DOCSLIB.ORG

Liquid Scintillation Counting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Liquid Scintillation Counting Liquid Scintillation Counting As unstable nuclides spontaneously change into more stable species, they emit charged particles and/or electromagnetic radiation (Alpha particles, Beta particles (electrons), Gamma rays or X-rays). Gamma rays and X-rays are identical - the gamma ray originating from the nucleus and the X-ray from the orbital electrons. Nuclides that emit gamma or X-ray are best counted with solid crystal scintillator such as sodium iodide. Beta particles are best counted by liquid scintillation (LS) methods in which the nuclide is intimately mixed with a scintillator. Nuclides used in radioimmunoassays of clinical interest that emit gamma or X-rays include 125I, 131I, 51Cr, 57Co. Some radionuclides that emit gamma or X- ray also emit beta particles or electrons during their decay (131I, 60Co, 53Fe). The total number of atoms of the radionuclide present which spontaneously decay in a unit time is the absolute activity of that sample, usually expressed as disintegration per minute DPM. Because of some factors in the environment, every disintegration is not detected by the photo-multiplier tube. Since the counts per minute (CPM) are always a fraction of the actual disintegration per minute, the efficiency of the counting system is expressed as - % Efficiency = CPM / DPM x 100 1 Procedure for the Use of Liquid Scintillation Counters: • The radionuclide emits a beta particle which upon collision, transfers its energy to an aromatic organic solvent molecule; • The π -electron cloud of these solvent molecules accept this energy and becomes excited to a higher energy level; • Next, the energy from the activated solvent molecule is transferred to another organic molecule serving as the scintillator (Solute); • The scintillator, upon return to ground state, emits light, which is detected using appropriate PMT. Processes in Liquid Scintillation Counting Excited states Solvent Ionization Solvent Diffusion Re-combination & Migration Internal Conversions Solute π σ Photon Emission Radioactive Quenching Sample β Emitter 2 LSC Scintillator Guide Fluorescence Scintillator Acronym emission function maximum, nm BBOT Prim &Sec. 425-435 Butyl-PBD Primary 360-365 PBD Primary 360-370 PPO Primary 360-365 p-TP Primary Bis-MSB Secondary 420-430 dimethyl Secondary 425-430 POPOP Solvent PPO* POPOP* Touline PMT Sensitivity Light Emission Wavelength 450 nm The more energetic the beta, more collisions occur, thus, yielding the greater number, N, of excited solvent molecules. Since the emitted ultraviolet radiation is not suitable for detection in the 200-260 nm wavelength range, fluorescent organic materials are added to the solvent which are capable of absorbing the UV radiation. These fluors re-emit the energy at longer wavelengths. The fluor absorbs the short wavelength energy and re-emits it at a longer wavelength, preferably in the visible region. 3 Detection Liquid Scintillation counter: A comparison of detection limits of some other methods of analysis with those detection limits obtained by using radioisotopes are shown below. Common methods of analysis METHOD OF ANALYSIS LIMIT OF DETECTABILITY REMARKS IR Spectroscopy 1015 molecules Non-destructive UV Spectroscopy 1015 molecules Non-destructive Atomic Absorption 1013 atoms Destructive Flame Emission 1013 atoms Destructive Gas Chromatography 1013 atoms Destructive Radio-Isotopes Non-destructive 14C 1011 atoms (half life 5730 yr.) 3H 109 atoms (half life 12.26 yr.) 32P 6 x 106 atoms (half life 14.29 d) Characterization of Beta Energy Spectrum- Distribution of beta particles emitted from a single type of nucleus Ep dN H# 1. Maximum Particle Energy (Emax) dE E max 2. Pulse Height at Peak Energy (Ep) 3. Inflection Point (H# number) Energy (keV) 4. Average Pulse Height – Spectral Index of the Sample (SIS) n(x) u Σ x=0 x * n(x) SIS = K Σu x x=0 n(x) Energy (keV) 4 Commonly used beta emitting isotopes ISOTOPE EMAX (MEV) 3H 0.018 14C 0.156 35S 0.168 45Ca 0.250 32P 1.710 131I 0.610 (F/87% BETA ACTIVITY) Tritium beta particle detection requires – • A more sensitive detector • High efficiency energy converter If a beta emitting material is interspersed with an aromatic solvent, such as benzene, toluene, or P-xylene, the emitted particle produces excitation and ionization in the solvent. Electrons in the conjugated carbon-carbon double bonds of these aromatic solvent molecules are excited to a high energy state by absorbing some of the beta particles energy and upon returning to the lower energy ground state, release their energy in the form of light. This conversion of kinetic energy to light is referred to as the scintillation process Beta Collision Process Excited Excited Solute Solvent Emitted Photons Ground Ground Quenching Level Level Solvent Solute Sample 5 Solvents Solvents and fluors used in liquid scintillation counting Solvent Fluors Dioxane PPO Toluene dimethyl - popopbutyl PBO p-Xylene PBBO. Some key properties are: a) Purity b) High solubility for sample and the fluors, c) High transfer efficiency for conversion of particles energy into excited molecules d) Chemical stability. Since small amounts of certain substances can produce a dramatic loss of scintillation efficiency, highly purified solvents are necessary. Toluene P PPO Emission h 1. PPO Absorption o Emission t o n I n t e n s i t y 0 480 280 Wavelength (nm) 6 The Excitation Process A. Photon Emission 1. The primary excitation in liquid scintillation counting is produced by a charged particle (beta) passing through or stopped by the scintillation solution. This transfer of energy results in the production of a large number of excited molecules and ion pairs. The ions recombine with electrons to produce additional excited molecules. 2. About 60% of the fluorescing molecules are generated by this mechanism. 3. The remaining 40% are the result of direct excitation of the solvent molecule. 4. The amount of light produced by the solution (scintillation yield) will depend on the concentration of the scintillator (fluor). Excimers are the dimers formed by a pair of excited molecule and an unexcited molecule of the same kind. In this equilibrium high concentration and low temperatures favor the excimer formation. The excimer has lower energy than the monomer so that it’s fluorescence light has the longer wavelength. B. Quenching Effect Quench - anything that interferes with the scintillation process in any of the above four steps prevents light from reaching the PMT, results in a loss in the number of recorded counts and in the apparent energy. The Causes of Quench are- 1) Impurities in the cocktail material, 2) Insufficient amounts of solute or solvent 3) Too much sample volume. Color quenching occurs when colored substances, present in the sample, absorb the light emitted by the scintillator (fluors) before it can escape the vial and reach PMT. The net effect of Color quenching is the reduction in CPM registered by the counter. 7 Scintillation yield The scintillation yield is defined as the total energy emitted by the solution (as light or photons) divided by the energy of the particle that excites the solution to fluoresce. Scintillation efficiency Sx is defined as Sx = Nph . Eph/ Eex Where Nph = average number of photons Eph = average energy of photons Eex = energy of the exciting particle The solvent determines the overall scintillation efficiency. Efficiency has different value for • each solvent • different isotopes in the same solvent From the scintillation efficiency - it is possible to calculate the average number of photons (Nph ) produced by a particle of energy Eex. Nph = Sx Eex / Eph The average energy of the photons Eph can be calculated from the average wavelength of fluorescence. For the scintillator, PPO, the average wavelength of fluorescence is 3900 oA. Eph = hν = h C/λ 5 10 5 Eph = (4.143 x 10 eV) (2.99 x 10 )/(3.8 x 10- ) At about 7 gm/liter of PPO in toluene, the transfer efficiency is about 100% and the quantum efficiency is 1.0 3 Nph = (0.04) (10 eV/KeV) (Eex)/(3.2 eV) Nph = 12.5 KeV (Eex) The number of photoelectrons produced at the photo-cathode is now given by: No. of photoelectrons = Nph x photo-cathode efficiency The photo cathode efficiency is 28% for the bralkalu type phototube currently in use. 8 Quench Indicating Parameters 1. Based on Sample Spectrum: A parameter is derived from the sample spectrum. Quench correction curve is generated by measuring this parameter on a set of standard sources with different quenching effects. The unknown sample measurement is corrected for the quenching using this curve. Different parameters are - • Spectral Index Sample (SIS): Average Energy of sample spectrum. • Sample channel Ratio (SCR) Ratio of counts in two channels selected in such a way that the ratio of counts indicates the quenching effect. Channel A CPM Channel B Energy • Spectral Quench Parameter of Isotope (SQP): The spectrum is transformed by log E operation. The Sample Index Spectrum of this spectrum defines the SQP and is the mean log energy of the spectrum. SQP – Average Counts / log energy Minute Log (Energy) 9 B. Quenching Effects 1. Self-quenching: Increasing the concentration beyond the optimal level will usually result in an appreciable reduction in scintillation yield. 2. Solute (Scintillator)-quenching: The reduction in efficiency with increasing scintillator concentration appears to depend on the ability of the scintillator to achieve a co-planer configuration. This may result in either an increase or decrease in measured scintillation efficiency depending on the form (monomer or dimer) that is more favorable. Inherent interference in Liquid Scintillation Spectrum Analyses 1. Quenching – Two main types are - Chemical: causes energy loss in transfer from Solvent to solute. Colour : Causes Attenuation of photons. UnUnquenchedquenched CPMU & SISU of quenched spectrum of a sample are used to Quenched obtain the DPMU by reference to a n(x) graph between the Efficiency and SIS.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix B: Recommended Procedures
    Recommended Procedures Appendix B Appendix B: Recommended Procedures Appendix B provides recommended procedures for tasks frequently performed in the laboratory. These procedures outline acceptable methods for meeting radiation safety requirements. The procedures are generic in nature, allowing for the diversity of research facilities, on campus. Contamination Survey Procedures Surveys are performed to monitor for the presence of contamination. Minimum survey frequencies are specified on the radiation permit. The surveys should be sufficiently extensive to allow confidence that there is no contamination. Common places to check for contamination are: bench tops, tools and equipment, floors, telephones, floors, door handles and drawer pulls, and computer keyboards. Types of Contamination Removable contamination can be readily transferred from one surface to another. Removable contamination may present an internal and external hazard because it can be picked up on the skin and ingested. Fixed contamination cannot be readily removed and generally does not present a significant hazard unless the material comes loose or is present large enough amounts to be an external hazard. Types of Surveys There are two types of survey methods used: 1) a direct (or meter) survey, and 2) a wipe (or smear) survey. Direct surveys, using a Geiger-Mueller (GM) detector or scintillation probe, can identify gross contamination (total contamination consisting of both fixed and removable contamination) but will detect only certain isotopes. Wipe surveys, using “wipes” such as cotton swabs or filter papers counted on a liquid scintillation counter or gamma counter can identify removable contamination only but will detect most isotopes used at the U of I. Wipe surveys are the most versatile and sensitive method of detecting low-level removable contamination in the laboratory.
    [Show full text]
  • THESIS VERIFICATION of BACKGROUND REDUCTION in a LIQUID SCINTILLATION COUNTER Submitted by Marilyn Alice Magenis Department of E
    THESIS VERIFICATION OF BACKGROUND REDUCTION IN A LIQUID SCINTILLATION COUNTER Submitted by Marilyn Alice Magenis Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Summer 2013 Master’s Committee: Advisor: Alexander Brandl Thomas E. Johnson John Volckens John Harton ABSTRACT VERIFICATION OF BACKGROUND REDUCTION IN A LIQUID SCINTILLATION COUNTER A new method for subtraction of extraneous cosmic ray background counts from liquid scintillation detection has been developed by HidexTM. The method uses a background counter located beneath the liquid scintillation detector, the guard, to account for background signals. A double to triple coincidence counting methodology is used to reduce photomultiplier noise and to quantify quench. It is important to characterize the interactions from background in any new system. Characterizing interactions in the instrument will help to verify the accuracy and efficiency of the guard by determining the noise cancellation capabilities of the liquid scintillation counter. The liquid scintillation counter and guard detector responses were modeled using MCNP for the expected cosmic ray interactions at the instrument location and altitude in Fort Collins, CO. Cosmic ray interactions in the detector are most relevant to examine because of their predominance due to the higher elevation in Fort Collins. The cosmic ray interactions that are most important come from electron, positron, and gamma interactions. The expected cosmic ray interactions from these particles were modeled by using a cosmic ray library that determines the cosmic rays that are most likely to occur at an altitude of 2100 meters.
    [Show full text]
  • Liquid Scintillation Counting
    Institutionen för medicin och vård Avdelningen för radiofysik Hälsouniversitetet Liquid Scintillation Counting Sten Carlsson Department of Medicine and Care Radio Physics Faculty of Health Sciences Series: Report / Institutionen för radiologi, Universitetet i Linköping; 78 ISSN: 1102-1799 ISRN: LIU-RAD-R-078 Publishing year: 1993 © The Author(s) Report 78 lSSN 1102-1799 Nov 1993 lSRN ULI-RAD-R--78--SE Liquid Scintillation Counting Sten Carlsson Dept of Radiation Physlcs Dept Medical Physlcs Linköping Unlverslly , Sweden: UddevalIa,Svveden i 1. INTRODUCTIQN In liquid scintillation counting (LSC) we use the process ofluminescense to detect ionising radiation emit$ed from a radionuclide. Luminescense is emission of visible light ofnon­ thermal origin. 1t was early found that certain organic molecules have luminescent properties and such molecules are used in LSC. Today LSC is the mostwidespread method to detect pure beta-ernitters like tritium and carbon-14. 1t has unique properties in its efficient counting geometry, deteetability and the lack of any window which the beta­ particles have to penetrate. These properties are achieved by solving the sample to measure in a scintillation cocktail composed of an organic solvent and a solute (scintillator). Even if LSC is a weil established measurement technique, the user can run into problems and abasic knowledge of the deteetor and its different components is offundamental importance in a correct use of the technique. The alm of this presentation is to provide the user with some of this fundamental knowledge. 2. BAS1C PRINCIPLE LSC is based on the principle oftransformlng some of the kinetic energy of the beta-partic1e into light photons.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiation Safety Guide Research Use of Radioactive Materials
    Radiation Safety Guide Research Use of Radioactive Materials Table of Contents Page RADIATION AND RADIOACTIVITY 4 A. Decay by Alpha (α)-Particle Emission 4 B. Decay by Beta (β)− Particle Emission 5 C. Decay by Gamma Ray (γ) emission 5 D. Decay by Electron Capture (X-ray) 5 E. Other sources of Radiation 5 F. Neutron particles (n) 6 G. Radiation Quantities 6 H. Half-life, Biological half-life, Effective half-life 7 I. Radiation Detection Instrument 8 1. Gas-filled detectors 8 2. Scintillation Detector 8 J. Background Radiation 9 K. Biological Effect of Radiation 10 PRINCIPLES OF RADIATION SAFETY 11 A. Occupational Dose Limit 11 B. Public Dose 11 D. Dose to an Embryo/Fetus 11 E. Registration of Radiation Workers 12 F. Personnel Monitoring 12 G. Type of Dosimeters 12 H. Dosimeter Placement 12 I. Internal Monitoring 13 J. Exposure Reports 13 K. ALARA 13 L.Posting 14 1 RADIATION SAFETY PROGRAM 16 A. Individuals Responsible For Radiation Safety Program 16 B. Organization Chart 16 C. Radiation Safety Committee 16 D. Radiation Safety Officer 17 E. Authorized Users 18 F. Radiation Workers 19 G. Radioactive Drug Research Committee (RDRC) 19 H. Medical Radiation Subcommittee (MRC) 22 RADIATION SAFETY PROCEDURES 23 A. Training Program 23 1. Initial Radiation Safety Training 24 2. Annual Refresher Training 24 3. Radiation Safety Training for Clinical Staff 24 4. Radiation Safety Training for House Keeping, Physical Plant and Security Staff 24 5. Radiation Safety Training for irradiator workers 24 B. Audit Program 24 C. Survey Program 25 1. Survey for Removable Contamination 27 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Lumi-Scint Liquid Scintillation Counter
    DOE/EM-0596 Lumi-Scint Liquid Scintillation Counter Deactivation and Decommissioning Focus Area Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management Office of Science and Technology July 2001 Lumi-Scint Liquid Scintillation Counter OST/TMS ID 2311 Deactivation and Decommissioning Focus Area Demonstrated at Miamisburg Environmental Management Project Miamisburg, Ohio Purpose of this document Innovative Technology Summary Reports are designed to provide potential users with the information they need to quickly determine if a technology would apply to a particular environmental management problem. They are also designed for readers who may recommend that a technology be considered by prospective users. Each report describes a technology, system, or process that has been developed and tested with funding from DOE’s Office of Science and Technology (OST). A report presents the full range of problems that a technology, system, or process will address and its advantages to the DOE cleanup in terms of system performance, cost, and cleanup effectiveness. Most reports include comparisons to baseline technologies as well as other competing technologies. Information about commercial availability and technology readiness for implementation is also included. Innovative Technology Summary Reports are intended to provide summary information. References for more detailed information are provided in an appendix. Efforts have been made to provide key data describing the performance, cost, and regulatory acceptance of the technology. If this information was not available at the time of publication, the omission is noted. All published Innovative Technology Summary Reports are available on the OST website at www.em.doe.gov/ost under “Publications.” TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiation Safety
    RADIATION SAFETY FOR LABORATORY WORKERS RADIATION SAFETY PROGRAM DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, SAFETY AND RISK MANAGEMENT UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MILWAUKEE P.O. BOX 413 LAPHAM HALL, ROOM B10 MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN 53201 (414) 229-4275 SEPTEMBER 1997 (REVISED FROM JANUARY 1995 EDITION) CHAPTER 1 RADIATION AND RADIOISOTOPES Radiation is simply the movement of energy through space or another media in the form of waves, particles, or rays. Radioactivity is the name given to the natural breakup of atoms which spontaneously emit particles or gamma/X energies following unstable atomic configuration of the nucleus, electron capture or spontaneous fission. ATOMIC STRUCTURE The universe is filled with matter composed of elements and compounds. Elements are substances that cannot be broken down into simpler substances by ordinary chemical processes (e.g., oxygen) while compounds consist of two or more elements chemically linked in definite proportions. Water, a compound, consists of two hydrogen and one oxygen atom as shown in its formula H2O. While it may appear that the atom is the basic building block of nature, the atom itself is composed of three smaller, more fundamental particles called protons, neutrons and electrons. The proton (p) is a positively charged particle with a magnitude one charge unit (1.602 x 10-19 coulomb) and a mass of approximately one atomic mass unit (1 amu = 1.66x10-24 gram). The electron (e-) is a negatively charged particle and has the same magnitude charge (1.602 x 10-19 coulomb) as the proton. The electron has a negligible mass of only 1/1840 atomic mass units. The neutron, (n) is an uncharged particle that is often thought of as a combination of a proton and an electron because it is electrically neutral and has a mass of approximately one atomic mass unit.
    [Show full text]
  • Liquid Scintillation Counting Techniques for the Determination of Some Alpha Emitting Actinides : a Review
    2 LIQUID SCINTILLATION COUNTING TECHNIQUES FOR THE DETERMINATION OF SOME ALPHA EMITTING ACTINIDES : A REVIEW N.N.Mirashi, Keshav Chander and S.K.Aggarwal Fuel Chemistry Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Center, Mumbai - 400085. 1. INTRODUCTION Liquid scintillation process is based on the conversion of a part of the kinetic energy of alpha / beta / gamma radiation into photons. The photons are counted and related to the concentration of alpha/beta/gamma emitter. The principal use of liquid scintillation counting was the assay of low energy beta emitting nuclides. Alpha emitters could be counted by liquid scintillation counting was also known for long [1]. Alpha emitters, in spite of much lower scintillation yield compared to beta particles, are much more easily counted than beta particles, because alpha particles emit a line spectrum whereas beta spectrum is a continuum. The use of liquid scintillation counting is attractive because of its 100% counting efficiency and simplicity of sample preparation. Alpha particle assay by conventional plate counting methods is difficult because of chemical separation losses and/or self-absorption losses in the final sample may cause either non-reproducible results or create unacceptable errors. Several workers made applications of liquid scintillation counting technique to alpha counting in late 1950s and early 1960s [2-6]; still because of high background, interference from beta particles and very poor energy resolution for alpha energies liquid scintillation counting was not widespread for alpha counting. Horrocks [6] and Ihle et al [7] obtained a good degree of alpha energy resolution by liquid scintillation technique. This has led to identification and determination of mixture of alpha emitters.
    [Show full text]
  • PRTM-1 (Rev. 1)
    PRACTICAL RADIATION TECHNICAL MANUAL WORKPLACE MONITORING FOR RADIATION AND CONTAMINATION WORKPLACE MONITORING FOR RADIATION AND CONTAMINATION PRACTICAL RADIATION TECHNICAL MANUAL WORKPLACE MONITORING FOR RADIATION AND CONTAMINATION INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY VIENNA, 2004 WORKPLACE MONITORING FOR RADIATION AND CONTAMINATION IAEA, VIENNA, 2004 IAEA-PRTM-1 (Rev. 1) © IAEA, 2004 Permission to reproduce or translate the information in this publication may be obtained by writing to the International Atomic Energy Agency, Wagramer Strasse 5, P.O. Box 100, A-1400 Vienna, Austria. Printed by the IAEA in Vienna April 2004 FOREWORD Occupational exposure to ionizing radiation can occur in a range of industries, such as mining and milling; medical institutions; educational and research establishments; and nuclear fuel facilities. Adequate radiation protection of workers is essential for the safe and acceptable use of radiation, radioactive materials and nuclear energy. Guidance on meeting the requirements for occupational protection in accor- dance with the Basic Safety Standards for Protection against Ionizing Radiation and for the Safety of Radiation Sources (IAEA Safety Series No. 115) is provided in three interrelated Safety Guides (IAEA Safety Standards Series No. RS-G-1.1, 1.2 and 1.3) covering the general aspects of occupational radiation protection as well as the assessment of occupational exposure. These Safety Guides are in turn supplemented by Safety Reports providing practical information and technical details for a wide range of purposes, from methods for assessing intakes of radionuclides to optimization of radiation protection in the control of occupational exposure. Occupationally exposed workers need to have a basic awareness and under- standing of the risks posed by exposure to radiation and the measures for managing these risks.
    [Show full text]
  • Phosphorus - 32 Radiological Safety Guidance Revision Date: 09/20/18
    Phosphorus - 32 Radiological Safety Guidance Revision Date: 09/20/18 Physical Data BETA ENERGIES • 1710 keV (maximum) • 694 keV (average)(100%) Physical Half-Life 14.3 days Biological Half-Life 1155 days (Bone)/257 days (Whole Body) Effective Half-Life 14.1 days (Bone)/13.5 days (Whole Body) Specific Activity 285,518 curies/gram Maximum Beta Range in Air 610.00 cm = 240 inches = 20 feet Maximum Beta Range in Water/Tissue 0.76 cm = 1/3 inch = 0.35 inch Maximum Range in Plexiglas/Lucite/Plastic 0.61 cm ~ 3/8 inch ~ 0.38 inch Shielding Half-Value Layer (HVL) 0.076 cm (water/tissue) • DO NOT use lead foil or sheets! Penetrating bremsstrahlung x-rays will be produced! • Use lead sheets or foil to shield bremsstrahlung x-rays and only AFTER low density plexiglass/acrylic/lucite/wood shielding • Use low-atomic (low Z) shielding material to shield P-32 and reduce the generation of bremsstrahlung x-rays. The following materials are low Z materials: plexiglass, acrylic, lucite, plastic, wood, or water. • Do not use lead foil, lead sheets, or other high-density (high atomic number) materials to shield P-32 directly. Penetrating bremsstrahlung x-rays will be generated in lead and other high density shielding material. • Percent of incident P-32 betas converted to bremsstrahlung x-rays: 4.8% (lead), 0.5% (lucite), and 0.3% (wood). NOTES: • A beta particle with an energy of 795 keV can penetrate to a depth of the lens of the eye (0.3 cm or 30 mg/cm2 ). • A beta particle with an energy of ≥ 70 keV is required to penetrate the dead layer of skin.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles and Applications of Liquid Scintillation Counting
    Principles and Applications of Liquid Scintillation Counting A PRIMER FOR ORIENTATION – National Diagnostics Laboratory Staff Principles 1.1 RADIOACTIVE EMISSIONS 1.2 MEASUREMENT OF RADIATION AND ISOTOPE QUANTITATION 1.3 MECHANISM OF LIQUID SCINTILLATION COUNTING 1.4 LIQUID SCINTILLATION SIGNAL INTERPRETATION 1.5 THE COMPLETE SCINTILLATION COCKTAIL 1.6 CHEMILUMINESCENCE AND STATIC ELECTRICITY 1.7 WASTE DISPOSAL ISSUES Applications 2.1 COUNTING DISCRETE SAMPLES 2.2 SPECIAL SAMPLE PREPARATION PROTOCOLS 2.3 FLOW LIQUID SCINTILLATION 2.4 LIQUID SCINTILLATION AND RADIATION SAFETY USA: 1-800-526-3867 © 2004 National Diagnostics EUROPE: 441 482 646022 LSC Concepts - Fundamentals of Liquid Scintillation Counting Fundamentals of Liquid 1 Scintillation Counting 1.1 RADIOACTIVE EMISSIONS 1.4 LIQUID SCINTILLATION SIGNAL Types of Radioactive Emission / Characteristics of INTERPRETATION Useful Isotopes / Use of Isotopes in Research Patterns of Light Emission / Pulse Analysis / Counting Efficiency / Quenching 1.2 MEASUREMENT OF RADIATION AND ISOTOPE QUANTITATION 1.5 THE COMPLETE SCINTILLATION Ionization Detection / Scintillation Detection COCKTAIL 1.3 MECHANISM OF LIQUID 1.6 CHEMILUMINESCENCE AND SCINTILLATION COUNTING STATIC ELECTRICITY The Role of the Solvent / The Role of Phosphors (Scintillators) 1.7 WASTE DISPOSAL ISSUES Liquid Scintillation Counting...Making Light of the Situation he chemical properties of an element are determined by its atomic number - the number of protons in the nucleus (and electrons within neutral atoms of that element). Uncharged neutrons, within the nucleus along Twith protons, do not contribute to the atomic number, but will alter the atomic mass. This makes possible the existence of isotopes, which are atoms of the same element with different atomic weight. Most isotopes are stable, and do not undergo any spontaneous nuclear changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Contamination Monitoring Part A
    Contamination Monitoring Radiation Safety Orientation Open Source Booklet 4 (June 1, 2018) For more information, refer to the Radiation Safety Manual, 2017, RSP-3, Section 10 and the Quick Step Guide for Contamination Monitoring in Radiation Safety Records Binder After work with radioactive material, it is important to confirm the work area is free of radioactive contamination…. Contamination Monitoring has been separated into three parts: • Part A: The Basics of Contamination Monitoring What everyone needs to know! • Part B: Liquid Scintillation Counting Everyone needs to know in order to complete the “Liquid Scintillation Counting Practical Activity” in your own lab with a local LRS or arranged with an EHS mentor. • Part C: Contamination Meter/Surveying for Radioactive Contamination Read before attending in-lab Radiation Safety Workshop. During the radiation safety workshop, you will complete the “Contamination Meter/Surveying for Radioactive Contamination Practical Activity”. Part A: The Basics of Contamination monitoring What everyone needs to know Why is Contamination Monitoring required? The purpose of contamination monitoring is to ensure that levels of radioactive contamination do not exceed legal limits in order to protect: • Staff, students, the public and the environment and • The reliability of experimental results When you find contamination, you must take action! Decontamination and re-monitoring is required. What is Radioactive Contamination? Radioactive Contamination is the presence of radioactive materials in any place where it is not desired, in particular where its presence may be harmful. Contamination may present a risk to a person’s health or the environment. Contamination has also been determined to be the cause of failed experiments.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bibliography of Radiation Biology Teaching Materials * Charles Hinerman,Central Missouristate College, Warrensburg
    A Bibliography of Radiation Biology Teaching Materials * Charles Hinerman,Central MissouriState College, Warrensburg A valuable collection of titles of articles, visual aids, supplies, and equipment useful to anyone involved in teaching Radiobiology. The materials listed here include only those available at the time of writing in 1963. The science of radiationbiology is a rela- mer Institutesin RadiationBiology who gra- tively new one that cuts across almost all ciously submitted lists of references and of the traditionaldivisions of naturalscience. teaching aids. Downloaded from http://online.ucpress.edu/abt/article-pdf/27/6/499/21708/4441019.pdf by guest on 30 September 2021 A limited number of texts and reference books have been written which deal in detail 1. Books,Booklets, Reports, Papers and Pamphlets with both the physical propertiesof ionizing Alexander, Peter. Atomic Radiation and Life, Pen- radiation and its interaction with living or- guin Book A 399, Penguin Books, Inc., Baltimore, ganisms. An endeavor has been made to Maryland. assemble a list of teaching materials which Andrews, Howard L. Radiation Biophysics, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1961. includes some reference materials from all Arnoff, Sam. Techniques of Radiochemistry, Iowa the sciences, and which will enable both University Press, Ames, Iowa, 1956, the teacher and student to gain an insight Atomic Energy Educational Literature. A packet of into the subject matter and philosophy, as useful teaching materials. Specify instructional level. Single copies only. Free. Various U.S.A.E.C. well as the techniques of radiation biology. Operations Offices. The principal criterion for the selection of Atomic Energy Institute for Junior High School materialswas the frequency with which the Science Teechers.
    [Show full text]