Technical Appendix

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Technical Appendix Technical Appendix A number of theoretical claims made in Chap. 3 are derived here. The differ- ence between rocket physics and rocket engineering is that the physics calcu- lations are tractable—we can proceed quite a long way down the road to understanding with some high school or undergraduate physics and mathe- matics. The level of physics and math required to make sense of the calcula- tions to follow is higher than that required for the main text, but not by much—you don’t need to be a rocket scientist. If this is your cup of tea, read on; our derivations are condensed to save space, but can be readily unpacked by that mythical creature dubbed by teachers “the interested student”. Engineering calculations are much harder and involve considerable numerical simulation; we won’t attempt any of those. Tsiolkovsky equation From momentum conservation we can say that, for a rocket of mass M (including propellant), where dv is a small change in rocket speed, and u is the speed of a mass dM of exhaust gas: M dv = −u dM (the minus sign is there because rocket mass decreases as fuel is ejected.) Differentiating this equation with respect to time yields the relevant forces: dv dM M =−Fuext (A1.1) dt dt © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 259 M. Denny, A. McFadzean, Rocket Science, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28080-2 260 Technical Appendix We have allowed for some external forces here, such as gravity and aerody- namic drag. In the absence of such forces, the rocket acceleration is due to thrust from ejected propellant (2nd term on right). Integration leads to M t ∆vt()≡ vt()−=vuln 0 + dtF (A1.2) 0 Mt() ∫ ext 0 The left side is the famous delta-v. M0 is the initial mass of the rocket, con- sisting of rocket shell mass Ms plus propellant mass Mp plus payload mass m, so that M0 = Ms+Mp+m. The rocket mass at time t = 0 is M0; once all the propellant is burned then the mass is M(τ) = Ms+m, where τ is the burn time. It is common practice to define the rocket mass fraction taken up by propellant: M ε ≡ p (A1.3) M 0 In terms of mass fraction, the total delta-v is given by ∆vuτ =− ln 1−ε (A1.4) () () in the absence of external forces. Equation (A1.4) is the Tsiolkovsky equation.1 If the rocket starts from rest, then its mass is the following exponential function of speed, found by integrating Eq. (A1.2) assuming zero external force, and solving for M: v Mv()=−M0 exp. (A1.5) u The plot shown in Fig. 3.3a in the main text is M(v) obtained from Eq. (A1.5). Figure 3.3b is obtained by plotting v(t) from Eq. (A1.2), again assum- ing that Fext = 0 and also that the mass decreases at a constant rate: M(t) = M0 − μt. The constant mass flow rate (a reasonable approximation, 1 There are many derivations and descriptions of the Tsiolkovsky rocket equation online. See for example www.real-world-physics-problems.com/rocket-physics.html, www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/ rockth.html, and https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsiolkovsky_rocket_equation. For more on Tsiolkovsky than we provided in Chap. 2 see the Wikipedia article Konstantin Tsiolkovsky, and Andrews (2009). Technical Appendix 261 commonly made in rocketry calculations) is related to other rocket parame- ters via μτ = Mp = ϵM0. In fact there is an extra term that should be added to the right side of Eq. (A1.1). We have derived the rocket thrust as T = udM/dt (it is the same mag- nitude but of opposite sign to the force exerted by the exhaust gas, in Eq. (A1.1)—this is N3 in action). Our derivation is based on momentum flow, but for real rockets there is an extra term due to pressure, so that dM Tu=+()PPea− Ae (A1.6) dt where Pe is the pressure of the exhaust gases at the nozzle exit, Ae is the area of the nozzle exit, and Pa is ambient atmospheric pressure. In practice the pres- sure contribution to thrust is usually negligible, except for large rockets at low altitudes. We note that in the technical literature you will find the curious statement that delta-v is not necessarily the actual change in speed of the rocket, even for motion along a straight line. This is true because many authors absorb the effects of external forces and/or the pressure term into the definition of delta-v (i.e. they move the integral on the right side of Eq. (A1.2) to the other side of the equation). Strictly speaking, delta-v is the true change in rocket speed only if all three of the following conditions apply: • There are no external forces, • Propellant is expelled in the opposite direction to the direction of travel, • Exhaust gas speed u is constant. Finally, for our nerdier readers, we note a subtle technicality of classical mechanics that has led to confusion and error even among professional physi- cists. Newton’s Second Law (N2) applies only to fixed mass systems, not to variable mass systems. If we tried to apply N2 directly we would obtain for the rocket thrust T = d(Mv)/dt = (dM/dt)v + M(dv/dt), which is (wrong and) not compatible with equation (A1.1) because the exhaust speed is not present. The modification of N2 to account properly for variable mass was sorted out, interestingly, over exactly the period that Tsiolkovsky developed the rocket equation (1897–1903) by a fellow Russian I.V. Meshchersky.2 2 Eke (1998), p3. 262 Technical Appendix Drag The force due to aerodynamic drag, i.e. the force that opposes the motion of a body through the air, is 1 2 FCdd= ρ Av (A2.1) 2 where v is the speed of the body through the air, A is its cross-sectional area, and ρ is the air density. Cd is the dimensionless drag coefficient; it is a slowly varying (for the most part) function of a fluid dynamic parameter called the Reynold’s number. Fluid dynamics is very complicated, and we don’t want or need to get into it too much; suffice it to say that the drag coefficient captures all the fluid dynamics of a body as it passes through the air, and that drag coefficient is usually pretty much constant for large values of Reynold’s num- ber, which is the case for our rockets. If we can regard Cd as constant, then the drag force acting on a rocket is seen to be a constant (let us define it as b = ½ ρCdA; it will differ from rocket to rocket) multiplied by the square of rocket speed.3 If the rate at which propellant is expelled from the rocket is a constant μ and if drag is the only external force acting on a rocket,4 then Eq. (A1.1) becomes dv 2 ()Mt0 − µµ=−bv + u . (A2.2) dt Note that there is an equilibrium (terminal) speed c for which no force acts on the rocket: the rocket increases in speed until it reaches uµ c = (A2.3) b 3 A detailed discussion of drag can be found in any fluid dynamics textbook (as well as in many online sources). See e.g. Massey (1997) Chapter 8 For a shorter discussion, see Denny (2011) pp197-200. In the context of the rocket equation, see Denny (2011) pp203-4. 4 This circumstance covers missiles in horizontal flight, for example. If the rocket is moving vertically upward then the force of gravity must also be included, but can be neglected for small model rockets which have very large initial accelerations, so this calculation applies approximately to that case as well. Technical Appendix 263 and then it can go no faster, unless the air thins, or the rocket becomes smaller by dropping a stage, or some other reason for reducing b. This equation inte- grates to give us the speed of the rocket as a function of time: 2uc/ 11−−()ε t /τ vt()= 2uc/ c. (A2.4) 11+−ε t /τ () We can express the rocket mass in terms of speed by eliminating the vari- able t to obtain: cu/2 cv− Mv()= M0 . (A2.5) cv+ Figures 3.4a, b are plotted from Eqs. (A2.4) and (A2.5) respectively. (For the section of Fig. (3.4a) corresponding to t > τ we obtained the curve by integrating Eq. (A2.2) with μ = 0 and with M0 replaced by (1−ε)M0.) Efficiency As with much of rocketry, the physics of rocket engine efficiency is simple enough whereas the engineering is complicated. Here we will stick mostly to calculating the physical propulsive power efficiency,η p. This measure of effi- ciency is defined as the ratio of propulsive power to the rate of production of propulsive kinetic energy. In other words, it is the fraction of power generated by the propellant that is converted into rocket power: Fv η = (A3.1) p 1 dM 1 dM u22+ v 2 dt 2 dt We know from Eq. (A1.1) that the magnitude of the thrust is F = (dM/dt)u and so 2vu/ η p = 2 . (A3.2) 1+ vu/ () 264 Technical Appendix Equation (A3.2) is plotted in Fig. 3.5. This expression for propulsive effi- ciency is the common one5—let us here go off the rails a little by defining another measure of propulsion efficiency based on energy: for a rocket with negligible shell mass (that is, Ms is small so that M0 ≈ Mp + m) the mechanical efficiency might be defined as payload kinetic energy divided by the sum of payload and propellant kinetic energy: 1 2 mv vv2 exp/()− u η ≡ 2 = .
Recommended publications
  • Astrodynamics
    Politecnico di Torino SEEDS SpacE Exploration and Development Systems Astrodynamics II Edition 2006 - 07 - Ver. 2.0.1 Author: Guido Colasurdo Dipartimento di Energetica Teacher: Giulio Avanzini Dipartimento di Ingegneria Aeronautica e Spaziale e-mail: [email protected] Contents 1 Two–Body Orbital Mechanics 1 1.1 BirthofAstrodynamics: Kepler’sLaws. ......... 1 1.2 Newton’sLawsofMotion ............................ ... 2 1.3 Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitation . ......... 3 1.4 The n–BodyProblem ................................. 4 1.5 Equation of Motion in the Two-Body Problem . ....... 5 1.6 PotentialEnergy ................................. ... 6 1.7 ConstantsoftheMotion . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... 7 1.8 TrajectoryEquation .............................. .... 8 1.9 ConicSections ................................... 8 1.10 Relating Energy and Semi-major Axis . ........ 9 2 Two-Dimensional Analysis of Motion 11 2.1 ReferenceFrames................................. 11 2.2 Velocity and acceleration components . ......... 12 2.3 First-Order Scalar Equations of Motion . ......... 12 2.4 PerifocalReferenceFrame . ...... 13 2.5 FlightPathAngle ................................. 14 2.6 EllipticalOrbits................................ ..... 15 2.6.1 Geometry of an Elliptical Orbit . ..... 15 2.6.2 Period of an Elliptical Orbit . ..... 16 2.7 Time–of–Flight on the Elliptical Orbit . .......... 16 2.8 Extensiontohyperbolaandparabola. ........ 18 2.9 Circular and Escape Velocity, Hyperbolic Excess Speed . .............. 18 2.10 CosmicVelocities
    [Show full text]
  • Mission to Jupiter
    This book attempts to convey the creativity, Project A History of the Galileo Jupiter: To Mission The Galileo mission to Jupiter explored leadership, and vision that were necessary for the an exciting new frontier, had a major impact mission’s success. It is a book about dedicated people on planetary science, and provided invaluable and their scientific and engineering achievements. lessons for the design of spacecraft. This The Galileo mission faced many significant problems. mission amassed so many scientific firsts and Some of the most brilliant accomplishments and key discoveries that it can truly be called one of “work-arounds” of the Galileo staff occurred the most impressive feats of exploration of the precisely when these challenges arose. Throughout 20th century. In the words of John Casani, the the mission, engineers and scientists found ways to original project manager of the mission, “Galileo keep the spacecraft operational from a distance of was a way of demonstrating . just what U.S. nearly half a billion miles, enabling one of the most technology was capable of doing.” An engineer impressive voyages of scientific discovery. on the Galileo team expressed more personal * * * * * sentiments when she said, “I had never been a Michael Meltzer is an environmental part of something with such great scope . To scientist who has been writing about science know that the whole world was watching and and technology for nearly 30 years. His books hoping with us that this would work. We were and articles have investigated topics that include doing something for all mankind.” designing solar houses, preventing pollution in When Galileo lifted off from Kennedy electroplating shops, catching salmon with sonar and Space Center on 18 October 1989, it began an radar, and developing a sensor for examining Space interplanetary voyage that took it to Venus, to Michael Meltzer Michael Shuttle engines.
    [Show full text]
  • Nasa Tm X-1864 *
    NASA TECHNICAL. • £HP2fKit NASA TM X-1864 * ... MEMORANDUM oo fe *' > ;ff f- •* '• . ;.*• f PROPULSION • FOR *MANN1D E30PLORATION-k '* *Of THE SOEAE " • » £ Moedkel • - " *' ' ' y Lem$ Research Center Cleveland, Qbt® NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SFACE ADMINISTRATION • WASHINGTON, D. €, * AUCUST 1969 NASA TM X-1864 PROPULSION SYSTEMS FOR MANNED EXPLORATION OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM By W. E. Moeckel Lewis Research Center Cleveland, Ohio NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION For sale by the Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and. Technical Information Springfield, Virginia 22151 - CFSTI price $3.00 ABSTRACT What propulsion systems are in sight for fast interplanetary travel? Only a few show promise of reducing trip times to values comparable to those of 16th century terrestrial expeditions. The first portion of this report relates planetary round-trip times to the performance parameters of two types of propulsion systems: type I is specific-impulse limited (with high thrust), and type n is specific-mass limited (with low thrust). The second part of the report discusses advanced propulsion concepts of both types and evaluates their limitations. The discussion includes nuclear-fission . rockets (solid, liquid, and gaseous core), nuclear-pulse propulsion, nuclear-electric rockets, and thermonuclear-fusion rockets. Particular attention is given to the last of these, because it is less familiar than the others. A general conclusion is that the more advanced systems, if they prove feasible, will reduce trip time to the near planets by factors of 3 to 5, and will make several outer planets accessible to manned exploration. PROPULSION SYSTEMS FOR MANNED EXPLORATION OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM* byW. E. Moeckel Lewis Research Center SUMMARY What propulsion systems are in sight for fast interplanetary travel? Only a few show promise of reducing trip times to values comparable to those of 16th century terrestrial expeditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Pulsed Fusion Space Propulsion: Computational Ideal Magneto-Hydro Dynamics of a Magnetic Flux Compression Reaction Chamber
    Pulsed Fusion Space Propulsion: Computational Ideal Magneto-Hydro Dynamics of a Magnetic Flux Compression Reaction Chamber G. Romanelli Master of Science Thesis Space Systems Engineering PULSED FUSION SPACE PROPULSION: COMPUTATIONAL IDEAL MAGNETO-HYDRO DYNAMICS OFA MAGNETIC FLUX COMPRESSION REACTION CHAMBER by Gherardo ROMANELLI to obtain the degree of Master of Science at the Delft University of Technology, to be defended publicly on Friday February 26, 2016 at 10:00 AM. Student number: 4299876 Thesis committee: Dr. A. Cervone, TU Delft, supervisor Prof. Dr. E. K. A. Gill, TU Delft Dr. Ir. E. Mooij, TU Delft Prof. A. Mignone, Politecnico di Torino An electronic version of this thesis is available at http://repository.tudelft.nl/. To boldly go where no one has gone before. James T. Kirk ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all I would like to thank my supervisor Dr. A. Cervone who has always sup- ported me despite my “quite exotic” interests. He left me completely autonomous in shaping my thesis project, and still, was always there every time I needed help. Then, I would of course like to thank Prof. A. Mignone who decided to give his contribute to this seemingly crazy project of mine. His advice arrived just in time to give an happy ending to this story. Il ringraziamento più grande, però, va di certo alla mia famiglia. Alla mia mamma e a mio babbo, perché hanno sempre avuto fiducia in me e non hanno mai chiesto ragioni o spiegazioni alle mie scelte. Ai miei nonni, perché se di punto in bianco, un giorno di novembre ho deciso di intraprendere questa lunga strada verso l’Olanda, l’ho potuto fare anche per merito loro.
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Propulsion System Scaling for Asteroid Capture-And-Return Missions
    Electric propulsion system scaling for asteroid capture-and-return missions Justin M. Little⇤ and Edgar Y. Choueiri† Electric Propulsion and Plasma Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544 The requirements for an electric propulsion system needed to maximize the return mass of asteroid capture-and-return (ACR) missions are investigated in detail. An analytical model is presented for the mission time and mass balance of an ACR mission based on the propellant requirements of each mission phase. Edelbaum’s approximation is used for the Earth-escape phase. The asteroid rendezvous and return phases of the mission are modeled as a low-thrust optimal control problem with a lunar assist. The numerical solution to this problem is used to derive scaling laws for the propellant requirements based on the maneuver time, asteroid orbit, and propulsion system parameters. Constraining the rendezvous and return phases by the synodic period of the target asteroid, a semi- empirical equation is obtained for the optimum specific impulse and power supply. It was found analytically that the optimum power supply is one such that the mass of the propulsion system and power supply are approximately equal to the total mass of propellant used during the entire mission. Finally, it is shown that ACR missions, in general, are optimized using propulsion systems capable of processing 100 kW – 1 MW of power with specific impulses in the range 5,000 – 10,000 s, and have the potential to return asteroids on the order of 103 104 tons. − Nomenclature
    [Show full text]
  • AFSPC-CO TERMINOLOGY Revised: 12 Jan 2019
    AFSPC-CO TERMINOLOGY Revised: 12 Jan 2019 Term Description AEHF Advanced Extremely High Frequency AFB / AFS Air Force Base / Air Force Station AOC Air Operations Center AOI Area of Interest The point in the orbit of a heavenly body, specifically the moon, or of a man-made satellite Apogee at which it is farthest from the earth. Even CAP rockets experience apogee. Either of two points in an eccentric orbit, one (higher apsis) farthest from the center of Apsis attraction, the other (lower apsis) nearest to the center of attraction Argument of Perigee the angle in a satellites' orbit plane that is measured from the Ascending Node to the (ω) perigee along the satellite direction of travel CGO Company Grade Officer CLV Calculated Load Value, Crew Launch Vehicle COP Common Operating Picture DCO Defensive Cyber Operations DHS Department of Homeland Security DoD Department of Defense DOP Dilution of Precision Defense Satellite Communications Systems - wideband communications spacecraft for DSCS the USAF DSP Defense Satellite Program or Defense Support Program - "Eyes in the Sky" EHF Extremely High Frequency (30-300 GHz; 1mm-1cm) ELF Extremely Low Frequency (3-30 Hz; 100,000km-10,000km) EMS Electromagnetic Spectrum Equitorial Plane the plane passing through the equator EWR Early Warning Radar and Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity GBR Ground-Based Radar and Global Broadband Roaming GBS Global Broadcast Service GEO Geosynchronous Earth Orbit or Geostationary Orbit ( ~22,300 miles above Earth) GEODSS Ground-Based Electro-Optical Deep Space Surveillance
    [Show full text]
  • In a Comprehensive New Test, the Emdrive Fails to Generate Any Thrust 7 April 2021, by Paul M
    In a comprehensive new test, the EmDrive fails to generate any thrust 7 April 2021, by Paul M. Sutter conservation of momentum has been tested countless times over centuries—in fact, that principle forms the bedrock of almost every single theory of physics. So in essence, almost every time physics is tested, so is the conservation of momentum. The results of the Eagleworks experiment were not very strong. While the team claimed to measure a thrust, it wasn't statistically significant, and appeared to be a result of "cherry-picking"—the authors watching random fluctuations and waiting for the right time to report their results. But in the spirit of scientific replication, a team at the Dresden University of Technology led by Prof. Martin Tajmar rebuilt the Eagleworks experimental The EmDrive is a hypothetical rocket that setup. proponents claim can generate thrust with no exhaust. This would violate all known physics. In And they found squat. 2016, a team at NASA's Eagleworks lab claimed to measure thrust from an EmDrive device, the news Reporting their results in the Proceedings of Space of which caused quite a stir. The latest attempt to Propulsion Conference 2020, Prof. Tajmar said, replicate the shocking results has resulted in a "We found out that the cause of the 'thrust' was a simple answer: The Eagleworks measurement was thermal effect. For our tests, we used NASAs from heating of the engine mount, not any new EmDrive configuration from White et al. (which was physics. used at the Eagleworks laboratories, because it is best documented and the results were published in The EmDrive is a relatively simple device: It's an the Journal of Propulsion and Power.) empty cavity that isn't perfectly symmetrical.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimisation of Propellant Consumption for Power Limited Rockets
    Delft University of Technology Faculty Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science Delft Institute of Applied Mathematics Optimisation of Propellant Consumption for Power Limited Rockets. What Role do Power Limited Rockets have in Future Spaceflight Missions? (Dutch title: Optimaliseren van brandstofverbruik voor vermogen gelimiteerde raketten. De rol van deze raketten in toekomstige ruimtevlucht missies. ) A thesis submitted to the Delft Institute of Applied Mathematics as part to obtain the degree of BACHELOR OF SCIENCE in APPLIED MATHEMATICS by NATHALIE OUDHOF Delft, the Netherlands December 2017 Copyright c 2017 by Nathalie Oudhof. All rights reserved. BSc thesis APPLIED MATHEMATICS \ Optimisation of Propellant Consumption for Power Limited Rockets What Role do Power Limite Rockets have in Future Spaceflight Missions?" (Dutch title: \Optimaliseren van brandstofverbruik voor vermogen gelimiteerde raketten De rol van deze raketten in toekomstige ruimtevlucht missies.)" NATHALIE OUDHOF Delft University of Technology Supervisor Dr. P.M. Visser Other members of the committee Dr.ir. W.G.M. Groenevelt Drs. E.M. van Elderen 21 December, 2017 Delft Abstract In this thesis we look at the most cost-effective trajectory for power limited rockets, i.e. the trajectory which costs the least amount of propellant. First some background information as well as the differences between thrust limited and power limited rockets will be discussed. Then the optimal trajectory for thrust limited rockets, the Hohmann Transfer Orbit, will be explained. Using Optimal Control Theory, the optimal trajectory for power limited rockets can be found. Three trajectories will be discussed: Low Earth Orbit to Geostationary Earth Orbit, Earth to Mars and Earth to Saturn. After this we compare the propellant use of the thrust limited rockets for these trajectories with the power limited rockets.
    [Show full text]
  • Theory of Space Magnetic Sail Some Common Mistakes and Electrostatic Magsail
    1 Article MagSail after Cath for J 10 1 6 06 AIAA -2006 -8148 Theory of Space Magnetic Sail Some Common Mistakes and Electrostatic MagSail * Alexander Bolonkin C&R, 1310 Avenue R, #F -6, Brooklyn, NY 11229, USA T/F 718 -339 -4563, [email protected], http://Bolonki n.narod.ru Abstract The first reports on the “Space Magnetic Sail” concept appeared more 30 years ago. During the period since some hundreds of research and scientific works have been published, including hundreds of research report by professors at major famous universities. The author herein shows that all these works related to Space Magnetic Sail concept are technically incorrect because their authors did not take into consideration that solar wind impinging a MagSail magnetic field creates a particle m agnetic field opposed to the MagSail field. In the incorrect works, the particle magnetic field is hundreds times stronger than a MagSail magnetic field. That means all the laborious and costly computations in revealed in such technology discussions are us eless: the impractical findings on sail thrust (drag), time of flight within the Solar System and speed of interstellar trips are essentially worthless working data! The author reveals the correct equations for any estimated performance of a Magnetic Sail as well as a new type of Magnetic Sail (without a matter ring). Key words: magnetic sail, theory of MagSail, space magnetic sail, Electrostatic MagSail *Presented to 14th AIAA/AHI Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference , 6 - 9 Nov 2006 National Convention Centre, Canberra, Australia. Introduction The idea of utilizing the magnetic field to aggregate matter in space, harnessing a drag from solar wind or receiving a thrust from an Earth - charged particle beam is old.
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet Steps Toward Permanent Human Presence in Space
    SALYUT: Soviet Steps Toward Permanent Human Presence in Space December 1983 NTIS order #PB84-181437 Recommended Citation: SALYUT: Soviet Steps Toward Permanent Human Presence in Space–A Technical Mere- orandum (Washington, D. C.: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, OTA- TM-STI-14, December 1983). Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 83-600624 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 Foreword As the other major spacefaring nation, the Soviet Union is a subject of interest to the American people and Congress in their deliberations concerning the future of U.S. space activities. In the course of an assessment of Civilian Space Stations, the Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) has undertaken a study of the presence of Soviets in space and their Salyut space stations, in order to provide Congress with an informed view of Soviet capabilities and intentions. The major element in this technical memorandum was a workshop held at OTA in December 1982: it was the first occasion when a significant number of experts in this area of Soviet space activities had met for extended unclassified discussion. As a result of the workshop, OTA prepared this technical memorandum, “Salyut: Soviet Steps Toward Permanent Human Presence in Space. ” It has been reviewed extensively by workshop participants and others familiar with Soviet space activities. Also in December 1982, OTA wrote to the U. S. S. R.’s Ambassador to the United States Anatoliy Dobrynin, requesting any information concerning present and future Soviet space activities that the Soviet Union judged could be of value to the OTA assess- ment of civilian space stations.
    [Show full text]
  • NETS 2020 Template
    بÀƵƧǘȁǞƧƊǶ §ȲȌǐȲƊǿ ƊƧDzɈȌɈǘƵwȌȌȁƊȁƮȌȁ ɈȌwƊȲȺɈǘȲȌɐǐǘƊƮɨƊȁƧǞȁǐ خȁɐƧǶƵƊȲɈƵƧǘȁȌǶȌǐǞƵȺƊȁƮ ǞȁȁȌɨƊɈǞȌȁ ǞȺ ȺȯȌȁȺȌȲƵƮ Ʀɯ ɈǘƵ ƊDz ªǞƮǐƵ yƊɈǞȌȁƊǶ ׁׂ׀ׂ y0À² ÀǘǞȺ ƧȌȁǏƵȲƵȁƧƵ خׁׂ׀ׂ ةɈǘ׀׃ƊȁƮ ɩǞǶǶƦƵ ǘƵǶƮ ǏȲȌǿȯȲǞǶ ׂ׆ɈǘٌةmƊƦȌȲƊɈȌȲɯ ɩǞǶǶ ƦƵ ǘƵǶƮ ɨǞȲɈɐƊǶǶɯ ȺȌ ɈǘƊɈ ɈǘƵ ƵȁɈǞȲƵ y0À² خƧȌǿǿɐȁǞɈɯǿƊɯȯƊȲɈǞƧǞȯƊɈƵǞȁɈǘǞȺƵɮƧǞɈǞȁǐǿƵƵɈǞȁǐ ǐȌɨخȌȲȁǶخخׁׂ׀ȁƵɈȺׂششبǘɈɈȯȺ Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space Sponsored by Oak Ridge National Laboratory, April 26th-30th, 2021. Available online at https://nets2021.ornl.gov Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Thanks to the NETS2021 Sponsors! ...................................................................................................................... 2 Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space 2021 – Schedule at a Glance ................................................. 3 Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space 2021 – Technical Sessions and Panels By Track ............... 6 Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space 2021 – Lightning Talk Final Program ................................... 8 Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space 2021 – Track 1 Final Program ............................................. 11 Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space 2021 – Track 2 Final Program ............................................. 14 Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space 2021 – Track 3 Final Program ............................................. 18
    [Show full text]
  • Multisatellite Determination of the Relativistic Electron Phase Space Density at Geosynchronous Orbit: Methodology and Results During Geomagnetically Quiet Times Y
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 110, A10210, doi:10.1029/2004JA010895, 2005 Multisatellite determination of the relativistic electron phase space density at geosynchronous orbit: Methodology and results during geomagnetically quiet times Y. Chen, R. H. W. Friedel, and G. D. Reeves Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA T. G. Onsager NOAA, Boulder, Colorado, USA M. F. Thomsen Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA Received 10 November 2004; revised 20 May 2005; accepted 8 July 2005; published 20 October 2005. [1] We develop and test a methodology to determine the relativistic electron phase space density distribution in the vicinity of geostationary orbit by making use of the pitch-angle resolved energetic electron data from three Los Alamos National Laboratory geosynchronous Synchronous Orbit Particle Analyzer instruments and magnetic field measurements from two GOES satellites. Owing to the Earth’s dipole tilt and drift shell splitting for different pitch angles, each satellite samples a different range of Roederer L* throughout its orbit. We use existing empirical magnetic field models and the measured pitch-angle resolved electron spectra to determine the phase space density as a function of the three adiabatic invariants at each spacecraft. Comparing all satellite measurements provides a determination of the global phase space density gradient over the range L* 6–7. We investigate the sensitivity of this method to the choice of the magnetic field model and the fidelity of the instrument intercalibration in order to both understand and mitigate possible error sources. Results for magnetically quiet periods show that the radial slopes of the density distribution at low energy are positive, while at high energy the slopes are negative, which confirms the results from some earlier studies of this type.
    [Show full text]