DOCSLIB.ORG

Rothwell Ward

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rothwell Ward Health profile overview for Rothwell ward This profile presents a high level summary of health Population age structure: 20,699 in total related data sets for the Rothwell ward. Comparison of ward and Leeds age structures July 2020. Leeds as outline, ward shaded as follows to indicate ward This ward has a GP registered population of 20,699 resident proportions living in the most deprived 5th of Leeds, mid making it the fourth smallest ward in Leeds with the range, least deprived 5th of Leeds. majority of the ward population living in the mid range of deprivation. In Leeds terms the ward is ranked in 90-94 Females: 10,655 Males: 10,044 the mid range of the city by deprivation. 80-84 70-74 The age profile of this ward is quite different to Leeds, 60-64 but with slightly more elderly, and far fewer young 50-54 adults. 40-44 30-34 20-24 10-14 About deprivation in this report 0-4 Deprivation throughout England is measured using the Index of 6% 3% 0% 3% 6% Multiple Deprivation (IMD). The IMD provides a score for every part of England and we use this in Leeds to determine which Deprivation in this ward areas of Leeds are most deprived. Proportions of this population within each deprivation fifth of Leeds. July 2020. Leeds is divided into five groups from the most deprived fifth of 63% Leeds the "deprived fifth", to the least. Because this divides Leeds by MSOAs, it is a slightly generalised and removes detail in very small areas. 37% Ward deprivation scores take IMD scores for small areas, and weights them using population size in 2019. The result is like an 0% 0% 0% average deprivation score for the ward area but giving greater Most Least weight to those areas with more residents. 2nd most mid 2nd least deprived fifth deprived fifth https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/english-indices-of- deprivation-209 All wards by deprivation score GP recorded ethnicity, top 5 in ward % Ward % Leeds Wards are scored taking into account the numbers of people and the levels of deprivation where they live, the higher the score the White British 92.1% 69.5% more deprived the ward population. Other White Background 4.6% 9.5% Burmantofts & Richmond Hill 58 Indian or British Indian 0.5% 2.7% Gipton & Harehills 56 Killingbeck & Seacroft 52 Chinese 0.4% 1.8% Hunslet & Riverside 50 Armley 46 White Irish 0.4% 0.6% Middleton Park 45 (GP ethnicity data July 2020, does not contain unknowns, blanks etc) Beeston & Holbeck 42 Bramley & Stanningley 40 Chapel Allerton 36 Farnley & Wortley 35 Kirkstall 33 Main spoken language, top 6 in ward % Ward % Leeds Temple Newsam 30 Little London & Woodhouse 28 English 19,547 94% 76% Cross Gates & Whinmoor 28 Morley South 25 Blank unknown refused could not be Pudsey 22 communicated 612 3% 11% Headingley & Hyde Park 20 Rothwell 20 All other 419 languages Weetwood 18 391 2% 8% Morley North 18 Ardsley & Robin Hood 17 Polish Otley & Yeadon 17 90 0% 1% Kippax & Methley 16 Roundhay 16 Romanian 0% 1% Calverley & Farsley 16 29 Alwoodley 16 Moortown 14 Arabic 11 0% 1% Garforth & Swillington 13 Guiseley & Rawdon 11 (GP ethnicity data July 2020, contains unknowns, blanks etc) Horsforth 11 Wetherby 10 Adel & Wharfedale 10 Harewood 8 Rothwell Ward 2020.pdf Child obesity - reception classes and year 6 classes in 2018/19 Rates of children who are overweight or obese as provided by the National Child Measurement Programme (NCMP). The data shows children by ward of residence as a proportion of all children in the ward. The wards are ranked in descending order of deprivation score and this ward is outlined in red. Because the wards are ranked by deprivation it is possible to see a fall in rates from left to right - the least deprived wards tend to have lower rates of child deprivation - more noticeable in Year 6. Reception Year 6 50% 50% 40% 40% Overweight 30% 30% Very overweight 20% 20% This ward 10% 10% 0% 0% Most deprived Least deprived Most deprived Least deprived Looked after children KS4 % achieving a strong pass in English and Maths 160 60% 140 50% 120 40% 100 80 30% 60 20% 40 10% 20 0 0% Most deprived Least deprived Most deprived Least deprived Number of looked after children in wards in July 2020, by Percentage of pupils achieving a strong pass (grades 9-5) in location before becoming looked after. Wards are ranked English and maths at Key Stage 4. Wards are ranked from from most to least deprived. most to least deprived, and rates are based on pupil home address, not their school address. Data from 2018/19 The wards are shown ranked by deprivation and despite academic year. variations in population sizes the general picture shows larger counts in more deprived areas. UC and JSA claimants as % of 16-64 year olds 18 16 Claimants as a proportion of 14 residents aged 16-64 12 10 % 8 6 4 2 0 Most deprived Least deprived Universal Credit and Job Seekers Allowance claimants as a proportion of residents aged 16-64. August 2020 The wards are ranked by levels of deprivation and, there is a clear reduction in proportions of claimants as deprivation falls. Rothwell Ward 2020.pdf GP recorded conditions, April 2020 (age standardised rates per 100,000 ) These charts show all 33 wards in rank order by directly age standardised rate (DSR). DSR removes the effect that differing age structures have on data, and allow comparison of 'young' and 'old' areas. The small areas (MSOAs) within wards are overlaid as red dots and often differ widely. This data includes all Leeds GP registered patients who live within the ward. How to read these charts GP data can only reflect those patients who visit their doctor. Certain groups within the population are known to present Red wards are late, or not at all, therefore it is important to remember that significantly White wards Red dots are higher than are not areas making GP data is not the whole of the picture. Leeds significantly up this ward different to (MSOAs) 0 20 40 Leeds 60 80 100 Deprived Leeds 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 10,000 Asthma (under 16s) 8,000 6,000 THIS Ward 5,699 ward is 4,000 outlined Green wards are Leeds 6,264 in red 2,000 significantly Deprived fifth 6,054 lower than Leeds 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 35,000 5,000 CHD 30,000 Adult obesity (BMI>30) 4,000 25,000 20,000 3,000 Ward 3,444 Ward 24,772 15,000 2,000 Leeds 3,610 10,000 Leeds 23,998 1,000 5,000 Deprived fifth 4,391 Deprived fifth 28,070 0 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 5,000 6,000 Cancer 5,000 COPD 4,000 4,000 3,000 Ward 4,702 3,000 Ward 2,464 2,000 2,000 Leeds 4,303 Leeds 2,594 1,000 1,000 Deprived fifth 3,849 Deprived fifth 4,519 0 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 12,000 30,000 10,000 Diabetes 25,000 Common mental health issues 8,000 20,000 6,000 Ward 5,684 15,000 Ward 23,665 4,000 Leeds 6,563 10,000 Leeds 23,560 2,000 5,000 Deprived fifth 9,615 Deprived fifth 22,950 0 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 3,000 40,000 0 20 40 60 80 100 2,500 Severe mental health issues (18+) 35,000 Smoking (16+) 30,000 2,000 25,000 1,500 Ward 864 20,000 Ward 15,191 1,000 15,000 Leeds 1,301 10,000 Leeds 17,506 500 Deprived fifth 1,825 5,000 Deprived fifth 26,172 0 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 1,000 9,000 900 Learning disabilities (18+) 8,000 Dementia (65+) 800 7,000 700 6,000 600 5,000 500 Ward 522 Ward 3,741 400 4,000 300 Leeds 490 3,000 Leeds 4,592 200 2,000 100 Deprived fifth 622 1,000 Deprived fifth 6,267 0 0 Rothwell Ward 2020.pdf Life expectancy at birth, 2017-10 ranked wards 0 20 40 60 80 100 (years) Males Females 90y 0 20 40 60 80 100 90y Male Female Ward 80.2 82.2 80y 80y Leeds resident 78.4 81.7 70y 70y Deprived Leeds* 73.8 77.0 60y 60y The relationship between deprivation and life expectancy is well established and can be seen Life expectancy at birth, 2017-19. Ranked by deprivation clearly here. 90y 90y Male Female The Least deprived wards are shown first, 80y 80y deprivation rises from left to right and the line indicates a linear trend of decline as deprivation 70y 70y rises. Male life expectancy shows a greater 60y 60y variation with deprivation - the trend line is steeper. Least dep Most dep. Least dep Most dep. All cause mortality - under 75s, 2015-19 ranked wards 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 (DSR per 100,000) All Males Females 1,000 1,000 800 800 Ward 348 381 317 600 600 Highest MSOA in ward 358 393 339 400 400 Lowest MSOA in ward 326 373 264 200 200 Leeds resident 359 429 289 0 0 All Male Female Deprived fifth 560 660 452 DSR - Directly Standardised Rate removes the effect that age structures have on data, allows comparison of 'young' and 'old' areas Cancer mortality - under 75s, 2015-19 ranked wards (DSR per 100,000) All Males Females 300 300 250 250 Ward 154 151 156 200 200 Highest MSOA in ward 157 160 172 150 150 100 100 Lowest MSOA in ward 140 141 119 50 50 Leeds resident 141 157 128 0 0 All Male Female Deprived fifth 201 220 183 Circulatory disease mortality - under 75s, 2015-19 ranked wards (DSR per 100,000) All Males Females 250 250 200 200 Ward 56 79 36 150 150 Highest MSOA in ward 69 102 38 100 100 Lowest MSOA in ward 47 64 31 50 50 Leeds resident 79 108 51 0 0 All Male Female Deprived fifth 133 173 89 Respiratory disease mortality - under 75s, 2015-19 ranked wards (DSR per 100,000) All Males Females 150 150 Ward 29 31 26 100 100 Highest MSOA in ward 34 49 33 50 50 Lowest MSOA in ward 25 22 21 Leeds resident 30 32 28 0 0 All Male Female Deprived fifth 60 63 54 Ordnance Survey PSMA Data, Licence Number 100050507, (c) Crown Copyright 2011, All rights reserved.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE ROTHWELL, LOFTHOUSE, OULTON with WOODLESFORD and METHLEY with MICKLETOWN TEAM BROCHURE
    Holy Trinity Church, Church Street, Rothwell, LS26 0QL Parish Profile THE ROTHWELL, LOFTHOUSE, OULTON WITH WOODLESFORD and METHLEY WITH MICKLETOWN TEAM BROCHURE January 2018 1 Holy Trinity Church, Church Street, Rothwell, LS26 0QL Parish Profile THE OPPORTUNITY We are looking and praying for a Team Rector who will lead us, and bring new energy to support us in collaborating our Mission & Ministry across our four parishes. THE TEAM, ITS PARISHES AND THE AREA TEAM LOCATION All four parishes cluster around the M1/M62 intersection in easy reach of both Leeds and Wakefield. Many of our people have coal mining in their blood and the Benefice encompasses the world-famous Rhubarb Triangle. DIVERSITY ACROSS THE TEAM For all our geographical closeness, each community has a distinct character. Rothwell was a large mining village which has grown into a significant suburban centre and feels like a small town. Lofthouse is a ribbon development of mining and agricultural communities along a main road where in recent decades many housing estates have grown up. Oulton with Woodlesford combines historic housing of the wealthy with some challenging estates and has a good selection of shops and other facilities. Methley is a large village set amidst the estate of its aristocratic lords of the manor which is joined with the mining centre of Mickletown where most people live. TEAM HISTORY Two parishes are in the Domesday Book, but all owe their population growth to coal mining and associated industries. They all now attract commuters into the cities and so all communities within the Team continue to grow.
    [Show full text]
  • Maps of Leeds and Yorkshire  1:1250 (50” to 1 Mile)
    Useful Websites www.maps.nls.uk. National Library of Scotland website, providing digital access to 6” OS maps from 1850 to the 1930s www.oldmapsonline.org. Digitized maps, including OS and Goad www.tracksintime.wyjs.org.uk. West Yorkshire Archive Service project to digitize Tithe maps, which can be viewed along with 25” OS maps Useful Books Maurice Beresford. East End, West End: The Face of Leeds During Urbanisation, 1684 – 1842 (1988; Thoresby Society: Vols. 60-61). Study of Leeds’ transition from rural to urban town. Includes detailed analysis of the relevant maps showing that development L 906 THO Kenneth J. Bonser & Harold Nichols. Printed Maps and Plans of Leeds, 1711-1900 (1960; Thoresby Society: Vol.47). Core text that “list[s] all the known printed plans and maps of Leeds up to and including the year 1900, together with certain points of view.” L 906 THO Thoresby Society and Leeds City Libraries. ‘Leeds in Maps’. Booklet to accompany set of 10 maps representing “aspects of the growth and development of Leeds through two centuries.” Please ask staff David Thornton. Leeds: A Historical Dictionary of People, Places and Events (2013). Essential guide to the history of Leeds – includes an entry briefly detailing the development of Leeds cartography, while the Local and Family History appendix lists fourteen of the most important maps of the area L E 914.2 THO Research Guides Scale Guide (see also the pictorial examples in this guide) 10ft to 1 mile. Approximately 120” to 1 mile 5ft to 1 mile. Approximately 60” to 1 mile Maps of Leeds and Yorkshire 1:1250 (50” to 1 mile).
    [Show full text]
  • The Leeds (Electoral Changes) Order 2017
    Draft Order laid before Parliament under section 59(9) of the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009; draft to lie for forty days pursuant to section 6(1) of the Statutory Instruments Act 1946, during which period either House of Parliament may resolve that the Order be not made. DRAFT STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2017 No. LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The Leeds (Electoral Changes) Order 2017 Made - - - - *** Coming into force in accordance with article 1(2) and (3) Under section 58(4) of the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009( a) (“the Act”), the Local Government Boundary Commission for England( b) (“the Commission”) published a report dated March 2017 stating its recommendations for changes to the electoral arrangements for the city of Leeds. The Commission has decided to give effect to those recommendations. A draft of the instrument has been laid before each House of Parliament, a period of forty days has expired since the day on which it was laid and neither House has resolved that the instrument be not made. The Commission makes the following Order in exercise of the power conferred by section 59(1) of the Act. Citation and commencement 1. —(1) This Order may be cited as the Leeds (Electoral Changes) Order 2017. (2) This article and article 2 come into force on the day after the day on which this Order is made. (3) The remainder of this Order comes into force— (a) for the purpose of proceedings preliminary, or relating, to the election of councillors, on the day after the day on which it is made; (b) for all other purposes, on the ordinary day of election of councillors in England and Wales( c) in 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Profile Overview for Weetwood Ward
    Weetwood ward April 2019 Health profile overview for Weetwood ward This profile presents a high level summary of health Population age structure: 23,211 in total related data sets for the Weetwood ward. Comparison of ward and Leeds age structures January 2019. Leeds as outline, ward shaded. This ward has a GP registered population of 23,211 Mid range Most deprived 5th Least deprived 5th with the majority of the ward population living in the 100-104 Males: 11,722 Females: 11,487 least deprived fifth of Leeds. In Leeds terms the ward 90-94 is ranked in the mid range of the city by deprivation. 80-84 The age profile of this ward is very similar to Leeds, 70-74 but with slightly more very young adults. 60-64 50-54 40-44 30-34 About deprivation in this report 20-24 Deprivation throughout England is measured using the Index of 10-14 Multiple Deprivation (IMD). The IMD is the result of analysis in seven 'domains': Income, employment, education, health, 0-4 crime, barriers to housing & services, and living environment. 6% 3% 0% 3% 6% The IMD provides a score for every part of England and we use Deprivation in this ward this in Leeds to determine which areas of Leeds are most Proportions of this population within each deprivation fifth of deprived. Leeds. January 2019. Leeds is divided into five groups from the most deprived fifth of 49% Leeds the "deprived fifth", to the least. Because this divides Leeds by MSOAs, it is a slightly generalised and removes detail 25% in very small areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Brownfield Land Update Schedule (Updated 29Th August 2014)
    Council Brownfield Land Update Schedule (Updated 29th August 2014) Target date to Method of Approximate No Stage 1 / Site name Ward SHLAA Reference commence Size (Ha) Use Planning Approach Programme Plan preparation Status August 2014 Comments Disposal of Units technical disposal Brooksbank HOP, Outline Planning Brooksbank Drive, Temple Newsam N/A Marketed Informal Tender 0.2 6 Residential Capital Receipt COMPLETED COMPLETED Sold Sold Permission Halton Burley Hall in Leeds, 0.26 total Informal Planning Kirkstall N/A Marketed Auction 4 Residential Capital Receipt COMPLETED COMPLETED Sold Sold Kirkstall Lane (LCC 0.05) Guidance The Lodge, Allerton Existing No formal planning Roundhay Existing Building 01/03/2014 Auction 1 Residential Capital Receipt COMPLETED COMPLETED Sold Sold at auction in April 2014. Grange High School Building gudiance required Stratford Court, School Lane, Chapel Chapel Allerton N/A Markted 1 to 1 0.25 27 Residential N/A Capital Receipt N/A N/A Sold Sold to Unity for social housing. Allerton Promotion to Middleton Park Affordable Middleton Park N/A Marketed Registered 0.3 12 residential N/A N/A N/A Sold Sold to Accent HA for affordable housing. Grove, Middleton Housing Providers Burmantofts and Existing No formal planning 89 Cross Green Lane Existing Building 01/02/2014 Auction 1 Residential Capital Receipt N/A N/A Sold Sold at auction in April 2014. Richmond Hill Building gudiance required Existing 12 Bellbrooke Place Gipton & Harehills Existing Building Marketed Informal tender 1 Residential N/A Capital Receipt N/A
    [Show full text]
  • Leeds City Council Elections Thursday 10
    Leeds City Council Elections Thursday 10th June 2004 DECLARATION OF RESULT OF POLL Adel & Wharfedale Ward I, the undersigned, being the Returning Officer at the Election of Members for the Adel & Wharfedale Ward of Leeds City Council, do hereby give notice that the number of votes recorded for each candidate in the above election has resulted in the following: Candidate Name Party/Description Votes BARRY JOHN ANDERSON CONSERVATIVE 4844 ALISTAIR BRADLEY LIBERAL DEMOCRATS 1707 JOHN LESLIE CARTER CONSERVATIVE 4708 MARCUS CHARLTON BNP 568 CLIVE JAN FOX CONSERVATIVE 4551 NIGEL JAMES GILL LABOUR 1291 PATRICK DAMIAN HENNIGAN LABOUR 1043 PHILIP HARRISON MOORE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS 2007 CHRISTINA SHAW LIBERAL DEMOCRATS 2130 AUDREY JOYCE SLEE LABOUR 1412 The number of ballot papers rejected was as follows: Want of official mark 0 Voting for more than three candidates 0 Writing or mark by which voter could be identified 0 Unmarked or void for uncertainty 4 Rejected in part 4 Total 8 I do hereby declare that the said BARRY JOHN ANDERSON JOHN LESLIE CARTER CLIVE JAN FOX are duly elected for the Adel & Wharfedale Ward of Leeds City Council. Paul Rogerson, Returning Officer Leeds City Council Elections Thursday 10th June 2004 DECLARATION OF RESULT OF POLL Alwoodley Ward I, the undersigned, being the Returning Officer at the Election of Members for the Alwoodley Ward of Leeds City Council, do hereby give notice that the number of votes recorded for each candidate in the above election has resulted in the following: Candidate Name Party/Description Votes
    [Show full text]
  • General Election 2015 Richard Keen Nambassa Nakatudde
    BRIEFING PAPER Number CBP7186, 28 July 2015 By Oliver Hawkins General Election 2015 Richard Keen Nambassa Nakatudde Inside: 1. Introduction 2. Countries and regions 3. Parties 4. Seats changing hands 5. Who voted for which party? 6. Candidates 7. Characteristics of those elected 8. The electorate, turnout and invalid votes 9. Safe and marginal seats 10. MPs who did not stand for re-election 11. Incumbent MPs who were defeated 12. New MPs 13. By-elections and changes of allegiance 2010-15 14. Polling day 15. Opinion polls 16. Constituencies www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Number CBP7186, 28 July 2015 Contents Summary 4 General Election 2015 seat winners map 5 General Election 2015 seat winners in equal sized constituencies 6 1. Introduction 7 2. Countries and regions 11 2.1 United Kingdom 11 2.2 Great Britain 12 2.3 England 13 2.4 Scotland 14 2.5 Wales 15 2.6 Northern Ireland 16 2.7 North East 17 2.8 North West 18 2.9 Yorkshire and the Humber 19 2.10 East Midlands 20 2.11 West Midlands 21 2.12 East of England 22 2.13 London 23 2.14 South East 24 2.15 South West 25 3. Parties 26 3.1 Conservative 26 3.2 Labour 28 3.3 Scottish National Party 30 3.4 Liberal Democrats 32 3.5 Plaid Cymru 34 3.6 United Kingdom Independence Party 36 3.7 Green Party 38 3.8 DUP and Sinn Féin 40 3.9 SDLP and UUP 41 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Actually Oulton)Excuding Churchyard Notes (N.B
    Notes on local history Written by the Rev. Mercer c.1948. Volume 1. Rothwell (Actually Oulton)Excuding Churchyard notes (N.B. Pedigree charts and hand-drawn maps have not been transcribed) Local Names:- Ardsley Earl’s burial mound Bottomboat boat at Bottom, refers to a ferry boat Methley O.E. council-meadow Fleet fleet=stream, a running stream. Moscar carr (kjarr) = moss. O.E. mos=a bog. O.N. mosi = marsh. O.N. copsewood. Lofthouse O.D. loft on upper floor, and Scandinavian huse bears witness to a 2- storeyed house. Lidgate O.E. hlid-geat = swing gate Nookin corner Mankin Holes ?Celt maini = stone, and ‘can’ Oulton, Olton old settlement (Saxon) Ouzelwell O.E. osle = blackbird. O.E. well Pontefract first Tanshyelf, and Tateshal and Kirkby Rothwell, Rodewelle O.N. Rauthi’s or red spring Scholes (A.S. skyl) prim.cire excavated dwelling with sticks to form roof Stanley O.E. stan = stone Swithen O.N. sveen, a place cleaned bu burning Wridelesford Wridel’s or Wodel’s ford York 1st Celtic Ebrauc; A.S. Eoforwie = boar place Tingley D.B. Thing-lawe, or Thegn’s field But Morley was the head of the Wapentake. “Street Lane”. Lee Horse Fair, possibly founded by the Romans to obtain horses (St Oswald’s Priory at Nostell sold 1539 to Thomas Legh, O.C.L., with Woodkirk fair in 1316. Incumbents 1. John Kershaw Craig, 1832 2. Jonathan Muncaster (1775-1847). Oct. ’35. ’39- 3. Richard Hugh Hamilton, former Curate of Rothwell. 1847-6/’89. Rector of Artley. Had houses and built stables.
    [Show full text]
  • Elmet & Rothwell Constituency 11
    Appendix I 11 Elmet & Rothwell Constituency Ward: Garforth & Swillington Polling District(s): GSA – Aberford & District Parish Council (Sturton Grange Ward) GSB Polling Station(s): GSA – Firthfields Community Centre, Firthfields, Garforth GSB - Firthfields Community Centre, Firthfields, Garforth Electorate: GSA – 307 GSB - 1742 The following proposal has been submitted on behalf of Elmet & Rothwell Conservative Association. Proposal: New polling station for GSA and additional polling station for GSB (GSB/2) at East Garforth Primary School. Remainder of GSB to continue to vote at Firthfields Community Centre. Revised Electorate: GSB - 1372 GSB/2 - 677 Officers Comments: Polling district GSA is in the Parish of Aberford and District (Sturton Grange Ward). Electors currently vote at Firthfields Community Centre as there is no suitable building within the polling district. (See also proposal 16). Above proposal is subject to confirmation of availability and suitability of school. 12 Ward: Garforth & Swillington Polling District(s): GSC GSD GSE Polling Station(s): GSC – Garforth WMC, (Concert Room), Barley Hill Road, Garforth GSD – Garforth Community Association, (Miners Welfare Hall), 56 Main Street, Garforth GSE – Strawberry Fields Primary School, (Community Room), Lidgett Lane, Garforth Electorate: GSC - 1414 GSD - 1183 GSE - 1376 The following proposal has been submitted on behalf of Elmet & Rothwell Conservative Association. Proposal: Merge part GSC with GSE to vote at Strawberry Fields Primary School and merge the remainder of GSC With
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Care Network (PCN) Overview
    Primary Care Network (PCN) Overview The following information is designed to provide you and your pharmacy team with a brief overview of Primary Care Networks (PCNs) and their importance to pharmacy over the next five to ten years. What is a PCN? PCNs are essentially GP practices joining together to work locally with community service providers and other health and care organisations, including community pharmacies. PCNs are based on GP lists, typically serving populations of around 30,000 to 50,000 patients and comprising 5-6 general practices and up to 9-10 community pharmacies. Small enough to give a sense of local ownership but big enough to have an impact across the local population. PCNs will have teams comprising of a range of staff, e.g. GPs, practice/clinical pharmacists and allied health professionals, led by a Clinical Director/Clinical Lead. See NHS England video: What Are Primary Care Networks for an overview of PCNs. In West Yorkshire we have the unusual situation where similar structures in the form of Community Partnerships (CPs) have been in place for some time. With some exceptions, the PCN footprints correspond in the most part to those of the CPs. Where variations occur, this is generally due to the size of population within a CP area, exceeding the desired population size for a PCN. Please see the table below for details. How will Patients Benefit from PCNs? PCNs aim to benefit patients within the PCN area by strengthening and redesigning health and social care and bringing together a range of professionals to work together to provide enhanced personalised and preventative care for their local community.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Proposals for New Parliamentary Constituency Boundaries in The
    Initial proposals for new Parliamentary constituency boundaries in Yorkshire and the Humber Contents Summary 3 1 What is the Boundary Commission for England? 5 2 Background to the 2018 Review 7 3 Initial proposals for Yorkshire and the Humber 11 Initial proposals for the Humberside sub‑region 12 Initial proposals for the North Yorkshire, West Yorkshire 13 and South Yorkshire sub‑region 4 How to have your say 21 Annex A: Initial proposals for constituencies, 25 including wards and electorates Glossary 35 Initial proposals for new Parliamentary constituency boundaries in Yorkshire and the Humber 1 Summary Who we are and what we do What is changing in Yorkshire and the Humber? The Boundary Commission for England is an independent and impartial Yorkshire and the Humber has non‑departmental public body which is been allocated 50 constituencies – responsible for reviewing Parliamentary a reduction of four from the current constituency boundaries in England. number. The 2018 Review Our proposals leave three of the 54 existing constituencies unchanged. We have the task of periodically reviewing the boundaries of all the Parliamentary As it has not always been possible to constituencies in England. We are currently allocate whole numbers of constituencies conducting a review on the basis of rules to individual counties, we have grouped set by Parliament in 2011. The rules tell some county and local authority areas us that we must make recommendations into sub‑regions. The number of for new Parliamentary constituency constituencies allocated to each sub‑region boundaries in September 2018. They is determined by the electorate of the also result in a significant reduction in combined local authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Rothwell and Robin Hood Walking & Cycling Improvements
    Report author: Nick Borras Tel: 0113 3787497 Report to the Chief Officer (Highways & Transportation) Date: 23 February 2021 Subject: Rothwell & Robin Hood - Walking & Cycling Improvements Are specific electoral wards affected? Yes No If yes, name(s) of ward(s): Ardsley & Robin Hood, Middleton and Rothwell Has consultation been carried out? Yes No Are there implications for equality and diversity and cohesion and Yes No integration? Will the decision be open for call-in? Yes No Does the report contain confidential or exempt information? Yes No If relevant, access to information procedure rule number: Appendix number: Summary 1. Main issues The Transport Hubs Improvements and Public Transport Access Schemes are a part of the Connecting Leeds Programme within the overall West Yorkshire Transport Hubs and Connecting Communities work stream. The aim of the project is to create new, or upgrade existing, facilities, to improve the waiting environment and travel information offer as well as enhancing connections between public transport hubs and local communities by improving walking and cycling links. The Transport Hub Improvement schemes will also achieve the overarching objectives of providing transport facilities that improve peoples’ access to jobs and opportunities, bringing a major economic boost to the City and driving economic growth and value for the City Region. In addition to the overarching objectives, the scheme proposals also contribute to specific objectives that have been developed for the Transport Hubs and Connecting Communities work stream, these being: 1. To increase patronage on public transport; 2. To provide attractive, safe and direct pedestrian and cycle routes to public transport interchanges; 3.
    [Show full text]