Paula Gladue

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

PGLADUE United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 2016082569555232 Insp_id Inspection Report Rhode Island Zoological Society Customer ID: 2245 1000 Elmwood Avenue Certificate: 15-C-0004 Providence, RI 02907 Site: 001 RHODE ISLAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY Type: ROUTINE INSPECTION Date: 29-JUL-2019 There were no non-compliant items identified during the inspection. NOTE - Exit briefing held 7/29/19 on-site with facility representative. Report delivered by email 7/29/19. *END OF REPORT* Prepared By: Date: GLADUE PAULA, V M D USDA, APHIS, Animal Care 29-JUL-2019 Title: VETERINARY MEDICAL OFFICER 1054 Received By: TIM FRENCH - DEPUTY DIRECTOR Date: Title: REPORT DELIVERED BY EMAIL 7/29/19 29-JUL-2019 Page 1 of 1 United States Department of Agriculture Customer: 2245 Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Inspection Date: 29-JUL-19 Species Inspected Cust No Cert No Site Site Name Inspection 2245 15-C-0004 001 RHODE ISLAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY 29-JUL-19 Count Scientific Name Common Name 000004 Acinonyx jubatus CHEETAH 000002 Ailurus fulgens RED PANDA 000003 Alouatta caraya BLACK HOWLER 000003 Ammotragus lervia BARBARY SHEEP 000005 Antilocapra americana PRONGHORN 000005 Arctictis binturong BINTURONG 000002 Artibeus jamaicensis JAMAICAN FRUIT-EATING BAT / JAMAICAN FRUIT BAT 000004 Atelerix albiventris FOUR-TOED HEDGEHOG (MOST COMMON PET HEDGEHOG) 000003 Bison bison AMERICAN BISON 000002 Bos taurus CATTLE / COW / OX / WATUSI 000003 Budorcas taxicolor TAKIN 000003 Callicebus donacophilus REED TITI 000001 Camelus dromedarius DROMEDARY CAMEL 000001 Canis rufus RED WOLF 000011 Capra hircus DOMESTIC GOAT 000003 Choloepus didactylus LINNAEUS'S TWO-TOED SLOTH 000004 Coendou prehensilis PREHENSILE-TAILED PORCUPINE 000002 Connochaetes taurinus BRINDLED WILDEBEEST 000006 Dasyprocta leporina BRAZILIAN AGOUTI 000002 Dasypus novemcinctus NINE-BANDED ARMADILLO 000002 Dendrolagus matschiei MATSCHIE'S TREE KANGAROO 000003 Didelphis virginiana VIRGINIA OPOSSUM 000002 Echinops telfairi LESSER MADAGASCAR HEDGEHOG TENREC 000003 Equus quagga BURCHELL’S / GRANT’S / CHAPMAN’S / PLAINS ZEBRA 000002 Erethizon dorsatum NORTH AMERICAN PORCUPINE 000001 Euphractus sexcinctus YELLOW ARMADILLO 000004 Giraffa camelopardalis GIRAFFE 000003 Lama pacos ALPACA 000002 Leontopithecus rosalia GOLDEN LION TAMARIN 000004 Lontra canadensis NORTH AMERICAN RIVER OTTER 000003 Loxodonta africana AFRICAN ELEPHANT 000001 Mephitis mephitis STRIPED SKUNK 000002 Muntiacus reevesi REEVE'S MUNTJAC 000003 Mustela putorius EUROPEAN POLECAT 000002 Myrmecophaga tridactyla GIANT ANTEATER 000002 Nomascus leucogenys WHITE-CHEEKED GIBBON 000003 Notamacropus rufogriseus BENNETT'S WALLABY / RED-NECKED WALLABY 000006 Oryctolagus cuniculus DOMESTIC RABBIT / EUROPEAN RABBIT 000005 Ovis aries aries SHEEP INCLUDING ALL DOMESTIC BREEDS 000001 Phoca vitulina HARBOR SEAL Page 1 of 2 United States Department of Agriculture Customer: 2245 Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Inspection Date: 29-JUL-19 Species Inspected Cust No Cert No Site Site Name Inspection 2245 15-C-0004 001 RHODE ISLAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY 29-JUL-19 Count Scientific Name Common Name 000004 Pithecia pithecia WHITE-FACED SAKI 000002 Potamochoerus porcus RED RIVER HOG 000001 Potos flavus KINKAJOU 000002 Pteronura brasiliensis GIANT OTTER 000002 Saguinus bicolor BARE-FACED TAMARIN 000001 Saguinus oedipus COTTON-TOP TAMARIN 000003 Sus scrofa domestica DOMESTIC PIG / POTBELLY PIG / MICRO PIG 000039 Sylvilagus transitionalis NEW ENGLAND COTTONTAIL RABBIT 000001 Tamandua tetradactyla SOUTHERN TAMANDUA 000002 Uncia uncia SNOW LEOPARD 000002 Ursus thibetanus ASIATIC BLACK BEAR 000182 Total Page 2 of 2.
Recommended publications
  • Tanganyika Wildlife Park L L C Customer ID: 324586 1037 So 183Rd St W Certificate: 48-C-0156 GODDARD, KS 67052 Site: 001 Tanganyika Wildlife Park L L C

    Tanganyika Wildlife Park L L C Customer ID: 324586 1037 So 183Rd St W Certificate: 48-C-0156 GODDARD, KS 67052 Site: 001 Tanganyika Wildlife Park L L C

    United States Department of Agriculture MSHAVER Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 2016090000638385 Insp_id Inspection Report Tanganyika Wildlife Park L L C Customer ID: 324586 1037 So 183rd St W Certificate: 48-C-0156 GODDARD, KS 67052 Site: 001 Tanganyika Wildlife Park L L C Type: ROUTINE INSPECTION Date: 21-JUN-2021 2.131(b)(1) Critical Handling of animals. This licensee made available for transport to another licensed facility three Eurasian Lynx kittens under 28 days of age. The Certificate of Veterinary Inspection (CVI) shows an inspection date of 5/4/2020 with the kittens at 18 days of age. The shipping date on the CVI matches the APHIS 7020 form provided by the licensee showing a transport date of 5/6/2020. Neonatal nondomestic cats have special handing and husbandry needs and are placed in danger when they are exposed to members of the public and/or stressful conditions, including transportation. Cubs under 4 weeks of age (28 days) do not have a developed immune system, are susceptible to a wide variety of diseases including those of domestic cats, and cannot thermoregulate. The licensee must ensure that handling of all animals be done as expeditiously and carefully as possible in a manner that does not cause trauma, overheating, excessive cooling, behavioral stress, phy sical harm, or unnecessary discomfort. To be corrected from this day forward. This inspection and exit interview were conducted with facility representatives. Additional Inspectors: MICHAEL TYGART, VETERINARY MEDICAL OFFICEREnd Section Prepared By: MARGARET
  • PDF File Containing Table of Lengths and Thicknesses of Turtle Shells And

    PDF File Containing Table of Lengths and Thicknesses of Turtle Shells And

    Source Species Common name length (cm) thickness (cm) L t TURTLES AMNH 1 Sternotherus odoratus common musk turtle 2.30 0.089 AMNH 2 Clemmys muhlenbergi bug turtle 3.80 0.069 AMNH 3 Chersina angulata Angulate tortoise 3.90 0.050 AMNH 4 Testudo carbonera 6.97 0.130 AMNH 5 Sternotherus oderatus 6.99 0.160 AMNH 6 Sternotherus oderatus 7.00 0.165 AMNH 7 Sternotherus oderatus 7.00 0.165 AMNH 8 Homopus areolatus Common padloper 7.95 0.100 AMNH 9 Homopus signatus Speckled tortoise 7.98 0.231 AMNH 10 Kinosternon subrabum steinochneri Florida mud turtle 8.90 0.178 AMNH 11 Sternotherus oderatus Common musk turtle 8.98 0.290 AMNH 12 Chelydra serpentina Snapping turtle 8.98 0.076 AMNH 13 Sternotherus oderatus 9.00 0.168 AMNH 14 Hardella thurgi Crowned River Turtle 9.04 0.263 AMNH 15 Clemmys muhlenbergii Bog turtle 9.09 0.231 AMNH 16 Kinosternon subrubrum The Eastern Mud Turtle 9.10 0.253 AMNH 17 Kinixys crosa hinged-back tortoise 9.34 0.160 AMNH 18 Peamobates oculifers 10.17 0.140 AMNH 19 Peammobates oculifera 10.27 0.140 AMNH 20 Kinixys spekii Speke's hinged tortoise 10.30 0.201 AMNH 21 Terrapene ornata ornate box turtle 10.30 0.406 AMNH 22 Terrapene ornata North American box turtle 10.76 0.257 AMNH 23 Geochelone radiata radiated tortoise (Madagascar) 10.80 0.155 AMNH 24 Malaclemys terrapin diamondback terrapin 11.40 0.295 AMNH 25 Malaclemys terrapin Diamondback terrapin 11.58 0.264 AMNH 26 Terrapene carolina eastern box turtle 11.80 0.259 AMNH 27 Chrysemys picta Painted turtle 12.21 0.267 AMNH 28 Chrysemys picta painted turtle 12.70 0.168 AMNH 29
  • Jan 2021 ZSL Stocklist.Pdf (699.26

    Jan 2021 ZSL Stocklist.Pdf (699.26

    Zoological Society of London - January 2021 stocklist ZSL LONDON ZOO Status at 01.01.2021 m f unk Invertebrata Aurelia aurita * Moon jellyfish 0 0 150 Pachyclavularia violacea * Purple star coral 0 0 1 Tubipora musica * Organ-pipe coral 0 0 2 Pinnigorgia sp. * Sea fan 0 0 20 Sarcophyton sp. * Leathery soft coral 0 0 5 Sinularia sp. * Leathery soft coral 0 0 18 Sinularia dura * Cabbage leather coral 0 0 4 Sinularia polydactyla * Many-fingered leather coral 0 0 3 Xenia sp. * Yellow star coral 0 0 1 Heliopora coerulea * Blue coral 0 0 12 Entacmaea quadricolor Bladdertipped anemone 0 0 1 Epicystis sp. * Speckled anemone 0 0 1 Phymanthus crucifer * Red beaded anemone 0 0 11 Heteractis sp. * Elegant armed anemone 0 0 1 Stichodactyla tapetum Mini carpet anemone 0 0 1 Discosoma sp. * Umbrella false coral 0 0 21 Rhodactis sp. * Mushroom coral 0 0 8 Ricordea sp. * Emerald false coral 0 0 19 Acropora sp. * Staghorn coral 0 0 115 Acropora humilis * Staghorn coral 0 0 1 Acropora yongei * Staghorn coral 0 0 2 Montipora sp. * Montipora coral 0 0 5 Montipora capricornis * Coral 0 0 5 Montipora confusa * Encrusting coral 0 0 22 Montipora danae * Coral 0 0 23 Montipora digitata * Finger coral 0 0 6 Montipora foliosa * Hard coral 0 0 10 Montipora hodgsoni * Coral 0 0 2 Pocillopora sp. * Cauliflower coral 0 0 27 Seriatopora hystrix * Bird nest coral 0 0 8 Stylophora sp. * Cauliflower coral 0 0 1 Stylophora pistillata * Pink cauliflower coral 0 0 23 Catalaphyllia jardinei * Elegance coral 0 0 4 Euphyllia ancora * Crescent coral 0 0 4 Euphyllia glabrescens * Joker's cap coral 0 0 2 Euphyllia paradivisa * Branching frog spawn 0 0 3 Euphyllia paraancora * Branching hammer coral 0 0 3 Euphyllia yaeyamaensis * Crescent coral 0 0 4 Plerogyra sinuosa * Bubble coral 0 0 1 Duncanopsammia axifuga + Coral 0 0 2 Tubastraea sp.
  • Habitat Preference and Activity Pattern of the Pygmy Hippopotamus Analyzed by Camera Trapping and GIS

    Habitat Preference and Activity Pattern of the Pygmy Hippopotamus Analyzed by Camera Trapping and GIS

    Habitat preference and activity pattern of the pygmy hippopotamus analyzed by camera trapping and GIS Student: Henk Eshuis (Msc Forest and Nature Conservation, Wageningen University) Supervisors: Dr. P. van Hooft (Resource Ecology Group, Wageningen University) Assoc Prof. M.C.J. Paris (Institute for Breeding Rare and Endangered African Mammals; IBREAM (www.ibream.org) For further enquiries contact [email protected]) Habitat preference and activity pattern of the pygmy hippopotamus analyzed by camera trapping and GIS Submitted: 03-11-2011 REG-80439 Student: Henk Eshuis (Msc Forest and Nature Conservation, Wageningen University) 850406229010 Supervisors: Dr. P. van Hooft (Resource Ecology Group, Wageningen University) Assoc prof. M.C.J. Paris (Institute for Breeding Rare and Endangered African Mammals; IBREAM, www.ibream.org) Abstract The pygmy hippopotamus (Choeropsis liberiensis) is an elusive and endangered species that only occurs in West Africa. Not much is known about the habitat preference and activity pattern of this species. We performed a camera trapping study and collected locations of pygmy hippo tracks in Taï National Park, Ivory Coast, to determine this more in detail. In total 1785 trap nights were performed with thirteen recordings of pygmy hippo on ten locations. In total 159 signs of pygmy hippo were found. We analyzed the habitat preferences with a normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) from satellite images, distance to rivers and clustering using GIS. The NDVI indicates that pygmy hippos are mostly found in a wetter vegetation type. Most tracks we found in the first 250 m from a river and the tracks show significant clustering. These observations indicate that the pygmy hippopotamus prefers relatively wet vegetation close to rivers.
  • Mixed-Species Exhibits with Pigs (Suidae)

    Mixed-Species Exhibits with Pigs (Suidae)

    Mixed-species exhibits with Pigs (Suidae) Written by KRISZTIÁN SVÁBIK Team Leader, Toni’s Zoo, Rothenburg, Luzern, Switzerland Email: [email protected] 9th May 2021 Cover photo © Krisztián Svábik Mixed-species exhibits with Pigs (Suidae) 1 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 3 Use of space and enclosure furnishings ................................................................... 3 Feeding ..................................................................................................................... 3 Breeding ................................................................................................................... 4 Choice of species and individuals ............................................................................ 4 List of mixed-species exhibits involving Suids ........................................................ 5 LIST OF SPECIES COMBINATIONS – SUIDAE .......................................................... 6 Sulawesi Babirusa, Babyrousa celebensis ...............................................................7 Common Warthog, Phacochoerus africanus ......................................................... 8 Giant Forest Hog, Hylochoerus meinertzhageni ..................................................10 Bushpig, Potamochoerus larvatus ........................................................................ 11 Red River Hog, Potamochoerus porcus ...............................................................
  • List of 28 Orders, 129 Families, 598 Genera and 1121 Species in Mammal Images Library 31 December 2013

    List of 28 Orders, 129 Families, 598 Genera and 1121 Species in Mammal Images Library 31 December 2013

    What the American Society of Mammalogists has in the images library LIST OF 28 ORDERS, 129 FAMILIES, 598 GENERA AND 1121 SPECIES IN MAMMAL IMAGES LIBRARY 31 DECEMBER 2013 AFROSORICIDA (5 genera, 5 species) – golden moles and tenrecs CHRYSOCHLORIDAE - golden moles Chrysospalax villosus - Rough-haired Golden Mole TENRECIDAE - tenrecs 1. Echinops telfairi - Lesser Hedgehog Tenrec 2. Hemicentetes semispinosus – Lowland Streaked Tenrec 3. Microgale dobsoni - Dobson’s Shrew Tenrec 4. Tenrec ecaudatus – Tailless Tenrec ARTIODACTYLA (83 genera, 142 species) – paraxonic (mostly even-toed) ungulates ANTILOCAPRIDAE - pronghorns Antilocapra americana - Pronghorn BOVIDAE (46 genera) - cattle, sheep, goats, and antelopes 1. Addax nasomaculatus - Addax 2. Aepyceros melampus - Impala 3. Alcelaphus buselaphus - Hartebeest 4. Alcelaphus caama – Red Hartebeest 5. Ammotragus lervia - Barbary Sheep 6. Antidorcas marsupialis - Springbok 7. Antilope cervicapra – Blackbuck 8. Beatragus hunter – Hunter’s Hartebeest 9. Bison bison - American Bison 10. Bison bonasus - European Bison 11. Bos frontalis - Gaur 12. Bos javanicus - Banteng 13. Bos taurus -Auroch 14. Boselaphus tragocamelus - Nilgai 15. Bubalus bubalis - Water Buffalo 16. Bubalus depressicornis - Anoa 17. Bubalus quarlesi - Mountain Anoa 18. Budorcas taxicolor - Takin 19. Capra caucasica - Tur 20. Capra falconeri - Markhor 21. Capra hircus - Goat 22. Capra nubiana – Nubian Ibex 23. Capra pyrenaica – Spanish Ibex 24. Capricornis crispus – Japanese Serow 25. Cephalophus jentinki - Jentink's Duiker 26. Cephalophus natalensis – Red Duiker 1 What the American Society of Mammalogists has in the images library 27. Cephalophus niger – Black Duiker 28. Cephalophus rufilatus – Red-flanked Duiker 29. Cephalophus silvicultor - Yellow-backed Duiker 30. Cephalophus zebra - Zebra Duiker 31. Connochaetes gnou - Black Wildebeest 32. Connochaetes taurinus - Blue Wildebeest 33. Damaliscus korrigum – Topi 34.
  • CBD Fourth National Report

    CBD Fourth National Report

    The State of Eritrea Ministry of Land, Water and Environment Department of Environment The 4th National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity Asmara-Eritrea July, 2010 Table of Content ACRONYMS.................................................................................................................................................IV EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........................................................................................................................VI CHAPTER I. OVERVIEW OF BIODIVERSITY STATUS, TREND AND THREATS ......................... 1 1.1 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1.1 Introduction............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.2 Geographical Location and Climate......................................................................................... 2 1.2 OVERVIEW OF ERITREA’S BIODIVERSITY ........................................................................................ 3 1.3 BIODIVERSITY STATUS, TRENDS AND THREAT UNDER DIFFERENT BIOME/ECOSYSTEMS................ 5 1.3.1 Terrestrial Biodiversity............................................................................................................. 5 1.3.1.1 Forest Ecosystem ............................................................................................................................5 1.3.1.2 Woodland Ecosystem ...................................................................................................................11
  • Eastern Afromontane Biodiversity Hotspot

    Eastern Afromontane Biodiversity Hotspot

    Ecosystem Profile EASTERN AFROMONTANE BIODIVERSITY HOTSPOT FINAL VERSION 24 JANUARY 2012 Prepared by: BirdLife International with the technical support of: Conservation International / Science and Knowledge Division IUCN Global Species Programme – Freshwater Unit IUCN –Eastern Africa Plant Red List Authority Saudi Wildlife Authority Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Centre for Middle Eastern Plants The Cirrus Group UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre WWF - Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Programme Office Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund And support from the International Advisory Committee Neville Ash, UNEP Division of Environmental Policy Implementation; Elisabeth Chadri, MacArthur Foundation; Fabian Haas, International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology; Matthew Hall, Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Centre for Middle Eastern Plants; Sam Kanyamibwa, Albertine Rift Conservation Society; Jean-Marc Froment, African Parks Foundation; Kiunga Kareko, WWF, Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Programme Office; Karen Laurenson, Frankfurt Zoological Society; Leo Niskanen, IUCN Eastern & Southern Africa Regional Programme; Andy Plumptre, Wildlife Conservation Society; Sarah Saunders, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds; Lucy Waruingi, African Conservation Centre. Drafted by the ecosystem profiling team: Ian Gordon, Richard Grimmett, Sharif Jbour, Maaike Manten, Ian May, Gill Bunting (BirdLife International) Pierre Carret, Nina Marshall, John Watkin (CEPF) Naamal de Silva, Tesfay Woldemariam, Matt Foster (Conservation International)
  • Rarity, Trophy Hunting and Ungulates L

    Rarity, Trophy Hunting and Ungulates L

    Animal Conservation. Print ISSN 1367-9430 Rarity, trophy hunting and ungulates L. Palazy1,2, C. Bonenfant1, J. M. Gaillard1 & F. Courchamp2 1 Biometrie´ et Biologie E´ volutive, Villeurbanne, France 2 Ecologie, Systematique´ et Evolution, Orsay, France Keywords Abstract anthropogenic Allee effect; conservation; hunting management; trophy price; The size and shape of a trophy constitute major determinants of its value. mammals. We postulate that the rarity of a species, whatever its causes, also plays a major role in determining its value among hunters. We investigated a role for an Correspondence Anthropogenic Allee effect in trophy hunting, where human attraction to rarity Lucille Palazy. Current address: UMR CNRS could lead to an over-exploitative chain reaction that could eventually drive the 5558, Univ Lyon 1, 43 bd 11 nov, 69622 targeted species to extinction. We performed an inter-specific analysis of trophy Villeurbanne cedex, France. prices of 202 ungulate taxa and quantified to what extent morphological char- Tel: +33 4.72.43.29.35 acteristics and their rarity accounted for the observed variation in their price. We Email: [email protected] found that once location and body mass were accounted for, trophies of rare species attain higher prices than those of more common species. By driving trophy Editor: Iain Gordon price increase, this rarity effect may encourage the exploitation of rare species Associate Editor: John Linnell regardless of their availability, with potentially profound consequences for populations. Received 24 January 2011; accepted 16 May 2011 doi:10.1111/j.1469-1795.2011.00476.x Introduction et al., 1997). Moreover, the current worldwide trend of increasing wealth, in particular in the Middle East, Russia Over-exploitation of natural resources by humans is one and China (Dubois & Laurent, 1998; Guriev & Rachinsky, of the main causes of the current and dramatic loss of 2009), is likely to be paralleled by a growth in demand for biodiversity (Kerr & Currie, 1995; Burney & Flannery, sport hunting.
  • Using Non-Invasive Faecal Hormone Metabolite Monitoring to Detect

    Using Non-Invasive Faecal Hormone Metabolite Monitoring to Detect

    Research article Using non-invasive faecal hormone metabolite monitoring to detect reproductive patterns, seasonality and pregnancy in red river hogs (Potamochoerus porcus) Jocelyn Bryant1, Nadja Wielebnowski2, Diane Gierhahn1, Tina Houchens1, Astrid Bellem1, Amy Roberts1 and Joan Daniels1 1 Chicago Zoological Society, Brookfield Zoo, Brookfield, Illinois, USA 2Oregon Zoo, Portland, Oregon, USA Correspondence: Jocelyn Bryant, Department of Conservation Science, Chicago Zoological Society, Brookfield Zoo, 3300 Golf Rd, Brookfield, IL 60513, USA; Jocelyn. [email protected] JZAR Research article Research JZAR Keywords: Abstract androgen, faecal hormone metabolite, Few studies have been conducted on red river hog (Potamochoerus porcus) reproductive biology in oestrous cycle, progesterone, porcine, zoos. Furthermore, in spite of regular breeding efforts in zoos, reproductive success has been relatively seasonality poor for this species, particularly in the North American population. In this study, we used faecal hormone metabolite monitoring to analyse near daily samples from two males and three females Article history: over several years to gain insight into their patterns of reproductive hormone secretion. Both a Received: 4 February 2015 progesterone and a testosterone enzyme immunoassay (EIA) were validated and subsequently used to Accepted: 15 January 2016 monitor reproductive patterns, seasonality, ovulatory activity and a successful pregnancy. The findings Published online: 31 January 2016 indicate that female red river hogs are seasonally polyoestrous. Regular cycles were observed from approximately December through August and an annual period of anoestrous was observed from approximately September until December. Average cycle length for all females was 23 days ± 1.19, range 13–30 days. Androgen excretion patterns of the two males did not show clear seasonal patterns.
  • Trophy Hunting, Size, Rarity and Willingness to Pay: Inter–Specific Analyses of Trophy Prices Require Reliable Specific Data

    Trophy Hunting, Size, Rarity and Willingness to Pay: Inter–Specific Analyses of Trophy Prices Require Reliable Specific Data

    Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 36.2 (2013) Forum165 Trophy hunting, size, rarity and willingness to pay: inter–specific analyses of trophy prices require reliable specific data M. Sarasa Sarasa, M., 2013. Trophy hunting, size, rarity and willingness to pay: inter–specific analyses of trophy prices require reliable specific data. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 36.2: 165–175. Abstract Trophy hunting, size, rarity and willingness to pay: inter–specific analyses of trophy prices require reliable specific data.— Awareness of the importance of the wildlife trade and human perception in animal conservation is growing. Recent studies carried out on a continental and world scale have analysed the associations between trophy score, rarity and prices. As a large range of ungulates are legally hunted throughout the world and numerous ungulate taxa are threatened, the relationship between rarity and trophy prices has been studied in several species. This article briefly reviews verifiable data on species and trophy prices and compares findings with data used in recent articles. The findings show that several elements of intra–specific data were inadequately addressed and that the trophy prices considered were not necessarily representative of real trophy prices. Furthermore, the body mass used for numer� ous taxa did not fit current knowledge of species, and several subspecies and rarity indexes that were considered disagreed with recognized subspecies or with the real conservation status of taxa. Thus, caution should be taken when considering some reported results. To improve our understanding of the associations between wildlife trade and wildlife conservation, further studies should take into account reliable specific data, such as that from government agencies, rather than publicity data.
  • CONSERVATION of the PYGMY HIPPOPOTAMUS (Choeropsis Liberiensis) in SIERRA

    CONSERVATION of the PYGMY HIPPOPOTAMUS (Choeropsis Liberiensis) in SIERRA

    CONSERVATION OF THE PYGMY HIPPOPOTAMUS (Choeropsis liberiensis) IN SIERRA LEONE, WEST AFRICA by APRIL LEANNE CONWAY (Under the Direction of John P. Carroll and Sonia M. Hernandez) ABSTRACT The pygmy hippopotamus (Choeropsis liberiensis, hereafter pygmy hippo) is an endangered species endemic to the Upper Guinea Rainforests of West Africa. Major threats to their continued survival include poaching for meat and deforestation. With increasing human populations and subsequent land use changes, pygmy hippo survival is far from certain. Understanding their ecology and behavior requires knowledge of the anthropogenic forces that influence them. I report on a study conducted on and around a protected area, Tiwai Island Wildlife Sanctuary, in southeastern Sierra Leone. The objective of this research was to explore local knowledge about pygmy hippos and human-wildlife interactions, test radio transmitter attachment methods, evaluate physical capture methods for radio transmitter attachment, and explore the use of camera trapping to determine occupancy and activity patterns of pygmy hippos. My results suggested that while the majority of local residents in the study area do not believe pygmy hippos have any benefits, environmental outreach may positively influence attitudes. Furthermore, the potential for using public citizens in scientific research facilitates exchange of knowledge. For radio telemetry transmitter attachment, I found that a hose-shaped collar was the best and caused minimal abrasion to the pygmy hippo. In the field, I attempted to physically capture pygmy hippos using pitfall traps, and successfully caught a male pygmy hippo in October 2010. However, more time is needed to capture multiple hippos. Camera trapping allowed for estimation of occupancy and activity patterns on Tiwai Island and the surrounding unprotected islands, and also recorded previously undocumented species in the area like the bongo Tragelaphus eurycerus.