Balkans. However, this facili- ty houses the Department of Tourism of the Municipality of Prizren for several years now. Deviation in Forging Blacksmiths’ Street is a project implemented by the Munici- Double Fraud pality of Prizren and UN Habitat. The works were completed in 2011. The street was revitalized in an effort to link the The Shani Efendi Selamlik was restored thanks to support Historic Center with some important monuments of cultural provided by the US Embassy Conservation Fund.
Recommended publications
  • Community Rights Assessment Report Fourth Edition

    Community Rights Assessment Report Fourth Edition

    COMMUNITY RIGHTS ASSESSMENT REPORT FOURTH EDITION NOVEMBER, 2015 Cover photograph: OSCE/Šehida Miftari, March 2015 Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe MISSION IN KOSOVO Community Rights Assessment Report Fourth Edition November, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 5 1. INTER-COMMUNITY DIALOGUE ..................................................................................................... 6 Inter-ethnic dialogue and dealing with the past ................................................................................ 6 Education and dialogue ...................................................................................................................... 7 2. SECURITY AND JUSTICE SYSTEM ..................................................................................................... 9 Security trends and responses ............................................................................................................ 9 Rule of Law ....................................................................................................................................... 11 Property rights and reduction of backlog ......................................................................................... 13 Access to Justice ..............................................................................................................................
  • UNDER ORDERS: War Crimes in Kosovo Order Online

    UNDER ORDERS: War Crimes in Kosovo Order Online

    UNDER ORDERS: War Crimes in Kosovo Order online Table of Contents Acknowledgments Introduction Glossary 1. Executive Summary The 1999 Offensive The Chain of Command The War Crimes Tribunal Abuses by the KLA Role of the International Community 2. Background Introduction Brief History of the Kosovo Conflict Kosovo in the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Kosovo in the 1990s The 1998 Armed Conflict Conclusion 3. Forces of the Conflict Forces of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Yugoslav Army Serbian Ministry of Internal Affairs Paramilitaries Chain of Command and Superior Responsibility Stucture and Strategy of the KLA Appendix: Post-War Promotions of Serbian Police and Yugoslav Army Members 4. march–june 1999: An Overview The Geography of Abuses The Killings Death Toll,the Missing and Body Removal Targeted Killings Rape and Sexual Assault Forced Expulsions Arbitrary Arrests and Detentions Destruction of Civilian Property and Mosques Contamination of Water Wells Robbery and Extortion Detentions and Compulsory Labor 1 Human Shields Landmines 5. Drenica Region Izbica Rezala Poklek Staro Cikatovo The April 30 Offensive Vrbovac Stutica Baks The Cirez Mosque The Shavarina Mine Detention and Interrogation in Glogovac Detention and Compusory Labor Glogovac Town Killing of Civilians Detention and Abuse Forced Expulsion 6. Djakovica Municipality Djakovica City Phase One—March 24 to April 2 Phase Two—March 7 to March 13 The Withdrawal Meja Motives: Five Policeman Killed Perpetrators Korenica 7. Istok Municipality Dubrava Prison The Prison The NATO Bombing The Massacre The Exhumations Perpetrators 8. Lipljan Municipality Slovinje Perpetrators 9. Orahovac Municipality Pusto Selo 10. Pec Municipality Pec City The “Cleansing” Looting and Burning A Final Killing Rape Cuska Background The Killings The Attacks in Pavljan and Zahac The Perpetrators Ljubenic 11.
  • Mapping of Early Childhood Development Services in Kosovo with Focus on Four Selected Municipalities: Gjakove, Gjilan, Lipjan and Dragash

    Mapping of Early Childhood Development Services in Kosovo with Focus on Four Selected Municipalities: Gjakove, Gjilan, Lipjan and Dragash

    Mapping of Early Childhood Development services in Kosovo with focus on four selected municipalities: Gjakove, Gjilan, Lipjan and Dragash December 2020 Mapping of Early Childhood Development services in Kosovo* with focus on four selected municipalities: Gjakove, Gjilan, Lipjan and Dragash *All references to Kosovo shall be understood under UNSCR 1244 December 2020 1 The report is developed by Vigan Behluli (lead author). The contents and recommendations of this report do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the United Nations Children’s Fund, UNICEF. ContentsContents Acronyms ...................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 5 Scope of work .............................................................................................................. 6 Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 7 Executive summary ......................................................................................................... 9 Policy and legal framework ......................................................................................... 15 Institutional service provision .................................................................................... 21 Country overview ....................................................................................................
  • Municipal Development Plan Dragash

    Municipal Development Plan Dragash

    United Nations Development Programme Conservation of Biodiversity and Sustainable Land Use Management in Dragash/Dragaš Municipal Development Plan for the Municipality of Dragash/Dragaš 2013 - 2023 1 Dragash / Dragaš, Kosovo August 2013 Contents Contents ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................................................ 3 List of Tables .............................................................................................................................................................................. 3 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Project Background ................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Purpose of the MDP ................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Public Consultation ..................................................................................................................................................................
  • (A): REHABILITATION of RADONIQI IRRIGATION SCHEME

    (A): REHABILITATION of RADONIQI IRRIGATION SCHEME

    Agriculture and Rural Development Project (ARDP) ESIA for Rehabilitation of Radoniqi-Dukagjini Irrigation Scheme ENVIROMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT Public Disclosure Authorized ASSESSMENT (ESIA) FOR THE SUB- COMPONENT 3 (a): REHABILITATION OF RADONIQI IRRIGATION SCHEME Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Prishtina, 03.12.2019 Public Disclosure Authorized Agriculture and Rural Development Project (ARDP) ESIA for Rehabilitation of Radoniqi-Dukagjini Irrigation Scheme Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Project objectives ................................................................................................................................ 8 1.2 Project scope ....................................................................................................................................... 8 2. BACKGROUND INFORMATON AND PROJECT CONTEXT ....................................................................... 9 3. LEGAL AND POLICY REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ESIA ............................................................................ 10 3.1 National Legislation of Relevance for the ESIA ................................................................................. 10 3.2 ESIA Procedure and Permitting ......................................................................................................... 13 3.3 Land Acquisition / Expropriation .....................................................................................................
  • Municipal Language Compliance in Kosovo JUNE 2014

    Municipal Language Compliance in Kosovo JUNE 2014

    Municipal language compliance in Kosovo JUNE 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 4 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 5 2. LEGAL AND POLICY FRAMEWORK ................................................................................. 6 3. FUNCTIONING OF THE OFFICE OF THE LANGUAGE COMMISSIONER AND THE LANGUAGE POLICY NETWORK .......................................................................................... 8 4. MUNICIPAL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE LAW ON THE USE OF LANGUAGES .............. 10 4.1. Adoption of municipal regulations for the recognition and use of languages at the municipal level and awareness raising activities ................................................... 10 4.2. Display of municipal signs, notices and bulletin boards ....................................... 12 4.3. Multilingual provision of services ......................................................................... 14 4.4. Interpretation during meetings of representative and executive bodies, and translation of municipal meeting documents and municipal legal acts ...................... 17 4.5. Translation of municipal websites and job vacancies ........................................... 19 4.6. Availability of interpretation and capacity of municipal translation units ........... 20 4.7. Displaying of multilingual street names and road signs ......................................
  • Water Supply

    Water Supply

    Rural Water and Sanitation Support Programme Kosovo, Phase IV Coverage Study and Assessment of Water Supply and Sanitation Systems in Kosovo Assessment of with water supply and sanitation coverage in Kosovo Financial and technical assessment of independent non-RWC managed rural water supply systems Volume I – Report CDI, 19.01.2012 RWSSP IV – Coverage Study and Assessment of Water and Sanitation Systems in Kosovo Table of contents (Volume I – Report) 1 Summary........................................................................................................................ 6 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 8 3 Coverage with water supply and sanitation in Kosovo ...................................................10 4 Technical status and investment needs of rural water systems .....................................17 4.1 Classification of water supply systems in Kosovo...................................................17 Technical status and investment needs operational systems not managed by RWC ........25 4.2 Technical status and investment needs of non-operational systems ......................27 4.3 Locations without water systems ............................................................................28 5 Methodology and definitions..........................................................................................30 5.1 Methodology...........................................................................................................30
  • Dragas/Dragash

    Dragas/Dragash

    Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe MISSION IN KOSOVO Democratisation Municipal Profile: Dragas/Dragash 29 March 2000 Leposavic Leposaviq Kosovska Mitrovica Zvecan Mitrovice Zubin Potok Zvecan Zubin Potok Podujevo Podujeve Vucitrn Istok Vushtrri Istog Srbica Skenderaj Obilic Pristina Pec Obiliq Prishtine Peje Glogovac Kosovska Klina Kosovo Polje Gllogoc Novo Brdo Kamenica Kline Fushe Kosove Novo Berde Kamenica Decani Lipljan Decan Lipjan Orahovac Stimlje Gnjilane Rahovec Shtime Gjilani Djakovica Gjakove Suva Reka Urosevac Suhareke Ferizaj Vitina Viti Strpce Kacanik Shterpce Kacaniku Prizren Prizren GORA DRAGASHI Map of Kosovo, produced by the HCIC GIS Unit March 2000. Boundaries or place names do not imply official recognition by UNMIK or the OSCE. Table of Contents 1. Introduction..........................................................................................................3 Table 1.1: Ethnic Composition, Including IDPs.............................................................................. 3 2. Civil Administration ............................................................................................4 Table 2.1: UN-Appointed Municipal Council ................................................................................. 4 Table 2.2: UN-Appointed Municipal Administrative Board ............................................................ 4 3. Political Parties.....................................................................................................5 Table 3.1: Political Parties ............................................................................................................
  • Kosovo 2020 Human Rights Report

    Kosovo 2020 Human Rights Report

    KOSOVO 2020 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Kosovo is a parliamentary democracy. The constitution and laws provide for an elected unicameral parliament (the Assembly), which in turn elects a president, whose choice of prime minister must be approved by the Assembly. Parliamentary elections were last held in October 2019 in a process generally considered free and fair, although European Union election observers noted that misuse of public resources and a lack of transparency of campaign finances resulted in an uneven playing field throughout the country. The Assembly was constituted in December 2019 with Albin Kurti confirmed as prime minister in February. After a no- confidence vote unseated Kurti’s government in March, Avdullah Hoti became prime minister on June 3 in a reconstituted government. Security forces include the Kosovo Police and the Kosovo Security Force, which respectively report to the Ministry of Interior and Ministry of Defense. The government continued the process of gradually transitioning the Kosovo Security Force into a territorial defense force in accordance with a 10-year plan which began in 2019. The Border Police, a subgroup of the Kosovo Police, are responsible for security at the border. Police maintain internal security, with the European Union rule-of-law mission in the country as a second responder for incidents of unrest. The NATO-led Kosovo Force, an international peacekeeping force, is a third responder. NATO’s Kosovo Force is responsible for providing a safe and secure environment and ensuring freedom of movement for all citizens. As of August, NATO’s Kosovo Force mission had approximately 3,400 troops from 27 countries.
  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 6.10.2020 SWD(2020) 356 Final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Kosovo* 2020 Report Accompany

    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 6.10.2020 SWD(2020) 356 Final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Kosovo* 2020 Report Accompany

    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 6.10.2020 SWD(2020) 356 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Kosovo* 2020 Report Accompanying the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions 2020 Communication on EU Enlargement Policy {COM(2020) 660 final} - {SWD(2020) 350 final} - {SWD(2020) 351 final} - {SWD(2020) 352 final} - {SWD(2020) 353 final} - {SWD(2020) 354 final} - {SWD(2020) 355 final} *This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSCR 1244(1999) and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo declaration of independence. EN EN Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 3 1.1. Context ......................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Summary of the report ................................................................................................. 4 2. FUNDAMENTALS FIRST: POLITICAL CRITERIA AND THE RULE OF LAW ............................ 7 2.1 Functioning of democratic institutions and public administration reform ................... 7 2.2.1 Democracy ................................................................................................................... 7 2.1.2 Public administration reform ...................................................................................... 13 2.2 Rule of law and fundamental rights
  • Turkish Community

    Turkish Community

    COMMUNITY PROFILES: TURKISH COMMUNITY 1. POPULATION SIZE AND LOCATION Based on the 2011 Kosovo census results, supplemented with OSCE data for northern Kosovo, ECMI Kosovo estimates that there are around 18,948 Turks living in Kosovo, making up about 1.01% of the total population. There is one municipality, Mamuşa/Mamushë/Mamuša, wherethe Turkish community is the numerical majority. However, the largest numbers of Turks reside in the Prizren municipality. The Prishtinë/Priština municipality also has a considerable Turkish population. Smaller Turkish communities can be found throughout the rest of Kosovo. Turkish community in Kosovo according to the 2011 Census* Municipality PercentaGe Number of community members Prizren 5.06% 9,091 Mamuşa/Mamushë/Mamuša 92.35% 5,128 Prishtinë/Priština 1.08% 2,156 Gjilan/Gnjilane 1.03% 978 Mitrovicë/Mitovica South 0.72% 518 Vushtrri/Vučitrn 0.38% 278 Mitrovicë/Mitovica North 0.71% 210 DraGash/DraGaš 0.6% 202 Lipjan/Lipljan 0.22% 128 FushëKosovë/Kosovo Polje 0.17% 62 Pejë/Peć 0.06% 59 Ferizaj/Uroševac 0.05% 55 Gjakovë/Ðakovica 0.02% 16 Gračanica/Graçanicë 0.06% 15 IstoG/Istok 0.02% 10 Novo Brdo/Novobërdë 0.07% 7 GlloGovc/GloGovac 0.01% 5 Kamenicë/Kamenica 0.01% 5 Podujevë/Podujevo 0.01% 5 Suharekë/Suva Reka 0.01% 4 Viti/Vitina 0.01% 4 Klinë/Klina 0.01% 3 Kaçanik/Kačanik 0.01% 2 Obiliq/Obilić 0.01% 2 Rahovec/Orahovac <0.01% 2 Skenderaj/Srbica <0.01% 1 Shtime/Štimlje <0.01% 1 Kllokot/Klokot 0.02% 1 Total 1.01% 18,948 * The 2011 Kosovo census did not cover northern Kosovo.
  • Assessment of the Situation of Ethnic Minorities in Kosovo (Period Covering June Through September 2000)

    Assessment of the Situation of Ethnic Minorities in Kosovo (Period Covering June Through September 2000)

    UNHCR Assessment of the Situation of Ethnic Minorities in Kosovo (period covering June through September 2000) Executive summary In this sixth joint report we aim to give an overview of the current situation faced by minority communities in Kosovo; describing the security issues affecting minorities; and illustrating the cumulative effect of the continued lack of security for the well being of these communities.1 Recalling the contents of previous reports, we have attempted to focus on policy issues. The challenges grow more complex, but it remains the responsibility of the international community, in particular UNMIK and KFOR, but, also, and most importantly, of all Kosovars to address them. We describe where improvements have taken place and outline those steps that are still needed to ensure the full protection of minority populations, permitting them to play a full and active role in the development of the future of Kosovo. Only once this is achieved will it be possible for existing minority communities to remain, confident of a viable future, and for the tens of thousands of refugees and displaced to return in safety and in dignity. The Ad Hoc Task Force on Minorities, jointly chaired by UNHCR and OSCE, has continued to be a forum for discussing and assessing a broad range of issues of concern to minorities. During recent months, the Task Force has undertaken a systematic review of a number of major problems. This work has contributed to the preparation of this report. The main input however, continues to be, constant feedback from the field presence of both organisations.