DOCSLIB.ORG

Preliminary Ecological Appraisal 63 Wharf Road, Stanford Le Hope Client Name: Fastglobe Mastics Ltd Project Number: P4113.1.0 Date: 20 January 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Preliminary Ecological Appraisal 63 Wharf Road, Stanford Le Hope Client Name: Fastglobe Mastics Ltd Project Number: P4113.1.0 Date: 20 January 2021 Preliminary Ecological Appraisal 63 Wharf Road, Stanford Le Hope Client Name: Fastglobe Mastics Ltd Project Number: P4113.1.0 Date: 20 January 2021 Client Fastglobe Mastics Ltd Agent Third Dimension Site 63 Wharf Road, Stanford Le Hope Report reference P4113.1.0 Prepared by Ross Wotherspoon BSc (Hons) MSc, Ecologist and Charlotte Alanine BSc (Hons), Assistant Ecologist Reviewed by Sally Dalrymple-Smith MSc MCIEEM CEnv Approved by Richard Parmee BSc MSc Tech Cert (ArborA) MArborA Date 20 January 2021 Version Final agb Environmental Ltd has prepared this document in accordance with the instructions of their client, Fastglobe Mastics Ltd, for their sole and specific use and has been prepared based on a scope of works which has been agreed directly with the client. agb Environmental Ltd Terms and Conditions apply. © agb Environmental Ltd 2021 Newmarket Business Centre 341 Exning Road, Newmarket, CB8 0AT Tel: 01638 663226 www.agbenvironmental.co.uk agb Environmental Ltd agb Environmental Ltd 1 Summary Site 63 Wharf Road, Stanford Le Hope Central OS Grid Reference TQ 68722 82015 Report Commissioned by Third Dimension on behalf of Fastglobe Mastics Ltd Date of Survey 15th December 2020 Considerations Description Comments & Recommendations Fastglobe Mastics Ltd propose to demolish the existing Proposed Ecological input is required in support of a building on site and replace it Development planning application. with a number of retirement bungalows. Surveys A desk study and walkover Both surveys informed a Preliminary Undertaken survey. Ecological Appraisal (PEA). The site comprised buildings, The site was considered to be of negligible artificial sealed surfaces, importance due to the common habitat types Ecological modified grassland, bramble and poor plant diversity. Importance of the scrub, ruderal / ephemeral Site vegetation, introduced shrubs Mitigation to protect notable species / and scattered trees. habitats have been recommended. The Grove House Wood Local Nature Reserve (LNR) is located close to the Further application site and it is recommended that Assessments / Statutory sites plans for development consider the impacts Surveys of increased visitor pressure on the site. Consultation and mitigation may be required. Protect these features and replant any trees Trees lost to development with native species of local provenance. Clear any woody vegetation outside the nesting bird season, or after a nesting bird Nesting birds survey by an ecologist if clearance is scheduled between March and August (inclusive). A pre-construction badger check Badger approximately six weeks before construction starts is recommended. Avoidance and Provide hedgehog links within any new General Mitigation Hedgehog fencing. Precautionary strimming of grassland Reptiles habitat is recommended. Cotoneaster horizontalis on the southern Schedule 9 non-native boundary should be removed from site invasive species Cotoneaster carefully to an approved disposal facility, to sp. avoid its spread. Cover trenches or provide planked escape routes to allow any animals that fall in to Site measures escape. Store materials off the ground and do not leave temporary standing water. P4113.1.0 Preliminary Ecological Appraisal 20 January 2021 63 Wharf Road, Stanford Le Hope Page 2 of 37 agb Environmental Ltd Considerations Description Comments & Recommendations Examples of how BNG could be achieved include: balancing the number of houses, Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG) providing habitats such as wildflower meadows and wildlife ponds and linking Enhancements ecological corridors. Provide a Biodiversity Enhancement To increase the ecological Scheme (BES) that includes ecological value of the site. enhancements for the site. P4113.1.0 Preliminary Ecological Appraisal 20 January 2021 63 Wharf Road, Stanford Le Hope Page 3 of 37 agb Environmental Ltd Contents 1 Summary ........................................................................................................................ 2 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Background ............................................................................................................. 6 2.2 Site Location and Description .................................................................................. 6 2.3 Development Proposal ............................................................................................ 6 2.4 Scope of Survey ...................................................................................................... 6 2.5 Objective ................................................................................................................. 6 3 Methodology ................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Surveyor .................................................................................................................. 7 3.2 Desk Study .............................................................................................................. 7 3.3 Habitat Survey ......................................................................................................... 7 3.4 Protected and Notable Species Assessment ........................................................... 8 3.4.1 Amphibians ...................................................................................................... 8 3.4.2 Bats .................................................................................................................. 8 3.4.3 Badgers ............................................................................................................ 8 3.4.4 Birds (Nesting) ................................................................................................. 8 3.4.5 Hazel Dormouse .............................................................................................. 9 3.4.6 Reptiles ............................................................................................................ 9 3.4.7 Other Species .................................................................................................. 9 3.4.8 Invasive Species .............................................................................................. 9 3.5 Evaluation ............................................................................................................... 9 3.6 Limitations and Assumptions ................................................................................... 9 4 Results and Evaluation ................................................................................................. 11 4.1 Designated Sites ................................................................................................... 11 4.1.1 Statutory Sites ................................................................................................ 11 4.1.2 Non-Statutory Sites ........................................................................................ 11 4.2 Habitats ................................................................................................................. 12 4.2.1 Buildings ........................................................................................................ 13 4.2.2 Artificial Sealed Surfaces ............................................................................... 13 4.2.3 Modified Grassland ........................................................................................ 13 4.2.4 Bramble Scrub ............................................................................................... 14 4.2.5 Ruderal / Ephemeral Vegetation..................................................................... 15 4.2.6 Introduced Shrubs .......................................................................................... 15 4.2.7 Scattered Trees .............................................................................................. 16 4.3 Protected and Notable Species ............................................................................. 17 4.3.1 Amphibians .................................................................................................... 17 4.3.2 Badgers .......................................................................................................... 17 P4113.1.0 Preliminary Ecological Appraisal 20 January 2021 63 Wharf Road, Stanford Le Hope Page 4 of 37 agb Environmental Ltd 4.3.3 Bats ................................................................................................................ 17 4.3.4 Birds (Nesting) ............................................................................................... 20 4.3.5 Hazel Dormouse ............................................................................................ 20 4.3.6 Hedgehog ...................................................................................................... 20 4.3.7 Invertebrates .................................................................................................. 20 4.3.8 Reptiles .......................................................................................................... 21 4.3.9 Other Protected, Priority and Rare Species .................................................... 21 4.3.10 Invasive Plants ............................................................................................... 21 5 Recommendations ......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gec Esfid Final
    Gateway Energy Centre UNDERGROUND GGAS PIPELINE AND ASSOCIATED ABOVE GROUND INSTALLATION ENVIRONMENTAAL STATEMENT FURTHER INFORMATION DOCUMENT Prepared by July 2011 CONTENTS Page LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS PREFACE 1 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background to the ES FID 1 1.2 Relationship between the ES and ES FID 1 2 PLANNING AND ENERGY POLICY 5 2.1 Overview 5 3 GAS PIPELINE ROUTE AND AGI LOCATION SELECTION 7 3.1 Response to Thurrock Council 7 4 CONSTRUCTION METHODS AND OPERATION 9 4.1 Response to Oikos Storage Ltd (Agent: Adams Hendry) 9 5 LAND USE 10 5.1 Response to Shell (Agent: Jones Lang LeSalle) 10 6 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL 18 6.1 Response to Thurrock Council 18 7 LAND USE / GEOLOGY, HYDROLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY 24 7.1 Response to Thurrock Council 24 8 CULTURAL HERITAGE 24 8.1 Response to ECC (Historic Environment Branch) 24 9 INDIRECT / SECONDARY AND CUMULATIVE IMPACTS 25 9.1 Response to Thurrock Council 25 9.2 Update to the March 2011 ES Section 18 (Indirect / Secondary and Cumulative Impacts) 27 APPENDIX A REPRESENTATIONS MADE BY THRID PARTIES TO TTGDC APPENDIX B UPDATES TO MARCH 2011 ES SECTIONS 2 AND 3 APPENDIX C UPDATE TO MARCH 2011 ES SECTION 6 APPENDIX D SUBSTITUTION OF MARCH 2011 ES SECTION 15 APPENDIX E UPDATE TO MARCH 2011 ES SECTION 18 57 GEC Underground Gas Pipeline and Associated Above Ground Installation July 2011 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 3LPE 3 layer polyethylene AC Alternating Current ACC Air Cooled Condenser AGI Above Ground Installation AOD Above Ordnance Datum AUT Automatic Ultrasonic Testing BAP Biodiversity Action Plan BP British
    [Show full text]
  • Tilbury to Southend-On-Sea
    Coastal Access – Tilbury to Southend-on-Sea November 2020 Contents: 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 2. Background ........................................................................................................................... 1 3. Layout .................................................................................................................................... 1 4. Representations and Natural England’s comments on them ................................................. 2 5. Supporting documents ......................................................................................................... 15 1. Introduction This document records the representations Natural England has received on this compendium of reports from persons or bodies. It also sets out any Natural England comments on these representations. 2. Background Natural England’s compendium of reports setting out its proposals for improved access to the coast from Tilbury to Southend-on-Sea, comprising an overview and five separate length reports, was submitted to the Secretary of State on 27 February 2020. This began an eight- week period during which representations and objections about each constituent report could be made. In total, Natural England received nine representations pertaining to the Tilbury to Southend-on- Sea stretch, of which five were made by organisations or individuals whose representations must be sent in full to the Secretary
    [Show full text]
  • Stanford-Le-Hope to Pitsea
    A132 THE THAMES ESTUARY A13 LANGDON HILLS Stanford-le-Hope St. Michael’s Church, Pitsea Mount PATH ROUTES Vange Marsh TO BENFLEET 3 B1419 to Pitsea WWII Pillbox Pitsea Station H 10 mile walk between VANGE St. Margaret’s Church, Bowers Marsh TO STANFORD-LE-HOPE Basildon University Stanford-le-Hope and Pitsea Station. Pitsea Station Hospital A130 Some of the places of interest: HOPE’S GREEN Wat Tyler Country Park • Thurrock Thameside Nature Park • London Gateway Port B1006 VICARAGE HILL A13 HIGH ROAD • Stanford Warren Nature Reserve WWII Pillbox FOBBING • Corringham and Fobbing Marshes • Corringham Village • Vange Marshes Fobbing Marsh Nature Reserve • Vange Wick ESSEX WAY Wat Tyler Country Park Bower Marsh • Fobbing Village SOUTH BENFLEET B1420 Benfleet Station • Wat Tyler Country Park TO LEIGH-ON-SEA St Michael’s Church B1014 B SOUTHERN ROAD SP y R e b Imag A1014 St Mary the Virgin Church 4 Pitsea to Benfleet Stanford-le-Hope Station 3 ½ mile walk between Pitsea and • Pitsea Mount Church • Benfleet village and church Benfleet Station. • Wat Tyler Country Park • World War II Pillboxes STANFORD-LE-HOPE HORNDON ON THE HILLLondon Gateway Port • RSPB Bowers Marsh • St Micheal’s Church, Pitsea Mount Some of the places of interest: • Bowers Marsh Church • St Margaret’s Church, Bowers Marsh A128 TO EAST Stanford Wharf Nature Reserve TILBURY ~ RIVER THAMES ~ KING STREET Stanford-le-Hope Station STANFORD -LE-HOPE B1006 HADLEIGH A13 BENFLEET ROAD VICARAGE HILL Hadleigh Castle A13 ESSEX WAY BUCKINGHAM HILL ROAD HILL BUCKINGHAM TO PITSEA SOUTH BENFLEET BELTON WAY (W) LEIGH-ON-SEA Benfleet Station Hadleigh Country Park Leigh-on-Sea Station B1014 East Tilbury to TO PITSEA 2 Stanford-le-Hope 3½ mile walk between East Tilbury and Stanford le Hope Station.
    [Show full text]
  • Leighway Issue 51 New Year 2017
    1 LEIGHWAY ISSUE 51 NEW YEAR 2017 CONTENTS HAPPY 2017 Happy 2017/Subscriptions/Diary Dates 1 Is it really 17 years since we saw in the New Millennium—how time flies. Well here we are at the start of another New Year, with the hope that 2017 will be an even better year for the Society and the Heritage Centre than 2016. Harry Smith—Horticulturalist and Photographer 2/3 Small societies all over the country are struggling for membership and we, like them, are always looking for ways to enhance what we offer our members and keep you all interested in the aims and objectives of the Society. Is there a Doctor in the House/ Keeping the Memories/Leigh’s link to In 2016 we maintained our level of membership, which is excellent, and thanks go Dunkirk 3 to all of you who continue to support the work we do in the Heritage Centre and through our involvement in planning and local issues. Full Steam Ahead 4 This year we are going to be looking at ‘the way forward’ for the Society and Centre so that we can ensure its existence for many years to come. Latest Acquisitions 5 To kick this off we are adding to our meeting schedule by additional talks in June and September. The Churchyard Well/St Thomas’ Mission Then and Now/What a Load If any member has any ideas or suggestions for future events or activities please of Rubbish 6 drop Carole a line on [email protected]. SUBSCRIPTIONS Wesley Church Mural/Fishermen’s Start of a new year and, sorry folks, it means it is subs time.
    [Show full text]
  • Essexbirding
    ISSUE NO. 124 | SUMMER/AUTUMN 2014 | £5.00 ESSEXBIRDING BIRTHDAY6 EDITION 5 th • Birds of Prey Conference & Wildlife Exhibition update • The Scillies • Future Birdwatching at Abberton • Tollesbury Wick • Coloured rings on BH Gulls • Over at Vange Marsh • Belfairs EWT • Gujarat, India www.ebws.org.uk Registered Charity Number 1142734 EDITORIAL LESLEY COLLINS So, our first issue is out and we are still here! It was a more from Paul for a future edition. great moment seeing our efforts actually in print for We went on holiday early in May, staying with the first time, and our first feedback was a lovely relatives in North Cyprus for the first time, and of compliment; ‘the effort that you both have put into course we managed to book a couple of days with a the magazine certainly shows, keep up the good local guide to do some bird watching! We saw plenty work’. So we will endeavour to do just that. We will of birds, including 21 new ones for us, and my also ensure our contact details are actually listed in relatives enjoyed joining us and learning more about this issue, so that you can let us have any comments the birds they have been watching since they moved or thoughts! out there; maybe I will write our trip up for a future After reading my question asking about your edition of Essex Birding and share it with you. I favourite Essex places to watch birds, I had a message always enjoy reading where others have travelled, so to contact a lovely lady now living in Norfolk.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Spaces Strategy 2006-2011
    Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Scope of the Strategy 2 1.2 National Agenda for Higher Quality Open Space 2 1.3 Policy Context – National, Regional & Local 3 1.4 Summary 5 2. Profile of Thurrock 6 2.1 Natural Environment 6 2.2 Built Environment 11 2.3 Social-Economic and Demographic Profile 11 3. Research Processes 14 3.1 Why? 14 3.2 Audit of Provision 14 3.3 Community Consultation 16 3.4 Community Views 17 3.4.1 Opens Spaces for all 17 3.4.2 Community Concerns 18 3.5 Identifying Open Spaces for Improvement 20 4. Strategy Research 21 4.1 Parks & Gardens 21 4.2 Country Parks 28 4.3 Natural and Semi Natural Greenspace 29 4.4 Amenity Greenspace 33 4.5 Children’s Play Space 35 4.6 Outdoor Sport Facilities 41 4.7 Allotments 45 4.8 Cemeteries and Churchyards 48 4.9 Urban Space 50 5. Policies 51 5.1 Open Space Standards 52 5.2 Policy Recommendations 54 6. Recommendations 55 7. Making it Happen 55 7.1 Strategic Improvements 55 7.2 Community Involvement 56 7.3 Funding 57 References 58 Appendix 1: Background Research 59 Appendix 2: Converting Standards 59 Appendix 3: Funding 60 Appendix 4: Useful Contacts 72 Map Index Map 1 – Flood Zones 7 Map 2 – Nature Conservation Designations 10 Map 3 – Multiple Deprivation 13 Map 4 – Open Spaces in Thurrock 15 Map 5 – Areas Deficient in Parks and Gardens 27 Map 6 – Areas Deficient in Natural and Semi Natural Greenspace 32 Map 7 – Areas Deficient in Children’s Play Space 40 Map 8 – Areas Deficient in Allotments 47 Acknowledgement: Thurrock Council would like to Thank CABE (Commission for Architecture & the Built Environment) Space’s Enabling Programme for their support throughout the research and Strategy formulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Flood Risk Management Strategy, Appendix D2
    Thurrock Local Flood Risk Management Strategy – Strategic Environmental Assessment Scoping Report March 2015 Thurrock Council Civic Offices New Road Grays Essex RM17 6SL JBA Project Manager Claire Gardner JBA Consulting The Library St Philips Courtyard COLESHILL Warwickshire B46 3AD RH16 4NG Revision history Revision Ref / Date Issued Amendments Issued to Draft v0-2 / March 2015 Claire Gardner Final Thurrock Council Environment Agency Natural England English Heritage Contract This report describes work commissioned by Thurrock Council. Rachel Drabble and Laura Thomas of JBA Consulting carried out this work. Prepared by Rachel Drabble BSc (Hons) Environmental Consultant Reviewed by Laura Thomas BA MRes MCIEEM Senior Ecologist Purpose This document has been prepared as a SEA Scoping Report for Thurrock Council. JBA Consulting accepts no responsibility or liability for any use that is made of this document other than by the Client for the purposes for which it was originally commissioned and prepared. JBA Consulting has no liability regarding the use of this report except to Thurrock Council. 2014s1942 Thurrock LFRMS SEA Scoping Report v1.0.docx i Copyright © Jeremy Benn Associates Limited 2015 Carbon footprint A printed copy of the main text in this document will result in a carbon footprint of 223g if 100% post-consumer recycled paper is used and 283g if primary-source paper is used. These figures assume the report is printed in black and white on A4 paper and in duplex. JBA is aiming to reduce its per capita carbon emissions. 2014s1942 Thurrock LFRMS SEA Scoping Report v1.0.docx ii Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 The Local Flood Risk Management Strategy ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Thurrock Council As Part of the Development of Its Greengrid Strategy
    Appendix 1.2.13. INDEX 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 General Introduction 1 1.2 Background 3 2. OVERVIEW OF THURROCK 2.1 Recent Changes 5 2.2 Other Changes, Opportunities and Issues 6 2.3 BAP Resources Within Thurrock 6 2.3.1 Habitats 7 2.3.2 Species 14 2.3.3 Other BAP Issues 18 2.3.4 Summary of BAP Action Points 19 2.4 The Role of Local Wildlife Sites 20 2.5 Discussion of Local Wildlife Sites 21 2.6 Introduction to Wildlife Corridors 22 2.6.1 Corridor Requirements 23 2.6.2 Wildlife Corridors in Thurrock 26 2.6.3 Planning for the Future 28 References and Selected Bibliography Glossary of Abbreviations MAP1 Primary Corridors/Barriers Appendix 1 Development of Local Wildlife Site Selection Criteria In Essex Appendix 2 Species Indicative of Ancient Woodland In Essex Appendix 3 Species Indicative of Old, Unimproved Neutral/Acid Grassland and Marsh In Essex Appendix 4 Indicative Chalk Grassland Plants Appendix 5 Evolution of Local Nature Conservation Initiatives Appendix 6 Local Wildlife Sites Register Appendix 7 Tables and Maps of Potential Local Wildlife Sites Appendix 8 A Review Of Thurrock SSSIs Within The Local Wildlife Site Framework GREENGRID WILDLIFE STRATEGY FOR THURROCK 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 General Introduction Lying at the centre of the Thames Gateway, Thurrock is a key growth area that is set to undergo significant change. The next 15 years will see large numbers of additional houses plus development for employment. The protection and enhancement of those elements of the environment which give Thurrock its positive identity, including its ecological character, will be a critical aspect of the Greengrid and will influence the views of those who live and work in the area, as well as those passing through or considering investing.
    [Show full text]
  • South-East England: Lowestoft to Dungeness
    Coasts and seas of the United Kingdom Region 7 South-east England: Lowestoft to Dungeness edited by J.H. Barne, C.F. Robson, S.S. Kaznowska, J.P. Doody, N.C. Davidson & A.L. Buck Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House, City Road Peterborough PE1 1JY UK ©JNCC 1998 This volume has been produced by the Coastal Directories Project of the JNCC on behalf of the Project Steering Group. JNCC Coastal Directories Project Team Project directors Dr J.P. Doody, Dr N.C. Davidson Project management and co-ordination J.H. Barne, C.F. Robson Editing and publication S.S. Kaznowska, A.L. Buck Administration & editorial assistance J. Plaza, P.A. Smith, N.M. Stevenson The project receives guidance from a Steering Group which has more than 200 members. More detailed information and advice comes from the members of the Core Steering Group, which is composed as follows: Dr J.M. Baxter Scottish Natural Heritage R.J. Bleakley Department of the Environment, Northern Ireland R. Bradley The Association of Sea Fisheries Committees of England and Wales Dr J.P. Doody Joint Nature Conservation Committee B. Empson Environment Agency C. Gilbert Kent County Council & National Coasts and Estuaries Advisory Group N. Hailey English Nature Dr K. Hiscock Joint Nature Conservation Committee Prof. S.J. Lockwood Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Sciences C.R. Macduff-Duncan Esso UK (on behalf of the UK Offshore Operators Association) Dr D.J. Murison Scottish Office Agriculture, Environment & Fisheries Department Dr H.J. Prosser Welsh Office Dr J.S. Pullen WWF UK (Worldwide Fund for Nature) Dr P.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Essexbirding the Journal of the Essex Birdwatching Society Issue No
    ESSEXBIRDING THE JOURNAL OF THE ESSEX BIRDWATCHING SOCIETY ISSUE NO. 127 WINTER 2015/SPRING 2016 £5 www.ebws.org.uk Registered charity number 1142734 EBS Journal no127 pp.indd 1 19/1/16 09:22:22 Editorial Lesley Collinsn Where does the year go to, another New Year has hopeful that this will become a regular slot arrived and I hope your bird lists for 2016 are well from Simon. and truly started by now (if Steve has his way I know We are also pleased to announce that EBwS ours will be!) We have a poem in the topic of ‘listing’ members will be helping Jeff Martin with the Essex which I hope will make you smile. Tawny Owl Survey. We have a few details on page Profits from theConservation Event in March will 15 with more to appear on the website as we get be shared between The North Thames Gull Group them (Activities tab) we are also hoping for regular (NTGG) and Black-tailed Godwit colour ringing updates on this from Jeff. project. With that in mind Paul Roper has written a Never far away in any issue is a birding trip abroad, superb follow up from his article in Issue 124, so you and in this issue we have the continuation of John can see what great work they are doing at NTGG. and Diana Camp’s Falklands trip – every bit as This article updates on Black Headed, Herring and enjoyable as part 1. I have also had the time to write Lesser Black-backed Gulls, and in the next issue he up our Canada trip as promised – I left Steve to add will update on Great Black-back and Caspian and in all the birds we saw! It was lovely to recall the Yellow-legged Gulls.
    [Show full text]
  • OBJ/195 Essex County Council
    TRANSPORT AND WORKS ACT 1992 TRANSPORT AND WORKS ACT (APPLICATIONS AND OBJECTIONS PROCEDURE) RULES 2006 (SI 2006/1466) ESSEX COUNTY COUNCIL STATEMENT OF CASE IN RELATION TO THE APPLICATION FOR THE NETWORK RAIL (ESSEX AND OTHERS CROSSING REDUCTION) TRANSPORT AND WORKS ACT 1992 ORDER. Introduction This statement provides Essex County Council’s (ECC) criteria for objecting to the Network Rail (Essex and others crossing reduction) Transport and Works Act 1992 Order (the Order). Structure of this Statement The appendix and references detailed in the Documents section comprise supporting documentation and website links including Network Rail’s (NR) consultation plans showing their proposals including alternative routes which have additionally been annotated with ECC comments, and separate ECC plans illustrating the negative effect of each closure proposal on the public’s access to and enjoyment of the surrounding Public Rights of Way (PROW) network and showing the status of the highways used for NR’s proposed alternative routes, as well as other relevant documentation. ECC’s case is set out under a series of headings below. Objection to the granting of the Order In consideration of the closures presented in the Order ECC gave careful consideration to each proposal and undertook inspections of ten of the crossings proposed for closure as well as the proposed alternative routes* before reaching the decision to object to the nine proposed crossing closures at eight locations listed below, which were then formally adopted as ECC’s objections to specific crossing closures at a meeting of the full council. ECC also undertook Road Safety Assessments of the proposed road/verge alternatives proposed by the Order making authority, NR, who have advised that their own Road Safety Audits are to be provided by them as part of their Statement of Case and be available thereafter via DfT’s website.
    [Show full text]
  • Islington U3A Longer Walks Group
    Islington U3A Longer Walks Group Walk Title Stanford-le-Hope to Pitsea Walk No. 153 Area Essex Type Linear Date Tuesday 22nd August 2017 Distance 10 miles (16 km) including to/ from stations. Timing 5½ hours walking time + travel + lunch stop. Allow 8 hours in total. Should be back in Islington by 5.00 pm. Meeting up Meet at Fenchurch Street station (Bank end) at 9.30 to get the 9.41 & travel Shoeburyness train. Some might want to join at Upminster or Barking. Please advise me if you are doing any of those options. It’s Zone 6/ Freedom pass to Upminster so by a cheap day, off peak return Upminster to/from Pitsea. With a rail card that should be £7.00. Trains back from Pitsea are about every 15 minutes. Route This is another part of the Thames Estuary Path. We’ve previously done the section from Stanford-le-Hope going west to Tilbury. This time we start at Stanford but go east to Pitsea. See the “Links” for full details of the route. The highlights are: Leave Stanford-le-Hope station (0 mls, 10.30) and pick up the signs for the Path. We follow this until a junction – one branch to Tilbury, but we take the Pitsea branch. Soon we are in Stanford Wharf nature reserve. We zig zag through this countryside until we reach Corringham (5 mls, 12.30) and then soon we are at our lunchtime stop, a pub in Fobbing famous re the Peasants Revolt (5½ mls, 12.45). After lunch (13.45) and a quick look at the local church, we turn down Marsh Lane into our next nature reserve.
    [Show full text]