DOCSLIB.ORG

Download the Kerbs and Channels Standard

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download the Kerbs and Channels Standard KC0000 Kerb Design drawing index SED_NO Title KC0000 Kerb design Index KC0001 Kerb and channel - Type 1 - 2 KC0002 Kerb and channel - Type 3 - 8 KC0003 Kerb and channel - Type 9 - 15 KC0004 V-Dish Channel - Type 16 to 18 KC0005 Round Dish Channel - Type 19 & 20 KC0006 Kerb & channel replacement detail KC0007 Kerb & Channel replacement with Subsoil KC0030 Kassel Kerb and Channel Transition Standard Engineering Details Working Draft - For Review Transport Design Manual | Date: Review Document in Review TDM TECHNICAL STANDARDS SED No. Version Kerb design Index DATE: February 14, 2020 1 KC0000 A 50 125 300 50 125 300 50 50 20mm Chamfer Kerb block as directed 50 120 120 50 150 150 200 200 KC0001 200 200 Concrete haunching 50 50 300 Refer Note 3 300 335 Mesh Refer Note 3 Concrete haunching 20MPa TYPE 1 STANDARD KERB AND CHANNEL TYPE 1A KERB WITH REINFORCED HAUNCHING DETAIL 50 125 300 200 x 125mm Kerb Block 50 Mountable kerb 30 120 150 90 150 200 75 110 Refer Note 3 75 Refer Note 3 Shear key TYPE 1C ON SIDE VEHICLE CROSSING TYPE 1S AND 2S WITH SHEAR KEY WHERE HIGH LATERAL LOADS ARE EXPECTED 50 125 300 50 145 300 50 75 50 70 180 x 145mm mountable kerb 50 100 50 75 145 100 140 200 200 Concrete haunching Concrete haunching Refer Note 3 Standard Engineering Details Refer Note 3 300 TYPE 2A MOUNTABLE KERB AND CHANNEL TYPE 2B MOUNTABLE KERB AND CHANNEL NOTES: 1. Concrete grades: 2. Precast kerb blocks: 20MPa. In-situ channel and haunching 20MPa. 25 MPa fibre reinforced concrete for slip-form. 3. Bedding: Kerbing must be laid on 300mm (min.) GAP65 subbase in roads and 100mm GAP40 in footpaths (where subgrade CBR>5). If the subgrade CBR<5 then roads and footpaths must be undercut and backfilled with an approved filling material. 4. Jointing: Precast kerbs to be neatly pointed with 10mm (min.) cement mortar. Extruded kerbs cracking control joints formed or saw cut to a minimum depth of 30mm at max. 3.0m intervals. If footpathWorking is adjacent to kerb the saw cuts mustDraft coincide with the - For Review concrete footpath joints. Joints between bluestone kerb blocks must be approximately 20mm wide (measured at the top and front faces) with neat square jointing 2 to 4mm proud. Crack control joints must be located either side of vehicle crossings. 5. Basalt kerb blocks must not extend across vehicle or pram crossing. 6. All chamfers to be 20mm. Transport Design Manual | Date: Review Document in Review TDM TECHNICAL STANDARDS SED No. Version Kerb and channel - Type 1 - 2 DATE: February 14, 2020 1 KC0001 A 155 300 20 150 300 180 150 300 R30 R30 120 150 40 70 TYPE 4 EXTRUDED VEHICLE CROSSING 300 220 300 300 180 180 20 KC0002 180 TYPE 3 EXTRUDED STANDARD TYPE 3 EXTRUDED STANDARD KERB KERB AND CHANNEL AND CHANNEL ( OPTIONAL) TYPE 4 IN-SITU VEHICLE CROSSING 150 300 Back of kerbs 300 300 180 300 15 15 60 Max. 1 in 8 fall R30 5% 5% 5% 5% 60 30 235 200 175 145 200 Footpath Refer Note 2 Refer Note 2 480 TYPE 5 EXTRUDED PRAM CROSSING TYPE 5 IN-SITU PRAM CROSSING TYPE 6 EXTRUDED MOUNTABLE KERB AND CHANNEL 150 25 Berm Footpath R20 R30 25 R30 65 60 165 150 75 40 75 300 5 75 Fall 210 Fall 150 150 Berm 150 100 75 100 Footpath Standard Engineering Details 300 300 TYPE 7 EXTRUDED STANDARD KERB ONLY TYPE 7C EXTRUDED KERB ONLY TYPE 8 BASALT OR PRE-CAST AT VEHICLE CROSSING KERB EDGING (75x150mm) NOTES : 1. Jointing: Precast kerb neatly pointed with 10mm min. cement mortar. Extruded kerbs cracking control joints formed or saw cut to a minimum depth of 30mm at max. 3.00m. intervals to coincide with concrete footpath joints (where the kerb is adjacent to the footpath). Crack control joints between bluestone kerb blocks shall be approximately 20mm wide (measured at the top and front faces) with neat square jointing 2 to 4 mm proud. Joints must located either side of vehicle crossings. 2. Bedding: Working Draft - For Review Kerbing must be laid on 300mm. min. GAP65 subbase in roads and 100mm GAP40 in footpaths (where subgrade CBR>5). If the subgrade CBR<5 then roads and footpaths must be undercut and backfilled with appropriate backfill material. 3. Concrete Grades: Precast kerb blocks 20 MPa. In-Situ channel and haunching 20 MPa. Extruded concrete 25 MPa fibre reinforced. 4. All chamfers 20mm Transport Design Manual | Date: Review Document in Review TDM TECHNICAL STANDARDS SED No. Version Kerb and channel - Type 3 - 8 DATE: February 14, 2020 1 KC0002 A 200 200 50 125 150 20mm chamfer 50 50 50 75 20mm chamfer 50 D6 dowel bars 50 200 150 200 FALL 5 200 Concrete haunching KC0003 200 75 Refer Note 3 300 TYPE 9 EDGING NIB KERB TYPE 10 KERB AND STUB D10 dowel bars at 150 50 600mm spacing 180 150 60 150 30 210 50 60 90 420 30 5 Outfall 145 140 40 Shear key 180 Refer Note 3 330 Refer Note 3 TYPE 11 MOUNTABLE NIB KERB TYPE 12 RAISED NON-MOUNTABLE SAFETY KERB AND CHANNEL NIB Concrete beam must be 25MPa 65 65 200 65 180 125 60 Refer Note 3 75 Haunching must be 20MPa Refer Note 3 130 TYPE 13 FLAT EDGE BEAMS TYPE 14 EXTRUDED CYCLE PATH BEVEL KERB Standard Engineering Details 65 180 100 200 TYPE 15 EXTRUDED CYCLE MOUNTABLE KERB NOTES: 1. Concrete grades: 2. Precast kerb blocks 20MPa. In-Situ channel and haunching 20MPa. 25 MPa fibre reinforced concrete for slip-form. 3. Bedding: Kerbing must be laid on 300mm. min. GAP65 subbase in roads and 100mm GAP40 in footpaths (where subgrade CBR>5). If the subgrade CBR<5 then roads and footpaths must be undercut and backfilled with an approved filling material 4. Jointing: Working Draft - For Review Precast and blue stone kerb to be neatly pointed with 10mm (min) cement mortar. No preshaped mortar products shall be used. Extruded kerbs cracking control joints formed or saw cut to aminimum depth of 30mm at max. 3.00m intervals. If footpath is adjacent to kerb the saw cuts must coincide with the concrete footpath joints. Joints between bluestone kerb blocks must be approximately 20mm wide (measured at the top and front faces) with neat square jointing 2 to 4 mm proud. Crack control joints must located either side of vehicle crossings. 5. Basalt kerb blocks must not extend across vehicle or pram crossings. Transport Design Manual | Date: Review Document in Review TDM TECHNICAL STANDARDS SED No. Version Kerb and channel - Type 9 - 15 DATE: February 14, 2020 1 KC0003 A 300 300 30 180 KC0004 3-D12 reinforcing bars R6 stps @ 60mm crs or fiber reinforced concrete Refer Note 2 TYPE 17 V-DISH CHANNEL INSITU NOT UNDER TRAFFIC 3% Fiber reinforced concrete 10 180 170 300 TYPE 16 FLAT EDGE BEAM 300 300 50 200 3-D12 reinforcing bars R6 stps @ 60mm crs or fiber reinforced concrete Refer Note 2 TYPE 18 V-DISH CHANNEL UNDER TRAFFIC Standard Engineering Details NOTES 1. Concrete Grades: Insitu concrete 20MPa Extruded concrete 20MPa, fiber reinforced 25 MPa fibre reinforced concrete for slip-form. 2. Bedding: To consist of 300mm (min) GAP65 subbase in roads (where CBR>5). 3. Jointing: Extruded channels cracking control joints formed or saw cut to a minimum depth of 30mm at max 3.00m intervals for unreinforced Working Draft - For Review channels and 3.00m (max) for reinforced channels/nib. If there is a footpath adjacent to the channel/nib the sawcut must coincide with the concrete footpath joint. Transport Design Manual | Date: Review Document in Review TDM TECHNICAL STANDARDS SED No. Version V-Dish Channel - Type 16 to 18 DATE: February 14, 2020 1 KC0004 A 30mm deep Dish KC0005 100 Fall 20mm Chamfer 180 3 No. 10mmØ Reinforcing Bars with 60mm Cover or fiber reinforced concrete 100 100 600 TYPE 19 STANDARD CONCRETE ROUND DISH CHANNEL 50 50 D12 @ 600 crs Cut surface excavates and seal gaps 1:3 50 20 Min Road Surface 100 Max 50 Min 50 Min 97 Concrete haunching Refer Note 2 300 295 Standard Engineering Details 396 TYPE 20 KERB PROFILE FOR TRAFFIC ISLANDS AND ROUNDABOUT FOR OVER - DIMENSION ROUTES NOTES: 1. 25 MPa fibre reinforced concrete for slip-form. 2. Bedding: To consist of 300mm (min) GAP65 subbase in roads (where CBR>5). 3. Jointing: Extruded channels cracking control joints formed or saw cut to a minimum depth of Working Draft - For Review 30mm at max 3.00m intervals for unreinforced channels and 3.00m (max) for reinforced channels/nib. If there is a footpath adjacent to the channel/nib the sawcut must coincide with the concrete footpath joint. Transport Design Manual | Date: Review Document in Review TDM TECHNICAL STANDARDS SED No. Version Round Dish Channel - Type 19 & 20 DATE: February 14, 2020 1 KC0005 A Extent of Work - Kerb & Channel Sawcut Footpath and excavate Berm 400mm from face of kerb Extent of Work - Kerb only 300 Refer to Note 6 300 min. KC0006 400 30mm Asphaltic Concrete to match existing on Cationic 60 Bitumen Emulsion Tackcoat Varies Sawcut existing road 600mm (Refer note 7) from Channel Lip Joint to be Crack Sealed Footpath 20MPa Concrete 100mm thick on compacted GAP40 Basecourse or 150mm compacted AP40 Basecourse as 25mm Mix10 Asphalt on compacted GAP40 Basecourse per Auckland Transport's specification for Grass Berm supply of aggregate Spread 100mm Topsoil and sow Grass Seed as specified on compacted backfill 300mm minimum compacted GAP65 Subbase, as per Type 1 Standard Kerb & Auckland Transport's specification for supply of Channel aggregate (Refer Note 1) TYPICAL SECTION FOR KERB & CHANNEL AND KERB ONLY REPLACEMENT NOTES: 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Highlight / Progress Report
    HIGHLIGHT / PROGRESS REPORT PROJECT NAME: Kinloch Road Regeneration Project Manager: Ian Imlah Reporting Period: 28/03/2012 – 15/08/12 Date report prepared: 9 August 2012 Implementation of the Full Business Project stage: Project stage completion date: 31 May 2013 Case Tolerance levels for this stage: Project Plan + / - 15 working days Project budget + / - 10%, or £10,000 whichever is greater Progress – please refer to Project Plan Key products completed this period Key products outstanding this Revised Key products for next reporting Delivery date (including those completed ahead of schedule) period delivery date period (including brief explanation of why product outstanding) New Road Construction Works is underway Agreement on how to progress with 31/12/2012 Delivery of footway works 31 October land adjacent to former council 2012 depot site Detailed Design for Footway Works Completed Delivery of soft landscaping works 31 May 2013 Soft landscaping design agreed with ABC. Contract documents to be finalised and issued for tender. Royal Hotel Footway Works Complete. Risk Management – please refer to Risk Register (updates risks below in bold italic text) o:\a_campbeltown\cn03_kinloch_road\board_papers\l_150812\cn03_highlight_prog_rep_august 2012.doc Budget Management – please refer to Resource Allocation Schedule Total budget available to complete FBC stage: £100,000 Actual expenditure £102,209 Variance explanation if required: Revenue budget now used – Business Case developed and now progressing implementation stage (capital expenditure) Budget approved – implementation of public £2,080,000 realm and soft landscaping works: Actual expenditure to date (as at 31 July 2012) £715,013 Variance explanation if required: Budget approved - ACHA £800,000 Actual expenditure to date (as at 31 July 2012) £0 Variance explanation if required: Any further information Status update on elements: Public Realm - • Public realm associated with the new road has been procured through the road contract.
    [Show full text]
  • Road Drainage in This Chapter
    Road Drainage In this chapter 01 Introduction 3 02 Design principles 5 2.1 Water sensitive design (WSD) or Integrated Stormwater Management (ISM) 5 2.2 Integration of drainage 6 2.3 Tiered objectives for stormwater management design in road reserves 7 2.4 Major/minor drainage 11 03 Surface water management 12 04 Stormwater management devices 13 4.1 Treatment /Management Options Tool Box 15 4.2 Bio-retention swales, rain gardens and tree pits 16 4.3 Pervious paving 17 4.4 Sand filters, gravel trenches and rain tanks 18 4.5 Ponds and wetlands 18 4.6 Swales and vegetated swales 19 4.7 Soakage pits 20 4.8 Proprietary devices 20 05 Kerbs and channels 20 06 Catchpits 22 6.1 Catchpit location 22 6.2 Catchpit design 23 6.3 Catchpit approved types 25 6.4 Catchpit selection criteria 25 6.5 Catchpit inlet selection 25 6.6 Catchpit leads 26 07 Manholes 27 08 Rural road drainage 27 09 Subsoil drains 29 10 Minor culverts 29 11 Special areas 31 2 TDM | ENGINEERING DESIGN CODE Road drainage & surface water control 01 Introduction PURPOSE This chapter gives guidance for the design of drainage in the road reserve. It specifies limitations on design choices to achieve consistency across the region, while catering for local conditions. It aims to promote efficiency, effectiveness and economy of capital investment and operational management water sensitive design. SCOPE The situations covered include: • Drainage of surface water within road reserves. • Collection, conveyance and treatment of run-off from roads. • Management of stormwater discharging from land onto road reserves.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transport - VERSION 1 Bus Infrastructure Public Transport – Bus Infrastructure
    Public Transport - VERSION 1 Bus Infrastructure Public transport – bus Infrastructure In this chapter 01 Introduction 5 Bus stop types 35 07 02 Design parameters 6 Bus stop elements 40 08 2.1 Design vehicles 6 8.1 Bus stop kerbs 41 2.2 Design for bus drivers 11 8.2 Bus stop passenger area 44 2.3 Design for bus users 11 8.3 Bus shelters 46 8.4 Landscaping 52 03 Movement or upgrading of bus stops 15 Bus stop lighting 56 09 04 Bus stop location 15 4.1 Decisions about bus stop location 15 Bus stop branding 57 10 4.2 Bus stop spacing 16 Public transport interchanges 57 4.3 Bus stops for school bus routes 17 11 4.4 Bus stop capacity 17 Electric buses 57 12 4.5 Bus stop placement 19 4.6 Bus stop locations to avoid 23 Cycleways at bus stops 58 13 05 Bus stop layout 24 Bus layover and driver facilities 60 14 5.1 Bus stop layout types 26 14.1 Factors influencing bus layover location 61 14.2 Bus layover design 61 06 Bus stop signs and markings 33 6.1 Bus stop sign 33 6.2 Bus box road marking 34 6.3 No stopping at all times road marking 34 6.4 Bus stop road text 34 6.5 Coloured surface treatment 35 5794_16.04.21 2 TDM | ENGINEERING DESIGN CODE 3 Public transport – bus Infrastructure 01 Introduction PURPOSE Well-designed bus infrastructure must: • Provide easy access for buses through o accessible and safe walking routes to the bus stop o consider all user groups who will have different needs o making it easy and accessible to board and alight from the bus.
    [Show full text]
  • Accessibility to Public Transport: a Best Practice Guide October 2010
    Accessibility to public transport: a best practice guide October 2010 C. O’Fallon Pinnacle Research & Policy Ltd, Wellington Accessibility to public transport: a best practice guide Contents B1 Introduction to the best practice guide ..................................................................................... 4 B1.1 Overview ....................................................................................................................4 B1.2 Definitions .................................................................................................................4 B1.2.1 Users ...............................................................................................................4 B1.2.2 Modes, services and routes covered .............................................................5 B1.2.3 Source of best practice factors ......................................................................5 B1.3 Structure of the guide ...............................................................................................5 B2 Getting to the service by self ......................................................................................................... 5 B2.1 Introduction...............................................................................................................5 B2.2 Footpath ....................................................................................................................6 B2.2.1 Changes in surface level of accessible footpath...........................................6 B2.2.2
    [Show full text]
  • Dunkeld Court Spinner Street Dunmore Street Buchanan Street
    G G no kerb -as existing- RS WH no kerb -as existing- WT WH WT WT parking as existing WH NORTH WH G 70.00 0m 5m 10m 15m 20m MH no kerb -as existing- parking as existing as parking RSWH WT new cycle Street Buchanan stands RS THL G DOOR UK LIBRARY new seat MH UK 69.41 bin relocated WH UK ext 0.8m parking as existing MH MH G radius 69.02 DOOR 69.75 UK new seat G UCF Raised crossing at junction Paved area outside WH Spinner Street DOOR THL to provide a continuous UK ext library with seats, cycle radius LP 0.8m UK footway stands, raised planters FH new seat with trees and shrubs. PHARMACY UK Mk noticeboard UK retained Zebra WH UK crossing with WT flashing GAS DOOR lights UK GAS TK Footway widened, TK (hooded) GAS DK GAS carriageway narrowed GAS DK FH Mk GAS GAS TK TK MH MH 68.60 existing 4.50 68.60 UK GAS GASkerb GAS G 2.00 GAS UK Mk 0.8m radius UK ext PB UK 12.00 LP WH UK UCF parking as existing as parking UK ext UK Dunkeld Court radius 0.8m UK Raised crossing at 12.92 junction to provide a UK continuous footway G 6.50 UK Raised crossing at junction UK ext 0.8m to provide a continuous radius UK No kerb -as existing- footway UCF Buchanan Court UK ext 0.8m radius UK SV R6.45 SV G UK driveway G G WT TK TK Footway widened, MH WH 67.46 DK DK carriageway narrowed No kerb -as existing- UCC TK TK UK LP 5.79 TK DK TK WH no kerb -as existing- 1.27 6.60 14.80 DOOR G disabled space disabled WH DENTIST WT 2.70 driveway S5 Footway widened, WT WT WH WT new no kerb -as existing- carriageway narrowed.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Conserving and Enhancing the Landscape Settings of Our Rural Highways
    A Guide to Conserving and Enhancing the Landscape Settings of our Rural Highways Cranborne Chase Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty Craggatak Consulting November 2015 Acknowledgements This guidance was developed by the Cranborne Chase AONB Partnership through its Planning and Transportation Topic Group. The Partnership is grateful to Paul Tiplady of Craggatak Consulting who drafted this guidance. The AONB Partnership would also like to thank their partners’ staff for their helpful comments on the drafts, in particular: Stephen Hardy, Tony Harris of Dorset County Council and Sue Mitchell of Dorset AONB; and Graeme Hay and Fiona Elphick of Wiltshire Council. In addition, James Purkiss, a Senior Transport and Spatial Planner employed by the Halcrow Group Limited has supplied background material and invaluable comments. An initial draft was circulated for comment and was followed by detailed discussion at the Planning & Transportation annual seminar 10th May 2012. A formal consultation was undertaken during autumn 2012 and the AONB hosted a special meeting with representatives from the relevant highway authorities on the 26th February 2013 to review and discuss the final draft of this document. The partnership is grateful to Paul Garrod, Hampshire County Council, and Mike Winter and Tim Lawton from Dorset County Council for attending this meeting and providing invaluable comments and critique. Following this meeting a final version of this document was prepared by Emma Rouse, Wyvern Heritage and Landscape Consultancy. Richard Burden commissioned the project and undertook the editing of this report. The following people and organisations have provided photographs (as shown in the text) and given permission for their use.
    [Show full text]
  • Kassel Kerb Q10 115
    DATA SHEET KASSEL KERB Q10 115 Product Information Product specification A major advance in public transport access and convenience, Kassel Manufacturing process Manufacture and tested in a wet cast process in Kerb offers a unique solution for bus docking by providing a accordance with BS EN 1340 - 2003. (with the reduced gap between pavement and the bus platform. The results exception of determining the compressive strength) are safer, faster and easier passenger, wheelchair and pushchair Strength Compressive strength Mean concrete strength tested in accordance with access, providing a more efficient and accessible community BS EN 12390 - 2 transport service. Testing hardened concrete - making and curing specimens for strength testing The unique profile of the Brett Kassel Kerb, with its 75° face and Target strength ≥ 50N/mm2 bottom end radius, has been designed to minimise tyre wear when Bending strength buses are pulling into the bus stop, thereby reducing tyre Class 2 - Characteristic bending strength of 5 MPa replacement costs for bus operating companies. with no individual result less than 4 MPa Slip/Skid Resistance The slip resistance determined in accordance with The range BS 7976 - 2:2002 Average wet value = 59 160mm and 180mm standard kerbs • Abrasion Resistance Determined in accordance with BS EN 1340:2003 • Radii and Quadrants Mean = 19.5 • Flat blocks Class 4 Half kerbs Reaction to fire In accordance with BS EN 1340:2003 • Concrete kerb units are Class A1 reaction to fire • Transition units and Ramp sets without testing.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised BRT PSC Item #6 May 21, 2010
    Revised BRT PSC Item #6 May 21, 2010 BusBus GuidanceGuidance TechnologyTechnology PresentedPresented toto thethe EastEast BayBay BRTBRT PolicyPolicy SteeringSteering CommitteeCommittee MayMay 21,21, 20102010 WhatWhat isis BusBus Guidance?Guidance? TechnologyTechnology thatthat automatesautomates oror assistsassists thethe operatoroperator inin thethe steering,steering, docking,docking, accelerationacceleration andand decelerationdeceleration ofof thethe busbus ThereThere areare twotwo generalgeneral typestypes ofof guidance:guidance: MechanicalMechanical ElectronicElectronic FurtherFurther informationinformation -- WikipediaWikipedia BenefitsBenefits ofof BusBus GuidanceGuidance ImprovedImproved vehicularvehicular safetysafety inin traffictraffic BetterBetter rideride qualityquality andand improvedimproved passengerpassenger cabincabin safetysafety MayMay permitpermit narrowernarrower dedicateddedicated busbus laneslanes MayMay reducereduce longlong--termterm pavementpavement costcost AidsAids levellevel boardingboarding andand CreatesCreates narrownarrow horizontalhorizontal gapgap atat boardingboarding platformplatform toto complycomply withwith ADAADA BusBus GuidanceGuidance TechnologyTechnology Mechanical Guidance Kassel Kerb (England & throughout Europe) Concrete Guideway w/ Guide wheel (Essen, Manheim, Adelaide) Horizontal Guide wheel for Precision Docking (Cleveland, Eugene) Subsurface guide rail (Nancy, France) Electronic Guidance Optical Guidance (Rouen France, Las Vegas NV) Magnetic Guidance (Netherlands)
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Stop Infrastructure Design Guidelines May 2009
    Bus Stop Infrastructure Design Guidelines May 2009 www.arta.co.nz Published in May 2009 by: The Auckland Regional Transport Authority Private Bag 92 236 Auckland, New Zealand This document is available on the ARTA website: www.arta.co.nz CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................................... ii FOREWORD .......................................................................................................................... iii 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 2. PROVIDING AN ACCESSIBLE BUS NETWORK .................................................................. 7 3. BUS STOP LOCATION, SpaCING AND CapaCITY .......................................................... 10 4. BUS STOP TYPES AND LEVEL OF INFRASTRUCTURE PROVISION .................................. 19 5. BUS STOP LAYOUTS ..................................................................................................... 35 6. KERB PROFILE .............................................................................................................. 44 7. OTHER FACTORS TO CONSIDER ................................................................................... 47 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................ 49 ABBREVIATIONS AND GLOSSARY ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Audit Report RR
    Auditing public transport accessibility in New Zealand October 2010 NZ Transport Agency research report 417 Auditing public transport accessibility in New Zealand October 2010 C. O’Fallon Pinnacle Research & Policy Ltd, Wellington NZ Transport Agency research report 417 ISBN 978-0-478-36490-3 (print) ISBN 978-0-478-36491-0 (electronic) ISSN 1173-3756 (print) ISSN 1173-3764 (electronic) NZ Transport Agency Private Bag 6995, Wellington 6141, New Zealand Telephone 64 4 894 5400; facsimile 64 4 894 6100 [email protected] www.nzta.govt.nz O’Fallon, C (2010) Auditing public transport accessibility in New Zealand. NZ Transport Agency research report no.417. 150pp. Carolyn O'Fallon Pinnacle Research & Policy Ltd PO Box 12-483, Thorndon, Wellington 6011, New Zealand [email protected] www.pinnacleresearch.co.nz This publication is copyright © NZ Transport Agency 2010. Material in it may be reproduced for personal or in-house use without formal permission or charge, provided suitable acknowledgement is made to this publication and the NZ Transport Agency as the source. Requests and enquiries about the reproduction of material in this publication for any other purpose should be made to the Research Programme Manager, Programmes, Funding and Assessment, National Office, NZ Transport Agency, Private Bag 6995, Wellington 6141. Keywords: accessibility, audit, best practice, bus, guide, New Zealand, public transport, rail, regional council, report card, train, whole of journey. An important note for the reader The NZ Transport Agency is a Crown entity established under the Land Transport Management Act 2003. The objective of the Agency is to undertake its functions in a way that contributes to an affordable, integrated, safe, responsive and sustainable land transport system.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANS-HUDSON COMMUTING CAPACITY STUDY Appendix A: Interstate Bus Network - Operational and Service Strategies
    TRANS-HUDSON COMMUTING CAPACITY STUDY Appendix A: Interstate Bus Network - Operational and Service Strategies September 2016 Version Final Prepared for: Submitted by: ---------------------------------------------------------------This page was intentionally left blank------------------------------------------------------------- TRANS-HUDSON COMMUTING CAPACITY STUDY CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT AND GUIDING PRINCIPLES .............................................................................................. 2 2 LINCOLN TUNNEL CORRIDOR/PABT FACILITY STRATEGIES .............................................................................. 4 2.1 IMPROVED CORRIDOR OPERATIONS ......................................................................................................................... 5 Second XBL or Route 495 HOT Lane ............................................................................................... 5 Enhanced Bus/HOV Priority Network .............................................................................................. 9 Bus Platooning through Connected and Automated Vehicle Technologies ........................... 12 Connected and Automated Bus Applications
    [Show full text]
  • Transport for London. "Accessible Bus Stop Design Guidance."
    Transport for London Accessible bus stop design guidance Bus Priority Team technical advice note BP1/06 January 2006 MAYOR OF LONDON Accessible bus stop design guidance Further information For further details or advice on the design of accessible bus stops, contact: Bus Priority Team Transport for London Windsor House, 42-50 Victoria Street London, SW1H 0TL Tel 0845 300 7000 Website: www.tfl.gov.uk Contents 1. Introduction...................................................................................................................2 2. Fully accessible bus services..........................................................................................4 3. Bus stop locations.........................................................................................................9 4. Passenger waiting area .................................................................................................15 5. Bus stop area...............................................................................................................23 6. Bus stop layouts..........................................................................................................24 7. Bus boarders................................................................................................................31 8. Bus bays ......................................................................................................................39 9. Kerb profiles and heights .............................................................................................43
    [Show full text]