DOCSLIB.ORG

Specific Features of Historical Evolution

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SPECIFIC FEATURES OF HISTORICAL EVOLUTION Through the turbulent course of history with its The transition to the Iron Age (1000 years kaleidoscopic changes, Ukraine appeared on the B. C.) was marked not only by evident climatic geographical and political maps of Europe in changes, which to a great extent caused the re- the blink of an eye, disappearing from them just duction in the native population over the entire as suddenly, only to arise anew with a variety territory of what would become in the future, of names, territories and borders. It has experi- Ukrainian ethnic territory. The Iron Age also wit- enced a troubled and unique history which is nessed a significant transformation of the terri- rooted in ancient times; a dramatic, yet some- tory's economics and way of life. Important fea- times tragic and heroic era; periods of crucial tures in the ethnogenesis of the Ukrainians were change contrasted with relative stability (which left by a number of cultures at particular refer- at times has verged on economic and political ence points in history, such as Greek colonisers stagnation) as well as periods of state welfare north of the Black Sea coast; nomads from the and centuries of stateless existence. Its own he- Eurasian steppe (the Scythian and Sarmatians); roes and anti-heroes figure large in the past. Thracian, Teutonic (German) and Baltic proto- The historical development of civilisa- cultures. The influence of ancient civilisations tion on Ukrainian soil is notable for its richness broadened the outlook of the native population and variety. Ukraine's involved and complex re- of ethnic Ukrainian territories and enabled their construction is only possible today if this process engagement with European civilisation. is a unity of considerations that are both objec- The period from 1000 B. C. – 1000 A. D. tive and subjective, social and ethnic, collective heralded the formation of the first groups of eth- and individual in nature. Society's development nic Slavs in the southeast Europe region. The is not determined by a particular factor, and Zarubintsy, Cherniakhiv and Kiev archeological mankind's evolution has always been affected cultures are representative of this development by a variety of influences: economic, political, in Ukraine. At the turn of 4th and 5th centuries ideological, religious, cultural, and more. the confederation of Venedian tribes (which as- During their history that spans more than similated non-Slavic groups of the population) a millennium, the Ukrainians have passed over a broke up into several independent tribes of long and difficult road of development. The suc- Sklavians and Antes, who in turn, formed new cessive change of archeological cultures, ancient archeological cultures. The first centuries of the and nomadic proto-civilisations as well as the Christian era were marked by the transition formation of a quasi-Slavic state all took place on from the prehistoric period to the advent of the Ukrainian ethnic territory. According to archeologi- first historical tribes in the south and southwest cal discoveries, the first group of native inhabitants territories of Ukraine, as well as the formation of that lived within the historical borders of modern late Scythian states on the Crimean steppe and Ukraine, can trace their roots back to Stone Age in the Danube delta. and the first archeological artifacts left by human The massive settling of Slavs in the activity date back to the Paleolithic period. Ukrainian forest-steppe region in the second Waves of migration, which were typical half of the first millennium was the impetus for for Europe during the Stone and Bronze Ages, the formation of Slavic “ethnic and cultural sym- influenced the ethno-genetic processes to a great biosis”, which would become the genetic core of extent, especially in such historical regions as: Ukrainian nationality in the future. Polissia, Volhynia (Volyn), Podolia (Podillia), the The evolutionary development of Slavic Ukrainian Carpathians, Middle Dnipro Region tribal unions led to the establishment of econom- and Nadporizhzhia. This migration also resulted ic, political and social institutions. The rise of in the development of specific archeological cul- the powerful Old Russian state, with its political tures on the left and right banks of the Dnipro centre in Kiev, took place in the final 300 years of river, coastal lowland of the Black Sea and the the first millennium (Figure 7). Its golden age fell Dnister region. during the rule of Princes Volodymyr the Great 19 20 (Saint) and Yaroslav the Wise. Owing to its mili- During the so called Polish-Lithuanian tary strength and dynastic marriages strengthen- period, the historical development of the ing the power of the princes, the economic devel- Ukrainians had a specific character. Being part opment of Kievan Rus’, centralisation in its home of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, and later in- and foreign policy, and cultural development corporated in Rzeczpospolita i.e. the Polish– following from its adoption of Christianity re- Lithuanian Commonwealth, the Ukrainians on sulted in it becoming one of the most influential the one hand were enriched by progressive west- states in eastern Europe at the turn of 10th–11th ern European ideas, and on the other received centuries. However, the period of political, cul- important lessons in the struggle for national tural and national development of this ancient identity. The historical evolution of Ukrainians Russian state was short-lived. Internal centrifu- is fundamentally punctuated around this time gal processes, as a by-product of the previous by the formation of a new social community on development of this poly-ethnical state (which the eastern borders: the Cossacks, who created was, for a period of time the empire of the Rurik original state form – Zaporozhian Army (Viysko Dynasty which united different principalities of Zaporizhske). In the political and religious fields Slavic tribal unions and other non-Slavic groups) the unions of Lublin (1569) and Brest (1596) were caused the gradual division of Kievan Rus’ into signed (Figure 7). 15 independent principalities in the 12th and 13th The time interval of a little over 200 years centuries. Under the prevailing conditions of po- that historians called the Cossack period, occu- litical fragmentation, the baton founding the na- pies a very important place in the historical de- tion was taken by the Galych–Volhynian (Galicia velopment of Ukraine (Figures 7 and 8). It was – Volyn) state (Figure 7). a crucial point in Ukrainian history, when the Further development of the Ukrainian hitherto slow course of events abruptly accel- nation included large territories, such as Kiev, erated in a cataclysmic manner and influenced Pereiaslav, Chernihiv–Siversk, Galych–Volhynia the panoply of human activity. The result was principalities, and it partly covered present- a radical turn in Ukrainian history. The reasons day areas of Bukovina and Transcarpathia that caused the appearance of the Cossack state, (Figure 7). During the 15th–17th centuries the were complex and included economic, politi- Ukrainians moved on to the south, colonising cal, social, military and strategic factors. The Slobozhanschina (”Free Ukraine”), and at the Cossacks were the first ethnic community that beginning of the 18th century settled in coastal came to reflect the characteristic features of the regions of the Black Sea and Sea of Azov. Ethnic Ukrainians as an ethnically independent soci- and social development took place under com- ety. It would be difficult to overestimate the sig- plicated conditions imposed by the division of nificance of the Cossacks in the development Ukrainian territories. The existence of political of the liberation movement and social struggle borders was the reason distinctive features of of the masses. Over a lengthy period of time, differing regions of Ukraine were preserved. the Cossacks were the only force who would Historical development for the spar with neighbouring states in the name of the Ukrainians in a variety of fields had far from Ukrainians, fighting for their right to an exist- stopped at this stage. During their ethnogen- ence and economic and spiritual development. esis, the medieval Ukrainians were enriched In the political field, the Cossacks estab- by the experience of a social and national lib- lished a new era of nation-building. The creation eration movement, which has evolved into the of Zaporozhian Sich, which was the Cossack con- modern Ukrainian nation, with its unique na- ception of a state, meant that the Ukrainian state tional consciousness, a highly developed sense organisation was enriched by historical forms, of spirituality and culture. This complicated and which were inadequate for economic and social controversial process receved new qualitative basis of late medieval community. A republican forms in the following centuries. The primary form of government and the participation of a example was an economic union which took the wide circle of Cossacks in the decision-making form of close inner commercial and economic process around economic and social problems ties that fused the independent regions together, resulted in Zaporozhian Sich becoming a strong and also resulted in intensive migration between political organisation with a wide field of activ- these regions. ity. During the different periods of its existence, 21 22 Zaporozhian Sich was not a “republic in itself”, borders of ethnic Ukrainian territories. The but always strove for expansion of its political Ukrainians were highly populous in the coastal sovereignty to the other Ukrainian lands. lowland along the Black Sea (Figure 8). The 1640s were marked by the event that The 19th century was an ambiguous fundamentally changed the course of Ukrainian era for the historical evolution of Ukraine. history and predetermined it in many respects. Despite being assimilated into the empires of The national liberation movement between the the Hapsburgs and Romanovs (Figure 8), the 1640s to the 1670s had no rival in Europe for its Ukrainians managed to significantly develop strength, scope and results.
Recommended publications
  • The Role of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi and the Kozaks in the Rusin Struggle for Independence from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth: 1648--1649

    The Role of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi and the Kozaks in the Rusin Struggle for Independence from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth: 1648--1649

    University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor Electronic Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Major Papers 1-1-1967 The role of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi and the Kozaks in the Rusin struggle for independence from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth: 1648--1649. Andrew B. Pernal University of Windsor Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd Recommended Citation Pernal, Andrew B., "The role of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi and the Kozaks in the Rusin struggle for independence from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth: 1648--1649." (1967). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 6490. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/6490 This online database contains the full-text of PhD dissertations and Masters’ theses of University of Windsor students from 1954 forward. These documents are made available for personal study and research purposes only, in accordance with the Canadian Copyright Act and the Creative Commons license—CC BY-NC-ND (Attribution, Non-Commercial, No Derivative Works). Under this license, works must always be attributed to the copyright holder (original author), cannot be used for any commercial purposes, and may not be altered. Any other use would require the permission of the copyright holder. Students may inquire about withdrawing their dissertation and/or thesis from this database. For additional inquiries, please contact the repository administrator via email ([email protected]) or by telephone at 519-253-3000ext. 3208. THE ROLE OF BOHDAN KHMELNYTSKYI AND OF THE KOZAKS IN THE RUSIN STRUGGLE FOR INDEPENDENCE FROM THE POLISH-LI'THUANIAN COMMONWEALTH: 1648-1649 by A ‘n d r e w B. Pernal, B. A. A Thesis Submitted to the Department of History of the University of Windsor in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Faculty of Graduate Studies 1967 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
  • Seminars in History of Ukraine: Methodological Guidelines for English-Speaking Students

    Seminars in History of Ukraine: Methodological Guidelines for English-Speaking Students

    MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF UKRAINE NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY «KHARKIV POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE» SEMINARS IN HISTORY OF UKRAINE: METHODOLOGICAL GUIDELINES FOR ENGLISH-SPEAKING STUDENTS Approved by the Editorial-Publishing Council of the NTU «KhPI» Minutes № 2 of May 24, 2018 Kharkiv NTU «KhPI» 2018 Cемінарські заняття з історії України: Методичні вказівки для англомовних студентів / уклад. Є.К.Шишкіна. – Харків : НТУ «ХПІ», 2017. – 37 с. Seminars in History of Ukraine: Methodological Guidelines for English-Speaking Students / ed. Y. K. Shyshkina. – Kharkiv : NTU «KPI», 2017. – 37 p. Укладач Є.К.Шишкіна Рецензент І.В.Дворкін Кафедра політичної історії 2 Foreword The subject of the academic discipline is the basic processes of the Ukrainian national and state building, political, socio-economic and national-cultural changes, which took place in the past of the Ukrainian nation. The goals of the discipline are to improve the students' comprehension of the native history, explain the causes and consequences of political, socio-economic and national-cultural transformations that took place in different periods of Ukrainian history. During the process of learning students get the necessary knowledge of: – political and administrative organization of the Ukrainian lands in different historical periods; – different forms and basic elements of the Ukrainian statehood; – chronology of historical events; – reasons, course, consequences of political, socio-economic and national- cultural events, phenomena, processes on the territory of
  • Nikolaj Von Wassilko. Bukovinian Statesman and Diplomat

    Nikolaj Von Wassilko. Bukovinian Statesman and Diplomat

    https://doi.org/10.4316/CC.2019.01.010 POLITICS AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES NIKOLAJ VON WASSILKO. BUKOVINIAN STATESMAN AND DIPLOMAT Oleksandr DOBRZHANSKYI Yurii Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University (Ukraine) E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: The article is dedicated to the study of the political biography of Nikolaj von Wassilko, a well-known Bukovinian leader, one of the most controversial personages among Ukrainian politicians of Austria-Hungary at the end of the 19th – the beginning of the 20th century. It is worth mentioning that many scientists from various countries wrote about N. Wassilko, but separate studies about his life and political activities have not been written yet. Author paid considerable attention to the formation of N. Wassilko's political views, the evolution of his preferences from conservative Rusynism and Moscophilia philosophy to the populistic doctrine. Since the beginning of the 20th century, N. Wassilko became almost the sole leader of Ukrainians in Bukovina. The article presents the analysis of his activities in the Austrian Parliament, the Diet of Bukovina, public organizations, and his initiatives to resolve various regional issues. His activities in the years of World War I were equally rich. In particular, the article shows his diplomatic activities as the ambassador of the ZUNR (West Ukrainian People's Republic) in Vienna, the ambassador of the UPR (Ukrainian People's Republic) in Switzerland and other countries. At the end of the research, the author points out the remarkable path of N. Wassilko in the history of the Ukrainian movement in Bukovina in the early twentieth century, as one of the central figures of the Ukrainian diplomacy during 1918-1924.
  • The History of Ukraine Advisory Board

    The History of Ukraine Advisory Board

    THE HISTORY OF UKRAINE ADVISORY BOARD John T. Alexander Professor of History and Russian and European Studies, University of Kansas Robert A. Divine George W. Littlefield Professor in American History Emeritus, University of Texas at Austin John V. Lombardi Professor of History, University of Florida THE HISTORY OF UKRAINE Paul Kubicek The Greenwood Histories of the Modern Nations Frank W. Thackeray and John E. Findling, Series Editors Greenwood Press Westport, Connecticut • London Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Kubicek, Paul. The history of Ukraine / Paul Kubicek. p. cm. — (The Greenwood histories of the modern nations, ISSN 1096 –2095) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978 – 0 –313 – 34920 –1 (alk. paper) 1. Ukraine —History. I. Title. DK508.51.K825 2008 947.7— dc22 2008026717 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data is available. Copyright © 2008 by Paul Kubicek All rights reserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced, by any process or technique, without the express written consent of the publisher. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 2008026717 ISBN: 978– 0– 313 – 34920 –1 ISSN: 1096 –2905 First published in 2008 Greenwood Press, 88 Post Road West, Westport, CT 06881 An imprint of Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc. www.greenwood.com Printed in the United States of America The paper used in this book complies with the Permanent Paper Standard issued by the National Information Standards Organization (Z39.48 –1984). 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Every reasonable effort has been made to trace the owners of copyright materials in this book, but in some instances this has proven impossible.
  • Moldova, Moldavia, Bessarabia Yefim Kogan, 25 September 2015

    Moldova, Moldavia, Bessarabia Yefim Kogan, 25 September 2015

    Moldova, Moldavia, Bessarabia Yefim Kogan, 25 September 2015 Dear Researchers, I have received recently an email from Marilyn Newman: Hello Yefim, I've been following this project and appreciate your more complete break down in today's Jewishgen Digest. I did contribute to Bob Wascou before he passed. The reason for this message is that I'm confused. My family were from Moinesti and Tirgu Ocna, both near each other in Moldova. However, this area was not Bessarabia..... Can you explain what areas of Moldova are covered other than Bessarabia and Chisanou (sp.). Many Thanks, Marilyn Newman Marilyn thank you. I think this is a very important question. I was getting many similar message for many years. Let’s clear this confusion. Let's start with terminology. The term Moldavia and Moldova mean the same region! Moldova is in Romanian language and Moldavia was adopted by Russian and other languages, including English. Charles King in 'The Moldovans. Romania, Russia, and the Politics of Culture', Stanford U., 1999 writes that 'It is a myth that Moldova changed its name from Moldavia. What happened in the 1990s was simply that we in the West became better informed about what locals themselves had always called it.' So let's dive into the history of the region: Moldavia is known as a country or Principality from 14 century until 1812. There were also two other Danube or Romanian Principalities - Walachia and Transilvania. At some point in the history Moldavia joined other Principalities. In 1538 Moldavia surrendered to Ottoman Empire, and remained under Turks for about 300 years.
  • The Jews of Ukraine and Moldova

    The Jews of Ukraine and Moldova

    CHAPTER ONE THE JEWS OF UKRAINE AND MOLDOVA by Professor Zvi Gitelman HISTORICAL BACKGROUND A hundred years ago, the Russian Empire contained the largest Jewish community in the world, numbering about 5 million people. More than 40 percent—2 million of them—lived in Ukraine SHIFTING SOVEREIGNTIES and Bessarabia (the latter territory was subsequently divided Nearly a thousand years ago, Moldova was populated by a between the present-day Ukraine and Moldova; here, for ease Romanian-speaking people, descended from Romans, who of discussion, we use the terms “Bessarabia” and “Moldova” intermarried with the indigenous Dacians. A principality was interchangeably). Some 1.8 million lived in Ukraine (west of established in the territory in the fourteenth century, but it the Dniepr River) and in Bessarabia, and 387,000 made their did not last long. Moldova then became a tributary state of homes in Ukraine (east of the Dniepr), including Crimea. the Ottoman Empire, which lost parts of it to the Russian Thousands of others lived in what was called Eastern Galicia— Empire in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. now Western Ukraine. After the 1917 Russian Revolution, part of Moldova lay Today the Jewish population of those areas is much reduced, within the borders of Romania. Eventually part of it became due to the cumulative and devastating impacts of World War I, the Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic (SSR) of Moldavia, the 1917 Russian Revolution, World War II and the Holocaust, a unit within the larger Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic. massive emigration since the 1970s, and a natural decrease In August 1940, as Eastern Europe was being carved up resulting from a very low birth rate and a high mortality rate.
  • Contours and Consequences of the Lexical Divide in Ukrainian

    Contours and Consequences of the Lexical Divide in Ukrainian

    Geoffrey Hull and Halyna Koscharsky1 Contours and Consequences of the Lexical Divide in Ukrainian When compared with its two large neighbours, Russian and Polish, the Ukrainian language presents a picture of striking internal variation. Not only are Ukrainian dialects more mutually divergent than those of Polish or of territorially more widespread Russian,2 but on the literary level the language has long been characterized by the existence of two variants of the standard which have never been perfectly harmonized, in spite of the efforts of nationalist writers for a century and a half. While Ukraine’s modern standard language is based on the eastern dialect of the Kyiv-Poltava-Kharkiv triangle, the literary Ukrainian cultivated by most of the diaspora communities continues to follow to a greater or lesser degree the norms of the Lviv koiné in 1 The authors would like to thank Dr Lance Eccles of Macquarie University for technical assistance in producing this paper. 2 De Bray (1969: 30-35) identifies three main groups of Russian dialects, but the differences are the result of internal evolutionary divergence rather than of external influences. The popular perception is that Russian has minimal dialectal variation compared with other major European languages. Maximilian Fourman (1943: viii), for instance, told students of Russian that the language ‘is amazingly uniform; the same language is spoken over the vast extent of the globe where the flag of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics flies; and you will be understood whether you are speaking to a peasant or a university professor. There are no dialects to bother you, although, of course, there are parts of the Soviet Union where Russian may be spoken rather differently, as, for instance, English is spoken differently by a Londoner, a Scot, a Welshman, an Irishman, or natives of Yorkshire or Cornwall.
  • Names in Multi-Lingual, -Cultural and -Ethic Contact

    Names in Multi-Lingual, -Cultural and -Ethic Contact

    Oliviu Felecan, Romania 399 Romanian-Ukrainian Connections in the Anthroponymy of the Northwestern Part of Romania Oliviu Felecan Romania Abstract The first contacts between Romance speakers and the Slavic people took place between the 7th and the 11th centuries both to the North and to the South of the Danube. These contacts continued through the centuries till now. This paper approaches the Romanian – Ukrainian connection from the perspective of the contemporary names given in the Northwestern part of Romania. The linguistic contact is very significant in regions like Maramureş and Bukovina. We have chosen to study the Maramureş area, as its ethnic composition is a very appropriate starting point for our research. The unity or the coherence in the field of anthroponymy in any of the pilot localities may be the result of the multiculturalism that is typical for the Central European area, a phenomenon that is fairly reflected at the linguistic and onomastic level. Several languages are used simultaneously, and people sometimes mix words so that speakers of different ethnic origins can send a message and make themselves understood in a better way. At the same time, there are common first names (Adrian, Ana, Daniel, Florin, Gheorghe, Maria, Mihai, Ştefan) and others borrowed from English (Brian Ronald, Johny, Nicolas, Richard, Ray), Romance languages (Alessandro, Daniele, Anne, Marie, Carlos, Miguel, Joao), German (Adolf, Michaela), and other languages. *** The first contacts between the Romance natives and the Slavic people took place between the 7th and the 11th centuries both to the North and to the South of the Danube. As a result, some words from all the fields of onomasiology were borrowed, and the phonological system was changed, once the consonants h, j and z entered the language.
  • Chapter 6 the UKRAINIAN FAMINE by Lyman H. Legters

    Chapter 6 the UKRAINIAN FAMINE by Lyman H. Legters

    Chapter 6 THE UKRAINIAN FAMINE by Lyman H. Legters On the eve of the Bolshevik Revolution, European In the mind of Stalin, the problem of the Social Democrats, including their Russian branch, held Ukrainian peasants who resisted collectivization generally to two items of received doctrinal wisdom was linked with the problem of Ukrainian that would bear ultimately on the calamity of the early nationalism. Collectivization was imposed on the 1930s in the Ukraine. One of these was the belief that Ukraine much faster than it was on other parts the rural agricultural economy, along with its associated of the Soviet Union. The resulting hardship in social order, was to undergo capitalist kinds of develop­ the Ukraine was deliberately intensified by a ment as a necessary prelude to the introduction of policy of unrelenting grain procurement. It was socialism in the countryside. That expectation could this procurement policy that transformed be traced directly back to Marx and Engels. The other hardship into catastrophe. Famine by itself is not belief had been fashioned more recently in the multina­ genocide, but the consequences of the policy were tional empires of Habsburg and Romanov and taught known and remedies were available. The that ethnic diversity, presumed to be a vestigial social evidence is quite powerful that the famine could fact that would eventually disappear, might be accom­ have been avoided, hence the argument turns on modated in a centralized political system by permitting, Stalin's intentions. perhaps even encouraging, cultural autonomy. 1 In the Russian case, the first of these propositions was confounded initially in two ways.
  • Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine

    Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine

    Syracuse University SURFACE Religion College of Arts and Sciences 2005 Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine Samuel D. Gruber United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/rel Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Gruber, Samuel D., "Jewish Cemeteries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine" (2005). Full list of publications from School of Architecture. Paper 94. http://surface.syr.edu/arc/94 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts and Sciences at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Religion by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JEWISH CEMETERIES, SYNAGOGUES, AND MASS GRAVE SITES IN UKRAINE United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad 2005 UNITED STATES COMMISSION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF AMERICA’S HERITAGE ABROAD Warren L. Miller, Chairman McLean, VA Members: Ned Bandler August B. Pust Bridgewater, CT Euclid, OH Chaskel Besser Menno Ratzker New York, NY Monsey, NY Amy S. Epstein Harriet Rotter Pinellas Park, FL Bingham Farms, MI Edgar Gluck Lee Seeman Brooklyn, NY Great Neck, NY Phyllis Kaminsky Steven E. Some Potomac, MD Princeton, NJ Zvi Kestenbaum Irving Stolberg Brooklyn, NY New Haven, CT Daniel Lapin Ari Storch Mercer Island, WA Potomac, MD Gary J. Lavine Staff: Fayetteville, NY Jeffrey L. Farrow Michael B. Levy Executive Director Washington, DC Samuel Gruber Rachmiel
  • NARRATING the NATIONAL FUTURE: the COSSACKS in UKRAINIAN and RUSSIAN ROMANTIC LITERATURE by ANNA KOVALCHUK a DISSERTATION Prese

    NARRATING the NATIONAL FUTURE: the COSSACKS in UKRAINIAN and RUSSIAN ROMANTIC LITERATURE by ANNA KOVALCHUK a DISSERTATION Prese

    NARRATING THE NATIONAL FUTURE: THE COSSACKS IN UKRAINIAN AND RUSSIAN ROMANTIC LITERATURE by ANNA KOVALCHUK A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Comparative Literature and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2017 DISSERTATION APPROVAL PAGE Student: Anna Kovalchuk Title: Narrating the National Future: The Cossacks in Ukrainian and Russian Romantic Literature This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the Department of Comparative Literature by: Katya Hokanson Chairperson Michael Allan Core Member Serhii Plokhii Core Member Jenifer Presto Core Member Julie Hessler Institutional Representative and Scott L. Pratt Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded June 2017 ii © 2017 Anna Kovalchuk iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Anna Kovalchuk Doctor of Philosophy Department of Comparative Literature June 2017 Title: Narrating the National Future: The Cossacks in Ukrainian and Russian Romantic Literature This dissertation investigates nineteenth-century narrative representations of the Cossacks—multi-ethnic warrior communities from the historical borderlands of empire, known for military strength, pillage, and revelry—as contested historical figures in modern identity politics. Rather than projecting today’s political borders into the past and proceeding from the claim that the Cossacks are either Russian or Ukrainian, this comparative project analyzes the nineteenth-century narratives that transform pre- national Cossack history into national patrimony. Following the Romantic era debates about national identity in the Russian empire, during which the Cossacks become part of both Ukrainian and Russian national self-definition, this dissertation focuses on the role of historical narrative in these burgeoning political projects.
  • Dniester Jews Between

    Dniester Jews Between

    PARALLEL RUPTURES: JEWS OF BESSARABIA AND TRANSNISTRIA BETWEEN ROMANIAN NATIONALISM AND SOVIET COMMUNISM, 1918-1940 BY DMITRY TARTAKOVSKY DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2009 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Mark D. Steinberg, Chair Professor Keith Hitchins Professor Diane P. Koenker Professor Harriet Murav Assistant Professor Eugene Avrutin Abstract ―Parallel Ruptures: Jews of Bessarabia and Transnistria between Romanian Nationalism and Soviet Communism, 1918-1940,‖ explores the political and social debates that took place in Jewish communities in Romanian-held Bessarabia and the Moldovan Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic during the interwar era. Both had been part of the Russian Pale of Settlement until its dissolution in 1917; they were then divided by the Romanian Army‘s occupation of Bessarabia in 1918 with the establishment of a well-guarded border along the Dniester River between two newly-formed states, Greater Romania and the Soviet Union. At its core, the project focuses in comparative context on the traumatic and multi-faceted confrontation with these two modernizing states: exclusion, discrimination and growing violence in Bessarabia; destruction of religious tradition, agricultural resettlement, and socialist re-education and assimilation in Soviet Transnistria. It examines also the similarities in both states‘ striving to create model subjects usable by the homeland, as well as commonalities within Jewish responses on both sides of the border. Contacts between Jews on either side of the border remained significant after 1918 despite the efforts of both states to curb them, thereby necessitating a transnational view in order to examine Jewish political and social life in borderland regions.